How many Mid-Pricer's Poll

Started by petefisker, March 16, 2017, 11:32:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

AaronKirk

Way too many.

Greene, Z.Williams, Macmillan, Beams, JOM, D.Swallow, SMartin, Sandi, Marchbank, Roughead, Nankervis

dmac07

Wow can't beleive everyone has so many... I know rookies are tougher this year but still going mostly guns and rookies. Have 3! Sandi, Swallow, Tuohy. Tuohy I'm hoping is a keeper.

tommy10

#17
7 including Lloyd. Might be 8 depending on whether I get Nank or not...

Samsturmfels

at the moment i have 4
Beams, Omera, swallow, roughy

however i have 12 players over 500k in my team atm

petefisker


MontyJnr

If Marchbank is a midpricer, does that make Witts a midpricer? But then Witts is around the same price as Taranto so.... ?

RaisyDaisy

IMO a mid pricer is someone above 250k

Marchbank, WHE, Witts etc are in the catagory of expensive rookies


shaker

Yeah think 230K - 500K is to big a span for mid pricers anyway I have 9 with the figures in the post but I only count Roughy , O'Meara , Sandi , and Nank mid pricers in my team

Sabretooth Tigers

 :)

5 in this current team.   Beams,  O'Meara,  Swallow,  Caddy,  J Steele.     ATM  have the Goldy / Gawn  ruck combo but will drop 1 for Sandi and throw Nank up forward if there are enough rookies selected for Rd.1.  Never, ever, had so many totally different team drafts prior to Rd.1. before.   

::)

Perthwildcat

Anyone above 400k is not really a mid pricer

petefisker

Quote from: shaker on March 18, 2017, 05:18:15 PM
Yeah think 230K - 500K is to big a span for mid pricers anyway I have 9 with the figures in the post but I only count Roughy , O'Meara , Sandi , and Nank mid pricers in my team

The main reason I did it 230K is to get people with WHE, marchbank and Witt's in there. These players ARE NOT rookies. The most expensive rookies are less than 230.
The whole point of this is determine how many 'risks' you're taking.
WHE has an injury and fitness clouds, and Witt's is the bigger spud muffin I've seen play the game.
Sandy, roughy, beeams etc people saying are fallen premises so they don't count, lol BS, they've fallen because of injury and or form. So its a RISK no matter how small.
Pretty shocked at the 9+ Gona be a cracking season

SilverLion

7:

Thurlow

Beams, O'Meara, Swallow

Sandilands

Nankervis, Steele

crowls

Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 17, 2017, 06:48:42 PM
at the moment i have 4
Beams, Omera, swallow, roughy

however i have 12 players over 500k in my team atm
What is the price mix of your rookies.   Do you have all low priced rookies to support this structure?

djbics

Quote from: petefisker on March 19, 2017, 10:13:21 AM
Quote from: shaker on March 18, 2017, 05:18:15 PM
Yeah think 230K - 500K is to big a span for mid pricers anyway I have 9 with the figures in the post but I only count Roughy , O'Meara , Sandi , and Nank mid pricers in my team

The main reason I did it 230K is to get people with WHE, marchbank and Witt's in there. These players ARE NOT rookies. The most expensive rookies are less than 230.
The whole point of this is determine how many 'risks' you're taking.
WHE has an injury and fitness clouds, and Witt's is the bigger spud muffin I've seen play the game.
Sandy, roughy, beeams etc people saying are fallen premises so they don't count, lol BS, they've fallen because of injury and or form. So its a RISK no matter how small.
Pretty shocked at the 9+ Gona be a cracking season

lol, W H-E is 213k so he isn't in the criteria anyway  ;)

I get what you're saying though, everyone has a different idea on what counts as a mid-pricer.  Personally I dont like that 500k always seems to be the upper limit irregardless of position, as a 500k Midfielder is a lot more Mid-priced compared to a 500k Defender or Forward.

Going by the criteria of the poll I have 9, and here I was thinking I was more aligned to a G'n'R approach  :o

To be fair, of that 9 I have 3 at the top end who are only 14k or less away from moving to 'Premium', and 3 at the bottom end that are 6k or less from moving to 'Rookie' status, so I'm still pretty comfortable