broughton -> adcock?

Bill Manspeaker · April 17, 2011, 09:05:31 PM

bring in adcock for broughton

i know its early and i'm not gonna pull the trigger or anything but this is the trade i have in mind.. is that on the mark or do people think i should go for a cheaper player?

Windigo · April 17, 2011, 09:07:38 PM

If Broughton fires, he will score the same as Adcock.

I don't think Jed will bust out the ton every week.

Better to make some quick cash & upgrade to a proven scorer.

Holz · April 17, 2011, 09:14:23 PM

if i dint have adcock i would make than move as soon as lockout opened. Myself personally im thinking broughton to carrots.

Dunham29 · April 17, 2011, 09:15:57 PM

Dont trade Broughton hell come good

Holz · April 17, 2011, 09:17:37 PM

Quote from: Dunham29 on April 17, 2011, 09:15:57 PM
Dont trade Broughton hell come good

based on what exactly?

don't trade Hargreaves he will come good.

Spite · April 17, 2011, 09:28:06 PM

Quote from: Holzman on April 17, 2011, 09:17:37 PM
Quote from: Dunham29 on April 17, 2011, 09:15:57 PM
Dont trade Broughton hell come good

based on what exactly?

don't trade Hargreaves he will come good.

+1

I am also looking at adcock

ronl · April 17, 2011, 09:30:23 PM

Looks to me like the Dockers have definately changed their structures this year, with Broughton definately playing a somewhat different role. However, with Suban's LTI it may be worth waiting a week or two to see if his backfield role changes and his scoring along with it.

blah128 · April 17, 2011, 10:14:44 PM

I've had Broughton since the start and will be keeping him for 2 reasons. Suban's injury and Ibbotson's return could change that structure back to suite Broughton again. And we've already lost nearly 60K on him. Unless trading down to someone on the rise who is much less than him, why not see if he can turn things around and make back some of that cash before upgrading him or realising he's a keeper once again