JPK or Hanners

Started by TexR74, January 25, 2017, 03:27:23 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

eaglesman

Quote from: _wato on January 28, 2017, 10:31:51 AM
Quote from: eaglesman on January 28, 2017, 01:56:28 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 28, 2017, 01:24:46 AM
Quote from: eaglesman on January 28, 2017, 01:07:10 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 28, 2017, 01:01:15 AM
Quote from: eaglesman on January 28, 2017, 12:54:28 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 28, 2017, 12:45:55 AM
Wow only 11% JPK and 9% for Hanners that is unreal. A bloke who's gone back to back 113 and a guy who could potentially go back to a 120 avg.

Ridiculous! It might look like I am on an anti-bont campaign but if people think that bonts ownership % should be higher than Kennedy's all for a saving of $31k they have got rocks in their head.

Couldn't agree more. I'm also anti Bont. Much better picks out there. Bont isn't a relatively safe choice simply because of the high volume of Dogs midfielders, they bat the deepest in the league. I feel like he pulled it along for most of the year due to the frequency of injuries ie Dahl Wallis Macrae Jong. With them all fit I just don't see Bont demanding as much footy. He'll still be good but he won't be 110+ good nooooo way.

This is exactly my thinking.

It's just a conundrum whether ya pick him to follow the crowd so that they don't get a leg up or use the non selection as a POD

Non selection pod easy. what's worst case scenario? He averages 115. Ain't a massive loss and get him in later.

Best case? He goes 105 and they keep him all year.

Out of interest Selections you like in the range of  Jpk-m4 m5? Fyfe-m6 ....

Rockliff.
He is in my team as well ... love the thinking

plumdog millionaire

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on January 28, 2017, 09:38:56 AM

Was just thinking this, there really isn't a really strong reason not to - They have the same bye as the Dogs and Lions so you could go without Beams/Rocky/Bont and stick with these two proven, consistent guns. If you treated them as separate players on separate teams I don't think there would be any question.

GoLions

I don't really get the whole 'being from the same team' thing.

Pendles/Swanny/Beams --> JPK/Hanners/Parker

And then guys like Danger/Jelwood, Fyfe/Neale, Rocky/Beams, Pendles/Treloar/Sidey, Ward/Coniglio/Shiel

Picking 2-3 mids (or any other position) from the same team is fine if they're all gun scorers. Just gotta be careful of selecting players from teams who share the same bye as those guys.

Ringo

That is the real issue with Lions. Dogs and Swans sharing a RD 11 bye and you would not want more than 3 mid prems out.  Bont, Rocky, Beams, Hanners, JPK, Parker would like all but only room for 3.