AF Who to field RD 4

Ricochet · April 24, 2015, 11:42:11 AM

Probably more crucial in AF than SC with no rolling lockout.

Which selections are you struggling with?

Mine is:
Fielding 3 of vanders, Cripps, Newton, Sheed, CEY

Atm I have CEY, vanders and Cripps. But unsure on Cripps vs Newton/Sheed

jvalles69 · April 24, 2015, 11:45:18 AM

Quote from: Ricochet on April 24, 2015, 11:42:11 AM
Probably more crucial in AF than SC with no rolling lockout.

Which selections are you struggling with?

Mine is:
Fielding 3 of vanders, Cripps, Newton, Sheed, CEY

Atm I have CEY, vanders and Cripps. But unsure on Cripps vs Newton/Sheed

I'm fielding CEY, Vanders and Cripps too. Newton has been dropping off and if both play full games which is likely I would take Vanders over Newton based on what I've seen. Cripps is going to be good, I locked him on my field last week and wasn't disappointed. Trade Sheed, sux donkey balls!

Ricochet · April 24, 2015, 11:47:33 AM

Quote from: jvalles69 on April 24, 2015, 11:45:18 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 24, 2015, 11:42:11 AM
Probably more crucial in AF than SC with no rolling lockout.

Which selections are you struggling with?

Mine is:
Fielding 3 of vanders, Cripps, Newton, Sheed, CEY

Atm I have CEY, vanders and Cripps. But unsure on Cripps vs Newton/Sheed

I'm fielding CEY, Vanders and Cripps too. Newton has been dropping off and if both play full games which is likely I would take Vanders over Newton based on what I've seen. Cripps is going to be good, I locked him on my field last week and wasn't disappointed. Trade Sheed, sux donkey balls!

Haha Sheed was ok last week with 74 in a thrashing. Should do better against Brissie and has GWS after that.

jvalles69 · April 24, 2015, 12:03:34 PM

Quote from: Ricochet on April 24, 2015, 11:47:33 AM
Quote from: jvalles69 on April 24, 2015, 11:45:18 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on April 24, 2015, 11:42:11 AM
Probably more crucial in AF than SC with no rolling lockout.

Which selections are you struggling with?

Mine is:
Fielding 3 of vanders, Cripps, Newton, Sheed, CEY

Atm I have CEY, vanders and Cripps. But unsure on Cripps vs Newton/Sheed

I'm fielding CEY, Vanders and Cripps too. Newton has been dropping off and if both play full games which is likely I would take Vanders over Newton based on what I've seen. Cripps is going to be good, I locked him on my field last week and wasn't disappointed. Trade Sheed, sux donkey balls!
Haha Sheed was ok last week with 74 in a thrashing. Should do better against Brissie and has GWS after that.

Was shocked at the 74, virtually goes unsited during games, does no damage, and is lucky WC has so many injuries because he wouldn't be getting a game otherwise.

LF · April 24, 2015, 12:12:34 PM

I have moved Cripps on field Newton to bench and am tossing up between Vanders and CEY.
Down forward really tempted to chuck McCarthy on field for Salem or Clark.

jvalles69 · April 24, 2015, 12:21:27 PM

Quote from: LF on April 24, 2015, 12:12:34 PM
I have moved Cripps on field Newton to bench and am tossing up between Vanders and CEY.
Down forward really tempted to chuck McCarthy on field for Salem or Clark.

Those 3 forwards are definitely the toughest to pick!

Thunderbolts · April 24, 2015, 12:54:59 PM

Im playing Cripps, CEY and Vanders as Em while Benny sits on the pine.

Mr.Craig · April 24, 2015, 01:27:45 PM

Currently CEY/Vanders with Newton/Sinclair on bench.

Forward I'm fielding Clark/McCarthy ahead of Salem but might change my mind.

Grannyboy · April 24, 2015, 02:21:32 PM

Quote from: Mr.Craig on April 24, 2015, 01:27:45 PM
Currently CEY/Vanders with Newton/Sinclair on bench.

Forward I'm fielding Clark/McCarthy ahead of Salem but might change my mind.

Clark high score in the nab 115, Salem 116 if I remember correctly. McCarthy hasn't gone past 70-odd yet but is consistent. Salem plays through the middle the other 2 don't really. But having said that McCarthy's opponents, GC, have looked ordinary for 3 weeks now. North and the Tiges have been much better.
So has that confused you even more now? ;D In the words of Homer (the cartoon not the philosopher) "Oh confused would we?" ???

Mr.Craig · April 24, 2015, 02:46:47 PM

McCarthy is so close to a big score and GC have conceded an average of 72.9 per player in the first 3 rounds so I think it's worth giving him a crack at it.

Grannyboy · April 24, 2015, 03:55:55 PM

Quote from: Mr.Craig on April 24, 2015, 02:46:47 PM
McCarthy is so close to a big score and GC have conceded an average of 72.9 per player in the first 3 rounds so I think it's worth giving him a crack at it.

Unless he's going to become a cop or a pool cleaner he really needs to shave of the mo first, big scores will follow. :P

jvalles69 · April 24, 2015, 04:48:19 PM

I've got Honeychurch on field ahead of Salem at this stage.

jvalles69 · April 24, 2015, 09:00:31 PM

Glad I started vanders over Newton!

Mr.Craig · April 25, 2015, 11:14:30 PM

Quote from: Mr.Craig on April 24, 2015, 02:46:47 PM
McCarthy is so close to a big score and GC have conceded an average of 72.9 per player in the first 3 rounds so I think it's worth giving him a crack at it.

About the only good call I've made this weekend.

LF · April 26, 2015, 12:27:23 AM

Quote from: Mr.Craig on April 25, 2015, 11:14:30 PM
Quote from: Mr.Craig on April 24, 2015, 02:46:47 PM
McCarthy is so close to a big score and GC have conceded an average of 72.9 per player in the first 3 rounds so I think it's worth giving him a crack at it.

About the only good call I've made this weekend.

McCarthy,Vanders and Cripps all on field 8)
Let's see what Clark does now with Lonie and Salem on my bench