2019 Rookies

[GoLions]

wonder if its smart starting bailey if ur starting libba and macrae to

so atleast bailey plays if libba or macrae miss etc

im starting hately with conigs for same reason

You dont pay 180k or 150k for either if you dony think both play with all those guys healthy.

Having macrae or libba should not influence your decision on smith

Exactly this^

[kilbluff1985]

dont misunderstand me i never said i dont expect baley to play with them

i expect him to play with them

but if one of libba/macrae misses then less chance sbaley might get dropped if he had a bad game maybe

why would i start him if i dont expect him to play with libba and macrae

[Holz]

dont misunderstand me i never said i dont expect baley to play with them

i expect him to play with them

but if one of libba/macrae misses then less chance sbaley might get dropped if he had a bad game maybe

why would i start him if i dont expect him to play with libba and macrae

It shouldn't influence your decision at all.

[GoLions]

dont misunderstand me i never said i dont expect baley to play with them

i expect him to play with them

but if one of libba/macrae misses then less chance sbaley might get dropped if he had a bad game maybe

why would i start him if i dont expect him to play with libba and macrae

It shouldn't influence your decision at all.

If say Libba gets a 3 week injury and someone comes in for him and performs well, then when he returns Smith could easily be dropped. Basically if Smith goes well then he'll hold his spot, if he doesn't then he'll get dropped. Macrae and Libba won't change that.

[eaglesman]

dont misunderstand me i never said i dont expect baley to play with them

i expect him to play with them

but if one of libba/macrae misses then less chance sbaley might get dropped if he had a bad game maybe

why would i start him if i dont expect him to play with libba and macrae

Think what you say has merit.
Less chance to be dropped plus potentially more scoring potential as well.

[_wato]

With caldwell out for a few weeks surely that makes Hately a lock.

Butters > Smith is tempting. Get rid of Gibbons

[eaglesman]

I found an extra $110k. By fielding Duursma over Ridley.

Brayshaw > Dusty

One of gibbons Atkins Scott Constable > bailey smith.
Walsh and butters non Negotiable starters for me.

Happy days.

[_wato]

I found an extra $110k. By fielding Duursma over Ridley.

Brayshaw > Dusty

One of gibbons Atkins Scott Constable > bailey smith.
Walsh and butters non Negotiable starters for me.

Happy days.

Nice. I'm going hately over smith as I see similar scoring and with Caldwell out hoping Hately gets a real good run at it like Taranto did.

Walsh, Butters, Hately, Constable, Scott my mid rooks. Atkins and Gibbons are cheap but that small forward role does nothing for me. If Gibbons somehow does something incredible can always DG as he is basement price.

[eaglesman]

I found an extra $110k. By fielding Duursma over Ridley.

Brayshaw > Dusty

One of gibbons Atkins Scott Constable > bailey smith.
Walsh and butters non Negotiable starters for me.

Happy days.

Nice. I'm going hately over smith as I see similar scoring and with Caldwell out hoping Hately gets a real good run at it like Taranto did.

Walsh, Butters, Hately, Constable, Scott my mid rooks. Atkins and Gibbons are cheap but that small forward role does nothing for me. If Gibbons somehow does something incredible can always DG as he is basement price.

Look if hateley is named the I agree I’ll drop both Atkins and gibbons and take smith and hateley with Walsh butters Scott  and Constable

[LaHug]

Anyone looking back at Gibbons now that Fasolo's going to play as well? Does that push Gibbons into the mids or at least the flank?

[kilbluff1985]

Anyone looking back at Gibbons now that Fasolo's going to play as well? Does that push Gibbons into the mids or at least the flank?

don't really care about his role for his price

[Money Shot]

Anyone looking back at Gibbons now that Fasolo's going to play as well? Does that push Gibbons into the mids or at least the flank?

don't really care about his role for his price

+1

All he needs is one decent game 70+ which doesn’t seem impossible. And he’ll make decent money. Locked at M11.

I think Gibbons will still play predomitely forward for what it’s worth.

[RichoMan94]

Thoughts on James Cousins at rookie price? Seems destined from JLT to start in midfield for hawks and Clarkson in AFL interview has gone on to say him and Worpel will get chance in midfield with T Mitch out

[LaHug]

Thoughts on James Cousins at rookie price? Seems destined from JLT to start in midfield for hawks and Clarkson in AFL interview has gone on to say him and Worpel will get chance in midfield with T Mitch out

I've got him in RDT but can't find the funds to get him in for SC.

[jvalles69]

Thoughts on James Cousins at rookie price? Seems destined from JLT to start in midfield for hawks and Clarkson in AFL interview has gone on to say him and Worpel will get chance in midfield with T Mitch out

I've got him in RDT but can't find the funds to get him in for SC.

I feel like to have Cousins you'd almost have to have him in place for either Walsh or Libba.  Not going to replace Walsh, but can he get close to what Libba can do?  If so you'd have to consider it... ???