Chapman v Stevie Johnson

Started by sinclair39, March 16, 2011, 11:15:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

 Which of the two would you prefer in your side? (talking the price of both players into account)

Steve Johnson
13 (68.4%)
Paul Chapman
6 (31.6%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Print
Go Down Pages 1 2
User actions

8-6 Suited

#15
March 18, 2011, 04:55:36 PM
And injuries all throughout the off season... playing with fire. You don't want to waste a trade to upgrade to him but will have to waste one on a side trade or downgrade when he does get injured due to poor match fitness and injury plague season once again.

enzedder

#16
March 18, 2011, 05:00:16 PM
Quote from: 8-6 Suited on March 18, 2011, 04:55:36 PM
And injuries all throughout the off season... playing with fire. You don't want to waste a trade to upgrade to him but will have to waste one on a side trade or downgrade when he does get injured due to poor match fitness and injury plague season once again.
I see what you're saying and understand that the majority have jumped off Chapman in the last month for that reason. It may be risky but I'd still prefer him in my line up than getting a weaker or inconsistent supercoach player in...like Stevie J

enzedder

#17
March 18, 2011, 05:03:10 PM
Quote from: Fletch74 on March 18, 2011, 04:53:24 PM
Quote from: enzedder on March 18, 2011, 04:50:34 PM
Quote from: BOOMZ on March 18, 2011, 04:41:11 PM
It's usually a bad risk picking one of the most expensive players when they're coming off a cold pre-season. He'll drop in price but if u want to be stuck with him when he does :-\ Personally just don't get ur thinking...
2 80s, 4 90s and 15 100+s last year. I want him and won't waste a trade bringing him in.
No pre-season, more than likely to start pretty cold though Enzedder, especially against the Saints as well.
Nah...I barrack for the Saints I've seen what that bas**** can do...lol...he'll kick 8 goals and win em the game :'(
Print
Go Up Pages 1 2
User actions