Ok guys and girls...i've decided to start up a thread where i will post my team and keep updating it over the year
Hope it is a good read and you'll be ready to give me advice when needed over the year
Thanks :)
So my team is (with $26,700):
Def: goddard, h.shaw, birchall, grimes, lake, m.clarke, mohr <ellis sierakowski>
Mid: ablett, murphy, priddis, jelwood, horsley, shiel <treloar brown>
Ruc: sandi, leuenberger <giles stephenson>
Fwd: franklin, rioli, zaharakis, brown, porplyzia, zorko, smedts <pfieffer walsh>
Ive tried to make my team capable of coping with the byes and fairly balanced...and obviously the rookies will change based on NAB
Anyone suggest any changes???
Am i talking to myself here??? Anyone have any suggestions? I think my forward line is a prem. short...
Mids are pretty strong - but could you better use the cash to beef up your forward line? Better rookies available in the midfield, who are capable of higher scores.
Quote from: MC on February 17, 2012, 09:59:08 PM
Mids are pretty strong - but could you better use the cash to beef up your forward line? Better rookies available in the midfield, who are capable of higher scores.
yeah totally agree with you! :) have no idea what prem. mid to leave out though (priddis is a lock as a unique-ish premium) and zaha could average 105+ this year making him a premium and i wouldnt be losing much by having say steveJ instead?
It's not the difference between the premiums that is the issue - It's the difference between the rookies. Mid rookies can look to get 80+ whereas fwd rookies might get 60ish.
I'd suggest Murphy/Selwood down to Barlow (for example) gives you 220k (inc cash) to upgrade Porp to a 450k fwd such as Sidebottom/Dangerfield etc.
Murphy-->barlow...porps-->danger???
Which structure are you comfortable with 4 prems/ 2 rooks or 3 mids 3 prems
If 4 prem would downgrade one to Barlow as has been said but If 3/3 look at Downgrading to Caddy or Stevens who look ready made to increase in value rapidly.
Not convinced that Zaha can rise to F3 but personal.
Not commenting on rooks as will change as a result of NAB cup.
Just a couple of suggestions and 8.5/10 for this team
Quote from: Jayman on February 16, 2012, 08:23:53 PM
So my team is (with $26,700):
Def: goddard, h.shaw, birchall, grimes, lake, m.clarke, mohr <ellis sierakowski>
Mid: ablett, murphy, priddis, jelwood, horsley, shiel <treloar brown>
Ruc: sandi, leuenberger <giles stephenson>
Fwd: franklin, rioli, zaharakis, brown, porplyzia, zorko, smedts <pfieffer walsh>
Ive tried to make my team capable of coping with the byes and fairly balanced...and obviously the rookies will change based on NAB
Def: a lot of depth love birchall and think every def needs a hawk in it with thier high possession style.
Mid: solid faultless
Ruck: solid faultless
Fwd: nice pick is rioli hammys are risky but he claims to have fixed his running, a fair bit of depth with porps but like my fwd line zaka, brown and porps bit of risk but strong enough/
solid well structured side, cannot fault it except to say be very watchful of grimes,lake,rioli,zaka,porps, all have had significant injury concerns or past seasons(zaka not so much but he does claim to suffer a LOT of pain in the legs after games) im on him anyway. :)
also horsley and pfieffer need to be promoted off rookie lists i love both, and zorko is injured watch him closely to see if he will be good for round 1.
Quote from: Ringo on February 18, 2012, 01:27:28 PM
Which structure are you comfortable with 4 prems/ 2 rooks or 3 mids 3 prems
If 4 prem would downgrade one to Barlow as has been said but If 3/3 look at Downgrading to Caddy or Stevens who look ready made to increase in value rapidly.
Not convinced that Zaha can rise to F3 but personal.
Not commenting on rooks as will change as a result of NAB cup.
Just a couple of suggestions and 8.5/10 for this team
well i initially had the 3-1-2 structure in mids but heard barlow wasnt exactly training the house down! So at the cost of my other lines (mainly forwards, as you can see by zaha as f3) i went with the 4-0-2 structure...i could go 3-0-3 structure then upgrade forwards!?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 18, 2012, 01:32:46 PM
Quote from: Jayman on February 16, 2012, 08:23:53 PM
So my team is (with $26,700):
Def: goddard, h.shaw, birchall, grimes, lake, m.clarke, mohr <ellis sierakowski>
Mid: ablett, murphy, priddis, jelwood, horsley, shiel <treloar brown>
Ruc: sandi, leuenberger <giles stephenson>
Fwd: franklin, rioli, zaharakis, brown, porplyzia, zorko, smedts <pfieffer walsh>
Ive tried to make my team capable of coping with the byes and fairly balanced...and obviously the rookies will change based on NAB
Def: a lot of depth love birchall and think every def needs a hawk in it with thier high possession style.
Mid: solid faultless
Ruck: solid faultless
Fwd: nice pick is rioli hammys are risky but he claims to have fixed his running, a fair bit of depth with porps but like my fwd line zaka, brown and porps bit of risk but strong enough/
solid well structured side, cannot fault it except to say be very watchful of grimes,lake,rioli,zaka,porps, all have had significant injury concerns or past seasons(zaka not so much but he does claim to suffer a LOT of pain in the legs after games) im on him anyway. :)
also horsley and pfieffer need to be promoted off rookie lists i love both, and zorko is injured watch him closely to see if he will be good for round 1.
Thanks :) yeah i like birchall and rioli is a calculated risk, a lock for me! Yeah there are a few blokes with injury concerns in my side...will be monitoring them very closely! Yeah horsley and pfieffer should be promoted I think. Zorko wont be in my team if he doesnt line up round 1 :)
So my team is (with $26,700):
Def: goddard, h.shaw, birchall, grimes, lake, m.clarke, mohr <ellis sierakowski>
Mid: ablett, murphy, priddis, jelwood, horsley, shiel <treloar brown>
Ruc: sandi, leuenberger <giles stephenson>
Fwd: franklin, rioli, zaharakis, brown, porplyzia, zorko, smedts <pfieffer walsh>
Likes: Birchall pick very solid if not spectacular player, grimes a risk worth taking but I wouldnt take both Grimes and Lake pick one and downgrade them to a rookie.
Mids: Great premiums with Priddis as a unique (prob not so much this year but still)
Rucks if Sandis turf toe stands up great.
For: WOuldnt have both Franklin and Rioli pick one same as with Porps and Brown (although im struggling with the same decision)
With the money from downgrading Lake maybe upgrade Porps or Brown or Zak.
GOod luck!
Quote from: Madmax75 on February 18, 2012, 04:50:12 PM
Likes: Birchall pick very solid if not spectacular player, grimes a risk worth taking but I wouldnt take both Grimes and Lake pick one and downgrade them to a rookie.
Mids: Great premiums with Priddis as a unique (prob not so much this year but still)
Rucks if Sandis turf toe stands up great.
For: WOuldnt have both Franklin and Rioli pick one same as with Porps and Brown (although im struggling with the same decision)
With the money from downgrading Lake maybe upgrade Porps or Brown or Zak.
GOod luck!
thanks mate...definitely some moves to consider! :)
Ok so ive made some changes :D
Got 7.3k in the bank
Backs: goddard shaw birchall adcock grimes clarke bugg <darley morris>
Mids: pendlebury ablett selwood clifton horsley mcdonald <pfieffer brown>
Rucks: mumford leuenberger <stepehenson giles>
Fwds: franklin rioli martin sidebottom brown hampton smedts <walsh skinner>
Thoughts?
In relation to the above post ^^^^
Effecively the changes i've made are:
Adock in for Lake
Bugg, Darley and Morris in for Mohr, ellis and seirakowski
Pendlebury in for murphy
Clifton in for priddis
Mcdonald in for Shiel
Pfeiffer in for Treloar
Mumford in for Sandi
Martin in for Zaharakis
Sidebottom in for porps
Skinner and Hampton in for Zorko and Pfeiffer (still have him in mids)
Agree 2 Hawk forwards could be risky, especially with Martin sharing their bye.
Surely one of the 2 mighty Hawkers could be an upgrade target later.
Freo light huh? Don't rate them?
Also Pendlebury HAS to drop a bit doesn't he?
Maybe pick up one of Broughton / Fyfe / Pav / Barlow - could all be super reliable and help you share the love come bye time.
You've got my rucks!
Quote from: tor01doc on February 22, 2012, 11:05:35 AM
Agree 2 Hawk forwards could be risky, especially with Martin sharing their bye.
Surely one of the 2 mighty Hawkers could be an upgrade target later.
Freo light huh? Don't rate them?
Also Pendlebury HAS to drop a bit doesn't he?
Maybe pick up one of Broughton / Fyfe / Pav / Barlow - could all be super reliable and help you share the love come bye time.
You've got my rucks!
ok cyril can go i guess!
Broughton-too inconsistent and too many ? ? ? Around his position.
Fyfe- maybe in for cyril
pav- too old
Barlow- leg a worry!
And i still think pendles will average 130 and is fairly unique :D
Ok...so ive done a bit of reading up on team structure going into the.rnd11 bye! Using the structure i found, my team now looks like this:
Backs: goddard shaw birchall adcock grimes clarke bugg <morris wilkes>
Mids: gablett selwood thomas caddy horsley neale <brown hampton>
Rucks: mcevoy l-berger <giles stephenson>
Fwds: buddy fyfe martin sidebottom brown smedts skinner <pfeiffer walsh>
Quote from: Jayman on February 23, 2012, 08:52:33 AM
Ok...so ive done a bit of reading up on team structure going into the.rnd11 bye! Using the structure i found, my team now looks like this:
Backs: goddard shaw birchall adcock grimes clarke bugg <morris wilkes>
Mids: gablett selwood thomas caddy horsley neale <brown hampton>
Rucks: mcevoy l-berger <giles stephenson>
Fwds: buddy fyfe martin sidebottom brown smedts skinner <pfeiffer walsh>
backs: really good hopefully adcock gets a full season same with grimes i love the birchall move i want him but not sure where i can squeeze him in
mids: interesting move with daisy could really pay off for you. caddy is touch and go for mine so is horsley on cause i havent seen to much of them
rucks: faultless
forwards: sidebottom is really due for a breakout year i think thats well documented. skinner im really not sold on dont think he capable of high scores
all round top team 8.5/10
Cheers mate! Yeah ill have a look at caddy horsley and skinner
really good 9/10
backline is amazing
midfield is great. some good rookies such as j mcdonald, s gibson are some great picks aswell
rucks are great
fwds sidebottom great pick. and brown im not so sure about but great all round
Quote from: DanTh3Man on February 23, 2012, 09:12:02 PM
really good 9/10
backline is amazing
midfield is great. some good rookies such as j mcdonald, s gibson are some great picks aswell
rucks are great
fwds sidebottom great pick. and brown im not so sure about but great all round
cheers
Just brought in couch and weedon IN FOR skinner and walsh...wont post my whole team again as was only a couple of rookie changes :)
Im having trouble with getting my bye structure right...im not sure whether i should not worry so much about my bye structure, which is perfect at the moment BUT ive had to compromise my ideal team to do so...e.g i dont want beau wilkes but there isnt any other options with the same bye!
My bye structure at the moment is:
Backs: 2/3/4 or 2/4/3
Mids: 2/3/3
Rucks: 2/1/1
Fwds: 2/3/4 or 2/4/3
Im thinking about just going with my ideal team and worrying about the byes as they come, not sure if that would be too smart tho
NEED HELP :)
As you know from posts byes doing head in.
I am having to have that structure by round 10 as it is the structure that will allow you only 2 donuts. The big problem is getting from where i am now to that structure with trades. It will be rookies taht I trade as I have set my prems up with no more than 2 prems from each bye round.
So you set your premiums up...and choose the best cash cows available and then trade them off for someone that fits your structure?! I think id be more comfortable with starting with the right structure then trading just to gain money and points really
Sorry forgot to mention new team
Backs: goddard shaw birchall adcock grimes clarke bugg <wilkes morris>
Mids: thomas ablett selwood caddy horsley neale<pfieffer brown>
Rucks: mcevoy leuenberger <stepehenson giles>
Fwds: franklin fyfe martin sidebottom brown hampton smedts <weedon couch>
Not quite just to illustrate (Rookies subject to change) You can see the structure I have set up basically playing 2 rooks on each line. My mid priced prems may be keepers or upgrades (Conca, Hayes, Dangerfield, Smith, Brown)
Current Team
DEF: B. Goddard, B. Deledio, H. Shaw, R. Murphy, R.Conca, S. Darleyr, S. Morris (B. Smedts, B. Wilkes)
MID: G. Ablett jnr, M. Boyd, J. Selwood, L.Hayes, S. Clifton, D. Shiel (L. Brown, D. Zorko)
RUC: Z. Smith, M. Leuenberger (J. Giles, O. Stephenson)
FWD: M. Pavlich, L. Franklin, A. Goodes, P. Dangerfield, J. Brown, ] A. Treloar, H. Crozier (S. Rowe, T. Couch)
You will see that players in bold are in my Finals Team - Trades will be made to get other players into Team eg Clifton may be upgraded to Pendles in a double trade,
This is the Team I am planning to have for finals at this point in time. Got a few extra players for contingincies.
DEF: B. Goddard, B. Deledio, H. Shaw, R. Murphy, Scotland, Heppell, Birchall/Suckling/Broughton
MID: G. Ablett jnr, M. Boyd, J. Selwood, Pendleberry, M Murphy, Rockliffe/Hayes/Priddis
RUC: Berger - To be decided after byes.
FWD: M. Pavlich, L. Franklin, A. Goodes, Fyfe, Martin, Dangerfield/Brown/Johnson/Chapman/Rioli
Pretty similar to my team in a way!
What is ur bye structure at the moment?
Current Team structure now is: 2/2/5 - 5/1/2 - 2/1/1 - 3/4/2 = 12/8/10
Not that far from 2/3/4; 2/3/3; 2/1/1; 2/4/3 to get 8/11/11 by round 10. Obviusly 3 of my mid rookies will be downgraded upgraded to help reach this and at the same time keeping final team in mind eg Clifton > Pendles, If cash required some may just be downgraded to playing rooks in byes rounds. Will be working out a detailed trading structure around round 5 as see which rookies are rising quickly and which prem if any is falling. Will be a fluid document obviously based on performances.
Ok...so you arent starting with the 'perfect' structure. Do you suggest that i do the same or go with what ive got now and be all set for byes
and the team itself, you like?
Backs Have a mixture of premiums, Mid pricers & Rookies which can be good for your team. You the unique picks of Murphy & Conca. I wouldn't Wilkes in my team though.
Mids: Fairly Strong Midfield although have dropped off Zorko since his injury. I hope for you Lenny Hayes can get back to what he was before he got injured.
Rucks Zac Smith is another player i haven't seen in many teams. He should improve this year.
Fwds I think rowe will struggle to get into the Carlton team you maybe better off with Hall of the GC.
Overall Ringo as an expert in Supercoach you have selected a strong side but only has 10 premiums at the moment
I give your team a 8/10
Quote from: johnnytheboy1 on February 27, 2012, 05:19:43 PM
Backs Have a mixture of premiums, Mid pricers & Rookies which can be good for your team. You the unique picks of Murphy & Conca. I wouldn't Wilkes in my team though.
Mids: Fairly Strong Midfield although have dropped off Zorko since his injury. I hope for you Lenny Hayes can get back to what he was before he got injured.
Rucks Zac Smith is another player i haven't seen in many teams. He should improve this year.
Fwds I think rowe will struggle to get into the Carlton team you maybe better off with Hall of the GC.
Overall Ringo as an expert in Supercoach you have selected a strong side but only has 10 premiums at the moment
I give your team a 8/10
wtf!? This isnt even ringo's thread...he was just helping me out
My team:
Backs: goddard shaw birchall adcock grimes clarke bugg <wilkes morris>
Mids: thomas ablett selwood caddy horsley neale<pfieffer brown>
Rucks: mcevoy leuenberger <stepehenson giles>
Fwds: franklin fyfe martin sidebottom brown hampton smedts <weedon couch>
How much cash do you have left.
You have a few nice uniques who may pay off for you.
Def: Slight risk with both Adcock and Grimes. If Adcock forced to a lock down role by Brisbane then his scores will suffer similar to last year but if he reverts to running of HB then Gold.
Mids: Thomas - Interesting but will he outscore Pendles or Swan or other prems. (Caddy may be gold if he fires.
Rucks: A1
Forwards: Sound
Rookies not commenting on and in my case waiting for whole of NAB cup. Not sold on getting excited on 2 20 minute halves of football. These next 2 weeks will be a better indication. This is also reason why my rookies have not changed a lot since posting.
Overall 8/10 for your team
Quote from: MC on February 17, 2012, 09:59:08 PM
Mids are pretty strong - but could you better use the cash to beef up your forward line? Better rookies available in the midfield, who are capable of higher scores.
Im with MC on this one.
Sure up your forward line.
??? Rioli, Zaha, Brown. IMO they are risks. Could pay off however dont score high often enough.
Quote from: Ringo on February 27, 2012, 10:33:54 PM
How much cash do you have left.
You have a few nice uniques who may pay off for you.
Def: Slight risk with both Adcock and Grimes. If Adcock forced to a lock down role by Brisbane then his scores will suffer similar to last year but if he reverts to running of HB then Gold.
Mids: Thomas - Interesting but will he outscore Pendles or Swan or other prems. (Caddy may be gold if he fires.
Rucks: A1
Forwards: Sound
Rookies not commenting on and in my case waiting for whole of NAB cup. Not sold on getting excited on 2 20 minute halves of football. These next 2 weeks will be a better indication. This is also reason why my rookies have not changed a lot since posting.
Overall 8/10 for your team
68.4k in the banks sorry
And yeah thanks ringo...i agree with you, adock and grimes are risky, ill check out my options...thomas is a unique, but if i get the money he will turn into swan :D
Quote from: Cevap Roll on February 27, 2012, 10:42:45 PM
Quote from: MC on February 17, 2012, 09:59:08 PM
Mids are pretty strong - but could you better use the cash to beef up your forward line? Better rookies available in the midfield, who are capable of higher scores.
Im with MC on this one.
Sure up your forward line.
??? Rioli, Zaha, Brown. IMO they are risks. Could pay off however dont score high often enough.
I only have brown from that list...check the updated team a few posts above or if you cant be bothered...
$68,400
Backs: goddard shaw birchall adcock grimes clarke bugg <wilkes morris>
Mids: thomas ablett selwood caddy horsley neale<pfieffer brown>
Rucks: mcevoy leuenberger <stepehenson giles>
Fwds: franklin fyfe martin sidebottom brown hampton smedts <weedon couch>
BACKS: solid side there but i don't know about grimes either upgrade or dongrade him to a lake, hargrave, etc. i think they will be better options
MIDS: looks super strong and i like the 3prem 3rook structure.. caddy is a jet!
RUCKS: cant fault, bloody perfect
FORWARDS: i have a few opinions here, mainly on brown and martin. martin will be a great player and a possible keeper this year but starting off at f3 and with his draw i think you need a gun in front of him.. i also have no faith in j.brown getting back to his 100+ games regularly and think that he isnt worth getting in, even at his price
8.638/10
Quote from: felsty on February 28, 2012, 11:43:13 AM
BACKS: solid side there but i don't know about grimes either upgrade or dongrade him to a lake, hargrave, etc. i think they will be better options
MIDS: looks super strong and i like the 3prem 3rook structure.. caddy is a jet!
RUCKS: cant fault, bloody perfect
FORWARDS: i have a few opinions here, mainly on brown and martin. martin will be a great player and a possible keeper this year but starting off at f3 and with his draw i think you need a gun in front of him.. i also have no faith in j.brown getting back to his 100+ games regularly and think that he isnt worth getting in, even at his price
8.638/10
thanks! Some good ideas
Grimes-->hargrave would be an interesting one, certainly free up $$$ and not losing much scoring potential!
imo martin is a gun and at that price and the bye he has, really works well in my team.
Brown is an interesting one...i agree with you that he cant get back to 100+ but at that price there is no one in the forward line with better value :)
As a result of all the outstanding help ive been receiving...ive made some more changes :D
5.5k
Goddard shaw birchall enright grimes clarke bugg <darley morris>
ablett selwood priddis caddy horsley hampton <brown wagner>
mcevoy l.berger <giles stephenson>
Franklin goodes martin sidebum brown smedts weedon <saad pfeiffer>
You like? :)
Yeah, very solid. I like the Caddy choice, I reckon he'll explode once he's back from the US - should easily top 80+ ppg. Will be a quick upgrade in rd 8 or so I reckon, maybe earlier.
Your team is very similar to mine - this is what happens in Rate my SC! Haha
I like it. Personal opinions on a few players but that doesn't matter, not here to be bias.
Overally sound structure. I think the Grimes pick is fine, more worried about the Adcock pick :P
8.5/10
For all the J Brown doubters, google Jonathan Brown 2012. He looks the best shape in his life, and consider that he missed 2011 with a broken face (or two), which isn't particularly a recurring injury in the same sense as a hamstring or ACL is, then I think 2012 will be a fantastic year for Browny. He's priced to average between 70 and 75, and the fact that the Lions play Melbourne, Fremantle, Gold Coast, GWS and North Melbourne all before their Round 11 bye, I think he could get at least an 85+ average, making the investment pretty worthwhile if you ask me.
Quote from: MC on February 28, 2012, 11:59:57 PM
Yeah, very solid. I like the Caddy choice, I reckon he'll explode once he's back from the US - should easily top 80+ ppg. Will be a quick upgrade in rd 8 or so I reckon, maybe earlier.
Your team is very similar to mine - this is what happens in Rate my SC! Haha
haha cheers mate
Quote from: JamSainter on February 29, 2012, 12:04:43 AM
I like it. Personal opinions on a few players but that doesn't matter, not here to be bias.
Overally sound structure. I think the Grimes pick is fine, more worried about the Adcock pick :P
8.5/10
Dont have adcock atm...check the post 2 above urs :D
Quote from: McBayne on February 29, 2012, 12:26:33 AM
For all the J Brown doubters, google Jonathan Brown 2012. He looks the best shape in his life, and consider that he missed 2011 with a broken face (or two), which isn't particularly a recurring injury in the same sense as a hamstring or ACL is, then I think 2012 will be a fantastic year for Browny. He's priced to average between 70 and 75, and the fact that the Lions play Melbourne, Fremantle, Gold Coast, GWS and North Melbourne all before their Round 11 bye, I think he could get at least an 85+ average, making the investment pretty worthwhile if you ask me.
I agree mate, cheers
LATEST SIDE!!!
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
Gday Jayman!
Backs - Good, im not a fan of Hargrave tho
Midfield - Risky with Caddy, Horsley and Hampton all on the field but could pay off, Id have Dylan Shiel instead of Brown on the bench as well
Rucks - Safe for 200+ 20 at least 20 weeks of the year
Forwards - Solid, not sure on the amount of games the Skinner will get tho
Overall, not a bad side, 8/10
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,49406.0.html
Quote from: Jayman on February 29, 2012, 09:06:35 PM
LATEST SIDE!!!
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
A few iffy picks. Rookies need revising but lotsa Nab left for that. Ur premiums are solid. 7.5/10
Quote from: Dylbags on February 29, 2012, 09:14:15 PM
Gday Jayman!
Backs - Good, im not a fan of Hargrave tho
Midfield - Risky with Caddy, Horsley and Hampton all on the field but could pay off, Id have Dylan Shiel instead of Brown on the bench as well
Rucks - Safe for 200+ 20 at least 20 weeks of the year
Forwards - Solid, not sure on the amount of games the Skinner will get tho
Overall, not a bad side, 8/10
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,49406.0.html
surely youd rather h.grave than lake??? I like my mids mate!!! I agree with u about rucks :) skinner is a gun haja
Quote from: Jayman on February 29, 2012, 09:06:35 PM
LATEST SIDE!!!
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
hope i got the right side, thanks again for your feedback on mine.
DEF: Solid - great picks, i like three bulldogs midpriced backs hard to split them (lake/hargrave/howard)
MID: solid again - caddy is a super high altitude cow ! :)
RUCK: rock solid
FWD: solid - same as backs great picks - martin has a tough draw early on but he wont care total gun.
8.5/10 maybe 9 if caddy come through nroo returns to form and hargrave continues nab cup form will be a super team.
Quote from: Jayman on February 29, 2012, 09:06:35 PM
LATEST SIDE!!!
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
so im gonna explain my team and the choices ive made!!!
Backs: pretty stock standard, as you can see i havent got lids due to his tough draw and hammy problems. Hargrave has come in for grimes...i think hargrave will be a good pick this year and far less risky compared to lake
Mids: 3-3 structure IS the way to go...as you can see ive got 3 TOP mids accompanied by imo good rookies...not sure on horsley as he hasnt played nab at all but when he does, he will gun it and obviously magner has to be elevated and caddy is a jet :) as you can see i have links to the defence and forwards (in hampton and brown).
Rucks: no surprises there :) pretty good imo
Fwds: i like my premium choices in buddy goodes and martin...out of those martin is the least capable of averaging 105+ but i still think he's worth it at his price and dpp! Sidebum and nroo are risks but both will pay off i think...im not sure on skinner and h.smith but all rookies are available to dropping!!! Nab will tell
My bye structure is:
2-3-4 in backs
2-3-3 in mids
2-1-1 in rucks
2-4-3 in fwds
This strategy is the best for coping with the byes...and limiting donuts, mpp will help also
I only have $300 which is a bit sad but every cent has been spent well haha. So who likes my team?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 01, 2012, 10:46:52 PM
Quote from: Jayman on February 29, 2012, 09:06:35 PM
LATEST SIDE!!!
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
hope i got the right side, thanks again for your feedback on mine.
DEF: Solid - great picks, i like three bulldogs midpriced backs hard to split them (lake/hargrave/howard)
MID: solid again - caddy is a super high altitude cow ! :)
RUCK: rock solid
FWD: solid - same as backs great picks - martin has a tough draw early on but he wont care total gun.
8.5/10 maybe 9 if caddy come through nroo returns to form and hargrave continues nab cup form will be a super team.
yeah right side mate :) i agree with u on the bully backs...i think hargrave is 1st at this stage! I think caddy is a gun!!! Martin does have a tough draw, but like you said...GUN
CHEERS COLLI
Ive done a bit of shuffling around an ive come up with a new side :D
$45,300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett boyd selwood caddy HOGAN magner <pfeiffer brown>
l.berger Z.SMITH <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes cyril martin sidebum weedon saad <h.smith hampton>
So do you like this side more than my previous one?? Here it is if you cant find it
Quote from: Jayman on February 29, 2012, 09:06:35 PM
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
Just personal but with a bit of tinkering can come at second team. Like the second team forward line with Weedon there.
Everyone seems to be jumping on the Hogan bandwagon after last night. Would like to see how he goes in the next 2 weeks myself. Was on Ablett and looked ok but Ablett is Ablett. If he gets these lock down roles may not be value at $163k.
If comfortable with Ruck Strategy ok.
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2012, 05:28:36 PM
Just personal but with a bit of tinkering can come at second team. Like the second team forward line with Weedon there.
Everyone seems to be jumping on the Hogan bandwagon after last night. Would like to see how he goes in the next 2 weeks myself. Was on Ablett and looked ok but Ablett is Ablett. If he gets these lock down roles may not be value at $163k.
If comfortable with Ruck Strategy ok.
Ok...so which team would you rather???
Sorry Second team has the more promise in my opinion.
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2012, 05:45:24 PM
Sorry Second team has the more promise in my opinion.
ok so just to make sure...you prefer this team
Quote from: Jayman on February 29, 2012, 09:06:35 PM
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
Quote from: Jayman on March 03, 2012, 05:47:39 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2012, 05:45:24 PM
Sorry Second team has the more promise in my opinion.
ok so just to make sure...you prefer this teamQuote from: Jayman on February 29, 2012, 09:06:35 PM
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
My bad. It is the team that you have with $45k cash left, I was calling it second team as it was posted after the other team. Sorry.
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2012, 05:52:26 PM
Quote from: Jayman on March 03, 2012, 05:47:39 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2012, 05:45:24 PM
Sorry Second team has the more promise in my opinion.
ok so just to make sure...you prefer this teamQuote from: Jayman on February 29, 2012, 09:06:35 PM
$300
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke bugg <smedts morris>
ablett swan selwood caddy horsley hampton <wagner brown>
mcevoy l.berger <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes martin sidebum nroo weedon skinner <horlin-smith pfeiffer>
My bad. It is the team that you have with $45k cash left, I was calling it second team as it was posted after the other team. Sorry.
haha no worries at all mate! I appreciate your help...ive just finetuned the team that you selected with 45k left
Will post it as my official new team :)
LATEST SIDE!!!
$45,000
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <hampton brown>
l.berger smith <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes cyril martin sidebum weedon cameron <pfeiffer h.smith>
Just bear in mind Cameron suffered a corked thigh today so watch. Also keep an eye on Devon Smith as an alternate to Pfeiffer if he does not get elevated.
Like that you have Martin at F4 as you can cope with his early tough draw. Just hope Cyrils hammies do not twang before byes. You will be coping the donut in Round 13 with Franklin, Cyril and Martin.
Also if Caddy does not come up look at Kane Lucas who has similar potential at same price.
8.5/10 for the Team - Virtually set apart from finalising rookies.
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2012, 07:47:34 PM
Just bear in mind Cameron suffered a corked thigh today so watch. Also keep an eye on Devon Smith as an alternate to Pfeiffer if he does not get elevated.
Like that you have Martin at F4 as you can cope with his early tough draw. Just hope Cyrils hammies do not twang before byes. You will be coping the donut in Round 13 with Franklin, Cyril and Martin.
Also if Caddy does not come up look at Kane Lucas who has similar potential at same price.
8.5/10 for the Team - Virtually set apart from finalising rookies.
yeah ill watch cameron, looked good tho! I liked smith as well! If i bring dev in for pfeiffer then ill have to restructure the forwards but definitely an option. Im confident in cyril :) yes ill have to find out a way to not have 2+ premiums out per position in bye rounds...caddy is a gun mate, i think ill be holding onto him, presuming he is named rnd 1
LATEST SIDE!!!
approx. $50,000
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mcevoy h-mac <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield weedon saad <pfeiffer h.smith>
Only player im not sure about is danger....i could go cheaper and get porps but having a 220k player as my f5 seems a bit risky...then again i have done that in my backs tho???
Quote from: Jayman on March 04, 2012, 12:16:22 PM
LATEST SIDE!!!
approx. $50,000
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mcevoy h-mac <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield weedon saad <pfeiffer h.smith>
Only player im not sure about is danger....i could go cheaper and get porps but having a 220k player as my f5 seems a bit risky...then again i have done that in my backs tho???
Im not sure on danger at the moment either he is in my team but far from locked, if sidearse looked half decent he wouldnt be but he didnt so hi is...
great backline cant fault it. 3+1 mids strong enough, solid rucks if hmac continues his form, great fwd line if danger can continue his scoring with thomo and vanberlo back??
solid side no weaknesses
Quote from: Jayman on March 04, 2012, 12:16:22 PM
LATEST SIDE!!!
approx. $50,000
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mcevoy h-mac <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield weedon saad <pfeiffer h.smith>
Only player im not sure about is danger....i could go cheaper and get porps but having a 220k player as my f5 seems a bit risky...then again i have done that in my backs tho???
backs: solid no problems here i like the birchall move he should average over 100 this year with hawthorns style of play
mids: caddy is the interesting one he hasnt played at all yet this year and only saw a little bit last year so still very unknown for mine alot of hype around him. cant fault it otherwise :)
rucks: as you said same as mine :)
forwards: i like it a little unsure with danger as you said but he has to break out at somestage :)
8/10 :) well done pal.
Quote from: Jayman on March 04, 2012, 12:16:22 PM
LATEST SIDE!!!
approx. $50,000
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mcevoy h-mac <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield weedon saad <pfeiffer h.smith>
Only player im not sure about is danger....i could go cheaper and get porps but having a 220k player as my f5 seems a bit risky...then again i have done that in my backs tho???
Backs - great line, love hargrave at d5 and the others speak for themselves
Mids - great again although hogan looks like tagging so be careful of that.. will rise in cash regardless i suppose
Rucks- solid, have a good feeling about hmac ;)
fwds - solid again, hopefully danger will rise to the occasion THIS year
cant really say any improvements.. just keep watching nab. few players im iffy on like martin in first few rounds, hargrave, and i reckon you could save money downgrading caddy and hogan considering they are only going to be cash cows anyway
if you have the time give mine a rate http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,49763.0.html
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 04, 2012, 01:17:02 PM
Im not sure on danger at the moment either he is in my team but far from locked, if sidearse looked half decent he wouldnt be but he didnt so hi is...
great backline cant fault it. 3+1 mids strong enough, solid rucks if hmac continues his form, great fwd line if danger can continue his scoring with thomo and vanberlo back??
solid side no weaknesses
sidearse did play well actually...getting subbed off affected his score
As i said...danger is risky and im not sure i want him in my team but he has great potential and is one of the only decent options with a rnd11 bye
Quote from: ando_10 on March 04, 2012, 04:01:06 PM
backs: solid no problems here i like the birchall move he should average over 100 this year with hawthorns style of play
mids: caddy is the interesting one he hasnt played at all yet this year and only saw a little bit last year so still very unknown for mine alot of hype around him. cant fault it otherwise :)
rucks: as you said same as mine :)
forwards: i like it a little unsure with danger as you said but he has to break out at somestage :)
8/10 :) well done pal.
only reason caddy hasnt played yet is because he went to arizona for altitude training, which is good i guess :)
Quote from: felsty on March 04, 2012, 06:54:10 PM
Backs - great line, love hargrave at d5 and the others speak for themselves
Mids - great again although hogan looks like tagging so be careful of that.. will rise in cash regardless i suppose
Rucks- solid, have a good feeling about hmac ;)
fwds - solid again, hopefully danger will rise to the occasion THIS year
cant really say any improvements.. just keep watching nab. few players im iffy on like martin in first few rounds, hargrave, and i reckon you could save money downgrading caddy and hogan considering they are only going to be cash cows anyway
if you have the time give mine a rate http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,49763.0.html
yer hogan does look like tagging but has still scored very well in nab....i do see where your coming from with caddy and hogan
LATEST SIDE!!!
40.9k
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mcevoy h-mac <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes fyfe martin sidebottom weedon saad <pfeiffer kerridge>
New changes:
Sidebum and kerridge IN FOR danger and horlin-smith
cheers for the help with my team.
now for urs:
defence: perfect. but downgrade clarke. shaw is enough pie coverage.
mids: i reckon ur one gun short. perhaps downgrade hogan and upgrade caddy as u already have selwood and ablett.
rucks: good. but i'd probably go for mumford (nice fixtures) and mcintosh can be downgraded to redden
fwds: fine. perhaps get dangerfield instead of martin for early fixtures / cash. check rookies.
8.5 - 9/10
Quote from: Jayman on March 06, 2012, 05:47:10 PM
LATEST SIDE!!!
40.9k
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave clarke darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mcevoy h-mac <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes fyfe martin sidebottom weedon saad <pfeiffer kerridge>
New changes:
Sidebum and kerridge IN FOR danger and horlin-smith
Ah I did have Sidebottom in above danger but I took him out.. Like to know your thoughts on this!
Great backs although I hate broughton and his yoyo scores.. Watch Clarke didn't play great on the weekend
Confused by the caddy pick.. Possible premium or just cash cow? I would look at ditching him for a rookie and upgrading mcevoy!
Perfect forwards. I swear everyone's forward line is going to look like this before round 1 lol
9/10 I would just look at upgrading mcevoy. I'm a saints man and love the guy but there are a lot of better blokes out there IMO
Great side nonetheless
Thanks for your input guys! Im looking at upgrading mcevoy to mumford!? But ive figured it would have to come at the expense of marty clarke! I will let you know when ive finalised a team with the new rucks. Will probably look something like this:
*TENTATIVE, NEW, EXPERIMENTAL TEAM*
Goddard shaw BIRCHALL/ENRIGHT/HEPPEL broughton hargrave SPURR/WEBBERLEY/ELLIS darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
MUMFORD h-mac <giles o.steph>
franklin goodes fyfe martin sidebottom weedon SAAD/HORLIN-SMITH <pfeiffer kerridge>
thoughts?
Love the/our new team! Pretty perfect in my books and don't worry too much about Clarke.. He hasn't really lit it up so far in the nab and there are better rookies around!! 9.57/10
Quote from: felsty on March 07, 2012, 12:29:26 PM
Love the/our new team! Pretty perfect in my books and don't worry too much about Clarke.. He hasn't really lit it up so far in the nab and there are better rookies around!! 9.57/10
ahaha cheers mate. I'll probly end up keeping birchall as my D3, due to my bye structure that forces me to change saad-->horlin-smith. Ellis will probably end up being my D6 :)
In that way we differ. Perhaps it's my bias but I'm a Saints man and can see this Egyptian freak-of-nature winning 13 cars over the season for his goals of the year! Just hope Ramadan doesn't stop him :S
Quote from: felsty on March 07, 2012, 12:44:18 PM
In that way we differ. Perhaps it's my bias but I'm a Saints man and can see this Egyptian freak-of-nature winning 13 cars over the season for his goals of the year! Just hope Ramadan doesn't stop him :S
i actually think ellis will be my D6!
Well i have no choice! If i want to keep birchall as my D3 instead of enright/heppel i have to get rid of a rnd 13 forward for a rnd 12 one...therefore saad-->horlin-smith makes sense yeah? In case your wondering why, its due to my bye structure
Team solid jayman. My only quibble is playing 2 rookie fwds on the park. Darling, tapscott and matera were last years best and they avg 65-70 ish between them. Meanwhile duigan, heppel, lower and stanley avg 10 ppg more. Obviously a lot of other factors come into that but id much sooner play 2 def or 3 mid rookies than 2 fwd rookies. Just worth considering.
Maybe downgrade caddy to shiel and try and get porpoise in fwds?
*LATEST SIDE*
27.7k
Goddard shaw birchall broughton hargrave ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mumford h-mac <giles redden>
franklin goodes fyfe martin sidebottom weedon horlin-smith <pfeiffer kerridge>
Quote from: PICCOLLO on March 07, 2012, 01:05:49 PM
Team solid jayman. My only quibble is playing 2 rookie fwds on the park. Darling, tapscott and matera were last years best and they avg 65-70 ish between them. Meanwhile duigan, heppel, lower and stanley avg 10 ppg more. Obviously a lot of other factors come into that but id much sooner play 2 def or 3 mid rookies than 2 fwd rookies. Just worth considering.
Maybe downgrade caddy to shiel and try and get porpoise in fwds?
I see what you mean...but i really want caddy in my team! Dont you have faith in weedon or h-smith or pfeiffer or kerridge. And devon smith can go into forwards as well, and i could get smedts in there as well!
Quote from: felsty on March 07, 2012, 12:29:26 PM
Love the/our new team! Pretty perfect in my books and don't worry too much about Clarke.. He hasn't really lit it up so far in the nab and there are better rookies around!! 9.57/10
Great call! Haha! Definite cheer for that :)
Definitely better having a combined thread than 14* individual ones though!
*At last count
i'd down grade Sandi to someone like Z Smith, Kreuzer or McIntosh and use the cash to beef up your forward line
sorry just saw the updated team, comment retracted.
Quote from: Jayman on March 07, 2012, 01:20:14 PM
Quote from: PICCOLLO on March 07, 2012, 01:05:49 PM
Team solid jayman. My only quibble is playing 2 rookie fwds on the park. Darling, tapscott and matera were last years best and they avg 65-70 ish between them. Meanwhile duigan, heppel, lower and stanley avg 10 ppg more. Obviously a lot of other factors come into that but id much sooner play 2 def or 3 mid rookies than 2 fwd rookies. Just worth considering.
Maybe downgrade caddy to shiel and try and get porpoise in fwds?
I see what you mean...but i really want caddy in my team! Dont you have faith in weedon or h-smith or pfeiffer or kerridge. And devon smith can go into forwards as well, and i could get smedts in there as well!
I have faith in treloar getting 70 avg on the wing but gws fwds wont get many opportunities.
Caddy set to be a gun but pricey given shiel will likely be even better.
Quote from: MC on March 07, 2012, 08:34:12 PM
Quote from: felsty on March 07, 2012, 12:29:26 PM
Love the/our new team! Pretty perfect in my books and don't worry too much about Clarke.. He hasn't really lit it up so far in the nab and there are better rookies around!! 9.57/10
Great call! Haha! Definite cheer for that :)
Definitely better having a combined thread than 14* individual ones though!
*At last count
haha
Quote from: j on March 07, 2012, 08:39:08 PM
i'd down grade Sandi to someone like Z Smith, Kreuzer or McIntosh and use the cash to beef up your forward line
Quote from: j on March 07, 2012, 08:42:31 PM
sorry just saw the updated team, comment retracted.
No worries mate :)
Quote from: PICCOLLO on March 07, 2012, 09:51:46 PM
Quote from: Jayman on March 07, 2012, 01:20:14 PM
Quote from: PICCOLLO on March 07, 2012, 01:05:49 PM
Team solid jayman. My only quibble is playing 2 rookie fwds on the park. Darling, tapscott and matera were last years best and they avg 65-70 ish between them. Meanwhile duigan, heppel, lower and stanley avg 10 ppg more. Obviously a lot of other factors come into that but id much sooner play 2 def or 3 mid rookies than 2 fwd rookies. Just worth considering.
Maybe downgrade caddy to shiel and try and get porpoise in fwds?
I see what you mean...but i really want caddy in my team! Dont you have faith in weedon or h-smith or pfeiffer or kerridge. And devon smith can go into forwards as well, and i could get smedts in there as well!
I have faith in treloar getting 70 avg on the wing but gws fwds wont get many opportunities.
Caddy set to be a gun but pricey given shiel will likely be even better.
treloar is good, but has injury troubles yeah? Same with sheil!
* LATEST SIDE!!! *
Goddard shaw birchall HEPPEL hargrave ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mumford h-mac <giles redden>
franklin goodes PAVLICH martin DANGERFIELD PORPLYZIA COUCH<pfeiffer HORLIN-SMITH>
thoughts??
Cash left Jay?
Def: Sound -
Mids: Sound - Just personal but not a fan of Murphy this year at M2. Just concerned that Gibbs and Judd will takes points off each other this year. Just another Option Rockliff. Priddis or Swallow.
Rucks. Sound
Forwards Great
Rate 9/10
about 2k left! would u rather nds than murph?
Reasonable unique but you can not afford him.
Quote from: Ringo on March 09, 2012, 10:12:33 PM
Reasonable unique but you can not afford him.
oh shower! Forgot about that :/
Might have to stick with marc then aye? Should still have a good year imo
Liking the look of your side here Jayman
Def: Cant fault, Heppel is a great unique if he can continue last years form
Mids: Hope Caddy can give you something as M4! other than that looks good
Ruc: Hmac is a risk, but if he gets enough game time will score highly
Fwd: great picks
9/10!
Quote from: Jayman on March 09, 2012, 06:20:41 PM
* LATEST SIDE!!! *
Goddard shaw birchall HEPPEL hargrave ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan magner <d.smith brown>
Mumford h-mac <giles redden>
franklin goodes PAVLICH martin DANGERFIELD PORPLYZIA COUCH<pfeiffer HORLIN-SMITH>
thoughts??
cheers for helping with my team.
defence: nice. heppell is a gamble but if he lifts his game then he'll be a great pick.
mids: id downgrade hogan and upgrade caddy to a premium. hasn't shown much in preseason games.
rucks: fine.
fwds: gerat. maybe downgrade pavlich as porpus is to dear for a f6. then use money to upgrade mids
Hi Jayman,
I would leave out Hogan as he was bad today. Miles is playing better so i would look at bringing him in the other player you could look at is Koby Stevens.
Apart from that you have a strong team. I give your team a 8.5/10. The way Martin played today you couln't leave him out.
dyson should go ok. I like the picks of caddy and h-mac! caddy teared up tonigh and is a lock! and hamish IS the best midpriced ruckman. hogan will probably just hold his spot in my team, would be gone if neale hadnt got injured!!! i think porps is the perfect f6 given the lack of rookie fwds.
*LATEST SIDE*
16k
Goddard shaw birchall heppell hargrave ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan KAVANAGH <d.smith MILES>
Mumford h-mac <giles redden>
Franklin goodes pavlich martin dangerfield porplyzia couch<HALL h-smith>
a couple of rookie changes...you like?
Thanks for the rate and that on my team, heres my feedback on yours.
backs - love them, as they are very similar to mine, cant fault.
mids - three guns three rooks seems to be the go this year, and caddy is going to be a very good pick up! not sold on kavs job security thought.
rucks - not sold on h mac just yet, wouldnt have him personally.
forwards - porplyzia is almost to expensive for f6, i would downgrade dangerfield to saad, and use the cash to upgrade macintosh to cox, could be a huge ruck combo that way!
9/10, few educated risks but should be worth it, good team!
Quote from: JamesHarden13 on March 11, 2012, 06:42:16 PM
Thanks for the rate and that on my team, heres my feedback on yours.
backs - love them, as they are very similar to mine, cant fault.
mids - three guns three rooks seems to be the go this year, and caddy is going to be a very good pick up! not sold on kavs job security thought.
rucks - not sold on h mac just yet, wouldnt have him personally.
forwards - porplyzia is almost to expensive for f6, i would downgrade dangerfield to saad, and use the cash to upgrade macintosh to cox, could be a huge ruck combo that way!
9/10, few educated risks but should be worth it, good team!
yeah im hoping caddy guns it :D im not sold on kav either but what other rnd12 bye options do I have now that neale has gone down! I think h-mac will have a good year, and at that price he is very hard to ignore. I like porps as f6 because atm the forward line rookies are weak this year, so starting 2 would result in some low scores. So you think cox/saad will outscore danger/h-mac? Cheers mate, helped a lot :)
TEAM A- 16k left!Goddard shaw birchall heppell lake ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett murphy selwood caddy hogan kavanagh <d.smith miles>
Mumford h-mac <giles redden>
Franklin goodes pavlich martin dangerfield porplyzia couch<hall h-smith>
TEAM B- 34k leftGoddard shaw birchall broughtonl lake ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett swan selwood caddy hogan wingard <d.smith miles>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield porplyzia couch<pfeiffer h-smith>
which team?
Will assess this way Jay
Backs: Difference between Broughton and Heppell favour Broughton Slightly
Mids: Basically difference between Swan and Murphy, Swan winds no question
Rucks: Cox/Reddan v Mumford/Hmac With Cox outstanding form and working out H Mac with Goldstein in Petrie would slightly favour Cox/Reddan
Forwards: Choice between Pav and Fyfe and I would possibly call this even.
So what does this say basically Team B has the better scoring potential imo. Others may differ though.
*LATEST SIDE*
70k
Goddard shaw birchall broughton lake ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett swan selwood caddy hogan clifton <d.smith miles>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield porplyzia couch<pfeiffer h-smith>
what do ya think of the new team? I have enough $$$ to do birchall-->deledio? Disappointed i cant trade danger-->harvey tho!
Ok but I can only see 12 real premiums.
Some have claimed up to 15 - but that's BS isn't it?
Deledio for later I think. Draw from hell - Carlton in the game that has made the Tigers Carlton's baitch / Collingwood on the rebound (Go Hawks) / Melbourne (OK may win this) / Geelong @ Geelong (2 in a row unlikely) / WCE!
Going for Hogan and Caddy a bit greedy maybe? If you let one go for a rookie priced rookie you can afford Boomer.
Also Lake and Porps are other non rookie priced starters who could go well but will cost you a premium I think.
Quote from: tor01doc on March 12, 2012, 10:20:40 PM
Ok but I can only see 12 real premiums.
Some have claimed up to 15 - but that's BS isn't it?
Deledio for later I think. Draw from hell - Carlton in the game that has made the Tigers Carlton's baitch / Collingwood on the rebound (Go Hawks) / Melbourne (OK may win this) / Geelong @ Geelong (2 in a row unlikely) / WCE!
Going for Hogan and Caddy a bit greedy maybe? If you let one go for a rookie priced rookie you can afford Boomer.
Also Lake and Porps are other non rookie priced starters who could go well but will cost you a premium I think.
yeah 12 premiums + my mid-pricers, danger, caddy, porps, lake. Yeah i think ill settle with birchall for now! Im set on caddy...i want him in my team! Not fussed on hogan but what other options do I have? Lake and porps are locks i think :)
*LATEST SIDE*
50k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton lake ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett pendles selwood caddy miles clifton <kerridge kavanagh>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes pav martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer couch>
Quote from: Jayman on March 13, 2012, 11:53:33 PM
*LATEST SIDE*
50k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton lake ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett pendles selwood caddy miles clifton <kerridge kavanagh>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes pav martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer couch>
Backs: Can't really fault you here, very much stock standard field line up. Only thing is with the rookies not sure how their JS is, Morris seems to be fighting for a position with ellis and B Ellis is in front. Smedts for obvious reasons playing at Geelong but he will definitely get games just not sure how early.
Mids: Obviously the first 3 are dominant nothing to complain about there. But with caddy do you think he will average above 75-80? Personally you might as well find a decent rookie/mature age around 106k-130 (or Magner if he comes up) and get the same scores. Haven't seen much of Kavanagh so not sure what's going on there.
Rucks: If that's the stragery you're going for that's prefect. (can possibly upgrade if downgrade porpz and caddy)
Forwards: Very strong all the way on the field. Porpz is a personally preference, is a great pick if he fits in your team. He will give you an 85 avg at his best. Wait and see on couch and pfeffier is a solid choice.
Quote from: Jayman on March 13, 2012, 11:53:33 PM
*LATEST SIDE*
50k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton lake ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett pendles selwood caddy miles clifton <kerridge kavanagh>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes pav martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer couch>
Gone for pretty much
exact same structure as me, but with different player selections.
May want to fix your mid field rookies. Extremely critical you nail these.
Good luck, its looking good :)
Quote from: Bosh on January 01, 1970, 01:41:56 PM
Backs: Can't really fault you here, very much stock standard field line up. Only thing is with the rookies not sure how their JS is, Morris seems to be fighting for a position with ellis and B Ellis is in front. Smedts for obvious reasons playing at Geelong but he will definitely get games just not sure how early.
Mids: Obviously the first 3 are dominant nothing to complain about there. But with caddy do you think he will average above 75-80? Personally you might as well find a decent rookie/mature age around 106k-130 (or Magner if he comes up) and get the same scores. Haven't seen much of Kavanagh so not sure what's going on there.
Rucks: If that's the stragery you're going for that's prefect. (can possibly upgrade if downgrade porpz and caddy)
Forwards: Very strong all the way on the field. Porpz is a personally preference, is a great pick if he fits in your team. He will give you an 85 avg at his best. Wait and see on couch and pfeffier is a solid choice.
thanks mate...great advice :D
im unsure on smedts and morris but what other options are there?
im VERY confident in caddy 80+ average im expecting...and a bargain at 200k imo! i too dont want kavanagh but since neil and magner got injured i was struggling for rookies.
Quote from: charliesheen link=topic=48411.msg675423#msg675423 date=1331649
Gone for pretty muchu]exact[/u] same structure as me, but with different player selections.
May want to fix your mid field rookies. Extremely critical you nail these.
Good luck, its looking good :)
yeah ill try and fix them up...apart from kavanagh which other rookies would you get rid of?
Quote from: charliesheen on March 14, 2012, 01:45:49 AM
Quote from: Jayman on March 13, 2012, 11:53:33 PM
*LATEST SIDE*
50k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton lake ellis darley <smedts morris>
Ablett pendles selwood caddy miles clifton <kerridge kavanagh>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes pav martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer couch>
Gone for pretty much exact same structure as me, but with different player selections.
May want to fix your mid field rookies. Extremely critical you nail these.
Good luck, its looking good :)
Well, Bugg for a starters should proabably be in before Morris and Smedts.. then there isn't a whole lot more just have another look at NAB this week and rd 1 teams. Magner should be right though. :)
Solid Jayman. Caddy is an issue - regardless of bye strat etc, 80k extra for a rookie isnt advisable. Downgrade him and see where you could use that 80k. Even keeping it, allowing an accerated, one trade upgrade in r4-5 is better.
Quote from: PICCOLLO on March 14, 2012, 10:22:15 PM
Solid Jayman. Caddy is an issue - regardless of bye strat etc, 80k extra for a rookie isnt advisable. Downgrade him and see where you could use that 80k. Even keeping it, allowing an accerated, one trade upgrade in r4-5 is better.
caddy is a lock mate! scored 60dt from 44% TOG on the weekend just to back me up ;)
What are you expecting Caddy to average?
Quote from: Jayman on March 14, 2012, 11:59:16 PM
Quote from: PICCOLLO on March 14, 2012, 10:22:15 PM
Solid Jayman. Caddy is an issue - regardless of bye strat etc, 80k extra for a rookie isnt advisable. Downgrade him and see where you could use that 80k. Even keeping it, allowing an accerated, one trade upgrade in r4-5 is better.
caddy is a lock mate! scored 60dt from 44% TOG on the weekend just to back me up ;)
Not a bad stat - but keep in mind that he was playing against GWS and he came on with fresh legs for the second half of a game without many stars in the middle. I do like him though, just don't take that stat to make your decision.
80+ i think carliesheen. anyway, there arent many other rookies on offer...btw i brought magner in for kav
*LATEST SIDE*
16.6k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton malceski ellis darley <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood redden miles shiel <couch magner>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin porplyzia d.smith kerridge <pfeiffer dickson>
Im not 100% sure but i wanted to try something different...ive goe eski as my D5, is absolutely killing it in nab and worth 360k yeah? Ive gone a 4-2 premium midfield...with jack reddej coming in for caddy, it has come at the expense of my forwards with dickson coming in for danger! Thoughts?
Solid Team for the structure you have gone for.
One thing I have learned this year with Salary Cap depending on structure used one line has a perceived weakness. In your case you have a strong mid with a weaker forward line.
Malceski may be good for you if he can stay injury free and maintain NAB cup form.
thanks mate...sorry swan is my M2 not pendles
Yeah my forwards has become weaker but still has the 4 premiums + porps.
Quote from: Jayman on March 17, 2012, 08:17:39 PM
*LATEST SIDE*
16.6k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton malceski ellis darley <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood redden miles shiel <couch magner>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin porplyzia d.smith kerridge <pfeiffer dickson>
Im not 100% sure but i wanted to try something different...ive goe eski as my D5, is absolutely killing it in nab and worth 360k yeah? Ive gone a 4-2 premium midfield...with jack reddej coming in for caddy, it has come at the expense of my forwards with dickson coming in for danger! Thoughts?
ive stratched this team...
Which team???
50k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton lake ellis darley <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood caddy miles clifton <couch magner>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer kerridge>
21.9k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton lake ellis darley <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood rockliff miles clifton <couch magner>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin porplyzia d.smith kerridge <pfeiffer dickson>
Team 50K.
I reckon Caddy will be a great pick. And Danger is great value - definitely the equal of those around the $500 K ( Petrie / Zaha / Lewis / Gray / Robinson / Adams ) and saves you $65 and gets DPP and they have a relatively easy draw to start.
Good luck.
thanks mate
*LATEST SIDE*
8.7k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton malceski ellis darley <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood caddy ledger shiel <kennedy magner>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer dickson>
Thoughts?
no one likes the new team? ^^^
Quote from: Jayman on March 20, 2012, 09:32:58 PM
*LATEST SIDE*
8.7k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton malceski ellis darley <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood caddy ledger shiel <kennedy magner>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer dickson>
Thoughts?
Backs: Not sure about having three tigers in the one line, though I have noticed a few teams with that combination today. Aside from that good line.
Mids: Good premiums and pretty good rookies as well. Don't think it needs to be said to watch for whether Magner is elevated and over the injury.
Rucks: Good.
Forward: Again strong. I'm not sure Pfeiffer is the best rookie option going around but that's nitpicking.
Overall 9/10
think you need another premium mid. i'd downgrade malceski for lake or hargrave and porpis for a rookie and then upgrade caddy.
otherwise strong 8/10
rate me back http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,51647.0.html
Quote from: ChinKing on March 21, 2012, 08:20:47 PM
think you need another premium mid. i'd downgrade malceski for lake or hargrave and porpis for a rookie and then upgrade caddy.
otherwise strong 8/10
rate me back http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,51647.0.html
what if I wanted caddy and porpoise and wanted a 3-premium mid?
reckon Caddy better as a DT pick than SC myself. not sure worth the $$$ in SC
yeah was a bit of a let down last week with his poor SC score! rather coniglio? or go even cheaper and try and get tom lynch (crows) in for porpoise or maybe try and squeeze pendles in for swan?
Which combo? Cox & Porps or Mummy & Lynch
Ok at first look i bet you'll all say cox/porps...but let me explain! Cox cant get better, and with nic nat gradually getting more ruck time and cox has been played up forward which will limit his scoring! Mummy on the other hand can improve and I believe will average 115+...porps is the common F6/7 option but he will be playing key foward, resulting in inconsistent scores and his shoulders are a worry too. Lynch will play a sort of high-half forward role and has no injury troubles and he has a higher points per time on ground during nab!
And by the way my team is
8.7k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton malceski ellis darley <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood caddy ledger shiel <kennedy magner>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer dickson>
Quote from: Jayman on March 22, 2012, 06:38:33 PM
Which combo? Cox & Porps or Mummy & Lynch
Ok at first look i bet you'll all say cox/porps...but let me explain! Cox cant get better, and with nic nat gradually getting more ruck time and cox has been played up forward which will limit his scoring! Mummy on the other hand can improve and I believe will average 115+...porps is the common F6/7 option but he will be playing key foward, resulting in inconsistent scores and his shoulders are a worry too. Lynch will play a sort of high-half forward role and has no injury troubles and he has a higher points per time on ground during nab!
And by the way my team is
8.7k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton malceski ellis darley <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood caddy ledger shiel <kennedy magner>
Cox redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith<pfeiffer dickson>
I'm going Mummy not for the same reasons, but that he should dominate 1st 1/2 of the season based on the draw. In that time the 3 rookies should fatten up more than adequately to pick up the No1 Ruck for the Year. So even if it is still Cox, you aren't going to pay any more than you would starting Cox and bringing in a more expensive Mummy.
Personally don't know alot about Lynch, but if your gut says this unique is worth the punt, then that could be the difference b/w you and the masses.
Food for thought thou, Porps has an easier run than most , potencially allowing larger scores in that key forward role. So at his price, having a rolecoaster b/w weaker and tougher opposition, it shouldn't deter people from taking that punt on him.
Great team either way.
thanks mate, top post! You have a team you want me to take a look at?
The only concern I have with Mummy when going with the 1/3 Ruck structure is his history of suspensions and injuries which is ok if you have another prem but relying then on 2 rookies to score big for any period is a risk. He misses 4/5 games per year and would hate to see this at start of year before rookies fatten up. He is a little inconsistent with 10 scores below 100 including 3 below 70. Averages 47.6 hit outs per game which aids SC scoring. Admitedly he has a reasonable draw which may result in big scores but need to wigh up against possible games missed.
Cox is extremely durable and has only missed 9 games since the start of the 2008 season. Can not see Cox's average falling much even with Nats increased time on Ground. Cox is very consistent with only 6 scores below 100 and only 2 below 70.
Have looked at Lynch myself but eventually went with Porps due to draw and the form he showed in NAB cup final. Either choice is sound.
Trust this helps a little.
Thanks for the advice! Ive taken it on board and come up with a new team...
10k
Goddard shaw deledio broughton malceski ellis clarke <bugg morris>
Ablett swan selwood caddy magner shiel <pfeiffer mcdonald>
Mumford redden<giles o-steph>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin dangerfield porplyzia d.smith <kennedy dickson>
Hey Jayman,
Your team is EXTREMELY similar to mine...scarily so lol
Therefore I reckon it looks good haha
10/10!
Please rate and comment mine :)
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,52303.0.html
Team looks good.
Bit a worry with Malceski. But could work out for you.
8.5/10
Rate mine please
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,52509.0.html
looks great, slightly different to most other teams out there!
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,52490.0.html
thanks guys...will rate your soon :)
And...conglio or caddy?
LATEST SIDE!
31k
Goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski guthrie ellis <bugg morris>
Ablett boyd selwood caddy shiel magner <mcdonald pfeiffer>
Mumford redden <giles stephenson>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin danger porps smith <dickson kennedy>
Quote from: Jayman on March 27, 2012, 06:31:51 PM
LATEST SIDE!
31k
Goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski guthrie ellis <bugg morris>
Ablett boyd selwood caddy shiel magner <mcdonald pfeiffer>
Mumford redden <giles stephenson>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin danger porps smith <dickson kennedy>
Backs: Not sold on Guthrie maybe look at Clarke or Bower instead. Aprt from that its quite a awesome line-up
Mids: Solid
Rucks: Fine
Forwards: I would personally pick Hall over Dickson. Although Dickson has more JS Hall has a higher ceiling and with a team with no risky picks (Apart from Guthrie) why wouldn't you risk him
Overall: 9.5/10
Great Work Jayman!
I have a new dilemma... http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,53441.0.html
!!!LATEST SIDE!!!
3.9k
goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski guthrie ellis <morris bugg>
ablett boyd selwood watson shiel magner <mcdonald pfeiffer>
Mumford redden <giles stephenson>
Franin goodes fyfe martin porps smith hall <dickson kennedy>
team going into rnd 1...for now ;)
9.7k
goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski smedts ellis <morris bugg>
ablett boyd selwood murphy shiel magner <mcdonald pfeiffer>
Mumford redden <giles stephenson>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin porps smith hall <dickson kennedy>
score: 2083 :/
a very poor week by me... hoping for at least 2100... i was a bit unlucky ho:
backs: broughton, enough said, smedts and Ellis were on my field, bugg on bench
mids: very pleased with my premiums + magner! sheil=let down!
rucks: wouldve like 20 more from mummy
fwd: goodes Martin porpoise should all up their game by 20! all my fwd rookies were shower apart from Kennedy !
no trades this week but next week i might squeeze in mohr/ clay for underperforming rooks and broughton will get the sack!
Jayman don't worry about your problems this week
Broughton will be fine. Too many people are going of him. He'll definitely get 100 next week
Shiel is a gun. Best 18 year old in the country. Projected to be a top 3 pick until he was prelisted.
Mummy I was surprised with. I reckon he'll be great next week
Goodes I was unsure with. Hopefully this isn't the season where his age gets to him
Martin never plays well against Carlton. Plus he was tagged.
score: 2129 overall: 52,052
not overly happy...it's a decent score but doesn't get me anyway in overall!
trades considering: hall-->milera & broughton-->hibberd
Hall-->milera is done...should i go broughton-->dempsey as well¿
Wouldn't be so quick to get rid of Hall - Bock back this week will free him up a bit and provide plenty of crumbs for him around the packs. Milera has performed well against some terrible opposition, what happens when their run gets harder? Is he likely to drop out when their proven senior players return?
be interested to see what your thoughts are on broughton jayman, im in pretty much in the exact same boat - struggling with what to do with him and ranked a little behind you - although our team structure is completely different.
my plan was to downgrade broughton and coniglio to marty clarke and toby greene, keeping $400k in the kitty for two quick upgrades but i feel as if getting two rookies in will only hurt my scores further and my rankings will slip away quite quickly. what do you think? little bit of pain for a huge gain?
Quote from: MC on April 11, 2012, 12:33:03 AM
Wouldn't be so quick to get rid of Hall - Bock back this week will free him up a bit and provide plenty of crumbs for him around the packs. Milera has performed well against some terrible opposition, what happens when their run gets harder? Is he likely to drop out when their proven senior players return?
i went dickson-->milera instead. Purely because hall is named and dickson isnt :)
Yeah milera might not play every game this year but will still make quick $$$
Quote from: felsty on April 11, 2012, 08:24:13 AM
be interested to see what your thoughts are on broughton jayman, im in pretty much in the exact same boat - struggling with what to do with him and ranked a little behind you - although our team structure is completely different.
my plan was to downgrade broughton and coniglio to marty clarke and toby greene, keeping $400k in the kitty for two quick upgrades but i feel as if getting two rookies in will only hurt my scores further and my rankings will slip away quite quickly. what do you think? little bit of pain for a huge gain?
my thoughts:
Broughton is a good footballer but isnt fantasy relevant atm due to his role
At best he will be up and down all year...could still average 90 odd
Will drop a lot in price this week so now is time to trade (dempsey geary clarke etc)
Dont listen to above statement if you want to ride the rollercoaster 8)
I like your trades mate! As long as you use the cash wisely when you need to!
So after 1 trade (dickson-->milera)... team going into round 3
5k
goddard deledio(C) shaw broughton malceski morris bugg <ellis(E) smedts>
ablett(VC) boyd selwood murphy shiel magner <mcdonald ledger(E)>
Mumford giles <redden stephenson>
Franklin goodes fyfe martin porps kennedy milera <hall smith(E)>
1. Yes deledio is my captain :D
2. Should I trade broughton-->dempsey
3. Should I select an 'E' in my rucks?
I changed a did the Milera trade also ;)
I'm looking at ditching Broughton, like you said in the above statement - he is almost fantasy irrelevant ATM.
Not sure to who though.. If I had the money I would go to Birchall but ATM tossing up between Malceski and Dempsey.. Haven't discounted just keeping him though and saving the trade
As a precaution I would name an emergency Ruck. If Mummy is a late withdrawl again you will pick up at least 60 points with Redden.
I am perservering with Broughton this week to see what his role will be against Brisbane. If he is given another lock down role on Rockliff or Rich then he will be outski but if given run in mids then maybe keep. Mundy also named so this should be the guide.
Hoping Broughton does not fall too much in value as I am considering a straight swap to Bock if he towells it up this week.
ballsy call on Delidio but can understand your reasoning as Hocking traditionally keeps Ablett quiet.
Quote from: Ringo on April 13, 2012, 11:15:29 AM
As a precaution I would name an emergency Ruck. If Mummy is a late withdrawl again you will pick up at least 60 points with Redden.
I am perservering with Broughton this week to see what his role will be against Brisbane. If he is given another lock down role on Rockliff or Rich then he will be outski but if given run in mids then maybe keep. Mundy also named so this should be the guide.
Hoping Broughton does not fall too much in value as I am considering a straight swap to Bock if he towells it up this week.
ballsy call on Delidio but can understand your reasoning as Hocking traditionally keeps Ablett quiet.
what line would you take the 'E' off? Presuming mids?
Broughton is tearing my hair out! One thing for sure is that he will lose value this week and dempsey will rise! Now might be the time to offload???
Yeah and lids should kill it :D
Quote from: Jayman on April 13, 2012, 12:59:32 PM
what line would you take the 'E' off? Presuming mids?
Broughton is tearing my hair out! One thing for sure is that he will lose value this week and dempsey will rise! Now might be the time to offload???
Yeah and lids should kill it :D
Keep Broughton - he has a much higher chance of becoming a keeper than Dempsey. It will be semi-unique having him after this week and it could pay off big time!
Yep take E off of the mids, and slap it on Redden - i'm not sold on Mummy just yet
round 3 score : 2191 Rnd 3 ranking: 16304 Overall ranking: 25,097 Average league position: 4.8
very happy with my week! Went up 25,000 places in overall AND won all my league games :D
HEROES
•Sir Gregory Broughton showed the haters he can still score well
•Tom Bugg best backline rookie by a mile
•G. Ablett although i made a mistake by not giving him the 'C' his 182 was superb and is know my perma-captain 8)
•All mid premiums did well (murphy selwopd boyd ablett all cracked 130 and 2 cracked 140!
VILLIANS
•Fyfe's shoulder flowered itself up again :/
•Martin's scores are giving me the showers
•Terry Milera was excellent in the first two game but of course when i bring him in......
•my forward line only scored 515 points
How my team is looking:
5.1k
Goddard deledio malceski shaw broughton bugg morris <ellis(E) smedts>
Ablett(C) murphy selwood boyd(VC) magner mcdonald <shiel(E) ledger>
Giles Mumford <redden stephenson>
Franklin goodes kennedy porplyzia fyfe martin milera <smith hall>
trades im looking at:
fyfe-->someone haha
Team looks good. Could easily be ranked much higher if not for captaincy and starting rookies. No Pendles and holding onto Broughton is proving to be quite the master stroke.
Personally, I would consider Chappy as a straight swap, despite his dismal performance on the weekend.
Thanks CS...chappy is an option mate thinking sidearse at this stage tho!
Quote from: MC on April 13, 2012, 01:40:37 PM
Keep Broughton - he has a much higher chance of becoming a keeper than Dempsey. It will be semi-unique having him after this week and it could pay off big time!
8)
Trades considering:
Fyfe-->sidearse
shaw->carrazzo
Mumford-->sandi
think im only going mummy to sandi...BUT i feel holding fyfe is risky!
Mummy, Shaw, Fyfe, Goodes .... Hmmm .... how did that work out for you??
Carnage everywhere for a lot of teams, mate!
Quote from: GoldDigger on April 21, 2012, 09:46:19 AM
Mummy, Shaw, Fyfe, Goodes .... Hmmm .... how did that work out for you??
Carnage everywhere for a lot of teams, mate!
not too good mate...at least I dont have any 0s :/
Trades I made:
Fyfe-->sidearse
Mummy-->sandi
Mummy to Sandi was good for you. For your info watched the game last night and although he had some treatment on legs in second quarter ran the game out strongly especially in the forth quarter when game was there to be won. IMO if there was concern with him and with Clarke also in the team would not have continued with him in the ruck.
Cheers for that Ringo
Good trades. Mummy > Sandi, extremely risky but could pay off big time. Personally too much risk for me.
Quote from: charliesheen on April 21, 2012, 11:44:56 PM
Good trades. Mummy > Sandi, extremely risky but could pay off big time. Personally too much risk for me.
dont see the risk in it mate? Was more hesitant locking in fyfe > sidearse...mumford has a back problem that has caused him to only play 2 games out of 4...made sense to jump of then & there :)
Round 4 score: 2147 overall: 13323 round 4 rank: 13000 average league position: 3.6
Quite happy with my round...didnt lose a league game and went up 11,774 places in overall
Heroes
Backline rookies (bugg morris ellis)
Joel Selwood (still the best selwood showed with a class 144)
Jon Giles (could be a keeper at this rate)
Eski (boosted his average to 93 and took his price to +400k)
My trade-ins (sandi and sidearse both comfortably cracked the ton scoring 230 between them)
Porplyzia (took his price up 40k)
Villians
Boyd (scored <90...now averaging <110...price went down 21k
Martin (averaging 75...enough said)
My starting fwd rookies (hall smith kennedy- scored 140)
how my team is looking
85k 21 trades
Goddard deledio malceski ellis broughton bugg morris <shaw smedts(E)>
Ablett(C) murphy(VC) selwood boyd magner mcdonald <shiel(E) ledger>
Giles sandi <redden stephenson>
Franklin goodes kennedy porplyzia sidearse martin milera <smith(E) hall>
trades i am looking at
ledger-->treloar
Like us all probably keeping a watch on Ablett.
Will be doing the same trade myself Ledger > Treloar.
Keep an eye on Kennedy his B/e are now positive and with the low scores he has had in the last 2 games may be time to cash him over the next couple of weeks. Also Millera he has a b/e of 33 this week. So you may want to consider.
I am keeping an eye on Browny - He had his swagger back on Saturday Night after taking a couple of contested marks. Price will probably drop a little due to low score in first game back. Would be a steal if price dropped to $350k perfect downgrade/upgrade. Perfect F7 if he averages 90 for year.
Yo charliesheen, ringo, gold digger, tor01doc, MC, ANYONE :D
I am looking at only 1 trade for this week as I have already used 3...that trade is ledger-->treloar! i am copping a donut in my rucks but doubt I will do anything about it...
Please help :)
Ledger to Treloar is fine.
Sandi will be in and out would be tempted to bite the bullet and go Sandi to Nic Nat and pocket $93k Nic Nat is 3rd in ruck averages so far so you can not go to wrong. Your decision though.
wow ringo...didnt even consider it!!! But could work...would sandi to nicnat be a waste of a trade since I just traded sandi in last week for mummy!
I think i need a tad more convincing :D
I'm with Ringo ...
Ok... In regards to the ruck.
Option A)
Bite the bullet take Naitanui on the cheap and pretend this never happened. Assumes these type of stupid injuries will occur, and he will fade in 2nd half of season.
Option B)
Assume Sandilands will be the highest scoring ruck of 2012, averaging close to ~115+, missing about 2-3 games, with 1 game not covered by rookie score.
Take a pick on the assumption you want to make. Neither is correct or incorrect. With the way Redden/Orren are looking each game Sandilands misses may be potentially a donut using the 3RR structure.
Quote from: GoldDigger on April 26, 2012, 10:24:44 PM
I'm with Ringo ...
care to elaborate GD?
Quote from: charliesheen on April 27, 2012, 12:18:10 AM
Ok... In regards to the ruck.
Option A)
Bite the bullet take Naitanui on the cheap and pretend this never happened. Assumes these type of stupid injuries will occur, and he will fade in 2nd half of season.
Option B)
Assume Sandilands will be the highest scoring ruck of 2012, averaging close to ~115+, missing about 2-3 games, with 1 game not covered by rookie score.
Take a pick on the assumption you want to make. Neither is correct or incorrect. With the way Redden/Orren are looking each game Sandilands misses may be potentially a donut using the 3RR structure.
I sense you are leaning towards trading sandi then? Ill admit it has merit...you see what I mean tho as I only traded him in last week ::) sandi has turned injury prone and as you said CS by the looks of it donuts will come...if you can tell me that if you were in my situation* you would trade him out I would happily do it!
*my situation- having just traded in sandi....have already used 3 trades (not including ledger > treloar this week)...have an easy league game this week (next week not so easy)
I'm neutral 8)
I can understand if you can keep him or trade him out of your team. If league only, yeah keep him.
Like I said, it comes down to the assumptions you want to make.
If you assume Sandilands season's total will still be greater than all the other rucks, you keep him. This assumes you have adequate cover.
If you assume Naitanui/Ryder/etc can match his season's total @ 100K+ cheaper you should really trade.
Now I am biased, because I strongly believed people should never have started either Sandilands or Mumford with the 3RR structure, because the risks out weigh the benefits.
I also believe Naitanui will easily average ~105 sc, and is currently underpriced and basically a 100% lock for me next year.
Your call... I think your trade situation is okay tbh, and save a lot of heart attacks.
Plenty of food for thought there CS!!! Think im leabing towards holding as sandi should repay the faith when he returns....
I'm in the same boat Jay - traded in Sandi for Mummy last week and intend to keep him. I already had Nic Nat however, and think Giles is a more than adequate cover. Can you justify 2 sideways ruck trades in the space of two weeks? ZCould be that NicNat goes down and Sandi is back next week... then what? :o
Quote from: MC on April 27, 2012, 01:19:21 PM
ZCould be that NicNat goes down and Sandi is back next week... then what? :o
Delete team?
Quote from: charliesheen on April 27, 2012, 01:44:37 PM
Quote from: MC on April 27, 2012, 01:19:21 PM
ZCould be that NicNat goes down and Sandi is back next week... then what? :o
Delete team?
Lol +1
I'd actually consider it!
Think im gonna hold sandi...doing ledger-->treloar tho :D
Round 5 score: 1864 Overall: 25212 round 5 rank: 119687 league position: 2
dropped down 11,889 places in overall and dropped to 2nd in my main league!
my team:
86.3k 20 trades
Goddard deledio malceski ellis broughton bugg morris <shaw smedts(E)>
Ablett(C) murphy(VC) selwood boyd magner mcdonald <shiel(E) treloar>
Giles sandi <redden stephenson>
Franklin goodes kennedy porplyzia sidearse martin milera <smith(E) hall>
anyone have any trade ideas?????????
Wait and see who is named. With Sandilands in your team, I would consider Porps > Roughead. Which may mean downgrading Devon Smith to Horsley or Pfieffer.
Means next time Sandilands misses, just downgrade one of your rucks to Rowe/Pattison/etc.
Quote from: charliesheen on April 30, 2012, 07:39:28 PM
Wait and see who is named. With Sandilands in your team, I would consider Porps > Roughead. Which may mean downgrading Devon Smith to Horsley or Pfieffer.
Means next time Sandilands misses, just downgrade one of your rucks to Rowe/Pattison/etc.
does sound like a good plan CS!!! Bit premature to trade out porps tho???
Any more thoughts???
Porps > cheapest ruck MPP
Redden > roughead
enough cash to do that?
Sandilands looking like missing agian.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 01, 2012, 06:15:06 PM
Porps > cheapest ruck MPP
Redden > roughead
enough cash to do that?
Sandilands looking like missing agian.
50k off mate :/
Ive done the calculations and these are my trade options:
Double trade:
Porps-->5fa
Magner-->hayes/barlow
Porps-->5fa
Magner-->danger/zaha/beams/lewis/robinson/pav
Porps-->5fa
Magner (sub kennedy/treloar)-->roughead
OR
just the one trade:
Porps-->5fa
D.smith-->5fa
Or simply stick with having 20 trades 8)
Don't trade your best mid rookies.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 01, 2012, 11:11:55 PM
Don't trade your best mid rookies.
so u think I should just downgrade porps/smith?
Don't know even if Porps is named yet. Devon Smith downgrade is going to be a 50/50 call.
Wow...ablett gone for 2-3, sandi out for ???, selwood a 50/50 to play, heath shaw!
Gonna be another tough week, not sure what i can do tho :/
Ok so I am keeping ablett....would like to bring roughy into ny fwds and in future downgrade redden-->rowe/pattison, dont think i can do it this week tho without losing magner who isnt ripe.......im still tossing up whether to offload smith to gain
pfeiffer
thoughts?
P.S havent ruled out swapping sandi with nic nat
I would probably go Smith>Pfieffer if you needed the cash for some trade next week, like Roughead. I wouldn't be against grabbing Horsley a week early either.
Think you should back your judgment on Sandilands that he will be the highest averaging ruck in 2012 and this will offset games missed.
Roughead has a BE of 128, so it wouldn't hurt to get another look at him. Would be nice to get him before Melbourne though, seeing what Rockliff did to them playing up forward.
Hopefully you get a price rise out of Redden too.
Ok ill keep the faith in sandi...if redden/stephenson dont play then ill cop a donut...make it worse Im vsing the top team this week (who is averaging 2.6ppg more than me)...he doesnt have sandi
Always surprise when teams are out...in a nutshell:
• sandi, stephenson, redden OUT so will cop a 0
• kennedy back in
• hall still out
• treloar out
• shaw back
Still considering d.smith-->pfeiffer but since he is named and hall isnt...trade hall-->pfeiffer instead...and hopefully smith can score 80 and go up in price this week 8)
Yeah I don't mind D.Smith > Pfieffer if named. Would probably just leave your rucks given the Naitanui situation and tank this round.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 03, 2012, 11:50:27 PM
Yeah I don't mind D.Smith > Pfieffer if named. Would probably just leave your rucks given the Naitanui situation and tank this round.
what about long-term mate? Redden and Stephenson look out of it and sandi is sure to miss game here and there? Might be worth fixing it up now?
Who does everyone else have as rucks in your leagues?
Quote from: charliesheen on May 04, 2012, 12:04:46 AM
Who does everyone else have as rucks in your leagues?
guy im vsing this week has natanui and jacobs...lucky ba$tard ;)
Quote from: Jayman on May 04, 2012, 12:06:30 AM
Quote from: charliesheen on May 04, 2012, 12:04:46 AM
Who does everyone else have as rucks in your leagues?
guy im vsing this week has natanui and jacobs...lucky ba$tard ;)
and guy top by total points has natanui/giles
Resisted the urge......still got 20 trades
Very happy i didnt trade...devon with 110!!!!! Nic nat pulled out, pfeiffer is sub
Score: 1980
League Position: 1
Disapointing score but won my league game (by 22). This week i need to take advantage of some downgrade targets e.g horsley/adams...also stevieJ is looking at a very cheap price!
Here's my team:
86.3k. 20 trades
Goddard deledio malceski ellis broughton bugg morris <shaw smedts(E)>
Ablett(C) murphy(VC) selwood boyd magner mcdonald <shiel(E) treloar>
Giles sandi <redden stephenson>
Franklin goodes kennedy porplyzia sidearse martin milera <smith(E) hall>
WHAT DO I DO????
Alt+F4
Quote from: MC on May 10, 2012, 10:58:58 PM
Alt+F4
nice advice mate!!! I dont want to close my browser so im not gonna alt+f4.
What good does a useless post like that do? NONE
Chill out mate.
Shiel onto field for McDonald - Treloar as E
Goodes needs to be traded - I suggest a keeper such as Pavlich rather than Stevie J - he's had only one game over 70...
I made the Magner --> Horsley trade this week, so i'd suggest that also.
20 down to 18 trades is sufficient at this stage. Most people allocate 2-4 trades for rookie adjustments anyway.
Quote from: MC on May 11, 2012, 12:13:07 AM
Chill out mate.
Shiel onto field for McDonald - Treloar as E
Goodes needs to be traded - I suggest a keeper such as Pavlich rather than Stevie J - he's had only one game over 70...
I made the Magner --> Horsley trade this week, so i'd suggest that also.
20 down to 18 trades is sufficient at this stage. Most people allocate 2-4 trades for rookie adjustments anyway.
knew you had it in you mate! :)
What do you think: Kennedy-->Adams & Goodes-->Pendles
looks good Jayman but... hard to pass up the Horse!
Quote from: tbagrocks on May 11, 2012, 08:40:06 AM
looks good Jayman but... hard to pass up the Horse!
yeah that's the only problem...if I want Pendles I have to take adams over horse! Could take both but then Pendles will keep rising....
yep, nows the time to get Pendels, Horse is much bett at DT anyway, the gap is much closer with Adams in SC ;)
Quote from: tbagrocks on May 11, 2012, 09:02:15 AM
yep, nows the time to get Pendels, Horse is much bett at DT anyway, the gap is much closer with Adams in SC ;)
yeah thats what I thought! :)
ATTENTION GUY...
ive locked in Goodes and Kennedy to Adams and Pendles!!!
PROs
now have a 5 premium midfield
have a fresh cash cow
CONs
have a 3 premium forward line, have 3 rookies starting
missed horsley
lose mpp
DO THE PROs OUTWEIGH THE CONS?
Quote from: Jayman on May 11, 2012, 09:20:00 AM
Quote from: tbagrocks on May 11, 2012, 09:02:15 AM
yep, nows the time to get Pendels, Horse is much bett at DT anyway, the gap is much closer with Adams in SC ;)
yeah thats what I thought! :)
ATTENTION GUY...
ive locked in Goodes and Kennedy to Adams and Pendles!!!
PROs
now have a 5 premium midfield
have a fresh cash cow
CONs
have a 3 premium forward line, have 3 rookies starting
missed horsley
lose mpp
DO THE PROs OUTWEIGH THE CONS?
yeah I think so mate! you'll have all day to think about it lol
yeah ive thought about it and...............PENDLES YOUR IN!!!!!
Quote from: Jayman on May 11, 2012, 05:57:18 PM
yeah ive thought about it and...............PENDLES YOUR IN!!!!!
great move! I made the mistake of taking Rocky ahead of him :'( ::)
should I trade hall-->adams instead!? still get pendles tho!?
Score: 2394
League: Easy win...still top!
Im happy with my week! Malceski and Murph, I expected more!!! 150 betweem those to prevented me from 2400 grrr
Trades considering:
Bugg-->Spurr
Porplyzia-->Roughead(would help with rucks)/SteveJ(negative b/e)
(also keeping my one on matt priddis to become my final premium mid in a few weeks...a shiel or magner swap looks likely there!
Team:
96k 18trades 1st in league
Goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski bugg morris <ellis(E) smedts>
Pendlebury ablett murphy boyd selwood magner <shiel mcdonald>
Sandi giles <redden stephenson>
Franklin sidebottom martin porplyzia adams treloar d.smith <milera hall>
As you can see my forward line is shower, having 4 non-keepers starting, 6 in total...hall and porplyzia are upgrade options this week!
Ok im thinking
a) one trade ellis-->spurr
b) double trade ellis-->spurr & hall-->?
Keeping bugg becuae I need all the round 11 bye defenders I can get ad getting rid of ellis because he has a high b/e and isnt in need of being played in bye rounds.......im keeping porps becuase I think he can hold an F7 until I get around to my last fwd upgrade and we all saw how st kilda's small forwards destroyed carlton on Monday
I think a lot depends if you plan on tanking the byes, and which bye you plan on tanking.
You don't really need another R12 back rookie like Spurr. Already have Broughton, Shaw, Malceski, Smedts.
good to have you backs CS!
im not really planning to tank the byes, but I.dont think i have to really worry about them as I am undefeated in my league...as long as I finish top 4 ill be happy :) of course I dont want to completely bomb out in all 3.rounds tho and see my overall go down and down and down as I see finishing with best average at end of season a critical bragging right!
no I dont NEED another rnd 12 defender but spurr is tempting! and im not sure on Brennan's and Wilkes' JS
I think the trade will be situational because I am not sure Spurr is going to be the next Nick Lower. There could be plenty of other rookies like Zorko, Sexton, Darley, etc which will you allow you to upgrade the backs to suit the byes rather than downgrade.
Also Jenkins might be a legitimate option so you may not need the Roughead/Pattison combination.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 16, 2012, 07:48:19 PM
I think the trade will be situational because I am not sure Spurr is going to be the next Nick Lower. There could be plenty of other rookies like Zorko, Sexton, Darley, etc which will you allow you to upgrade the backs to suit the byes rather than downgrade.
Also Jenkins might be a legitimate option so you may not need the Roughead/Pattison combination.
yeah good call! spurr isnt a must ill admit!!
what do you think of porps-->lake (smedts fwd)??? it would give me an extra rnd 11 defender and an extra round 12 fwd which is what I need! while also getting rid of a rnd 12 defender and a rnd 11 fwd :D
my forward line would become sh!thouse tho!!!
thoughts?
Lake is a tricky one.
I reckon hold trade, and bring in Zorko and R12 premium forward next week.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 16, 2012, 08:32:25 PM
Lake is a tricky one.
95 3-round average and a >90 5-round average! At 380k (i think) pretty good price for proven premium.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 16, 2012, 08:32:25 PM
I reckon hold trade, and bring in Zorko and R12 premium forward next week.
yeah a possibility! Porps and Milera out for Zorko and steveJ/beams/zaha!?!?!? Only problem is almost now-or-never for steveJ and Zaha as both have un-missable breakevens.......
This is what I would personally do.
Porplyzia > Harvey
Goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski bugg morris <ellis(E) smedts>
Pendlebury ablett murphy boyd selwood magner <shiel mcdonald>
Sandi giles <redden stephenson>
Franklin sidebottom martin harvey adams treloar d.smith <milera hall>
Shiel > Zorko
D.Smith > Zaharackis
Goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski bugg morris <ellis(E) smedts>
Pendlebury ablett murphy boyd selwood magner <zorko mcdonald>
Sandi giles <redden stephenson>
Franklin sidebottom martin harvey zaharackis adams treloar <milera hall>
... Hope Sexton comes on bubble now.
Good luck :)
thanks mate :)
harvey??? really??? been shower this year!!!!! whitecross/blair instead?
i like shiel-->zorko! would enable mpp which i like.
likewise with Dsmith-->Zaha all good :) but harvey?? cheers buddy
ya 430k for single trade is too hard to pass up. porplyzia has done his job. pretty confident he will come good, averages 124 against port adelaide this week.
boomer always does this, the issue is always with "timing" when to get him into your team. get him in too early, you cop all those showerty scores.
yep 430k for a proven 100ppg is good value...could drop more with a b/e in the mid-120s
porps is gone I agree with that :)
im also confident boomer will come back as well but when? hasnt shown any signs yet?
whitecross is tempting with his mid-50 b/e...also cheaper than harvey and averaging more :D
Your going to need R11 premium at some stage. The only real options are Danger & Boomer really.
430K for proven & durable R11 forward too hard to pass up. You should be happy you paid peanuts for him.
Keep forgetting your going for leagues. One thing you may consider is tanking R12 and avoiding the weak R11 options. This could mean selling Bugg for Spurr this week.
R12: Swan, Pendlebury, Selwood, Kennedy, Watson, Stanton, SJ, Chapman, Beams, Sidebottom, Zaharackis, Duffield, Heppel, etc...
So many good options.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 16, 2012, 10:34:26 PM
Your going to need R11 premium at some stage. The only real options are Danger & Boomer really.
430K for proven & durable R11 forward too hard to pass up. You should be happy you paid peanuts for him.
yep good call :)
if i wanted danger i could get him by: ellis-->spurr & porps -->danger
would screw my rnd 12 backs tho!!! gotta weigh up the pros & cons!
correct me if im wrong...dont I need a rnd 12 fwd??? as my only one is sidey atm
Mix 13 & 12's don't worry about round 11's unless they are on your bench. Mainly 12's though.
Tanking R12 means, getting as many R12's as possible.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 16, 2012, 11:01:15 PM
Mix 13 & 12's don't worry about round 11's unless they are on your bench. Mainly 12's though.
Tanking R12 means, getting as many R12's as possible.
not sure i 100% see where you are coming from (all this bye stuff is to much for bloke like me) but i trust your judgement...so yeah if another rnd 11 bye forward is critical then it will be done ;)
harvey or brown or danger (2trades) hmmmmm
Think ill go ellis-->spurr & porps-->danger
Thoughts??
bugg-->delaney
&
hall-->zaha
Score: 2324
League position: 1
16trades 13k Going for league
Goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski morris ellis <delaney smedts>
Ablett pendles boyd selwood murphy mcdonald <magner shiel>
sandi giles <o-steph redden>
buddy zaha martin sidearse porps adams treloar <d.smith milera>
Trades considering:
magner-->zorko (returns my mpp link)
If murphy is an LTI then him to a super-premium
If murphy isnt an LTI then porps-->super-premium
hmmm murphy is gone!!!
So murphy is must go and zorko must come in...so murphy-->zorko then upgrade magner/porps???
You need to keep your non-r11 rookies.
Murphy > Zorko
GWS rookie not named > R12 premium fwd.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 22, 2012, 12:51:48 PM
You need to keep your non-r11 rookies.
Murphy > Zorko
GWS rookie not named > R12 premium fwd.
cheer CS...missed ya last week
Murphy-->Zorko looks good
& depending on teams
Porps/non-playing gws rookie-->Danger?
It doesnt have to be a rnd 12 forward does it? Got zaha last weel for that purpose...sidey is there as well
Danger might cause problems with your setup. Take R12.
Murphy > Zorko
Porps > Crameri
You like???
The thing is, id rather trade out Magner or even Milera over Porplyzia!?
If you can keep Porps, definitely do so. Trade any GWS rookies that are not named before considering him.
Not sold on Crameri personally.
looking at my bye structure...my setup atm is:
B: 1/4/4
M: 3/3/2
R: 1/2/1
F: 4/2/3
my ideal setup:
B: 2/4/3
M: 2/3/3
R: 2/1/1
F: 2/3/4
ideally i want to use 0 trades during bye rounds but just set up well before hand, resulting in limited donuts...
long-term trade plan:
Murphy > Zorko
gws rookie > rnd 13 bye forward
morris > darley
gws rookie > walsh
those above trades would leave my setup as:
B: 2/4/3 (perfect)
M: 4/3/1
R: 1/2/1
F: 2/3/4 (perfect)
then mids would become no.1 priority with old-mac and shiel having to be traded to 2 rnd 13 mids before rnd11!!!
how would be the best way to get to my ideal setup CS (any others)???
I would go R12 premium forward. Sexton & Darley might fix some of your other issues.
ahhh forgot about Sexy and his rnd 13 bye :P in that case I could go a rnd 12 forward and walsh would become Sexton. End up with same result just Crameri/Sexton over Lewis/Walsh!
comes down to opinion I guess of those 4 players...overall does the trading system look good? will.it.be too much of a struggle getting my mid structure set up right before rnd 11
I think it's doable. Doesn't have to be absolutely perfect. Most of these rookies are going to be a coin toss, just like Pfieffer a few weeks ago.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 23, 2012, 09:57:48 PM
I think it's doable. Doesn't have to be absolutely perfect. Most of these rookies are going to be a coin toss, just like Pfieffer a few weeks ago.
ok mate sounds good.
i know you dont like Stewie but what other options do I have??? Beams????
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/board,42.0.html
Murphy-->Zorko is locked in!
stumped on my next move...move magner on to Dal or upgrade porps?
Im thinking, since gws fwd rookies are named:
Murphy > Zorko
Porps > Danger
In the same boat however I had Magner and Murphy traded out for Danger and Zorks!
Porplyzia looks like he may have hit his straps so trading wouldn't be a bad idea, or me he is all about the plan to bring in Ablett next week ;)
Quote from: Jayman on May 25, 2012, 12:57:12 AM
Im thinking, since gws fwd rookies are named:
Murphy > Zorko
Porps > Danger
locked and loaded 8)
Sure you want a R11 forward?
Quote from: charliesheen on May 25, 2012, 06:11:42 PM
Sure you want a R11 forward?
i dont want to compromise my final team due to bye rounds...I NEED DANGER
I don't see how its going to hurt you grabbing Dangerfield at R12 or R13....
Its not like waiting another 2 weeks, is going to give you extra insight on the other premium forwards either.
Score: 19198......Round 9 Score 2131......Overall Ranking: 23909 of 357,136......Round 9 ranking: 23591 of 357,136......12,116/4,458 Weekly / Overall change......Rounds Played: 9......Average points per Round: 2133.1111111111......League Ranking: 1......Trades Remaining: 14 of 24......Team Value: 12,298,400......Change in Value: 2,242,600......Salary Cap Remaining: $193,200
Goddard deledio shaw broughton malceski morris ellis <delaney smedts>
Ablett pendles boyd selwood zorko mcdonald <magner shiel>
sandi giles <o-steph redden>
buddy zaha martin sidearse danger adams treloar <d.smith milera>
what trades?
Get rid of those R11's in the forwards/mids fast.
Smith > Darley
Adams > Forward
hello charlie,
thanks for the trade thoughts.
smith has a b/e of 42 and adams has a b/e of 51...both should rise this week but not by too much. i feel adams could cop a rest after his game on saturday...i still feel he should be higher than 250k?! smith however is very close to being maxed out IMO.
convinced on darley???????
keep morris in backs? i feel he's peeked???????
miss out on Sexy???????
what forward for Adams??????
BE is not very meaningful. Trade the R11 rookie who you don't think will play R12 and R13.
Chapman/SJ/Beams/NRiewoldt are all good options.
Not entirely sold on Darley, but we are at the point where you need to take gamble on rookies. Sexton you can always get the week after for a tiny bit more.
Yeah good call :) add mitchROBBO to the list of forwards????
We'll meet back here thursday evening yeah? ;)
Robbo definitely worth considering.
Quote from: charliesheen on May 29, 2012, 01:16:04 PM
Robbo definitely worth considering.
would be my pick of the bunch considering im going with the tank rnd13 strategy*
Thinking Smith&Adams > Darley(smedts fwd)&n-dal/robbo
Thoughts?
*i have come to a final decision that my bye round tactic will be to limit donuts in rounds 11&12 but avoid trading...rnd13 will be my nothing round as I am assured the win...therefore im trying to load up on rnd13 players (before rnd13 obviously)...n-dal & robbo come to mind.
Quote from: Jayman on May 29, 2012, 10:30:16 PM
Quote from: charliesheen on May 29, 2012, 01:16:04 PM
Robbo definitely worth considering.
would be my pick of the bunch considering im going with the tank rnd13 strategy*
Thinking Smith&Adams > Darley(smedts fwd)&n-dal/robbo
Thoughts?
*i have come to a final decision that my bye round tactic will be to limit donuts in rounds 11&12 but avoid trading...rnd13 will be my nothing round as I am assured the win...therefore im trying to load up on rnd13 players (before rnd13 obviously)...n-dal & robbo come to mind.
would love your thoughts on this if your out there CS!
Trades condering:
Adams & Smith > Sexton & Beams
Adams & Smith > Sexton & Dal
Adams & Smith > Darley & Beams
Adams & Smith > Darley & Dal
Morris & Magner > Darley & Dal
Morris & Magner > Darley & Beams
Morris & Magner > Scotland & Sexton
Thoughts? :)
Probably Darley trade and upgrade
You missing Horsley?
Quote from: charliesheen on May 30, 2012, 07:17:05 PM
Probably Darley trade and upgrade
You missing Horsley?
dont have Horsley :( im gutted i didnt pick him up....at the time I thought it was worth holding off him and getting Pendles instead...
Final edition of: Jayman's Round 10 Trade Options
•magner > dal santo
•magner > priddis
•morris > darley
•morris > darley & magner > any premium mid (kennedy/watson/thompson/rockliff)
•morris > darley & shiel > Dal (or any premium mid)
•smith > darley & adams > chappy/sj/beams/riewoldt
•morris > darley & smith > dal santo
•morris > darley & ellis > waters/scotland/enright
•morris > darley & smedts > waters/scotland/enright
•morris > darley & milera > premium
morris > darley & magner > NDS
Of those options Jay would go Morris to Darley and Smith to Dalsanto.
Quote from: Ringo on May 31, 2012, 09:33:36 PM
Of those options Jay would go Morris to Darley and Smith to Dalsanto.
sorry forgot to add: morris > darley & Magner > NDS
change anything?
added in other post think you may need Magner for bye coverage unless tanking in Round 11.
Quote from: Ringo on May 31, 2012, 10:19:08 PM
added in other post think you may need Magner for bye coverage unless tanking in Round 11.
definitely not tanking R11 mate...if I were to tank, R13 would be the one...just not really fussed about the byes in general...and im sure if anyone was in my exact position (sitting 1st, undefeated) they wouldnt be either!
morris > darley
smedts > scotland
Looks much better Jay.
Malceski dropped!!! Wow i can not catch a break :(
Do i hold eski and stick with original trade plans
Or
Change things up a bit...suggestions?
If you had planned to not hold Eski then and I know this sounds Drastic would replace Morris with Eski in your trades,
Quote from: Ringo on June 01, 2012, 07:30:17 PM
If you had planned to not hold Eski then and I know this sounds Drastic would replace Morris with Eski in your trades,
well i did think eski was a keeper, and still do....but now his 'dropping' and his terribleast few games has me reconsidering! arghhhhhh
not long now! help?
Score: 2347
League position: 1
Disapointed in Scotland, bring him in and he scores 85 and out for 3 weeks with a calf :( Pendles knee worry wasnt great but hopefully isnt too serious. Managed to still get the league win so im fairly happy...
12 trades...5.5k...going for league(1)
B: goddard deledio scotland broughton shaw malceski delaney <ellis darley>
M: ablett pendlebury boyd selwood shiel mcdonald <d.smith magner>
R: sandilands giles <redden stephenson>
F: franklin sidebottom dangerfield zaharakis martin zorko treloar <milera adams>
I think im not gonna trade for 5 weeks...my team is solid and should be able to cope with me saving trades...would love to get priddis however dont think its do-able at this stage...
Much cash Jay - Maybe Magner to Priddis in Round 12. Price fell again this week and with bye will be cheap in Round 12.
Quote from: Ringo on June 04, 2012, 06:54:24 AM
Much cash Jay - Maybe Magner to Priddis in Round 12. Price fell again this week and with bye will be cheap in Round 12.
only $5,500 mate :/
Gday CS, Ringo and others...
Just letting you know that i want six trades going into league finals...so barring LTI's i have a maximum of 6 trades to finalise my team...im still top of my league, a game clear, and have best percentage...so im in a great position to finish top 4...
12 trades...5.5k...going for league(1)
B: goddard deledio scotland broughton shaw malceski delaney <ellis darley>
M: ablett pendlebury boyd selwood shiel mcdonald <d.smith magner>
R: sandilands giles <redden stephenson>
F: franklin sidebottom dangerfield zaharakis martin zorko treloar <milera adams>
So what would be the best way to finish this team ^^^ using only 6 trades?
EDIT: starting to think D.Smith > J.Elliot is a good idea!?
Can post team your up against?
Quote from: charliesheen on June 04, 2012, 09:04:38 PM
Can post team your up against?
mate. Does it really matter? Im probly gonna losr, but i'll still be on top by percentage, whether I trade or not, ill be top...and its getting to the stagw where trades are vital! Just keep my situation in mind when opinionating CS! Anyway here is
HIS team....remember
HIS not mine:
B: deledio goddard clarke shaw grimes hargrave dempsey ellis darley
M: stanton pendlebury ablett dal-santo priddis d.smith horsley neale
R: natanui sandilands jenkins stephenson
F: franklin dangerfield sidebottom pavlich whitecross porplyzia pfeiffer zorko hall
Reckon you can finish top 4 by tanking 2 rounds of byes?
Scotland bit of an issue
Quote from: charliesheen on June 04, 2012, 11:42:59 PM
Reckon you can finish top 4 by tanking 2 rounds of byes?
Scotland bit of an issue
in short. Yes i do think I can still finish top 4! Im a game clear of 2nd and have best percentage! Might just add that im 3rd by total points, so im not invincible haha
Dont bring up Scotland mate! Bring him in for smedts...smedts late in, rises in price...scotland plays, scores 85, out for 3 weeks!!!!
Selling Smith good idea, not sure about Elliot. You can even take a stab in the dark at Tom Mitchell. He will get games eventually, and you don't care about byes anyway.
If I were to disregard byes. I would be keen on getting the following upgrades
BACKS: MJ & Waters
MIDS: JPK & Swan
FWDS: Beams, SJ, Chapman
Not sure bout Elliot either...but what other options are there? Sexton? Mitchell?
Ive been studying my team, and I actually only need 4 upgrades for now! D6, M5, M6, F5. This means id keep eski as D7 and zorko as F7 for a while, which im ok with...
So: 1 of treloar/milera/adams > beams/SJ/chapman
2 of shiel/mcdonald/d.smith/magner > JPK/Swan
1 of delaney/ellis/darley > waters/MJ
How do I go about this CS?
With injuries to Swan and Pendles is Marley Williams an alternative at a very cheap price ($94,600) to make some cash if named this week which I suspect he would be given Pies are playing Melbourne. Has a huge negative B/e as well.
Quote from: Ringo on June 05, 2012, 09:30:09 AM
With injuries to Swan and Pendles is Marley Williams an alternative at a very cheap price ($94,600) to make some cash if named this week which I suspect he would be given Pies are playing Melbourne. Has a huge negative B/e as well.
yeag good point Ringo! 94k very tempting. How is his long-term JS?
Would not touch Marley
Team im planning to have going into finals:
goddard deledio shaw broughton scotland WATERS malceski <ellis darley>
ablett pendles selwood boyd THOMPSON SWAN <shiel magner>
giles sandi <orren redden>
franklin sidearse zaha danger martin CHAPPY zorko <treloar milera>
Obviously rooks will change...what's best way to achieve this roughly?
Thanks :)
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,61423.0.html
Howdy charliesheen and others :D
Was a disastround for me but I knew it was coming! Only 1125 for me this week, lets never speak of it again, and move on thanks! To make it worse, i dropped my league game and slipped to 2nd by '%', still game clear of 3rd.
Ive got some major decisions regarding injuries to Sandi, Zaha, Scotland...hopefully shaw & pendles are back soon
But what to do???
12 trades...5.5k...going for league(2)
B: goddard deledio scotland broughton shaw malceski delaney <ellis darley>
M: ablett pendlebury boyd selwood shiel mcdonald <d.smith magner>
R: sandilands giles <redden stephenson>
F: franklin sidebottom dangerfield zaharakis martin zorko treloar <milera adams>
thinking ellis > s.shaw, sandi > prem ruck
not sure whether to keep zaha
seriously thinking taking a risk and doing this:
ellis > s.shaw
magner > priddis
sandi > jolly
yes darren jolly, thoughts? :)
Jolly with a bye this week so you can hold that trade if need be.
Tank R12. Best premiums are R12 full stop.
IMO, forget priddis just bring in the R12 players you want.
Sandi > Naitanui
Magner > Gibson
Zaha > D.Swan/Chappy/SJ/JPK/Beams/etc..
Thanks guys! Made my mind up im not relying on Jolly as no.1 ruck for rest of season, so there goes that idea!
What about this?
this week:•ellis > s.shaw
•rook not named > gibson
•magner > priddis
next week:•sandi > ryder/NicNat or other prem.ruck depending on $$$
Thoughts?
-------------------------------
Quote from: charliesheen on June 13, 2012, 10:36:18 PM
Tank R12. Best premiums are R12 full stop.
IMO, forget priddis just bring in the R12 players you want.
Sandi > Naitanui
Magner > Gibson
Zaha > D.Swan/Chappy/SJ/JPK/Beams/etc..
cheers CS, good to have you back :)
I like those trades, but i am deadset keeping zaha!
imo, would only take priddis if your trade situation is bad. way way better options, especially for leagues. remember the pies have melbourne in R21 finals, where we saw beams, sidebottom, swan all get 150's.
zaharackis could be out for potentially 6 weeks, you cant afford to keep him.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 13, 2012, 11:11:42 PM
imo, would only take priddis if your trade situation is bad. way way better options, especially for leagues. remember the pies have melbourne in R21 finals, where we saw beams, sidebottom, swan all get 150's.
zaharackis could be out for potentially 6 weeks, you cant afford to keep him.
i think i
need priddis due to my trade situation...i have still have 4 upgrades to do (a D6, M5, M6, F6) + a few downgrades to that and that will leave me with ?4? trades come finals *fingers crossed
i have to start making some compromises e.g. priddis & cloke bring in over next two weeks....
gotta quote here from fever on a PT thread...
"zaha, it was a 4-6wk injury, right? i would 100% be holding him. you have bench cover, mpp flexibility and are comfortable in your league. no brainer hold."
think this is what I will do:
this week
ellis > s.shaw (if named)
rookie(surely 1 wont be named) > gibson (if named)
magner > priddis
next week
rookie > cloke
sandi > prem. ruck (depends on who I trade to cloke, all about the $â,¬â,¬
this leaves me with 7 trades and 2 more positions to upgrade
teams are out! like always, plans have changed:
this week:
TONIGHT
magner > gibson
mcdonald > priddis
TOMORROW
ellis > s.shaw (dont want there to be any late changes as not reverse trades during partial lockout)
next week:
sandi > NicNat
milera > cloke
THOUGHTS??
R12 Score: 1950
League position: 1
Had a very good win, which has seen me go back to top of my league
The trades completed last week were: delaney, magner & mcdonald > shaw, gibson & priddis...really payed off :)
9 trades...162.9k...going for league(1)
B: goddard deledio scotland broughton h:shaw malceski s.shaw <ellis darley>
M: ablett pendlebury boyd selwood priddis shiel <d.smith gibson>
R: sandilands giles <redden stephenson>
F: franklin sidebottom dangerfield zaharakis martin zorko treloar <milera adams>
Got plently of cash to splash...sandi needs to go, ryder and NicNat look like prime targets......would also like to bring in Trav. Cloke this week, for milera or d.smith maybe???
Thinking d.smith > cloke
then there's the sandi issue :(
wow thanks for the help guys :(
May as well just lock in trades now...sandi > NicNat/Ryder, milera > patton, d.smith > beams
last chance if someone wants to help...please! Charliesheen, where r u mate? :(
Sandilands > T.Campbell
Grab Swan and a premium forward like Chappy/Goodes, or Cloke (if you feel your low on trades)
Pick up Mumford for Orren later when he is bottomed out, if you really want to gamble :)
Quote from: charliesheen on June 20, 2012, 07:11:51 PM
Sandilands > T.Campbell
Grab Swan and a premium forward like Chappy/Goodes, or Cloke (if you feel your low on trades)
Pick up Mumford for Orren later when he is bottomed out, if you really want to gamble :)
CHARLIESHEEN!!!! missed ya bud :D
tom campbell o.O dont know much about him, would free up a heap of cash tho! leaves me with rucks of giles & redden/orren/campbell (until i upgrade one, to a bottomed out ruck e.g. mummy as you suggested)
yeah i NEED swanny! would be nice to finish off the mids :D
so do i trade miliera & one of d.smith/treloar (depending on teams) > swan & beams (prefer him to options suggested, but goodes could be a nice POD ???
if you don't really care about win, just trade whoever has the highest BE.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 20, 2012, 07:35:36 PM
if you don't really care about win, just trade whoever has the highest BE.
well, this weeks league game is as good as won
treloar has the higher BE, over 100 if i remember correctly, but this is his first bad game and has shown he can score keeper worthy (had an average of 81 up until last week) him and zorko could be a great M7/F7 combo!
i dont have the same optimisim for d.smith.....would much rather trade him out, but I would gain less $$$
its up to you. Milera might be worth keeping, has pretty awesome JS, but R13 bye.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 20, 2012, 07:42:42 PM
its up to you. Milera might be worth keeping, has pretty awesome JS, but R13 bye.
yeah great js for milera....never know when he might come in handy 8) as i said, not worried about R13, got it won, the bloke im playing is tanking this round!
comes down toReasons to trade Treloar - is very pricey, will bleed $$$ for a couple of weeks
Reasons to keep Treloar - has scored well consistently
Reasons to trade D.Smith - isnt as gooder (is that a word?) scorer as Treloar
Reasons to keep D.Smith - shouldnt drop too much in price
Reasons to trade Milera - has peaked in price, isnt a high scorer
Reasons to keep Milera - great job security
so trades for this week Charliesheen: sandi & two of milera, d.smith & treloar > campbell, swan, goodes
future trades: orren > mumford (or other bottomed out ruck)
would leave team as something like this:
5 trades
B: goddard deledio scotland broughton h.shaw malceski s.shaw <ellis darley>
M: ablett pendlebury boyd selwood priddis
swan <shiel gibson>
R:
mumford giles <redden
campbell>
F: franklin sidebottom dangerfield zaharakis martin
goodes zorko<milera adams>
thoughts? keep in mind, i would like 3-4 trades for finals
just mess around with stuff.
If you pick up cheaper guys like Josh Kennedy, Cloke, etc could mean you can finish your back line better
Quote from: charliesheen on June 20, 2012, 08:39:18 PM
just mess around with stuff.
If you pick up cheaper guys like Josh Kennedy, Cloke, etc could mean you can finish your back line better
yeah good point! I think I need swan! not gonna take shortcuts with mids.....im seriously considering cloke tho! but is cloke a good enough F6? As im keeping zorks as F7?
Well you need to look @ things as a whole. Equation could comes down to
Cloke & Carrots
vs
Goodes & Rookie
Cloke as North Melbourne in R21, could absolutely smash them. I dunno you have to look at your bank yourself its too hard for me.
the rooke, what position???? Also who would I trade to Carrots? Hard to do the maths if not sure on key points...
dont wanna sound too cocky...but there is a decent chance, ill have a week off in R21...making Cloke's score useless...dont wanna get too far ahead of myself though :D
Hey J, G'day,
How about
OUT go Sandi Treloar and Milera
IN come NicNat (Ryder) Beams and Crozier / Couch.
All depends upon selections of course, but you get 2 keepers in for 1 out.
Leaves you just 5 trades but then only need Swan when he drops a bit, one def upgrade, say Birchall and maybe one fwd if you don't like Zorko as F7.
Food for thought.
Quote from: tor01doc on June 20, 2012, 09:32:16 PM
Hey J, G'day,
How about
OUT go Sandi Treloar and Milera
IN come NicNat (Ryder) Beams and Crozier / Couch.
All depends upon selections of course, but you get 2 keepers in for 1 out.
Leaves you just 5 trades but then only need Swan when he drops a bit, one def upgrade, say Birchall and maybe one fwd if you don't like Zorko as F7.
Food for thought.
GoodDay to you as well Doc 8)
I like that as well! Little less risky than CS's idea as well, gotta risk it to get that biscuit tho ;)
like many, im not sold on either crozier or couch! patton has best js of all but too expensive, morabito will be a nice downgrade in the mids soon, might wait till he presents himself...also i believe 3 trades leaves me with 6 trades not 5!
That extra trade is part of my bill! ;)
also...thoughts on shiel and eski? shiel is getting near his peak (be of 55) and if I get swn, dont want him just sitting on bench! Also with ellis/darley/s.shaw doing well...could I get away with playing one of those a week as a D7...if that's the case, then I could trade eski???
If i trade treloar > swan...then I would lose DPP which I need to help cover Zaha!
Quote from: tor01doc on June 20, 2012, 09:49:34 PM
That extra trade is part of my bill! ;)
haha! well Doc's always do overcharge
Shiel worth hanging onto for a week or two in terms of $ and hopefully gets a game.
Suspect Treloar will be generally sore. Might start using that diagnosis as a matter of fact!
High BE for Hargrave and Eski - maybe time to go for one.
Swan would be a great C this week with Ablett, Pendles and Ledger out.
Quote from: tor01doc on June 20, 2012, 09:54:22 PM
Shiel worth hanging onto for a week or two in terms of $ and hopefully gets a game.
Suspect Treloar will be generally sore. Might start using that diagnosis as a matter of fact!
High BE for Hargrave and Eski - maybe time to go for one.
Swan would be a great C this week with Ablett, Pendles and Ledger out.
wait what??? 1. i dont have hargrave and 2. what the flower has ledger got to do with captaincy!? haha your a strange doctor ;)
okay ill keep shiel and bite the bullet (the losing DPP bullet)
tossing up between these trades:
sandi, treloar and milera > campbell, cloke, swan (150k in the bank)
VS
sandi, treloar and milera > NicNat, Beams(Goodes), Patton
im liking this idea! sandi, treloar and milera > campbell, cloke, swan (150k in the bank)
then orren/redden > mumford once bottomed out
then all I need is carrots in the backs and im done :) this can be achieved my a shiel > morabito trade in a couple of rounds
Got balls to take back mumford 8)
He did finish last year really strongly after coming back from injury
Quote from: charliesheen on June 20, 2012, 10:50:29 PM
Got balls to take back mumford 8)
He did finish last year really strongly after coming back from injury
well 500k with a BE of 191...will be a bargain once he gets some fitness back :)
would you go with goodes or cloke?
If the $$$ does not make a difference to your future upgrades, Goodes/Chapman.
I would be very keen on loading up on Sydney, Kennedy/Goodes/Mumford. They are going to finish strong.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 20, 2012, 10:54:36 PM
If the $$$ does not make a difference, Goodes/Chapman.
would prefer goodes over chappy i think! goodes always finishes strong and an excellent POD
im not sure if $$$ does make a difference, will depend on how I want to finish my backs...just thinking that with Zorks staying as my F7, cloke might no be good enough for F6, F7 yeah good pick, but need a decent 6th forward I think with Zaha injured and Dusty Martin being Dusty Martin
You gotta manage your own budget :)
Quote from: charliesheen on June 20, 2012, 11:02:05 PM
You gotta manage your own budget :)
wise words...
thinking ill take Goodes F6 and F7 of cloke and zorko doesnt appeal to me
Ill deal with backs when I get there...but id like Carrots as D6...dont know whethe to flick eski and play shaw as D7 or flick one of darley/ellis/shaw and keep eski o.O
Quote from: Jayman on June 04, 2012, 11:30:52 PM
Quote from: charliesheen on June 04, 2012, 09:04:38 PM
Can post team your up against?
mate. Does it really matter? Im probly gonna losr, but i'll still be on top by percentage, whether I trade or not, ill be top...and its getting to the stagw where trades are vital! Just keep my situation in mind when opinionating CS! Anyway here is HIS team....remember HIS not mine:
B: deledio goddard clarke shaw grimes hargrave dempsey ellis darley
M: stanton pendlebury ablett dal-santo priddis d.smith horsley neale
R: natanui sandilands jenkins stephenson
F: franklin dangerfield sidebottom pavlich whitecross porplyzia pfeiffer zorko hall
That's why I thought you had Hargrave.
Attention to detail never been my long suit.
OK forget everything I have said about your team and I will be back tomorrow with some relevant suggestions.
In the meantime, do not get Cloke.
Quote from: tor01doc on June 21, 2012, 01:21:08 AM
Quote from: Jayman on June 04, 2012, 11:30:52 PM
Quote from: charliesheen on June 04, 2012, 09:04:38 PM
Can post team your up against?
mate. Does it really matter? Im probly gonna losr, but i'll still be on top by percentage, whether I trade or not, ill be top...and its getting to the stagw where trades are vital! Just keep my situation in mind when opinionating CS! Anyway here is HIS team....remember HIS not mine:
B: deledio goddard clarke shaw grimes hargrave dempsey ellis darley
M: stanton pendlebury ablett dal-santo priddis d.smith horsley neale
R: natanui sandilands jenkins stephenson
F: franklin dangerfield sidebottom pavlich whitecross porplyzia pfeiffer zorko hall
That's why I thought you had Hargrave.
Attention to detail never been my long suit.
OK forget everything I have said about your team and I will be back tomorrow with some relevant suggestions.
In the meantime, do not get Cloke.
hahahaha!nah that's my opponents team from a couple of weeks ago :D look forward to the relevant suggestions Doc ;)
for anyone else that ia confused, here is my team:
9 trades...162.9k...going for league(1)
B: goddard deledio scotland broughton h:shaw malceski s.shaw <ellis darley>
M: ablett pendlebury boyd selwood priddis shiel <d.smith gibson>
R: sandilands giles <redden stephenson>
F: franklin sidebottom dangerfield zaharakis martin zorko treloar <milera adams>
my trade plan atm (all depends on what tor01doc supplies later on today as to whether ill change it):
this weeksandilands > campbell
treloar > swan
milera > cloke
when mumford has bottomed outredden/orren > mumford
when morabito is on the bubbleshiel > morabito
when carrats has bottomed outmalceski/s.shaw/darley/ellis > carrazzo
THOUGHTS ???
So. This is where we disagree.
I would be getting a decent ruckman. NicNat or Ryder. Done deal for the rest of the year. A nice feeling that.
Cloke - you like. OK then, how about getting rid of Donuts Zaha and Milera this week.
So out go Sandi Zaha and Milera - 3 donuts and 1 1/2 LTI's
In - NicNat and Cloke (I'd prefer Chapman or Goodes) and have about $348000 left for a rookie and set up for next week.
Just a thought.
If deadset on keeping Zaha then Treloar goes giving you less scope to get a decent ruck but then you like Campbell. Has he even been selected?
I would never start with Mumford, but I would definitely consider finishing with him when he has bottomed out.
You saw how he finished 2011 coming back from injury with a huge bang. If you have been following Sydney you know they are hitting some form and there is still Goodes coming back.
Risk vs Reward. I took a gamble on Giles>Goldstein 3 weeks ago, and it put me in the top 100. I think Mumford has the same potential, and <500K going to be hard to pass up.
Quote from: tor01doc on June 21, 2012, 10:16:43 AM
So. This is where we disagree.
I would be getting a decent ruckman. NicNat or Ryder. Done deal for the rest of the year. A nice feeling that.
Cloke - you like. OK then, how about getting rid of Donuts Zaha and Milera this week.
So out go Sandi Zaha and Milera - 3 donuts and 1 1/2 LTI's
In - NicNat and Cloke (I'd prefer Chapman or Goodes) and have about $348000 left for a rookie and set up for next week.
Just a thought.
If deadset on keeping Zaha then Treloar goes giving you less scope to get a decent ruck but then you like Campbell. Has he even been selected?
thanks Doc :) good to have some contrasting opinions!
Well first off I have a super easy league game this week this bloke is tanking R13 so my team will tear his a new one! So my donuts this week dont really matter, if this changes your trade idea, let me know!
I do agree with you, getting NicNat or Ryder would be great. You dont think Mumford & Giles will be good enough?
I do think Cloke is a bargain at <400k. He has still cracked the ton quite a few times this year and has a 30 BE i think. No doubt goodes/chappy are better, but gotta factor in $$$ here!
I think I can keep zaha. only 2-4 weeks away and this week is easy so only 1-3 away approx. mpp is handy and wil be a good POD
Any other suggestions doc? Appreciate it :)
Quote from: charliesheen on June 21, 2012, 12:32:09 PM
I would never start with Mumford, but I would definitely consider finishing with him when he has bottomed out.
You saw how he finished 2011 coming back from injury with a huge bang. If you have been following Sydney you know they are hitting some form and there is still Goodes coming back.
Risk vs Reward. I took a gamble on Giles>Goldstein 3 weeks ago, and it put me in the top 100. I think Mumford has the same potential, and <500K going to be hard to pass up.
Top 100! Wow well done charlie...hope you win the 50k :D
I made the mistake of starting with Mummy & the 3-rook combo :(
Hopefully regains some form along with his fitness....do you like my trade plan CS?
Now just wait for teams!
2011 Mumford R1-9 - 108 SC
2011 Mumford R16-24 - 122 SC
So coming back from a ~7 week lay off last year. Sydney looking on the up.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 21, 2012, 05:41:36 PM
2011 Mumford R1-9 - 108 SC
2011 Mumford R16-24 - 122 SC
So coming back from a ~7 week lay off last year. Sydney looking on the up.
ok im convinced...just hope i can affird him as well as carrots
In that case just get Cloke if you must.
Treloar out Cloke in.
The others are still rising and Swan may well drop more than they rise and you don't need him this week.
Sandi, Milera won't drop and you get an extra week's insurance on Swan if you wait.
Quote from: tor01doc on June 21, 2012, 06:24:00 PM
In that case just get Cloke if you must.
Treloar out Cloke in.
The others are still rising and Swan may well drop more than they rise and you don't need him this week.
Sandi, Milera won't drop and you get an extra week's insurance on Swan if you wait.
ok treloar out cloke in
i guess your right...no point doing other trades, get to have a look at campbell and ya never know, swan may get injured!
What do ya think charlie?
Just treloar > cloke
I think its silly not to take the mid upgrade this week.
What if someone else gets injured/suspended next week, it delays your entire upgrade process. Swan is a good captain choice this week.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 21, 2012, 07:17:16 PM
I think its silly not to take the mid upgrade this week.
What if someone else gets injured/suspended next week, it delays your entire upgrade process. Swan is a good captain choice this week.
yeah alright. Now you put it that way :)
So:
Sandi > Campbell
Treloar > Cloke
Milera > Swan
Lets see who is named first. Maybe keeping Treloar a good thing to maintain MPP.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 21, 2012, 07:24:13 PM
Lets see who is named first. Maybe keeping Treloar a good thing to maintain MPP.
yes that's what ive been pondering. Mpp would be handy in order to cover zaha
could trade shiel?
I would get someone in for Eski now.
Swan can wait.
Why Campbell - how many games will he get?
No Couch - ouch
Malceski!!!!! Wow what a dud
argh what now?
Waters?
Johnson?
Quote from: tor01doc on June 21, 2012, 08:03:19 PM
Waters?
Johnson?
johnson, safer and cheaper option. Waters is a better scorer though.
So eski > prem. then what other trade(s)
Sandilands > Campbell
Malceski > MJ
Rookie > mid premium of your choice
Quote from: charliesheen on June 22, 2012, 12:38:36 AM
Sandilands > Campbell
Malceski > MJ
Rookie > mid premium of your choice
yep confirms what I was thinking...thanks charlie!
The last trade will be treloar > swan I think! Will double check funds :)
Wait wait wait..
Wouldnt it he smarter to get cloke in this week due to his low BE and wait a week on swan?
Can you still afford Swan week after through Shiel?
Quote from: charliesheen on June 22, 2012, 01:04:00 AM
Can you still afford Swan week after through Shiel?
Doing the rough math, yes I should be able to...will double check later on today o.O
so ill wait for final teams but:
sandi > campbell
eski > MJohnson
treloar > swan OR treloar > cloke
tough choice ???
Top 4 in all your leagues?
Cloke probably maximizes money more, but who knows Swan could go big.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 22, 2012, 12:47:32 PM
Top 4 in all your leagues?
Cloke probably maximizes money more, but who knows Swan could go big.
im top 4 in the ones that matter :)
Just maximizes $$$ I am sure 1 game without Swan won't hurt. I think LOL
Quote from: charliesheen on June 22, 2012, 01:27:07 PM
Just maximizes $$$ I am sure 1 game without Swan won't hurt. I think LOL
ok sounds good. locked in :)
giving Boyd the big 'C'
If your heart is set on Cloke (talking about no heart), then jump on this week.
Swan won't rise by nearly as much as Cloke.
Good luck.
Quote from: tor01doc on June 22, 2012, 04:34:59 PM
If your heart is set on Cloke (talking about no heart), then jump on this week.
Swan won't rise by nearly as much as Cloke.
Good luck.
well i wouldnt say my heart is set on cloke, just think he is better value for money than other options and saving the cash will help later on! im open to other suggestions tho :)
IMO, this year you need to look for value. It's going to be very hard to get the best players in each position unless you have been very lucky with injuries.
Score: 1415
League ranking: 1
343.6k 6trades
goddard deledio shaw broughtom scotland johnson s.shaw <darley ellis>
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd priddis shiel <gibson dsmith>
giles campbell <redden orren>
franklin sidebottom danger zaha cloke martin zorko <adams milera>
shiel > swan is an obviou trade. should i stop there¿
ok shiel> swan done. still got 106k left but now with only the 5 trades. Thoughts?
Quote from: Jayman on June 26, 2012, 08:31:03 PM
ok shiel> swan done. still got 106k left but now with only the 5 trades. Thoughts?
scratch that idea!
redden > griffin & shiel > scottyT
Quote from: Jayman on June 27, 2012, 06:35:52 PM
Quote from: Jayman on June 26, 2012, 08:31:03 PM
ok shiel> swan done. still got 106k left but now with only the 5 trades. Thoughts?
scratch that idea!
redden > griffin & shiel > scottyT
That gives you a gun mid and a second playing ruck. Very nice.
Griffin concerns me from a league final's context. For overall, its a different matter.
I like S.Thompson though, Brisbane, Melbourne, GCS last 3 rounds.
Quote from: charliesheen on June 27, 2012, 10:05:07 PM
Griffin concerns me from a league final's context. For overall, its a different matter.
that's my only concern...how will he perform in R20, 21, 22, 23...
i could get ryder then trade in S.Black or Montagna in for Shiel....Also i could trade in Mumford then shiel > bartel... Thoughts?
Can't ya take Mummy & Thompson?
Quote from: charliesheen on June 27, 2012, 11:14:43 PM
Can't ya take Mummy & Thompson?
nope. Mummy & NDS could work...Roughy & Judd is another good combo IMO
And dont forget, I could just do redden > jacobs then wait for say NDS to fall into the high 400 - low 500 price bracket.
redden > mumford & shiel > NDS
Thoughts?
How freaked out are you by having 6 trades left?? Because, even though i said yesterday to risk it for the biscuit and go Mummy and NDS, if you wanted to, you could always this week go Devon Smith >> Tom Couch (or someone at 94k with dpp who may play in the future) and then go Redden to Mumford. This would leave you enough money to get any mid in the comp next week if you trade out Shiel. The only thing is it would leave 3 trades, and you've probably still got to make at least 2 upgrades. But personally, i think the likes of Ellis/Spur/Darley are good enough to ride out as D7 at least till finals, and the same with Zorko as F7.
How much better would your midfield look with:
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd priddis jobe.
as apposed to:
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd priddis NDS.
Just my thoughts.
Quote from: Braddles10 on June 28, 2012, 10:54:23 AM
How freaked out are you by having 6 trades left?? Because, even though i said yesterday to risk it for the biscuit and go Mummy and NDS, if you wanted to, you could always this week go Devon Smith >> Tom Couch (or someone at 94k with dpp who may play in the future) and then go Redden to Mumford. This would leave you enough money to get any mid in the comp next week if you trade out Shiel. The only thing is it would leave 3 trades, and you've probably still got to make at least 2 upgrades. But personally, i think the likes of Ellis/Spur/Darley are good enough to ride out as D7 at least till finals, and the same with Zorko as F7.
How much better would your midfield look with:
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd priddis jobe.
as apposed to:
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd priddis NDS.
Just my thoughts.
thanks mate! actually a bit freaked out about having 6 trades (4 after this week)...tthrrefore i think ill hold the EllisDarleyShaw combo as D7 until finals anyway! so i only need another ruck & fwd...personally Mumford & NDS is the best combo
Yeah I agree, if that's the case, go for it, I reckon Mummy will start to fire sooner rather than later, considering jumping on myself!
cmon charliesheen pipe up mate ;)
redden & shiel > mumford & nds
lock it in?
OKAY GUYS, HELP NEEDED...WHAT COMBO?
mumford & nds
roughead & judd
just jacobs, and wait for prem. mid to drop
Just Jacobs for me if that is the trade you want and wait for prem drop.
Quote from: Ringo on June 29, 2012, 08:31:14 PM
Just Jacobs for me if that is the trade you want and wait for prem drop.
my only concern with that is shiel dropping as well??? He has a BE of 100 so will drop this week.
would be a disaster if i have to do another downgrade in order to gain so little
that's why im leaning towards doing the trade while I can (mumford & NDS)
Went with redden & shiel > mumford & nds!
Yes it's risky but i was so unsure in the end, so i went with my gut! Fingers crossed :)
Already got next week's trade sorted...s.shaw/darley/ellis > yarran
This would give me 3 trades and a completed team! Yarran is a great D7 imo...at 257k with a BE of 25...straight swap for a rookie 8)
Score: 2101
League ranking: 1
I'm now a game clear, top of my league, due to equal first suffering a loss...last weeks trades were redden & shiel OUT > mumford & nds IN...im happy with mummy, looked good on saturday...picked nds in the wrong week tho :-\
team at full strength
3k. 4trades. League(1)
Goddard deledio shaw broughton johnson scotland shaw <ellis darley>
Ablett pendles boy selwood priddis dal-santo <gibson dsmith>
Mumford giles <campbell orren>
Buddy sidebottom dangerfield martin cloke zaharakis zorko <milera adams>
Obviously a D7 is necessary hence this weeks trade plans...ellis > yarran!?!? Yarran could average 90-odd for rest of year, more than enough for a D7, and being a straight swap for a rookie...im in :D
Thoughts on ellis > yarran?
I'd say do it. Yarran at that price is tempting. He is high risk vs high reward but if he plays like he did on Friday then it will be a masterstroke!
Zaha still a few weeks away is worrying.
Quote from: roo boys! on July 03, 2012, 11:52:15 AM
I'd say do it. Yarran at that price is tempting. He is high risk vs high reward but if he plays like he did on Friday then it will be a masterstroke!
yes im leaning towards doing it! As you said, could be a masterstroke! Fingers crossed :)
Quote from: roo boys! on July 03, 2012, 11:52:15 AM
Zaha still a few weeks away is worrying.
yes it is worrying :-\ hopefully comes back better than ever and is a good POD
Any further thoughts? Ringo? Charlieshen?
Say if you went
Zaha > Sylvia can you afford Ellis > Carrots?
Quote from: charliesheen on July 06, 2012, 01:06:28 PM
Say if you went
Zaha > Sylvia can you afford Ellis > Carrots?
nah doesnt work mate...best I could get would be chaplin, rance, suckling
dont think i can hold zaha? im a game clear 1st so ill make top 4...willl zaha be back for round 20??? that's the question
Zaha is fecked, no guarantees he is even going to score well even if he comes back.
Quote from: charliesheen on July 06, 2012, 02:29:22 PM
Zaha is fecked, no guarantees he is even going to score well even if he comes back.
grrrrrrr
so if went ellis > yarran (will complete my team)
i could trade zaha > pav/roughy
???
It's going to be a 50/50 call, like the Pendlebury one. Looking at Yaz's stats his been sub so many times, not sure if this is a good or bad thing LOL.
Quote from: charliesheen on July 06, 2012, 02:45:30 PM
It's going to be a 50/50 call, like the Pendlebury one. Looking at Yaz's stats his been sub so many times, not sure if this is a good or bad thing LOL.
50/50 call as to whether to trade zaha? or who to trade in for zaha?
haha yeah Yaz has been sub affected heaps...most of those were through injury troubles correct? this has skewed his average obviously...he sees fit and ready to go now, so shouldnt be sub ::)
Both.
The person you trade in is just as important as whether you trade them out. LOL colin sylvia and yaz we are getting desperate :D
I actually think Sylvia/Suckling is worth the punt in your situation but could feck up :D
R21 finals
Melbourne vs GWS (hello sylvia)
Hawthorn vs GCFC (hello suckling)
Thats assuming Sylvia does not get busted for sleeping in or drinking :D
Quote from: charliesheen on July 06, 2012, 02:50:32 PM
Both.
The person you trade in is just as important as whether you trade them out. LOL colin sylvia and yaz we are getting desperate :D
I actually think Sylvia/Suckling is worth the punt in your situation but could feck up :D
ah okay
but you say zaha is flowered so then trading him out isnt really a 50/50 call is it :o
it could be worth a punt, but surely yarran will average similar to roughy BUT pav/roughy should outscore sylvia comfortablet, correct?
Quote from: charliesheen on July 06, 2012, 02:52:43 PM
R21 finals
Melbourne vs GWS (hello sylvia)
Hawthorn vs GCFC (hello suckling)
Thats assuming Sylvia does not get busted for sleeping in or drinking :D
hmmmm now that is tempting ;D R21 i may have the week off depending if i win in R20 ???
Isn't finals R21, R22, R23?
or is it R20 first?
Quote from: charliesheen on July 06, 2012, 03:16:46 PM
Isn't finals R21, R22, R23?
or is it R20 first?
20, 21, 22, 23....last 4 rounds of season
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,64195.0.html
:) (hold zaha) ellis > yarran
:) (keep s.shaw as D7 for now ) zaha > roughy/pav/robbo/bennell/lewis/rok/goodes
:) (double trade) ellis > yarran & zaha > roughy/pav/robbo/bennell/lewis/rok/goodes
:) (double trade) ellis > suckling/fisher/newman/hibberd & zaha > sylvia
:) (save cash) ellis > yarran & zaha > sylvia
:) dont trade
So theyre my options (excuse my dot points)! Please help :)
Zaha to Roughhead will give you additional Ruck coverage with only one trade required which will help in your situation and is good enough for f6/7 in your team
Quote from: Ringo on July 06, 2012, 06:12:43 PM
Zaha to Roughhead will give you additional Ruck coverage with only one trade required which will help in your situation and is good enough for f6/7 in your team
pass on yarran?
If your comfortable with 2 trades then do but I would sit on three,
just went zaha > roughy in the end
A good win in my league. Keeps me clear by a game & now up to 2nd by total points. Very happy with bringing in Roughy for Zaha last week! Also happy i didnt make the ellis > yarran trade, as s.shaw scored 98, which is d7 worthy!
Obviously i have to hold till finals now but here is my team:
10.5k. 3trades. Going for league(1)
goddard deledio scotland mjohnson broughton h.shaw s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd dal-santo priddis <gibson d.smith>
mumford giles <campbell orren>
franklin sidebottom dangerfield roughead martin cloke zorko <milera adams>
If you can hold off on trades until finals and finish top 4, you can grab yourself someone like Birchall/Carrazzo who is way better.
Quote from: charliesheen on July 09, 2012, 08:48:03 PM
If you can hold off on trades until finals and finish top 4, you can grab yourself someone like Birchall/Carrazzo who is way better.
Yeah that's the plan CS
Hopefully ill be able to get another decent ruck aswell!
Darley, Campbell & Adams starting. Thanks a lot Goddard, Giles & Buddy >:(
Not Buddy's fault! Someone needs to pay for that though.
Martin - suits Collingwood more than Rrrichmond. Neck tattoos indeed!
Giles - be grateful for he has served us well.
Looking to finals now.
I hate the taste of donuts! Campbell/Giles/Orren as R2 isnt gonna cut it...not sure what I can do to fix with only 3 trades
Roughead to R2.
Also remember you still have a couple of cash cows making money.
Will help your upgrade up front when time comes.
Just got the win! Going into the last game, it was Munford + 16 VS Goodes! Lucky for me, Goodes didnt fire
But scoring wise, it was a terrible round for me. Broughton, MJ, NDS, Cloke were as shower as ever.
This week I finally have a full-strength team. With Goddard & Martin returning
3trades. 10.5k. 1st in league
goddard deledio scotland mjohnson broughton h.shaw s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd dal-santo priddis <gibson d.smith>
mumford giles <campbell orren>
franklin sidebottom dangerfield roughead martin cloke zorko <milera adams>
i like to think I have a finished team, but with s.shaw & giles on field; is it?
Looks fine to me. Just upgrade the weak link in finals whoever that may be.
the SC gods have gifted me with having to start ellis, darley and milera this week. Thankfully no donuts, unless milera doesnt make the final cut :(
i doubt any trades need to be done this week unless Doc. has any grand plans?
Quote from: tor01doc on July 15, 2012, 10:50:41 AM
Roughead to R2.
Also remember you still have a couple of cash cows making money.
Will help your upgrade up front when time comes.
a captain decision still has to be made, and it is a rather important league game...vsing 4th on the ladder, and if I lose i drop back to 2nd place
I average 113 more points than him but he has something ridiculous like 10 trades left, so he is building some good form.
Thoughts? :)
Sitting first in league affords you the luxury of NO
TRADES this week.
Just sit and from the info you have provided you should still win without trading.
Trades will be gold in finals.
Backs still one short I think.
Carrots, Waters ( not this week though as seems a ridiculously short recovery), or Birchall at some stage.
Sitting pretty by the looks of it.
Copping 2 donuts this week, with milera and darley both not named. Less confident I can get the victory now
Any ideas?
Sit boy. Sit.
Those trades will be worth a lot more come finals time.
Quote from: tor01doc on July 20, 2012, 07:00:21 PM
Sit boy. Sit.
Those trades will be worth a lot more come finals time.
haha you make me laugh Doc. But yes i will 'sit' :D
There's a good boy. :)
Score: 2007
League Ranking: 2
10.5k. 3trades. Going for league(1)
goddard deledio scotland mjohnson broughton h.shaw s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd dal-santo priddis <gibson d.smith>
mumford giles <campbell orren>
franklin sidebottom dangerfield roughead martin cloke zorko <milera adams>
copped a 360 point loss, not happy... :(
Quote from: tor01doc on June 21, 2012, 01:21:08 AM
Quote from: Jayman on June 04, 2012, 11:30:52 PM
Quote from: charliesheen on June 04, 2012, 09:04:38 PM
Can post team your up against?
mate. Does it really matter? Im probly gonna losr, but i'll still be on top by percentage, whether I trade or not, ill be top...and its getting to the stagw where trades are vital! Just keep my situation in mind when opinionating CS! Anyway here is HIS team....remember HIS not mine:
B: deledio goddard clarke shaw grimes hargrave dempsey ellis darley
M: stanton pendlebury ablett dal-santo priddis d.smith horsley neale
R: natanui sandilands jenkins stephenson
F: franklin dangerfield sidebottom pavlich whitecross porplyzia pfeiffer zorko hall
That's why I thought you had Hargrave.
Attention to detail never been my long suit.
OK forget everything I have said about your team and I will be back tomorrow with some relevant suggestions.
In the meantime, do not get Cloke.
Did you get Cloke? Madman.
Yeah u were right Doc! :)
...for once this year! :(
Thinking of just doing a darley > baguley trade
Or cop a donut unless you think DArley won't play again.
Baguley's JS is iffy once the injured players come back.
Quote from: Jayman on July 23, 2012, 12:58:05 AM
Score: 2007
League Ranking: 2
10.5k. 3trades. Going for league(1)
goddard deledio scotland mjohnson broughton h.shaw s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd dal-santo priddis <gibson d.smith>
mumford giles <campbell orren>
franklin sidebottom dangerfield roughead martin cloke zorko <milera adams>
copped a 360 point loss, not happy... :(
tbh mate i think you've gotta write this week off. there's no way to plug all ur 0s, and if you try you just leave yourself vulnerable for the rest of the year. you'll make the finals so i say hold.
ideally what your remaining trades will be used for:
1. giles>staley this week (ur gonna lose anyway, but giles will probably shed another 20-30k if he puts out another 50 this week), roughy dpp into ruck (bank remaining ~270k).
barring injury/susp next week do not trade.
week leading into finals:
2. ellis/broughton (depending if broughton is back playing)>best defender ~450k (hopefully waters)
1. adams> fyfe
then pray for cloke and mummy and strap yourself in.
gl
Quote from: fever on July 27, 2012, 11:11:26 AM
Quote from: Jayman on July 23, 2012, 12:58:05 AM
Score: 2007
League Ranking: 2
10.5k. 3trades. Going for league(1)
goddard deledio scotland mjohnson broughton h.shaw s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd dal-santo priddis <gibson d.smith>
mumford giles <campbell orren>
franklin sidebottom dangerfield roughead martin cloke zorko <milera adams>
copped a 360 point loss, not happy... :(
tbh mate i think you've gotta write this week off. there's no way to plug all ur 0s, and if you try you just leave yourself vulnerable for the rest of the year. you'll make the finals so i say hold.
ideally what your remaining trades will be used for:
1. giles>staley this week (ur gonna lose anyway, but giles will probably shed another 20-30k if he puts out another 50 this week), roughy dpp into ruck (bank remaining ~270k).
barring injury/susp next week do not trade.
week leading into finals:
2. ellis/broughton (depending if broughton is back playing)>best defender ~450k (hopefully waters)
1. adams> fyfe
then pray for cloke and mummy and strap yourself in.
gl
thanks very much fever, appreciate the reply :D
some good thoughts there. Giles > Staley trade seems good but remember that i dont need to trade in a fwd/ruc rookie in order to get Roughy into rucks using the new trade system. It might still be a good idea as you never know when the DPP could come in handy...
I also have a feeling that giles
might pull out a ton this week. Brogan isnt playing and neither is Jolly for the pies
Thoughts on this mate? :)
Also, im worried about '%' as the top 4 spot isnt locked in
Try meditation.
Breathe in
Breathe out
Or save your trades.
What do u think of fever's trade plan doc?
Fever's hot. Like Roughy in the ruck.
You could still sit on Giles though. He may do enough not to drop too much this week.
You have had over 11000 views on this post.
I am responsible for 8000 of them! Time to get a life.
Quote from: tor01doc on July 27, 2012, 06:29:08 PM
Fever's hot. Like Roughy in the ruck.
You could still sit on Giles though. He may do enough not to drop too much this week.
You have had over 11000 views on this post.
I am responsible for 8000 of them! Time to get a life.
haha thanks mate
hope you held giles mate
Quote from: fever on July 29, 2012, 04:28:05 PM
hope you held giles mate
haha yeah i did mate. Bit angry at myself for not biting the bullet and trading darley > bagley...wouldve gone close to letting me not cop a percentage killing in my league game which i have already conceded defeat (unless nds, boyd, priddis score roughly 450 between them :P ) and also freed up cash...
Oh well...bring on finals I say...had enough of holding these last few trades
Another bloody loss for me this week despite scoring 2450 from 20 players. Im now a tad worried as it is possible for me to drop out the 4! Need a win this week or even a honourable loss to consolidate
10.5k. 3trades. Going for league(2nd)
goddard deledio scotland mjohnson broughton h.shaw s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett pendlebury selwood boyd dal-santo priddis <gibson d.smith>
mumford giles <campbell orren>
franklin sidebottom dangerfield roughead martin cloke zorko <milera adams>
Wait on Broughton.
If out then upgrade.
Stay posted for more gratuitous advice
And remember - you get what you pay for! ;)
Quote from: tor01doc on July 30, 2012, 08:13:58 PM
Wait on Broughton.
If out then upgrade.
Stay posted for more gratuitous advice
And remember - you get what you pay for! ;)
my new golden rule ;)
I agree...if greg is out, he has gotta go! Where do I get the moolah from tho? Considering i didntt downgrade last week.
With broughton now officially ruled out for the year :o he is goneski! Anyone have any ideas?
Oi there,
How about...ummmm..get rid of Broughton AND Buddy!? :o
Yes, if you trade both out, you could get Beams and Suckling OR ROK and Hurn.
Just a thought from left field.
If Buddy misses 2 rounds, you'll be stronger by far for those 2 and just a bit weaker for the rest - if at all.
Think i may hold Buddy
That is exactly what I would prescribe. ;)
Jay this is a suggestion from left field to replace Broughton and maybe a POD for you to look at Harbrow from Suns. Averaging 100 from the 4 games since his return from injury. Stumbled across him in my research and may take him myself.
Quote from: Ringo on August 02, 2012, 06:53:27 AM
Jay this is a suggestion from left field to replace Broughton and maybe a POD for you to look at Harbrow from Suns. Averaging 100 from the 4 games since his return from injury. Stumbled across him in my research and may take him myself.
yeah i like that Ringo! Dont have enough to do a straight swap...
D.smith > mcintyre???
Broughton > prem. def
Thoughts?
OK sorry was not sure you had the cash I did though.
You only have 3 trades left and need cash so obviosly a downgrade is necessary. Smith is your best option to either McIntyre or Couch both will keep the DPP. With Gibson playing strongly do not necessarily need to rely on thiis unless mass restings.
Broughton to a Prem and hopefully 100k to assist with last trade. If looking at Harbrow has an achievable B/e which is why I am probaby moving on him this week. Only owned by .65% of teams so relying on him as a POD for my second last trade for Broughton. He is playing the Bock riole on his return and final 4 games are against Melbourne, GWS, (both of which he should be up there and GCS will be striving for a win) Hawthorn, Carlton and Adelaide where ball will be predominantly in Suns back half.
You could trade Millera instaed of Smith but will lose $50k. Smith has an achievable B/e whereas Milera does not.
Quote from: Ringo on August 02, 2012, 08:32:56 AM
OK sorry was not sure you had the cash I did though.
You only have 3 trades left and need cash so obviosly a downgrade is necessary. Smith is your best option to either McIntyre or Couch both will keep the DPP. With Gibson playing strongly do not necessarily need to rely on thiis unless mass restings.
Broughton to a Prem and hopefully 100k to assist with last trade. If looking at Harbrow has an achievable B/e which is why I am probaby moving on him this week. Only owned by .65% of teams so relying on him as a POD for my second last trade for Broughton. He is playing the Bock riole on his return and final 4 games are against Melbourne, GWS, (both of which he should be up there and GCS will be striving for a win) Hawthorn, Carlton and Adelaide where ball will be predominantly in Suns back half.
You could trade Millera instaed of Smith but will lose $50k. Smith has an achievable B/e whereas Milera does not.
cheers ringo!
Ill certainly look at Harbrow when making the broughton trade! Either him, birchall or waters i think!
I dont think trading milera will work because next week i want to trade giles > fyfe and move roughy to rucks! And milera downgrade wont get me there
Anyone likre the idea of broyughton to fisher¿
You know I do.
Hey your team has the most 'views' f/b Ringo then felsty.
Well done. ;)
Another loss saw me slide down to 4th in league and now have to play best team in league. Im thinking i may just hold the traes as i feel i can knock off the team ill probly play next week (presuming i lose). But if i win, ill be in a good position trade wise! Obviously if i lose this week then ill double trade next...worst fear is that i will bow out with tradrs left!
Last week i completed a broughton > fisher trade...that leaves me with this lineup:
2trades...21.2k
goddard, deledio, h.shaw, scotland, mjohnson, fisher s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett, pendles, selwood, boyd, nds, priddis <gibson t.adams>
mumford, giles <orren campbell>
franklin, sidebottom, danger, roughy, cloke, martin, zorko <d.smith milera>
You know you should hold.
Save. You'll be glad.
Just look at your match ups Jay and then decide whether you need to trade. That is waht I am doing as I onkly have 2 trades left and am in sudden death in all but 1 of my leagues. Flower of a season this year but still aiming to improve my overall ranking to above last years.
With only 2 trades left and a pretty sad looking kitty, you'll have to do 2 trades for a genuine upgrade and S Shaw is really the only dodgy starter so I would wait until it is sudden death and you need to sideways for a rested or injured premium.
Raise your bat and point to the dressing room!
Quote from: tor01doc on August 08, 2012, 10:22:22 PM
Raise your bat and point to the dressing room!
only wish i could crack the ton in cricket as easy as i did on FF ;)
Score: 2255
Lost my qualifying final by 45 :( gibson needed to score 28 in the final qtr for my opp. to win...he ended up scoring 66 in the final qtr:'(
i now come up against Shane Crawford and his 'champs'. Here is how the matchups look (me on left):
h.shaw VS p.davis
m.johnson VS dempsey
scotland VS carrazzo
fisher VS morris
s.shaw VS m.clarke
boyd vs watson
priddis vs h.bennell
mumford vs hale
franklin VS pavlich
danger VS cyril
roughead VS petrie
t.cloke VS dickson
2trades...21.2k
goddard, deledio, h.shaw, scotland, mjohnson, fisher s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett, pendles, selwood, boyd, nds, priddis <gibson t.adams>
mumford, giles <orren campbell>
franklin, sidebottom, danger, roughy, cloke, martin, zorko <d.smith milera>
what would you do? :)
With those match ups I would win! :P
Only trade I would contemplate as I think you will win would be Franklin to Beams if Buddy is out again this week.
Quote from: tor01doc on August 13, 2012, 11:50:16 AM
With those match ups I would win! :P
who knows!
Quote from: Ringo on August 13, 2012, 12:23:14 PM
Only trade I would contemplate as I think you will win would be Franklin to Beams if Buddy is out again this week.
yeah sounds a good idea...will wait & see
Quote from: tor01doc on August 13, 2012, 11:50:16 AM
With those match ups I would win! :P
Trust me, apparently I'm a 'hard end' coach! :o
teams have been kind to me...i go into this week with a full-strength lineup for the first time in who knows how long!!!
Quote from: Jayman on August 13, 2012, 07:27:26 AM
2trades...21.2k
goddard, deledio, h.shaw, scotland, mjohnson, fisher s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett, pendles, selwood, boyd, nds, priddis <gibson t.adams>
mumford, giles <orren campbell>
franklin, sidebottom, danger, roughy, cloke, martin, zorko <d.smith milera>
question now is, do i trade?
Only thing I would consider is getting Couch for cash - Maybe Milera?
Quote from: tor01doc on August 16, 2012, 08:43:44 PM
Only thing I would consider is getting Couch for cash - Maybe Milera?
definitely worth considering...i have a sad looking kitty, so maybe some cash is the right move!?
only thing is...*presuming i win* my trades next week may not require cash as they could just be sideways trades due to injuries/restings
Quote from: Jayman on August 16, 2012, 08:13:25 PM
teams have been kind to me...i go into this week with a full-strength lineup for the first time in who knows how long!!!
Quote from: Jayman on August 13, 2012, 07:27:26 AM
2trades...21.2k
goddard, deledio, h.shaw, scotland, mjohnson, fisher s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett, pendles, selwood, boyd, nds, priddis <gibson t.adams>
mumford, giles <orren campbell>
franklin, sidebottom, danger, roughy, cloke, martin, zorko <d.smith milera>
question now is, do i trade?
'Full strength' = what?
S Shaw and Giles and Cloke in a team is possibly not going to fit the definition of 'full strength'.
If you are only playing Crawfs Chumps then I would get Crouch in for Milera and put an extra $171 800 plus your $21200 = $193 000.
$193 000 plus S Shaw who will be worth $350 000 by then = any defender you want.
Asian 15 wtf? :o
Quote from: tor01doc on August 17, 2012, 02:12:09 AM
Quote from: Jayman on August 16, 2012, 08:13:25 PM
teams have been kind to me...i go into this week with a full-strength lineup for the first time in who knows how long!!!
Quote from: Jayman on August 13, 2012, 07:27:26 AM
2trades...21.2k
goddard, deledio, h.shaw, scotland, mjohnson, fisher s.shaw <ellis darley>
ablett, pendles, selwood, boyd, nds, priddis <gibson t.adams>
mumford, giles <orren campbell>
franklin, sidebottom, danger, roughy, cloke, martin, zorko <d.smith milera>
question now is, do i trade?
'Full strength' = what?
S Shaw and Giles and Cloke in a team is possibly not going to fit the definition of 'full strength'.
If you are only playing Crawfs Chumps then I would get Crouch in for Milera and put an extra $171 800 plus your $21200 = $193 000.
$193 000 plus S Shaw who will be worth $350 000 by then = any defender you want.
Asian 15 wtf? :o
full-strength = best side out of players i have
Hmm im thinking about the milera > couch trade...just thinking that maybe the trade could be better used next week/week after. what im trying to say is, maybe next week, shaw, giles & cloke wont be my weakness because a couple of my premiums have been rested, requiring sideways trades, and then ill only have 1 :(
Question is: downgrade and get a premium back next week OR save trades for injuries/restings
THROUGH TO THE PRELIM :D
Just one? ;)
Quote from: tor01doc on August 20, 2012, 11:01:42 AM
Just one? ;)
nah... 2 ;D and in my two main leagues! Will post the matchups tonight
Ill start off with my team for this week, then get into the matchups
21.2k...2 trades
deledio scotland goddard m.johnson h.shaw s.shaw darley <fisher ellis(E)>
ablett(C) boyd dal-santo priddis pendlebury gibson <selwood t.adams(E)>
giles mumford <stephenson campbell>
dangerfield(VC) sidebottom roughead franklin martin cloke zorko <d.smith(E) milera>
MATCHHUPS FOR LEAGUE 1
m.johnson vs birchall
h.shaw vs dempsey
darley vs carrazzo
boyd vs watson
dal santo vs kennedy
priddis vs murphy
gibson vs d.thomas
giles vs goldstein
mumford vs c.pearce
sidebottom vs d.smith
martin vs christensen
MATCHUPS FOR LEAGUE 2
m.johnson vs birchall
h.shaw vs waters
s.shaw vs suckling
darley vs carrazzo
dal santo vs kennedy
priddis vs thompson
pendlebury vs murphy
gibson vs couch
mumford vs cox
roughead vs beams
martin vs chapman
cloke vs zaharakis
GOT ANY IDEAS? :)
Fisher Selwood - OUT
Hurn Murphy - IN!
Quote from: tor01doc on August 23, 2012, 09:36:13 PM
Fisher Selwood - OUT
Hurn Murphy - IN!
not a bad idea!
So pretty much just go for broke this week and pray i fall over the line next week?
Losing a prelim is like 4th at the Olympics - may as well not have bothered.
Quote from: tor01doc on August 23, 2012, 09:50:24 PM
Losing a prelim is like 4th at the Olympics - may as well not have bothered.
debatable (id be happy with 4th at the olympics) - but i see your point
Would i be better off getting another forward? As gibson is better than cloke and even martin!?!?
Problem is Cloke is so showerly priced now that you could afford sweet FA!
Selwood's worth is gold and wasted sitting on the bench.
Quote from: tor01doc on August 23, 2012, 09:59:09 PM
Problem is Cloke is so showerly priced now that you could afford sweet FA!
Selwood's worth is gold and wasted sitting on the bench.
trade selwood, move d.smith to mids then get a premium forward?
Leaves no bench cover in defence and I still think they'll have you covered.
Also just hope Cloke doesn't do something ridiculous like play footy.
Quote from: tor01doc on August 23, 2012, 10:04:35 PM
Leaves no bench cover in defence and I still think they'll have you covered.
Also just hope Cloke doesn't do something ridiculous like play footy.
dont follow - will still do fisher > ???hurn??? but then selwood > best fwd i can afford. Effectively it means i could play gibson over cloke BUT would have to sacrifice getting a prem. mid for a prem. fwd
ROK would be the best forward if you do that?
Murphy looks like he could go really big this week. I'd target him.
Quote from: tor01doc on August 23, 2012, 10:29:32 PM
ROK would be the best forward if you do that?
Murphy looks like he could go really big this week. I'd target him.
Gibson + ROK
vs
Cloke + Murphy
tough one
Personally I like the Murphy one.
BTW I'm keeping Selwood and getting Beams and Blee for Treloar and Ellis as I think I can sit him on the bench in the 2 leagues I am interested in. Both opponents have Selwood which is handy.
Quote from: tor01doc on August 23, 2012, 10:43:11 PM
Personally I like the Murphy one.
alright. Cheers mate
Quote from: tor01doc on August 23, 2012, 10:43:11 PM
BTW I'm keeping Selwood and getting Beams and Blee for Treloar and Ellis as I think I can sit him on the bench in the 2 leagues I am interested in. Both opponents have Selwood which is handy.
Beams, what an inclusion for this time if the year!!! Different situation to me as unlike you, im probly not the favourite
ok...3 options:
1. Fisher > Waters & Selwood > steveJ (moving d.smith to mids) (bench cloke)
2. Fisher > Hanley/Hurn & d.smith > goodes (retain selwood for next week & bench cloke)
3. Fisher > Hanley & Selwood > Murphy (bench gibson)
a couple of other solid options but had to.be narrowed down at some point, and these are my top 3
Fisher > Waters
Selwood > steveJ
dangerF captain
WON BOTH MY PRELIMS...NO TRADES FOR MY GRANNY THOUGH
1 out of 2 aint bad
???
much better than none! :)
you win the main one jay?
Quote from: tbagrocks on September 03, 2012, 12:44:57 AM
you win the main one jay?
well honestly both the GFs I made were main ones. Let's just say Im happy with the outcome. Got some good bragging to do know :P
I'd just like to say a huge thank you to everyone the helped me out with my supercoach team this year, I obviously couldn't have done it without you. Cheers :)