I can't decide which of the two to start with. Pendelbury will of cause get consistentl good scores, as will Swan. But Swan could be a better value pick, as he was partially injured early last year, which lowered his overall average. Who is the better pick to start with, as both will proabley be in my team after their bye.
Swan DT Pendles SC for mine 8)
starting with pendles and looking to upgrade to swan later in the year after a price drop.
Gone with swan for value and last season he did have a few average games a week in Arizona if he goes without all that this year he should at least equal pendles and for less outlay I'll new upgrading tompendles first.
Quote from: Tex-Factor on January 14, 2012, 01:29:09 PM
starting with pendles and looking to upgrade to swan later in the year after a price drop.
I hope you mean starting with Pendlebury and upgrading ROOKIES for Swan later. Pendles to Swan is a terrible trade!. He's a keeper
I did mean rookies. I wouldn't trade a premium for a premium
Quote from: nichsa673 on January 14, 2012, 05:15:25 PM
I did mean rookies. I wouldn't trade a premium for a premium
I was quoting tex, I hope that's what he meant
I think swan has a better chance of dropping value than pendles, so i would try to nab him if he goes below 590k. Start with pendles, even though ive gone ablett in my team.....
Quote from: PurpleArmy on January 14, 2012, 06:22:16 PM
Quote from: nichsa673 on January 14, 2012, 05:15:25 PM
I did mean rookies. I wouldn't trade a premium for a premium
I was quoting tex, I hope that's what he meant
yes..thats what i meant... :D
Simply both in DT and SC for me this year
I have both in my side along with Ablett. Guaranteed 500 points a week (1 as captain).
Collingwood have the bye in round 12. Don't let that prevent you from picking the #1 and #3 highest scoring players. Maximise your scoring potential for the first 11 weeks and cross the bye bridge when you come to it. Just ensure you have cover on your bench and sit the guns out on the bench for 1 week.
Have Both in my team along with ablett and Murphy.
Quote from: jasonweare on January 14, 2012, 11:47:50 PM
Have Both in my team along with ablett and Murphy.
F^ck me dead sounds like a ripping midfield jasonweare. No mucking around hey!
I has 6 premium mid field
Swan, Pendlebury, Ablett, Murphy, Selwood, Boyd
:D
broke my balls but was worth it. i think
Quote from: charliesheen on January 14, 2012, 11:53:02 PM
I has 6 premium mid field
Swan, Pendlebury, Ablett, Murphy, Selwood, Boyd
:D
broke my balls but was worth it. i think
Best part of 850 points a week right there. Sounds alright to me. May compromise other areas of your side though.
BOTH!
Quote from: charliesheen on January 14, 2012, 11:53:02 PM
I has 6 premium mid field
Swan, Pendlebury, Ablett, Murphy, Selwood, Boyd
:D
broke my balls but was worth it. i think
What's your plan for round 12 with your three prems?
Quote from: charliesheen on January 14, 2012, 11:53:02 PM
I has 6 premium mid field
Swan, Pendlebury, Ablett, Murphy, Selwood, Boyd
:D
broke my balls but was worth it. i think
How can you possibly afford that? And how does that leave you with enough mid rookies (who usually make the most $) and how many premiums on other lines are you missing out on? How many risky mid-pricers are there instead? We'd all love to stack the midfield but surely it's just not possible, otherwise most would.