GM's Journey 2015

Started by GM, January 11, 2015, 08:30:42 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

_wato

Quote from: Money Shot on February 07, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
I think Selwood is going to average 115-120 and I think that is enough to be a keeper. Can see why people wont be starting him but I think he will easily be a top 8 mid and don't see why people are concerned about him.

Easily enough to be a keeper, will be a top 5 mid once again, he is one of the three super premiums (in and out every year)
Only reason I have decided to take him out for now is his first 7 games (Haw, Freo, Syd, NM, Coll, GC, Rich) where he averages 114 against, and the past two years his first half of the year average has been a considerable distance from the second half of the year
/ 2014 (117 -> 126) | 2013 (107 -> 129) \ and as stated above, he is prone to go through a patch and reach $550k or less.
$650k is a hefty price tag to start the year, and there's only two players I'd do that for and that's Ablett and Pendlebury (way too much value elsewhere)

GM

Quote from: _wato on February 07, 2015, 04:47:59 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 07, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
I think Selwood is going to average 115-120 and I think that is enough to be a keeper. Can see why people wont be starting him but I think he will easily be a top 8 mid and don't see why people are concerned about him.

Easily enough to be a keeper, will be a top 5 mid once again, he is one of the three super premiums (in and out every year)
Only reason I have decided to take him out for now is his first 7 games (Haw, Freo, Syd, NM, Coll, GC, Rich) where he averages 114 against, and the past two years his first half of the year average has been a considerable distance from the second half of the year
/ 2014 (117 -> 126) | 2013 (107 -> 129) \ and as stated above, he is prone to go through a patch and reach $550k or less.
$650k is a hefty price tag to start the year, and there's only two players I'd do that for and that's Ablett and Pendlebury (way too much value elsewhere)
Great work mate.
Will think about it.
The idea though of waiting till premos bottom out , then bring them in.
Just sonetimes doesn't work out due to managing other lines where injuries hit.

Money Shot

Quote from: GM on February 07, 2015, 05:25:27 PM
Quote from: _wato on February 07, 2015, 04:47:59 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 07, 2015, 04:35:10 PM
I think Selwood is going to average 115-120 and I think that is enough to be a keeper. Can see why people wont be starting him but I think he will easily be a top 8 mid and don't see why people are concerned about him.

Easily enough to be a keeper, will be a top 5 mid once again, he is one of the three super premiums (in and out every year)
Only reason I have decided to take him out for now is his first 7 games (Haw, Freo, Syd, NM, Coll, GC, Rich) where he averages 114 against, and the past two years his first half of the year average has been a considerable distance from the second half of the year
/ 2014 (117 -> 126) | 2013 (107 -> 129) \ and as stated above, he is prone to go through a patch and reach $550k or less.
$650k is a hefty price tag to start the year, and there's only two players I'd do that for and that's Ablett and Pendlebury (way too much value elsewhere)
Great work mate.
Will think about it.
The idea though of waiting till premos bottom out , then bring them in.
Just sonetimes doesn't work out due to managing other lines where injuries hit.

Is there a way to work out what an average of 110 would do to him after say 10 rounds?

GM

#33
My starting line up

Backs   Simpson , Gibson , Newnes , Lamumba , Goodes ,     
              McIntosh  , Brown , Oxley

Mids     Ablett , Fyfe , Pendles , Selwood , Cripps , Heeney ,
              Saad , Ellis- Yoeman , Vberg , Cockatoo , Miller

Rucks   Goldy , Belly , Read

Fwds    Gray , Bartel , Martin , Bennell , Salem , Clarke
              Hogan , Lamb

Ringo

No real newed to trade this week GM as you do not have Rocky or Sidey.  Monitor Bartel though can afford to sit him on the pine if need be.

GM

Yes Ringo.
No trades this week.
A couple of disappointments this week  ie Jelwood.
But overall no disasters and off to reasonable start 2065.
Expected a better rank than 20k , but will hopefully climb this week.

The_Captain

Quote from: GM on April 07, 2015, 11:54:39 AM
Yes Ringo.
No trades this week.
A couple of disappointments this week  ie Jelwood.
But overall no disasters and off to reasonable start 2065.
Expected a better rank than 20k , but will hopefully climb this week.

Similar side to mine. No trades needed for me either. I thought i started okay with 1984, considering carnage this round... .. Ranked 50k. Sucks.