2019 Rookies

Started by quinny88, November 22, 2018, 10:53:37 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Bones Bombers

Collins or Scrimshaw???

batt

Looking at going (in order):

B: Collins, Clark, Duursma, Burgess, Hore
M: Walsh, Constable, Drew, Scott, Gibbons
F: Setterfield, Petruccelle, Balta, Parker

Locinator

A debate a few will be having in the next hour...

Gibbons vs Hind (named on extended bench)

RaisyDaisy

I reckon I might take Scrimshaw over Collins and bank the 40k

batt

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2019, 06:31:25 PM
I reckon I might take Scrimshaw over Collins and bank the 40k
Would be silly to pass up the JS Collins has IMO.

jfitty

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2019, 06:31:25 PM
I reckon I might take Scrimshaw over Collins and bank the 40k

I considered this, but just can't see where I'd use the 40k at this stage.

Thinking of playing it safe with Collins..

Bones Bombers

Quote from: batt on March 21, 2019, 06:32:55 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2019, 06:31:25 PM
I reckon I might take Scrimshaw over Collins and bank the 40k
Would be silly to pass up the JS Collins has IMO.
We can always start Collins and correction trade down to Scrimshaw if necessary.

Bones Bombers

Quote from: jfitty on March 21, 2019, 06:35:03 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2019, 06:31:25 PM
I reckon I might take Scrimshaw over Collins and bank the 40k

I considered this, but just can't see where I'd use the 40k at this stage.

Thinking of playing it safe with Collins..
I only have $2,700 in the bank so if I did it I would keep the money in the bank haha

Samsturmfels

pick burgess instead of hore? Whats everyones thoughts on Hore possibly getting dropped for May?

hawkers65

Atkins v Gibbons is gonna be an interesting choice

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2019, 06:38:49 PM
Atkins v Gibbons is gonna be an interesting choice

Both for me at M10 and M11

As for Collins vs Scrim, I have my side set nicely and can fit Scrim, would need to make a chance somewhere to fit Collins and don't think I want to

Have Moore fwd too, so have the cover just in case

hawkers65

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2019, 06:40:24 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2019, 06:38:49 PM
Atkins v Gibbons is gonna be an interesting choice

Both for me at M10 and M11

As for Collins vs Scrim, I have my side set nicely and can fit Scrim, would need to make a chance somewhere to fit Collins and don't think I want to

Have Moore fwd too, so have the cover just in case

Do you not have Scott or one of Butters/Hately?

RaisyDaisy

Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2019, 06:41:35 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2019, 06:40:24 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2019, 06:38:49 PM
Atkins v Gibbons is gonna be an interesting choice

Both for me at M10 and M11

As for Collins vs Scrim, I have my side set nicely and can fit Scrim, would need to make a chance somewhere to fit Collins and don't think I want to

Have Moore fwd too, so have the cover just in case

Do you not have Scott or one of Butters/Hately?

Walsh M7, then Constable, Scott, Atkins, Gibbons

Need to spend more on def rookies this year, so happy to pass on Butters/Hately

Locinator

Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2019, 06:40:24 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2019, 06:38:49 PM
Atkins v Gibbons is gonna be an interesting choice

Both for me at M10 and M11


Also running both, with Walsh, Butters, Constable on field, Scott on the pine

LordSneeze

Quote from: Locinator on March 21, 2019, 06:44:58 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2019, 06:40:24 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 21, 2019, 06:38:49 PM
Atkins v Gibbons is gonna be an interesting choice

Both for me at M10 and M11


Also running both, with Walsh, Butters, Constable on field, Scott on the pine
Sounds like my mid.

Doubt Clarke will get up given tge Essendon extended bench