2 Mids from the same team (stats from previous years)

Started by WizzFizz, April 25, 2016, 12:14:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

WizzFizz

Is it bad to have selly danger parker and hanners

I currently only have selly and danger but I want to upgrade into hanners but am wondering if getting parker aswell is too much

Ive done research and in recent years these plays from the same team have scored well. Ive also included the teams ladder positions

2015:
Fyfe Mundy 124 113 1st
Hanners JPK 114 110 4th
Montagna Armo 111 109 14th

2014:
Pendles Sidey Beams 124 115 113 11th
JPK Parker 113 108 1st
Fyfe Barlow 122 111 4th

2013:
Pendles Swan 127 117 6th
Selly Stevie 118 116 2nd
Griffen Libba 116 107 15th
Montagna Steven 115 110 16th
Danger Sloane 113 107 11th

2012:
Swan Pendles Beams 126 125 123 4th
JPK Jack 120 112 3rd
Danger Sthommo Sloane 119 110 107 2nd
Deledio Cotch Tuck 117 116 115 12th

2011:
Pendles Swan Daisy 129 124 109 1st
Murph Judd 118 117 5th
NDS Goddard 121 108 6th
Boyd Griffen 113 107 10th
Fyfe Mundy 108 107 11th



So what I can see from that is that either the combo of mids are high up the ladder on a winning team, or low down the ladder forced to carry the load.

Parker and JPK are on a winning team
Selly and Danger or in a mix of both


thoughts??

kilbluff1985

the only thing i don't like about doing it it is less likely they will both got big in the same week if in the same team

obviously it's mostly the averages that matters but the above bothers me a bit

PICCOLLO

No problems at all.

I have danger and selly. Ask me how its worked out so far. :)

Pendles and Swanny did it for years.

Even at the Swans id be confident with it. Yes Jack interferes a bit but you could have 3 of them! As long as theyre winning games theres loads of points to go around.

Peter

Not a problem as not same byes - I have 3 of the 4 and after losing Fyfe, probably will go to Selwood with their upcoming draw

_wato

Anyone think Hanners Titch Parker could all go 110? Not much talk of Titch at all, going over 110.

MC

Quote from: _wato on April 25, 2016, 07:17:22 PM
Anyone think Hanners Titch Parker could all go 110? Not much talk of Titch at all, going over 110.

Well i've got JPK who i'd hope would be 110+ by season's end. 4 from a team sounds ridiculous though.

_wato

Don't think JPK will go near 110 this year.

75, 95, 124, 97, 101 avg 98

His dt numbers are down huge (15ppg +) Bc of Parker's form no doubt. He'll go 100-105

Titch 127, 133, 108, 71, 113 avg 110

GCSkiwi

Quote from: _wato on April 25, 2016, 07:17:22 PM
Anyone think Hanners Titch Parker could all go 110? Not much talk of Titch at all, going over 110.

I liked Titch last year when he could be selected as a fwd, I think as a mid only he's a risky pick considering Hanners and Parker will probably out do him, for 110-115 there will be plenty of players and as KB said it's a risk having lots from the same team.

Something to keep in mind from the OP is that sure all those numbers were achieved in a season, but if you look at the pies from years when they had 3 guns (from Swan/Pendles/Beams/Sidey) all hitting big, it was extremely rare they would all do that in one week. You'd get 2 going big and one quiet, but it shifted around so they all averaged well. I think Parker is a gun but his round 1 score is perhaps dragging him up a bit, Hanners would be my number 1 option from the swans for sure, not sure who number 2 would be, and picking up 3 is asking for trouble imo.