2019 Rookies

[hawkers65]

Who's everyone starting at M8 this week? Butters, Con or Scott? I think i'm gonna go Scott.

Assuming Walsh is M7, yeah? I've got Butters at the moment but will likely change about 10 times...

Yeah of course. I feel like Butters is your guy that costs 40k more so you feel inclined to start R1 cause you've paid up but ends up scoring less.

[LaHug]

Who's everyone starting at M8 this week? Butters, Con or Scott? I think i'm gonna go Scott.

Assuming Walsh is M7, yeah? I've got Butters at the moment but will likely change about 10 times...

Yeah of course. I feel like Butters is your guy that costs 40k more so you feel inclined to start R1 cause you've paid up but ends up scoring less.

You're probably right. Might even be a matchup thing for starters. You'd usually pick the rookie against GC, Carlton, or St Kilda but not against whoever ends up being the stingy teams this year. North has a friendlier matchup than Geelong and Port do.

[frenzy]

Who's everyone starting at M8 this week? Butters, Con or Scott? I think i'm gonna go Scott.

Assuming Walsh is M7, yeah? I've got Butters at the moment but will likely change about 10 times...

Yeah of course. I feel like Butters is your guy that costs 40k more so you feel inclined to start R1 cause you've paid up but ends up scoring less.

the Butters that went 91 and 82 in the JLT,  :o not good enough to start?

[hawkers65]

Who's everyone starting at M8 this week? Butters, Con or Scott? I think i'm gonna go Scott.

Assuming Walsh is M7, yeah? I've got Butters at the moment but will likely change about 10 times...

Yeah of course. I feel like Butters is your guy that costs 40k more so you feel inclined to start R1 cause you've paid up but ends up scoring less.

the Butters that went 91 and 82 in the JLT,  :o not good enough to start?

Lets be real, he aint kicking 3 goals against Melb in Melb as a small forward. Scott also scored 89 SC in far less TOG that same game ;)

[Money Shot]

Constable, Scott, Atkins and Gibbons are my M8-M11 (not interested in Butters)

I think I’ll be starting Scott.

[RaisyDaisy]

Constable, Scott, Atkins and Gibbons are my M8-M11 (not interested in Butters)

I think I’ll be starting Scott

+1 same 4 for me and not interested in Butters either

Constable/Scott for M8 - leaning towards Constable first up

That said, if I need to restructure due to unexpected outs, then I might have to push Walsh back to M6 and field both of them at 7 and 8

[eaglesman]

Has Scott been confirmed has he? A lot of people assuming they will be starting him here

[hawkers65]

Constable, Scott, Atkins and Gibbons are my M8-M11 (not interested in Butters)

I think I’ll be starting Scott

+1 same 4 for me and not interested in Butters either

Constable/Scott for M8 - leaning towards Constable first up

That said, if I need to restructure due to unexpected outs, then I might have to push Walsh back to M6 and field both of them at 7 and 8

Butters has far better JS than Constable/Atkins/Scott. When you say "you're not interested" is it cause you dont have an extra 40k left over right now? Would be pretty stupid to say you're not interested if you had the cash.

[RaisyDaisy]

Constable, Scott, Atkins and Gibbons are my M8-M11 (not interested in Butters)

I think I’ll be starting Scott

+1 same 4 for me and not interested in Butters either

Constable/Scott for M8 - leaning towards Constable first up

That said, if I need to restructure due to unexpected outs, then I might have to push Walsh back to M6 and field both of them at 7 and 8

Butters has far better JS than Constable/Atkins/Scott. When you say "you're not interested" is it cause you dont have an extra 40k left over right now? Would be pretty stupid to say you're not interested if you had the cash.

They're all just cash cows to me - I get a higher ROI on the cheaper guys, and I think most of them will match or score better than Butters

I think they all have similar JS. Butters might have better, but the others I feel should still be good enough for what I need

[Holz]

I think if Hately is named you got to go him. Big bodied and i reckon is ready for afl, should be able to hold up better then Butters the only issue is GWS v Port.

[RaisyDaisy]

I think if Hately is named you got to go him. Big bodied and i reckon is ready for afl, should be able to hold up better then Butters the only issue is GWS v Port.

And this too

I might need to drop a mid prem and bring in another rookie

If that's the case, it's Hately - Caldwell - Butters for me, in terms of those pricer options (Assuming GWS are full strength and 1 of them still gets named)

Don't hate the Butters pick, but just not one I am personally interested in

[Nige]

Hinkley confirmed that Drew, Butters, Rozee and Duursma and debuting Round 1.

Imagine if someone said this weeks ago.

[Rusty00]

Hinkley confirmed that Drew, Butters, Rozee and Duursma and debuting Round 1.

Imagine if someone said this weeks ago.

They would have been rubbished and booed out of the forums ;)

[Money Shot]

Constable, Scott, Atkins and Gibbons are my M8-M11 (not interested in Butters)

I think I’ll be starting Scott

+1 same 4 for me and not interested in Butters either

Constable/Scott for M8 - leaning towards Constable first up

That said, if I need to restructure due to unexpected outs, then I might have to push Walsh back to M6 and field both of them at 7 and 8

Butters has far better JS than Constable/Atkins/Scott. When you say "you're not interested" is it cause you dont have an extra 40k left over right now? Would be pretty stupid to say you're not interested if you had the cash.

They're all just cash cows to me - I get a higher ROI on the cheaper guys, and I think most of them will match or score better than Butters

I think they all have similar JS. Butters might have better, but the others I feel should still be good enough for what I need

I think Constable and Scott are going to score higher than him. Atkins and Gibbons are heaps cheaper and have better JS in my opinion.

[frenzy]

Who's everyone starting at M8 this week? Butters, Con or Scott? I think i'm gonna go Scott.

Assuming Walsh is M7, yeah? I've got Butters at the moment but will likely change about 10 times...

Yeah of course. I feel like Butters is your guy that costs 40k more so you feel inclined to start R1 cause you've paid up but ends up scoring less.

the Butters that went 91 and 82 in the JLT,  :o not good enough to start?

Lets be real, he aint kicking 3 goals against Melb in Melb as a small forward. Scott also scored 89 SC in far less TOG that same game ;)

I  was looking at the adelaide game ( no goals and quality opposition ) but 16% extra against NM could be looked at as far more time on the ground. I think it's more a case of price $