Who has more upside - Green or Pav?

dcmagadia21 · February 25, 2011, 05:04:13 PM

thoughts?

Bluke · February 25, 2011, 05:13:06 PM

Green probably has more downside... Pav should stay the same.

Cant see either uping their avg much on last season. Pav maybe by up to 5 ppg.

dcmagadia21 · February 25, 2011, 05:18:18 PM

probably yeah. green's performance wasn't that good last night and pav doesn't get tons that often but gets consistent 90+'s so price won't change. i was just thinking who can my 3rd forward be?

thornz23 · February 25, 2011, 05:49:25 PM

my 3rd is didak atm depending on how he looks. but i would definitely be going pav over green. green is getting old and pav is still gna give u those 90+ scores

Zarts · February 25, 2011, 05:51:37 PM

mmm, I hear the people saying pav, but like pavs avg. has been dropping since 2007, although he does play nearly every game every year, green had his highest average yet last year, so it really depends on whether you think he can maintain it. Personally, I'm taking neither. They both just seem to have downsides, and you have to be wondering about both of them hitting 30 years in '11.

and thornz, I would be considering didak as more of a upgrade target, with his (shoulder?) injury atm, he may have a slow start.

thornz23 · February 25, 2011, 05:54:58 PM

yeh thats y im just gna c how he is looking. i reli like him because he aaaalways kicks the ball lol. but if he's not fit at the start of the yr i definitely wnt have him in my team

Bluke · February 25, 2011, 06:00:53 PM

Greens upside is in the fact that both Melbournes byes fall in DT League bye rounds.

Same with Sylvia obviously.

Goodes and OKeefe maybe