(https://i.imgur.com/Q1734vl.jpg)
Just a rough draft, Daicos with the bye may need to go but he's there as POD for now, can grab Brayshaw or Serong as a back-up. Same deal with Merrett who i also like.
Note the 3 ruck strategy, this may be a good way to get a bit of a jump before the price rises kick in.
Looks very strong. I don't subscribe to putting a premium in flex unless they are sure to score more than the value you take off your field. Which I think is not even possible... Your just moving the points from field to flex.
Unless it's a 3rd Ruck. Which otherwise you can't have.
But you haven't given up much on field, if anything on teams with a top end rook in flex.
Looks like a few cheaper rooks than most and Mills at D3 rather than 4. That with the two top ruck combo.
Top Premo's throughout, I like it.
Personally I'd grab one of the young mids like Draper or Smillie (this is assuming that Lalor is out early with the busted jaw) and turn that Daicos money into a premium defender. I don't know if the rookie priced defenders will give us much run. Busslinger may be okay while Jones is out, I don't know if Bice will get a game and Reid is chronically injured. I think structure wise it will give you more points and security.
I believe Curtin may still be out for a while. Otherwise yeah it's a wait and see with the rookies.
Quote from: Mat0369 on February 18, 2025, 06:19:55 PMPersonally I'd grab one of the young mids like Draper or Smillie (this is assuming that Lalor is out early with the busted jaw) and turn that Daicos money into a premium defender. I don't know if the rookie priced defenders will give us much run. Busslinger may be okay while Jones is out, I don't know if Bice will get a game and Reid is chronically injured. I think structure wise it will give you more points and security.
I can also swing Travaglia or El-Hawli back to defence and grab a discount mid, that will be contingent on all the rookies available.
(https://i.imgur.com/FGPCauf.png)
This looks ok to me, I may look at ways to squeeze Draper in there, it just depends on the other rookies being named.
I agree with Matt, you probably want a D4 that is not a rookie. That's a significant risk. EXCEPT you aren't counting one of them, because you are counting Marshall. So important to keep that in mind.
Your Rookies are lean but some of the potential best options are also low priced in stone, davidson, k smith.
But if you need to upgrade rooks you can always sinclair to wanganeen and or brayshaw to dawson.
Levi is a watch too as I'm sure you know at least get a round 0 view on him.
Can probably live without parker too, although I like him a lot he could go down to a Maric Hutchinson Curtin or berry to sort rooks as required.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 18, 2025, 08:17:15 PMI agree with Matt, you probably want a D4 that is not a rookie. That's a significant risk. EXCEPT you aren't counting one of them, because you are counting Marshall. So important to keep that in mind.
Your Rookies are lean but some of the potential best options are also low priced in stone, davidson, k smith.
But if you need to upgrade rooks you can always sinclair to wanganeen and or brayshaw to dawson.
Levi is a watch too as I'm sure you know at least get a round 0 view on him.
Can probably live without parker too, although I like him a lot he could go down to a Maric Hutchinson Curtin or berry to sort rooks as required.
Travaglia could go back to defence, Knevitt on the ground, I'm just not sold on the defenders at the minute, maybe Dale or Stewart, those 2 represent decent value but I prefer Brayshaw in there at the moment.
I think with the flex, having a slightly fragile defence isn't as risky as it has been in years gone by.
Kaleb Smith is pretty risky, as a Richmond supporter I'm not sold, but one of Trainor or Smith could sit on the bench.
When I did my draft with the 3 ruck guns I ended up taking out JHF. I feel like I can see a few forward rookies with better scoring and job security than the defenders. You could get a Holmes/Stewart/Dale for the same price.
Quote from: Mat0369 on February 18, 2025, 08:42:37 PMWhen I did my draft with the 3 ruck guns I ended up taking out JHF. I feel like I can see a few forward rookies with better scoring and job security than the defenders. You could get a Holmes/Stewart/Dale for the same price.
I can see the merit in that approach, I'll have a look and see what I can come up with. Out of those 3 who do you pick?
I currently have Stewart but I'm not sold. I'm dicking around with a bunch of teams, I made one with 3 rucks the other night, I'll post it here.
3 Premo ruck 1.png
I don't like my D4-D6, but I didn't mind the team as a place holder. There is cash there to spread around on cheaper rookies and upgrades. I had a bunch of cash and was able to turn Stewart into Ryan. I had some other structures which I liked better and will probably lean that way
Quote from: Mat0369 on February 18, 2025, 08:52:06 PMI currently have Stewart but I'm not sold. I'm dicking around with a bunch of teams, I made one with 3 rucks the other night, I'll post it here.
3 Premo ruck 1.png
I don't like my D4-D6, but I didn't mind the team as a place holder. There is cash there to spread around on cheaper rookies and upgrades. I had a bunch of cash and was able to turn Stewart into Ryan. I had some other structures which I liked better and will probably lean that way
English over Xerri is an interesting selection, Tim's backend to the year was underwhelming, but he could turn it around, would be a great POD if he returns to 2023 form.
Quote from: Bully on February 18, 2025, 11:04:14 PMEnglish over Xerri is an interesting selection, Tim's backend to the year was underwhelming, but he could turn it around, would be a great POD if he returns to 2023 form.
Rucks are an awkward position. Guys can have out of the box amazing years and then toil away in the middle of the pack while never hitting those heights again. It's hard to pick Xerri based off one season when the sample size isn't there. It was an amazing season, but to spend that capital you want to make sure he is due for an elite one.
I didn't realise how good English was in the first 8 rounds minus the Bombers game. I was annoyed because Gawn was going off and English was my POD compared to the Gawn/Grundy ruck combos a lot of teams had. He was really up and down after that, particularly post bye where it was one great score, one crap one, great one, crap one etc. 2023 may have been his out of the box season and he could be in that good but not great tier the rest of his career. Although I feel like he has shown the flashes for stretches, it's his body that has let him down on occasion like in 2022. Maybe the contract sorted will also see him play more consistent footy since he has that security and knows where he will be playing.
(https://i.imgur.com/VoH5lDO.png)
This version has top heavy defence, bringing in English looks the best method to get the pick of the midfield rookies, Langford over Smillie based on exposed form but I can trade down if need be.
I don't mind the structure I'm toying with the idea of dropping my only full price fwd Horne bag also, but they do have a great early run. Besides I'd only be doing it to bring in mid priced risks in the midfield so resisting temptation at this point. You also seem to have resisted all but the must have mid pricers which is sound strategy.
Just watched the practice match and I don't think not starting nick is wise. Could be wrong and we have round zero to make our minds up for us, but he played on Neale and if he didn't have 30 in 2 quarters I must be a one eyed magpie because that's what it looked like to me, plus a goal :)
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 20, 2025, 09:06:38 PMI don't mind the structure I'm toying with the idea of dropping my only full price fwd Horne bag also, but they do have a great early run. Besides I'd only be doing it to bring in mid priced risks in the midfield so resisting temptation at this point. You also seem to have resisted all but the must have mid pricers which is sound strategy.
Just watched the practice match and I don't think not starting nick is wise. Could be wrong and we have round zero to make our minds up for us, but he played on Neale and if he didn't have 30 in 2 quarters I must be a one eyed magpie because that's what it looked like to me, plus a goal :)
It's the early bye which concerns me, he seems like a logical upgrade target but if the case is compelling enough then I think you have to bite the bullet and pick him.
(https://i.imgur.com/B241dWP.png)
Just a few tweaks with the rookies, I think we can rule out Smillie, touch and go for round 1 and you will be going in blind. I think with the wealth of options in that range it's better to grab someone with a half decent body of work. Langford still in the picture, Tsatas might be another but his kicking does concern me. Ashcroft is a lock, the others will need closer examination. Leake makes defence look less leaky, could be some midfield upside which is perfect for D6.
I'm not sold on Draper after the game today, see what the next one delivers.
Angove for the giants looks almost certain though he was solid, Leake was also very good. I've put a line through stone for now. Not sure I'd pay up for Curtin either over berry in fwd line.
Still cannot bring myself to lynch, could be personal, I've never liked the guy.
O'Driscoll is worth a look, job security no vest could be a safe on field mid option, same for tsatas.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 21, 2025, 11:43:44 PMI'm not sold on Draper after the game today, see what the next one delivers.
Angove for the giants looks almost certain though he was solid, Leake was also very good. I've put a line through stone for now. Not sure I'd pay up for Curtin either over berry in fwd line.
Still cannot bring myself to lynch, could be personal, I've never liked the guy.
O'Driscoll is worth a look, job security no vest could be a safe on field mid option, same for tsatas.
O'Driscoll is good for 60, that's ok for a rookie, I was never that hot on Draper to be honest, I also like Langford but his role isn't clearly defined.
Yes I don't know much about / haven't seen much on Langford but talk is he's a gun and a starter. The north lad O'Sullivan is still an option possibly.
O'Driscoll scored 107 fantasy (i think) points in 60 something % tog in IAS game. 60 would be enough but potential for more I think.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 22, 2025, 12:02:20 AMYes I don't know much about / haven't seen much on Langford but talk is he's a gun and a starter. The north lad O'Sullivan is still an option possibly.
O'Driscoll scored 107 fantasy (i think) points in 60 something % tog in IAS game. 60 would be enough but potential for more I think.
O'Driscoll has a high ceiling, his past averages have contained quite a few sub affected scores so there's decent upside. Probably a better bet than Tsatas who is untested as an AFL inside midfielder. His kicking makes him somewhat risky.
Kind of hoping Ed Allan gets a gig but sub risk is huge even if he does.
I'm just looking to avoid vests with those 2nd year players hopefully the north kids proves to be a lock or Lalor or Smilie gets back for round one
(https://i.imgur.com/5J2fhqC.png)
I just can't squeeze O'Driscoll in there at the minute, but I'm still looking at other possibilities. Only a measly 1k in the bank so 17k isn't so easy. Any suggestions or should I just plump for Langford?
Love the risk you have with 3 prem rucks. First team I have seen with it but nice POD compared with other teams.
Round 1 selections may assist you though or even the practice matches to see who makes the teams couple of concerns from the last games Trav only played one quarter and Hewett was not in Eagles a side in match sim. So you may get cash for O'Driscoll.
Quote from: Ringo on February 22, 2025, 03:39:25 PMLove the risk you have with 3 prem rucks. First team I have seen with it but nice POD compared with other teams.
Round 1 selections may assist you though or even the practice matches to see who makes the teams couple of concerns from the last games Trav only played one quarter and Hewett was not in Eagles a side in match sim. So you may get cash for O'Driscoll.
I think I'm cooling on Marshall, timeshare an imminent danger, Xerri in and I'll use Henderson as an early loop, I think he will see some game time eventually . Only 3k in the bank, things pretty tight even for marginal upgrades.
(https://i.imgur.com/RfdLlQT.png)
Thoughts on Blight at Richmond? Hearing he scores well and is best 22, expensive but worth a look?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 25, 2025, 07:17:09 PMThoughts on Blight at Richmond? Hearing he scores well and is best 22, expensive but worth a look?
I think any of the Richmond rookies could be playing with fire, the side is a work in progress so continuity maybe an issue. Lynch is the best bet but I'm finding myself unable to squeeze him in with all the backline carnage.
(https://i.imgur.com/ujObBfI.png)
Might be the best all round team I've seen. I'm loathe to give up Horne but something has to give. Scoring 2-3 30's from def rooks on field is just out of the question. Allan should be safe, the rest?? Prior be ok if he's definitely in the best 22. But playing with fire back there. Mid price options aren't exactly locks like the fwd line and mids to a slightly lesser extent so 5 premiums seems a very smart play.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 25, 2025, 07:56:50 PMMight be the best all round team I've seen. I'm loathe to give up Horne but something has to give. Scoring 2-3 30's from def rooks on field is just out of the question. Allan should be safe, the rest?? Prior be ok if he's definitely in the best 22. But playing with fire back there. Mid price options aren't exactly locks like the fwd line and mids to a slightly lesser extent so 5 premiums seems a very smart play.
Terrific side Bully.. Can't fault.
Hate to do it to you again :)
Butters out for start of season - surgery.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 25, 2025, 08:26:21 PMHate to do it to you again :)
Butters out for start of season - surgery.
Wow!!
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 25, 2025, 08:26:21 PMHate to do it to you again :)
Butters out for start of season - surgery.
Good lord! Daicos versus Merrett, I would say Merrett based on the bye but I do like the form Daicos is in, it's just that bye which is an irritant.
Are Carlton still tagging? Straight after the bye it's the Blues.
Quote from: Bully on February 25, 2025, 08:57:48 PMAre Carlton still tagging? Straight after the bye it's the Blues.
Hewett can at times but the perfect preview of Nick being tagged will be round zero Vs the Giants. If they bother.
Early Bye is a killer round 0 will decide me, if he's 110+ with old mate for company I reckon by the time you could do the upgrade to him he'll be the dearest player in the comp.
Merrett no early bye and VC option as early games most rounds, super reliable probably safest pick in SC.
To confuse it I have gone Daicos to replace Butters. With the carnage decided I could play a Rd 0 premium as would not lose too much at all. And have the advantage of Nick in team if he goes off.
I was getting GWS mixed up with hawks. Hawks have the Finn who I think is possibly the best tagger. Giants have Bedford. Who is still a solid test case round 0 for Nick.
I'm trying very hard this season to have trades until the death, so starting the right premiums is essential, I'm pretty certain Nick is one of those.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 25, 2025, 09:07:05 PMQuote from: Bully on February 25, 2025, 08:57:48 PMAre Carlton still tagging? Straight after the bye it's the Blues.
Hewett can at times but the perfect preview of Nick being tagged will be round zero Vs the Giants. If they bother.
Early Bye is a killer round 0 will decide me, if he's 110+ with old mate for company I reckon by the time you could do the upgrade to him he'll be the dearest player in the comp.
Merrett no early bye and VC option as early games most rounds, super reliable probably safest pick in SC.
The fact Essendon play a stack of early games rules out any Essendon rookies being reliable loopholes, I raised this point earlier because if you have 3 or more it will be mighty tough to get two bites of the cherry.
Merrett is also 10k cheaper, that may not sound like much but it could be enough to get another decent rookie, maybe a Smillie or Tsatas.
It feels like every time we're somewhat settled, injuries strike and it's back to the drawing board.
Quote from: Mat0369 on February 26, 2025, 12:00:14 AMIt feels like every time we're somewhat settled, injuries strike and it's back to the drawing board.
yeah, my 3 ruck strategy has been foiled before it even started, if Hewett struggles there may even be more shuffling needed.
Tsatas probably essential after 31 disposals, not sure I can fit both O'Driscoll & Tsatas but I will try.
My worry with Tsatas is what happens when Parish returns? He is expected to play Round 1 and Tsatas could have a good opening round before reverting back to a pumpkin. Still, the risk will outweigh the reward with a free hit.
Quote from: Mat0369 on February 26, 2025, 12:29:34 AMMy worry with Tsatas is what happens when Parish returns? He is expected to play Round 1 and Tsatas could have a good opening round before reverting back to a pumpkin. Still, the risk will outweigh the reward with a free hit.
I think his inside game has really improved, it was never terrible, he was a 10 contested possession guy in juniors, the kicking on the other hand still not overly reliable. Parish shouldn't affect him too much, the way the coach has been talking he'll probably get a decent run.
(https://i.imgur.com/VP6tQrL.png)
Updated with the Butters news, this team leaves a slight hole in cash generation but a viable loophole and maximum onfield scoring potential. Don't think Henderson plays early but at 25 years of age I'm expecting some gametime. I think ideally I would want Kako or Berry in the team, I hope that doesn't hurt too much. I see Kako now at 55% ownership, he won't kick 4 every week however, this is probably one area I can legitimately cut a few corners.
That's a very stacked DEF. Haven't seen any with 5 premos in there. Just keep an eye for rookies come the season.
Quote from: arbel on February 26, 2025, 01:41:07 PMThat's a very stacked DEF. Haven't seen any with 5 premos in there. Just keep an eye for rookies come the season.
Is there any rookie I'm missing?
I can get Berry & Kako by giving up one of O'Driscoll or Tsatas. Worth it or not?
Or should I downgrade Nas to Dale and upgrade Henderson to a 119k rookie?
Quote from: Bully on February 26, 2025, 05:05:16 PMQuote from: arbel on February 26, 2025, 01:41:07 PMThat's a very stacked DEF. Haven't seen any with 5 premos in there. Just keep an eye for rookies come the season.
Is there any rookie I'm missing?
I can get Berry & Kako by giving up one of O'Driscoll or Tsatas. Worth it or not?
Or should I downgrade Nas to Dale and upgrade Henderson to a 119k rookie?
Yes, I recon it is worth it.. get Kako!
Dale is now in doubt haha. This is insane
Quote from: Ashmore62 on February 26, 2025, 05:50:20 PMQuote from: Bully on February 26, 2025, 05:05:16 PMQuote from: arbel on February 26, 2025, 01:41:07 PMThat's a very stacked DEF. Haven't seen any with 5 premos in there. Just keep an eye for rookies come the season.
Is there any rookie I'm missing?
I can get Berry & Kako by giving up one of O'Driscoll or Tsatas. Worth it or not?
Or should I downgrade Nas to Dale and upgrade Henderson to a 119k rookie?
Yes, I recon it is worth it.. get Kako!
Next question, how do I come up with 50k? Rookie downgrade or premo downgrade?
Quote from: Mat0369 on February 26, 2025, 06:02:57 PMDale is now in doubt haha. This is insane
This is like chook lotto, at least we're not burning trades, I get the funny feeling this season will require a fair degree of luck on the injury front.
(https://i.imgur.com/N89GKdd.png)
I think I'll be grabbing Daicos, I also liked Houston but that kills me with the bye. Put a line through Richmond players, better grabbing rookies with a better support cast.
I reckon blight will play every game, but not sure he'll score enough at that high starting price.
Nice Team only concern Rd 3 bye with the prems missing. Bye structure this year a real pain.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on February 27, 2025, 07:26:35 AMI reckon blight will play every game, but not sure he'll score enough at that high starting price.
He's got a dodgy shoulder plus he's a little raw, if you want to roll the dice on a Tiger then Trainor looks AFL quality, biggest positive for a Richmond supporter in a game we were absolutely flogged.
Houston back to firing rockets, looks like he hasn't missed a beat from last season.
Quote from: Ringo on February 27, 2025, 09:16:43 AMNice Team only concern Rd 3 bye with the prems missing. Bye structure this year a real pain.
Every year this happens and every year I pick players I don't really like. I seriously hate this round 0 bollocks.
Nah not missing any rookies down back, but might be worth downgrading one of the prems to a Perryman/Short. I wonder if Tom De Koning is worth getting now? Pittonet now out for 6 weeks so he'll be solo rucking.
Quote from: arbel on February 27, 2025, 11:52:09 AMNah not missing any rookies down back, but might be worth downgrading one of the prems to a Perryman/Short. I wonder if Tom De Koning is worth getting now? Pittonet now out for 6 weeks so he'll be solo rucking.
Perryman is another with an awkward bye, Holmes probably a better bet under these circumstances. Short won't be top 6, can't see it with so much disarray across the board. Holmes still trending up, I think 105 avg. not out of the question.
De Koning versus English, tough one but I'm inclined to grab the player with a bit more clarity with their role.
(https://i.imgur.com/RWSBd9N.png)
Updated with the Bont news, Merrett is the obvious replacement for team balance, I like Serong but I already have Brayshaw. The flex spot now looking much better, there's still a few good rookies in the Powell-Pepper price range if he doesn't get up.
Any concerns with Angove after last night, Very limited time even with the outs Swans had - I put a line through him plenty of other options though,
Quote from: Ringo on March 01, 2025, 09:11:43 AMAny concerns with Angove after last night, Very limited time even with the outs Swans had - I put a line through him plenty of other options though,
Yes, not a good sign, but L Camporeale certainly threw his hat in the ring, JS might be an issue.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 01, 2025, 10:08:45 AMQuote from: Ringo on March 01, 2025, 09:11:43 AMAny concerns with Angove after last night, Very limited time even with the outs Swans had - I put a line through him plenty of other options though,
Yes, not a good sign, but L Camporeale certainly threw his hat in the ring, JS might be an issue.
(https://i.imgur.com/I44Gndi.png)
I think 20 possessions & 2 clearances is a terrific sign from Camporeale, having a punt with M10 isn't such a bad move, worst case scenario is he becomes a loophole.
Team looks great, English looked very good, ton of marks.
What worries me with Campo is he will be the sub. I'd love to see him get some early games and he looks like he played the role pretty well. It would be great to have a Campo running around on the wing again
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 01, 2025, 01:39:21 PMWhat worries me with Campo is he will be the sub. I'd love to see him get some early games and he looks like he played the role pretty well. It would be great to have a Campo running around on the wing again
I think there's a sub risk with all the cheapies, if he's in the starting squad I reckon it's worth the gamble.
Looks like SPP played. I'm wondering how he is he doubtful for round 1? He would have to play and it gives us another rookie
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 01, 2025, 05:48:17 PMLooks like SPP played. I'm wondering how he is he doubtful for round 1? He would have to play and it gives us another rookie
That's good news, not sold on Lynch, have to remember he's played 8 games in 2 years.
Quote from: Bully on March 01, 2025, 05:56:56 PMQuote from: Mat0369 on March 01, 2025, 05:48:17 PMLooks like SPP played. I'm wondering how he is he doubtful for round 1? He would have to play and it gives us another rookie
That's good news, not sold on Lynch, have to remember he's played 8 games in 2 years.
Yeah I've brought SPP in, was very solid today, leadership group best 22, he's just SPP but he's just $180,500 = no brainer.
Also in my flex.
(https://i.imgur.com/Ob8c9v3.png)
Brayshaw to Cerra, Hewett to Flynn, Powell-Pepper to the forwards. Could work, Cerra was excellent for a half, still have 5k to bring in Hewett if he gets up in time.
Such a strong backline. Good team should do very well.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 02, 2025, 12:19:14 PMSuch a strong backline. Good team should do very well.
Cheers! Hopefully Allan gets up but if not then might have to find more cash for Prior. If they are both missing then it might be time to consider a floating donut.
(https://i.imgur.com/YEiHUcK.png)
Just reading the blogs from West Coast supporters, Allan 50/50, not sold on Prior, would rather spend the money in the midfield on a guy like Langford. Short not top 6 but I think if you view him as a marginal cash generator then he becomes a viable proposition. This would probably be the most stacked defence in Supercoach history but this year I predict most of the troubles will start when defensive rookies start dropping off. Don't want a repeat of last year with Reid stuck on the bench for the whole season doing diddly squat.
(https://i.imgur.com/UEIQ57H.png)
Even better, JHF very likely to be a top 6 forward, looking at this team I think 3 lines are almost set and forget, most of the work will need to be done with midfield upgrades but there would appear to be decent cash generation. I also think the incessant byes throughout the year might blunt some of the early impact of a midfield heavy formation. I think I'm almost settled on this approach, Kako's quiet games should be ironed out with the flex, don't think I've ever started this skinny in the midfield but I reckon the midfield is where the money generation will come.
The mid rooks are certain to be the best scorers so the strategy is sound. Team doesn't look right without JHF or Rankine as a POD at F1, see a lot with both, but I think the money spent in Defense is better.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 02, 2025, 05:03:58 PMThe mid rooks are certain to be the best scorers so the strategy is sound. Team doesn't look right without JHF or Rankine as a POD at F1, see a lot with both, but I think the money spent in Defense is better.
There's also plenty of get out of jail cards in the midfield, back-up in Langford, O'Sullivan & Draper if there's a bolter from the first year players.The backline is a different story, nothing certain with the rookies on offer.
Christian Petracca is tempting me, would love to squeeze him in but won't unless there's some decent defensive rookies.
I don't know why there hasn't been more talk around Trac. Really under-priced
LDU is the other one that went nuts after a slow start last year and hasn't been spoken about
There is talk of Brisbane and Geelong being moved, that would change everything
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 03, 2025, 01:36:27 PMI don't know why there hasn't been more talk around Trac. Really under-priced
LDU is the other one that went nuts after a slow start last year and hasn't been spoken about
There is talk of Brisbane and Geelong being moved, that would change everything
What's the talk? Haven't heard about that one.
Cyclone is due to hit the heart of Brisbane on Thursday. It would be a danger to play the game with the 100 km/h winds and all the rain. Lions have already asked for the game to move, Dillon said they're going ahead at this stage with the hope it dies down and make a last minute call
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 03, 2025, 04:44:16 PMCyclone is due to hit the heart of Brisbane on Thursday. It would be a danger to play the game with the 100 km/h winds and all the rain. Lions have already asked for the game to move, Dillon said they're going ahead at this stage with the hope it dies down and make a last minute call
How would that affect the byes?
They both have a round 3 game, Brisbane have requested they play the game instead in Round 3. So all Cats and Lions would no longer have an early bye. Zorko, Neale and Ashcroft are all arguably locks. Holmes comes into contention and Stewart is almost a lock as well at his price
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 03, 2025, 05:28:13 PMThey both have a round 3 game, Brisbane have requested they play the game instead in Round 3. So all Cats and Lions would no longer have an early bye. Zorko, Neale and Ashcroft are all arguably locks. Holmes comes into contention and Stewart is almost a lock as well at his price
That would be great for my side!
(https://i.imgur.com/bCBKX0B.png)
A fixture change could open a few doors, Houston was never part of the conversation but he could be if Holmes & Stewart are playing round 3. Downgrading Whitfield to Petracca also allows me to go English up to Xerri, much easier to start with him rather than attempt to get him on the price drop. Can always reassess after 2 rounds and buy any other top performer, Flynn could be handy under those circumstances.
Cyclone looking likely to hit landfall, Fagan is spot on 'safety first', Supercoach aside, people need to get their animals out of harms way and bunker down until things subside.
Good call by the AFL, both matches postponed so all the Cats, Lions, Suns & Bombers back in the frame.
Quote from: Bully on March 04, 2025, 05:02:54 PMGood call by the AFL, both matches postponed so all the Cats, Lions, Suns & Bombers back in the frame.
I don't think so, looks like Lions and cats might play on their round 3 bye so no early bye for them.
But due to the suns and bombers having had different early byes they will probably be scheduled for later in the season, so they still have the early bye.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 04, 2025, 06:34:23 PMQuote from: Bully on March 04, 2025, 05:02:54 PMGood call by the AFL, both matches postponed so all the Cats, Lions, Suns & Bombers back in the frame.
I don't think so, looks like Lions and cats might play on their round 3 bye so no early bye for them.
But due to the suns and bombers having had different early byes they will probably be scheduled for later in the season, so they still have the early bye.
Fair enough, Merrett & Neale less appealing but they weren't in the frame for me.
Quick question, I can just squeeze in O'Sullivan but at the expense of Kako & Knevitt, worth it or not? Would leave me with a 113k player like Campo on the bench. The thinking is Kako will have some quiet games and might be too inconsistent. Knevitt almost borderline best 22.
Quote from: Bully on March 04, 2025, 08:37:56 PMQuote from: Colliwobblers on March 04, 2025, 06:34:23 PMQuote from: Bully on March 04, 2025, 05:02:54 PMGood call by the AFL, both matches postponed so all the Cats, Lions, Suns & Bombers back in the frame.
I don't think so, looks like Lions and cats might play on their round 3 bye so no early bye for them.
But due to the suns and bombers having had different early byes they will probably be scheduled for later in the season, so they still have the early bye.
Fair enough, Merrett & Neale less appealing but they weren't in the frame for me.
Quick question, I can just squeeze in O'Sullivan but at the expense of Kako & Knevitt, worth it or not? Would leave me with a 113k player like Campo on the bench. The thinking is Kako will have some quiet games and might be too inconsistent. Knevitt almost borderline best 22.
I think it is worth it, O'Sullivan is a gun has the role. I'll most likely do similar, knevitt and sheldrick up down to him and basement rook, or is O'driscoll sub him straight to O'sullivan, but O'sullivan looks like a lock.
Kako has inconsistent scoring ahead of him so he'd be the easy one to cut.
Quote from: Bully on March 04, 2025, 08:37:56 PMFair enough, Merrett & Neale less appealing but they weren't in the frame for me.
Quick question, I can just squeeze in O'Sullivan but at the expense of Kako & Knevitt, worth it or not? Would leave me with a 113k player like Campo on the bench. The thinking is Kako will have some quiet games and might be too inconsistent. Knevitt almost borderline best 22.
Playing round 3 means all their games count now. That's a bonus.
(https://i.imgur.com/67izpGT.png)
This is close to being settled, I'm hoping either Trainor or Bice get the nod otherwise it's back to the drawing board.
I've picked Clark on the grounds he's in a very strong line-up, very consistent last year and should keep it up. Bye friendly in the early rounds, Houston & Whitfield missing in rounds 2 & 3.
My last draft actually looks super similar to this and has Jordan Clark as well
It's a pretty great looking team, I can feel mine changing a few times between now and round 1, but I can't really fault it
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 05, 2025, 01:45:43 AMMy last draft actually looks super similar to this and has Jordan Clark as well
It's a pretty great looking team, I can feel mine changing a few times between now and round 1, but I can't really fault it
I think my tinkering will be limited to the rookies now, Erasmus might become Hall or another cheapie like Stone, will make a final call when I examine the team sheets.
Yeah structure is perfect and very low risk compared to mine.
Paton named for first match, 133k, definite watch list. Leake on extended bench, job security must be tenuous.
Might have to downgrade Petracca to Rozee to free up some cash.
I was thinking Paton might have the gig while McCartin plays forward. I don't know how he is going to score though, he does provide a nice alternative to Prior if he scores well
Quote from: Bully on March 06, 2025, 09:42:48 PMPaton named for first match, 133k, definite watch list. Leake on extended bench, job security must be tenuous.
Might have to downgrade Petracca to Rozee to free up some cash.
There's 4, or is it 5 giants suspended for start of season, these GWS rooks will have to be elite to hold their spots?
I don't like the GWS rookies chances, I reckon Trainor might have a bit more staying power to be honest. You could probably get away with Leake on the bench because I think he will score ok when he plays.
Richmond might have 4 debutants - Lalor, Armstrong, Trainor & Sims
I reckon I'll get on any richmond rooks named round 1. excellent job security
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 07, 2025, 11:23:11 AMI reckon I'll get on any richmond rooks named round 1. excellent job security
Yeah agree with that... you'd think Richmond rookies have the best chance to be on the park more than others
(https://i.imgur.com/2UQrwDr.png)
With the Sheldrick news I'm restructuring, Short down to Roberts gives me just enough to get Kako/Knevitt, those two are a wait and see. I'm removing Stewart for Rozee, that seems like a slight upgrade although Stewart is still good value. I think Holmes with the DPP is the better bet out of the Cats premos.
I like the look of this better.
S Wicks very tempting role is there coach was very pleased with him in the presser. Pity we have to start him as a fwd or I'd likely slot him into my DEF for sure.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 08, 2025, 02:36:46 PMI like the look of this better.
S Wicks very tempting role is there coach was very pleased with him in the presser. Pity we have to start him as a fwd or I'd likely slot him into my DEF for sure.
Very awkwardly priced is Wicks, pity he's not 50k cheaper. The DPP would be super handy however, perfect linkman for Paton.
Turns out no injury to Sheldrick, purely tactical which isn't promising. I really like him as a player but it would be tough for him to have the role that plays to his strengths with Warner, Rowbottom and Heeney being the first choice mids. It looks like he is competing with Adams for the spot and they both played, Adams has a hamstring now so maybe he does get a decent run at it.
I think Roberts has to be a lock now and does free up some cash from the more expensive defenders. Worst case he is a stepping stone, but he should make some good coin.
I'd feel good with Paton at D6/D7, I am still thinking of maybe going a bit more expensive down back, but the structure looks good if the rookies score well and can be backed to play.
(https://i.imgur.com/rJpASu6.png)
Too risky to go light in defence, I think Leake is probably a trap with very few alternatives. This side is very mid priced but you never know, some may turn out to be keepers.
It's a trading game, I'm likely to add a player to defence after Nick. Still certain he'll be at the top in the end, but a down game and an early bye makes for an upgrade target asap.
One more value mid and one less defensive rookie is the go.
Team looks good with the pick of the rucks and flynn.
Rozee hurt? Wondering if I should be picking another mid.
Quote from: Bully on March 10, 2025, 11:51:17 AMRozee hurt? Wondering if I should be picking another mid.
He stubbed his toe, which is either nothing or 12 weeks. I haven't seen any updates since he did it but I'm assuming it's nothing. for now.
Quote from: Bully on March 10, 2025, 11:51:17 AMRozee hurt? Wondering if I should be picking another mid.
I watched the vision, he seemed to be limping but unless it develops into turf toe he should be okay. I wasn't intending to start him anyway.
If you want to keep the same structure you could always start Rankine forward or another premium defender and start Holmes as a mid.
Trainor Lalo and Armstrong to debut. I like the look of all 3 but you've put me off Lalor (though i might just put my hands over my ears and ignore you and take him anyway). Armstrong looks awesome, but I fear supply issues similar to why I've never entertained the Lynch pick.
Still exciting talent for the Tigs to be on display.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 10, 2025, 06:23:21 PMTrainor Lalo and Armstrong to debut. I like the look of all 3 but you've put me off Lalor (though i might just put my hands over my ears and ignore you and take him anyway). Armstrong looks awesome, but I fear supply issues similar to why I've never entertained the Lynch pick.
Still exciting talent for the Tigs to be on display.
You can always trade Lalor to another 200k player if it's a worst case scenario. I just expect him to be eased in rather than thrown in the guts from the get go.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 10, 2025, 03:57:37 PMQuote from: Bully on March 10, 2025, 11:51:17 AMRozee hurt? Wondering if I should be picking another mid.
I watched the vision, he seemed to be limping but unless it develops into turf toe he should be okay. I wasn't intending to start him anyway.
If you want to keep the same structure you could always start Rankine forward or another premium defender and start Holmes as a mid.
True, Rankine is a decent suggestion, you'd back him to be a top 6 forward.
(https://i.imgur.com/JfnQJod.png)
Going for the quick cash grab perhaps? That's all Short was for, could this speed things up a bit with the upgrades.
(https://i.imgur.com/9pVP3is.png)
Probably better to shift the GWS risk to the forward line, this team perhaps better balanced than the last one.
I like both, prefer second due to two rooks in DEF on field in the first. I think we are splitting hairs now, have all players with upside value and proven record, have the pick of the rooks. Just can't have them all so we keep juggling, both those teams look great, and it really is a coin toss on Day, Callaghan, W Ashcroft.
I think Zorko outscores Rankine in the front half of the season.
Stone on half back has better JS than Leake in the midfield. Allegedly.
I think with a view to setting up correction trades the strong defence is the best and easiest to fix. If Reid or Trainor falters then Leake can be traded in, pretty simple transaction. Having all 4 of the cheap rookies might force ones hand into a complete restructure costing 2 trades. Stone could also become Hall or Erasmus if need be.
Probably time to just sit tight and wait for the team sheets, the only question mark is Hewett but I'm even inclined to keep him for a floating donut, so this is probably the final cut.
Yeah I think the second team is the better one to sit on until team sheets come out.
Quote from: arbel on March 11, 2025, 03:16:53 PMYeah I think the second team is the better one to sit on until team sheets come out.
Agreed on 2nd team. Great structure..love the Callaghan pick.. that lad is a jet.
Hollands is out indefinitely which makes me feel better about Lucas Campo's JS.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 12, 2025, 02:11:26 AMHollands is out indefinitely which makes me feel better about Lucas Campo's JS.
I read that, I felt the same way too. I also like seeing the name Camporeale, it's a name I feel I can trust.
Hewett quad injury, I'm still tempted to hold.
Quote from: Bully on March 12, 2025, 01:36:17 PMHewett quad injury, I'm still tempted to hold.
So he's out for start of season? As in won't play round one?
I reckon he's a must have but there might be a dropped rook we have to get off who can go to him when he returns, reckon he's a must Hewett but probably won't pick him if he's a confirmed out. if he's two or three rounds away Stone might be ripe by then or out when all the suspended lads are back?
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 12, 2025, 06:15:32 PMQuote from: Bully on March 12, 2025, 01:36:17 PMHewett quad injury, I'm still tempted to hold.
So he's out for start of season? As in won't play round one?
I reckon he's a must have but there might be a dropped rook we have to get off who can go to him when he returns, reckon he's a must Hewett but probably won't pick him if he's a confirmed out. if he's two or three rounds away Stone might be ripe by then or out when all the suspended lads are back?
Apparently only a one weeker, perfect for looping this week, I personally don't want to restructure for Kako but I can see the merits in doing so.
the hype on hewett is massive one weeker i reckon is worth the risk and a handy looper, when all your giving up is a basement priced rook you may be right to put him in.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 12, 2025, 07:26:36 PMthe hype on hewett is massive one weeker i reckon is worth the risk and a handy looper, when all your giving up is a basement priced rook you may be right to put him in.
Can always default to Hall if he's longer, but the word is he's on the cusp this week but they want to be cautious, he's also coming back from stress fractures in the foot so I can understand the reluctance. I think having him could be a good POD if he does indeed spend time in the midfield, I think his scoring potential is better than Kako for instance. 55% ownership last time I checked, that will surely come right down.
I currently don't have a loop, so Hewett would make the most sense with his DPP, but the other thing is quads can linger and does he get a vest or two to ease him in?
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 12, 2025, 10:38:37 PMI currently don't have a loop, so Hewett would make the most sense with his DPP, but the other thing is quads can linger and does he get a vest or two to ease him in?
He may get the vest I suppose, he'll potentially be a slower burn but he's best 22 with midfield upside. As long as you aren't fielding him I reckon it's a well weighted risk. Hall is the other budget priced option, Erasmus probably a bigger vest candidate than Hewett.
Quote from: Bully on March 12, 2025, 11:20:30 PMHe may get the vest I suppose, he'll potentially be a slower burn but he's best 22 with midfield upside. As long as you aren't fielding him I reckon it's a well weighted risk. Hall is the other budget priced option, Erasmus probably a bigger vest candidate than Hewett.
I think I'll avoid all 3 to start the season and Hewett is the one to bring in once he starts getting games as a downgrade. We have a lot of choices for that M11 spot.
I'm looking at rucks right now, what are your thoughts on Nank? He seems like a name no one brings up but he managed to average 110 last year and has a big ceiling.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 12, 2025, 11:55:58 PMQuote from: Bully on March 12, 2025, 11:20:30 PMHe may get the vest I suppose, he'll potentially be a slower burn but he's best 22 with midfield upside. As long as you aren't fielding him I reckon it's a well weighted risk. Hall is the other budget priced option, Erasmus probably a bigger vest candidate than Hewett.
I think I'll avoid all 3 to start the season and Hewett is the one to bring in once he starts getting games as a downgrade. We have a lot of choices for that M11 spot.
I'm looking at rucks right now, what are your thoughts on Nank? He seems like a name no one brings up but he managed to average 110 last year and has a big ceiling.
But he's also a year older and in the middle of a rebuild, I'd just play it safe with one of Gawn, Xerri or De Koning.
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2025, 12:05:08 AMBut he's also a year older and in the middle of a rebuild, I'd just play it safe with one of Gawn, Xerri or De Koning.
He's only 30 and the Tigers were horrendous last year yet he still scored 110.
I'm not going near Xerri to start the year. Gawn is also at the age rucks tend to drop off significantly, but he is the one I'd take the risk with out of those two. TDK is the lock
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 13, 2025, 12:50:55 AMQuote from: Bully on March 13, 2025, 12:05:08 AMBut he's also a year older and in the middle of a rebuild, I'd just play it safe with one of Gawn, Xerri or De Koning.
He's only 30 and the Tigers were horrendous last year yet he still scored 110.
I'm not going near Xerri to start the year. Gawn is also at the age rucks tend to drop off significantly, but he is the one I'd take the risk with out of those two. TDK is the lock
For most objective observers Nank didn't have a good year in 2024, whilst he scored ok in Supercoach he struggled to exert any major influence on matches.
I'm contemplating Blight again.... Prior Rook for D5 and D6 is unsettling, not sure I'm willing to give up parker/sanders for him though.
Apparently, he was a gun interceptor in the lower levels. Going to be a busy boy down back this season...
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 13, 2025, 05:27:56 PMI'm contemplating Blight again.... Prior Rook for D5 and D6 is unsettling, not sure I'm willing to give up parker/sanders for him though.
Apparently, he was a gun interceptor in the lower levels. Going to be a busy boy down back this season...
He's pretty raw, I didn't think he looked overly polished in the practice games but I suspect he'll get a decent run in the seniors.
(https://i.imgur.com/ztATMpe.png)
Ashcroft as starting sub will stunt his cash generation, I think Knevitt might be the go or even Kako.
I've gone same mid rooks as you exactly except I have one less which is O'driscoll. I can afford him over Hewett but it leaves me $1200 in the bank which makes rookie corrections extremely difficult.
Figure I'd rather take the punt on Hewett's soreness over Ashcrofts vestiness.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 13, 2025, 06:15:42 PMI've gone same mid rooks as you exactly except I have one less which is O'driscoll. I can afford him over Hewett but it leaves me $1200 in the bank which makes rookie corrections extremely difficult.
Figure I'd rather take the punt on Hewett's soreness over Ashcrofts vestiness.
Hewett will come in handy whether he plays or not, I can already see myself swinging Horne-Francis to the mids and fielding Davidson.
Murphy Reid is very tempting also. Seems he has gone past a few at the Dockers.
Hewett is named on the extended bench
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 13, 2025, 06:25:21 PMMurphy Reid is very tempting also. Seems he has gone past a few at the Dockers.
He's all class, just wondering whether he'll get a decent run.
I see Hastie named on the field with all the other rookie Saints on the extended bench. Could this be a sign of job security?
(https://i.imgur.com/t0WBrcD.png)
Green lights for the most part, Stone should make it, can always shuffle Hewett if need be.
If no Boyd Reidy named as Ruck. How long is Hodor out for?
I agree on Hastie out of him and Reidy for Boxshalls spot I think, I'm after JS.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 13, 2025, 06:56:45 PMIf no Boyd Reidy named as Ruck. How long is Hodor out for?
I agree on Hastie out of him and Reidy for Boxshalls spot I think, I'm after JS.
Boyd should make the cut but you never know, I think they said 2-4 weeks for Darcy.
Never saw that coming, amazing win!
Trainor tick
Lalor tick (might need a correction trade)
Armstrong tick
I managed to squeeze in the last quarter and a half. Lalor looks the goods
6 clangers brought Trainors score down. Had him on field.
Now Hall named on the field, no idea who has the best job security so may as well pick the DPP player.
Yeah Hastie was on field but is now on the bench? Hall could be a good option
Quote from: arbel on March 14, 2025, 06:16:41 PMYeah Hastie was on field but is now on the bench? Hall could be a good option
Named on the bench plus has sub history.
Quote from: Bully on March 14, 2025, 06:20:32 PMQuote from: arbel on March 14, 2025, 06:16:41 PMYeah Hastie was on field but is now on the bench? Hall could be a good option
Named on the bench plus has sub history.
Because of the above, after boxshall looked better than both, I've gone Kako.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 14, 2025, 06:43:11 PMQuote from: Bully on March 14, 2025, 06:20:32 PMQuote from: arbel on March 14, 2025, 06:16:41 PMYeah Hastie was on field but is now on the bench? Hall could be a good option
Named on the bench plus has sub history.
Because of the above, after boxshall looked better than both, I've gone Kako.
If you have the coin that's a pretty good idea.
Tsatas looking like a lemon, that's probably 1 trade required.
It's a lemon party tonight
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 14, 2025, 08:29:28 PMIt's a lemon party tonight
I need to find 8k to get Lalor, options are rookie down to Henderson or Holmes to Stewart.
Hopefully you don't have to burn two trades to do it Bully and a cheaper rook presents as a must have over the remaining games, there are quite a few with the potential to do so.
For me it's Tsatas to best of Lalor / O'driscoll.
Prior & Reid diabolical, Reid way off the pace but 7 marks he's got potential. Prior ??????
Kako will be ok if he gets supply. IF.
The only positive to come out of this train wreck tonight is the hope the bombers dish this up on Anzac Day.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 14, 2025, 09:02:43 PMHopefully you don't have to burn two trades to do it Bully and a cheaper rook presents as a must have over the remaining games, there are quite a few with the potential to do so.
For me it's Tsatas to best of Lalor / O'driscoll.
Prior & Reid diabolical, Reid way off the pace but 7 marks he's got potential. Prior ??????
Kako will be ok if he gets supply. IF.
The only positive to come out of this train wreck tonight is the hope the bombers dish this up on Anzac Day.
I could also take Reid instead of Knevitt, I reckon both have dicey job security so may as well go the cheap option. That means Tsatas to Lalor in one clip.
Ridley didn't last very long, I'd say that's about time you declare Supercoach irrelevant.
It's another concussion as well. The knock didn't look huge either which is also a worry
I'm going to make some rookie culls to get Perryman up to Dale, I think the midfield experiment is too unknown, for 111k there's a pretty solid floor which is worth investing in.
Powell-Pepper to Riley Bice via Paton. 67k
O'Sullivan to Kako 50k
Getting Perryman up to Dale 111K
I'll then swing Kako to F6 to replace SPP who was more than putrid.
Thank the Lord for the flex!
I don't even want to look at the scores for some of those guys. What a putrid round
Think not alone with the putrid round, Would you believe in about 6 of my drafts I had Dunkley before settling on Neale. Not a lot of price difference, SPP has got to go can not have those putrid scores.
(https://i.imgur.com/vSXHaHo.png)
Despite the pain of Powell-Pepper I managed to avoid calamity with a solid 2219, Parker still concerns me, I wish he was Rankine, maybe that's my next mission but this week I want to get Perryman off the books, top 6 no chance, maybe he scratches a 100 average, still a big maybe but with Sicily, Stewart & Dale available it seems like an unecessary risk. Of all the mid price players I think Perryman looks to be the biggest trap. Is he a renowned big scorer? Not enough data to make a definitive call, so better make this an urgent upgrade.
Next week Tsatas to Levi Ashcroft almost booked but I want to give it one more week.
That is a pretty awesome result. You nailed your captain choice and it seems like most of the guys you fielded did pretty well.
I may have a plan to get Rankine next week, it involves Roberts to SDK but it will be highly contingent on Roberts score and whether he looks like being a premo defender this year. Less than 80 and he's worth punting, no point carrying over the bye. BE is 22 so it's just a question of how much cash one can make.
Hastie being dropped is certainly a setback and may even delay Rankine for a week or two. Will reassess at the end of the round but Hastie to Henderson might be the go, otherwise I may need to tinker around the edges to get him up to Kako.
How much cash as I did Hastie to Lashcroft when teams came out.
Quote from: Ringo on March 21, 2025, 02:53:47 PMHow much cash as I did Hastie to Lashcroft when teams came out.
I have 1k in the bank but that's ok, Tsatas to Levi was the plan but if Tsatas performs I will look at ways to get the 60k.
Well Flynn is dropped so there's your money :(
Paton also though expected that one after being subbed off
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 21, 2025, 05:39:27 PMWell Flynn is dropped so there's your money :(
Surprised they dropped Flynn after one game?
Quote from: arbel on March 21, 2025, 05:42:04 PMQuote from: Colliwobblers on March 21, 2025, 05:39:27 PMWell Flynn is dropped so there's your money :(
Surprised they dropped Flynn after one game?
Yeah he had his chance, obviously didn't take it in coaches opinion, such a key spot and boyd out those with him probably have to trade him.
Makes those expensive missed rooks an easy get at least.
I may hold SPP and dump Flynn instead
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 21, 2025, 05:49:18 PMI may hold SPP and dump Flynn instead
1207 have traded flynn out, see what that is in another 90 minutes :)
could kick ourselves but kinda DO NOT want a red dot for flex.
(https://i.imgur.com/OIw5jnx.png)
Changes made, keeping Paton for the loop this week, will sort out his replacement out next week.
Get a look at Caleb Smith this week who I was keen on in early researching.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 21, 2025, 06:23:19 PMGet a look at Caleb Smith this week who I was keen on in early researching.
He's a possibility, Bice is the one who has flown under the radar a little, TOG was minimal last week.
Quote from: Bully on March 21, 2025, 06:30:00 PMQuote from: Colliwobblers on March 21, 2025, 06:23:19 PMGet a look at Caleb Smith this week who I was keen on in early researching.
He's a possibility, Bice is the one who has flown under the radar a little, TOG was minimal last week.
I had Bice in for most of the year until he wasn't named R1 and then had vest. He has bye next week so can wait on him
VC Dale looks like a lock, have to take 141, I've put the C on Boyd for now. Davidson also a lock at F6, Paton on field and hopefully not a late inclusion.
Quote from: Bully on March 21, 2025, 10:22:34 PMVC Dale looks like a lock, have to take 141, I've put the C on Boyd for now. Davidson also a lock at F6, Paton on field and hopefully not a late inclusion.
Dale call a brilliant one, gonna have a hard time catching you this season, great start, very smart moves this far.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on March 21, 2025, 10:49:26 PMQuote from: Bully on March 21, 2025, 10:22:34 PMVC Dale looks like a lock, have to take 141, I've put the C on Boyd for now. Davidson also a lock at F6, Paton on field and hopefully not a late inclusion.
Dale call a brilliant one, gonna have a hard time catching you this season, great start, very smart moves this far.
Thanks! I'm especially relieved given Gawn vs Xerri might be a nil all draw.
Looks like Bailey Smith will be a late out, that's my C and loophole for Davidson. Calf injury so 2 weeks probable.
I'm a little annoyed I didn't grab Dale and went with Stewart. Although I may have the cash for Holmes now instead dumping Flynn. I'll need to have a look.
You have to take that VC score though, it's a monster, lock it in. Smith out with a calf will be interesting. The byes say hold, so it may not cost us too much
Nice call on Dale but remember he will not always have 16 kick ins with 1 2. Really showed up the effect of that scoring last night. To me was a 120 game with the extra scoring inflating.
(https://i.imgur.com/cY9xyXz.png)
Another solid week scoring 2021, I now find myself on the cusp of the top 1000 so this week looms as a critical juncture in the road, I have many problems across the board but the two most pressing are Petracca & Horne-Francis, time to cut and run and I can revisit once they shed a little cash. O'Sullivan to Hendersron looks like a nice little cash generator, enough to get Dunkley who is probably the safest bet in a season plagued with taggers. Sinclair has been rushed back in, I now have a link to Holmes which may come in handy down the track. Thought long and hard about Levi Ashcroft but still fear the vest, it's enough to prioritise Dunkley at this stage.
That's a pretty awesome week. I'm in the same boat with Trac but there are good signs. He has butchered the ball the last two weeks and he had a crap ton of uncontested touches vs North. It would make sense to try and capitalise on the price rise from someone else if you were to move him on.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 24, 2025, 01:22:29 AMThat's a pretty awesome week. I'm in the same boat with Trac but there are good signs. He has butchered the ball the last two weeks and he had a crap ton of uncontested touches vs North. It would make sense to try and capitalise on the price rise from someone else if you were to move him on.
Petracca could go sub 500k with another poor score, I think it's better to find a safe haven, the same goes for Horne-Francis who can be picked up cheap in a few weeks, probably a nice easy upgrade of Parker.
Nice score well done. JHF as you say may be picked up cheaper,
Here's what's concerning me about Trac, even before the rib injury he was struggling, too much time share and also increasingly ragged by foot. From round 5 last year up until now he has scored a paltry 2 tons in 10 matches. This 10 match milestone is important, one can't blame injury alone, I can't say with any confidence a turnaround is imminent.
2024 (round 5 - 13)
59, 93, 94, 134, 87, 116, 85, 64* (subbed out)
2025 (round 0 - 1)
98, 78
Average = 90.8
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2025, 10:36:55 AMHere's what's concerning me about Trac, even before the rib injury he was struggling, too much time share and also increasingly ragged by foot. From round 5 last year up until now he has scored a paltry 2 tons in 10 matches. This 10 match milestone is important, one can't blame injury alone, I can't say with any confidence a turnaround is imminent.
2024 (round 5 - 13)
59, 93, 94, 134, 87, 116, 85, 64* (subbed out)
2025 (round 0 - 1)
98, 78
Average = 90.8
I agree with this. I think the difference also between this year and his in-form years when he was getting CBA's is that the team is in a worse position now, which means we will see situations where they move him forward to try and give some form of a threat in the forward line. I picked him, but when you look at the fact that Rozee was there for cheaper and then even saving 110k down to Finn, which I almost did before the dees v GWS game, it hurts. I completely agree in moving on from him and will be this week as well.
Nice score. JHF definitely the concern to take care of with a 158 BE
Quote from: arbel on March 24, 2025, 02:22:47 PMNice score. JHF definitely the concern to take care of with a 158 BE
This needs to be done this week, I'll be sacrificing a rookie on the bubble but next week I'll look at a Hall/Flynn combo so I'll only be missing out on 1 price rise.
Round 3 has always been about rookies but this year seems to be an exception with loads of misfiring premos. My plan for Sheezel is a straight swap with Daicos, hopefully don't need to do it but I'm prepared for a worst case scenario.
I'm less concerned about Gawn, he did this last year and then burnt everyone who dumped him for Grundy. If he does fall off a cliff I may even go straight down to Flynn, but I'm reasonably confident he bounces back.
Tsatas out with a broken finger? Damn, that really has me thinking, I had already factored in a price rise for next week. Could just go straight swap with Ashcroft and hold Petracca 1 more week.
I think hold Trac. The opportunity had been there, he cleans up that disposal and we're laughing. I'd only look at trading him for Callaghan (who you already have) or Rozee if you feel like Rozee will be a top 10 guy.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 24, 2025, 05:10:31 PMI think hold Trac. The opportunity had been there, he cleans up that disposal and we're laughing. I'd only look at trading him for Callaghan (who you already have) or Rozee if you feel like Rozee will be a top 10 guy.
Or Daicos next week, always good to have certainty around prices, I think 80k difference probably the worst case scenario.
(https://i.imgur.com/ntGFt04.png)
Probably best to clean up the dead rookies, Henderson & Curtin not a terrible pairing, another 80+ score from Curtin would be handy. Flynn & Hall the likely targets next week, Daicos the other who will enter the conversation.
Is Flynn even going to come back into the Eagles team? I know they subbed Williams, but Flynn had his ass handed to him by Witts the week prior.
No wonder you're scoring well, team looks great. Curtin a good get. I think Henderson over Ashcroft the right call simply for the boost to the bank balance.
Gawn and Trac two of the proudest footballers out there I'd expect a serious bounce back from both.
Goodwin didn't do Gawn any favours in his press conference either. He brought up some personal issues and essentially said his headspace wasn't right for the game. He should be better this week, although TDK for Gawn could also be a nice cash generator.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 24, 2025, 05:55:20 PMGoodwin didn't do Gawn any favours in his press conference either. He brought up some personal issues and essentially said his headspace wasn't right for the game. He should be better this week, although TDK for Gawn could also be a nice cash generator.
I toyed with that idea but then I remembered last year when Grundy pantsed him, after that game he produced several captain's scores which blew my season apart. I have to at least give him 1 more week, can always sideways to De Koning if need be.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 24, 2025, 05:50:49 PMIs Flynn even going to come back into the Eagles team? I know they subbed Williams, but Flynn had his ass handed to him by Witts the week prior.
Who is better, Flynn or Barnett? Or will they run with a hybrid like Maric?
I'm thinking about contingencies in the event Sheezel & Petracca bomb with such high BE's, fortunately both Neale & Daicos will be affordable correction trades, I may even do those trades regardless. Sheezel looks to be lacking continuity, he could be the one to fall back this year, if he doesn't ton this week he will become Neale who will be around the same price. Petracca also needs a ton, Daicos on standby just in case.
(https://i.imgur.com/iGae484.png)
With the Campo axing I'm trading this week to O'Sullivan, similar BE to Curtin but fractionally cheaper, next week I'll punt Paton but he's handy for the loop this week which gives me a double hit on Hall/Hewett.
Hall dropped and Flynn hasn't been recalled. Moraes if he holds his spot will be the pick of the rookies next week
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 28, 2025, 05:15:29 PMHall dropped and Flynn hasn't been recalled. Moraes if he holds his spot will be the pick of the rookies next week
Maybe I should grab a forward instead, back to Curtin.
(https://i.imgur.com/oronl8P.png)
Solid week scoring 1992 and moved up to 713, that's a nice rank as we near the end of the byes. I'm fixing Lindsay with Moraes, that cash also allows me to grab Rankine for Callaghan, Sheezel also booted for De Koning. I don't see these as sideways trades, I think they look like must-haves at this early stage.
Next week I've got an open mind, maybe the midfield with some sliders like Neale, I think he'll come good eventually, maybe even next week.
That's a damn good week. I agree with the Lindsay to Moraes trade if Lindsay is out a while. If he is a week or test I'd probably hold, he has looked the best chance of generating cash and I'd take the hit while trading out someone like Paton instead (if he isn't named).
I'm also a little worried about Sheezel, although I think I'd move Gawn for TDK instead. They moved Sheezel behind the ball late and I think he is a hold for one more week. Callaghan would have been a cash gen move so I understand moving him on as well.
Quote from: Mat0369 on Yesterday at 12:09:50 AMThat's a damn good week. I agree with the Lindsay to Moraes trade if Lindsay is out a while. If he is a week or test I'd probably hold, he has looked the best chance of generating cash and I'd take the hit while trading out someone like Paton instead (if he isn't named).
I'm also a little worried about Sheezel, although I think I'd move Gawn for TDK instead. They moved Sheezel behind the ball late and I think he is a hold for one more week. Callaghan would have been a cash gen move so I understand moving him on as well.
I think Gawn will be the third best ruck, I think his draw gets better from here. Bad luck to be paying top dollar but no point sideways trading either, definitely better to get De Koning and perhaps even consider Jackson. Four rucks could be lethal, something worth considering next week.
Sheezel might come good but there's too much forward time to assume he'll be a top 6 defender, this week probably the last week to offload for a reasonable price.
Great round and rank. I like the trades a lot. Paton over Lindsay if you can afford and it's a very short term injury.
Cutting the spuds has been paying off so why stop now.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on Yesterday at 08:44:18 AMGreat round and rank. I like the trades a lot. Paton over Lindsay if you can afford and it's a very short term injury.
Cutting the spuds has been paying off so why stop now.
Also bear in mind Lindsay has a 9 in his rolling average, could be a long wait to see any decent return.
Quote from: Bully on Yesterday at 08:57:42 AMQuote from: Colliwobblers on Yesterday at 08:44:18 AMGreat round and rank. I like the trades a lot. Paton over Lindsay if you can afford and it's a very short term injury.
Cutting the spuds has been paying off so why stop now.
Also bear in mind Lindsay has a 9 in his rolling average, could be a long wait to see any decent return.
Yeah, your right, he will have to come back and go 80 plus a couple in a row to generate again, a 40-60 would make for a long road back to profit. BE28 a 50 takes that up into the 60's BE for the next game.
O'Sullivan on the other hand... BE37 not far below his average his trajectory for making money is a flat line.
Quote from: Colliwobblers on Yesterday at 09:04:54 AMQuote from: Bully on Yesterday at 08:57:42 AMQuote from: Colliwobblers on Yesterday at 08:44:18 AMGreat round and rank. I like the trades a lot. Paton over Lindsay if you can afford and it's a very short term injury.
Cutting the spuds has been paying off so why stop now.
Also bear in mind Lindsay has a 9 in his rolling average, could be a long wait to see any decent return.
Yeah, your right, he will have to come back and go 80 plus a couple in a row to generate again, a 40-60 would make for a long road back to profit. BE28 a 50 takes that up into the 60's BE for the next game.
O'Sullivan on the other hand... BE37 not far below his average his trajectory for making money is a flat line.
I feel O'Sullivan has another gear, I'm not against trading but there could be a sleeper performance around the corner. Couple that with DPP and he's a hold for this week, will reassess next week.
I hate the deadwood in my team, made a huge blunder trading Trainor but dems da breaks. I will survive somehow. One possible trade next week might be Tsatas, only 58k needed from Paton, very doable and solves a few problems before we go back to best 22.