Swan or Pendlebury??????

Heater · February 04, 2009, 05:15:53 AM

Swan or Pendlebury for SC? Who would you choose out of these two?

MiGZ · February 04, 2009, 05:23:49 AM

pendles for sc, but swan for dt. pendles is more efficient.

Biggie · February 04, 2009, 06:50:16 AM

Pendlebury.

Swan is a inefficient kick.

ShrewDext · February 04, 2009, 06:53:30 AM

Correct MiGZ.

Im looking forward to a heap of young Pies players having breakout seasons this year.

Pendles may have come good (premium) last year but he still has plenty of upside. Probably consistancy is where he will improve.

Bazz · February 05, 2009, 12:00:23 AM

Pendlebury.

Still dont like how swan spends time on the bench javascript:void(0);

mog_dog00 · February 05, 2009, 11:42:38 PM

na i'd go Swan anyday over pendlebury - he's more of a footballer

Hawks_1976 · February 07, 2009, 04:56:15 AM

MiGZ got it spot on.
Swan for DT.
Pendlebury for SC.
End of debate.
This year I think Swan's number will stay about the same while I believe Pendelbury's averages from 08 should increase by about 10 in both formats. His use of the footy improves with every game he plays.

Alex7089 · February 24, 2009, 01:46:01 AM

Pendles for SC
Swan for DT
MiGZ hit the nail on the head.

Swan or Pendlebury??????

Alex7089