To add cock or not to adcock

Started by Footy God, February 07, 2011, 06:43:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Adockk

add the cock
8 (50%)
Nahhhhh, not gonna get him
8 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Footy God

Adcock a good option as 5th back or other people going for rookies like Coad or Toy instead?

Price: 262.5k

In 2007 averaged 89, 2008 70, 2009 85, played 9 games for an average of 63 last year.

Games played in previous years: 9, 15, 21, 22

Age: 26

diddley

i have the awful feeling he is going to be the andrew raines of a couple of years ago. everyone had him, and thought he was going to do well, but he played 3 games and averaged 53.

RiOtChEsS

Quote from: diddley on February 07, 2011, 07:03:00 PM
i have the awful feeling he is going to be the andrew raines of a couple of years ago. everyone had him, and thought he was going to do well, but he played 3 games and averaged 53.
+1 not for me...

games in years gone by 2 22 8 22 21 15 9

ronl

Not for me either, too much risk for too little gain.

Holz

Quote from: diddley on February 07, 2011, 07:03:00 PM
i have the awful feeling he is going to be the andrew raines of a couple of years ago. everyone had him, and thought he was going to do well, but he played 3 games and averaged 53.

raines was never a proven scorer, adcock has a good DT history, possibly the same injury risk as raine but will score more than 53 if fit. Its him playing thats the issue not his scores.

plus brisbane basically have no players so i would think adcock would easily be in thier top 10 players

Blueboys


Footy God

Any brisbane fans out there? Predicited avergae if he plays 22?

Footy God

Probaby what im facing is:
Petrie + Adcock
OR
Cox/Jolly + Coad/Toy

nas

Cox Jolly + your call Toy as great wraps.

Windigo

Half my Backs have had injury history.

Because of Symes, Adcock and Otten.

All have injury history but it's a risk that could pay dividends.  :-\

But Adcock if fit and plays 22 games could average 85+. That I'm sure of.

But he has dodgy feet. :P