Swan & Pendles in same team - any concerns there?

[MightyLions]

Couldn't agree more - how bad are Collingwood's byes?? There was a great post a while ago with every team's byes listed, but I can't find it any more...

It's in SC Strategy.

I think it's a concern as you'll have 2 premiums missing in Rd 7, so unless you're planning to upgrade a rookie before then, you will miss 2 premiums that week.

Why not choose one as an upgrade and diversify your selections?

+1 - Upgrade them after round 13 (there last bye)

[Talisman]

Fair call Fletch - but then who to keep & who to mark as the upgrade target then? Will either drop in price much?? That's my concern - if neither do, then you've missed the train...

Don't get me wrong, I think you're right, & wherever possible I am diversifying my selections - in fact this would be the only area where I would have 2 starting players from the same team - my def, ruck & fwd starters are from all different teams.

But here's my concern. Do the other mids around pendles' price offer the scope for improvement that he does? (maybe murphy, but that prelim final bye puts me way off, as it means I will have to waste a sideawys trade late in the season, already have montagna, so dal santo only presents the same original problem, & can't afford hodge - only $900 short - dammit!!)