bock v drummond

Started by dylsta05, February 07, 2011, 05:57:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

dylsta05

February 07, 2011, 05:57:57 PM
which one do you think?

tferrier18

#1
February 07, 2011, 06:12:50 PM
well drummond isn't fit and we don't know too much about how bock will be used.

I'd say bock is safer though just because he's fit.

Boomz

#2
February 07, 2011, 06:13:34 PM
Bock at this stage because as tferrier said he's fit Drummond isn't...

enzedder

#3
February 08, 2011, 08:45:11 PM
Quote from: BOOMZ on February 07, 2011, 06:13:34 PM
Bock at this stage because as tferrier said he's fit Drummond isn't...
Got to be Bock...injury status report for Drummond shows he's not in good nick and with his history you can't really have him...it's a shame because Drummond is at a great price for someone who can score like he does.

Usman

#4
February 08, 2011, 09:29:22 PM
BOCK

Will be the general in defence aswell as the key to their forward thrusts out of defensive 50. And the ball will be there alot!

Swallow12

#5
February 08, 2011, 10:12:03 PM
Well I don't like either but Bock is better purely because he is fit and Drummond isnt

Luigi197

#6
February 08, 2011, 10:27:55 PM
Bock if anything..

IMO neither... Duffield, Hurn, Grimes for the price
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions