2019 Rookies

[RaisyDaisy]

It would not surprise me at all to see Marsh named for the saints. Hasn't played at the top level since 2016 BUT has been playing a decent grade of footy.
In the month of June, the year he was drafted by the Pies, I remember reading an article he would go in the top 15 kids in the nation.
When he was at the Pies I liked the little I saw in him but he never really got a good go at it.
Hope he grabs this second chance he has been given.

pass, Brown is back round 2

Two completely different players. Brown returning shouldn't impact Marsh at all

[frenzy]

ppl starting 2 or 3 defender rookies on field are crazy have seen some teams with this

u want Collins at d5 imo

Collins at d7 for me today, chucking Scrimshaw on the scrapheap

[GoldDigger]

ppl starting 2 or 3 defender rookies on field are crazy have seen some teams with this

u want Collins at d5 imo

If Collins is at D5, isn't there a second rookie at D6?

[kilbluff1985]

ppl starting 2 or 3 defender rookies on field are crazy have seen some teams with this

u want Collins at d5 imo

If Collins is at D5, isn't there a second rookie at D6?

most dont consider Collins a rookie

[imjusflexin]

I'd rather play an extra rookie on field than a trap like Brodie Smith or Ridley or something..

[GoldDigger]

... most dont consider Collins a rookie

Well stone the crows and pull my beard and call me Honey!

[Money Shot]

ppl starting 2 or 3 defender rookies on field are crazy have seen some teams with this

u want Collins at d5 imo

Scrimshaw, Clark, Duursma (Burgess (DPP w/ Moore), Hore)

I’m pretty content on this set up.

All seem to have relatively good job security.

Scrimshaw is a bit concerning with what Clarko said today but I think he’s a decent chance.

[batt]

I'd rather play an extra rookie on field than a trap like Brodie Smith or Ridley or something..

^^

Not saying they will be traps... but the prospect of a trap.

Scrimshaw, Clark, Duursma (Burgess (DPP w/ Moore), Hore)

I’m pretty content on this set up.

All seem to have relatively good job security.

Scrimshaw is a bit concerning with what Clarko said today but I think he’s a decent chance.

^^

But Collins for Scrimshaw pending teams

[GoldDigger]

... most dont consider Collins a rookie

Well stone the crows and pull my beard and call me Honey!

I see that he's a "mature aged state-league concession" ...wtf?

[kilbluff1985]

b smith probably averages 40 more then most defender rookies who generally average 40-50 good luck find8ing better use for that 150-200k

[GoldDigger]

b smith probably averages 40 more then most defender rookies who generally average 40-50 good luck find8ing better use for that 150-200k

... but surely very few would put such a low scoring rookie on field?

[kilbluff1985]

b smith probably averages 40 more then most defender rookies who generally average 40-50 good luck find8ing better use for that 150-200k

... but surely very few would put such a low scoring rookie on field?

even clark or duur will score below 50 often they will be onfield in many teams

[TomK]

ppl starting 2 or 3 defender rookies on field are crazy have seen some teams with this

u want Collins at d5 imo

Scrimshaw, Clark, Duursma (Burgess (DPP w/ Moore), Hore)

I’m pretty content on this set up.

All seem to have relatively good job security.

Scrimshaw is a bit concerning with what Clarko said today but I think he’s a decent chance.

lol

How can Scrimshaw have good job security after Clarko's comments today? And Hore doesn't have good JS whatsoever.

[imjusflexin]

b smith probably averages 40 more then most defender rookies who generally average 40-50 good luck find8ing better use for that 150-200k

... but surely very few would put such a low scoring rookie on field?

even clark or duur will score below 50 often they will be onfield in many teams

May I ask your FWD setup? if you have Grundy & Gawn? How many premo mids you have? Sure ideally we'd all like less DEF rookies on field but it's not like the other positions have great rookie options jumping out to be picked and there's only so much $$ to go around.

EDIT: Just had a go at turning Hore into Smith.. had to downgrade Fyfe & Conigs to M. Crouch & Steele... don't like it.

[kilbluff1985]

b smith probably averages 40 more then most defender rookies who generally average 40-50 good luck find8ing better use for that 150-200k

... but surely very few would put such a low scoring rookie on field?

even clark or duur will score below 50 often they will be onfield in many teams

May I ask your FWD setup? if you have Grundy & Gawn? How many premo mids you have? Sure ideally we'd all like less DEF rookies on field but it's not like the other positions have great rookie options jumping out to be picked and there's only so much $$ to go around.

EDIT: Just had a go at turning Hore into Smith.. had to downgrade Fyfe & Conigs to M. Crouch & Steele... don't like it.

i have Libba at M5 and Moore at F4, i think Libba/B Crouch at m6 then Walsh at M7 is crazy to

rather field 3 mid rookies including Walsh then 2 or 3 defender rookies