Conca

[swanny89]

I know trades are probably even more important than usual this year, but do you think it would be worth sideways trading Conca to Curnow? Do you think Conca will "come good" and end up increasing in value by much, because from what I can see he's not even scoring above his breakeven at the moment?

I could afford to upgarde Conca to a premium (had cash in the bank before Rnd 1) but am thinking of taking the cash with Curnow to spend later in the year. If you think go for a premium who would be your pick? If I do this I think I want to pick up a unique premium. Would you consider Embley or do you think he is too inconsistent? I think would be leaning towards Stanton.

[chatters24]

Conca will be fine I think. They will continue to pump games into him u would think too

[Wacky Tiger]

Conca will play most weeks id suggest even with poor form, they HAVE to get games into him. On current form youd expect Curnow to aswell but there is still that element of doubt when they get a few back and form later on with a finals bound Carlton poor form could mean no game.

Personally im in the same situation and i'll stick with Conca.  Need to save the trades.

[browny_wce]

I thought the similar trade, but now leaning to Atley as the Roos have the bye this round anyway and he wont change in price. so if by round 5 he smashes out a huge score I can snap him back up again.
A couple of wasted trades, but I dont need that many to do the upgrades I wanna do

[j959]

i don't think it's worth it because Richmond don't have their first bye til rd11 - plenty of time for Conca to fatten up and he will get games til then i'm thinking ...

[cmgb84]

i don't think it's worth it because Richmond don't have their first bye til rd11 - plenty of time for Conca to fatten up and he will get games til then i'm thinking ...

+1. well said