SC scores

Started by rory, August 14, 2010, 10:08:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

bradway

I reckon the geeks at Champion Data are locked in dispute over exactly what Ryan Okeefes Supercoach score should be after he kicked the goal to win the game just before the siren.
Do not take montys score as gospel because it may not be correct.

Alex7089

I hope you are wrong Bradway, I need that 134 from ROK.

I have to agree though probably still working on that. The next morning should be done by now though ::)

tom_scully


LF

Bloody scores still aren't up so annoying.

HillHero13

watching sunday footy sgow ROK sc is 132

LouMo

Has there been any explanation for it?? News articles? Is there a suggested timeline for when it will be fixed??

More importantly, where can we make a complaint?? I may be getting ahead of myself, but I'm missing 330 points, which will most certainly be more than the final margin of my game this week.

Master Q


SCADDICT

Just checked my supercoach

Scores are now updated(at least for me)

ROK only 107 sc points not 130

BratPack

Quote from: SCADDICT on August 15, 2010, 11:55:16 AM
Just checked my supercoach

Scores are now updated(at least for me)

ROK only 107 sc points not 130

Yep 107 for ROK I have it too

rory

Puts a little faith back in the system.

LF

What a waste of time the scores finally came up and they are crap except Grundy 109.pav,fyfe and eski killed my sc.lucky I have the week off.

BratPack

Broughton 144
Bradley 105
Fyfe 43
Mundy 104
Pav 76
Roberton 89

Goodes 50
Grundy 109
Hanneberry 126
Jack 113
Kennelly 120
ROK 107
Mummy 175

Boomz

I'm happy as long as they dont take too many off mummy ;D

hawk_88

Quote from: BOOMZ on August 15, 2010, 12:29:37 PM
I'm happy as long as they dont take too many off mummy ;D

just a couple,

The scores at the quarter breaks and the end of the game are estimates. They are done quickly to give players a sense of the actual score. ROK's was clearly over estimated and I think we would all agree that despite scoring the match winning goals, 107 is much closer to his contribution than 132.