lindsay gillbee

[ando_10]

everyones thoughts??

[steven_ora]

id rather duffield but who knows gilbee could turm it on this year?

[Hydra]

There's a lot of players between 400k and 450k that will probably score similarly all year. It could be up to everyone's individual taste to see who will do better.

Connors, Hurn, Duffield, Gilbee, etc.

[Luigi197]

too incosistent, does kicks! but not enough points overall

[Alex7089]

Maybe. There are others I like better though, like Connors, Grimes, Hurn & Gilbert.

Hurn the pick of the bunch, a touch cheaper and the SC King.

[steven_ora]

i think hurn is overated

yeh his a bit cheaper but i had him last year and burned me hard and i no people say 'he can get 100 with 15 touches imagine when he gets 25+' but the thing is he never does that... everyone just loves him because of his long kicking but to be honest i think he goes extremely soft at the football and if not injured which is bound to happen he will be an sc spud!

so go hurn if you want but i would much rather duffield even if he is a little extra cash...

[Alex7089]

I had Duffield & Hurn last year. Neither stunned me. I'd rather take Hurn though, he doesn't rely on30+ touches to get a ton. Which I like.

[steven_ora]

same i had both but hurn was way more frustrating when ever he got a tag he just seemed to not work hard at all and i rememeber on game he was on 90 at half time and ended up just scoring 100. hurn was just so dissapointing last year im suprised anyone who had him last year would chose him again?

[tferrier18]

I don't think you should go with gilbee... to me, he just doesn't live up to his potential. Gilbee often goes missing in games so I don't think he has that much upside. I like grimes or bock.

[diddley]

his score relies on what role he is playing that game. i have been burnt to many times by gilbee. just when you think he is going well, he then deflates, and returns nothing.