Nathan Freeman

[whoislids1]

I have Nathan Freeman sitting on my midfield bench at the moment gathering dust. However, a Collingwood injury crisis has meant that the kid has a fair crack at getting a game this weekend. Now, before this weekend I had planned to offload the kid and get in a rookie that is actually making cash (Aaron VandenBerg). However, with him actually looking like getting a game I was thinking of trading out another rook to get in the Demons' cash-machine (Cripps, Miller).

The question i put to you gents is: even if Nathan Freeman is named on the team-sheet tomorrow, do I keep him? He is still at least 3 weeks away from making any money, he doesn't have huge points potential (on NAB form, one game) and the only reason he is getting a run is because of a drugs scandal and an injury crisis (making me think that he has about the worst JS in the world). I either get rid of him, Cripps or Miller to bring in VandenBerg, any will do.

[RaisyDaisy]

Strong chance to line up this week, and considering it's hard to do any worse than Miller, I would trade Miller to Vanders and keep Freeman

[Mark]

Will play this week according to Nick Maxwell... But lets wait and see

[GCSkiwi]

Collingwood play the first game so I'd say if Freeman is playing and not the sub then keep him, and trade Miller. If he's not in the team, trade him. If he's the sub you have a harder call to make, because with Ablett out maybe Miller might see more game time? But also good chance he'll stay the sub too... in ehich case it's a coin flip on who might break out of having the vest...