Round 13 Team Announcements: First Bye Round

[Judd Magic]

20 players
Nah
17 Brand Paps & Bennedy feeding me a doughnut.
Tempted to go Hall to Rockliff now but kind of stuffs my plans for next weekend

Ben Kennedy is playing.

[j959]

20 players
Nah
17 Brand Paps & Bennedy feeding me a doughnut.
Tempted to go Hall to Rockliff now but kind of stuffs my plans for next weekend

Ben Kennedy is playing.

yeah, no change from last week I see ...

[Torpedo10]

Ugh.
The Hopper->Jansen is so tempting, but does that make the Hopper inclusion against weak opposition a waste?

I'm also waiting on Gawn with Nat, both have byes next week and I have a bad feeling he won't perform against Sydney.

[Judd Magic]

Ugh.
The Hopper->Jansen is so tempting, but does that make the Hopper inclusion against weak opposition a waste?

I'm also waiting on Gawn with Nat, both have byes next week and I have a bad feeling he won't perform against Sydney.

Gawn will kill it against Sydney's second string rucks.  8)

[djbics]

Ugh.
The Hopper->Jansen is so tempting, but does that make the Hopper inclusion against weak opposition a waste?

I'm also waiting on Gawn with Nat, both have byes next week and I have a bad feeling he won't perform against Sydney.

Gawn will kill it against Sydney's second string rucks.  8)

He'll get plenty of hit-outs, yeah.  But a lot of his score will rest on our (The Dees) midfield getting first hands on the ball.  If Hannebery, Jack, JPK,TMitch, Parker et al dominate then his score wont be as big as some think. Quite happy to be proven wrong though  ;D

[enzedder]

20 players
Nah
17 Brand Paps & Bennedy feeding me a doughnut.
Tempted to go Hall to Rockliff now but kind of stuffs my plans for next weekend

Ben Kennedy is playing.

Thanks...my bad.

[enzedder]

Ugh.
The Hopper->Jansen is so tempting, but does that make the Hopper inclusion against weak opposition a waste?

I'm also waiting on Gawn with Nat, both have byes next week and I have a bad feeling he won't perform against Sydney.

Gawn will kill it against Sydney's second string rucks.  8)

He'll get plenty of hit-outs, yeah.  But a lot of his score will rest on our (The Dees) midfield getting first hands on the ball.  If Hannebery, Jack, JPK,TMitch, Parker et al dominate then his score wont be as big as some think. Quite happy to be proven wrong though  ;D

Other rucks have scored well against Sydney this year. I checked them out during the week, can't be bothered to do it again to post here but a few 100-120 type scores. If Danger fails I'll take that from Max.

[Torpedo10]

Ugh.
The Hopper->Jansen is so tempting, but does that make the Hopper inclusion against weak opposition a waste?

I'm also waiting on Gawn with Nat, both have byes next week and I have a bad feeling he won't perform against Sydney.

Gawn will kill it against Sydney's second string rucks.  8)

He'll get plenty of hit-outs, yeah.  But a lot of his score will rest on our (The Dees) midfield getting first hands on the ball.  If Hannebery, Jack, JPK,TMitch, Parker et al dominate then his score wont be as big as some think. Quite happy to be proven wrong though  ;D

Other rucks have scored well against Sydney this year. I checked them out during the week, can't be bothered to do it again to post here but a few 100-120 type scores. If Danger fails I'll take that from Max.

Gawn's BE isn't awfully low though, if he goes 110 I won't be too concerned, albeit an unders score from Gunston puts me on The back foot.

[WizzFizz]

Ugh.
The Hopper->Jansen is so tempting, but does that make the Hopper inclusion against weak opposition a waste?

I'm also waiting on Gawn with Nat, both have byes next week and I have a bad feeling he won't perform against Sydney.

Gawn will kill it against Sydney's second string rucks.  8)

He'll get plenty of hit-outs, yeah.  But a lot of his score will rest on our (The Dees) midfield getting first hands on the ball.  If Hannebery, Jack, JPK,TMitch, Parker et al dominate then his score wont be as big as some think. Quite happy to be proven wrong though  ;D

Other rucks have scored well against Sydney this year. I checked them out during the week, can't be bothered to do it again to post here but a few 100-120 type scores. If Danger fails I'll take that from Max.

Gawn's BE isn't awfully low though, if he goes 110 I won't be too concerned, albeit an unders score from Gunston puts me on The back foot.

gawn only got 4 hitouts to adv and had many sharked against the pies mids, that is what crushed his expected 150+ score.

His hitouts may be sharked vs the elite swans mids and a sharked hitout is -1 so unless he can get outside midfield numbers like last week I expect an 70-90 score

[crowls]

Ugh.
The Hopper->Jansen is so tempting, but does that make the Hopper inclusion against weak opposition a waste?

I'm also waiting on Gawn with Nat, both have byes next week and I have a bad feeling he won't perform against Sydney.

Gawn will kill it against Sydney's second string rucks.  8)

He'll get plenty of hit-outs, yeah.  But a lot of his score will rest on our (The Dees) midfield getting first hands on the ball.  If Hannebery, Jack, JPK,TMitch, Parker et al dominate then his score wont be as big as some think. Quite happy to be proven wrong though  ;D

Other rucks have scored well against Sydney this year. I checked them out during the week, can't be bothered to do it again to post here but a few 100-120 type scores. If Danger fails I'll take that from Max.

Gawn's BE isn't awfully low though, if he goes 110 I won't be too concerned, albeit an unders score from Gunston puts me on The back foot.

gawn only got 4 hitouts to adv and had many sharked against the pies mids, that is what crushed his expected 150+ score.

His hitouts may be sharked vs the elite swans mids and a sharked hitout is -1 so unless he can get outside midfield numbers like last week I expect an 70-90 score

Anything 90+ will be good for Gawn against Sydney.   Certainly is not in my C options.

[Grufflez]

Ugh.
The Hopper->Jansen is so tempting, but does that make the Hopper inclusion against weak opposition a waste?

I'm also waiting on Gawn with Nat, both have byes next week and I have a bad feeling he won't perform against Sydney.

Gawn will kill it against Sydney's second string rucks.  8)

He'll get plenty of hit-outs, yeah.  But a lot of his score will rest on our (The Dees) midfield getting first hands on the ball.  If Hannebery, Jack, JPK,TMitch, Parker et al dominate then his score wont be as big as some think. Quite happy to be proven wrong though  ;D

Other rucks have scored well against Sydney this year. I checked them out during the week, can't be bothered to do it again to post here but a few 100-120 type scores. If Danger fails I'll take that from Max.

Gawn's BE isn't awfully low though, if he goes 110 I won't be too concerned, albeit an unders score from Gunston puts me on The back foot.

Gunnah, the old Gunstarooney
Never been so happy to see a sc score of 50 in my life!
With 6 touches i thought for sure he was gonna score in the 20's.

I barely saw him or Bruest the entire game lol

[LF]

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-06-18/final-teams-round-13

Guthrie out for the Cats,Gregson comes in for him

[Gigantor]

AFL ‏@AFL  10m10 minutes ago
No late changes to either the @sydneyswans or @melbournefc for this afternoon’s clash. #AFLSwansDees

[AaronKirk]

I now only have 17 this weekend

FOX FOOTY LIVE
@FOXFootyLive
Late change for Essendon in #AFLDonsGiants as Matt Dea goes out replaced by Jason Ashby. GWS unchanged.