So who is there? Who has the best JS? Scoring potential?
Clurey - May get named but due to injuries
KK - Been injured
Cameron - looks likely for r1 haven't seen him in many teams?
Fuller - Was popular early - apparently B.Murphy is ahead of schedule in recovery
Langdon - looks likely but a lot of fringe Pies about (Fasolo,Dwyer,Thomas etc.)
Langford - looks likely but lots of outs at Hawks how long will he keep his spot?
McDonald - people even going cold on him but seems like he is still the best option ATM
Cutler - KPP? Won't score that well is he fighting Goose Maguire for a spot?
Georgiou - Looks great but has he been upgraded? Will he keep his spot when others return?
Brodie Martin?
Quote from: Vinny on March 12, 2014, 06:23:40 PM
Quote from: colmullet on March 12, 2014, 06:17:18 PM
Brodie Martin?
MATTTHEEEWWW JAEEEENNSSSCCCCHHH!
could be a goer.. 298k.. worth a look, could play the Henderson role?
Langford, Langdon and Brodie Martin are your best bets for the first 4ish games
Quote from: HotTiges on March 12, 2014, 06:25:44 PM
Quote from: Vinny on March 12, 2014, 06:23:40 PM
Quote from: colmullet on March 12, 2014, 06:17:18 PM
Brodie Martin?
MATTTHEEEWWW JAEEEENNSSSCCCCHHH!
could be a goer.. 298k.. worth a look, could play the Henderson role?
Haha I didn't mean pick him but I hope he gets the spot over Brodie for XV reasons :P
But yeah if he plays Hendo's role, 100% worth a look. He was good in the NAB too.
Got me thinking SLIGHTLY haha
Quote from: colmullet on March 12, 2014, 06:17:18 PM
Brodie Martin?
How did he go from getting 2 games last year to best 22? Is it just due to injuries?
Got a good fantasy score last practice game v GWS. Anyone know wat posi he played.
Quote from: tigertops on March 12, 2014, 07:09:52 PM
Got a good fantasy score last practice game v GWS. Anyone know wat posi he played.
In the forward line. Kicked 3 goals from memory
Is he in their best 22? Or just filling a void left by injuries.
So was Georgiou meant to have been upgraded by today?
Quote from: timtim on March 12, 2014, 07:21:40 PM
So was Georgiou meant to have been upgraded by today?
? I've been trying to find this out but to no avail. My last defensive spot will likely go to Georgiou or Langford at this stage...both play in week 2 so no urgency but would like to know regardless.
At this stage I think Langdon, Clurey, Langford and Georgiou are the best bets for 12k and below
Cant see Cutler getting games, but Clay Cameron from GCS a chance to play games so keep an eye out on him
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 12, 2014, 07:47:14 PM
At this stage I think Langdon, Clurey, Langford and Georgiou are the best bets for 12k and below
Cant see Cutler getting games, but Clay Cameron from GCS a chance to play games so keep an eye out on him
Be nice if Georgiou was upgraded!
Are people going to scrap Webster if 3 or 4 rookies are named?
That extra cash sure would b handy
Quote from: Dayze on March 12, 2014, 07:52:36 PM
Are people going to scrap Webster if 3 or 4 rookies are named?
That extra cash sure would b handy
Depends on how secure those 4 rookies spots are. If 1 or 2 plays a couple of games then see-ya later what then? There's no one to downgrade to cos u probably have all the available rookies already?
Conversely if Webster goes down or is an epic fail then u can downgrade to a rookie u may have missed.
Quote from: Dayze on March 12, 2014, 07:52:36 PM
Are people going to scrap Webster if 3 or 4 rookies are named?
That extra cash sure would b handy
No. He's locked.
Quote from: tigertops on March 12, 2014, 07:09:52 PM
Got a good fantasy score last practice game v GWS. Anyone know wat posi he played.
Sorry was asking about jaensch.
Any ideas wat posi he played. I think he had some mid time?
Why is there all of a sudden so much love for Webster?
Is everyone getting carried away because of his NAB scores? Against the Doggies and GWS?
I'm not saying his a bad pick, I'm just wondering why all of a sudden his such a good pick?
I'm thinking of now running Suckling and McDonald at D4/5 because I reckon there will be 3 rookies quite easily who play early games
Langford, Langdon, Clurey and Georgiou/Cameron are all high chances to get games IMO. 4 of them plus McDonald, just need at least 2 of them to play each week.
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 12, 2014, 10:31:33 PM
Why is there all of a sudden so much love for Webster?
Is everyone getting carried away because of his NAB scores? Against the Doggies and GWS?
I'm not saying his a bad pick, I'm just wondering why all of a sudden his such a good pick?
I'm thinking of now running Suckling and McDonald at D4/5 because I reckon there will be 3 rookies quite easily who play early games
Langford, Langdon, Clurey and Georgiou/Cameron are all high chances to get games IMO. 4 of them plus McDonald, just need at least 2 of them to play each week.
Mate a lot of us would like to do that. I still think there is too much uncertainty with back rookies. Like I said earlier what if say Georgiou and Clurey play a few games then nothing for ages? It's happened before. Then u've got McDonald at D5 who has never played AFL and could get vested or even rested/rotated
That's part of the appeal of Webster with extra JS. Plus I only found out how cheap he was just recently!
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 12, 2014, 10:31:33 PM
Langford, Langdon, Clurey and Georgiou/Cameron are all high chances to get games IMO. 4 of them plus McDonald, just need at least 2 of them to play each week.
I know Hinkley mentioned Clurey to some extent but would he get games in front of Trengove, Carlile, Jonas and Hombsch. And if so how many. Has Georgio been upgraded yet and does he play when Garland comes back in. Just playing devils advocate as i would also like to pick them but their JS is shaky imo.
Yeah fair points boys. Getting named rd1 is one thing, but stringing games together is another
Maybe Suckers, Webster, McDonald at F4-6 with two rookies on the bench is the safest and most sensible option
Wish Webster wasn't all the rage though. I mentioned to you weeks ago RD that there was a certain St Kilda player i had my eye on which you guessed ;)
Quote from: auscoyote on March 12, 2014, 11:13:42 PM
Wish Webster wasn't all the rage though. I mentioned to you weeks ago RD that there was a certain St Kilda player i had my eye on which you guessed ;)
Ahh so I was right with that guess?
Now I am playing around with putting Webster in my team, geeez everything a mess, too much tweaking!
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 12, 2014, 11:35:58 PM
Quote from: auscoyote on March 12, 2014, 11:13:42 PM
Wish Webster wasn't all the rage though. I mentioned to you weeks ago RD that there was a certain St Kilda player i had my eye on which you guessed ;)
Ahh so I was right with that guess?
Now I am playing around with putting Webster in my team, geeez everything a mess, too much tweaking!
Yep, i think he shall fill the hole Dal Santo left nicely.
Quote from: Dayze on March 12, 2014, 07:52:36 PM
Are people going to scrap Webster if 3 or 4 rookies are named?
That extra cash sure would b handy
Yep already have. 3 cheap rookies from D6-D8
IMO
Webster is not a bad option - I downgraded to him last year - I watched his 2nd game , scored around 85 I think, but showed he has a bit of "class" - didn't turn out to be the best downgrade but I still rate him.
I also think Suckling could struggle to get back to his best - most players coming back from knees take a little while.
So if you need the cash and have Suckling at D5 or D6, I think Suckling to Webster is a good downgrade for what I think will be similar points output and better cash generation
GC SUNS @GoldCoastSUNS 17s
Queenslander Clay Cameron will make his AFL debut this Saturday night against Richmond: http://bit.ly/1fUN
Is anyone else getting overwhelmed by all the rookies that are looking like play round 1 :o
Mcdonald, Martin, Langford, Langdon, Cameron, Clurey and Georgiou all look like lining up for round 1! Not saying many have JS but picking 3-4 of these guys could prove difficult!
Who would have thought that 2 months ago i'd say that!
Easy to get sucked in. I only have room for two and some blokes won't get games. Cameron and Langford look the best for JS I would say but I don't mind downgrading Webster on the verge of Round 3 if someone else pops his head up
Clurey and Lanford seem better value than Webster plus the saints have lots of injuries and suspensions to key players which could affect there players scoring , can always jump on board round 3 if he is flying
Quote from: felsty on March 13, 2014, 03:55:53 PM
Easy to get sucked in. I only have room for two and some blokes won't get games. Cameron and Langford look the best for JS I would say but I don't mind downgrading Webster on the verge of Round 3 if someone else pops his head up
Don't like Cameron's JS at all really, he plays because Thompson and Tape are out injured, Thompson a good chance to play round 2, don't think Tape is too far away either
I would have thought it would be more of a rearrange of the talls once Thompson is back. I agree with Tape though. Cameron is playing that 3rd tall who is flexible enough to play small type role isn't he?
I'll go with Cameron on the bench
Clurey is not in Ports best 22 IMO - at least Cameron has a chance to cement a spot if he plays well
Georgiou and Langford the other two I hope to get
Quote from: Ricochet on March 12, 2014, 11:59:52 PM
Quote from: Dayze on March 12, 2014, 07:52:36 PM
Are people going to scrap Webster if 3 or 4 rookies are named?
That extra cash sure would b handy
Yep already have. 3 cheap rookies from D6-D8
Are you going with Suckling D4 and McDonald D5 Rico? Or a rookie in lieu of either one of them?
clay cameron CHB looks entising, the main problem is who to field? Langford, Cameron, Clurey
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 13, 2014, 07:13:30 PM
clay cameron CHB looks entising, the main problem is who to field? Langford, Cameron, Clurey
cameron last a week when thompson comes back ?
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 13, 2014, 07:11:15 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 12, 2014, 11:59:52 PM
Quote from: Dayze on March 12, 2014, 07:52:36 PM
Are people going to scrap Webster if 3 or 4 rookies are named?
That extra cash sure would b handy
Yep already have. 3 cheap rookies from D6-D8
Are you going with Suckling D4 and McDonald D5 Rico? Or a rookie in lieu of either one of them?
Suckers at D5 man
Quote from: eaglesman on March 13, 2014, 07:19:19 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 13, 2014, 07:13:30 PM
clay cameron CHB looks entising, the main problem is who to field? Langford, Cameron, Clurey
cameron last a week when thompson comes back ?
Yeah this is important. I hear he can play tall and small so that would help.
Any GC supporters out there?
I've just locked in Mcdonald, Martin, Langford and Clurey for D5-8 and Langdon as M10.
Quote from: ubeaut on March 13, 2014, 07:23:31 PM
Quote from: eaglesman on March 13, 2014, 07:19:19 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 13, 2014, 07:13:30 PM
clay cameron CHB looks entising, the main problem is who to field? Langford, Cameron, Clurey
cameron last a week when thompson comes back ?
Yeah this is important. I hear he can play tall and small so that would help.
Any GC supporters out there?
with may, warnock thompson mate they aint gonna play him ahead of mckenzie shaw harbrow stanley KK when he comes in next week
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 13, 2014, 07:24:16 PM
I've just locked in Mcdonald, Martin, Langford and Clurey for D5-8 and Langdon as M10.
How are u so sure Martin will even get named? He doesn't seem to be rated on Adelaide boards?
Quote from: eaglesman on March 13, 2014, 07:26:21 PM
Quote from: ubeaut on March 13, 2014, 07:23:31 PM
Quote from: eaglesman on March 13, 2014, 07:19:19 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 13, 2014, 07:13:30 PM
clay cameron CHB looks entising, the main problem is who to field? Langford, Cameron, Clurey
cameron last a week when thompson comes back ?
Yeah this is important. I hear he can play tall and small so that would help.
Any GC supporters out there?
with may, warnock thompson mate they aint gonna play him ahead of mckenzie shaw harbrow stanley KK when he comes in next week
I live on the GC does that count?
agree with eaglesman- Cameron's JS is pretty shaky when a couple of those names return to their side.
Quote from: ubeaut on March 13, 2014, 07:28:23 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 13, 2014, 07:24:16 PM
I've just locked in Mcdonald, Martin, Langford and Clurey for D5-8 and Langdon as M10.
How are u so sure Martin will even get named? He doesn't seem to be rated on Adelaide boards?
I'd love to this but u would have to play Clurey on field this week just in case Martin isnt named wouldnt u?
Quote from: colmullet on March 13, 2014, 07:29:35 PM
Quote from: ubeaut on March 13, 2014, 07:28:23 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 13, 2014, 07:24:16 PM
I've just locked in Mcdonald, Martin, Langford and Clurey for D5-8 and Langdon as M10.
How are u so sure Martin will even get named? He doesn't seem to be rated on Adelaide boards?
I'd love to this but u would have to play Clurey on field this week just in case Martin isnt named wouldnt u?
Nah, just chuck the E on Clurey...
Just another thought about Langdon as M10 DPP.
Mids....GAJ/ Pendles/ Beams ...R8 bye
DPP Langdon>Mitchell or McVeigh...no mid doughnut
What other R8 defenders do you have? Just McD for me...no def doughnut.
All of this is crystal ball stuff of course...Langdon may be dropped quicker than a hot potato but it could work out okay.
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 13, 2014, 07:24:16 PM
I've just locked in Mcdonald, Martin, Langford and Clurey for D5-8 and Langdon as M10.
Done the same except Laidler over Clurey. As much as I wanted to go 123k or less on my bench having Martin or Laidler there makes me more Confident. Cause not confident on many back rookies even if they get named.
Help me out here guys
Cameron, Clurey and Langdon have all been named. Next week Langford and Georgiou are who I have my eye on, as well as needing a cheap M10, which at this stage Crouch seems to be the only likely option
I am fielding a rookie at D6, so I am thinking that because the 3 have already been named, I put Clurey and Cameron as my def bench, and pick Langdon as my M10. Crouch is likely to play rd1, but I really cant see him staying in long once senior Crows start returning, and Langdons DPP allows me to swing him around during the byes if I still have him by then
I then put Langford on the ground in D6 this week, and if both he and Georgiou get named, I pick one and miss out on the other. I would love to have Georgiou over Cameron as D8, but if he and Langford don't both get named next week, it will force me to make a change elsewhere to get enough cash and bring Webster in
What do you guys think? Or do I bench Clurey and Langdon in defence, pass on Cameron, put Crouch as M10 and then still decide on Langford or Georgiou next week.
If Langdon isn't the sub field him. Have Langford at D7 and Clurey/Cameron at D8.
Not sure. I am still nowhere near convinced on either Cameron OR especially Clureys JS. Carlisle would take his spot surely?
Cameron has Thompson,Tape maybe KK comes in..
Quote from: ubeaut on March 13, 2014, 11:31:00 PM
Not sure. I am still nowhere near convinced on either Cameron OR especially Clureys JS. Carlisle would take his spot surely?
Cameron has Thompson,Tape maybe KK comes in..
Wouldn't worry about Tape
Thompson hasn't played a game all preseason so he would have to be a while away
Cameron's JS is better than Clurey's I reckon. When is Carlisle due back? I reckon he would replace Hombsch and Clurey might be able to stay in as long as plays well
Quote from: Ricochet on March 13, 2014, 11:28:55 PM
If Langdon isn't the sub field him. Have Langford at D7 and Clurey/Cameron at D8.
I'm going with Langdon at M10, so not going to field him over any of the mid rookies
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 13, 2014, 11:42:55 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 13, 2014, 11:28:55 PM
If Langdon isn't the sub field him. Have Langford at D7 and Clurey/Cameron at D8.
I'm going with Langdon at M10, so not going to field him over any of the mid rookies
Nah I meant field him at D6. There are enough decent mid rooks
Quote from: Ricochet on March 13, 2014, 11:52:46 PM
Nah I meant field him at D6. There are enough decent mid rooks
Langford at D6. Cameron and Clurey 7/8
Who are your mid rooks?
Langdon in the mids seems like a waste
5 premo's, Michie, Polec, Ellis and Dunstan at M9
Passing on Tyson, as the money is used elsewhere. I really cant see anyone else other than Langdon or Crouch being options for me at M10, and I reckon Langdon has better JS
Langford/Georgiou as D6 next week, and locking Cameron and Clurey as D7/8 as they have been named. I can get rid of one of them and move Langdon to replace them, but then that means I have to go with Crouch at M10, no other options, and I don't want to have to rely on Crouch being named next week
During the rd8 bye I could also swing Langdon with McVeigh, play McVeigh on midfield, and move Langdon to def bench that week. Not a deciding factor, but handy bonus
what are you using the extra money from not having Tyson on? He is definitely worth the extra coin. You're paying for his JS and Saints have a nice opening draw
Ive moved Langdon to D7 and Crouch will be my M10
I am going weak in the rucks, and weak down back, so I am going strong in the mids and forwards
i have had another look, still not confident on back rooks.
Now have Suckling @5, Webster @6 and Macd 7, Hoping geogiou 8 (though I may go Langdon)
It has hurt my fwd line, but I think there are a few undervalued fwds that I can risk on.
Biggest question for me, do I keep Langford and Georgiou in my side this week, and just hope they get named next week? Think they are better options than Clurey and Cameron, or do I pick one of ClureyCameton in case one of those guys arent named?
Playing Langdon and McDonald as my other defense rookies.
Quote from: dmac07 on March 14, 2014, 01:21:00 AM
Biggest question for me, do I keep Langford and Georgiou in my side this week, and just hope they get named next week? Think they are better options than Clurey and Cameron, or do I pick one of ClureyCameton in case one of those guys arent named?
Playing Langdon and McDonald as my other defense rookies.
In the same position as you. Have Langford at D6 and Langdon at D7. I would love to put Georgiou at D8 now but if both Georgiou and Langford don't play next week, I think were flowered, because Laidler, Cameron and Clurey wont be available to pick, so for that reason I have put Clurey at M10
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 14, 2014, 01:24:21 AM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 14, 2014, 01:21:00 AM
Biggest question for me, do I keep Langford and Georgiou in my side this week, and just hope they get named next week? Think they are better options than Clurey and Cameron, or do I pick one of ClureyCameton in case one of those guys arent named?
Playing Langdon and McDonald as my other defense rookies.
In the same position as you. Have Langford at D6 and Langdon at D7. I would love to put Georgiou at D8 now but if both Georgiou and Langford don't play next week, I think were flowered, because Laidler, Cameron and Clurey wont be available to pick, so for that reason I have put Clurey at M10
Have kept Langford m6 and Georgiou m10... lets see if I can keep my balls and risk it.. as I think it will pay off it works. Worst case, downgrade caddy and get in webater
Quote from: dmac07 on March 14, 2014, 01:34:46 AM
Have kept Langford m6 and Georgiou m10... lets see if I can keep my balls and risk it.. as I think it will pay off it works. Worst case, downgrade caddy and get in webater
Hmmm, so you reckon we take the risk and go with Langford D6, Langdon D7 and Georgiou D8, and if one of them doesn't get named we downgrade Caddy to say Higgins, and then upgrade Langford to Webster
What happens if both Langford and Georgiou both don't get named?
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 14, 2014, 01:46:24 AM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 14, 2014, 01:34:46 AM
Have kept Langford m6 and Georgiou m10... lets see if I can keep my balls and risk it.. as I think it will pay off it works. Worst case, downgrade caddy and get in webater
Hmmm, so you reckon we take the risk and go with Langford D6, Langdon D7 and Georgiou D8, and if one of them doesn't get named we downgrade Caddy to say Higgins, and then upgrade Langford to Webster
What happens if both Langford and Georgiou both don't get named?
Head.. brick wall... hit repeatedly
I can just see both those guys pushing 70s averages whilst clurey/cameron I see more as 50s averages, thats 20 a week if your fieldijg one.. plus 100-150k in extra cash, which is why im so tempted to risk it.
Very tempted to risk it too
Would have to be extremely stiff for both not to get named. Even if one doesn't get named then so be it, loophole donut is worst case scenario
I reckon I will risk it too, because I agree, don't see Clurey and Cameron being worthy options
not starting any rookies in defense don't like there JS
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 14, 2014, 04:53:19 AM
not starting any rookies in defense don't like there JS
Same i have webster at D6 if i had go play a rookie it would be McDonald or Landford
Quote from: dmac07 on March 14, 2014, 01:51:34 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 14, 2014, 01:46:24 AM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 14, 2014, 01:34:46 AM
Have kept Langford m6 and Georgiou m10... lets see if I can keep my balls and risk it.. as I think it will pay off it works. Worst case, downgrade caddy and get in webater
Hmmm, so you reckon we take the risk and go with Langford D6, Langdon D7 and Georgiou D8, and if one of them doesn't get named we downgrade Caddy to say Higgins, and then upgrade Langford to Webster
What happens if both Langford and Georgiou both don't get named?
Head.. brick wall... hit repeatedly
I can just see both those guys pushing 70s averages whilst clurey/cameron I see more as 50s averages, thats 20 a week if your fieldijg one.. plus 100-150k in extra cash, which is why im so tempted to risk it.
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 14, 2014, 01:54:15 AM
Very tempted to risk it too
Would have to be extremely stiff for both not to get named. Even if one doesn't get named then so be it, loophole donut is worst case scenario
I reckon I will risk it too, because I agree, don't see Clurey and Cameron being worthy options
Same position :P
I'm going to take advantage of the rolling lockout to see if these guys actually play the positions they are named in first. Plenty of teams put out a list and then you find people who were named on field actually turn up with a green vest on...
Georgiou is the only on who is covering an LTI so even though I see Langford as having the best scoring potential I reckon his JS is just as shaky as the others. Cameron doesn't tempt me, Langdon's bye doesn't help me, Clurey is the only of those three I would consider replacing Langford with. But I think Langford will be soooo much better if he can keep a spot... Big "if" though. If Clurey starts the game then I'll have a decision to make. Until then, fortune favours the bold.
I think I am going to drop Langford and Georgiou and bring in Langdon and Clurey for D7/D8, not willing to risk it waiting for next week.
I think you need to pick up Langdon or Clurey this week if you have both Langford and Georgiou. Too much risk to hope 2 rookies get spots... what do you do if not?
I'm taking Langdon, and keeping Georgiou. I don't like Clureys scoring potention. At this stage I'm crossing my fingers at least one gets called up next week or I'm flowered though.
Quote from: Alka on March 14, 2014, 10:41:22 AM
I think you need to pick up Langdon or Clurey this week if you have both Langford and Georgiou. Too much risk to hope 2 rookies get spots... what do you do if not?
I'm taking Langdon, and keeping Georgiou. I don't like Clureys scoring potention. At this stage I'm crossing my fingers at least one gets called up next week or I'm flowered though.
Ive already got Langdon, McDonald locked in too. Its whether I pick up clurey now who has low scoring potential so I only need oneeofLangford and Georgiou to be named.
I just can't risk any rookie on field besides McDonald.
Cameron - JS? Scoring?
Clurey - JS? (Carlisle) Scoring?
Langdon - JS? Seedsman,Thomas
Langford - JS? Stratton,Lake,Sewell,Rioli, etc all would come back who misses out?
Georgiou - JS? Hasn't even been upgraded
Can anyone convince me on JS for ANY of these guys?
Reckon Langdon and Langford are pretty safe mate
Shaw, Seedsman, Williams, Thomas coming out of the backline for the Pies and only Toovey (off the top of my head) to come back in.
Guerra, Savage, Buddy, Sewell, Stratton, Lake, Rioli all out of Hawks best 22. Langford will be fine.
Quote from: Ricochet on March 14, 2014, 11:14:26 AM
Reckon Langdon and Langford are pretty safe mate
Shaw, Seedsman, Williams, Thomas coming out of the backline for the Pies and only Toovey (off the top of my head) to come back in.
Guerra, Savage, Buddy, Sewell, Stratton, Lake, Rioli all out of Hawks best 22. Langford will be fine.
Cheers mate. But Lake Rioli Sewell and Stratton have to come back,no? Only Guerra Buddy savage are gone. Who misses out when they return?
Only need about 5 or so games to make a bit of money.
Ideally you don't need them on field which I think is the key.
Quote from: ubeaut on March 14, 2014, 11:16:41 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 14, 2014, 11:14:26 AM
Reckon Langdon and Langford are pretty safe mate
Shaw, Seedsman, Williams, Thomas coming out of the backline for the Pies and only Toovey (off the top of my head) to come back in.
Guerra, Savage, Buddy, Sewell, Stratton, Lake, Rioli all out of Hawks best 22. Langford will be fine.
Cheers mate. But Lake Rioli Sewell and Stratton have to come back,no? Only Guerra Buddy savage are gone. Who misses out when they return?
Yep but Lake isn't til round 4 i think and others are 2-3 weeks away. Langford will be fine
only 3.
Mcdonald, Langford and Georgiou
Hmm.
Traded Daisy to Langdon in the mids and bench him > Put Ellis on the field.
Then upgraded Webstar to Enright. Georgio,Clurey bench.
DEF looks real strong now but don't know if i want to field 4 rookies in the engine room, looks real weak.
Quote from: ubeaut on March 14, 2014, 11:08:28 AM
I just can't risk any rookie on field besides McDonald.
Cameron - JS? Scoring?
Clurey - JS? (Carlisle) Scoring?
Langdon - JS? Seedsman,Thomas
Langford - JS? Stratton,Lake,Sewell,Rioli, etc all would come back who misses out?
Georgiou - JS? Hasn't even been upgraded
Can anyone convince me on JS for ANY of these guys?
Agree
McDonald is locked at D6 for me now, with Langford and Langdon on bench. Next week if both Langford and Georgiou are named I will just take one of them and miss the other
4 rookie mids puts you a long way behind IMO. Most people have Daisy @m5 at worst, some have Beams
Laidler
Quote from: reesbr on March 14, 2014, 12:29:41 PM
Laidler
I am off him. Poor JS, unless he comes out tomorrow and tears it up. With the Swans players to come back in, he will be one of the first to go.
Quote from: SydneyRox on March 14, 2014, 12:21:06 PM
4 rookie mids puts you a long way behind IMO. Most people have Daisy @m5 at worst, some have Beams
Behind what? people with 5 mids are weaker elsewhere and the points are made up
Either way, lets be serious - the chances of actually winning overall are going to be something like 1 in 300+k
I am happy to finish with a good overall ranking and win my leagues
Quote from: SydneyRox on March 14, 2014, 12:21:06 PM
4 rookie mids puts you a long way behind IMO. Most people have Daisy @m5 at worst, some have Beams
Exactly :)
Got Beams M4 and when Daisy does his ankle second round i shall celebrate by adding chocolate to milk!
In saying that, i just brought him back in. 8)
Quote from: SydneyRox on March 14, 2014, 12:21:06 PM
4 rookie mids puts you a long way behind IMO. Most people have Daisy @m5 at worst, some have Beams
Really? At least 50% of the people ive spoken to have a 4 prem 4 rookie set up in the mids
Clurey verdict? Any Port fan's about haha. Of course Carlisle to come back, is Clurey straight out?
Quote from: shorty3264 on March 14, 2014, 03:17:19 PM
Clurey verdict? Any Port fan's about haha. Of course Carlisle to come back, is Clurey straight out?
He'll be fighting for a spot with Hombsch IMO. Couldn't tell you who is preferred though :-\
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 14, 2014, 03:29:17 PM
Quote from: shorty3264 on March 14, 2014, 03:17:19 PM
Clurey verdict? Any Port fan's about haha. Of course Carlisle to come back, is Clurey straight out?
He'll be fighting for a spot with Hombsch IMO. Couldn't tell you who is preferred though :-\
Thanks mate. For me it's Langford vs Clurey. Tough one long term..
Quote from: shorty3264 on March 14, 2014, 03:31:12 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 14, 2014, 03:29:17 PM
Quote from: shorty3264 on March 14, 2014, 03:17:19 PM
Clurey verdict? Any Port fan's about haha. Of course Carlisle to come back, is Clurey straight out?
He'll be fighting for a spot with Hombsch IMO. Couldn't tell you who is preferred though :-\
Thanks mate. For me it's Langford vs Clurey. Tough one long term..
Yeah this is the last area of my team I'm trying to finalise - the back rookies.
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 14, 2014, 03:32:04 PM
Quote from: shorty3264 on March 14, 2014, 03:31:12 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 14, 2014, 03:29:17 PM
Quote from: shorty3264 on March 14, 2014, 03:17:19 PM
Clurey verdict? Any Port fan's about haha. Of course Carlisle to come back, is Clurey straight out?
He'll be fighting for a spot with Hombsch IMO. Couldn't tell you who is preferred though :-\
Thanks mate. For me it's Langford vs Clurey. Tough one long term..
Yeah this is the last area of my team I'm trying to finalise - the back rookies.
Yeh haha.. not alone there.. :o