Forward loophole options

[TomK]

Would need to trade Parfitt to get Butlers score, not sure it's worth it

I am in the same boat but Parfitt is not over the line yet just because he is named on the field does not mean he is going to play have a look at the extended bench can see just about all them playing

If they're named on the field, they are playing, the 3 players cut are always from the extended bench.

[LordSneeze]

This thread happens every year in R1.

Just back in your picks and don't jepodise your structure for a single score.

Only way I could consider is if a player went 130+

[RaisyDaisy]

I don't even have Butler and honestly I'm not bothered at all

Every year a rookie does this, and it's not worth changing your team and plans for.

He played the Blues ffs. Let's see how he goes vs Coll and WCE over the next 2 weeks

[aussied]

This thread happens every year in R1.

Just back in your picks and don't jepodise your structure for a single score.

Only way I could consider is if a player went 130+

i think this is more along the lines of if someone is meant to play round 2, it would be good to get them in and get butlers score on field then to take a risk with a par 60.

if there's someone guaranteed for round 2 and not playing round one then i would love to know too :)

[tor01doc]

My final team is not set in stone until just before the last lockout of the round.

Nankervis has shown he is very likely to make money. He is worthy of a spot at R1 / 2 for long enough to find out which rucks will be the best ie Gawn, Goldy, Grundy etc and these guys prob won't increase in price more than Nankervis.

I will prob look at grabbing Witts now and using the money to make a rookie into a keeper on another line.

Strandixqnica can move to F8 next week and Nank to R1/2 (next to Sandi).

Win - get an extra keeper
Win - save a trade
Win - keep R/F DPP alive
Win - make more money
Win - get Butler's 96

[Bully]

My final team is not set in stone until just before the last lockout of the round.

Nankervis has shown he is very likely to make money. He is worthy of a spot at R1 / 2 for long enough to find out which rucks will be the best ie Gawn, Goldy, Grundy etc and these guys prob won't increase in price more than Nankervis.

I will prob look at grabbing Witts now and using the money to make a rookie into a keeper on another line.

Strandixqnica can move to F8 next week and Nank to R1/2 (next to Sandi).

Win - get an extra keeper
Win - save a trade
Win - keep R/F DPP alive
Win - make more money
Win - get Butler's 96

Welcome to Wankilands!

[tor01doc]

I was made a life member of Wankilands a long time ago

[Keeper27]

This thread happens every year in R1.

Just back in your picks and don't jepodise your structure for a single score.

Only way I could consider is if a player went 130+

HAHA so true... i love how some people are willing to ruin structures for 1 players score.

I was made a life member of Wankilands a long time ago

Witts + Nank + Sandi???