Main Menu

which one

Started by ando10, March 18, 2009, 12:59:17 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ando10

masten/adcock
tuck/malceski
haselby/malceski
masten/malceski
dont have the cash for tuck/adcock and hasleby/adcock

SimonOz

IMO

Safest is Tuck/Malceski, better gamble maybe Hasleby/Malceski

(Full Disclosure: I'm all over Malceski like a rash - not so much the others mentioned - which is probably my mistake)

ando10

yeah thats the combo i have now
i think it can work malceski will be on a different level this year to what he was last year and same with tuck

mog_dog00

the eski scored better in games where kennelly did not play.. so u would think he's drop into that role now but the swannies now have rhyce shaw to the run out of defence role - or so it would seem. im not gonna touch the eski from the start. who the fcuk knows how sydney will go or how what player roles are!! didn't get to see a single performance in the nab (well a legit performance!!)  so im running houlihan and raines - stuff the eski lol

ando10

haha any ideas for a malceski replacement?

SimonOz

I've had both Houlihan & Raines in & out of my lineup...but it keeps coming back to upside....neither of which IMO is huge.....they are two players I think that at the end of the year will only be slightly higher valued than now.

I can reconfig. the backline - take malceski out and go with Bock, who went up 20pts in ave year over year.

I'd have to downgrade my 5th back to do it though.

At the same level as Eski - the only other two I'd look at would be Bower or Harry O...