SC 2010 Winner - season review

Started by tferrier18, February 17, 2011, 06:12:49 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

tom_scully

Pretty simple premise really. If Team A is ranked higher than Team B, most times they go head to head, Team A will win.

ossie85


Well, actually, that depends on standard deviations also :) But yes, generally you're right Tom.

BUT we're focusing on the LAST four weeks - the finals. Prior scores aren't going to help you in the finals, especially if your team doesn't have the trade cover as a 'lesser' ranked team.


Exactly the same in the AFL also Tom! In the last 10 seasons Essendon, Port Adelaide (twice), West Coast, Adelaide, Geelong and St. Kilda have all finished top and DIDN'T win the flag. Whereas the Lions NEVER finished top and won 3 flags!


roo boys!

That is one AMAZING team at the end :o :o

supercoach addict

I dunno. You wouldn't think the winning team would have Jarrad Waite.

stewfoss

Quote from: supercoach addict on February 18, 2011, 03:50:54 PM
Was only his 2nd year of sc as well

this is my second year... must be my turn!

pocket_rocket4

His last score was 2326 it would be hard to find a strategy concentrating on leagues to get better than that in round 22 thats what hes trying to say

tferrier18

Who's to say he made it to the final?

Prospector_1

Quote from: tom_scully on February 19, 2011, 08:54:51 PM
Pretty simple premise really. If Team A is ranked higher than Team B, most times they go head to head, Team A will win.

How often have i heard, "****'s a lousy team, they only beat teams lower than them on the ladder!"

antman

Quote from: Prospector_1 on February 22, 2011, 12:21:50 AM
Quote from: tom_scully on February 19, 2011, 08:54:51 PM
Pretty simple premise really. If Team A is ranked higher than Team B, most times they go head to head, Team A will win.

How often have i heard, "****'s a lousy team, they only beat teams lower than them on the ladder!"
Thats because they are on top of the ladder ;D