Is it worth naming 2 emergencies in forwards?

Started by enzedder, August 25, 2010, 05:34:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

enzedder

Potentially all of my forwards may play...but there are rumours and speculation about Didak, Hall and Brown missing out so is it better to name 2 forward emergencies knowing that if only 1 is needed you cop the lowest score of the 2 or have both emergencies to prevent a doughnut...my 2 on the pine would be Hall and TDL....I am likely to only have one other emergency who is achance of playing (Harwood in mids)

ossie85

Is a risk, but maybe. Could cost you as much as 60 points though

Hawka

done that in my defence be4 and wen goddard was a alte withdrawl i was forced to get hooker 31 when strike got much beta but u mite as well if u dont have enough players on the bench playin in other postions