Player X v Player Y

Started by ben_020285, December 22, 2015, 02:28:20 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TexR74


Samsturmfels


fanTCfool


hawkboy80

Hampton vs Aish, both at new clubs, leaning towards hampton but crows have a few vying for the same position
Bews vs E.Mac, both should see plenty of game time, who makes more $$ the quickest

TomK

Quote from: hawkboy80 on January 31, 2016, 04:21:35 PM
Hampton vs Aish, both at new clubs, leaning towards hampton but crows have a few vying for the same position
Bews vs E.Mac, both should see plenty of game time, who makes more $$ the quickest
Aish for now, watch Hampton in NAB though.
EMac without a doubt

Gigantor

Quote from: hawkboy80 on January 31, 2016, 04:21:35 PM
Hampton vs Aish, both at new clubs, leaning towards hampton but crows have a few vying for the same position
Bews vs E.Mac, both should see plenty of game time, who makes more $$ the quickest

Aish for me, just, as I don't think either are locked in the best 22

Emac by a mile, proven 70+ scorer, has the potential to be a poor man's Rance and push toward an 80 ave

Gigantor

Smith vs Hurn

Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)

TexR74

Quote from: Gigantor on January 31, 2016, 04:33:19 PM
Smith vs Hurn

Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
I would go smith, thats only a personal preference though

TexR74


fanTCfool

Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:28:12 PM
Francis vs Weitiering?

Francis, easily, should see plenty more game-time than Weitering

jfitty

Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:24:40 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 31, 2016, 04:33:19 PM
Smith vs Hurn

Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
I would go smith, thats only a personal preference though

Smith for me too.

I can't see where Hurn's improvement would come from after a 75 average last year. At least there was a reason why Smith struggled

MC

Quote from: jfitty on January 31, 2016, 05:45:51 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:24:40 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 31, 2016, 04:33:19 PM
Smith vs Hurn

Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
I would go smith, thats only a personal preference though

Smith for me too.

I can't see where Hurn's improvement would come from after a 75 average last year. At least there was a reason why Smith struggled

Given the decimation of the Eagles' defense, Hurn had a pretty good reason imo.

TexR74

Balic vs Silvagni or any other 117k forward rookie aside from Brown or tipungwati

jfitty

Quote from: MC on January 31, 2016, 05:50:20 PM
Quote from: jfitty on January 31, 2016, 05:45:51 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:24:40 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 31, 2016, 04:33:19 PM
Smith vs Hurn

Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
I would go smith, thats only a personal preference though

Smith for me too.

I can't see where Hurn's improvement would come from after a 75 average last year. At least there was a reason why Smith struggled

Given the decimation of the Eagles' defense, Hurn had a pretty good reason imo.

Hmm that's true, I'd still prefer Smith

fanTCfool

Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:52:48 PM
Balic vs Silvagni or any other 117k forward rookie aside from Brown or tipungwati

Unimportant and irrelevant at the moment