Dixon to Prestia...Quick poll

[Joe Dirt]

Got 23 trades, goin for league win

[hardnut]

go Atley to Prestia if you don't have a dpp link in the mids. If you already have a mid/fwd up front go Dixon. Either way Prestia is a much better option than the other two

[j959]

Prestia - at this early stage looking like a 'yes' for DT but a 'no' for SC.

i concur with hardnut's comments to you ...

[Andrew]

go Atley to Prestia if you don't have a dpp link in the mids. If you already have a mid/fwd up front go Dixon. Either way Prestia is a much better option than the other two

+1 but get Curnow too if you don't already have him.

[Mish]

i wouldnt be getting rid of atley just yet

[Joe Dirt]

yeah, but i've got 800k in the bank...so ive already got a fair few rookies that will make me money already...like tapscott darling mckernan matera in fwds, krak swallow curnow libba harris in mids...so do you think i dont really need any more cash cows?

[Andrew]

Wow-we. Well sell Atley for Prestia if you don't have the MID/FOR link, otherwise Dixon looks like a lower scorer than Atley.

[Mish]

why dont you just get some good premiums? or wait 1-2 weeks for their price to bottom and buy them.

how can you justify having $800k in the bank?

[Joe Dirt]

well instead of getting a 400k premium at the start, i got a rookie which gives me 300k in the bank. and then when the rookie goes up to 300k i can get a premium for 100k with another 200k in the bank which is enough for another 1/2 upgrades which saves me having to downgrade 1/2 rookies who have risen. so, (on the extreme side but just making a point) if you had 6million budget and bought a team of twenty 300k players, compared to twenty 100k rookies and having 4000k in the bank. The 300k players would rise a bit but you wouldnt have any money to upgrade. but say the rookies went to 250k you could upgrade every one of them to a 450k player with only 20 trades.