2019 Rookies

[Mat0369]

Really surprised Miers is only in 4.1% of teams tbh.

Rock solid JS at the moment, second most ground covered by any Cat last night, and once the 35 from rd1 is out of his cycle he'll make some quickfire cash.

Won't be a huge scorer, but 83 and 69 last two is pretty good for 123K

If Balta flops this week he might be a sideways option. How much is he expected to make?

[GoldDigger]

Really surprised Miers is only in 4.1% of teams tbh.

Rock solid JS at the moment, second most ground covered by any Cat last night, and once the 35 from rd1 is out of his cycle he'll make some quickfire cash.

Won't be a huge scorer, but 83 and 69 last two is pretty good for 123K

If Balta flops this week he might be a sideways option. How much is he expected to make?

Look it up ...http://tooserious.net/forum/stats.php#E9PqfxG4J7Sezvjq.97

[js19]

Really surprised Miers is only in 4.1% of teams tbh.

Rock solid JS at the moment, second most ground covered by any Cat last night, and once the 35 from rd1 is out of his cycle he'll make some quickfire cash.

Won't be a huge scorer, but 83 and 69 last two is pretty good for 123K

If Balta flops this week he might be a sideways option. How much is he expected to make?

He'll make around 52k this week and expected another 50k-ish with a score of 60 next round

[quinny88]

I thought he was a sure thing to come back in to replace May but he's not even named as an emergency so may have to pull the trigger on Hore > Scrim

Hold tight until Scrim is in for sure though!

Definitel!  have made that mistake before haha

[Mat0369]

Look it up ...http://tooserious.net/forum/stats.php#E9PqfxG4J7Sezvjq.97

Those calcs are a piece of crap. SC Gold has the projected prices which I don't have and I assume most use.

He'll make around 52k this week and expected another 50k-ish with a score of 60 next round

Hmm, not really worth it since you need to probably find the 50k to turn Balta into Miers anyway. In a small forward role I'd expect a couple 30's in that rotation quick enough. Good pick by those that started him or grabbed him this week.

[GoldDigger]

Those calcs are a piece of crap. SC Gold has the projected prices which I don't have and I assume most use.

Evidence?

[Mat0369]

Evidence?

Use it now and then check how much Miers actually goes up in price. It will be wrong. That's your evidence.

[js19]

Those calcs are a piece of crap. SC Gold has the projected prices which I don't have and I assume most use.

Evidence?

Miers:
SC Gold BE -48
TooSerious BE -46
SC Gold predicted price rise (score 60) $48.8K
TooSerious predicted price rise (score 60) $35.5

TooSerious is $13.3K off in this one calc, or over 27%

[GoldDigger]

Evidence?

Use it now and then check how much Miers actually goes up in price. It will be wrong. That's your evidence.

Sounds a bit like the proof of our coalition policies is in the promise that "we will present a budget surplus NEXT year IF we are elected!
Total BS! Evidence is the BASIS for prediction, NOT the prediction.

[GoldDigger]

Those calcs are a piece of crap. SC Gold has the projected prices which I don't have and I assume most use.

Evidence?

Miers:
SC Gold BE -48
TooSerious BE -46
SC Gold predicted price rise (score 60) $48.8K
TooSerious predicted price rise (score 60) $35.5

TooSerious is $13.3K off in this one calc, or over 27%

So I guess we take it that Gold is correct?

[js19]

Those calcs are a piece of crap. SC Gold has the projected prices which I don't have and I assume most use.

Evidence?

Miers:
SC Gold BE -48
TooSerious BE -46
SC Gold predicted price rise (score 60) $48.8K
TooSerious predicted price rise (score 60) $35.5

TooSerious is $13.3K off in this one calc, or over 27%

So I guess we take it that Gold is correct?

Gold is the basis and background of the actual system and uses the algorithms included therein, so pending major changes to the magic number, yes, Gold is correct

[sammy123]

Glad i got in constable

[Mat0369]

Total BS! Evidence is the BASIS for prediction, NOT the prediction.

Miers:
SC Gold BE -48
TooSerious BE -46
SC Gold predicted price rise (score 60) $48.8K
TooSerious predicted price rise (score 60) $35.5

TooSerious is $13.3K off in this one calc, or over 27%
So I guess we take it that Gold is correct?

You were saying?

Gold is the basis and background of the actual system and uses the algorithms included therein, so pending major changes to the magic number, yes, Gold is correct

Correct. I had Gold for a couple of years with my Foxtel subscription. Tooserious was always wrong when comparing. You get a basic idea but 35k is a huge difference to 50k. Thanks for that mate.

[LaHug]

I don't have Hore in SC so I'm fine there but I have him in DT... Here's my problem. I have Hore and Greene in DT, I gave Danger the VC but Fort is my usual 0 and I can't use him for loophole this week. If I hold Hore or Greene, I can get Danger's score. If I use Hore, I have to take Clark's score over Scrimshaw to loop Danger. If I use Greene, I can't loop Setters against Petrucelle (was probably going to trade Greene to Rozee anyway). There's no rookie in Fwd or Def that I'm missing other than Rozee unless we think Powell is worthwhile, so there's no double trade worth making (I have no spare cash to upgrade). Do I keep Hore even though he's not likely to play anytime soon? I can't afford Hore to Rozee straight up either...

[Mat0369]

I'd want to take the Danger captain score so I'd keep Hore. Scrimshaw probably scores 10 more max but you could make that up in the captains score easy.

Greene to Rozee, move Rozee back next week and grab a rookie up forward next week