DIFFERENT approach from everyone else. MUST SEE

Started by chrisjudd, March 19, 2009, 11:19:26 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

chrisjudd

Okay I think I've read most people's teams. And many of them look the same, obviously.

I've taken a different approach, My theory is that Luke Hodge will NOT go down in price sufficiently enough for people to get him later on in the season. He has had some form of a preseason, whether it be interrupted or not. Judd had no preseason last year, and still managed to average 110.

this is my team. Further, Although people think that some of my players won't get to play every game, I'm extremely sure that the bench players will be able to fill in. My type of play will obviously rely on my big boys to do the bulk of scoring obviously, and if i can get the other players to have games of about 50-80, My overall score should be good enough to get me the win.



Backs: Goddard, Waite, C.Cornes, Raines, Houlihan, Petterd, Henderson (Suban, Petrenko)


Midfield: Ablett, Hodge, Bartel, Judd, B.Harvey, S.Higgins (Robinson, Davenport)

Ruck: Cox, Hille (Meeson, Jacobs)

Forward: R.O'Keefe, Deledio, Monfries, Skipworth, N.Krakouer, Yarran, Ziebell (M.Brown, T.Walker)


My forward line may seem weak, but all i need from Monfries, who i think will be awesome this year as he reminds me of a R O'Keefe like player, is about 80-90 per week, which he is very very capable of. Yarran, Ziebell and Krakouer, have faith, they will be fine. As will my bench forwards


I'd Love to hear EVERYBODY'S feedback. dont be shy

Bo

Monfries and petterd are terrible. Taking hodge in the midfield seems like an error. Who the hell is henderson. Otherwise the team is fine.

ando10

LOL
lachie henderson im guessing hmmmmm

bad move


i HATE angus monfries but might pay off

chrisjudd

ive put hodge in the midfield because i really want jarrad waite
hes going to have a great year because
hes a good kick
hes a great mark, racks them up
can carry the ball through the midfield
can kick goals

i dno why people dont like monfries, im not taking him out, sorry guys, hes my dark horse

ive taken out petterd for hill, henderson for collier
who i originally had lol

Cool9

mmm.... Monfries, a dark horse indeed. Very dark.

Bo

Hey its your team, go for it. A wise man once said Monfries would be the next James Hird. If you're happy with that team and you can justify each selection gl to you.

slicker23

i am a blues man, and i love the way jarrod waite goes about it, but he is NOT a great kick!

Richo_Richo_Man

any1 who is not a great kick is a worry as clangers are expensive.

I think if you have a dual posy player that includes (mid) then don't put them in mid. Ie. Hodge in backs.

Ablett did in 2008 what u described re Hodge..so I'm in favour of paying for the super dupers, regardless if they go down.

Monfries: I'll have to research that.

Your side has potential..but itl b fun come team announcements....watch the changes!  :)

Good Luck.



Fatty

Ya got the old brain box working overtime Juddy but I reckon Nate Krack will come back and bite you on bike rack. If all goes well at Portland Krack will kick on but he throws in more clangers than Germaine Greer. If things turn Pear Shaped down at Alberton then Krack will be the scapegoat.

He'll get plenty of the pill but his disposals might prove hard to swallow. Bad medicine...DT player for mine.

Fatty