PETRIE OR MCINTOSH????

Started by mog_dog00, March 18, 2009, 01:50:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

mog_dog00

Im aware u can pick up petrie as a forward but if u want him u might as well have him as a ruck.. yea??  anyway mcintosh seems like good value.
the cash doesn't concern me.. basically who would ppl RATHER in their side???  regardless of price, ect.

JustGonnaDominate

If there was no salary cap i thnk its safe to say that 99% of people would go for Petrie as he is a much more mobile ruck option but it all depends on team balance and if u have the money free i would go for petrie and hille over him.

SimonOz

mog dog.....I've read a ton of reports over the last 4-6 weeks.....and the feeling I get is that Hamish is under the hammer down at Arden St.

Just reading btwn the lines in the articles - but it would be enuf for me to go Petrie, who most would take anyway, but a flyer on Mc now which seems to me what your thinking to save some cash is not worth the risk.

oz

mog_dog00

cheers justgonnadominate!! i think similar but wanted someone to confirm. u get the whole deal wit petrie contested marks, goals and ruckwork.. i got big cox and petrie and i do hav the cash. just means i drop masten for rich or ziebel she'll be right

mog_dog00

thanks 4 the hot tip simonoz.. didn't know that and i appreciate it