National Draft Thread

Started by Jukes, August 24, 2017, 11:53:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jukes

Quote from: powersuperkents on December 10, 2017, 05:42:45 PM
Quote from: Pkbaldy on December 10, 2017, 05:39:20 PM
Quote from: Jukes on December 10, 2017, 05:33:42 PM
Actually not the end, I’m still taking one more player! And anybody else can do (I know kb has a ton of list spots!)

Connor Ballenden

Isn't that what the rookie draft is for?? Excess Nat draftees?
+1

The OP did say “can continue if required”, it wasn’t locked into six rounds. It never has been.

If y’all wanted Ballenden you should’ve picked him.

powersuperkents

Quote from: Jukes on December 10, 2017, 05:49:51 PM
Quote from: powersuperkents on December 10, 2017, 05:42:45 PM
Quote from: Pkbaldy on December 10, 2017, 05:39:20 PM
Quote from: Jukes on December 10, 2017, 05:33:42 PM
Actually not the end, I’m still taking one more player! And anybody else can do (I know kb has a ton of list spots!)

Connor Ballenden

Isn't that what the rookie draft is for?? Excess Nat draftees?
+1

The OP did say “can continue if required”, it wasn’t locked into six rounds. It never has been.

If y’all wanted Ballenden you should’ve picked him.
Just to clarify, my issue is not with the picks after round 6 of the NAT (that's always been standard practice since 2015), but rather checking to see if the draft order has been followed - have all the coaches that finished 7th-12th on the ladder either passed on their picks or possess full lists.

Although some of the coaches have not expressly passed, I've noticed that they have implied it on the rookie draft thread - so I have no issue if that's the case.

elephants

Yeah we'll have a dig here and grab Kane Farrell