I'll get the ball rolling for Round 2.
Joyce or Hore?
Hore
Well this week I had Scott and Drew sitting on the bench so I might get them on field this week
Quote from: quinny88 on March 24, 2019, 11:35:09 PM
Well this week I had Scott and Drew sitting on the bench so I might get them on field this week
Yep me too, both 103's..... Oh well
Pick 2: Scott, Butters, Constable?
Quote from: IntegralX on March 25, 2019, 01:07:04 AM
Pick 2: Scott, Butters, Constable?
Scott who looked great at home vs Lions
and
The Port boys vs Carrrrrlton
Demons will be angry.
Scrimshaw vs Parker? (Can swap Moore/Burgess).
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2019, 04:11:26 PM
Scrimshaw vs Parker? (Can swap Moore/Burgess).
As a Bombers fan I'd be backing Parker in after how we looked in round 1.
Quote from: TommyC on March 24, 2019, 10:35:25 PM
I'll get the ball rolling for Round 2.
Joyce or Hore?
Hore was terrible. You might not have to choose.
Need to work out which 3 to start out of Setterfield, Drew, Constable and Scott.
Benching Setterfield is the obvious choice yeah?
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2019, 04:11:26 PM
Scrimshaw vs Parker? (Can swap Moore/Burgess).
Do not field Scrimshaw in my opinion
Quote from: jfitty on March 26, 2019, 11:56:34 AM
Need to work out which 3 to start out of Setterfield, Drew, Constable and Scott.
Benching Setterfield is the obvious choice yeah?
Nice problem to have, hey? We all underestimated Scott, he looks good enough to start onfield. All four could easily start onfield, just about need a floating donut to loop the one left out.
What's the opinion on Collins as an on-field option?
Obviously it seems an obvious benching in favour of Scrimshaw (or in my case Parker via DPP), but this seems like a classic case of chasing last week's scores, and Collins coming out with an 80 while Parker/Scrim get a 30 odd.. Remember Collins' 93 points in JLT 1 from 12 touches, 3 marks, 5 tackles.
What are people doing with Collins?
Collins vs Parker vs Scrimshaw ?
Quote from: imjusflexin on March 26, 2019, 03:54:02 PM
What's the opinion on Collins as an on-field option?
Obviously it seems an obvious benching in favour of Scrimshaw (or in my case Parker via DPP), but this seems like a classic case of chasing last week's scores, and Collins coming out with an 80 while Parker/Scrim get a 30 odd.. Remember Collins' 93 points in JLT 1 from 12 touches, 3 marks, 5 tackles.
What are people doing with Collins?
Collins vs Parker vs Scrimshaw ?
Decision may be made for you with Collins in doubt for next round due to concussion.
Quote from: Ringo on March 26, 2019, 04:29:51 PM
Quote from: imjusflexin on March 26, 2019, 03:54:02 PM
What's the opinion on Collins as an on-field option?
Obviously it seems an obvious benching in favour of Scrimshaw (or in my case Parker via DPP), but this seems like a classic case of chasing last week's scores, and Collins coming out with an 80 while Parker/Scrim get a 30 odd.. Remember Collins' 93 points in JLT 1 from 12 touches, 3 marks, 5 tackles.
What are people doing with Collins?
Collins vs Parker vs Scrimshaw ?
Decision may be made for you with Collins in doubt for next round due to concussion.
What time of the game did the concussion occur? If he's named could his poor play (lots of dropped marks come to mind) be attributed at all to that?
Who knows. Just don't wanna rage bench him, end up losing 50 points, and then afterwards be kicking myself for not trusting the expensive rookies after 1 game.
Quote from: imjusflexin on March 26, 2019, 04:35:28 PM
What time of the game did the concussion occur? If he's named could his poor play (lots of dropped marks come to mind) be attributed at all to that?
He had a massive collision with Dunstan with literally seconds to go in the game, which I'm fairly sure was the cause.
Quote from: jfitty on March 26, 2019, 11:56:34 AM
Need to work out which 3 to start out of Setterfield, Drew, Constable and Scott.
Benching Setterfield is the obvious choice yeah?
Yeah I'd bench Setterfield. But u need to get both Setterfield and Drew into your fwd line. They look like being the 2 best fwd rookies. Parker was great but won't play the Suns every week.
Can't wait to lose another 170+ points fielding the wrong rookies again this week!
Quote from: GoLions on March 27, 2019, 08:07:24 AM
Can't wait to lose another 170+ points fielding the wrong rookies again this week!
This time, Drew will score poorly against Carlton while Balta gets 100+ in his new intercept defender role.
Quote from: LaHug on March 27, 2019, 08:50:18 AM
Quote from: GoLions on March 27, 2019, 08:07:24 AM
Can't wait to lose another 170+ points fielding the wrong rookies again this week!
This time, Drew will score poorly against Carlton while Balta gets 100+ in his new intercept defender role.
Dw I've already put the vc on Balta and chucked Drew on the bench for Parker
Need to bench 1: Walsh, Constable, Scott
Quote from: barlowlove on March 27, 2019, 09:08:08 AM
Need to bench 1: Walsh, Constable, Scott
It'd take a lot of balls to bench Walsh so I'd bench Constable
In my case, I need to bench two of them because I'm so mid heavy...
Quote from: LaHug on March 27, 2019, 09:13:47 AM
Quote from: barlowlove on March 27, 2019, 09:08:08 AM
Need to bench 1: Walsh, Constable, Scott
It'd take a lot of balls to bench Walsh so I'd bench Constable
In my case, I need to bench two of them because I'm so mid heavy...
If I feel like benching Walsh I’d probably look at trading him out at that price...
Field Setterfield or Parker to cober Greene?
Quote from: YoungGun on March 28, 2019, 08:18:59 AM
Field Setterfield or Parker to cober Greene?
Setters imo
@F6 Burgess or Petruccelli?
Or
Swap Moore with Burgess and field Scrimshaw at D6?
Option 2
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 28, 2019, 07:03:35 PM
@F6 Burgess or Petruccelli?
Or
Swap Moore with Burgess and field Scrimshaw at D6?
Quote from: whynot102 on March 28, 2019, 07:05:55 PM
Option 2 Quote from: Woppa15 on March 28, 2019, 07:03:35 PM
@F6 Burgess or Petruccelli?
Or
Swap Moore with Burgess and field Scrimshaw at D6?
Field scrimshaw
Which 2 to play on the ground out of Walsh, Scott and Constable?
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 29, 2019, 12:34:21 AM
Which 2 to play on the ground out of Walsh, Scott and Constable?
Going Walsh Scott personally
Quote from: _wato on March 29, 2019, 12:38:05 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 29, 2019, 12:34:21 AM
Which 2 to play on the ground out of Walsh, Scott and Constable?
Going Walsh Scott personally
Yeah thinking the same.
The will probably get more time on ground than Constable too.
Last minute calls - Scott or Constable, Keep Duursma or play Collins?
Take duursma or go for Clark, scrimshaw?
Take duursma
70+ from a rookie? Surprised you're even asking
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 30, 2019, 09:04:46 PM
70+ from a rookie? Surprised you're even asking
Q was asked initially at 3QT when Duurs was on 49, and lockout pending for Hore
Quote from: js19 on March 30, 2019, 09:23:14 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 30, 2019, 09:04:46 PM
70+ from a rookie? Surprised you're even asking
Q was asked initially at 3QT when Duurs was on 49, and lockout pending for Hore
Ah right. Hope you left him on field!
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 30, 2019, 09:48:46 PM
Quote from: js19 on March 30, 2019, 09:23:14 PM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 30, 2019, 09:04:46 PM
70+ from a rookie? Surprised you're even asking
Q was asked initially at 3QT when Duurs was on 49, and lockout pending for Hore
Ah right. Hope you left him on field!
Yes, kept him luckily!
Fielded wilkie over scrim. Hope scrim doesnt go to huge. But huge enough so he goes up in price
Quote from: LaHug on March 27, 2019, 08:50:18 AM
Quote from: GoLions on March 27, 2019, 08:07:24 AM
Can't wait to lose another 170+ points fielding the wrong rookies again this week!
This time, Drew will score poorly against Carlton while Balta gets 100+ in his new intercept defender role.
constable, parker, this week scott last week traded in wilkie and still got hore and burgess down back. should have moved moore to def and still would have had wilkie. sucks. looked at rdt and got duursma and constable 100+ on bench :-\ :-\ worry about correct c when wrong rookie is 60pts a game down
Yep kept duursma haha
Hi all. Should I field Duursma or Collins this round?
Quote from: Jalapeno on April 12, 2019, 08:11:18 AM
Hi all. Should I field Duursma or Collins this round?
Duursma imo but I don't have/don't rate collins as an on field option
Quote from: YoungGun on April 12, 2019, 08:36:29 AM
Quote from: Jalapeno on April 12, 2019, 08:11:18 AM
Hi all. Should I field Duursma or Collins this round?
Duursma imo but I don't have/don't rate collins as an on field option
Thanks mate
Bit of a tricky one, unsure which way to go!
Duursma, Schrimshaw or Clark for D5 and D6.
Quote from: Hazza09 on April 12, 2019, 10:42:22 AM
Bit of a tricky one, unsure which way to go!
Duursma, Schrimshaw or Clark for D5 and D6.
Bench Clark vs GWS imo
Quote from: Jalapeno on April 12, 2019, 08:11:18 AM
Hi all. Should I field Duursma or Collins this round?
Collins at home against Carlton. Apart from rnd 1, collins has been good. And Duursma was on light duties this week, so may be playing sore.
Need to field 2 of Drew, Parker, Setterfield.
Quote from: quinny88 on April 12, 2019, 02:55:49 PM
Need to field 2 of Drew, Parker, Setterfield.
Tough one, not too sure myself.
Quote from: Bully on April 12, 2019, 02:58:19 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on April 12, 2019, 02:55:49 PM
Need to field 2 of Drew, Parker, Setterfield.
Tough one, not too sure myself.
I have all three on the field this week, but Setterfield has been the most disappointing.
Quote from: Bully on April 12, 2019, 02:58:19 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on April 12, 2019, 02:55:49 PM
Need to field 2 of Drew, Parker, Setterfield.
Tough one, not too sure myself.
Toss of the coin really, but I think I'll be going Drew and Setters. Surely Setters has a big one...
LDU or Setterfield? :-\
Walsh vs Constable??
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:18:12 PM
Walsh vs Constable??
Both. If ya really can only field one, Walsh.
Quote from: SilverLion on April 12, 2019, 05:20:47 PM
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:18:12 PM
Walsh vs Constable??
Both. If ya really can only field one, Walsh.
Cheers, yeah batting a bit too deep in mids (and down back with better rooks)
Will need a slight restructure for next week I think....
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:18:12 PM
Walsh vs Constable??
How do you get to the point of only being able to have one rookie on the field in the mids?
Quote from: Wanderer on April 12, 2019, 05:25:16 PM
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:18:12 PM
Walsh vs Constable??
How do you get to the point of only being able to have one rookie on the field in the mids?
Haha, midpricers galore...
Macrae, Cripps, Conigs, Brouch, Rocky, Sheed, Libba, Walsh/Constable
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:27:17 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on April 12, 2019, 05:25:16 PM
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:18:12 PM
Walsh vs Constable??
How do you get to the point of only being able to have one rookie on the field in the mids?
Haha, midpricers galore...
Macrae, Cripps, Conigs, Brouch, Rocky, Sheed, Libba, Walsh/Constable
You just need Rocky to fire and you would have a 100% mid price strike rate
Quote from: Wanderer on April 12, 2019, 05:29:01 PM
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:27:17 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on April 12, 2019, 05:25:16 PM
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:18:12 PM
Walsh vs Constable??
How do you get to the point of only being able to have one rookie on the field in the mids?
Haha, midpricers galore...
Macrae, Cripps, Conigs, Brouch, Rocky, Sheed, Libba, Walsh/Constable
You just need Rocky to fire and you would have a 100% mid price strike rate
Yeah, started all but Libba, so pretty happy atm, but it’s a fickle game...
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:31:33 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on April 12, 2019, 05:29:01 PM
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:27:17 PM
Quote from: Wanderer on April 12, 2019, 05:25:16 PM
Quote from: js19 on April 12, 2019, 05:18:12 PM
Walsh vs Constable??
How do you get to the point of only being able to have one rookie on the field in the mids?
Haha, midpricers galore...
Macrae, Cripps, Conigs, Brouch, Rocky, Sheed, Libba, Walsh/Constable
You just need Rocky to fire and you would have a 100% mid price strike rate
Yeah, started all but Libba, so pretty happy atm, but it’s a fickle game...
You are definitely walking on eggshells there, but could pay off in a big way
Hey mods, any change you could change the title of this thread and just get rid of the round so people can use it all season?
It will stop there being new threads made.
Cheers
Setterfield, Petruccelle or burgess
Quote from: backpocket on April 12, 2019, 06:59:44 PM
Setterfield, Petruccelle or burgess
Take a punt on Petrucelle. WC should smash a Fyfeless Freo.
Parker or Petro?
Clark, Collins or Scrimshaw? Starting Duursma and Rozee against Richmond but need to pick which other one I bench
Quote from: Mat0369 on April 12, 2019, 07:22:27 PM
Clark, Collins or Scrimshaw? Starting Duursma and Rozee against Richmond but need to pick which other one I bench
Collins me thinks starting to take those intercept marks with Suns believe it or not having the third best defensive record in the League.
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 12, 2019, 07:10:50 PM
Parker or Petro?
Parker, but flip a coin really.
Quote from: Mat0369 on April 12, 2019, 07:22:27 PM
Clark, Collins or Scrimshaw? Starting Duursma and Rozee against Richmond but need to pick which other one I bench
Collins has the biggest ceiling, would probably go him against Carlton. Can't wrong with any really, 20 points difference at most between the 3 imo.
Quote from: Mat0369 on April 12, 2019, 07:22:27 PM
Clark, Collins or Scrimshaw? Starting Duursma and Rozee against Richmond but need to pick which other one I bench
Bench Clark.
I had Scrimshaw on field against the Saints before I looked again and remembered Collins is playing us. We tend to just kick and hope for the best. Big H is turning into a contested mark machine but he should get on the end of a few bombs to no one
Atkins v Gi bins :'( (vc Grundy ;D) or go a week early o stack an hope he semi repeats last week?
Quote from: Thewizz71 on April 13, 2019, 09:11:44 AM
Atkins v Gi bins :'( (vc Grundy ;D) or go a week early o stack an hope he semi repeats last week?
Loop Atkins and trade Gibbons to Stack if he doesn't imo
scrimshaw v Clark?
Take Atkins 68 (via Scott) or leave Butters on the field?
I've stuffed up by putting the captain on fyfe instead of greene to take grundy's VC score. So I now have this choice:
Take Grundy's captain score and also take Butter's 24
Or make Cripps captain and field Gibbons
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on April 13, 2019, 07:12:21 PM
I've stuffed up by putting the captain on fyfe instead of greene to take grundy's VC score. So I now have this choice:
Take Grundy's captain score and also take Butter's 24
Or make Cripps captain and field Gibbons
I’ve got the same thing but with Setters. Think I will just cop the 24 off butters and keep Grundy’s score
Quote from: tkringle on April 13, 2019, 07:18:08 PM
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on April 13, 2019, 07:12:21 PM
I've stuffed up by putting the captain on fyfe instead of greene to take grundy's VC score. So I now have this choice:
Take Grundy's captain score and also take Butter's 24
Or make Cripps captain and field Gibbons
I’ve got the same thing but with Setters. Think I will just cop the 24 off butters and keep Grundy’s score
If other choice is Gibbons, I'd just take Grundy. If Setters...maybe Crippa?
Quote from: Samsturmfels on April 13, 2019, 01:29:11 PM
scrimshaw v Clark?
Hopefully Scrim does much better than Clark.
Loopholed Constable and Butters, "might get a leg up on most if constable flops"
Nek minnut. Butters 23 fmsc
Going to have a tricky decision to make this week, need to field 2 out of:
Hore, Collins, Wilkie and Clark.
Leaning towards Hore and Collins, but feel Collins might have a tougher game against the Crows..
Assuming all are named...
1 of Rotham/Clark/Hore
and
1 of Atkins/Scott/Gibbons
My gut tells me Rotham and Atkins.
Quote from: jfitty on April 16, 2019, 09:41:30 AM
Going to have a tricky decision to make this week, need to field 2 out of:
Hore, Collins, Wilkie and Clark.
Leaning towards Hore and Collins, but feel Collins might have a tougher game against the Crows..
Hore for sure against the St Kilda defence but other one is tougher. Would still go Collins but can see your concern.
Quote from: IntegralX on April 17, 2019, 01:17:44 AM
Assuming all are named...
1 of Rotham/Clark/Hore
and
1 of Atkins/Scott/Gibbons
My gut tells me Rotham and Atkins.
I'd go Hore over Rotham. I know Richmond had a lot of intercept marks over the weekend but I think that was the exception, not the rule. I'd back Hore against St Kilda's forwards over Rotham against Port's...
Wilkie v Clark
Quote from: _wato on April 17, 2019, 10:26:28 AM
Wilkie v Clark
Team selection might help you out as Clark could be dropped.
Will be fielding anyone with a pulse at this rate..
Quote from: tkringle on April 17, 2019, 10:46:00 AM
Will be fielding anyone with a pulse at this rate..
;D
Scrimshaw v Hore
Anyone else nervous about having no forward bench with Heeney in doubt?
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 18, 2019, 08:51:51 AM
Anyone else nervous about having no forward bench with Heeney in doubt?
Yes and it might stop me getting ROB considering I already have Setters and Greene.....
After my trades I still have Burgess on fwd bench with E so if Heeney misses I guess getting his 30 is better than a donut, slightly lol
Wouldn't be surprised if Burgess got dropped too leaving me stuffed, but hopefully Dew keeps things unchanged coming off a win
I'm thinking it's worth copping a potential donut (considering my other trade options would only get me Burgess forward anyway) to get ROB in SC
If Moore doesn’t play, I will be forced to field both, Burgess and Petrol. Yuk! :-\
Quote from: no eye deer on April 18, 2019, 09:42:06 AM
If Moore doesn’t play, I will be forced to field both, Burgess and Petrol. Yuk! :-\
He's playing though... Tonight's teams are already named.
Quote from: LaHug on April 18, 2019, 09:43:29 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 18, 2019, 09:42:06 AM
If Moore doesn’t play, I will be forced to field both, Burgess and Petrol. Yuk! :-\
He's playing though... Tonight's teams are already named.
Can still be a late out....fingers crossed that doesn't happen
Quote from: tommy10 on April 18, 2019, 12:33:04 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 18, 2019, 09:43:29 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 18, 2019, 09:42:06 AM
If Moore doesn’t play, I will be forced to field both, Burgess and Petrol. Yuk! :-\
He's playing though... Tonight's teams are already named.
Can still be a late out....fingers crossed that doesn't happen
Yep, got the fingers crossed!
Quote from: no eye deer on April 18, 2019, 01:42:11 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on April 18, 2019, 12:33:04 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 18, 2019, 09:43:29 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 18, 2019, 09:42:06 AM
If Moore doesn’t play, I will be forced to field both, Burgess and Petrol. Yuk! :-\
He's playing though... Tonight's teams are already named.
Can still be a late out....fingers crossed that doesn't happen
Yep, got the fingers crossed!
Did people read the article?
Buckley said they would consider resting Moore and Elliot to manage there workloads throughout the season. He didn’t even hint that it would be anytime soon.
Pick 2 - Collins, Scrimshaw, Hore, Rotham
Pick 1 - Dursma, Atkins, Scott
Pick 1 - Parker, Balta.. will field both if Heeney is out, yuck.
Quote from: dmac07 on April 18, 2019, 01:53:41 PM
Pick 2 - Collins, Scrimshaw, Hore, Rotham
Pick 1 - Dursma, Atkins, Scott
Pick 1 - Parker, Balta.. will field both if Heeney is out, yuck.
Scrimshaw, Hore
Duursma
Parker (not confident he will play)
Quote from: dmac07 on April 18, 2019, 01:53:41 PM
Pick 2 - Collins, Scrimshaw, Hore, Rotham
Pick 1 - Dursma, Atkins, Scott
Pick 1 - Parker, Balta.. will field both if Heeney is out, yuck.
Collins, Scrimshaw
Dursma
Parker
Quote from: no eye deer on April 18, 2019, 01:56:12 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on April 18, 2019, 01:53:41 PM
Pick 2 - Collins, Scrimshaw, Hore, Rotham
Pick 1 - Dursma, Atkins, Scott
Pick 1 - Parker, Balta.. will field both if Heeney is out, yuck.
Scrimshaw, Hore
Duursma
Parker (not confident he will play)
+1
Scrimshaw v Hore
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 18, 2019, 03:45:08 PM
Scrimshaw v Hore
Toss of a coin but would back in Scrimshaw.
Duursma v Hore. Thinking Hore as Port play the Eagles in Perth so not sure Duursma will get much of the ball.
2 of hore, wilkie, Clark
Wilkie/Duursma/Clark for D6?
Butters/Scott/Atkins for M8?
Quote from: walloo44 on April 18, 2019, 06:01:07 PM
2 of hore, wilkie, Clark
bench Clark
Quote from: Ingram on April 18, 2019, 06:33:48 PM
Wilkie/Duursma/Clark for D6?
Butters/Scott/Atkins for M8?
Duurs D6
goodluck with m8, maybe Atkins
moore or hore
2 of scrimshaw, hore, clark, duursma
1 of scott, constable, butters
cheers gents
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 18, 2019, 07:34:32 PM
2 of scrimshaw, hore, clark, duursma
1 of scott, constable, butters
cheers gents
Constable
Butters/Scott/Atkins for M8?
Duursma or Hore for d6? Got Clark as well but think he gets dropped
Quote from: tommy10 on April 18, 2019, 11:05:04 PM
Butters/Scott/Atkins for M8?
Same question for me. I won't field Atkins. I've got Scott now but considering switching to Butters.
With constable out who do i put in??
Butters/Scott or stack?
Quote from: Keeper27 on April 19, 2019, 12:19:40 PM
With constable out who do i put in??
Butters/Scott or stack?
Use Constable to loophole Scott against Stack I think.
Quote from: LaHug on April 19, 2019, 12:35:47 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on April 19, 2019, 12:19:40 PM
With constable out who do i put in??
Butters/Scott or stack?
Use Constable to loophole Scott against Stack I think.
Constable a confirmed out?
Just read that he may be "managed" this week but not that he was a definite out
I have Constable, Stack Scott, Atkins and Gibbons (Just traded Setterfield ==> Stack)
Not sure how to play these rooks ... any thoughts out there - need two on the field (Walsh is M6 for this week)
I left Constable on field and put the E on Scott. If Scott went well (doubtful looking at the current scores) i wouls take his score if not i now have the decision who to field out of Butters and Atkins hmm
Quote from: Commander on April 19, 2019, 06:39:48 PM
I left Constable on field and put the E on Scott. If Scott went well (doubtful looking at the current scores) i wouls take his score if not i now have the decision who to field out of Butters and Atkins hmm
Did the same thing. I think I’ll roll with Butters
Take Scott’s 41 or go Gibbons?
Quote from: tkringle on April 19, 2019, 07:23:32 PM
Take Scott’s 41 or go Gibbons?
Go Gibbons. Whats the worst case, he scores 25 and ya lose 16? Best case he goes 70-90 and ya gain 30-40.
Is it confirmed Constable is out?
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 19, 2019, 07:19:12 PM
Quote from: Commander on April 19, 2019, 06:39:48 PM
I left Constable on field and put the E on Scott. If Scott went well (doubtful looking at the current scores) i wouls take his score if not i now have the decision who to field out of Butters and Atkins hmm
Did the same thing. I think I’ll roll with Butters
i'm actually leaning more towards Atkins atm purely for the fact the weather here in Perth atm is rather shieet! Something to consider
Constable not 100% confirmed out but pretty much 99% assured.
https://www.afl.com.au/news/2019-04-19/rising-star-nominee-to-miss-easter-monday-blockbuster
With my trades this week only have 1 on field forward rookie. In SC had either Drew or Petrucelle. Went Drew (105 v 100).
In DT had to field 2. Put Drew on field and loopholed Petrucelle. Worked out well.
Now need to figure out who to field for Constable. Either Wagner or Atkins. Had the E on Scott yesterday.
Next weeks reading should be worth a laugh after this weeks disaster, can’t wait. :)
Quote from: SilverLion on April 19, 2019, 07:24:12 PM
Quote from: tkringle on April 19, 2019, 07:23:32 PM
Take Scott’s 41 or go Gibbons?
Go Gibbons. Whats the worst case, he scores 25 and ya lose 16? Best case he goes 70-90 and ya gain 30-40.
Good advice SL. Hope you acted on it tkringle. Unfortunately didn’t have the E on Gibbons but hoping Atkins gets a 70.
Went wth Atkins instead of Gibbons after decinding against Scotts 41.
Would be happy if Atkins gets withing just 30 points of Gibbons now!
Quote from: dmac07 on April 22, 2019, 10:45:36 AM
Went wth Atkins instead of Gibbons after decinding against Scotts 41.
Would be happy if Atkins gets withing just 30 points of Gibbons now!
Me too.
Quote from: tommy10 on April 21, 2019, 09:38:35 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on April 19, 2019, 07:24:12 PM
Quote from: tkringle on April 19, 2019, 07:23:32 PM
Take Scott’s 41 or go Gibbons?
Go Gibbons. Whats the worst case, he scores 25 and ya lose 16? Best case he goes 70-90 and ya gain 30-40.
Good advice SL. Hope you acted on it tkringle. Unfortunately didn’t have the E on Gibbons but hoping Atkins gets a 70.
I ended up trading Butters to Hore. It meant Duursma could be my starting mid so was a mute point in the end
Quote from: Thewizz71 on April 22, 2019, 12:33:30 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on April 22, 2019, 10:45:36 AM
Went wth Atkins instead of Gibbons after decinding against Scotts 41.
Would be happy if Atkins gets withing just 30 points of Gibbons now!
Me too.
+3
Play Ross or Butters?
Ridley v Duursma
Parker or Petruccelle?
Quote from: TomK on April 24, 2019, 10:49:14 PM
Parker or Petruccelle?
I think Parker. Gonna be tough for Petrol at the Cattery.
Wilkie or Scrimshaw? :-\
Do I swing Burgess to Defense and hope he gets dropped to get Hores score or do I leave moore in defense and play Drew up front. Only thing is if Burgess doesnt get dropped id have to field him as Hore/Lockhart on bench.
butters vs contstable
I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch. ;D
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:47:13 PM
I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch. ;D
I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha
Quote from: TomK on April 24, 2019, 10:49:14 PM
Parker or Petruccelle?
Petru has sown the seeds of doubt. Before last week, it would be Parker all the way and probably still is.
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 03:48:50 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:47:13 PM
I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch. ;D
I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha
So you reckon Collins is the go?
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:58:41 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 03:48:50 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:47:13 PM
I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch. ;D
I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha
So you reckon Collins is the go?
Its a tough one. I cant see Duursma pulling a 40 or anything, but i think Collins has the scope to go much larger, especially this week. Duursma the safe bet.
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 04:16:04 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:58:41 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 03:48:50 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:47:13 PM
I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch. ;D
I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha
So you reckon Collins is the go?
Its a tough one. I cant see Duursma pulling a 40 or anything, but i think Collins has the scope to go much larger, especially this week. Duursma the safe bet.
Hmmm, I'm stumped on this one, probably should go for upside I guess, Collins it is.
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 25, 2019, 01:53:04 AM
Wilkie or Scrimshaw? :-\
tough one, leaning towards Scrim.
Quote from: frenzy on April 26, 2019, 05:47:39 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 25, 2019, 01:53:04 AM
Wilkie or Scrimshaw? :-\
tough one, leaning towards Scrim.
I've got the same decision. Reckon I'm 55/45 to Wilkie
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 26, 2019, 03:44:27 PM
butters vs contstable
+1.
I think I will go with The Constable given his average and him having had a rest however his opposition is tougher.
Plus a higher high and a higher low
Quote from: tor01doc on April 26, 2019, 06:24:49 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 26, 2019, 03:44:27 PM
butters vs contstable
+1.
I think I will go with The Constable given his average and him having had a rest however his opposition is tougher.
Plus a higher high and a higher low
Looping Butters with Setterfield on the mids bench. Will need at least 90 for me to not play Constable I reckon.
LDU vs Duursma?
Can you loophole Duursma at all using someone? I think Duursma gives you at least 70 tonight, LDU has shown he can go larger
Quote from: Mat0369 on April 26, 2019, 08:33:44 PM
Can you loophole Duursma at all using someone? I think Duursma gives you at least 70 tonight, LDU has shown he can go larger
Nah unfortunately not, only got Bailey Scott not playing who plays in the same game. Think I'll just play it 'safe' with Duursma...
Drew got 65ish tonight and I’m able to loophole him with Petrucelle. May as well... hopefully The Cult Hero doesn’t spud it up.
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 04:42:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 04:16:04 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:58:41 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 03:48:50 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:47:13 PM
I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch. ;D
I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha
So you reckon Collins is the go?
Its a tough one. I cant see Duursma pulling a 40 or anything, but i think Collins has the scope to go much larger, especially this week. Duursma the safe bet.
Hmmm, I'm stumped on this one, probably should go for upside I guess, Collins it is.
84 for Duursma, reckon I've bungled this.
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 04:42:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 04:16:04 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:58:41 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 03:48:50 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:47:13 PM
I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch. ;D
I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha
So you reckon Collins is the go?
Its a tough one. I cant see Duursma pulling a 40 or anything, but i think Collins has the scope to go much larger, especially this week. Duursma the safe bet.
Hmmm, I'm stumped on this one, probably should go for upside I guess, Collins it is.
84 for Duursma, reckon I've bungled this.
I expect Collins to get about that so shouldn’t be a major difference
Quote from: tkringle on April 27, 2019, 12:00:47 AM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 04:42:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 04:16:04 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:58:41 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 26, 2019, 03:48:50 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 26, 2019, 03:47:13 PM
I've been tossing up bewteen Duursma & Collins all week but have decided to go Duursma. My reasoning? It makes tonight's game more interesting to watch. ;D
I traded Collins but expecting him to clean up against our long bombs inside 50 aha
So you reckon Collins is the go?
Its a tough one. I cant see Duursma pulling a 40 or anything, but i think Collins has the scope to go much larger, especially this week. Duursma the safe bet.
Hmmm, I'm stumped on this one, probably should go for upside I guess, Collins it is.
84 for Duursma, reckon I've bungled this.
I expect Collins to get about that so shouldn’t be a major difference
Just as long as he doesn't throw up a 30, that would knock the mojo out of me.
Quote from: Money Shot on April 26, 2019, 11:50:09 PM
Drew got 65ish tonight and I’m able to loophole him with Petrucelle. May as well... hopefully The Cult Hero doesn’t spud it up.
Pet has only gotten more than Drew’s score once out of 5 attempts. Might stick with Drew’s 62. Especially against the Cats in Geelong.
Quote from: tkringle on April 27, 2019, 12:06:46 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on April 26, 2019, 11:50:09 PM
Drew got 65ish tonight and I’m able to loophole him with Petrucelle. May as well... hopefully The Cult Hero doesn’t spud it up.
Pet has only gotten more than Drew’s score once out of 5 attempts. Might stick with Drew’s 62. Especially against the Cats in Geelong.
Had the same decision with Bines C to take Gawns VC. Opted for e on Drew whilst not happy with Drews 62 at least he will still increase in value given his -16 B/e, There will not be a real loss of points even Petra shines.
wilkie v scrimshaw
Quote from: Samsturmfels on April 27, 2019, 05:41:17 PM
wilkie v scrimshaw
Tough one but I’d back in scrimshaw against the Blues.
Take 63 or play Petruccelle?
Quote from: Carn on April 28, 2019, 12:50:52 AM
Take 63 or play Petruccelle?
63, without a doubt, Pet will find it tough against Geelong.
Always take 60+ from rookies.
My cash league is very close got afew headaches atm
1.Take Fyfe score of 128 for C or back in Cripps
2.Take Collins 66 or play Scrimshaw
3.Take Parker 63 or play either Gibbons or Atkins
Some feedback would be great. I think if i go with Fyfe Collins and Parker i would need Petruccelle to score under 34 to win my cash league
Quote from: david17 on April 28, 2019, 12:16:51 PM
My cash league is very close got afew headaches atm
1.Take Fyfe score of 128 for C or back in Cripps
2.Take Collins 66 or play Scrimshaw
3.Take Parker 63 or play either Gibbons or Atkins
Some feedback would be great. I think if i go with Fyfe Collins and Parker i would need Petruccelle to score under 34 to win my cash league
Take Fyfe, Collins and Parker's scores.
120+ for C, 60+ for Rookies. If you really need to take one of the others as a risk, I'd be backing Cripps over Fyfe as the best chance for more points.
have the dilemma of having to field one of Petrucelle or my 'premo' in darling, will probs end up going darling. i just hope he can recover from his of 9 last week
Opponent 258 points vs my Worpel and Kelly
I can create another difference by playing Gibbons over Constable.
Would you do it?
Quote from: LordSneeze on April 28, 2019, 02:38:22 PM
Opponent 258 points vs my Worpel and Kelly
I can create another difference by playing Gibbons over Constable.
Would you do it?
yeah id do it if your that keen on beating your opponent. I can see worpel and kelly going 200-220 points. With setterfield out (didnt watch last weeks game) hopefully gibbons continues to get more opportunities and can score well again.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on April 28, 2019, 02:42:59 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on April 28, 2019, 02:38:22 PM
Opponent 258 points vs my Worpel and Kelly
I can create another difference by playing Gibbons over Constable.
Would you do it?
yeah id do it if your that keen on beating your opponent. I can see worpel and kelly going 200-220 points. With setterfield out (didnt watch last weeks game) hopefully gibbons continues to get more opportunities and can score well again.
My thinking was there is no harm in doing it without Id say I was 10% chance to win. If i can gain 20-30 points it might jump up to 50%
Constable coming off a rest week, no idea what to expect. Prob 60-80
Gibbons off a season best game where he was played more wing than the rest of the year and got a goal. Hopeful confidence grows and can hit the scoreboard more
Also added Rotham on field and Scrim as E incase of a late out. Seems to have been a few this week
Quote from: LordSneeze on April 28, 2019, 03:24:20 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on April 28, 2019, 02:42:59 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on April 28, 2019, 02:38:22 PM
Opponent 258 points vs my Worpel and Kelly
I can create another difference by playing Gibbons over Constable.
Would you do it?
yeah id do it if your that keen on beating your opponent. I can see worpel and kelly going 200-220 points. With setterfield out (didnt watch last weeks game) hopefully gibbons continues to get more opportunities and can score well again.
My thinking was there is no harm in doing it without Id say I was 10% chance to win. If i can gain 20-30 points it might jump up to 50%
Constable coming off a rest week, no idea what to expect. Prob 60-80
Gibbons off a season best game where he was played more wing than the rest of the year and got a goal. Hopeful confidence grows and can hit the scoreboard more
Also added Rotham on field and Scrim as E incase of a late out. Seems to have been a few this week
not looking good atm
One for this round:
Sam Collins vs Eagles
OR
Setterfield vs North
Quote from: imjusflexin on May 02, 2019, 10:06:19 PM
One for this round:
Sam Collins vs Eagles
OR
Setterfield vs North
Collins I reckon.
I can’t decide between Clark and Petrucelle
Quote from: imjusflexin on May 02, 2019, 10:06:19 PM
One for this round:
Sam Collins vs Eagles
OR
Setterfield vs North
Setterfield
Quote from: RoughRed on May 02, 2019, 10:49:34 PM
Quote from: imjusflexin on May 02, 2019, 10:06:19 PM
One for this round:
Sam Collins vs Eagles
OR
Setterfield vs North
Setterfield
Quote from: Maca24 on May 02, 2019, 10:41:50 PM
Quote from: imjusflexin on May 02, 2019, 10:06:19 PM
One for this round:
Sam Collins vs Eagles
OR
Setterfield vs North
Collins I reckon.
I can’t decide between Clark and Petrucelle
Collfield?
Take duursma 68 or field wilkie?
Quote from: sammy123 on May 04, 2019, 08:34:07 AM
Take duursma 68 or field wilkie?
I’d take the 68
Stack or Hayes?
gibbons v atkins
Quote from: Samsturmfels on May 05, 2019, 12:42:35 AM
gibbons v atkins
Toss a coin?
I'd probably give Gibbons a go, seems he's shown he can go big. Atkins has 68 as a top
Not overly happy with Ross 69.... do I take it or give Atkins a go?
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 05, 2019, 12:51:34 AM
Not overly happy with Ross 69.... do I take it or give Atkins a go?
Again, Atkins' top score is 68, so I'd take the 69 every time (unless it's a Hail Mary for a league win)
Quote from: js19 on May 05, 2019, 12:59:20 AM
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 05, 2019, 12:51:34 AM
Not overly happy with Ross 69.... do I take it or give Atkins a go?
Again, Atkins' top score is 68, so I'd take the 69 every time (unless it's a Hail Mary for a league win)
Could be looking like that if Cripps has a shocker!
Quote from: js19 on May 05, 2019, 12:50:12 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on May 05, 2019, 12:42:35 AM
gibbons v atkins
Toss a coin?
I'd probably give Gibbons a go, seems he's shown he can go big. Atkins has 68 as a top
I've got this choice too seeing that Hayes only scored the 49 with the E. Reckon it's squabbling over minimal points but I'm maybe going Atkins based on being more consistent around the 50/60 mark... Gibbons could score 30 as well. Haha. Will have to upgrade my M8 soon if it is coming down to fielding one of Atkins/Gibbons/Hayes/Scott. Will take the pain this week and next but that's it!
Quote from: enzedder on May 05, 2019, 08:08:33 AM
Quote from: js19 on May 05, 2019, 12:50:12 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on May 05, 2019, 12:42:35 AM
gibbons v atkins
Toss a coin?
I'd probably give Gibbons a go, seems he's shown he can go big. Atkins has 68 as a top
I've got this choice too seeing that Hayes only scored the 49 with the E. Reckon it's squabbling over minimal points but I'm maybe going Atkins based on being more consistent around the 50/60 mark... Gibbons could score 30 as well. Haha. Will have to upgrade my M8 soon if it is coming down to fielding one of Atkins/Gibbons/Hayes/Scott. Will take the pain this week and next but that's it!
Would have taken 60+ from Hayes but didn't quite get there, rolling the dice on Gibbons given he has a ton to his name, hopefully gets a decent run on the ball.
Went with Gibbons over Atkins
Of course Atkins is on track for a career best score
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on May 05, 2019, 05:50:02 PM
Went with Gibbons over Atkins
Of course Atkins is on track for a career best score
Yeah same, Gibbons did nothing in the last
Two of Atkins, Gibbons, Answerth and Hayes. Can loophole Atkins, (Scott) but the other three play at the same time.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 10, 2019, 10:13:39 AM
Two of Atkins, Gibbons, Answerth and Hayes. Can loophole Atkins, (Scott) but the other three play at the same time.
Atkins and Answerth
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2019, 10:48:05 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 10, 2019, 10:13:39 AM
Two of Atkins, Gibbons, Answerth and Hayes. Can loophole Atkins, (Scott) but the other three play at the same time.
Atkins and Answerth
Gibbons v Answerth v Hayes for me. Need to field 1.
Leaning towards Answerth.
Baker or Drew to fill the hole when Danger misses.
Quote from: frenzy on May 10, 2019, 03:08:34 PM
Baker or Drew to fill the hole when Danger misses.
Drew ... IMO baker may struggle against Freo defence
Quote from: Thewizz71 on May 10, 2019, 10:53:19 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2019, 10:48:05 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 10, 2019, 10:13:39 AM
Two of Atkins, Gibbons, Answerth and Hayes. Can loophole Atkins, (Scott) but the other three play at the same time.
Atkins and Answerth
Gibbons v Answerth v Hayes for me. Need to field 1.
Leaning towards Answerth.
Yep I think Answerth too.
Setterfield vs Hayes?
Its only for an emergancy but I can loophole one and take Ross off if I get a decent score.
Parker or Corbett?
Quote from: Carn on May 10, 2019, 08:48:02 PM
Parker or Corbett?
Parker.
Answerth or Lockhart? need to field one of them with Whitfield out
Quote from: Carn on May 10, 2019, 08:48:02 PM
Parker or Corbett?
loophole, E on Corbett, then hopefully we know if danger passes his fitness test before Parker plays tonight. If so then swap parker and Danger if corbett goes sub 50.
Quote from: tkringle on May 11, 2019, 01:09:51 PM
Quote from: Carn on May 10, 2019, 08:48:02 PM
Parker or Corbett?
Parker.
Answerth or Lockhart? need to field one of them with Whitfield out
E on Answerth & then take anything over 60.
Quote from: Bully on May 11, 2019, 01:49:53 PM
Quote from: tkringle on May 11, 2019, 01:09:51 PM
Quote from: Carn on May 10, 2019, 08:48:02 PM
Parker or Corbett?
Parker.
Answerth or Lockhart? need to field one of them with Whitfield out
E on Answerth & then take anything over 60.
can't as have two on the defensive bench not playing
Quote from: tkringle on May 11, 2019, 01:54:15 PM
Quote from: Bully on May 11, 2019, 01:49:53 PM
Quote from: tkringle on May 11, 2019, 01:09:51 PM
Quote from: Carn on May 10, 2019, 08:48:02 PM
Parker or Corbett?
Parker.
Answerth or Lockhart? need to field one of them with Whitfield out
E on Answerth & then take anything over 60.
can't as have two on the defensive bench not playing
Probably Answerth, think his floor is a little safer.
Take Gibbons’ middle of the rookie road 65ish or roll the dice on Clarke vs the Roos?
Quote from: tor01doc on May 11, 2019, 05:49:01 PM
Take Gibbons’ middle of the rookie road 65ish or roll the dice on Clarke vs the Roos?
Same here except Atkins. 65 is about par,not much to gain. Reckon I’ll take Gibbons score.
Also allows me to Captain Scott and get Grundys score. Safer than using Bines incase Dangers a late out.
Balta vs Dylan Moore. Scraping the barrel here
Quote from: dmac07 on May 17, 2019, 09:03:52 PM
Balta vs Dylan Moore. Scraping the barrel here
Balta
Balta vs Hayes
Corbett V Settlerfield V Parker
Take Lockhart's 52 or field one of Hayes/Balta?
Quote from: Gambino on May 18, 2019, 12:44:55 AM
Take Lockhart's 52 or field one of Hayes/Balta?
Balta.
Setterfield v Balta?
Gibbons or Hayes?
Take Lockhart’s 52 or field Clark? (If Moore is out)
Quote from: no eye deer on May 18, 2019, 09:51:47 AM
Take Lockhart’s 52 or field Clark? (If Moore is out)
I would field Clark, not a huge risk.
Moore won't play. Had dinner with an Asst coach last night.
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 18, 2019, 12:46:09 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 18, 2019, 09:51:47 AM
Take Lockhart’s 52 or field Clark? (If Moore is out)
I would field Clark, not a huge risk.
Moore won't play. Had dinner with an Asst coach last night.
Did he mention anything about Degoey?
Quote from: tkringle on May 18, 2019, 01:08:24 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 18, 2019, 12:46:09 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 18, 2019, 09:51:47 AM
Take Lockhart’s 52 or field Clark? (If Moore is out)
I would field Clark, not a huge risk.
Moore won't play. Had dinner with an Asst coach last night.
Did he mention anything about Degoey?
He said he will be given til the last minute. 50/50
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 18, 2019, 12:46:09 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 18, 2019, 09:51:47 AM
Take Lockhart’s 52 or field Clark? (If Moore is out)
I would field Clark, not a huge risk.
Moore won't play. Had dinner with an Asst coach last night.
Might be fielding both if the Brodie Smith romours are true.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 18, 2019, 01:45:41 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 18, 2019, 12:46:09 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 18, 2019, 09:51:47 AM
Take Lockhart’s 52 or field Clark? (If Moore is out)
I would field Clark, not a huge risk.
Moore won't play. Had dinner with an Asst coach last night.
Might be fielding both if the Brodie Smith romours are true.
No late outs for the Crows.
D. Moore out so D. Moore on field :)
Gibbons (vs Giants in Syd) or Butters (vs GC at home)
Looks the goods from here.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 18, 2019, 09:51:47 AM
Take Lockhart’s 52 or field Clark? (If Moore is out)
Took Clark........
JPK out means I have to do some shuffling so Balta vs Corbett?
parker vs Young
and Answerth vs Lockhart
Quote from: WizzFizz on May 24, 2019, 06:55:37 PM
parker vs Young
and Answerth vs Lockhart
Young and Lockhart
Well how about this one? Gibbons vs Answerth. :-[
And I have Hayes and Scott as well, but can’t even loophole! What a showershow!
Quote from: no eye deer on May 24, 2019, 07:22:36 PM
Well how about this one? Gibbons vs Answerth. :-[
And I have Hayes and Scott as well, but can’t even loophole! What a showershow!
Gibbons easy
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 25, 2019, 08:51:43 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 24, 2019, 07:22:36 PM
Well how about this one? Gibbons vs Answerth. :-[
And I have Hayes and Scott as well, but can’t even loophole! What a showershow!
Gibbons easy
Decided to swing Duursma into mids, bench Gibbons and loophole Answerth and Clark in defense
Atkins v Stocker v Gibbons
Pick 1
Quote from: tommy10 on May 24, 2019, 07:09:22 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on May 24, 2019, 06:55:37 PM
parker vs Young
and Answerth vs Lockhart
Young and Lockhart
Yeah I'd go with those 2 aswell.
I have the young v Parker one and it is quite a hard one as both are as likely as each other to have a variety in there scoring range due to their position
Take Scrimshaws 52 or field Answorth?
Quote from: Dolan on May 25, 2019, 06:25:28 PM
Take Scrimshaws 52 or field Answorth?
Take the 52 I reckon.
Gibbons or Lockhart?
Quote from: tkringle on May 25, 2019, 07:01:42 PM
Quote from: Dolan on May 25, 2019, 06:25:28 PM
Take Scrimshaws 52 or field Answorth?
Take the 52 I reckon.
Gibbons or Lockhart?
Lockhart. Been pretty consistent lately. Carlton could bounce back this weekand Gibbons MIGHT score well,but stick with Lockhart, 86, 54, 72 last three.
Quote from: tkringle on May 25, 2019, 07:01:42 PM
Quote from: Dolan on May 25, 2019, 06:25:28 PM
Take Scrimshaws 52 or field Answorth?
Take the 52 I reckon.
Gibbons or Lockhart?
Take Scrimshaw score
Lockhart for me!
Field Answerth or Gibbons this week?
Who’s less likely to score under 40 haha
Quote from: jfitty on May 31, 2019, 11:39:28 AM
Field Answerth or Gibbons this week?
Who’s less likely to score under 40 haha
Bias but would say Answerth this week. He will be under pressure to perform given Lions dropped Hinge and he would know that he has to lift to stay in side.
Field Stocker or Answerth?
[Stockerquote author=Wanderer link=topic=112933.msg1989191#msg1989191 date=1559292500]
Field Stocker or Answerth?
[/quote]
Might be a wet deck at the G on Sunday and the dons will flog em ( :'( kill me) so I'm avoiding all Blues rookies, Walsh excluded obviously.
I'm playing Larkey & Answerth ahead of Gibbons / Setterfield.
M.Parker/R.Young/J.Corbett/W.Setterfield can only field 2 who would you go?
Probably in the same boat as alot of people but i have to field one of Corbett Setterfield Young now which one?
Quote from: Dmoney$ on June 01, 2019, 01:05:49 PM
M.Parker/R.Young/J.Corbett/W.Setterfield can only field 2 who would you go?
Can you loop Corbett, Young or Parker
Quote from: Ringo on June 01, 2019, 02:06:53 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on June 01, 2019, 01:05:49 PM
M.Parker/R.Young/J.Corbett/W.Setterfield can only field 2 who would you go?
Can you loop Corbett, Young or Parker
Nah man Whole bench is playing ffs
Quote from: Dmoney$ on June 01, 2019, 02:22:24 PM
Quote from: Ringo on June 01, 2019, 02:06:53 PM
Quote from: Dmoney$ on June 01, 2019, 01:05:49 PM
M.Parker/R.Young/J.Corbett/W.Setterfield can only field 2 who would you go?
Can you loop Corbett, Young or Parker
Nah man Whole bench is playing ffs
OK thought you may have had Bines to loop. In that case my order would be Parker, Settlefield, Corbett and Young with not a lot of confidence as Young will probably come out this week and blitz all.
Looks like Atkins will get 70+
Take it or roll with answerth?
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 01, 2019, 08:04:56 PM
Looks like Atkins will get 70+
Take it or roll with answerth?
No brainer
Take it
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on June 01, 2019, 08:06:32 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 01, 2019, 08:04:56 PM
Looks like Atkins will get 70+
Take it or roll with answerth?
No brainer
Take it
Well I actually don't have a choice now with Hore being a late out haha
Loophole Clarke or Hately with Bewley? Or just play both Clarke and Hately?
Start 2 of Sicily, Logue and Harris Andrews
Quote from: no eye deer on June 27, 2019, 07:54:32 PM
Loophole Clarke or Hately with Bewley? Or just play both Clarke and Hately?
id loophole hately. Your not losing anything by not loopholing because brewley plays the last game so if another midfielder misses you can swap him with that player.
Quote from: whynot102 on June 27, 2019, 08:10:38 PM
Start 2 of Sicily, Logue and Harris Andrews
back sicily and andrews as they have history on their side. Logue may be playing a more friendly role than his first year. However he still only averaged 43 in 13 games, so im unsure if he'll be able to keep it up.
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 27, 2019, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Clarke is now 63! Reckon I will take that
Quote from: RoughRed on June 28, 2019, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 27, 2019, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Clarke is now 63! Reckon I will take that
Yeah I’m banking it too. I have Baker but he’s playing away against Lions so don’t see him topping 63.
Quote from: tommy10 on June 28, 2019, 01:09:04 AM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 28, 2019, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 27, 2019, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Clarke is now 63! Reckon I will take that
Yeah I’m banking it too. I have Baker but he’s playing away against Lions so don’t see him topping 63.
Clarke over Baker (avg 54, HS 69) and Bewley (avg 55, HS 68) is obvious. But what about Clarke vs. Hind (avg 67, HS 90)? Obviously a sample size of two games but one was great and one was crap. 43 again and I lose 20 points, 90 again and I gain 27. Tigers like giving up points. I'm very tempted to go Hind. Thoughts?
Quote from: LaHug on June 28, 2019, 11:28:26 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on June 28, 2019, 01:09:04 AM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 28, 2019, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 27, 2019, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Clarke is now 63! Reckon I will take that
Yeah I’m banking it too. I have Baker but he’s playing away against Lions so don’t see him topping 63.
Clarke over Baker (avg 54, HS 69) and Bewley (avg 55, HS 68) is obvious. But what about Clarke vs. Hind (avg 67, HS 90)? Obviously a sample size of two games but one was great and one was crap. 43 again and I lose 20 points, 90 again and I gain 27. Tigers like giving up points. I'm very tempted to go Hind. Thoughts?
Hinds role isn't great, would have to kick a couple of goals.
Quote from: jvalles69 on June 28, 2019, 01:25:26 PM
Quote from: LaHug on June 28, 2019, 11:28:26 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on June 28, 2019, 01:09:04 AM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 28, 2019, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 27, 2019, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Clarke is now 63! Reckon I will take that
Yeah I’m banking it too. I have Baker but he’s playing away against Lions so don’t see him topping 63.
Clarke over Baker (avg 54, HS 69) and Bewley (avg 55, HS 68) is obvious. But what about Clarke vs. Hind (avg 67, HS 90)? Obviously a sample size of two games but one was great and one was crap. 43 again and I lose 20 points, 90 again and I gain 27. Tigers like giving up points. I'm very tempted to go Hind. Thoughts?
Hinds role isn't great, would have to kick a couple of goals.
Agree. It comes down to whether you think Hind can kick 2+ goals against the Tigers or not.
Quote from: MontyJnr on June 28, 2019, 01:34:13 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on June 28, 2019, 01:25:26 PM
Quote from: LaHug on June 28, 2019, 11:28:26 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on June 28, 2019, 01:09:04 AM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 28, 2019, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 27, 2019, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Clarke is now 63! Reckon I will take that
Yeah I’m banking it too. I have Baker but he’s playing away against Lions so don’t see him topping 63.
Clarke over Baker (avg 54, HS 69) and Bewley (avg 55, HS 68) is obvious. But what about Clarke vs. Hind (avg 67, HS 90)? Obviously a sample size of two games but one was great and one was crap. 43 again and I lose 20 points, 90 again and I gain 27. Tigers like giving up points. I'm very tempted to go Hind. Thoughts?
Hinds role isn't great, would have to kick a couple of goals.
Agree. It comes down to whether you think Hind can kick 2+ goals against the Tigers or not.
Do you have Cripps? perfect Loophole for you then as Blues play last game
Quote from: Ringo on June 28, 2019, 02:16:16 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on June 28, 2019, 01:34:13 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on June 28, 2019, 01:25:26 PM
Quote from: LaHug on June 28, 2019, 11:28:26 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on June 28, 2019, 01:09:04 AM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 28, 2019, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 27, 2019, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Clarke is now 63! Reckon I will take that
Yeah I’m banking it too. I have Baker but he’s playing away against Lions so don’t see him topping 63.
Clarke over Baker (avg 54, HS 69) and Bewley (avg 55, HS 68) is obvious. But what about Clarke vs. Hind (avg 67, HS 90)? Obviously a sample size of two games but one was great and one was crap. 43 again and I lose 20 points, 90 again and I gain 27. Tigers like giving up points. I'm very tempted to go Hind. Thoughts?
Hinds role isn't great, would have to kick a couple of goals.
Agree. It comes down to whether you think Hind can kick 2+ goals against the Tigers or not.
Do you have Cripps? perfect Loophole for you then as Blues play last game
I think the decision is whether to take Clarke's score or play Hind Ringo. The loophole player is irrelevant.
Quote from: MontyJnr on June 28, 2019, 01:34:13 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on June 28, 2019, 01:25:26 PM
Quote from: LaHug on June 28, 2019, 11:28:26 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on June 28, 2019, 01:09:04 AM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 28, 2019, 12:19:51 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 27, 2019, 11:40:02 PM
Quote from: tkringle on June 27, 2019, 11:32:20 PM
Quote from: RoughRed on June 27, 2019, 11:21:36 PM
Take Clarke's 58 or loophole Bewley
Would go Bewley against the blues.
Clarke’s 58 vs an untried Hayden?
clarkes 58
Clarke is now 63! Reckon I will take that
Yeah I’m banking it too. I have Baker but he’s playing away against Lions so don’t see him topping 63.
Clarke over Baker (avg 54, HS 69) and Bewley (avg 55, HS 68) is obvious. But what about Clarke vs. Hind (avg 67, HS 90)? Obviously a sample size of two games but one was great and one was crap. 43 again and I lose 20 points, 90 again and I gain 27. Tigers like giving up points. I'm very tempted to go Hind. Thoughts?
Hinds role isn't great, would have to kick a couple of goals.
Agree. It comes down to whether you think Hind can kick 2+ goals against the Tigers or not.
Take Clarke's score. Don't see Hind kicking more than 2 goals again. If he scores a 75 you're losing 12 points, but could put up a 40 which will be worse. Anything over 60 I'd bank it.
On the other hand, if its a must win league game, then you can risk it with Hind, but see how your match ups are after Sat night and then make a decision.
Take Clarkes 63 or roll with Duursma against the Dogs at Adelaide Oval?
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 28, 2019, 03:57:52 PM
Take Clarkes 63 or roll with Duursma against the Dogs at Adelaide Oval?
Duursma I reckon.
Clarke v Bewley is hard. Slightly leaning to Clarke
Quote from: dylanclements on June 28, 2019, 04:02:37 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 28, 2019, 03:57:52 PM
Take Clarkes 63 or roll with Duursma against the Dogs at Adelaide Oval?
Duursma I reckon.
Clarke v Bewley is hard. Slightly leaning to Clarke
I've gone with Clarkes score over Bewley and Baker, showerty score, but not be much better...
Quote from: jvalles69 on June 28, 2019, 04:52:14 PM
Quote from: dylanclements on June 28, 2019, 04:02:37 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 28, 2019, 03:57:52 PM
Take Clarkes 63 or roll with Duursma against the Dogs at Adelaide Oval?
Duursma I reckon.
Clarke v Bewley is hard. Slightly leaning to Clarke
I've gone with Clarkes score over Bewley and Baker, showerty score, but not be much better...
It's not perfect but my 60 rule still applies, might lose 20 points but the downside could get ugly.
Bewley / Hine or Baker
Can loophole any of the three into another.
2 of Hore, Blakely or Logue?
Play hately or take clarke 55?
Quote from: Carn on July 06, 2019, 07:58:25 PM
Play hately or take clarke 55?
I'm rolling the dice on Hately myself
Here's a bit of a left field one - do I go Oliver, or chuck Bewley in for him and take Rowbottom's 99 :o
Ah, the dilemma!
Crippa back in this week means BCrouch gets benched, but JKelly being out for 3-4 with his calf would put BC back on field unless I trade, of which I have ample (Logue my only rook on field with ROB banked, 5+ trades, could complete my side with 4-5 left).
However Adelaide's draw for the next 4.....GC, Essendon @ Home, Carlton, Saints. Bloody tempting, isn't it? Gaffy looks tempting, but JK might be a good POD come seasons' end.
Will Bont play?
I I need to swing cover before MEL V WC game.,
Take Answerths 98 or field Stewart? Think I’ll take it, Stewart hasn’t got a very big ceiling
Quote from: no eye deer on July 27, 2019, 06:24:00 PM
Take Answerths 98 or field Stewart? Think I’ll take it, Stewart hasn’t got a very big ceiling
Gotta take the 98. Be very little extra imo.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 28, 2019, 12:23:09 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on July 27, 2019, 06:24:00 PM
Take Answerths 98 or field Stewart? Think I’ll take it, Stewart hasn’t got a very big ceiling
Gotta take the 98. Be very little extra imo.
+1 ... bank the money honey