$100 Short. Thanks Vickery you spud.

Nails · April 27, 2011, 12:24:14 PM

I'm $100 short on getting Jack Redden.

$7,600 in the bank. If I go Vickery > McCauley and Ward > ? I'm $100 short on Redden.

Why couldn't Vickery have scored 1-2 points more on the weekend damn SPUD.

Why does Vickery have to be such a spud and Redden such a gun? :(

Anyone else I could get in that's less $ than Redden but should put out a similar 105+ avg?

thatguy · April 27, 2011, 12:34:37 PM

might end up doing you a favour mate.

wouldnt expect redden to continue form like this.

he is more a 85-90 kinda guy IMO

Nails · April 27, 2011, 12:37:34 PM

Na. Redden is a gun. Lions look to him as he's our only decent player nearly everywhere he goes.

:O good fwd line option, midfield option and even gets it out of defence and has pretty much all easy sides to come for a while.

Low score of 82 against the dogs and then 3 110+ scores

Redden is a machine.

Fenno · April 27, 2011, 01:02:04 PM

Quote from: thatguy on April 27, 2011, 12:34:37 PM
might end up doing you a favour mate.

wouldnt expect redden to continue form like this.

he is more a 85-90 kinda guy IMO

+1 may push to 95-100 but wouldn't be trading him in not a premium

simma1978 · April 27, 2011, 02:06:52 PM

Quote from: Nails on April 27, 2011, 12:24:14 PM
I'm $100 short on getting Jack Redden.

$7,600 in the bank. If I go Vickery > McCauley and Ward > ? I'm $100 short on Redden.

Why couldn't Vickery have scored 1-2 points more on the weekend damn SPUD.

Why does Vickery have to be such a spud and Redden such a gun? :(

Anyone else I could get in that's less $ than Redden but should put out a similar 105+ avg?

The fact that you picked Vickery in the first place is extremely worrying!

Nails · April 27, 2011, 02:14:21 PM

Quote from: simma1978 on April 27, 2011, 02:06:52 PM
Quote from: Nails on April 27, 2011, 12:24:14 PM
I'm $100 short on getting Jack Redden.

$7,600 in the bank. If I go Vickery > McCauley and Ward > ? I'm $100 short on Redden.

Why couldn't Vickery have scored 1-2 points more on the weekend damn SPUD.

Why does Vickery have to be such a spud and Redden such a gun? :(

Anyone else I could get in that's less $ than Redden but should put out a similar 105+ avg?

The fact that you picked Vickery in the first place is extremely worrying!

Vickery was cover for Petrie for first few rounds.. then I changed my mind to trade Petrie in for r5... then Petrie only scored 2 60s and scared me off :(

someguy · April 27, 2011, 02:23:43 PM

Quote from: Nails on April 27, 2011, 02:14:21 PM
Quote from: simma1978 on April 27, 2011, 02:06:52 PM
Quote from: Nails on April 27, 2011, 12:24:14 PM
I'm $100 short on getting Jack Redden.

$7,600 in the bank. If I go Vickery > McCauley and Ward > ? I'm $100 short on Redden.

Why couldn't Vickery have scored 1-2 points more on the weekend damn SPUD.

Why does Vickery have to be such a spud and Redden such a gun? :(

Anyone else I could get in that's less $ than Redden but should put out a similar 105+ avg?

The fact that you picked Vickery in the first place is extremely worrying!

Vickery was cover for Petrie for first few rounds.. then I changed my mind to trade Petrie in for r5... then Petrie only scored 2 60s and scared me off :(

Vickery wasn't such a bad choice, just a risk that didn't pay off. Sounds like you've had a rough bit of luck Nails, hope things turn around for you. I do agree with thatguy and Fenno though, better options than Redden in the midfield, he'll probably end up averaging 85-95.