Remember seeing (potentially making) this thread last year and had some great discussion and helped out a lot. Especially prior to season launch.
My biggest one currently is JPK v Hanners.
Can anyone shed some light on their pre seasons? Also, who fills the points void left by Titch?
Not sure there's a void to be filled - just a few more points to be spread around the existing core mids, plus I expect Heeney, Mills etc will increase
Start Hanners, because I want JPK to be as much of a POD as possible :P
Quote from: _wato on January 06, 2017, 12:29:29 AM
Remember seeing (potentially making) this thread last year and had some great discussion and helped out a lot. Especially prior to season launch.
My biggest one currently is JPK v Hanners.
Can anyone shed some light on their pre seasons? Also, who fills the points void left by Titch?
Can not go wrong with either and I will be starting one. Hanners at the moment but will be watching Swans pre-season to see how JPK is going to be used.
Another one
Bontempelli $586k v T Mitchell $566k
Quote from: Ringo on January 06, 2017, 10:50:04 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 06, 2017, 12:29:29 AM
Remember seeing (potentially making) this thread last year and had some great discussion and helped out a lot. Especially prior to season launch.
My biggest one currently is JPK v Hanners.
Can anyone shed some light on their pre seasons? Also, who fills the points void left by Titch?
Can not go wrong with either and I will be starting one. Hanners at the moment but will be watching Swans pre-season to see how JPK is going to be used.
Another one
Bontempelli $586k v T Mitchell $566k
Super easy.
Bont is a star, rated as one of the best players in the game already. Titch just racks up ball.
You know who Champion Data will give points to.
one im struggling with is Taylor Adams v Tom Mcondald.
Tmac had a big last 2/3 of the season and gives some much needed cash.
Quote from: Holz on January 06, 2017, 11:01:29 AM
one im struggling with is Taylor Adams v Tom Mcondald.
Tmac had a big last 2/3 of the season and gives some much needed cash.
You know how hard it was for me to give up TMac in Worlds - I rate him so highly and he is locked in my side for 2017. Will be a POD, and I think he can go 95+ comfortably
Adams will be super popular, but I can't see myself starting him. I'm sure he will also go 90+ but he tends to miss games and Collingwood have so much midfield depth so I'm a little uncertain on how he will go - prefe to wait and see so possible upgrade target for me
Quote from: Ringo on January 06, 2017, 10:50:04 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 06, 2017, 12:29:29 AM
Remember seeing (potentially making) this thread last year and had some great discussion and helped out a lot. Especially prior to season launch.
My biggest one currently is JPK v Hanners.
Can anyone shed some light on their pre seasons? Also, who fills the points void left by Titch?
Can not go wrong with either and I will be starting one. Hanners at the moment but will be watching Swans pre-season to see how JPK is going to be used.
Another one
Bontempelli $586k v T Mitchell $566k
Tom Mitchell no doubt... Collects the ball at will, undoubtedly will get more opportunity at hawthorn. Sydney mids took a hell of a lot of points off him and he was really only ever around the ball in junk time situations. Doubt that'll be the case this year
Quote from: Holz on January 06, 2017, 11:01:29 AM
one im struggling with is Taylor Adams v Tom Mcondald.
Tmac had a big last 2/3 of the season and gives some much needed cash.
Training sessions i've seen adams has been with the mids... He's 4th inline in our midfield, can also see sidebottom pushing forward to add some fire power for us. Returning small/rebounding defenders returning helps his cause too.
Only KPB i see having relevance is Rance
::)
I guess the NAB is the one to watch on this one, but
with less than 1k between the three of these players what are your thoughts on D Beams, $432,5000, M Murphy, $432,500 and I Heeney $433,400 ?? My thoughts are that if the stars align for Heeney and he gets a reasonable amount of mid time he could very likely be a top 7 forward. Beamer being managed for the rest of his career worries me but he is, in my mind, more than capable of averaging 110 and M Murphy confuses the living hell out of me. Can he score enough and make enough cash to be a worth while stepping stone. I don't think he can become a keeper again. Personally leaning toward Heeney and Beams ATM and both are currently in my ever changing team. What do you think ?? Cheers all. ;)
Going to see what Beams and Murphy do in the NAB which will give some guide. Heeney more likely to be used everywhere and may even get a tag, so not interested (yet)
Even with Gibbs and Cripps having very good years they still tagged Murphy when he played , teams just love tagging him a bit like Rich he is one I will go nowhere near this year after thinking he was a good cheap pickup last year
Jelwood v Rocky v Neale
If they all play 22 games, I'd say Rocky. But he won't so I've gone for Jelwood based on consistency and the fact he didn't have a pre-season last year and still dominated. Neale has hurt his knee pre-season so I have my doubts. All guns, all similar price. Tough call.
Quote from: silvan14 on January 09, 2017, 10:23:45 PM
Jelwood v Rocky v Neale
If they all play 22 games, I'd say Rocky. But he won't so I've gone for Jelwood based on consistency and the fact he didn't have a pre-season last year and still dominated. Neale has hurt his knee pre-season so I have my doubts. All guns, all similar price. Tough call.
I wouldn't start Neale - need to see how he goes with Fyfe in the side
I expect Jelwood to be a bit of a POD to start this year too
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on January 09, 2017, 10:31:22 PM
Quote from: silvan14 on January 09, 2017, 10:23:45 PM
Jelwood v Rocky v Neale
If they all play 22 games, I'd say Rocky. But he won't so I've gone for Jelwood based on consistency and the fact he didn't have a pre-season last year and still dominated. Neale has hurt his knee pre-season so I have my doubts. All guns, all similar price. Tough call.
I wouldn't start Neale - need to see how he goes with Fyfe in the side
I expect Jelwood to be a bit of a POD to start this year too
I'm actually going with Jelwood and Treloar as M1/M2 at this stage. I think Treloar may overtake Pendles at Collingwood and waiting for Danger to come down in price. Maybe Jelwood is my POD like JPK is yours :)
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on January 09, 2017, 10:31:22 PM
Quote from: silvan14 on January 09, 2017, 10:23:45 PM
Jelwood v Rocky v Neale
If they all play 22 games, I'd say Rocky. But he won't so I've gone for Jelwood based on consistency and the fact he didn't have a pre-season last year and still dominated. Neale has hurt his knee pre-season so I have my doubts. All guns, all similar price. Tough call.
I wouldn't start Neale - need to see how he goes with Fyfe in the side
I expect Jelwood to be a bit of a POD to start this year too
I will be starting Neale over Fyfe he proved to me last year he loves getting the pill and that will continue this year no matter who is on the field , more concerned with Fyfe 2 years ruined from his leg cracking the same leg thinking he might be eased into the season as any more trouble with the leg would be a disaster for him
Be inclined to play rocky over Jelwood or Neale. Rocky is a proven pig SC scorer and if he buckles you will have the money to move onto someone else. Jelwood as usual you will be able to access later at a value price via upgrade maybe in the early bye round.
Fyfe is a toss of the dice. Either way I am not sure what impact he will have on Neale's scoring so going to leave Neale alone and decide on Fyfe after watching the pre season games.
Danger, Pendles locked, all the rest up in the air still. hmmm maybe Bont just because I love the way he plays and he is next likely superprem.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 06, 2017, 11:31:55 PM
Quote from: Ringo on January 06, 2017, 10:50:04 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 06, 2017, 12:29:29 AM
Another one
Bontempelli $586k v T Mitchell $566k
Tom Mitchell no doubt... Collects the ball at will, undoubtedly will get more opportunity at hawthorn. Sydney mids took a hell of a lot of points off him and he was really only ever around the ball in junk time situations. Doubt that'll be the case this year
I think that Titch will get lots more attention at the Hawks. As he is now probably their number one midfielder. He could cop a tag, and when he copped a tag in the past he didn't go so well. I still think his scores will be good for the year. But also up and down. Some 60's and then some ridiculous 140's as well. Not sure he is consistent enough. That said I will see how he starts the season.
The Bont is the smooth moving machine. That is very efficient. Just sometimes doesn't get enough of the ball. And will also cop a tag I feel.
Quote
one im struggling with is Taylor Adams v Tom Mcondald.
Tmac had a big last 2/3 of the season and gives some much needed cash.
Taylor Adams gets injured a lot. I'm looking for more stable player. Even though I know he will pump out big scores though the year.
Tmac will be more consistent than last year. But not sure he will get back to his heights of a few years ago.
Rance V Laird
Quote from: Sweet Chilli on January 11, 2017, 10:25:47 AM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 06, 2017, 11:31:55 PM
Quote from: Ringo on January 06, 2017, 10:50:04 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 06, 2017, 12:29:29 AM
Another one
Bontempelli $586k v T Mitchell $566k
Tom Mitchell no doubt... Collects the ball at will, undoubtedly will get more opportunity at hawthorn. Sydney mids took a hell of a lot of points off him and he was really only ever around the ball in junk time situations. Doubt that'll be the case this year
I think that Titch will get lots more attention at the Hawks. As he is now probably their number one midfielder. He could cop a tag, and when he copped a tag in the past he didn't go so well. I still think his scores will be good for the year. But also up and down. Some 60's and then some ridiculous 140's as well. Not sure he is consistent enough. That said I will see how he starts the season.
The Bont is the smooth moving machine. That is very efficient. Just sometimes doesn't get enough of the ball. And will also cop a tag I feel.
Quote
I think the simple one is this
AFL Power Rankings
Patrick Dangerfield
Josh P. Kennedy
Robbie Gray
Scott Pendlebury
Marcus Bontempelli
Todd Goldstein
Nic Naitanui
Rory Sloane
Cyril Rioli
Dayne Zorko
they are all gun SCers
then we have Mitchell at 62.
Always pick the better AFL player.
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
I expect them to average the same over the season however Rance will fluctuate more and will be able to be picked up cheaper later in the season, thus I am starting with Laird of the two.
Quote from: Huttabito on January 11, 2017, 04:54:36 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
I expect them to average the same over the season however Rance will fluctuate more and will be able to be picked up cheaper later in the season, thus I am starting with Laird of the two.
Going on last years scores can't see how you can say Rance will fluctuate more but they are both good picks probably will start with both
Quote from: shaker on January 11, 2017, 05:24:46 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on January 11, 2017, 04:54:36 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
I expect them to average the same over the season however Rance will fluctuate more and will be able to be picked up cheaper later in the season, thus I am starting with Laird of the two.
Going on last years scores can't see how you can say Rance will fluctuate more but they are both good picks probably will start with both
I would rather start Laird and gauge how Richmond are going, it seems that Rance almost goes better when Richmond's season is cooked. 100, 145, 120, 126, 80 and 90 to end the year.
Quote from: shaker on January 11, 2017, 05:24:46 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on January 11, 2017, 04:54:36 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
I expect them to average the same over the season however Rance will fluctuate more and will be able to be picked up cheaper later in the season, thus I am starting with Laird of the two.
Going on last years scores can't see how you can say Rance will fluctuate more but they are both good picks probably will start with both
because Rance is a KPP he has to fluctuate.
forget that fact he is pretty much the most stable SC back and one of the most stable SC players in the comp not only last year but for his last 6-7 years.
Quote from: shaker on January 11, 2017, 05:24:46 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on January 11, 2017, 04:54:36 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
I expect them to average the same over the season however Rance will fluctuate more and will be able to be picked up cheaper later in the season, thus I am starting with Laird of the two.
Going on last years scores can't see how you can say Rance will fluctuate more but they are both good picks probably will start with both
Rance's lowest price last year was $92.6k lower than his starting price compared to Laird who's was $38.5k. I'm not saying either are bad picks and I'm sure to end up with both come season end, however I only have room for 1 in my starting side and I've opted for Laird as it saves $9k initially and I think I will be able to get him more cheaper at some point in the season.
Quote from: Huttabito on January 11, 2017, 06:02:27 PM
Quote from: shaker on January 11, 2017, 05:24:46 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on January 11, 2017, 04:54:36 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
I expect them to average the same over the season however Rance will fluctuate more and will be able to be picked up cheaper later in the season, thus I am starting with Laird of the two.
Going on last years scores can't see how you can say Rance will fluctuate more but they are both good picks probably will start with both
Rance's lowest price last year was $92.6k lower than his starting price compared to Laird who's was $38.5k. I'm not saying either are bad picks and I'm sure to end up with both come season end, however I only have room for 1 in my starting side and I've opted for Laird as it saves $9k initially and I think I will be able to get him more cheaper at some point in the season.
who else is in your starting side?
im not going to put up a case against laird as both are must haves in my books.
Laird starter the year cheaper and averaged just under rance so thats why he didn't drop. he was actually less consistent though so if he started the season the same price as rance then you would have been able to pick him up cheaper then rance.
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
This one has got me thinking, when I did my first draft I put both in considering both as strong consistent options in defence.
Looking into both though and I see a few things that concern me.
Laird DE% was 82% last year, the highest of every player averaging over 25 possessions. In matches when he went sub 100 he only went at 78% on average.
Laird had 6 of 17 games with 30+ possessions (for comparison Shaw only had 4/22, Docherty 6/22, Simpson 7/22), what this tells me is his scores was very much reliant on him getting the pill and disposing of it well compared to other defenders that pad their scores with other stats.
Rance's stats really only show moderate improvement from 2014. Improved marks and slight disposal improvement. His DE% went at 86% last year. When Rance had a few good runs he was averaging 22 possessions a game, outside this he was only averaging 90
If you want a player that will average 87-93 then feel free to pick him as the majority of his scores will be around this mark, with the odd 100+ offsetting the odd 70. Im feeling that his averages of 96 & 98 in the last 2 years are somewhat deceptive and likely to fall back to a 90ish this year.
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 11, 2017, 07:35:42 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
This one has got me thinking, when I did my first draft I put both in considering both as strong consistent options in defence.
Looking into both though and I see a few things that concern me.
Laird DE% was 82% last year, the highest of every player averaging over 25 possessions. In matches when he went sub 100 he only went at 78% on average.
Laird had 6 of 17 games with 30+ possessions (for comparison Shaw only had 4/22, Docherty 6/22, Simpson 7/22), what this tells me is his scores was very much reliant on him getting the pill and disposing of it well compared to other defenders that pad their scores with other stats.
Rance's stats really only show moderate improvement from 2014. Improved marks and slight disposal improvement. His DE% went at 86% last year. When Rance had a few good runs he was averaging 22 possessions a game, outside this he was only averaging 90
If you want a player that will average 87-93 then feel free to pick him as the majority of his scores will be around this mark, with the odd 100+ offsetting the odd 70. Im feeling that his averages of 96 & 98 in the last 2 years are somewhat deceptive and likely to fall back to a 90ish this year.
Agree, although Laird does get a lot of the pill, a lot of it is backwards/cheap kicks and handballs which doesn't add up to much in ways of supercoach scoring which can be frustrating when you see he has 35 touches and he finishes with like a 98, that's the only knock i have on him though and i will probably be starting with him too.
I could have both in my starting side. For me it's a matter of picking 3 out of Shaw, Adams, Rance and Laird and I have Adams slightly ahead with Shaw a lock to go 105ish.
My question is more around if anyone sees either breaking out further. Probably Laird the one with the most potential to do that but can he elevate himself to be a 100+ player?
I plan on starting only 3 def prems so cant see myself starting either Rance or Laird
Oddly enough, I've never had Rance in my SC team all years of playing, not intentionally, just so happens to be
Quote from: quinny88 on January 11, 2017, 04:40:05 PM
Rance V Laird
Rance has proved that he will play 20+ games without injury, which is laird's problem. But laird hitting prime age now where injuries tend to cease. I think laird will average 5-10 points more if he goes injury free. Rance is safer option but Laird more upside.
Last 4 of 5 years uninjured for Rance
Laird not one year where he's played all 22
Another one for Defence
Jack Martin (Suns) v Bob Murphy (Dogs)
Martin's stats made interesting reading when I started the investigation 8 scores over 90 with 3 tons, 6 scores though below 50. Rumoured to be training well and has DPP to forwards. Martin was the 2012 No 1 draft pick and at 22 could this be his break out year.
Murphy returning from injury lay off 35 years of age though although and only averaged over 90 3 times in career (excluding last year)
One of the two will sit at D3 to start with as going very heavy in mids.
Quote from: Ringo on January 12, 2017, 02:33:31 PM
Another one for Defence
Jack Martin (Suns) v Bob Murphy (Dogs)
Martin's stats made interesting reading when I started the investigation 8 scores over 90 with 3 tons, 6 scores though below 50. Rumoured to be training well and has DPP to forwards. Martin was the 2012 No 1 draft pick and at 22 could this be his break out year.
Murphy returning from injury lay off 35 years of age though although and only averaged over 90 3 times in career (excluding last year)
One of the two will sit at D3 to start with as going very heavy in mids.
Mini Draft wasn't it..?
Either way i'd take martin, murphy's scores will be a lot lower than 2015 let alone 2016 average. His ACL innjury will hurt him
Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Murphy
and
TMac + (the winner of the above) + swallow VS Rance + Laird + mid rookie
Quote from: WizzFizz on January 13, 2017, 02:32:04 AM
Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Murphy
and
TMac + (the winner of the above) + swallow VS Rance + Laird + mid rookie
None
Rance Laird easy
Quote from: Holz on January 13, 2017, 10:16:41 AM
Quote from: WizzFizz on January 13, 2017, 02:32:04 AM
Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Murphy
and
TMac + (the winner of the above) + swallow VS Rance + Laird + mid rookie
None
Rance Laird easy
Pretty much
Quote from: Holz on January 13, 2017, 10:16:41 AM
Quote from: WizzFizz on January 13, 2017, 02:32:04 AM
Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Murphy
and
TMac + (the winner of the above) + swallow VS Rance + Laird + mid rookie
None
Rance Laird easy
what do u think of swallow?
GAJ vs Beams
Gaz is nearly 200k more than Beams so if you have 620k up your sleeve for Gaz I think there are many better value players for that so I would go Beams or a different player
Quote from: frenzy on January 14, 2017, 03:26:13 PM
GAJ vs Beams
Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.
Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 15, 2017, 02:49:59 PM
Quote from: frenzy on January 14, 2017, 03:26:13 PM
GAJ vs Beams
Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.
Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn
Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn
Quote from: enzedder on January 16, 2017, 06:05:58 PM
Quote from: shaker on January 16, 2017, 04:49:17 PM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 15, 2017, 02:49:59 PM
Quote from: frenzy on January 14, 2017, 03:26:13 PM
GAJ vs Beams
Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.
Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn
Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn
Same... Gawn and Adams.
I don't like either option, but would go Grundy & Shaw
100+105 vs 85+110
Id be looking elsewhere though
Grundy won't be a 110 point ruckman and in that position you don't want to be losing 10 points per week on other teams.
Adams scored 5/11 below 80 last year, picking him as a premium its just fraught with danger when there are so many other options around.
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 16, 2017, 06:41:22 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 16, 2017, 06:05:58 PM
Quote from: shaker on January 16, 2017, 04:49:17 PM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 15, 2017, 02:49:59 PM
Quote from: frenzy on January 14, 2017, 03:26:13 PM
GAJ vs Beams
Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.
Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn
Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn
Same... Gawn and Adams.
I don't like either option, but would go Grundy & Shaw
100+105 vs 85+110
Id be looking elsewhere though
Grundy won't be a 110 point ruckman and in that position you don't want to be losing 10 points per week on other teams.
Adams scored 5/11 below 80 last year, picking him as a premium its just fraught with danger when there are so many other options around.
Adams actually scored 3/14 under 80 last season and averaged 97 with 7 over 100, also averaged 97 in 2015. You couldn't possibly be expecting less than an average of 95 from Adams. The question is more if he can stay on the park for the entire season.
I'd be expecting them to average more or less the same... Grundy (105) and Shaw (105) vs Gawn (115) and Adams (95) although I'd be leaning towards Gawn/Adams as they are more capable of going higher than stated.
But I do agree with danger with picking Adams given his recent injury history and the range of other premiums at a similar price.
I think Adams is due for some luck injury wise it is not like he has a chronic problem , hammy , knee , quad I think over last couple of years , he is coming into his prime I'm tipping he will top the ton this year easily ;) even thinking of starting him M4 or 5
Gawn + O'meara/Swallow v Sandi + Treloar
Don't know why but I'm leaning towards Gawn and Swallow.
Quote from: Huttabito on January 16, 2017, 07:20:00 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 16, 2017, 06:41:22 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 16, 2017, 06:05:58 PM
Quote from: shaker on January 16, 2017, 04:49:17 PM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 15, 2017, 02:49:59 PM
Quote from: frenzy on January 14, 2017, 03:26:13 PM
GAJ vs Beams
Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.
Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn
Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn
Same... Gawn and Adams.
I don't like either option, but would go Grundy & Shaw
100+105 vs 85+110
Id be looking elsewhere though
Grundy won't be a 110 point ruckman and in that position you don't want to be losing 10 points per week on other teams.
Adams scored 5/11 below 80 last year, picking him as a premium its just fraught with danger when there are so many other options around.
Adams actually scored 3/14 under 80 last season and averaged 97 with 7 over 100, also averaged 97 in 2015. You couldn't possibly be expecting less than an average of 95 from Adams. The question is more if he can stay on the park for the entire season.
I'd be expecting them to average more or less the same... Grundy (105) and Shaw (105) vs Gawn (115) and Adams (95) although I'd be leaning towards Gawn/Adams as they are more capable of going higher than stated.
But I do agree with danger with picking Adams given his recent injury history and the range of other premiums at a similar price.
Well I was looking at Marcus Adams not Taylor Adams.
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 16, 2017, 06:41:22 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 16, 2017, 06:05:58 PM
Quote from: shaker on January 16, 2017, 04:49:17 PM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 15, 2017, 02:49:59 PM
Quote from: frenzy on January 14, 2017, 03:26:13 PM
GAJ vs Beams
Neither... Hannebery if you don't have him.
Grundy + Shaw v Adams + Gawn
Tough one but leaning towards Adams + Gawn
Same... Gawn and Adams.
I don't like either option, but would go Grundy & Shaw
100+105 vs 85+110
Id be looking elsewhere though
Grundy won't be a 110 point ruckman and in that position you don't want to be losing 10 points per week on other teams.
Adams scored 5/11 below 80 last year, picking him as a premium its just fraught with danger when there are so many other options around.
Who are these other options? Gawn,Goldy,Grundy and Martin.
Gawn is max price, many people are looking at Goldy's knee issues last year + 2-3 top clearance players retired and North are going to fall harder than some think and the games over the last 2 years where Goldy put up huge numbers he scored 2 or 3 goals in, 3rd man up rule change working in Gawn/goldys favour tho.
I had Martin last year, he might go well this year but i am not going there again so it's Gawn/Grundy + Sandi at R2
Grundy/Sandi is looking like a real money saver with not much downside and a chance to see if Goldy can again match Gawn.
TMac vs Hodge
Cheers
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 17, 2017, 09:40:29 PM
TMac vs Hodge
Cheers
TMac, expect Hodge to be a bit player all over the field this year. Plus his style of game will slow down quicker than a Sam M or Boomer. More downside risk with Hodge. TMac is a chance to increase his consistency (for a KPP) and I expecting 92-98 avg from him.
Hartlett + Docherty vs Taylor Adams + Johanissen
Quote from: blackrose on January 20, 2017, 01:24:40 AM
Hartlett + Docherty vs Taylor Adams + Johanissen
Adams and Johannisen
Quote from: TomK on January 20, 2017, 02:24:44 AM
Quote from: blackrose on January 20, 2017, 01:24:40 AM
Hartlett + Docherty vs Taylor Adams + Johanissen
Adams and Johannisen
Leaning the other way. Figure Doc is a 105+110 option, Johanissen is 92-98 option, Adams is a query. So comes down to Hartlett +10-13 pts over Adams.
Quote from: crowls on January 20, 2017, 11:19:37 AM
Quote from: TomK on January 20, 2017, 02:24:44 AM
Quote from: blackrose on January 20, 2017, 01:24:40 AM
Hartlett + Docherty vs Taylor Adams + Johanissen
Adams and Johannisen
Leaning the other way. Figure Doc is a 105+110 option, Johanissen is 92-98 option, Adams is a query. So comes down to Hartlett +10-13 pts over Adams.
Docherty has had 1 solid year and 1 good year. He increased his output to a level that is the envy of most defenders being top 3 in most stats, but I have a few question marks on him this year
1: What is the impact of Tuohy leaving given he was also a top 12 rebounding defender - Will this result in Simpson moving back from the wing into the rebounding role? How could this impact Docherty's possession and distribution numbers?
2: Where is the improvement - Arguably you could say he could increase his possession numbers further, but doing this will likely result in a drop in some of his other stats.
If im going to be paying for a player at that price I want to be able to be certain of his output. Id be happy to say I believe he will be around 100 and a top 6 defender, but there is some possibility that the he will drop towards more of the 95 mark.
For $591k you are able to pick Sloane, Cripps, Gray, Sidebottom, Ward, Fyfe and numerous more that already have years of runs on the board or a lot more upside
Danger and Grundy vs Pendles and Goldy?
Quote from: tommy10 on January 21, 2017, 02:03:39 AM
Danger and Grundy vs Pendles and Goldy?
Probably one of the tougher ones I've seen but you've got to go Pendles and Goldy as they are both going to be top 2 (you would think) in there position come seasons end.
Grundy is a bit of a risk compared to the other two.
Have a look at North's opening 8-10 rounds and Goldstein will go well - remember they started well last season too
NRoo + Bont vs Macrea + Sloane (Don't want to pick 3 dogs prems)
Cheers
nroo and bont. bont is a better vc option and he looks like another pendlebuty in the making.
Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Biggs?
Another one...
Docherty and Hartlett/Hibberd/Biggs vs Rance and JJ/Vince?
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 23, 2017, 12:07:02 AM
NRoo + Bont vs Macrea + Sloane (Don't want to pick 3 dogs prems)
Cheers
Macrae and Sloane. Macrae should be less of a risk than nroo and score similar, and Sloaney is just awesome
Quote from: tommy10 on January 25, 2017, 12:31:19 AM
Hibberd vs Hartlett vs Biggs?
Probably Hibberd for me there
Quote from: tommy10 on January 25, 2017, 12:34:06 AM
Another one...
Docherty and Hartlett/Hibberd/Biggs vs Rance and JJ/Vince?
I'd be tempted to go Rance and Vince. Think Docherty will drop a bit in price early on.
Quote from: GoLions on January 25, 2017, 01:14:25 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on January 25, 2017, 12:34:06 AM
Another one...
Docherty and Hartlett/Hibberd/Biggs vs Rance and JJ/Vince?
I'd be tempted to go Rance and Vince. Think Docherty will drop a bit in price early on.
Thanks mate
Quote from: tommy10 on January 25, 2017, 02:04:37 PM
Quote from: GoLions on January 25, 2017, 01:14:25 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on January 25, 2017, 12:34:06 AM
Another one...
Docherty and Hartlett/Hibberd/Biggs vs Rance and JJ/Vince?
I'd be tempted to go Rance and Vince. Think Docherty will drop a bit in price early on.
Thanks mate
Definitely Rance and Bernie, couldn't trust Hartlett, Hibberd or Biggs in my team
Quote from: Gandalf123 on January 25, 2017, 02:17:57 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on January 25, 2017, 02:04:37 PM
Quote from: GoLions on January 25, 2017, 01:14:25 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on January 25, 2017, 12:34:06 AM
Another one...
Docherty and Hartlett/Hibberd/Biggs vs Rance and JJ/Vince?
I'd be tempted to go Rance and Vince. Think Docherty will drop a bit in price early on.
Thanks mate
Definitely Rance and Bernie, couldn't trust Hartlett, Hibberd or Biggs in my team
Hibberd will do better out if those three, but safer I guess with Bernice and Rance. There's also Laird too.
JPK, Macrae and McCarthy vs Viney, Touk Miller and Brayshaw
Quote from: TexR74 on January 25, 2017, 03:55:36 PM
JPK, Macrae and McCarthy vs Viney, Touk Miller and Brayshaw
1st three easssyyyyyy
Quote from: TexR74 on January 25, 2017, 03:55:36 PM
JPK, Macrae and McCarthy vs Viney, Touk Miller and Brayshaw
Without a doubt
Gawn/Murphy vs Goldy/Heppell
Quote from: Huttabito on January 25, 2017, 05:20:50 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on January 25, 2017, 03:55:36 PM
JPK, Macrae and McCarthy vs Viney, Touk Miller and Brayshaw
Without a doubt
Gawn/Murphy vs Goldy/Heppell
Tough one and honestly have no idea. Propably leaning towards 2nd option purely because of heppell vs murphy however I have gone Gawn over Goldy in my side.
Sloane + Macrea vs Bont + Lids (don't want to many doggies - alreadly have dahl and JJ)
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 25, 2017, 05:23:24 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on January 25, 2017, 05:20:50 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on January 25, 2017, 03:55:36 PM
JPK, Macrae and McCarthy vs Viney, Touk Miller and Brayshaw
Without a doubt
Gawn/Murphy vs Goldy/Heppell
Tough one and honestly have no idea. Propably leaning towards 2nd option purely because of heppell vs murphy however I have gone Gawn over Goldy in my side.
Sloane + Macrea vs Bont + Lids (don't want to many doggies - alreadly have dahl and JJ)
Probably Sloane and Macrae. Toss up between Bont bs Sloane, but Bont does get tagged.
Rocky vs Treloar vs JPK
Quote from: tommy10 on January 27, 2017, 12:43:08 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 25, 2017, 05:23:24 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on January 25, 2017, 05:20:50 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on January 25, 2017, 03:55:36 PM
JPK, Macrae and McCarthy vs Viney, Touk Miller and Brayshaw
Without a doubt
Gawn/Murphy vs Goldy/Heppell
Tough one and honestly have no idea. Propably leaning towards 2nd option purely because of heppell vs murphy however I have gone Gawn over Goldy in my side.
Sloane + Macrea vs Bont + Lids (don't want to many doggies - alreadly have dahl and JJ)
Probably Sloane and Macrae. Toss up between Bont bs Sloane, but Bont does get tagged.
Rocky vs Treloar vs JPK
I think Rocky could score higher in the games he plays than Treloar and JPK provided he retains the captaincy or rather if his attitude is right. But I'd go
Treloar, Rocky, JPK
Quote from: GoLions on January 25, 2017, 01:14:25 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on January 25, 2017, 12:34:06 AM
Another one...
Docherty and Hartlett/Hibberd/Biggs vs Rance and JJ/Vince?
I'd be tempted to go Rance and Vince. Think Docherty will drop a bit in price early on.
Vince has a big standard deviation due to tagging duties, Rance also given he's a KP player. Hartlet has averaged 90+ in 5 out of the past 6 years. last year being his major blip. If he's playing on the ball I think it's safe to assume he will hit 90 again.
Quote from: tommy10 on January 27, 2017, 12:43:08 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 25, 2017, 05:23:24 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on January 25, 2017, 05:20:50 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on January 25, 2017, 03:55:36 PM
JPK, Macrae and McCarthy vs Viney, Touk Miller and Brayshaw
Without a doubt
Gawn/Murphy vs Goldy/Heppell
Tough one and honestly have no idea. Propably leaning towards 2nd option purely because of heppell vs murphy however I have gone Gawn over Goldy in my side.
Sloane + Macrea vs Bont + Lids (don't want to many doggies - alreadly have dahl and JJ)
Probably Sloane and Macrae. Toss up between Bont bs Sloane, but Bont does get tagged.
Rocky vs Treloar vs JPK
Rocky... based on points alone
Treloar... based on points and durability
assess injury risk of rest of your team
Thanks guys. What about Pendles and Vince vs Bont (I know he can get tagged but could take his game to another level) and Shaw?
Would prefer Pendles and Shaw if you could get both.
Personally got reservation on Bont as I think he was the benefactor of all the injuries the dogs had to their midfield and whether he can keep the momentum going with their return is debateable.
So if pressed would go the ever reliable Pendles and Vince.
D2/M5/R2
H.Shaw, D.Swallow, B.Grundy
Vs
T.Adams, Heppell, Sandilands
Quote from: dmac07 on January 28, 2017, 12:45:04 PM
D2/M5/R2
H.Shaw, D.Swallow, B.Grundy
Vs
T.Adams, Heppell, Sandilands
I'd personally go Shaw/Swallow/Grundy. There's less risk there. Adams missed a few last year, Sandi injury prone and Heppell is an unknown.
Similarly, anyone help with... M5/M6/F4
M. Murphy/D.Beams, D. Swallow, J. Macrae
or
T. Rockliff/A. Treloar, D. Swallow, J. Roughead
or
M. Murphy, J. Watson/D. Beams, J. Roughead
Cheers!! :D
Quote from: Sven on January 28, 2017, 02:23:56 PM
Similarly, anyone help with... M5/M6/F4
M. Murphy/D.Beams, D. Swallow, J. Macrae
or
T. Rockliff/A. Treloar, D. Swallow, J. Roughead
or
M. Murphy, J. Watson/D. Beams, J. Roughead
Cheers!! :D
Rank in order for M3.
Ablett, Treloar, Jelly, Hanners.
Rank in order for M3.
Ablett, Treloar, Jelly, Hanners.
Hanners, Treloar, Ablett, Jelly
Quote from: _wato on January 29, 2017, 08:26:49 PM
Rank in order for M3.
Ablett, Treloar, Jelly, Hanners.
Hanners, Gablett, Jelly, Treloar
Ryder vs Nank as R/F Sandi cover
Quote from: GCSkiwi on January 30, 2017, 01:28:16 PM
Quote from: _wato on January 29, 2017, 08:26:49 PM
Rank in order for M3.
Ablett, Treloar, Jelly, Hanners.
Hanners, Gablett, Jelly, Treloar
Ryder vs Nank as R/F Sandi cover
Ryder
Quote from: Gandalf123 on January 30, 2017, 04:04:25 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on January 30, 2017, 01:28:16 PM
Quote from: _wato on January 29, 2017, 08:26:49 PM
Rank in order for M3.
Ablett, Treloar, Jelly, Hanners.
Hanners, Gablett, Jelly, Treloar
Ryder vs Nank as R/F Sandi cover
Ryder
Why not put Witts on Ruck bench and bring in another FWD rookie of which there are looking to be plenty?
2 cash cows + cover for Sandi, without the need to be running a non prem on the field as cover.
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 30, 2017, 04:57:52 PM
Quote from: Gandalf123 on January 30, 2017, 04:04:25 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on January 30, 2017, 01:28:16 PM
Quote from: _wato on January 29, 2017, 08:26:49 PM
Rank in order for M3.
Ablett, Treloar, Jelly, Hanners.
Hanners, Gablett, Jelly, Treloar
Ryder vs Nank as R/F Sandi cover
Ryder
Why not put Witts on Ruck bench and bring in another FWD rookie of which there are looking to be plenty?
2 cash cows + cover for Sandi, without the need to be running a non prem on the field as cover.
Ryder will be sole ruckman, that usually entails 85+.
Quote from: Bully on January 30, 2017, 08:47:02 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 30, 2017, 04:57:52 PM
Quote from: Gandalf123 on January 30, 2017, 04:04:25 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on January 30, 2017, 01:28:16 PM
Quote from: _wato on January 29, 2017, 08:26:49 PM
Rank in order for M3.
Ablett, Treloar, Jelly, Hanners.
Hanners, Gablett, Jelly, Treloar
Ryder vs Nank as R/F Sandi cover
Ryder
Why not put Witts on Ruck bench and bring in another FWD rookie of which there are looking to be plenty?
2 cash cows + cover for Sandi, without the need to be running a non prem on the field as cover.
Ryder will be sole ruckman, that usually entails 85+.
You can't decide until RD 1 Really
Ryder is safe, will go 85+
For me nankervis has a very high ceiling if given a full run at the ruck, he's pretty much shane mumford with extremely sticky jukes. If he's named sole ruck round 1 i'd be tempted to lock him in. Unfortunately Vickery void is what he is likely to fill
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 31, 2017, 12:12:03 AM
Quote from: Bully on January 30, 2017, 08:47:02 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 30, 2017, 04:57:52 PM
Quote from: Gandalf123 on January 30, 2017, 04:04:25 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on January 30, 2017, 01:28:16 PM
Quote from: _wato on January 29, 2017, 08:26:49 PM
Rank in order for M3.
Ablett, Treloar, Jelly, Hanners.
Hanners, Gablett, Jelly, Treloar
Ryder vs Nank as R/F Sandi cover
Ryder
Why not put Witts on Ruck bench and bring in another FWD rookie of which there are looking to be plenty?
2 cash cows + cover for Sandi, without the need to be running a non prem on the field as cover.
Ryder will be sole ruckman, that usually entails 85+.
You can't decide until RD 1 Really
Ryder is safe, will go 85+
For me nankervis has a very high ceiling if given a full run at the ruck, he's pretty much shane mumford with extremely sticky jukes. If he's named sole ruck round 1 i'd be tempted to lock him in. Unfortunately Vickery void is what he is likely to fill
Nank has been going up against Maric in the match simulations, hasn't quite pushed his claims as yet. I like him as a prospect but I like Ryder's JS much more. At the moment it's Hampson vs Maric for the number one gig at Richmond.
Laird v Montagna v Rance v Adams pick 2 as D2, D3
Quote from: EazyMoney on January 31, 2017, 11:11:25 AM
Laird v Montagna v Rance v Adams pick 2 as D2, D3
Definitely Adams, definitely not Montagna, I would probably take Rance over Laird but either is a good pick.
Thanks for the discussion on Nank/Ryder guys :)
Quote from: EazyMoney on January 31, 2017, 11:11:25 AM
Laird v Montagna v Rance v Adams pick 2 as D2, D3
all great picks, hard to separate. All priced about right too. I'm personally not a fan of KPPs so Rance is out for me.
For me
Adams D2
Laird is safe pick. Montagna likely to average more, but older so could miss games. Laird has R13 bye (Montagna R11) which is better for starting players, but depends who your D1 is.
Laird D3 just
Quote from: gloryboy on January 31, 2017, 11:19:46 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on January 31, 2017, 11:11:25 AM
Laird v Montagna v Rance v Adams pick 2 as D2, D3
all great picks, hard to separate. All priced about right too. I'm personally not a fan of KPPs so Rance is out for me.
For me
Adams D2
Laird is safe pick. Montagna likely to average more, but older so could miss games. Laird has R13 bye (Montagna R11) which is better for starting players, but depends who your D1 is.
Laird D3 just
Quote from: GCSkiwi on January 31, 2017, 11:15:47 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on January 31, 2017, 11:11:25 AM
Laird v Montagna v Rance v Adams pick 2 as D2, D3
Definitely Adams, definitely not Montagna, I would probably take Rance over Laird but either is a good pick.
Ah great, thanks for your opinions. I've gone for Adams and Laird.
Quote from: EazyMoney on January 31, 2017, 11:11:25 AM
Laird v Montagna v Rance v Adams pick 2 as D2, D3
Its Laird and Rance from those for me.
Adams I have all but written off due to his upside not outweighing his injury history. Worst case scenario is he averages 100 to start the year without injury and I bring him in as one of my upgrades.
Ive been burnt too many times with injuries to be confident picking him
I tend to avoid KP defenders, I like laird out of those also. Although have had all 3 of laird Adams and Montagna at some stage.
If you do look at Adams as an upgrade target and then trade him in and he gets injured your essentially burning 2 trades. I also am looking at trying to limit my injury prone players but think Adams will have one of the better ceilings in defense so will start him, same reason il start rockliff.
Some opinions on this would be appreciated I tend to be a guns n rookie supercoacher but do see some value in a couple of mid pricers.
Montagna Jelwood Sloane Rookie Rookie
Vs
Rookie Dangerfield Beams Murphy Swallow
Current backline is Shaw Adams Laird
Current mids Pendlebury Rocky JPK Fyfe
Laird for me too. Looks to spend more time in the midfield from reports and could average 105 ppg as a result.
Quote from: Mantis on January 31, 2017, 12:12:50 PM
I tend to avoid KP defenders, I like laird out of those also. Although have had all 3 of laird Adams and Montagna at some stage.
If you do look at Adams as an upgrade target and then trade him in and he gets injured your essentially burning 2 trades. I also am looking at trying to limit my injury prone players but think Adams will have one of the better ceilings in defense so will start him, same reason il start rockliff.
Some opinions on this would be appreciated I tend to be a guns n rookie supercoacher but do see some value in a couple of mid pricers.
Montagna Jelwood Sloane Rookie Rookie
Vs
Rookie Dangerfield Beams Murphy Swallow
Current backline is Shaw Adams Laird
Current mids Pendlebury Rocky JPK Fyfe
:)
The true answer to this question really relies on what number of rookies come up on selection night. But to discount that and just look at the players mentioned.
Option 1 = 1 probable keeper in Montagna, 2 prems
Option 2. = 1 elite prem, 1 possible prem (injury prone), 1 golden goose.
Option 1 for me, cheers mate.
Unsure on this one, even using the rationalization of the above, but
Hannerbury + Petrevski-Seton v Beams + Bennell H This one on the assumption that both Beams and Bennell pull up ok after the preseason games and are selected Rd.1 :-\
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 31, 2017, 12:52:17 PM
Quote from: Mantis on January 31, 2017, 12:12:50 PM
I tend to avoid KP defenders, I like laird out of those also. Although have had all 3 of laird Adams and Montagna at some stage.
If you do look at Adams as an upgrade target and then trade him in and he gets injured your essentially burning 2 trades. I also am looking at trying to limit my injury prone players but think Adams will have one of the better ceilings in defense so will start him, same reason il start rockliff.
Some opinions on this would be appreciated I tend to be a guns n rookie supercoacher but do see some value in a couple of mid pricers.
Montagna Jelwood Sloane Rookie Rookie
Vs
Rookie Dangerfield Beams Murphy Swallow
Current backline is Shaw Adams Laird
Current mids Pendlebury Rocky JPK Fyfe
:)
The true answer to this question really relies on what number of rookies come up on selection night. But to discount that and just look at the players mentioned.
Option 1 = 1 probable keeper in Montagna, 2 prems
Option 2. = 1 elite prem, 1 possible prem (injury prone), 1 golden goose.
Option 1 for me, cheers mate.
Unsure on this one, even using the rationalization of the above, but
Hannerbury + Petrevski-Seton v Beams + Bennell H This one on the assumption that both Beams and Bennell pull up ok after the preseason games and are selected Rd.1 :-\
I would have to go with Option 2 in Danger Beams Murphy Swallow and Rookie. Just can't see anyone making the points up if Danger starts well. And I would go Beams and Bennell. Yes there is more risk but Beams can match Hanners (maybe 5ppg less) if he gets going and Bennell is a potential keeper if all goes well + you save a couple of trades. On the downside, you could end up using more trades sidewaysing Beams and Bennell and then more upgrading to the super prems like hanners. Tough one!
Grundy and docherty vs gawn and JJ?
Goldy + McGrath vs Sandi + Laird
Quote from: gloryboy on January 31, 2017, 08:11:04 PM
Quote from: uncleswagy on January 31, 2017, 05:33:59 PM
Grundy and docherty vs gawn and JJ?
Goldy and doch!
He probably already has Goldy ;)
Gawn and JJ easily though^^
Quote from: gloryboy on January 31, 2017, 11:35:09 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 31, 2017, 08:23:32 PM
Goldy + McGrath vs Sandi + Laird
Sandi and Laird
Goldy 115 + McGrath 75 v Sandi 100 + Laird 100. Sandi and Laird for mine.
Ablett M3 + D.Swallow M7 + Sandi v Beams M6 + M11 + Goldy
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on February 01, 2017, 01:51:09 PM
Quote from: gloryboy on January 31, 2017, 11:35:09 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 31, 2017, 08:23:32 PM
Goldy + McGrath vs Sandi + Laird
Sandi and Laird
Goldy 115 + McGrath 75 v Sandi 100 + Laird 100. Sandi and Laird for mine.
Ablett M3 + D.Swallow M7 + Sandi v Beams M6 + M11 + Goldy
Beams + Goldy + M11 imo
Docherty swallow goldy
Vs
TMAC ablett sandi
Quote from: eaglesman on February 02, 2017, 11:15:59 AM
Docherty swallow goldy
Vs
TMAC ablett sandi
is that a serious question? lol
Doch Swallow Goldy 10 times over versus a risk risk risk
Gawn Goldy 300-350k player or rookie
v
Gawn Sandi Selwood
300-350k player can't be Swallow
Quote from: gloryboy on February 02, 2017, 11:33:51 AM
Gawn Goldy 300-350k player or rookie
v
Gawn Sandi Selwood
300-350k player can't be Swallow
Probably Gawn Sandi and Selwood. Super premo mid in Selwood is hard to ignore.
Quote from: tommy10 on February 02, 2017, 12:42:59 PM
Quote from: gloryboy on February 02, 2017, 11:33:51 AM
Gawn Goldy 300-350k player or rookie
v
Gawn Sandi Selwood
300-350k player can't be Swallow
Probably Gawn Sandi and Selwood. Super premo mid in Selwood is hard to ignore.
A super premo ruck is also hard to ignore :P (especially with Sandi hurting his calf the other day)
Quote from: gloryboy on February 02, 2017, 11:31:57 AM
Quote from: eaglesman on February 02, 2017, 11:15:59 AM
Docherty swallow goldy
Vs
TMAC ablett sandi
is that a serious question? lol
Doch Swallow Goldy 10 times over versus a risk risk risk
Actually it was serious and I wouldn't think remotely a laughable one. Dochers(100) swallow(90) goldy(110) = 300 vs mac 95 Ablett(115) sandi (100) = 310
could easily happen - hardly laughable hardly not a worthy question
Quote from: GoLions on February 02, 2017, 12:51:17 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on February 02, 2017, 12:42:59 PM
Quote from: gloryboy on February 02, 2017, 11:33:51 AM
Gawn Goldy 300-350k player or rookie
v
Gawn Sandi Selwood
300-350k player can't be Swallow
Probably Gawn Sandi and Selwood. Super premo mid in Selwood is hard to ignore.
A super premo ruck is also hard to ignore :P (especially with Sandi hurting his calf the other day)
Hers hoping Sandi is back by round 1
Ryder vs Boyd back up for Sandi
Docherty v Simpson v Shaw
Quote from: Bubbles on February 03, 2017, 12:15:30 AM
Docherty v Simpson v Shaw
Shaw - He's a definite lock for me.
Selwood vs Priddis?
Quote from: Gambino on February 03, 2017, 01:47:51 AM
Selwood vs Priddis?
Donald!
selwood, both look like being big PODs too
Mills vs Lloyd for my D4
Quote from: TexR74 on February 03, 2017, 04:11:19 PM
Mills vs Lloyd for my D4
lloyd, never trust a second year player unless theyre a clear special talent (like bont)
No love for Elliott or Boyd
Quote from: whynot102 on February 03, 2017, 06:40:23 PM
No love for Elliott or Boyd
Tom boyd im assuming? not at all, had one good game which happened to be the grand final which is stuck in our minds, will be lucky to average 75
elliot could be a handy cash cow/stepping stone but i wont be picking him
correction: had 1 ton against brisbane in 2015. so 2 good games
Tom Mitchell vs. Jack Steven
Quote from: SilverLion on February 04, 2017, 05:25:27 PM
Tom Mitchell vs. Jack Steven
Tmitch, but Jacky boy for DT
Caddy v Toby Greene v Heeney
Quote from: SilverLion on February 04, 2017, 05:25:27 PM
Tom Mitchell vs. Jack Steven
Stevens too much of a headache, will give you 160 one week then give you 45 the next
Quote from: Bubbles on February 04, 2017, 06:17:14 PM
Caddy v Toby Greene v Heeney
See below.
Quote from: gloryboy on February 04, 2017, 10:16:40 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 04, 2017, 06:17:14 PM
Caddy v Toby Greene v Heeney
Caddy
Quote from: Judd Magic on February 04, 2017, 06:33:25 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 04, 2017, 06:17:14 PM
Caddy v Toby Greene v Heeney
Caddy.
Quote from: GoLions on February 04, 2017, 10:21:00 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 04, 2017, 06:17:14 PM
Caddy v Toby Greene v Heeney
See below.
Quote from: gloryboy on February 04, 2017, 10:16:40 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 04, 2017, 06:17:14 PM
Caddy v Toby Greene v Heeney
Caddy
Quote from: Judd Magic on February 04, 2017, 06:33:25 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 04, 2017, 06:17:14 PM
Caddy v Toby Greene v Heeney
Caddy.
Greene.... i mean caddy
(https://frinkiac.com/img/S07E06/1102717.jpg)
M6/F3
Beams/Murphy and Roughead
Vs
D.Swallow and Macrae
Hannebery or J. Selwood at M4?
Midfield is currently: Danger, Pendles, JPK, X, Treloar, Fyfe, SPP, Myers (rookie x3)
Quote from: dmac07 on February 05, 2017, 10:10:18 AM
M6/F3
Beams/Murphy and Roughead
Vs
D.Swallow and Macrae
Probs Swallow and Macrae
Quote from: bAps on February 05, 2017, 12:50:56 PM
Hannebery or J. Selwood at M4?
Midfield is currently: Danger, Pendles, JPK, X, Treloar, Fyfe, SPP, Myers (rookie x3)
I'd go Hanners, but Jelwood could be a very good POD. Don't think I've seen a single team with him yet.
Quote from: dmac07 on February 05, 2017, 10:10:18 AM
M6/F3
Beams/Murphy and Roughead
Vs
D.Swallow and Macrae
Beams because he is one of the genuine SC beasts and my man crush for him is strong... so option one....with a watch on Rough.
Quote from: bAps on February 05, 2017, 12:50:56 PM
Hannebery or J. Selwood at M4?
Midfield is currently: Danger, Pendles, JPK, X, Treloar, Fyfe, SPP, Myers (rookie x3)
Hanners
Fyfe/Bob + Eddy vs SPS + Macrae?
Quote from: Bluesman on February 05, 2017, 01:28:48 PM
Fyfe/Bob + Eddy vs SPS + Macrae?
Fyfe + Eddy
Here's a beauty !! G Logue V L Ryan ??? ??? ???
Heeney, Ben Long, Graham (Rich), Timothy Smith
vs
McCluggage, Keefe/Scharenber/Hampton, Petrevski-Setton, Ainsworth
Weighing up whether it's worth having one propable keeper and cheap bench rookies or expensive on field rookies that I'll be able to cash in on latter this season. Would love your thoughts. Thanks!
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 06, 2017, 12:39:59 AM
Quote from: Bluesman on February 05, 2017, 01:28:48 PM
Fyfe/Bob + Eddy vs SPS + Macrae?
Fyfe + Eddy
Here's a beauty !! G Logue V L Ryan ??? ??? ???
I prefer Logue if he's named, have both atm though
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 06, 2017, 01:29:47 AM
Heeney, Ben Long, Graham (Rich), Timothy Smith
vs
McCluggage, Keefe/Scharenber/Hampton, Petrevski-Setton, Ainsworth
Weighing up whether it's worth having one propable keeper and cheap bench rookies or expensive on field rookies that I'll be able to cash in on latter this season. Would love your thoughts. Thanks!
Hard to say before round 1 teams are out :p
Obviously if enough cheaper rookies are named then you'd prefer to squeeze in Heeney, but if not then will have to pay up for the higher priced rookies
Macrae & Howe v Miller & Shaw
Quote from: enzedder on February 06, 2017, 09:50:02 AM
Macrae & Howe v Miller & Shaw
Macrae and Howe easily for me.
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on February 06, 2017, 10:29:26 AM
Quote from: enzedder on February 06, 2017, 09:50:02 AM
Macrae & Howe v Miller & Shaw
Macrae and Howe easily for me.
Miller and Shaw for me :p
But not much in it tbh. Macrae and Howe a bit safer, but tbh i reckon you have to start Shaw, would try and fit him in somewhere if you can.
McRae Bowes v Bennell CEY
(100 70 v 95 85)?
Quote from: gloryboy on February 06, 2017, 12:18:55 PM
McRae Bowes v Bennell CEY
(100 70 v 95 85)?
Macrae and Bowes. Macrae a guaranteed keeper, whereas Harley is much riskier. And whilst Bowes may not score as well as CEY (assuming CEY is best 22 for the Crows), he should make more cash due to his lower starting price, and seeing as neither will be keepers, may as well go with Bowes.
M6/F3
D.Swallow + Macrae
Beams + Ellis-Yolmen
Hannebery + Ainsworth
Who knows if Ainsworth will even line up R1 I like Ellis Yolmen so him and Beams
Quote from: dmac07 on February 07, 2017, 07:40:33 PM
M6/F3
D.Swallow + Macrae
Beams + Ellis-Yolmen
Hannebery + Ainsworth
Tough but I like D Swallow + Macrae. The other option I would consider is Hannebery + Ainsworth.
Quote from: shaker on February 07, 2017, 07:48:30 PM
Who knows if Ainsworth will even line up R1 I like Ellis Yolmen so him and Beams
It's not like CEY is a lock either
Quote from: TomK on February 08, 2017, 12:05:40 AM
Quote from: shaker on February 07, 2017, 07:48:30 PM
Who knows if Ainsworth will even line up R1 I like Ellis Yolmen so him and Beams
It's not like CEY is a lock either
True but more of a chance than Ainsworth every year people say all these 1st year rookies are going to play R1 and every year most don't
Hrovat v CEY (assuming both cement into best 22)
Hrovat (301k)
2013 7 63.9
2014 12 74.9
2015 7 62.0
2016 4 69.2
CEY (304k)
2014 1 9.0
2015 11 74.4
2016 2 80.0
Quote from: gloryboy on February 08, 2017, 01:29:29 PM
Hrovat v CEY (assuming both cement into best 22)
Hrovat (301k)
2013 7 63.9
2014 12 74.9
2015 7 62.0
2016 4 69.2
CEY (304k)
2014 1 9.0
2015 11 74.4
2016 2 80.0
I guess its almost time to start looking at SC since NBA fantasy is winding down. :D
Theres a bit of buzz that Riley Knight is looking good and possibly in line to move into the midfield after the departure of Lyons. Forward as well and 100K cheaper than the 2 mentioned above...
Pendles + rook (Bowes atm)
vs
Beams + Roughead
Quote from: js19 on February 10, 2017, 06:01:41 AM
Pendles + rook (Bowes atm)
vs
Beams + Roughead
Pendles + rookie. Similar scoring and cash generation, less risk/unknown
Quote from: gloryboy on February 10, 2017, 10:02:49 AM
Quote from: js19 on February 10, 2017, 06:01:41 AM
Pendles + rook (Bowes atm)
vs
Beams + Roughead
Pendles + rookie. Similar scoring and cash generation, less risk/unknown
Pendles + rookie for me.
Same sort of question- Sandi + D.Swallow vs Goldy + rookie
Pros and cons are so close.
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on February 10, 2017, 10:46:45 AM
Quote from: gloryboy on February 10, 2017, 10:02:49 AM
Quote from: js19 on February 10, 2017, 06:01:41 AM
Pendles + rook (Bowes atm)
vs
Beams + Roughead
Pendles + rookie. Similar scoring and cash generation, less risk/unknown
Pendles + rookie for me.
Same sort of question- Sandi + D.Swallow vs Goldy + rookie
Pros and cons are so close.
Tough one, but have Sandi and Swallow atm with Ryder as cover. So if you have ruck cover for the odd games that Sandi may miss, then this option.Goldy's injury is a slight worry too so need to watch him closely.
Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list
Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty
I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^
Quote from: Bubbles on February 10, 2017, 04:21:24 PM
Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list
Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty
I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^
Cant really go wrong with either,ill say sloane though, favourable early schedule and you wont have any players on the same team which some people try to avoid
Sloanes been there since my first team and is a rock solid choice but I just don't think he will get the monster scores like some of those others will
Quote from: Bubbles on February 10, 2017, 04:21:24 PM
Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list
Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty
I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^
I like Selwood personally. He is in my team.
Ok sorry for being long winded here...
Watson(m5) + Jacobs(r1)
Vs
Powell-Pepper(m8) + Gawn(r1) + 150k to possibly upgrade O'Meara if not r1 starter.
Really love Jobe I don't think I can live without him in my team lol...
Quote from: Bubbles on February 10, 2017, 04:21:24 PM
Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list
Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty
I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^
Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty
Quote from: _wato on February 10, 2017, 06:56:25 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 10, 2017, 04:21:24 PM
Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list
Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty
I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^
Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty
Rocky > Treloar > JPK > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty... similar thinking... Rocky though.
Quote from: enzedder on February 11, 2017, 07:14:40 AM
Quote from: _wato on February 10, 2017, 06:56:25 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 10, 2017, 04:21:24 PM
Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list
Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty
I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^
Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty
Rocky > Treloar > JPK > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty... similar thinking... Rocky though.
Wow, lot of Rocky love :o
Treloar > Sloane > JPK > Rocky > Jelly > Dusty
Goldy + Ainsworth + 8k v Ryder + Sandilands + 68k
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 11, 2017, 11:39:54 AM
Goldy + Ainsworth + 8k v Ryder + Sandilands + 68k
Option 1. option 2 is too risky for me. We dont know how high Ryder will be able to average after returning from a years suspension and only averaging roughly 86 his previous season. Yes Sandilands has huge value, but at 34 yrs old will he be able to produce an high enough output and avoid getting injured?
Quote from: dmac07 on February 11, 2017, 10:45:51 AM
Quote from: enzedder on February 11, 2017, 07:14:40 AM
Quote from: _wato on February 10, 2017, 06:56:25 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 10, 2017, 04:21:24 PM
Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list
Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty
I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^
Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty
Rocky > Treloar > JPK > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty... similar thinking... Rocky though.
Wow, lot of Rocky love :o
Treloar > Sloane > JPK > Rocky > Jelly > Dusty
Weird that you have Rocky in the middle there. From an avg perspective, he is clearly the best of this lot, and from a durability perspective, clearly the worst :P
Quote from: Samsturmfels on February 11, 2017, 01:08:08 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 11, 2017, 11:39:54 AM
Goldy + Ainsworth + 8k v Ryder + Sandilands + 68k
Option 1. option 2 is too risky for me. We dont know how high Ryder will be able to average after returning from a years suspension and only averaging roughly 86 his previous season. Yes Sandilands has huge value, but at 34 yrs old will he be able to produce an high enough output and avoid getting injured?
Yeah go option 1, but keep an eye on Goldy throughout the pre-season
Hanners vs. Treloar?
Quote from: BomberSam on February 12, 2017, 02:54:39 AM
Hanners vs. Treloar?
probably cant go wrong with either, both have pretty much the same selection% too
coin flip for me
Beams and sandi 740k
Vs
Swallow and stef Martin 766k
Quote from: eaglesman on February 12, 2017, 04:03:13 PM
Beams and sandi 740k
Vs
Swallow and stef Martin 766k
Less risk with this option
Quote from: dmac07 on February 11, 2017, 10:45:51 AM
Quote from: enzedder on February 11, 2017, 07:14:40 AM
Quote from: _wato on February 10, 2017, 06:56:25 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 10, 2017, 04:21:24 PM
Alright this is gonna be a pretty long list
Selwood v Sloane v Rockliff v Trealor v JPK v Dusty
I'm rolling with 5 premo mids I have Dangerfield, Hanners, Pendles and Fyfe and then not sure who out of these guys ^
Rocky > JPK > Treloar > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty
Rocky > Treloar > JPK > Jelly > Sloane > Dusty... similar thinking... Rocky though.
Wow, lot of Rocky love :o
Treloar > Sloane > JPK > Rocky > Jelly > Dusty
the lack of love for Jelwood is just amazing. :o he has missed going 110+ once in the last 8 seasons, and Treloar has been there once.
Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy
Quote from: _wato on February 12, 2017, 11:16:17 PM
Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy
Apparently Gunno is a pretty safe option. If this is correct, I'd go with Gunno and Swallow. Beams and Roughy more upside by a long shot, but the other option is safer. Loving Roughy though, not sure whether I'll fit him in or not yet.
Quote from: _wato on February 12, 2017, 11:16:17 PM
Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy
Scooter isn't SC relevant IMO.
Beams and Roughy have a lot more upside than Swallow/Gunston but Swallow is flying and Gunston is solid for a 90-100 season.
The safe option is Swallow/Gunston but Beams and Rough could score 220 a week between them.
I haven't told you anything you don't know ha but you don't win SC without taking risks. Beams/Roughy for me.
Quote from: AaronKirk on February 13, 2017, 02:20:57 PM
Quote from: _wato on February 12, 2017, 11:16:17 PM
Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy
Scooter isn't SC relevant IMO.
Beams and Roughy have a lot more upside than Swallow/Gunston but Swallow is flying and Gunston is solid for a 90-100 season.
The safe option is Swallow/Gunston but Beams and Rough could score 220 a week between them.
I haven't told you anything you don't know ha but you don't win SC without taking risks. Beams/Roughy for me.
Any reason why you don't see Scooter as relevant? Yep, Beams Roughy is the obvious choice but chances are Beams won't make Round 1.
Quote from: _wato on February 13, 2017, 02:33:50 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on February 13, 2017, 02:20:57 PM
Quote from: _wato on February 12, 2017, 11:16:17 PM
Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy
Scooter isn't SC relevant IMO.
Beams and Roughy have a lot more upside than Swallow/Gunston but Swallow is flying and Gunston is solid for a 90-100 season.
The safe option is Swallow/Gunston but Beams and Rough could score 220 a week between them.
I haven't told you anything you don't know ha but you don't win SC without taking risks. Beams/Roughy for me.
Any reason why you don't see Scooter as relevant? Yep, Beams Roughy is the obvious choice but chances are Beams won't make Round 1.
His best season average in the last 3 years is 80. IMO he is likely to be playing a tagging role I don't expect him to average much more than that 80. He won't average enough to be a keeper and won't make enough cash to justify picking him over a rookie.
Quote from: AaronKirk on February 13, 2017, 02:36:25 PM
Quote from: _wato on February 13, 2017, 02:33:50 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on February 13, 2017, 02:20:57 PM
Quote from: _wato on February 12, 2017, 11:16:17 PM
Scooter/Swallow + Gunston v Beams + Roughy
Scooter isn't SC relevant IMO.
Beams and Roughy have a lot more upside than Swallow/Gunston but Swallow is flying and Gunston is solid for a 90-100 season.
The safe option is Swallow/Gunston but Beams and Rough could score 220 a week between them.
I haven't told you anything you don't know ha but you don't win SC without taking risks. Beams/Roughy for me.
Any reason why you don't see Scooter as relevant? Yep, Beams Roughy is the obvious choice but chances are Beams won't make Round 1.
His best season average in the last 3 years is 80. IMO he is likely to be playing a tagging role I don't expect him to average much more than that 80. He won't average enough to be a keeper and won't make enough cash to justify picking him over a rookie.
I don't think he'll tag, I think he'll go back to what he was very good at. Run with role but with the freedom to attack and get his own footy. Guthrie the same, but Scooter a better player. There's a spot in that centre spot to help shoulder the inside work of Dangerwood and I reckon it's Scooter's spot to lose. He averaged 75 in 3 games last year with no preseason. This is his first full preseason in ages and has history of 105+ scoring. Look at Mengelola when given a chance, averaged 100 in 6 games. Think you underestimate how good Scooter is when fit. He's relevant.
Shaw, Gunston, Ainsworth
Trealor, Sloane, Smith (102k rookie from Melbourne)
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2017, 03:11:02 PM
Shaw, Gunston, Ainsworth
Trealor, Sloane, Smith (102k rookie from Melbourne)
2nd option if Smith gets a game. What are his chances though?
Quote from: quinny88 on February 13, 2017, 05:07:24 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2017, 03:11:02 PM
Shaw, Gunston, Ainsworth
Trealor, Sloane, Smith (102k rookie from Melbourne)
2nd option if Smith gets a game. What are his chances though?
According to the Melbourne supporters here he is a real chance to play early.
Hogan and Watts are the two certainties but Smith, Weideman and Pederson are all fighting for that third tall spot from what I've heard.
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2017, 05:44:28 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 13, 2017, 05:07:24 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2017, 03:11:02 PM
Shaw, Gunston, Ainsworth
Trealor, Sloane, Smith (102k rookie from Melbourne)
2nd option if Smith gets a game. What are his chances though?
According to the Melbourne supporters here he is a real chance to play early.
Hogan and Watts are the two certainties but Smith, Weideman and Pederson are all fighting for that third tall spot from what I've heard.
ive even seen some people say hogan watts and 2 smith weids and pedo in the 22, assuming that would mean watts plays up the ground more
Quote from: uncleswagy on February 13, 2017, 07:29:14 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2017, 05:44:28 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 13, 2017, 05:07:24 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2017, 03:11:02 PM
Shaw, Gunston, Ainsworth
Trealor, Sloane, Smith (102k rookie from Melbourne)
2nd option if Smith gets a game. What are his chances though?
According to the Melbourne supporters here he is a real chance to play early.
Hogan and Watts are the two certainties but Smith, Weideman and Pederson are all fighting for that third tall spot from what I've heard.
ive even seen some people say hogan watts and 2 smith weids and pedo in the 22, assuming that would mean watts plays up the ground more
Lol how many spots on the field do Melbourne followers think they have? Surely Watts Hogan Weidemann after another preseason. They're the future.
Quote from: _wato on February 13, 2017, 07:37:43 PM
Quote from: uncleswagy on February 13, 2017, 07:29:14 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2017, 05:44:28 PM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 13, 2017, 05:07:24 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2017, 03:11:02 PM
Shaw, Gunston, Ainsworth
Trealor, Sloane, Smith (102k rookie from Melbourne)
2nd option if Smith gets a game. What are his chances though?
According to the Melbourne supporters here he is a real chance to play early.
Hogan and Watts are the two certainties but Smith, Weideman and Pederson are all fighting for that third tall spot from what I've heard.
ive even seen some people say hogan watts and 2 smith weids and pedo in the 22, assuming that would mean watts plays up the ground more
Lol how many spots on the field do Melbourne followers think they have? Surely Watts Hogan Weidemann after another preseason. They're the future.
haha good call, i reckon your right though, id put my money on those three being the ones
Jobe & Swallow vs. Titch & Bowes
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 13, 2017, 08:48:57 PM
Jobe & Swallow vs. Titch & Bowes
Titch and Bowes easily for me
Macrae vs. Caddy?
Head says Macrae, other strange forces say Caddy.
Quote from: BomberSam on February 13, 2017, 10:43:16 PM
Macrae vs. Caddy?
Head says Macrae, other strange forces say Caddy.
Macrae definitely safer to start but don't be shocked to see Caddy have a big season and push 100
Quote from: BomberSam on February 13, 2017, 10:43:16 PM
Macrae vs. Caddy?
Head says Macrae, other strange forces say Caddy.
if what they are saying about dusty spending a lot more time forward is true then caddy could be the third main mid in richmond (behind cotch and prestia), where as i think mccrea is about fifth in the dogs (behind bont, libba, hunter, dahl). personally i see them as pretty much dead even in what theyll produce sc wise, have both in my squad atm
M6/R2
Bont & Witts vs Swallow & Grundy
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on January 06, 2017, 11:39:01 AM
Quote from: Holz on January 06, 2017, 11:01:29 AM
one im struggling with is Taylor Adams v Tom Mcondald.
Tmac had a big last 2/3 of the season and gives some much needed cash.
You know how hard it was for me to give up TMac in Worlds - I rate him so highly and he is locked in my side for 2017. Will be a POD, and I think he can go 95+ comfortably
Adams will be super popular, but I can't see myself starting him. I'm sure he will also go 90+ but he tends to miss games and Collingwood have so much midfield depth so I'm a little uncertain on how he will go - prefe to wait and see so possible upgrade target for me
Personally I'm going for Tom McDonald as well, for the exact same reasons. However if Adams stays fit for the whole season he could definitely rack up some big scores.
DEF: Jake Lloyd, has massive potential to score if he improves his disposal, especially tempting at 460k
MID: Matty Crouch, expected to explode this year and will also have more time on the ball with the Crows planning to reduce Scotty Thompsons midfield minutes and the departure of lyons, priced nicely at 505k however he is yet to play a full season.
RUCK: Stef Martin, has had averages of 111 and 110 in past seasons, however burnt me for the most of last season with an average of 89. This years ruck stocks are fragile and priced at 488k also a factor. Still on my never again list after starting him last year.
FWD: Touk Miller, priced at 428k, has huge scoring potential, FWD/MID DPP, scored 6 tons last season including 3 in the last 3 rounds. The only catch is the return and addition of many suns midfielders, including GAJ, Swallow, Lyons and Hanley, may prevent him from getting enough midfield minutes to haul some big scores
S Martin, Heeney, J Roughead, Gallacci V Sandilands, Caddy, Ryder, McCluggage
Quote from: dmac07 on February 14, 2017, 12:29:35 AM
M6/R2
Bont & Witts vs Swallow & Grundy
Swallow + Grundy imo
Quote from: Fid on February 14, 2017, 07:30:07 PM
S Martin, Heeney, J Roughead, Gallacci V Sandilands, Caddy, Ryder, McCluggage
first group, cant trust sandi
Treloar, Sloane, Bont
Quote from: Padawan on February 15, 2017, 12:19:33 PM
Treloar, Sloane, Bont
Sloane, has a very favourable first 10-12 rounds
S martin, Swallow vs Sandi SMurf
Pendles and Vince/JJ vs Treloar and Rance
Quote from: tommy10 on February 16, 2017, 12:38:47 AM
Pendles and Vince/JJ vs Treloar and Rance
Can't go wrong either way, but I would go for Treloar + Rance
Treloar and Rance in my squad
Shaw, Rance, Howe. Vs Docherty, Laird, McDonald
Rance, Macrae, MM, Sandi, Lycett (D1,F2,M6,R2,F3) v Laird, Gunston, Treloar, Stef, $117k rook (D1,F2,M6,R2,F3)
Quote from: _wato on February 16, 2017, 01:19:05 PM
Rance, Macrae, MM, Sandi, Lycett (D1,F2,M6,R2,F3) v Laird, Gunston, Treloar, Stef, $117k rook (D1,F2,M6,R2,F3)
2 by a country mile.
Quote from: LordSneeze on February 16, 2017, 01:41:43 PM
Quote from: _wato on February 16, 2017, 01:19:05 PM
Rance, Macrae, MM, Sandi, Lycett (D1,F2,M6,R2,F3) v Laird, Gunston, Treloar, Stef, $117k rook (D1,F2,M6,R2,F3)
2 by a country mile.
That's interesting then. Assuming all are on field
Option 1 - 95, 100, 105, 100, 95 = 495 / Option 2 - 95, 95, 115, 105, 65 = 475
Any reason why you say 2? Less risk?
JJK vs Lynch vs Riewoldt?
Quote from: TexR74 on February 16, 2017, 03:28:47 PM
JJK vs Lynch vs Riewoldt?
NRoo or Gunston if you want a KPF
Okay and my follow up is Sandilands and Brayshaw or Witts and Riewoldt
Not a big fan of either option but if had to pick then witts and Riewoldt so ya at least have 1 premium.
Thurlow & Jelwood//Treloar
Vs
Shaw & D.Swallow
Quote from: Mantis on February 16, 2017, 08:18:34 PM
Not a big fan of either option but if had to pick then witts and Riewoldt so ya at least have 1 premium.
Thurlow & Jelwood//Treloar
Vs
Shaw & D.Swallow
Shaw and D.Swallow imo
Cheers mate it is the better option to for balance. It was for D3 and M7 haha
Titch, stef, roughie v swallow goldy macrae
Would be a lot more confident with your second option mate. Gold will be top 3 if not top 2 in his position as will macrae, swallow allows ya a stepping stone trade to who ever (titch) if you still want him.
Quote from: Gandalf123 on February 16, 2017, 10:50:08 PM
Titch, stef, roughie v swallow goldy macrae
Quote from: Mantis on February 16, 2017, 10:58:58 PM
Would be a lot more confident with your second option mate. Gold will be top 3 if not top 2 in his position as will macrae, swallow allows ya a stepping stone trade to who ever (titch) if you still want him.
Yeah, I think Swallow + Macrae + Goldy is the better option as well.
McVeigh vs Z. Williams
&
McRae vs Dalhaus
&
O'Meara vs D. Swallow
Quote from: billnats on February 17, 2017, 10:07:49 PM
McVeigh vs Z. Williams
&
McRae vs Dalhaus
&
O'Meara vs D. Swallow
Z. Williams + Dahlhaus + D. Swallow
Pendles and Prestia vs Treloar and Bont
Quote from: tommy10 on February 17, 2017, 10:54:59 PM
Pendles and Prestia vs Treloar and Bont
Treloar and Bont. Prestia the only poor option here.
Averages: Prestia/ Pendles = 102.9
Treloar/ Bont = 98.6
If you're a statistics man, make of that what you will :)
Roughy v Macrae
Quote from: ronl on February 18, 2017, 10:25:55 AM
Averages: Prestia/ Pendles = 102.9
Treloar/ Bont = 98.6
If you're a statistics man, make of that what you will :)
Exactly why I asked this. Treloar and Bont look good but now I'm thinking Pendles who is super consistent and Prestia seems to be killing it in the preseason, and could really avg 110 imo. On the other hand Bont and Treloar can take their game to another level, which could mean an increase on their avg. to 115...
Cripps and two cheap rookies or swallow roughy and expensive rookie
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 18, 2017, 10:31:13 AM
Roughy v Macrae
Rough + 150k vs Macrae
I've gone off Macrae, reckon 100 is his max which is still great for a forward, but he has a lot of poor scores in between good scores. Use that 150k elsewhere and get Rough I think
Quote from: uncleswagy on February 19, 2017, 06:24:29 PM
Cripps and two cheap rookies or swallow roughy and expensive rookie
Try and find someone else to dump so you can have all 3 of Cripps, Swallow and Rough
As for me, 1 of
Wingard vs Heeney vs Touk
Currently have Heeney, but reckon all 3 could be good
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 19, 2017, 09:02:55 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 18, 2017, 10:31:13 AM
Roughy v Macrae
Rough + 150k vs Macrae
I've gone off Macrae, reckon 100 is his max which is still great for a forward, but he has a lot of poor scores in between good scores. Use that 150k elsewhere and get Rough I think
Quote from: uncleswagy on February 19, 2017, 06:24:29 PM
Cripps and two cheap rookies or swallow roughy and expensive rookie
Try and find someone else to dump so you can have all 3 of Cripps, Swallow and Rough
As for me, 1 of
Wingard vs Heeney vs Touk
Currently have Heeney, but reckon all 3 could be good
Agree with you on mccrea for sure.
with the team structure ive got now theres really no room for dumping someone else to make cash unless i got sandi which i dont wanna do, could dump bont instead as cripps is more of a pod
currently have heeney too but strongly considering going the chad
Adams vs Zak Jones +200k
Titch v Bont
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 19, 2017, 09:56:38 PM
Titch v Bont
At this stage, Bont. Haven't seen Titch in the poos and wees yet, we'll have to see how he goes before making this call.
Swallow vs. McLuggage vs. Taranto
leaning towards Swallow as he's proven, but an extra $80k would be nice
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 20, 2017, 11:31:59 AM
Swallow vs. McLuggage vs. Taranto
leaning towards Swallow as he's proven, but an extra $80k would be nice
Don't start with Taranto, I'll doubt he'll get game time. I would start with both Clugg and Swallow.
Priddis and Hartlett v Beams and Laird
Hartlett/Laird will be D3 and Priddis/Beams M6
The basic question for me can Hartlett get back to his 90+averages from 2011 - 2015?
Priddis is superconsistent but would only expect 105/110 for him
Beams when fit capable of 115+ but his lingering fitness a concern.
Laird I expect 90/95
So not a lot of difference.
Quote from: Ringo on February 20, 2017, 02:57:38 PM
Priddis and Hartlett v Beams and Laird
Hartlett/Laird will be D3 and Priddis/Beams M6
The basic question for me can Hartlett get back to his 90+averages from 2011 - 2015?
Priddis is superconsistent but would only expect 105/110 for him
Beams when fit capable of 115+ but his lingering fitness a concern.
Laird I expect 90/95
So not a lot of difference.
Tough one, I'm waiting to watch hartlett this week as he is one I'm keen on, can't bring myself to trust beams, not a priddis fan but have had him before and is most definitely one of the more consistent SC'ers out there, I'd go the first option.
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 20, 2017, 11:31:59 AM
Swallow vs. McLuggage vs. Taranto
leaning towards Swallow as he's proven, but an extra $80k would be nice
Swallow, come Rd 9 will be an easy trade into whichever Superprem you are missing. Also likely to outscore both of Mclug and Taranto by 20 pts a game and no JS risk. harder decision would be Swallor or JOM?
Quote from: Ringo on February 20, 2017, 02:57:38 PM
Priddis and Hartlett v Beams and Laird
Hartlett/Laird will be D3 and Priddis/Beams M6
The basic question for me can Hartlett get back to his 90+averages from 2011 - 2015?
Priddis is superconsistent but would only expect 105/110 for him
Beams when fit capable of 115+ but his lingering fitness a concern.
Laird I expect 90/95
So not a lot of difference.
Am I missing something?
HH/Beams more or less same price but Priddis vs Laird 70k difference
So you can basically pick any other mid? I'd grab other mids before Prid at that price
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 20, 2017, 05:36:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on February 20, 2017, 02:57:38 PM
Priddis and Hartlett v Beams and Laird
Hartlett/Laird will be D3 and Priddis/Beams M6
The basic question for me can Hartlett get back to his 90+averages from 2011 - 2015?
Priddis is superconsistent but would only expect 105/110 for him
Beams when fit capable of 115+ but his lingering fitness a concern.
Laird I expect 90/95
So not a lot of difference.
Am I missing something?
HH/Beams more or less same price but Priddis vs Laird 70k difference
So you can basically pick any other mid? I'd grab other mids before Prid at that price
To explain a little better RD
It is the combination that is the issue - If I go Priddis then Hartlett is the defender I can afford but if I drop Priddis to Beams I can go Laird.
Priddis vs Rocky
Adams vs Tmac vs Jmac vs Laird
Macrae vs Caddy vs Higgins
D3, M4 and F2 have me pulling my hair out. I keep chopping and changing each person
Quote from: NickyBoy on February 20, 2017, 07:28:03 PM
Priddis vs Rocky
Adams vs Tmac vs Jmac vs Laird
Macrae vs Caddy vs Higgins
D3, M4 and F2 have me pulling my hair out. I keep chopping and changing each person
Rocky, Laird, Macrae
Rocky, Laird, Caddy
Quote from: Fid on February 20, 2017, 07:58:41 PM
Rocky, Laird, Caddy
Rocky, Adams, Caddy (reckon Miller is a better option than Caddy)
(Tmitch+ Beams) vs (Rockliff + O'Meara + 75k)
Quote from: Samsturmfels on February 21, 2017, 12:22:17 AM
(Tmitch+ Beams) vs (Rockliff + O'Meara + 75k)
Rockliff +O'Meara + 75k because Beams isn't fully fit.
Roughy (F4) vs. Jobe (M6)
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 21, 2017, 09:31:16 AM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on February 21, 2017, 12:22:17 AM
(Tmitch+ Beams) vs (Rockliff + O'Meara + 75k)
Rockliff +O'Meara + 75k because Beams isn't fully fit.
Also some uncertainty with Tmitch moving to the hawks. I'm hoping he plays a JLT game
Hartlett + Swallow v Docherty + Rookie
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 22, 2017, 06:21:34 PM
Hartlett + Swallow v Docherty + Rookie
Hammer and Spitter, but see what Hammer's role is looking like throughout the JLT
Rank 'em.
Caddy, Heeney, Macrae, Rougy, Ryder.
Quote from: jvalles69 on February 22, 2017, 08:15:42 PM
Rank 'em.
Caddy, Heeney, Macrae, Rougy, Ryder.
Price order for me. Sorry that's not too helpful!
Caddy, Macrae, Ryder, Heeney, Rougy,
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 22, 2017, 08:57:08 PM
Quote from: Fid on February 22, 2017, 08:35:06 PM
Caddy, Macrae, Ryder, Heeney, Rougy,
Quote from: Fid on February 22, 2017, 08:35:06 PM
Caddy, Macrae, Ryder, Heeney, Rougy,
Do y'all think Caddy is better than Macrae?
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 22, 2017, 09:42:18 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 22, 2017, 08:57:08 PM
Quote from: Fid on February 22, 2017, 08:35:06 PM
Caddy, Macrae, Ryder, Heeney, Rougy,
Quote from: Fid on February 22, 2017, 08:35:06 PM
Caddy, Macrae, Ryder, Heeney, Rougy,
Do y'all think Caddy is better than Macrae?
They are very close imo. Caddy will improve with more opportunity @ richmond compared to last season alongside dangerfield. Macrae spent 40% of game time in the fwd line for only 2 goals last season. My money will be on Caddy to have a better season at his new club with more opportunity. (last year Caddy averaged more than a goal a game and was rated No 1 for a mid/fwd for score involvements)
Quote from: jvalles69 on February 22, 2017, 08:15:42 PM
Rank 'em.
Caddy, Heeney, Macrae, Rougy, Ryder.
Macrae > Caddy > Ryder > Heeney > Rough
Quote from: jvalles69 on February 22, 2017, 08:15:42 PM
Rank 'em.
Caddy, Heeney, Macrae, Rougy, Ryder.
McCrea >/= Caddy . heeney . rough . ryder
Quote from: jvalles69 on February 22, 2017, 08:15:42 PM
Rank 'em.
Caddy, Heeney, Macrae, Rougy, Ryder.
Ryder 92-95, Macrae 90+, Caddy 95+, Heeny 85-100, Roughy 90-100
Quote from: crowls on February 23, 2017, 12:57:12 AM
Quote from: jvalles69 on February 22, 2017, 08:15:42 PM
Rank 'em.
Caddy, Heeney, Macrae, Rougy, Ryder.
Ryder 92-95, Macrae 90+, Caddy 95+, Heeny 85-100, Roughy 90-100
Ryder - 90 (starting to get tempted on him given a few things I have seen at the port trainings.)
Macrae - 95
Caddy - 90 (Could be anything really)
Heeney - 85
Roughy - 90
Grundy + Beams + Roughy
Gawn + Beams + Turner/MccCarth/M.Kennnedy
Grundy Ablett/JPK + Turner/MccCarth/M.Kennnedy
Quote from: Holz on February 23, 2017, 12:14:08 PM
Grundy + Beams + Roughy
Gawn + Beams + Turner/MccCarth/M.Kennnedy
Grundy Ablett/JPK + Turner/MccCarth/M.Kennnedy
So I gather you've got roughly 1.25-1.3m for those 3 spots?
I'd be inclined to get a cheaper rookie over those 3 suggested forwards to free up 60k or so, Black from Geelong is looking the goods as an option.
If I had to pick from your 3 options, I'd go for option 2, Beams when fit is easily a top-10 mid. His fitness is a risk though, and the 60k difference between Kennedy and Turner could become around 120k if you went Black, allowing Beams up to a 550k mid, not far off Bont/Titch etc.
Quote from: MC on February 23, 2017, 02:08:32 PM
Quote from: Holz on February 23, 2017, 12:14:08 PM
Grundy + Beams + Roughy
Gawn + Beams + Turner/MccCarth/M.Kennnedy
Grundy Ablett/JPK + Turner/MccCarth/M.Kennnedy
So I gather you've got roughly 1.25-1.3m for those 3 spots?
I'd be inclined to get a cheaper rookie over those 3 suggested forwards to free up 60k or so, Black from Geelong is looking the goods as an option.
If I had to pick from your 3 options, I'd go for option 2, Beams when fit is easily a top-10 mid. His fitness is a risk though, and the 60k difference between Kennedy and Turner could become around 120k if you went Black, allowing Beams up to a 550k mid, not far off Bont/Titch etc.
I got Black Schoey and Eddy
Tom Mitchell/Bont + Roughead v Beams + Macrae
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 23, 2017, 09:20:02 PM
Tom Mitchell/Bont + Roughead v Beams + Macrae
Bont and Roughy
Treloar vs JPK. Already have Danger and Pendles.
Quote from: tommy10 on February 24, 2017, 12:04:00 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 23, 2017, 09:20:02 PM
Tom Mitchell/Bont + Roughead v Beams + Macrae
Bont and Roughy
Treloar vs JPK. Already have Danger and Pendles.
JPK for me.
Quote from: tommy10 on February 24, 2017, 12:04:00 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 23, 2017, 09:20:02 PM
Tom Mitchell/Bont + Roughead v Beams + Macrae
Bont and Roughy
Treloar vs JPK. Already have Danger and Pendles.
JPK for consistent excellence, Treloar for upside.
Struggling for my M3. Really want JPK Hanners but I'm like $2k off and if things don't lookup on the rookie front it's probs gonna stay that way.
So Neale v Treloar v Jelly.
Leaning towards Jelly but I love Treloar, just don't love all 3 pies on ballers. Think Neale can only improve but he averaged like 33 touches for a 112 average. Fyfe will take so much attention off him which is a HUGE upside
Quote from: _wato on February 24, 2017, 01:00:55 PM
Struggling for my M3. Really want JPK Hanners but I'm like $2k off and if things don't lookup on the rookie front it's probs gonna stay that way.
So Neale v Treloar v Jelly.
Leaning towards Jelly but I love Treloar, just don't love all 3 pies on ballers. Think Neale can only improve but he averaged like 33 touches for a 112 average. Fyfe will take so much attention off him which is a HUGE upside
Selwood is very helpful in the byes trying to get him in my team I have gone Neale over Fyfe and would love Treloar but can't have everyone so that is probably the hardest choice I have seen .... Selwood for his R12 bye
Selwood is one of the few options in M3-4 area with R12 bye. Only in last couple of days as I assess my team options for byes is he coming in to consideration. Orginal plan was upgrade mid year. Now may have to take selwood instead of Treloar.
Same thing in forwards, finding Caddy is now a maybe because of bye coverage. T Lynch is out due to already have 4 out rd9 and that is all I am willing to sacrifice.
JPK (11) v Treloar (13) v Hannebury (11) v Selwood (12) v Bont (11) v Titch (13) v Priddis (12) v D Martin (12)
Pick 3 to start and already have 11 players in Rd13 bye before selecting these 3.
Quote from: crowls on February 24, 2017, 02:21:39 PM
Selwood is one of the few options in M3-4 area with R12 bye. Only in last couple of days as I assess my team options for byes is he coming in to consideration. Orginal plan was upgrade mid year. Now may have to take selwood instead of Treloar.
Same thing in forwards, finding Caddy is now a maybe because of bye coverage. T Lynch is out due to already have 4 out rd9 and that is all I am willing to sacrifice.
JPK (11) v Treloar (13) v Hannebury (11) v Selwood (12) v Bont (11) v Titch (13) v Priddis (12) v D Martin (12)
Pick 3 to start and already have 11 players in Rd13 bye before selecting these 3.
Selwood Hanners and Bont if you are ok R11 bye if not and you need another R12 bye I would take Dusty for his POD value
:-\
Which to start with :- T Adams or R Laird. Will start 1 and upgrade the other. ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 24, 2017, 03:42:30 PM
:-\
Which to start with :- T Adams or R Laird. Will start 1 and upgrade the other. ;)
Start with Adams
Rance vs Tmac vs Laird?
Currently have both Rance and Tmac. Tmac's end to last season was amazing and feel he is fairly underpriced and see him as a top 10 defender. Rance has been ultra consistent for a while now, but had a slightly interrupted pre-season. Managed to get a bit extra cash today after getting some dirt over the fellas at SC HQ, so can now either turn Tmac into Laird, or just straight swap Rance for Laird. Leaning towards the Tmac + Laird combo now.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 24, 2017, 03:42:30 PM
:-\
Which to start with :- T Adams or R Laird. Will start 1 and upgrade the other. ;)
Adams for mine
Quote from: GoLions on February 24, 2017, 06:10:02 PM
Rance vs Tmac vs Laird?
Currently have both Rance and Tmac. Tmac's end to last season was amazing and feel he is fairly underpriced and see him as a top 10 defender. Rance has been ultra consistent for a while now, but had a slightly interrupted pre-season. Managed to get a bit extra cash today after getting some dirt over the fellas at SC HQ, so can now either turn Tmac into Laird, or just straight swap Rance for Laird. Leaning towards the Tmac + Laird combo now.
Laird > Tmac > Rance
Rance the most reliable, lokely to play every game and average 95, but this year there seems to be multiple options capable of going 100+ in defense when previously 95 was good enough.
Tmac can score big but more of an unkown.
Laird the most popular probably but also the best, can still improve and wouldnt be suprised to see him go 105 average.
Nankervis and Laird vs Macrae and Vlastuin
Quote from: cptawesom3 on February 24, 2017, 11:53:02 PM
Nankervis and Laird vs Macrae and Vlastuin
nank and laird. more potential upside to nank and laird should outscore macrea
Ryder + Roughead vs Heeney + Nankervis
Have had Ryder and Rough in all year long, but am seriously thinking the latter might generate more points
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 25, 2017, 05:39:05 AM
Ryder + Roughead vs Heeney + Nankervis
Have had Ryder and Rough in all year long, but am seriously thinking the latter might generate more points
Heeney and Nank for mine
hey guys, Im going with 6 high end mids...
$1,195,200 to spend on my last 2 spots (already got Danger/treloar/rocky/fyfe)
was thinking Hanners/Titch... or Jelwood/bonts, maybe Pendles and Heppell/jobe
do you guys have a better suggestion??
ps: I downgraded Macrae to Caddy as i think they'll avg around the same and that got me enough coin to bring in Pendles and Titch. i was dreading starting the season without pendles
Currently have a rookie at F6 but really struggling with no one standing out.
A) Hanners, Lids, Rookie
B) Shiel, Heeney, Roughy
B option I'm only 2K off Sloane so I can replace Shiel with any mid up to 590K
Titch vs Bont vs Sloane vs Steven vs Priddis?
I know all are solid picks but torn on who to start.
Quote from: freddo81 on February 25, 2017, 09:59:47 AM
Titch vs Bont vs Sloane vs Steven vs Priddis?
I know all are solid picks but torn on who to start.
Bont imo
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 25, 2017, 08:23:09 AM
hey guys, Im going with 6 high end mids...
$1,195,200 to spend on my last 2 spots (already got Danger/treloar/rocky/fyfe)
was thinking Hanners/Titch... or Jelwood/bonts, maybe Pendles and Heppell/jobe
do you guys have a better suggestion??
ps: I downgraded Macrae to Caddy as i think they'll avg around the same and that got me enough coin to bring in Pendles and Titch. i was dreading starting the season without pendles
If you can afford Pendles and Titch, then I'd go with that.
Quote from: billnats on February 25, 2017, 09:35:07 AM
Currently have a rookie at F6 but really struggling with no one standing out.
A) Hanners, Lids, Rookie
B) Shiel, Heeney, Roughy
B option I'm only 2K off Sloane so I can replace Shiel with any mid up to 590K
Option A, gives you 2 top end premos and a rookie to make some cash, as opposed to 3 guys who might be keepers but might not and you'll end up having to waste trades on all of them. Keep an eye on Lids' pre-season though, no guarantee that he'll be ready for round 1.
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 25, 2017, 01:56:19 PM
Quote from: freddo81 on February 25, 2017, 09:59:47 AM
Titch vs Bont vs Sloane vs Steven vs Priddis?
I know all are solid picks but torn on who to start.
Bont imo
If Sloaney is looking good for round 1 then I'd go with him. If not, then probably Bont.
Quote from: js19 on February 25, 2017, 06:23:15 AM
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 25, 2017, 05:39:05 AM
Ryder + Roughead vs Heeney + Nankervis
Have had Ryder and Rough in all year long, but am seriously thinking the latter might generate more points
Heeney and Nank for mine
See how Nank goes in the next 2 JLT games, think Sauce was only rucking for half the game for the Crows.
Quote from: crowls on February 25, 2017, 12:04:03 AM
Quote from: cptawesom3 on February 24, 2017, 11:53:02 PM
Nankervis and Laird vs Macrae and Vlastuin
nank and laird. more potential upside to nank and laird should outscore macrea
Yeah agreed, simply because I really don't like the Vlastuin pick :P
Quote from: dmac07 on February 24, 2017, 06:53:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 24, 2017, 06:10:02 PM
Rance vs Tmac vs Laird?
Currently have both Rance and Tmac. Tmac's end to last season was amazing and feel he is fairly underpriced and see him as a top 10 defender. Rance has been ultra consistent for a while now, but had a slightly interrupted pre-season. Managed to get a bit extra cash today after getting some dirt over the fellas at SC HQ, so can now either turn Tmac into Laird, or just straight swap Rance for Laird. Leaning towards the Tmac + Laird combo now.
Laird > Tmac > Rance
Rance the most reliable, lokely to play every game and average 95, but this year there seems to be multiple options capable of going 100+ in defense when previously 95 was good enough.
Tmac can score big but more of an unkown.
Laird the most popular probably but also the best, can still improve and wouldnt be suprised to see him go 105 average.
Cheers mate, pretty much my thoughts as well :)
Bontempelli & A.Black
V
D.Beams & J.Elliot
Do I go the sure premium and dodgy rookie priced player, or Beams and Elliot to sure up the on field forwards, Hoskin-Elliot, Bowes, Black/Butler currently occupy my F4-7 which feels a little risky.
Quote from: dmac07 on February 25, 2017, 03:40:23 PM
Bontempelli & A.Black
V
D.Beams & J.Elliot
Do I go the sure premium and dodgy rookie priced player, or Beams and Elliot to sure up the on field forwards, Hoskin-Elliot, Bowes, Black/Butler currently occupy my F4-7 which feels a little risky.
See how Beams, Elliott, and Black go throughout the JLT. Personally, I'd be leaning towards Bont and Black, as I don't see Elliott making enough cash to justify the pick. Need Black to cement his spot for round 1 though, and I don't know too much about his JS unfortunately.
Quote from: GoLions on February 25, 2017, 03:47:13 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on February 25, 2017, 03:40:23 PM
Bontempelli & A.Black
V
D.Beams & J.Elliot
Do I go the sure premium and dodgy rookie priced player, or Beams and Elliot to sure up the on field forwards, Hoskin-Elliot, Bowes, Black/Butler currently occupy my F4-7 which feels a little risky.
See how Beams, Elliott, and Black go throughout the JLT. Personally, I'd be leaning towards Bont and Black, as I don't see Elliott making enough cash to justify the pick. Need Black to cement his spot for round 1 though, and I don't know too much about his JS unfortunately.
I'd go for Bont + Black as well
Stuck on this one:
Roughy and O'Meara
Or
Macrae and Rookie (e.g. Ainsworth)
Quote from: billnats on February 27, 2017, 12:24:08 AM
Stuck on this one:
Roughy and O'Meara
Or
Macrae and Rookie (e.g. Ainsworth)
Same deal for me only slightly different players. I'd go Roughie & O'Meara (I just switched Bont & McCluggage to O'Meara & Roughie).
O'Meara into midfield lets me swing across Ainsworth or another higher priced rookie.
Roughy did look good today!
Roughy & O'Meara vs. Hanners and Rookie FWD
Hanners is a top 15 mid and he'll be one of my 6 elite mids.
roughy can go 85-90, o'meara can go 95-100
Assuming both can hit 95+:
Higgins with his horrible injury record
or
Wingard with his horrible bye-but-not-a-bye (even worse if I take Ryder for Ruck cover)
Option 1 greater scoring potential
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 27, 2017, 10:31:03 AM
Roughy & O'Meara vs. Hanners and Rookie FWD
Hanners is a top 15 mid and he'll be one of my 6 elite mids.
roughy can go 85-90, o'meara can go 95-100
Quote from: Vulpes on February 27, 2017, 04:29:37 PM
Assuming both can hit 95+:
Higgins with his horrible injury record
or
Wingard with his horrible bye-but-not-a-bye (even worse if I take Ryder for Ruck cover)
I'm reaaaaaaaally tempted to start Higgins atm, if he gets enough midfield minutes should go 95ish imo, not many other players at North who will be taking away points (Goldy, then...? Jmac, Ziebell, Cunners I guess but not 100+ scorers). So yeah, Higgins over Wingard imo
Quote from: whynot102 on February 27, 2017, 05:25:08 PM
Option 1 greater scoring potential Quote from: Keeper27 on February 27, 2017, 10:31:03 AM
Roughy & O'Meara vs. Hanners and Rookie FWD
Hanners is a top 15 mid and he'll be one of my 6 elite mids.
roughy can go 85-90, o'meara can go 95-100
Yeah I dunno. Usually I'd lock in Hanners and the rookie, but both Roughy and JOM have impressed so far. Will wait until the JLT is finished before making a final decision on those 2. If you have Swallow and have the cash to turn him into JOM, maybe do that and stick with Hanners and FWD rookie?
I've got Higgins and Heeney. Low 400's means I can use money elsewhere. Both can go 100+ if they stay fit. Higgins rarely misses a target
Macrae v GUNston
Similar prices both with Rd 12 bye
Priddis v Selwood.
Quote from: Ringo on February 28, 2017, 10:10:22 AM
Similar prices both with Rd 12 bye
Priddis v Selwood.
Selwood imo
Bont + rookie v Murphy/Beams if fit + O'Meara
Bont vs Titchell vs JPK vs Jelwood
heeney vs gunston
Quote from: EazyMoney on February 28, 2017, 11:22:35 AM
Bont + rookie v Murphy/Beams if fit + O'Meara
Depends on the rookie. Murphy and JOM tempting though if JOM puts in another good showing in his last JLT game.
Quote from: jvalles69 on February 28, 2017, 03:42:53 PM
Bont vs Titchell vs JPK vs Jelwood
JPK or Jelly I reckon
Quote from: jvalles69 on February 28, 2017, 03:42:53 PM
Bont vs Titchell vs JPK vs Jelwood
I have 3 of the 4 8)
JPK > Jelwood > Bont > Titch
MaCrae vs Greene ??
Shaw and Heeney vs Adams and Caddy
Quote from: tommy10 on February 28, 2017, 09:33:49 PM
Shaw and Heeney vs Adams and Caddy
this is probably the toughest one ive seen tbh
id go adams and caddy, but maybe im just saying that because thats what i have
Shaws certainly the safer defender but the heeney vs caddy debate id imagine would be 50/50 between the community but id favour caddy
Quote from: tommy10 on February 28, 2017, 09:33:49 PM
Shaw and Heeney vs Adams and Caddy
Tough! Only way to do it (for mine) is to weigh up what I predict them to score:
Shaw 100-105 + Heeney 90? VS Adams 100 + Caddy 95
190-195 apiece for mine, though the durability of Shaw and Heeney I think tips that pair over the edge!
Rockliff + 123k fwd rookie (currently McKay - on field) vs Higgins/Henney + JOM.
Have no midpricers otherwise.
Thanks!
Quote from: Spite on March 02, 2017, 05:53:09 PM
Rockliff + 123k fwd rookie (currently McKay - on field) vs Higgins/Henney + JOM.
Have no midpricers otherwise.
Thanks!
Always something including Rocky :P
Quote from: TomK on March 02, 2017, 06:13:46 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 02, 2017, 05:53:09 PM
Rockliff + 123k fwd rookie (currently McKay - on field) vs Higgins/Henney + JOM.
Have no midpricers otherwise.
Thanks!
Always something including Rocky :P
Haha then what about this?
JPK, Grundy, McKay, D.Cameron to JOM, Sandi, Caddy, McCluggage.
I would have gone the first option if I knew those forward rookies were playing but unfortunately it looks unlikely! :(
Quote from: Spite on March 02, 2017, 07:19:01 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 02, 2017, 06:13:46 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 02, 2017, 05:53:09 PM
Rockliff + 123k fwd rookie (currently McKay - on field) vs Higgins/Henney + JOM.
Have no midpricers otherwise.
Thanks!
Always something including Rocky :P
Haha then what about this?
JPK, Grundy, McKay, D.Cameron to JOM, Sandi, Caddy, McCluggage.
I would have gone the first option if I knew those forward rookies were playing but unfortunately it looks unlikely! :(
The first option is much safer if the rookies were to play but the second has much more scoring potential. I'd probably go option two.
Quote from: TomK on March 02, 2017, 07:57:31 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 02, 2017, 07:19:01 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 02, 2017, 06:13:46 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 02, 2017, 05:53:09 PM
Rockliff + 123k fwd rookie (currently McKay - on field) vs Higgins/Henney + JOM.
Have no midpricers otherwise.
Thanks!
Always something including Rocky :P
Haha then what about this?
JPK, Grundy, McKay, D.Cameron to JOM, Sandi, Caddy, McCluggage.
I would have gone the first option if I knew those forward rookies were playing but unfortunately it looks unlikely! :(
The first option is much safer if the rookies were to play but the second has much more scoring potential. I'd probably go option two.
Thanks man, second option it is!
Higgins v Petracca v Ryder v Roughy
All midpricers all with huge upside this year. Can only fit one though...
Quote from: Sven on March 03, 2017, 12:12:02 PM
Higgins v Petracca v Ryder v Roughy
All midpricers all with huge upside this year. Can only fit one though...
Higgins > Roughy > Ryder > Petracca
Quote from: Sven on March 03, 2017, 12:12:02 PM
Higgins v Petracca v Ryder v Roughy
All midpricers all with huge upside this year. Can only fit one though...
Petracca, Higgins ( only for 4 - 6 rds, then upgrade ), Roughead, Ryder. IMO Nankervis much more value and potential than Ryder.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 03, 2017, 12:52:41 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 03, 2017, 12:12:02 PM
Higgins v Petracca v Ryder v Roughy
All midpricers all with huge upside this year. Can only fit one though...
Petracca, Higgins ( only for 4 - 6 rds, then upgrade ), Roughead, Ryder. IMO Nankervis much more value and potential than Ryder.
Go to disagree Sabretootch. Petracca is only a second year player. will lack the consistency required. Agree Higgins could pay off if you get him at the start of a streak of form. roughy to me is still a bit of a punt but worth it at his starting price.
gone off Ryder as my backup for Sandi. Instead gone to Darcy as f8 and ruck cover. May still upgrade him for Nank before Round 1 or see if Pruess is going to get games.
:)
Z Merritt v L Neale, v D Zorko v D Martin v R Sloane for M.5 with Fyfe, O'Meara and W Brodie then Barrett, Wigg and Picket to follow.
:-\
Quote from: crowls on March 03, 2017, 12:57:25 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 03, 2017, 12:52:41 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 03, 2017, 12:12:02 PM
Higgins v Petracca v Ryder v Roughy
All midpricers all with huge upside this year. Can only fit one though...
Petracca, Higgins ( only for 4 - 6 rds, then upgrade ), Roughead, Ryder. IMO Nankervis much more value and potential than Ryder.
Go to disagree Sabretootch. Petracca is only a second year player. will lack the consistency required. Agree Higgins could pay off if you get him at the start of a streak of form. roughy to me is still a bit of a punt but worth it at his starting price.
gone off Ryder as my backup for Sandi. Instead gone to Darcy as f8 and ruck cover. May still upgrade him for Nank before Round 1 or see if Pruess is going to get games.
You may be right crowls, I haven't got him in my team but think he may be something very special, even as a second year player. But not confident enough to pick him.
Why not Titch ST... Also would prioritise whichever player balances your byes better.
Quote from: crowls on March 03, 2017, 01:04:00 PM
Why not Titch ST... Also would prioritise whichever player balances your byes better.
Nice suggestion crowls. It would come down to either Titch or Zerritt bye wise. Like Titch's price, thanks mate, cheers and all the best.
:)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 03, 2017, 01:00:28 PM
:)
Z Merritt v L Neale, v D Zorko v D Martin v R Sloane for M.5 with Fyfe, O'Meara and W Brodie then Barrett, Wigg and Picket to follow.
:-\
I like Sloaney if he's good to go round 1
Quote from: GoLions on March 03, 2017, 02:11:01 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 03, 2017, 01:00:28 PM
:)
Z Merritt v L Neale, v D Zorko v D Martin v R Sloane for M.5 with Fyfe, O'Meara and W Brodie then Barrett, Wigg and Picket to follow.
:-\
I like Sloaney if he's good to go round 1
+1 for sloaney, i do like Neale better but he has had a super interrupted preseaon
Pendles + strnadica (loophole) v Treloar + English (if named round 1)
Pendles and Strnadica
With Sandi at R2 which combo to give back up. (Still undecided whether to have back up)
Gawn+Nankervis or Goldy+ Ryder (About 10k short of Gawn and Ryder)
Quote from: uncleswagy on March 03, 2017, 07:03:26 PM
Pendles + strnadica (loophole) v Treloar + English (if named round 1)
First option. Loopholes are seriously underrated in the value they provide!
Beams + Goldstein vs Any Midfielder(600k) + Sandilands + $112,600
The 600k is based on what the added cash would equal to.
O'Meara & Hrovat
or
J. Kelly & Rookie
Don't like mid-pricers but the forward line is struggling with rookie forward nailed on
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2017, 07:12:54 PM
With Sandi at R2 which combo to give back up. (Still undecided whether to have back up)
Gawn+Nankervis or Goldy+ Ryder (About 10k short of Gawn and Ryder)
Gawn & Nankervis
Quote from: billnats on March 03, 2017, 09:17:33 PM
O'Meara & Hrovat
or
J. Kelly & Rookie
Don't like mid-pricers but the forward line is struggling with rookie forward nailed on
Not sure if I can promote either of these options, but if you must O'Meara and Hrovat. If another forward rook appears though I'd go O'Meara + rookie.
Quote from: billnats on March 03, 2017, 09:21:46 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2017, 07:12:54 PM
With Sandi at R2 which combo to give back up. (Still undecided whether to have back up)
Gawn+Nankervis or Goldy+ Ryder (About 10k short of Gawn and Ryder)
Gawn & Nankervis
Gawn and Nank.
Roughy (F4) vs. Beams (M6)
dunno if both can be keepers but i just need 1 to make enough money for an U/G
Clugg vs taranto?
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 03, 2017, 09:04:57 PM
Beams + Goldstein vs Any Midfielder(600k) + Sandilands + $112,600
The 600k is based on what the added cash would equal to.
Beams and Goldy
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 03, 2017, 09:57:46 PM
Roughy (F4) vs. Beams (M6)
dunno if both can be keepers but i just need 1 to make enough money for an U/G
Tough one. Beams will obviously destroy Roughy in scoring, but a muchhhhh larger injury risk. Probably Beams as the reward would be huge if he stays fit for even half the season.
Quote from: Bluesman on March 04, 2017, 12:13:46 AM
Clugg vs taranto?
If Taranto starts round 1...look out. He's a gun. I'd probably start both haha. If i had to choose...then I'd wait until the end of the JLT :P
Quote from: GoLions on March 04, 2017, 12:49:09 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 03, 2017, 09:57:46 PM
Roughy (F4) vs. Beams (M6)
dunno if both can be keepers but i just need 1 to make enough money for an U/G
Tough one. Beams will obviously destroy Roughy in scoring, but a muchhhhh larger injury risk. Probably Beams as the reward would be huge if he stays fit for even half the season.
yeah thought so too..
Quote from: GoLions on March 04, 2017, 12:50:22 AM
Quote from: Bluesman on March 04, 2017, 12:13:46 AM
Clugg vs taranto?
If Taranto starts round 1...look out. He's a gun. I'd probably start both haha. If i had to choose...then I'd wait until the end of the JLT :P
agreed, Taranto if chosen, but i doubt it... too many guns in GWS team
zorko vs. treloar??
have pendles and beams in my midfield.
Beams & Roughy
vs
Swallow & McRae
???
I think its a line ball points wise but reckon more potential for games missed with Beams & Rough.
hang on.......what about Beams & Petracca as another combo v that lot?
Titchell & Beams
or
O'Meara & Rocky
Quote from: billnats on March 04, 2017, 11:52:23 AM
Titchell & Beams
or
O'Meara & Rocky
I have one
Bob Murphy, Swallow, Schoenmakers v Roberton/Hartlett, Taranto, J Thomas
Quote from: billnats on March 04, 2017, 11:52:23 AM
Titchell & Beams
or
O'Meara & Rocky
Quote from: _wato on March 04, 2017, 01:17:20 PM
I have one
Bob Murphy, Swallow, Schoenmakers v Roberton/Hartlett, Taranto, J Thomas
Quote from: _wato on March 04, 2017, 01:17:20 PM
I have one
Bob Murphy, Swallow, Schoenmakers v Roberton/Hartlett, Taranto, J Thomas
Mills, Swallow and a rookie. Make it happen ;)
Quote from: billnats on March 04, 2017, 11:52:23 AM
Titchell & Beams
or
O'Meara & Rocky
I like the tmitch/beams combo atm
Quote from: billnats on March 04, 2017, 11:52:23 AM
Titchell & Beams
or
O'Meara & Rocky
(http://www.relatably.com/m/img/why-not-both-meme-origin/3449086.jpg)
i have all 4
Because I went Kelly and Swallow instead :-[
Wish I can afford them all! Even Treloar and Adams are teasing me
Today is why I had him in my first team. Took him out after the intraclub and JLT 1. Howe is a machine off half back.
So..
J.Howe vs B.Vince both $500K
Hard to split.
But edging Vince as he'll get some mid minutes were Jez won't.
Quote from: petefisker on March 04, 2017, 10:09:02 PM
Today is why I had him in my first team. Took him out after the intraclub and JLT 1. Howe is a machine off half back.
So..
J.Howe vs B.Vince both $500K
Hard to split.
But edging Vince as he'll get some mid minutes were Jez won't.
Careful with Vince, he's being used more & more as their primary tagger. His last 5 scores in 2016 were 50, 98, 104, 54 & 46.
:)
Totally forgetting prices and just on a points, likely-hood of becoming a keeper and a view to cash generation if being a keeper is unlikely. Who to take out of
C Mills V J Roughead
Either at D.4 or F.3 just ahead of T Nankervis
;)
Unless your convinced Roughy cannot get back to his previous form you have to take him, Proven history and upside on price versus an unknown potential.
Pendlebery and cripps v treloar and JPK
Quote from: uncleswagy on March 05, 2017, 02:35:43 PM
Pendlebery and cripps v treloar and JPK
Treloar and Jpk
C.mills v J.Lloyd
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 05, 2017, 05:33:09 PM
Quote from: uncleswagy on March 05, 2017, 02:35:43 PM
Pendlebery and cripps v treloar and JPK
Treloar and Jpk
C.mills v J.Lloyd
Treloar and JPK as well. Cripps might get off to a slow start.
Mills.
Higgins vs Caddy.
Quote from: Grufflez on March 05, 2017, 06:57:03 PM
Higgins vs Caddy.
Think Higgins will score more but has been more injury prone
Still having issues with my forward line. Currently have Roughy at F4 but think he needs to drop to F5. So...
Laird, Taranto, Hoskin-Elliot
Or
Tuohey, Caddy and Durdin (bench)
Nank (F5 and Ruck cover) vs. Swallow (M8)
$56K short of having both >:(
Quote from: billnats on March 05, 2017, 08:03:59 PM
Still having issues with my forward line. Currently have Roughy at F4 but think he needs to drop to F5. So...
Laird, Taranto, Hoskin-Elliot
Or
Tuohey, Caddy and Durdin (bench)
Forget Tuohey and Taranto, might be a special player in time but GWS is stacked like a Baywatch commercial.
200k rookies are priced 15+ points over 117k ones and appreciate slower if you have to take one take one from a shower team as there is better job security plus point scoring potential.
I'm stealing someone else's idea and going with Laird and Nanks at F5. He also provides ruck cover.
Means I still have 200K for my F6.
Shaw & Schoenmakers versus Marchbank & Franklin
Quote from: Bully on March 06, 2017, 12:09:10 AM
Shaw & Schoenmakers versus Marchbank & Franklin
105 + 60 v 75 + 95
Option 2.
Quote from: Bully on March 06, 2017, 12:19:29 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 06, 2017, 12:14:36 AM
Quote from: Bully on March 06, 2017, 12:09:10 AM
Shaw & Schoenmakers versus Marchbank & Franklin
105 + 60 v 75 + 95
Option 2.
Cheers.
No worries man. Option 1 will reward you more but option 2 will be much more consistent. I really like Marchbank, have him myself.
Shaw and Prestia vs Vince and Bont
Quote from: tommy10 on March 06, 2017, 12:38:18 AM
Shaw and Prestia vs Vince and Bont
Tough one. I'd rather Howe and Sloane, I reckon you might afford that.
Hannebery v Treloar
Quote from: _wato on March 06, 2017, 01:25:23 AM
Hannebery v Treloar
I reckon Treloar can improve his average, i would expect Hanners to stay the same or drop a bit
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 03:04:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 06, 2017, 01:25:23 AM
Hannebery v Treloar
I reckon Treloar can improve his average, i would expect Hanners to stay the same or drop a bit
Sound logic here.
Tuohy vs mills d4
Quote from: Grufflez on March 06, 2017, 10:02:28 AM
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 03:04:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 06, 2017, 01:25:23 AM
Hannebery v Treloar
I reckon Treloar can improve his average, i would expect Hanners to stay the same or drop a bit
Sound logic here.
Treloar is younger and the Pies midfield will be the key in Pies success , there may be some uncertainty in the swans midfield with Mitchell leaving meaning other players will get rotated ,so scoring may be muddled for a couple of weeks. And if you were to pick a swans midfielder i would go with Mr consistency JPK
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 02:01:36 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on March 06, 2017, 10:02:28 AM
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 03:04:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 06, 2017, 01:25:23 AM
Hannebery v Treloar
I reckon Treloar can improve his average, i would expect Hanners to stay the same or drop a bit
Sound logic here.
Treloar is younger and the Pies midfield will be the key in Pies success , there may be some uncertainty in the swans midfield with Mitchell leaving meaning other players will get rotated ,so scoring may be muddled for a couple of weeks. And if you were to pick a swans midfielder i would go with Mr consistency JPK
Interestingly in 2016, Mr. Consistency's standard deviation was 21.9 whereas Hannebery's was 21.5, the more consistent player. I am not doubting JPK's status as a Mr. Consistency, but I wouldn't use consistency as a means for justifying a JPK selection over a Hannebery selection. I think they are both absolute guns that will fall in the 112-117 range, and I am starting both.
Quote from: BomberSam on March 06, 2017, 02:12:59 PM
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 02:01:36 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on March 06, 2017, 10:02:28 AM
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 03:04:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 06, 2017, 01:25:23 AM
Hannebery v Treloar
I reckon Treloar can improve his average, i would expect Hanners to stay the same or drop a bit
Sound logic here.
Treloar is younger and the Pies midfield will be the key in Pies success , there may be some uncertainty in the swans midfield with Mitchell leaving meaning other players will get rotated ,so scoring may be muddled for a couple of weeks. And if you were to pick a swans midfielder i would go with Mr consistency JPK
Interestingly in 2016, Mr. Consistency's standard deviation was 21.9 whereas Hannebery's was 21.5, the more consistent player. I am not doubting JPK's status as a Mr. Consistency, but I wouldn't use consistency as a means for justifying a JPK selection over a Hannebery selection. I think they are both absolute guns that will fall in the 112-117 range, and I am starting both.
Ahh fair point
Fair play picking both, i just prefer JPK :)
Marchbank + Roughead v Shaw + Rookie
Goldstein + Rookie v Sandilands + Macrae
JPK & Bowes vs TMitch & Taranto (assuming both rookies play)
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 06, 2017, 04:27:27 PM
Marchbank + Roughead v Shaw + Rookie
Goldstein + Rookie v Sandilands + Macrae
2nd option for both
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 06, 2017, 12:49:35 PM
Tuohy vs mills d4
Mills, but tbh would rather find the cash for a top end premo
Quote from: bartsy on March 06, 2017, 09:42:57 PM
JPK & Bowes vs TMitch & Taranto (assuming both rookies play)
JPK and Bowes
Treloar + fwd rook v brodie + caddy
Edit: if picking treloar, heeney will be f2
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 02:20:30 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 06, 2017, 02:12:59 PM
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 02:01:36 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on March 06, 2017, 10:02:28 AM
Quote from: Hawka on March 06, 2017, 03:04:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 06, 2017, 01:25:23 AM
Hannebery v Treloar
I reckon Treloar can improve his average, i would expect Hanners to stay the same or drop a bit
Sound logic here.
Treloar is younger and the Pies midfield will be the key in Pies success , there may be some uncertainty in the swans midfield with Mitchell leaving meaning other players will get rotated ,so scoring may be muddled for a couple of weeks. And if you were to pick a swans midfielder i would go with Mr consistency JPK
Interestingly in 2016, Mr. Consistency's standard deviation was 21.9 whereas Hannebery's was 21.5, the more consistent player. I am not doubting JPK's status as a Mr. Consistency, but I wouldn't use consistency as a means for justifying a JPK selection over a Hannebery selection. I think they are both absolute guns that will fall in the 112-117 range, and I am starting both.
Ahh fair point
Fair play picking both, i just prefer JPK :)
Contested beast.
Quote from: uncleswagy on March 07, 2017, 12:17:12 AM
Treloar + fwd rook v brodie + caddy
Edit: if picking treloar, heeney will be f2
Brodie and Caddy simply because there arent any good fwd rookies at this poijt and i imagine heeney at f2 leaves that line very weak
Quote from: _wato on March 06, 2017, 01:16:43 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 06, 2017, 12:38:18 AM
Shaw and Prestia vs Vince and Bont
Tough one. I'd rather Howe and Sloane, I reckon you might afford that.
Like Howe too Wato, but have Shaw and Adams at D1 & D2, so don't want another pie. Unless I swap Howe for Adams?? So leads me to my question Howe vs Adams?
Shaw, Beams, Caddy vs Laird, Bont, Nank.
D2/M6/F4
Slightly leaning to Shaw, Beams, Caddy but not a lot of difference between the 2.
Roughead v Caddy
Quote from: lmollica on March 07, 2017, 02:41:50 PM
Roughead v Caddy
Conservatively, I'd say Caddy. Roughy will likely average 90, think Caddy will be around 95 mark.
Big one here...
Def Rookie (not Ryan, Stewart or EV-W) + Hanners + Treloar + Nank + Bowes
OR
Marchbank + Pendles + Mid Rookie + Gawn + WH-E.
Quote from: Sven on March 08, 2017, 06:59:08 AM
Big one here...
Def Rookie (not Ryan, Stewart or EV-W) + Hanners + Treloar + Nank + Bowes
OR
Marchbank + Pendles + Mid Rookie + Gawn + WH-E.
Top option for me
Quote from: Spite on March 08, 2017, 02:03:35 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 08, 2017, 06:59:08 AM
Big one here...
Def Rookie (not Ryan, Stewart or EV-W) + Hanners + Treloar + Nank + Bowes
OR
Marchbank + Pendles + Mid Rookie + Gawn + WH-E.
Top option for me
+1 easily
Quote from: tommy10 on March 08, 2017, 02:37:42 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 08, 2017, 02:03:35 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 08, 2017, 06:59:08 AM
Big one here...
Def Rookie (not Ryan, Stewart or EV-W) + Hanners + Treloar + Nank + Bowes
OR
Marchbank + Pendles + Mid Rookie + Gawn + WH-E.
Top option for me
+1 easily
Yeah, thought that was going to be the case. Just toying with ideas to go from Nankilands to Gawndilands.
Cheers.
Quote from: Sven on March 08, 2017, 05:30:24 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 08, 2017, 02:37:42 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 08, 2017, 02:03:35 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 08, 2017, 06:59:08 AM
Big one here...
Def Rookie (not Ryan, Stewart or EV-W) + Hanners + Treloar + Nank + Bowes
OR
Marchbank + Pendles + Mid Rookie + Gawn + WH-E.
Top option for me
+1 easily
Yeah, thought that was going to be the case. Just toying with ideas to go from Nankilands to Gawndilands.
Cheers.
In its self i agree the top one is easily better but the nankilands combo is a huge risk
Bont v Selwood :-[
Quote from: john23132 on March 08, 2017, 11:34:09 PM
Bont v Selwood :-[
Very tough, leaning towards Selwood.
@M3 - Treloar vs Hannebery vs Jelwood
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 09, 2017, 01:01:54 AM
@M3 - Treloar vs Hannebery vs Jelwood
Same problem as me. Laaaawl
Currently have
Hanners > Treloar > Jelly
:)
Which 1 of the 3 to leave out :- Thurlow, Marchbank McCartin :-\
The result won't interfere with team balance.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 09, 2017, 04:01:08 AM
:)
Which 1 of the 3 to leave out :- Thurlow, Marchbank McCartin :-\
The result won't interfere with team balance.
McCartin. Marchabnk a lock.
here is a tough one
Buddy Treloar Gunston Turner/McCarthy/Bowes
or
Buddy Macrae Higgins Nankervis
or
Caddy Rance Higgins Nankervis
Quote from: Holz on March 09, 2017, 10:49:51 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 09, 2017, 04:01:08 AM
:)
Which 1 of the 3 to leave out :- Thurlow, Marchbank McCartin :-\
The result won't interfere with team balance.
McCartin. Marchabnk a lock.
here is a tough one
Buddy Treloar Gunston Turner/McCarthy/Bowes
or
Buddy Macrae Higgins Nankervis
or
Caddy Rance Higgins Nankervis
Buddy, Treloar, GUNston, Bowes for me
If you have Sandi in the ruck, then maybe the 2nd option.
JPK + Hibberd (on field) v Hurley + Sheed
Quote from: _wato on March 09, 2017, 11:54:15 AM
JPK + Hibberd (on field) v Hurley + Sheed
JPK Donut beats Hurley sheed
easy choice
Quote from: Holz on March 09, 2017, 11:55:40 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 09, 2017, 11:54:15 AM
JPK + Hibberd (on field) v Hurley + Sheed
JPK Donut beats Hurley sheed
easy choice
Hahaha donut love it. Need one more defender rookie to look good and it'll be sorted
forget postions who will score more
Macrae or Rance.
Quote from: Holz on March 09, 2017, 02:34:47 PM
forget postions who will score more
Macrae or Rance.
Rance by 3ppg
Quote from: GoLions on March 09, 2017, 03:52:51 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 09, 2017, 03:47:09 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 09, 2017, 03:38:34 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on March 09, 2017, 02:37:53 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 09, 2017, 02:34:47 PM
forget postions who will score more
Macrae or Rance.
Rance by 3ppg
How about Shaw v Macrae?
Shaw.
Shaw > Macrae > Rance imo
Agreed.
Quote from: Sven on March 09, 2017, 06:43:16 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 09, 2017, 03:52:51 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 09, 2017, 03:47:09 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 09, 2017, 03:38:34 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on March 09, 2017, 02:37:53 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 09, 2017, 02:34:47 PM
forget postions who will score more
Macrae or Rance.
Rance by 3ppg
How about Shaw v Macrae?
Shaw.
Shaw > Macrae > Rance imo
Agreed.
Shaw 105
Macrae 98
Rance 95
Quote from: dmac07 on March 09, 2017, 08:47:19 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 09, 2017, 06:43:16 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 09, 2017, 03:52:51 PM
Quote from: Sven on March 09, 2017, 03:47:09 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 09, 2017, 03:38:34 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on March 09, 2017, 02:37:53 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 09, 2017, 02:34:47 PM
forget postions who will score more
Macrae or Rance.
Rance by 3ppg
How about Shaw v Macrae?
Shaw.
Shaw > Macrae > Rance imo
Agreed.
Shaw 105
Macrae 98
Rance 95
Where does Caddy fit into this?
KK vs Bob Murphy?
Quote from: TexR74 on March 10, 2017, 01:31:59 PM
KK vs Bob Murphy?
Murphy, with Day out KK will play more lockdown and this will reflect in his scoring.
Quote from: TexR74 on March 10, 2017, 01:31:59 PM
KK vs Bob Murphy?
Why are people still considering KK after averaging 69 last season? Id stay clear from both of these options, either chip in a few $ and get a Tuohy/Mills or go lower for a Marchbank. Thats what i'd do anyway
Quote from: john23132 on March 10, 2017, 04:16:29 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on March 10, 2017, 01:31:59 PM
KK vs Bob Murphy?
Why are people still considering KK after averaging 69 last season? Id stay clear from both of these options, either chip in a few $ and get a Tuohy/Mills or go lower for a Marchbank. Thats what i'd do anyway
Good advice.
choose 3 who you think will score more.
Beams/Oliver/JOM/Swallow
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 11, 2017, 10:44:08 AM
choose 3 who you think will score more.
Beams/Oliver/JOM/Swallow
Beams, JOM, Swallow in that order
Laird vs Vince vs Howe?
Quote from: GoLions on March 11, 2017, 11:12:03 AM
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 11, 2017, 11:01:53 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 11, 2017, 10:44:08 AM
choose 3 who you think will score more.
Beams/Oliver/JOM/Swallow
Beams, JOM, Swallow in that order
This^
Quote from: GoLions on March 11, 2017, 11:12:43 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 11, 2017, 11:06:40 AM
Quote from: TexR74 on March 11, 2017, 11:04:54 AM
Laird vs Vince vs Howe?
Laird
And this^
These ^
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 11, 2017, 11:01:53 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 11, 2017, 10:44:08 AM
choose 3 who you think will score more.
Beams/Oliver/JOM/Swallow
Beams, JOM, Swallow in that order
Beams, JOM, Swallow, Oliver. Doesnt matter how good Oliver is, his age, maturity and lack of preseasons will see him lag behind the others. If he turns out to beat that then you are looking at the a new SC beast. Next year is possible but more likely the year after I would expect 105-110 average from this kid.
Have 530K for a forward
Options are Macrea, Nank, Higgins, Greene, T Lynch
Already have Dahl, Caddy and Roughy.
Other option is downgrade to a prem rookie and upgrade Marchbank to a 480K def.
Suggestions appreciated
Quote from: crowls on March 11, 2017, 12:54:37 PM
Have 530K for a forward
Options are Macrea, Nank, Higgins, Greene, T Lynch
Already have Dahl, Caddy and Roughy.
Other option is downgrade to a prem rookie and upgrade Marchbank to a 480K def.
Suggestions appreciated
I was tinkering with some changes this morning...namely, Nankervis coming in, Higgins going out, gave me more funds to play with. Then looked at dumping Gawn and switching Nank to R2 which meant I had more funds to play with and could bring in Macrae.
What I have presently settled on is Nank in fwds as the extra funds have allowed me to upgrade elsewhere.
I like the first 3 choices over the latter 2 but I suppose it comes down to what you can do with the change as they are all different prices.
My X v Y would be...
Nank/ Howe v Higgins/Mills
Quote from: enzedder on March 11, 2017, 01:49:39 PM
Quote from: crowls on March 11, 2017, 12:54:37 PM
Have 530K for a forward
Options are Macrea, Nank, Higgins, Greene, T Lynch
Already have Dahl, Caddy and Roughy.
Other option is downgrade to a prem rookie and upgrade Marchbank to a 480K def.
Suggestions appreciated
I was tinkering with some changes this morning...namely, Nankervis coming in, Higgins going out, gave me more funds to play with. Then looked at dumping Gawn and switching Nank to R2 which meant I had more funds to play with and could bring in Macrae.
What I have presently settled on is Nank in fwds as the extra funds have allowed me to upgrade elsewhere.
I like the first 3 choices over the latter 2 but I suppose it comes down to what you can do with the change as they are all different prices.
My X v Y would be...
Nank/ Howe v Higgins/Mills
Nank/Howe imo
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 11, 2017, 01:53:28 PM
Quote from: enzedder on March 11, 2017, 01:49:39 PM
Quote from: crowls on March 11, 2017, 12:54:37 PM
Have 530K for a forward
Options are Macrea, Nank, Higgins, Greene, T Lynch
Already have Dahl, Caddy and Roughy.
Other option is downgrade to a prem rookie and upgrade Marchbank to a 480K def.
Suggestions appreciated
I was tinkering with some changes this morning...namely, Nankervis coming in, Higgins going out, gave me more funds to play with. Then looked at dumping Gawn and switching Nank to R2 which meant I had more funds to play with and could bring in Macrae.
What I have presently settled on is Nank in fwds as the extra funds have allowed me to upgrade elsewhere.
I like the first 3 choices over the latter 2 but I suppose it comes down to what you can do with the change as they are all different prices.
My X v Y would be...
Nank/ Howe v Higgins/Mills
Nank/Howe imo
Thanks guys, Had Howe in some of my earlier teams. Would be comfortable with him as an option. Not keen on Mills. still too young to be reliable enough.
Rance and Cameron v Nank and Marchbank/Z.jones
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 11, 2017, 03:32:23 PM
Rance and Cameron v Nank and Marchbank/Z.jones
Nank/Marchbank imo
Goldy & D. Swallow
Or
Jacobs & T. Phillips
Quote from: billnats on March 11, 2017, 06:44:29 PM
Goldy & D. Swallow
Or
Jacobs & T. Phillips
Goldy & D. Swallow easily
Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.
ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.
Quote from: Diesels Pups on March 11, 2017, 09:16:03 PM
Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.
ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.
see jobe as 100-105 scorer and beams 115+ scorer. up to you if the risk is worth the extra points.
Quote from: crowls on March 11, 2017, 09:25:55 PM
Quote from: Diesels Pups on March 11, 2017, 09:16:03 PM
Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.
ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.
see jobe as 100-105 scorer and beams 115+ scorer. up to you if the risk is worth the extra points.
Yeah, Beams is much more likely to get injured.
Quote from: crowls on March 11, 2017, 09:25:55 PM
Quote from: Diesels Pups on March 11, 2017, 09:16:03 PM
Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.
ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.
see jobe as 100-105 scorer and beams 115+ scorer. up to you if the risk is worth the extra points.
I don't know if Jobe will go back to his 120+, supplement-aided best but I'd back him in to go better than 105. The dude is in excellent shape and has never had a better on-ball brigade around him.
I have a couple:
Rocky vs JPK vs Hanners (that is my order atm)
and
Greene/Caddy + Goldy vs NRoo + Grundy (currently have second option as I don't 100% trust greene/caddy)
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 11, 2017, 11:54:51 PM
I have a couple:
Rocky vs JPK vs Hanners (that is my order atm)
and
Greene/Caddy + Goldy vs NRoo + Grundy (currently have second option as I don't 100% trust greene/caddy)
Green + Caddy
I would go Hanners personally
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 11, 2017, 06:45:12 PM
Quote from: billnats on March 11, 2017, 06:44:29 PM
Goldy & D. Swallow
Or
Jacobs & T. Phillips
Goldy & D. Swallow easily
Ok so I'm keeping Swallow.
Ive had Kelly this whole time because I'm thinking it's his breakout year. But now I'm rethinking:
Goldy + Kelly
Or
Jacobs + Rocky/Treleor
Quote from: billnats on March 12, 2017, 12:06:52 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 11, 2017, 06:45:12 PM
Quote from: billnats on March 11, 2017, 06:44:29 PM
Goldy & D. Swallow
Or
Jacobs & T. Phillips
Goldy & D. Swallow easily
Ok so I'm keeping Swallow.
Ive had Kelly this whole time because I'm thinking it's his breakout year. But now I'm rethinking:
Goldy + Kelly
Or
Jacobs + Rocky/Treleor
Id say goldy and kelly purely based on the thought that i think Sauce is past it now
Quote from: Southstorm on March 11, 2017, 11:19:02 PM
Quote from: crowls on March 11, 2017, 09:25:55 PM
Quote from: Diesels Pups on March 11, 2017, 09:16:03 PM
Hello peeps. Good to be back for season 2017, and good luck to everyone. Assume most of us have been throwing some things around while the pre season games are going on, so one of them for me is which of these lower priced yet risky premiums to add to my side. Been going with Jobe since the start but Beamsy seems to be warming into it but comes with a huge injury risk hanging over his head, and a bit the same for Marc Murphy. Watson the more safer option but gee, Beams can go big if his fitness holds up so someone help. Only going one of these.
ps only just logged on for the first time this year so apologise if this has been discussed a thousand times.
see jobe as 100-105 scorer and beams 115+ scorer. up to you if the risk is worth the extra points.
I don't know if Jobe will go back to his 120+, supplement-aided best but I'd back him in to go better than 105. The dude is in excellent shape and has never had a better on-ball brigade around him.
I agree, being fitter and leaner than past should see him perform at a high level. I would be surprised if he went over 105 but great if he does as I am bomber supporter. Won't be in my team though
Macrae & Bowes vs Touk/Higgins & Swallow? Fighting for F2 & M8 respectively.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 12, 2017, 12:57:01 AM
Macrae & Bowes vs Touk/Higgins & Swallow? Fighting for F2 & M8 respectively.
Higgins and Swallow. Not sure on Bowes at moment
Ok, I have 2 for feedback:
1. Treloar v Rocky
Treloar appears ready to explode, and whilst reports on Rocky suggest he looks fit I've been burnt before and I do worry about his glass ribs and jaw...
2. M.murphy, Macrae and Roughy v Titchell, Higgins and Steele
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 11, 2017, 11:54:51 PM
I have a couple:
Rocky vs JPK vs Hanners (that is my order atm)
and
Greene/Caddy + Goldy vs NRoo + Grundy (currently have second option as I don't 100% trust greene/caddy)
Bump
been dealing with this one for a few days
Shaw vs Docherty
Shaw is more trust worthy , but Doc has a chance to average more
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2017, 02:15:41 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 11, 2017, 11:54:51 PM
I have a couple:
Rocky vs JPK vs Hanners (that is my order atm)
and
Greene/Caddy + Goldy vs NRoo + Grundy (currently have second option as I don't 100% trust greene/caddy)
Bump
Rocky > JPK > Hanners
Caddy and Goldy
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 12, 2017, 01:16:10 AM
Ok, I have 2 for feedback:
1. Treloar v Rocky
Treloar appears ready to explode, and whilst reports on Rocky suggest he looks fit I've been burnt before and I do worry about his glass ribs and jaw...
2. M.murphy, Macrae and Roughy v Titchell, Higgins and Steele
Rocky
Can you afford Titch, Higgins, Roughy? First option if not
JPK, Macrae & Hrovat VS
Titch, Caddy & Higgins?
Quote from: Bluesman on March 12, 2017, 09:01:57 AM
JPK, Macrae & Hrovat VS
Titch, Caddy & Higgins?
2nd option, as i don't really rate the hrovat pick
Touhy vs. Mills
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 12, 2017, 09:44:29 AM
Touhy vs. Mills
Probably go for Mills, but tbh I wouldn't be confident in either if expecting 90+ averages
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 12, 2017, 01:16:10 AM
Ok, I have 2 for feedback:
1. Treloar v Rocky
Treloar appears ready to explode, and whilst reports on Rocky suggest he looks fit I've been burnt before and I do worry about his glass ribs and jaw...
2. M.murphy, Macrae and Roughy v Titchell, Higgins and Steele
Treloar, will continue to improve and lower risk of missing games. Rocky may still out average him but Treloar will have more overall points at end of the year.
2. Tough. For me I would go Mitchell option as High prob mid prem who could make superprem, Higgins I see having more opportunity at North and will improve again this year. Steele could be good but I would have roughy.
Touhy handy for R12 bye.
Adams vs Howe?
Rocky + Swallow + Turner (F6)
Titchell + Swallow + Hoskin-Elliot
Titchell + Phillips + Turner
Quote from: billnats on March 12, 2017, 11:40:56 AM
Rocky + Swallow + Turner (F6)
Titchell + Swallow + Hoskin-Elliot
Titchell + Phillips + Turner
not the last one based on i dont think phillips is a good option
give me rocky swallow turner
Roughead v Caddy
Rocky vs Bont vs Treloar
(if anyone has Rocky's average with Beams in the team that would be helpful)
Quote from: Bully on March 12, 2017, 03:59:45 PM
Rocky vs Bont vs Treloar
(if anyone has Rocky's average with Beams in the team that would be helpful)
Treloar/rocky/Bont
Here's one for the GnR vs midpricers debate:
Marc Murphy + JOM vs GnR (I currently have Jelwood + SPP in those slots, but pretty much and mid + <140k rookie)??
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 12, 2017, 05:05:02 PM
Here's one for the GnR vs midpricers debate:
Marc Murphy + JOM vs GnR (I currently have Jelwood + SPP in those slots, but pretty much and mid + <140k rookie)??
Jelwood spp for me, dont think murphy or JOM will be keepers, so in theory your saving a trade going with the gun and rook
Marc Murphy, Franklin & Greene
vs Treloar, Ryder, Higgins
Quote from: Bully on March 12, 2017, 06:22:00 PM
Marc Murphy, Franklin & Greene
vs Treloar, Ryder, Higgins
Second one without ryder :P
Grundy, Roughead vs Sandilands, Greene
Quote from: Bully on March 12, 2017, 06:38:25 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 12, 2017, 06:34:38 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 12, 2017, 06:22:00 PM
Marc Murphy, Franklin & Greene
vs Treloar, Ryder, Higgins
Second one without ryder :P
Not a fan?
No not really, only time i ever considered him was when i was being cautious with Sandi, and even if i was that now theres Nank for that. Theres quite a few options around the 420k mark that are better IMO. One man who you have already that i love
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 12, 2017, 06:49:29 PM
Grundy, Roughead vs Sandilands, Greene
Sandi Greene. Not a fan of Grundy purely because he cant ruck. He relies on getting heaps of the Pill. Sandi can pull a 100 from 10 touches and we all know what Greene is capable off
O'Meara(M8)/Tarranto(F5) or Picket (M8)/Roughy(F5)
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 12, 2017, 06:52:07 PM
O'Meara(M8)/Tarranto(F5) or Picket (M8)/Roughy(F5)
For points you have to go with option 1, to save trades option 2.
Structure of my team is now set.
All I have to decide is the premiums now:
- Rocky & Treloar
Or
- Titchell & Pendles
Quote from: billnats on March 12, 2017, 08:48:25 PM
Structure of my team is now set.
All I have to decide is the premiums now:
- Rocky & Treloar
Or
- Titchell & Pendles
I'm having a similar dilemma.
I'd say Rocky and Treloar.
I like Treloar over Pendles based on the fact his still young and his only getting better. His scoring will go up even more this year.
Quote from: Cookie Monster on March 12, 2017, 08:54:45 PM
Quote from: billnats on March 12, 2017, 08:48:25 PM
Structure of my team is now set.
All I have to decide is the premiums now:
- Rocky & Treloar
Or
- Titchell & Pendles
I'm having a similar dilemma.
I'd say Rocky and Treloar.
I like Treloar over Pendles based on the fact his still young and his only getting better. His scoring will go up even more this year.
I think I found a way to fit a few in....
Currently I have:
Laird (D2) Swallow (M7) Goldstein (R1)
OR
Tuohy Titchell Ryder
Swallow vs Phillips (Pies) i know everyone thinks Swallow but Phillips is playing well and is a running machine
Pendles, Taranto v M Crouch, J.Steele
Quote from: whynot102 on March 12, 2017, 10:27:55 PM
Swallow vs Phillips (Pies) i know everyone thinks Swallow but Phillips is playing well and is a running machine
I would still go for Swallow, he has averaged 100+ before.
Quote from: uncleswagy on March 12, 2017, 05:20:37 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 12, 2017, 05:05:02 PM
Here's one for the GnR vs midpricers debate:
Marc Murphy + JOM vs GnR (I currently have Jelwood + SPP in those slots, but pretty much and mid + <140k rookie)??
Jelwood spp for me, dont think murphy or JOM will be keepers, so in theory your saving a trade going with the gun and rook
agreed. this is better option.
Quote from: Bubbles on March 12, 2017, 10:34:51 PM
Pendles, Taranto v M Crouch, J.Steele
Pendles + Taranto imo, if Taranto is expected to start
Roughy vs Philips
Quote from: whynot102 on March 12, 2017, 11:15:10 PM
Roughy vs Philips
roughy. proven, returning from knee and illness. will get back to 85+ min and potential 100 but likely 95+ scorer
Laird + Greene vs Lloyd + NRoo
and also Lloyd vs Tuohy. Thanks
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2017, 11:57:22 PM
Laird + Greene vs Lloyd + NRoo
and also Lloyd vs Tuohy. Thanks
For me JPK v Rocky. I know preseason is something not to worry about but both scored rubbish over all 3 games, don't think either of them got over 90. And Rocky had 28 CBA's the other day for an 82. Alarm bells or not?
Quote from: _wato on March 13, 2017, 12:21:18 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2017, 11:57:22 PM
Laird + Greene vs Lloyd + NRoo
and also Lloyd vs Tuohy. Thanks
For me JPK v Rocky. I know preseason is something not to worry about but both scored rubbish over all 3 games, don't think either of them got over 90. And Rocky had 28 CBA's the other day for an 82. Alarm bells or not?
Thanks for the reply. I am having the same dilemma with mid prems. I have opted for Rocky over JPK for a number of reasons:
1. Rocky has had a strong preseason
2. JPK always a slow starter
3. Rocky's ceiling is too god to ignore and not something u wanna miss out on early in the season
4. Rocky a touch cheaper
5. Rocky has averaged 132 in a season. Imagine if he does something similar to that agian.
Only problem I see is Beams taking his points, his average with beams in the side isn't great I don't think.
As for the mid prems and their JLT performance, I don't think anyone has done particularly well aside Treloar and beams. None of the swans boys have tonned I don't think, Selly had a good game today but starts slow and you know you will be able to pick him up for 500 at byes, sloane hasn't played yet, ablett only one game, gray hasn't played, not considering dusty and neale with fyfe back in the team will suffer a bit I reckon. Not really considering anyone else. My mid atm is Danger, Treloar, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Beams, JOM, Swallow. I can suggest Bont because I reckon although he will cop a bit more attention, he scored 97 on the weekend spending 3 quaters forward and scoring 50 and then moves into the mid for the last quater when the games in the ballance and racks up 10 and doubles his score. Just reckon with his ceiling and his ability to go big without racking up more than 30 disposals is uncanny. i know I ranted, hope I helped tho :/
Bob(D3), Higgins(F2) & Nank(F4) and cover for Sandi vs Lloyd, Macrae & WHE
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 13, 2017, 12:39:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 13, 2017, 12:21:18 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2017, 11:57:22 PM
Laird + Greene vs Lloyd + NRoo
and also Lloyd vs Tuohy. Thanks
For me JPK v Rocky. I know preseason is something not to worry about but both scored rubbish over all 3 games, don't think either of them got over 90. And Rocky had 28 CBA's the other day for an 82. Alarm bells or not?
Thanks for the reply. I am having the same dilemma with mid prems. I have opted for Rocky over JPK for a number of reasons:
1. Rocky has had a strong preseason
2. JPK always a slow starter
3. Rocky's ceiling is too god to ignore and not something u wanna miss out on early in the season
4. Rocky a touch cheaper
5. Rocky has averaged 132 in a season. Imagine if he does something similar to that agian.
Only problem I see is Beams taking his points, his average with beams in the side isn't great I don't think.
As for the mid prems and their JLT performance, I don't think anyone has done particularly well aside Treloar and beams. None of the swans boys have tonned I don't think, Selly had a good game today but starts slow and you know you will be able to pick him up for 500 at byes, sloane hasn't played yet, ablett only one game, gray hasn't played, not considering dusty and neale with fyfe back in the team will suffer a bit I reckon. Not really considering anyone else. My mid atm is Danger, Treloar, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Beams, JOM, Swallow. I can suggest Bont because I reckon although he will cop a bit more attention, he scored 97 on the weekend spending 3 quaters forward and scoring 50 and then moves into the mid for the last quater when the games in the ballance and racks up 10 and doubles his score. Just reckon with his ceiling and his ability to go big without racking up more than 30 disposals is uncanny. i know I ranted, hope I helped tho :/
Good summary, the only thing that worries me with Rocky is a potential new role. The coach has stated he will be using him more in a forward capacity and the last time that happened Rocky averaged a shade under 100. The Beams factor is also a worthy concern. For 600k I'd be looking at players who won't deviate in price, Hanners proved that last year, JPK rarely spuds up so won't drop too much. I like the Bont pick but I'm still cautious, hard to believe he's only 20 which is a year earlier than Fyfe's breakout.
with Coniglio out for the next 6 weeks thoughts on Taranto??
Taranto vs. Swallow??
thoughts on realistic avg?? T - 80/S - 90??
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 13, 2017, 04:18:18 PM
with Coniglio out for the next 6 weeks thoughts on Taranto??
Taranto vs. Swallow??
thoughts on realistic avg?? T - 80/S - 90??
After six weeks T will be 318K Scored 480 points Profit 111k, S 384k 540 points profit 104k so effectively the marginal gain in points cost you 73k at start of year. 60 points 73k. Could you have invested that 73k for more than 10point gain elsewhere at the start of the year. Given magic price of 5.14 you should be expecting between 13-14 points for your money.
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2017, 03:36:45 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 13, 2017, 12:39:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 13, 2017, 12:21:18 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2017, 11:57:22 PM
Laird + Greene vs Lloyd + NRoo
and also Lloyd vs Tuohy. Thanks
For me JPK v Rocky. I know preseason is something not to worry about but both scored rubbish over all 3 games, don't think either of them got over 90. And Rocky had 28 CBA's the other day for an 82. Alarm bells or not?
Thanks for the reply. I am having the same dilemma with mid prems. I have opted for Rocky over JPK for a number of reasons:
1. Rocky has had a strong preseason
2. JPK always a slow starter
3. Rocky's ceiling is too god to ignore and not something u wanna miss out on early in the season
4. Rocky a touch cheaper
5. Rocky has averaged 132 in a season. Imagine if he does something similar to that agian.
Only problem I see is Beams taking his points, his average with beams in the side isn't great I don't think.
As for the mid prems and their JLT performance, I don't think anyone has done particularly well aside Treloar and beams. None of the swans boys have tonned I don't think, Selly had a good game today but starts slow and you know you will be able to pick him up for 500 at byes, sloane hasn't played yet, ablett only one game, gray hasn't played, not considering dusty and neale with fyfe back in the team will suffer a bit I reckon. Not really considering anyone else. My mid atm is Danger, Treloar, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Beams, JOM, Swallow. I can suggest Bont because I reckon although he will cop a bit more attention, he scored 97 on the weekend spending 3 quaters forward and scoring 50 and then moves into the mid for the last quater when the games in the ballance and racks up 10 and doubles his score. Just reckon with his ceiling and his ability to go big without racking up more than 30 disposals is uncanny. i know I ranted, hope I helped tho :/
Good summary, the only thing that worries me with Rocky is a potential new role. The coach has stated he will be using him more in a forward capacity and the last time that happened Rocky averaged a shade under 100. The Beams factor is also a worthy concern. For 600k I'd be looking at players who won't deviate in price, Hanners proved that last year, JPK rarely spuds up so won't drop too much. I like the Bont pick but I'm still cautious, hard to believe he's only 20 which is a year earlier than Fyfe's breakout.
I did the maths the other week and Rockys average playing in 18 games with Beams is 101. That is taking out the scores of 0 and 41 he got playing with Beams when Rockliff got injured. Beams average in those games was about 112 by memory.
Quote from: dmac07 on March 13, 2017, 10:05:11 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2017, 03:36:45 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 13, 2017, 12:39:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 13, 2017, 12:21:18 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2017, 11:57:22 PM
Laird + Greene vs Lloyd + NRoo
and also Lloyd vs Tuohy. Thanks
For me JPK v Rocky. I know preseason is something not to worry about but both scored rubbish over all 3 games, don't think either of them got over 90. And Rocky had 28 CBA's the other day for an 82. Alarm bells or not?
Thanks for the reply. I am having the same dilemma with mid prems. I have opted for Rocky over JPK for a number of reasons:
1. Rocky has had a strong preseason
2. JPK always a slow starter
3. Rocky's ceiling is too god to ignore and not something u wanna miss out on early in the season
4. Rocky a touch cheaper
5. Rocky has averaged 132 in a season. Imagine if he does something similar to that agian.
Only problem I see is Beams taking his points, his average with beams in the side isn't great I don't think.
As for the mid prems and their JLT performance, I don't think anyone has done particularly well aside Treloar and beams. None of the swans boys have tonned I don't think, Selly had a good game today but starts slow and you know you will be able to pick him up for 500 at byes, sloane hasn't played yet, ablett only one game, gray hasn't played, not considering dusty and neale with fyfe back in the team will suffer a bit I reckon. Not really considering anyone else. My mid atm is Danger, Treloar, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Beams, JOM, Swallow. I can suggest Bont because I reckon although he will cop a bit more attention, he scored 97 on the weekend spending 3 quaters forward and scoring 50 and then moves into the mid for the last quater when the games in the ballance and racks up 10 and doubles his score. Just reckon with his ceiling and his ability to go big without racking up more than 30 disposals is uncanny. i know I ranted, hope I helped tho :/
Good summary, the only thing that worries me with Rocky is a potential new role. The coach has stated he will be using him more in a forward capacity and the last time that happened Rocky averaged a shade under 100. The Beams factor is also a worthy concern. For 600k I'd be looking at players who won't deviate in price, Hanners proved that last year, JPK rarely spuds up so won't drop too much. I like the Bont pick but I'm still cautious, hard to believe he's only 20 which is a year earlier than Fyfe's breakout.
I did the maths the other week and Rockys average playing in 18 games with Beams is 101. That is taking out the scores of 0 and 41 he got playing with Beams when Rockliff got injured. Beams average in those games was about 112 by memory.
That's gotta be a deal breaker.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 13, 2017, 01:58:53 AM
Bob(D3), Higgins(F2) & Nank(F4) and cover for Sandi vs Lloyd, Macrae & WHE
Lloyd, Macare and whe. You have 2 keepers and one cash cow to upgrade. In my opinion Bob, Higgins and Nank, while scoring similar to start the year as the other group will all be a little short of keepers, meaning 3 upgrades.
D3 and M6
Tuohy and Beams vs Docherty and Omeara.
Quote from: dmac07 on March 13, 2017, 10:21:24 PM
D3 and M6
Tuohy and Beams vs Docherty and Omeara.
I think Beams is a must have. Nothing wrong with option 2 though.
Rough v Steele (&20k)
Quote from: enzedder on March 13, 2017, 10:27:55 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 13, 2017, 10:21:24 PM
D3 and M6
Tuohy and Beams vs Docherty and Omeara.
I think Beams is a must have. Nothing wrong with option 2 though.
Rough v Steele (&20k)
I think Steele, and also that about 90% of the population will go the other way. Have backed this opinion with my team selection and won't waver to popular opinion.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 13, 2017, 10:35:57 PM
Quote from: enzedder on March 13, 2017, 10:27:55 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 13, 2017, 10:21:24 PM
D3 and M6
Tuohy and Beams vs Docherty and Omeara.
I think Beams is a must have. Nothing wrong with option 2 though.
Rough v Steele (&20k)
I think Steele, and also that about 90% of the population will go the other way. Have backed this opinion with my team selection and won't waver to popular opinion.
Thanks mate. I am seriously considering it.
Witts (R2) and Nankervis (F5) :P
OR
Nank (R2) and Taranto/WH-E/Ainsworth/Turner (F5) :o
Quote from: Sven on March 13, 2017, 11:14:49 PM
Witts (R2) and Nankervis (F5) :P
OR
Nank (R2) and Taranto/WH-E/Ainsworth/Turner (F5) :o
Nank and Taranto
A juicy one...
Marchbank D3 & Higgins
vs
Jones(Syd) D3 & Steele
Quote from: petefisker on March 13, 2017, 11:42:14 PM
A juicy one...
Marchbank D3 & Higgins
vs
Jones(Syd) D3 & Steele
Option 1 on both counts
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2017, 11:47:43 PM
Quote from: petefisker on March 13, 2017, 11:42:14 PM
A juicy one...
Marchbank D3 & Higgins
vs
Jones(Syd) D3 & Steele
Option 1 on both counts
Hmm, how come? I can see Steele outscoring Higgins who has afew ?? And Jones easily outscoring marchbank.
Quote from: petefisker on March 13, 2017, 11:53:22 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2017, 11:47:43 PM
Quote from: petefisker on March 13, 2017, 11:42:14 PM
A juicy one...
Marchbank D3 & Higgins
vs
Jones(Syd) D3 & Steele
Option 1 on both counts
Hmm, how come? I can see Steele outscoring Higgins who has afew ?? And Jones easily outscoring marchbank.
Jones is an yo-yo with his form, his lowest scores last year were 21, 23, 34, 42, 45 & 46. Marchbank should have a more favourable role and better JS.
Steele is a bit of a dark horse but is coming off a season having averaged only 60. It's possible he lifts that to 90 but we're talking long odds if you look at historical player development.
Higgins has proven he can score well and has a 95 season under his belt. The fact he's now a permanent midfielder should see his numbers increase accordingly. There is of course the issue of durability but one has to roll the dice occasionally. His form in the preseason has been top shelf and at worst he should edge over the 500k mark provided he doesn't get injured. The other advantage in going the higher priced player is you can always trade down in round 3 if things look dire.
Quote from: petefisker on March 13, 2017, 11:53:22 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2017, 11:47:43 PM
Quote from: petefisker on March 13, 2017, 11:42:14 PM
A juicy one...
Marchbank D3 & Higgins
vs
Jones(Syd) D3 & Steele
Option 1 on both counts
Hmm, how come? I can see Steele outscoring Higgins who has afew ?? And Jones easily outscoring marchbank.
I have Steele atm so I agree he will out score Higgins. Option 2 for me. Have Marchbank at D4, so Jones/Lloyd are good options for D3
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2017, 10:13:59 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 13, 2017, 10:05:11 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2017, 03:36:45 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 13, 2017, 12:39:55 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 13, 2017, 12:21:18 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 12, 2017, 11:57:22 PM
Laird + Greene vs Lloyd + NRoo
and also Lloyd vs Tuohy. Thanks
For me JPK v Rocky. I know preseason is something not to worry about but both scored rubbish over all 3 games, don't think either of them got over 90. And Rocky had 28 CBA's the other day for an 82. Alarm bells or not?
Thanks for the reply. I am having the same dilemma with mid prems. I have opted for Rocky over JPK for a number of reasons:
1. Rocky has had a strong preseason
2. JPK always a slow starter
3. Rocky's ceiling is too god to ignore and not something u wanna miss out on early in the season
4. Rocky a touch cheaper
5. Rocky has averaged 132 in a season. Imagine if he does something similar to that agian.
Only problem I see is Beams taking his points, his average with beams in the side isn't great I don't think.
As for the mid prems and their JLT performance, I don't think anyone has done particularly well aside Treloar and beams. None of the swans boys have tonned I don't think, Selly had a good game today but starts slow and you know you will be able to pick him up for 500 at byes, sloane hasn't played yet, ablett only one game, gray hasn't played, not considering dusty and neale with fyfe back in the team will suffer a bit I reckon. Not really considering anyone else. My mid atm is Danger, Treloar, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Beams, JOM, Swallow. I can suggest Bont because I reckon although he will cop a bit more attention, he scored 97 on the weekend spending 3 quaters forward and scoring 50 and then moves into the mid for the last quater when the games in the ballance and racks up 10 and doubles his score. Just reckon with his ceiling and his ability to go big without racking up more than 30 disposals is uncanny. i know I ranted, hope I helped tho :/
Good summary, the only thing that worries me with Rocky is a potential new role. The coach has stated he will be using him more in a forward capacity and the last time that happened Rocky averaged a shade under 100. The Beams factor is also a worthy concern. For 600k I'd be looking at players who won't deviate in price, Hanners proved that last year, JPK rarely spuds up so won't drop too much. I like the Bont pick but I'm still cautious, hard to believe he's only 20 which is a year earlier than Fyfe's breakout.
I did the maths the other week and Rockys average playing in 18 games with Beams is 101. That is taking out the scores of 0 and 41 he got playing with Beams when Rockliff got injured. Beams average in those games was about 112 by memory.
That's gotta be a deal breaker.
If only it was accurate
got $620.3K to spend on my (M2)
JPK/Hanners/Jelwood/Rocky/Neale/Priddis/Zerrett??
I've got Danger/Treloar/Fyfe/Titch/Beams/JOM/Swallow as my starting 7, just need a super premo to sit there @ M2
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 14, 2017, 01:25:19 PM
got $620.3K to spend on my (M2)
JPK/Hanners/Jelwood/Rocky/Neale/Priddis/Zerrett??
I've got Danger/Treloar/Fyfe/Titch/Beams/JOM/Swallow as my starting 7, just need a super premo to sit there @ M2
Jeez mate, you haven't left a lot of room for error in those mids! Beams + JOM + Swallow as M6-8 is a bit of overkill imo, I think you'll be left very short in other areas and your on-field rookies will let you down massively. My advice (if you're set on having those 3) is to bring a rookie onto the field in mids and boost your stocks elsewhere.
To answer your question, if I had to pick one (irrespective of byes) it would be JPK, followed closely by Hanners/Selwood.
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 14, 2017, 01:25:19 PM
got $620.3K to spend on my (M2)
JPK/Hanners/Jelwood/Rocky/Neale/Priddis/Zerrett??
I've got Danger/Treloar/Fyfe/Titch/Beams/JOM/Swallow as my starting 7, just need a super premo to sit there @ M2
JPK, Selwood, Hanners, Priddis in that order
Quote from: MC on March 14, 2017, 01:59:27 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 14, 2017, 01:25:19 PM
got $620.3K to spend on my (M2)
JPK/Hanners/Jelwood/Rocky/Neale/Priddis/Zerrett??
I've got Danger/Treloar/Fyfe/Titch/Beams/JOM/Swallow as my starting 7, just need a super premo to sit there @ M2
Jeez mate, you haven't left a lot of room for error in those mids! Beams + JOM + Swallow as M6-8 is a bit of overkill imo, I think you'll be left very short in other areas and your on-field rookies will let you down massively. My advice (if you're set on having those 3) is to bring a rookie onto the field in mids and boost your stocks elsewhere.
To answer your question, if I had to pick one (irrespective of byes) it would be JPK, followed closely by Hanners/Selwood.
C'mon MC it is hard enough to make top 1% without giving out good advice the week before round 1.
Totally agree having two cheap rucks and strengthening our other lines will come back and bite us in the butt. It does look good on paper. Just feels too risky for my comfort.
2017 has some great value selections and most of us will have some of them. My preferred structure is 3/5/1/3 for keepers and that does not include Beams JOM, Swallow, or Roughy as keepers. My rookies are 4/4/1/4 that leaves 4 mid pricers. 1/2/1/1.
Not saying this will remain the same after we see the teams but is the structure I am working on.
Quote from: MC on March 14, 2017, 01:59:27 PM
Jeez mate, you haven't left a lot of room for error in those mids! Beams + JOM + Swallow as M6-8 is a bit of overkill imo, I think you'll be left very short in other areas and your on-field rookies will let you down massively.
thanks for the advice, i actually like my setup.
DEF - 2/0/6 (Rance/Laird)
MIDS - 5/3/3
RUC - 1/1/1 (Gawn/Sandi)
FWD - 2/2/4 (Dahl/Buddy/Higs/Nank)
If ya had to pick two out of:
Ryder
Roughy
Nankervis
Quote from: auscoyote on March 14, 2017, 04:05:14 PM
If ya had to pick two out of:
Ryder
Roughy
Nankervis
Roughy and Nank
Pick 2 of:
Shaw, Adams and Laird
(Already have Treloar/Pendles in the mids and Hampton/Otten in def)
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 14, 2017, 04:08:02 PM
Pick 2 of:
Shaw, Adams and Laird
(Already have Treloar/Pendles in the mids and Hampton/Otten in def)
Shaw & Laird
Quote from: Bully on March 14, 2017, 04:12:14 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 14, 2017, 04:08:02 PM
Pick 2 of:
Shaw, Adams and Laird
(Already have Treloar/Pendles in the mids and Hampton/Otten in def)
Shaw & Laird
Yep agree
Quote from: auscoyote on March 14, 2017, 04:05:14 PM
If ya had to pick two out of:
Ryder
Roughy
Nankervis
Rough Ryder has (have) the runs on the board! Nankervis has barely scored above 80, let alone averaged it! Only point of contention for me with Ryder is his early bye round, though his discount might offset that just enough.
Smokies from Last year i was hoping to get up and going, and as usual i wont pick them and they pop 105+ just like sidebottom last year.
M. Duncan vs D. Shiel
Thoughts?
Duncan had foot injury which interrupted his preseason last year caddy now out of the picture dangerwood will be offloading alot of the pill to an outside player i see being either guthrie or duncan , JLT 2017 with a TOG PPM *100 AVG of 150.19 in which he was playing half games and scoring avg 80
Dylan shiel has the support, in which allows him to be let loose so wont get tagged, winning team, like the way he goes about his footy.
thinking both players can up +10 and be 100 avg players this year.
Quote from: aussied on March 14, 2017, 11:34:08 PM
Smokies from Last year i was hoping to get up and going, and as usual i wont pick them and they pop 105+ just like sidebottom last year.
M. Duncan vs D. Shiel
Thoughts?
Duncan had foot injury which interrupted his preseason last year caddy now out of the picture dangerwood will be offloading alot of the pill to an outside player i see being either guthrie or duncan , JLT 2017 with a TOG PPM *100 AVG of 150.19 in which he was playing half games and scoring avg 80
Dylan shiel has the support, in which allows him to be let loose so wont get tagged, winning team, like the way he goes about his footy.
thinking both players can up +10 and be 100 avg players this year.
I don't like either but if I had to choose I would take Shiel.
Swallow and WHE vs Steele and Rookie
Also Rocky vs Selwood vs JPK in which order?
Quote from: tommy10 on March 15, 2017, 12:42:54 AM
Swallow and WHE vs Steele and Rookie
Also Rocky vs Selwood vs JPK in which order?
Swallow & WHE
JPK, Selwood, Rocky
San Docherty v Heath Shaw
Would of been done before but interested to see what people think, Shaw's ownership has gone through the roof but for good reason he is a superstar and doesn't look like slowing down
Witts Ryder and Touhy vs Gawn Steele and Otten?
Quote from: Bubbles on March 15, 2017, 01:33:54 AM
San Docherty v Heath Shaw
Would of been done before but interested to see what people think, Shaw's ownership has gone through the roof but for good reason he is a superstar and doesn't look like slowing down
I have Shaw slightly ahead purely based on the fact that he has the runs on the board. Think we will all have both by seasons end though
Trealor v Rocky
Franklin v Greene v Caddy
Quote from: Money Shot on March 15, 2017, 07:41:11 AM
Trealor v Rocky
Franklin v Greene v Caddy
Treloar
Tough one - prob in order you have them
Docherty & WHE versus
Z.Jones & Franklin?
Quote from: Bluesman on March 15, 2017, 10:51:19 AM
Docherty & WHE versus
Z.Jones & Franklin?
Docherty and WHE imo
JPK V Treloar?
JPK - proven sc beast
Hannerbury + mid rookie (m8) + defence rookie (d4)
Vs
O'meara + Swallow (m8) + Marchbank
Current Mids
Danger JPK Treloar Jelwood Fyfe Beams
Am now thinking of going from
Adams (D3) & Swallow
to
Rookie & Hannerbury
Removes some of the risk in the team and Leaves enough cash also to go Goldy to Gawn if spencer is not named
Turner v Bowes
Marchbank vs. Thurlow
The Bont vs Titchell?
Tmac & Swallow vs Roo & Marchbank?
Quote from: SilverLion on March 15, 2017, 08:19:06 PM
Marchbank vs. Thurlow
Marchbank just (considering price mainly)
Quote from: Millsy999 on March 15, 2017, 08:21:59 PM
The Bont vs Titchell?
Tmac & Swallow vs Roo & Marchbank?
Titchell just
Roo & Marchbank as 1 definite keeper and cheaper cheapie
Another quick one, WHE vs Taranto
Why not both SL. unless you need extra cash.
Witts Ryder and Touhy vs Gawn Steele and Otten?
Quote from: thornz23 on March 15, 2017, 10:21:43 PM
Witts Ryder and Touhy vs Gawn Steele and Otten?
Why not make Gawn into Hickey or even Nank and to a lesser extent Witts? If he is the only ruck selected Rd1 then sure have him.
I'd say Witts-Steele and use the cash to get someone better. Or pick Touhy and upgrade elsewhere if needed.
I'm sure this has been said before but...
JPK v Parker v Hannebury
I'm sure you can't really go wrong with either.
I'd have the 3 swans in that order
Hanners, JPK, Parker but all will be top 15 mids.
Tom Mitchell and Tom Boyd v David Swallow and Max Gawn
(For Fantasy btw)
McCarthy v Taranto
McCarthy = 30's and 40's with great JS and the odd half decent game
Or
Taranto = 65-75 with shakey JS but a much higher scoring ceiling! feel like it would only take 2 or 3 bad games in a row for him to be dropped back to the 2's.
Lloyd vs Tuohy?
Quote from: Bubbles on March 16, 2017, 12:54:45 AM
McCarthy v Taranto
McCarthy = 30's and 40's with great JS and the odd half decent game
Or
Taranto = 65-75 with shakey JS but a much higher scoring ceiling! feel like it would only take 2 or 3 bad games in a row for him to be dropped back to the 2's.
Can't go wrong with either (ideally you should have both), but id start taranto based on scoring potential
Quote from: tommy10 on March 16, 2017, 12:56:07 AM
Lloyd vs Tuohy?
Fell like neither will be top 10 defenders but if I had to pick one id go lloyd
i need to pick three of:
Taranto* vs WHE vs McCarthy* vs Turner vs Bowes* *= currently running with
D2...?
Shaw. (Adams vs Laird). Howe. + Rookies....
Quote from: Sicko on March 16, 2017, 11:59:06 AM
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 16, 2017, 11:44:44 AM
D2...?
Shaw. (Adams vs Laird). Howe. + Rookies....
Yeah for D2, got Doc D1 and Laird D3. Also up front need one of the rookies to play got Taranto D5
:) Taranto M or F 5 ?
JPK vs Jelwood?!
Quote from: john23132 on March 16, 2017, 01:39:15 PM
JPK vs Jelwood?!
JPK slightly over Jelwood but your splitting hairs
Beams + Roughie vs O'Meara + Macrae?
Steele V O'meara? O'meara's injury history worries me...
Quote from: Mondoftw on March 16, 2017, 03:31:46 PM
Steele V O'meara? O'meara's injury history worries me...
O'Meara, you only need 7 games out of him.
Is Macrae actually a must ??
I havent had him pre season. I just dont know why i donr rate him. I currently have Franklin and Lynch instead
Pick 2 of Franklin, Lynch and Macrae
Franklin and Macrae...just.
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 16, 2017, 03:59:02 PM
Is Macrae actually a must ??
I havent had him pre season. I just dont know why i donr rate him. I currently have Franklin and Lynch instead
Pick 2 of Franklin, Lynch and Macrae
If in doubt pick the mid, this is a standard deviation issue. Chances are both Franklin & Lynch will drop by more than Macrae.
Grundy v Stef Martin
JOM (95) M7 vs. Roughy (90) F4
Quote from: Money Shot on March 15, 2017, 11:25:14 PM
Hanners, JPK, Parker but all will be top 15 mids.
Tom Mitchell and Tom Boyd v David Swallow and Max Gawn
(For Fantasy btw)
Swallow and Gawn, but see if Spencer is named round 1 or not. Don't mind the idea of Boyd now with the Dogs rucks injured, and Titch should be a good pick as well.
Quote from: eg6914 on March 16, 2017, 10:39:55 AM
i need to pick three of:
Taranto* vs WHE vs McCarthy* vs Turner vs Bowes* *= currently running with
Taranto, Bowes, Turner imo
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 16, 2017, 11:44:44 AM
D2...?
Shaw. (Adams vs Laird). Howe. + Rookies....
Laird over Adams for me, think he will push 100 and Adams could definitely beat that, but a much greater injury risk
Quote from: Ringo on March 16, 2017, 02:49:11 PM
Quote from: colmullet on March 16, 2017, 01:43:36 PM
Quote from: john23132 on March 16, 2017, 01:39:15 PM
JPK vs Jelwood?!
JPK slightly over Jelwood but your splitting hairs
Agree and I have both.
I'd possibly have Jelwood over JPK tbh, but had both in my team over the last few weeks, along with Treloar and Zorko. Still haven't made up my mind ahaha
Quote from: Bubbles on March 16, 2017, 05:20:48 PM
Grundy v Stef Martin
Stef, has gone 110+ in both 2014 and 2015. But if Archie is named round 1 (although I don't see him playing more than 3 games for the year if Stef is 100% fit), then go with Grundy.
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 16, 2017, 06:40:33 PM
JOM (95) M7 vs. Roughy (90) F4
I prefer JOM, see Roughy going closer to 85 tbqh
Quote from: GoLions on March 16, 2017, 06:47:45 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 16, 2017, 06:40:33 PM
JOM (95) M7 vs. Roughy (90) F4
I prefer JOM, see Roughy going closer to 85 tbqh
85? hmm... not that bad.
WHE & Taranto vs. Roughy & Rookie under $148k (Houston/black/Parfitt)
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 16, 2017, 06:59:48 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 16, 2017, 06:47:45 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 16, 2017, 06:40:33 PM
JOM (95) M7 vs. Roughy (90) F4
I prefer JOM, see Roughy going closer to 85 tbqh
85? hmm... not that bad.
WHE & Taranto vs. Roughy & Rookie under $148k (Houston/black/Parfitt)
Roughy & Parfitt
Quote from: GoLions on March 16, 2017, 06:45:34 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 16, 2017, 02:49:11 PM
Quote from: colmullet on March 16, 2017, 01:43:36 PM
Quote from: john23132 on March 16, 2017, 01:39:15 PM
JPK vs Jelwood?!
JPK slightly over Jelwood but your splitting hairs
Agree and I have both.
I'd possibly have Jelwood over JPK tbh, but had both in my team over the last few weeks, along with Treloar and Zorko. Still haven't made up my mind ahaha
Geelong do not play at Simonds stadium until round 9. Selwood averaged 124.38 there in 8 games last year.
I'd would not be starting him as I think he could drop a little before bringing him in. At games at all other venues including the Qualifying Final he averaged 103.46 in 2016
Witts (R2) vs WHE (F3)
which one will average higher?
Quote from: benny_fraz on March 16, 2017, 10:30:41 PM
Witts (R2) vs WHE (F3)
which one will average higher?
Witts easily.
Quote from: Bully on March 16, 2017, 04:09:17 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 16, 2017, 03:59:02 PM
Is Macrae actually a must ??
I havent had him pre season. I just dont know why i donr rate him. I currently have Franklin and Lynch instead
Pick 2 of Franklin, Lynch and Macrae
If in doubt pick the mid, this is a standard deviation issue. Chances are both Franklin & Lynch will drop by more than Macrae.
heed the voice of wisdom
Quote from: Bully on March 16, 2017, 10:48:47 PM
Quote from: benny_fraz on March 16, 2017, 10:30:41 PM
Witts (R2) vs WHE (F3)
which one will average higher?
Witts easily.
Id rather have WHE in my team but not at F3
Newman (D7) + Gawn (R1) + Roughead (F3) + Nankervis (F4)
VS
Laird (D3) + Nankervis (R1) + Macrae (F2) + Rookie <130k (F7)
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 16, 2017, 11:49:26 PM
Newman (D7) + Gawn (R1) + Roughead (F3) + Nankervis (F4)
VS
Laird (D3) + Nankervis (R1) + Macrae (F2) + Rookie <130k (F7)
Top one, saw nank R1 and didnt have to look further
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 16, 2017, 11:49:26 PM
Newman (D7) + Gawn (R1) + Roughead (F3) + Nankervis (F4)
VS
Laird (D3) + Nankervis (R1) + Macrae (F2) + Rookie <130k (F7)
I'd take the first option.
Ryder/Roughy/McCarthy vs Lynch/Nankervis/Black.
Quote from: batt on March 16, 2017, 11:51:18 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 16, 2017, 11:49:26 PM
Newman (D7) + Gawn (R1) + Roughead (F3) + Nankervis (F4)
VS
Laird (D3) + Nankervis (R1) + Macrae (F2) + Rookie <130k (F7)
I'd take the first option.
Ryder/Roughy/McCarthy vs Lynch/Nankervis/Black.
Go a different rookie though.
Nank + Roughy v Ryder + Steele
Quote from: _wato on March 17, 2017, 02:04:45 AM
Nank + Roughy v Ryder + Steele
I like both, 2nd if you want some PODs, 1st if you wanna play it safer.
Quote from: _wato on March 17, 2017, 02:04:45 AMGo a different rookie though.
Nank + Roughy v Ryder + Steele
I'm firmly in the Ryder + Steele camp. But I get the sense Id be in the minority on that one.
Tough one.
T.Adams + D.Martin Vs Ablett + Howe.
Quote from: Ingram on March 17, 2017, 02:34:26 AM
Tough one.
T.Adams + D.Martin Vs Ablett + Howe.
Ablett + Howe for mine
Rough + Steele
vs
Buddy/Macrae + Taranto
McRae and Taranto comfirtably imo.
With so many other mid pricers around any chance for a good gun n rookie combo I'd be all over. Save a trade and cash generation. Still have my doubts on roughy scoring well enough to be a keeper at years end.
Parker V JPK.
One picked by significantly less interestingly
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 17, 2017, 12:43:41 PM
Parker V JPK.
One picked by significantly less interestingly
Parker had off season surgery which turned people off but he looked great in the last JLT match.
Pretty much flip a coin but maybe JPK for consistency.
Adams/J Barrett v Thurlow/Swallow +100k
Adams + 2 off Miles/Houston/Butler vs Thurlow + Swallow +Tarranto
Selwood/Macrae v Hanners/Greene
Who's everyone got at D7?
It's one of Vickers-Willis/Otten/Stewert
Any other options?
Quote from: Cookie Monster on March 17, 2017, 05:10:46 PM
Who's everyone got at D7?
It's one of Vickers-Willis/Otten/Stewert
Any other options?
Hibberd, Guthrie, Newman
which player should i get for my sc draft team in my fwd line?
Douglas, LeCras, Dsmith, Walters, shane edwards, billings, caleb daniel, greenwood or some other cheapish player who hopefully hasnt been selected
thanks
Quote from: Bubbles on March 17, 2017, 05:02:37 PM
Selwood/Macrae v Hanners/Greene
hanners and Greene
Nank and Hanners vs Sandi and Ablett
Quote from: Maca24 on March 17, 2017, 06:46:59 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 17, 2017, 05:02:37 PM
Selwood/Macrae v Hanners/Greene
hanners and Greene
Nank and Hanners vs Sandi and Ablett
Nank and Hanners
WHE vs Bowes vs Florient vs Ainsworth
Quote from: tommy10 on March 17, 2017, 07:06:47 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on March 17, 2017, 06:46:59 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 17, 2017, 05:02:37 PM
Selwood/Macrae v Hanners/Greene
hanners and Greene
Nank and Hanners vs Sandi and Ablett
Nank and Hanners Sandi and Ablett by a mileeee
WHE vs Bowes vs Florient vs Ainsworth
NRoo + Witts v Goldy + Turner
Goldy and Turner for me - Mainly because I think Roo is overpriced,
Quote from: tommy10 on March 17, 2017, 07:06:47 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on March 17, 2017, 06:46:59 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 17, 2017, 05:02:37 PM
Selwood/Macrae v Hanners/Greene
hanners and Greene
Nank and Hanners vs Sandi and Ablett
Nank and Hanners
WHE vs Bowes vs Florient vs Ainsworth
Sandi and Hanners probably a better option. Not convinced on the lil master as he looks to play more up forward.
Shaw, , Rance/Adams (D1 & D2) & McCarthy/WHE (D5) vs. Lloyd, Tuohy (D2 & D3) & Higgins (F3)
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 18, 2017, 08:43:08 AM
Shaw, , Rance/Adams (D1 & D2) & McCarthy/WHE (D5) vs. Lloyd, Tuohy (D2 & D3) & Higgins (F3)
Shaw, Adams, WHE easily. 2 year round keepers. All 3 risky in the second option.
Higgins vs Ryder (F4)
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 17, 2017, 06:30:35 PM
which player should i get for my sc draft team in my fwd line?
Douglas, LeCras, Dsmith, Walters, shane edwards, billings, caleb daniel, greenwood or some other cheapish player who hopefully hasnt been selected
thanks
Caleb Daniel I think
Goldstein + Taranto v Macrae + Witts
With the Witts combo I also I get 66k cash
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 18, 2017, 11:41:50 AM
Goldstein + Taranto v Macrae + Witts
With the Witts combo I also I get 66k cash
You should score more with Goldy/ Taranto.
Depend what you will do with the extra $$$
I'd go the Goldy/ Tarantino option.
Nick Reiwoldt vs Tom Mitchell (with fwd/mid rookie swapping swapping)
Quote from: cortez on March 18, 2017, 12:00:59 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 18, 2017, 11:41:50 AM
Goldstein + Taranto v Macrae + Witts
With the Witts combo I also I get 66k cash
You should score more with Goldy/ Taranto.
Depend what you will do with the extra $$$
I'd go the Goldy/ Tarantino option.
Nick Reiwoldt vs Tom Mitchell (with fwd/mid rookie swapping swapping)
Even though Mitchell might outscore Riewoldt by 5 points per week I'd go Riewoldt. I think he is likely to be a top 4-5 scorer as a fwd but I dont think Mitchell will be a top 8 scoring mid.
Parker vs Treloar? Downgrading one to Beams I think. Dont know which one to keep.
Quote from: dmac07 on March 18, 2017, 01:37:04 PM
Parker vs Treloar? Downgrading one to Beams I think. Dont know which one to keep.
Treloar
Steele v Taranto + 165k
Quote from: cortez on March 18, 2017, 12:00:59 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 18, 2017, 11:41:50 AM
Goldstein + Taranto v Macrae + Witts
With the Witts combo I also I get 66k cash
You should score more with Goldy/ Taranto.
Depend what you will do with the extra $$$
I'd go the Goldy/ Tarantino option.
Nick Reiwoldt vs Tom Mitchell (with fwd/mid rookie swapping swapping)
Tom Mitchell imo
Pick one of Selwwod v Sloane v Titchell v Rocky v Treloar or put in order will be M4 after Danger, Pendles, JPK
Treloar
Selwood
Rocky
Titchell
Sloane
Quote from: Ringo on March 18, 2017, 03:49:08 PM
Pick one of Selwwod v Sloane v Titchell v Rocky v Treloar or put in order will be M4 after Danger, Pendles, JPK
Selwood
Rocky
Treloar
Sloane
Which way to go...
Laird (D2), O'Meara (M6), Goldstein (R1) and Nankervis (F5)
Or
Tuohy (D2), Titchell (M6), Nankervis (R1 with Witts R3) and Steele (F5)
Quote from: billnats on March 19, 2017, 11:42:55 AM
Which way to go...
Laird (D2), O'Meara (M6), Goldstein (R1) and Nankervis (F5)
Or
Tuohy (D2), Titchell (M6), Nankervis (R1 with Witts R3) and Steele (F5)
first by miles to me
Quote from: uncleswagy on March 19, 2017, 11:52:42 AM
Quote from: billnats on March 19, 2017, 11:42:55 AM
Which way to go...
Laird (D2), O'Meara (M6), Goldstein (R1) and Nankervis (F5)
Or
Tuohy (D2), Titchell (M6), Nankervis (R1 with Witts R3) and Steele (F5)
first by miles to me
This.
Quote from: Ringo on March 18, 2017, 03:49:08 PM
Pick one of Selwwod v Sloane v Titchell v Rocky v Treloar or put in order will be M4 after Danger, Pendles, JPK
Treloar
Titch
Jelwood
Rocky
Sloane
Quote from: cortez on March 18, 2017, 12:00:59 PM
Nick Reiwoldt vs Tom Mitchell (with fwd/mid rookie swapping swapping)
50/50, i've got both but if i had to choose one it'd be Titch.
i believe he could go 110+
Quote from: GoLions on March 18, 2017, 01:40:47 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 18, 2017, 01:37:04 PM
Parker vs Treloar? Downgrading one to Beams I think. Dont know which one to keep.
Treloar
Quote from: frenzy on March 18, 2017, 11:31:58 AM
Higgins vs Ryder (F4)
Higgins
Quote from: dmac07 on March 18, 2017, 10:54:23 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 18, 2017, 08:43:08 AM
Shaw, , Rance/Adams (D1 & D2) & McCarthy/WHE (D5) vs. Lloyd, Tuohy (D2 & D3) & Higgins (F3)
Shaw, Adams, WHE easily. 2 year round keepers. All 3 risky in the second option.
Cheers Mate, i went with the 2 DEF keeper option too.
Jackson Ramsay v Zak Jones
Goldy (R1) Taranto (f5) v Witts (R2), Caddy (f2) +91K
Docherty (D1) & Swallow (M8)
or
Pendlebury/Kennedy (M2) & Marchbank (D4)
Quote from: Fid on March 19, 2017, 02:54:36 PM
Jackson Ramsay v Zak Jones
Zak Jones
Quote from: crowls on March 19, 2017, 03:05:27 PM
Goldy (R1) Taranto (f5) v Witts (R2), Caddy (f2) +91K
Witts and Caddy - Depends though on how you spend the 91k Goldy/Taranto 170 Witts/Caddy 180
Quote from: benny_fraz on March 19, 2017, 03:23:17 PM
Docherty (D1) & Swallow (M8)
or
Pendlebury/Kennedy (M2) & Marchbank (D4)
Toss of coin but if pressed 2 mainly beacuse of additional C and VC options.
Lloyd vs Roberton vs Macmillon
Quote from: no eye deer on March 19, 2017, 04:40:20 PM
Lloyd vs Roberton vs Macmillon
Lloyd for me, Macmillan a close second
Quote from: Ringo on March 19, 2017, 03:36:24 PMGoldy/Taranto 170 Witts/Caddy 180
quick question Ringo, you reckon that Goldy/Taranto will go 170, and Witts/Caddy 180??
i know Witts is getting a lot of love recently, but a 90 for him is a bit of a stretch isnt it??
Quote from: Ringo on March 19, 2017, 03:36:24 PM
Quote from: benny_fraz on March 19, 2017, 03:23:17 PM
Docherty (D1) & Swallow (M8)
or
Pendlebury/Kennedy (M2) & Marchbank (D4)
Toss of coin but if pressed 2 mainly beacuse of additional C and VC options.
This.
Quote from: no eye deer on March 19, 2017, 04:40:20 PM
Lloyd vs Roberton vs Macmillon
in that order.
Quote from: Fid on March 19, 2017, 02:54:36 PM
Jackson Ramsay v Zak Jones
neither, but Jones if i must.
Doch and Lloyd vs Adams and Howe
Taranto vs. Steele
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 19, 2017, 07:35:48 PM
Taranto vs. Steele
steele for points obviously id say
Shaw, Mitch Hibberd and 50k or Laird and Marchbank?
Oliver V Kelly
Option 2
Quote from: Torpedo10 on March 19, 2017, 07:45:26 PM
Shaw, Mitch Hibberd and 50k or Laird and Marchbank?
Josh Smuth vs Bob Murphy
and
Ryder vs Tom Philips plus 100k
Quote from: whynot102 on March 19, 2017, 07:54:50 PM
Josh Smuth vs Bob Murphy
and
Ryder vs Tom Philips plus 100k
Bob Murphy and Ryder
Zorko vs Bont guys??
I see pluses and minuses for both
Quote from: Roger Federer on March 19, 2017, 09:08:07 PM
Zorko vs Bont guys??
I see pluses and minuses for both
Bont is the guy who could hit 115 so you take him.
Quote from: Torpedo10 on March 19, 2017, 07:45:26 PM
Shaw, Mitch Hibberd and 50k or Laird and Marchbank?
Laird and Marchbank, due to JS of Marchbank
Adams v Doch
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 19, 2017, 09:38:19 PM
Adams v Doch
Doch may score a bit more, but that price gap can be used elsewhere.
How about:
Pendles and Steele v JPK and Roughhead
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 19, 2017, 09:38:19 PM
Adams v Doch
tough. i wont start doc as I see him as overpriced. Adams should be a 100+ average defender. Issue is how many games will he play.
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 17, 2017, 06:30:35 PM
which player should i get for my sc draft team in my fwd line?
Douglas, LeCras, Dsmith, Walters, shane edwards, billings, caleb daniel, greenwood or some other cheapish player who hopefully hasnt been selected
thanks
bump
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 19, 2017, 09:55:55 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 17, 2017, 06:30:35 PM
which player should i get for my sc draft team in my fwd line?
Douglas, LeCras, Dsmith, Walters, shane edwards, billings, caleb daniel, greenwood or some other cheapish player who hopefully hasnt been selected
thanks
bump
billings
Priddis vs Bont
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 19, 2017, 09:45:57 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 19, 2017, 09:38:19 PM
Adams v Doch
Doch may score a bit more, but that price gap can be used elsewhere.
How about:
Pendles and Steele v JPK and Roughhead
Tough one but I see Roughy as potentially a keeper, so I'd go JPK and Roughy
Positions aside, Macrae/Nroo v Goldstein
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 19, 2017, 07:08:10 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 19, 2017, 03:36:24 PMGoldy/Taranto 170 Witts/Caddy 180
quick question Ringo, you reckon that Goldy/Taranto will go 170, and Witts/Caddy 180??
i know Witts is getting a lot of love recently, but a 90 for him is a bit of a stretch isnt it??
Quote from: Ringo on March 19, 2017, 03:36:24 PM
Think Caddy can go 100/105 and Witts 75/80
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 19, 2017, 10:55:42 PM
Positions aside, Macrae/Nroo v Goldstein
Goldy mate.
Taranto + Steele vs 123k mid or fwd rookie + Higgins?
Quote from: Ringo on March 19, 2017, 11:16:27 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 19, 2017, 07:08:10 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 19, 2017, 03:36:24 PMGoldy/Taranto 170 Witts/Caddy 180
quick question Ringo, you reckon that Goldy/Taranto will go 170, and Witts/Caddy 180??
i know Witts is getting a lot of love recently, but a 90 for him is a bit of a stretch isnt it??
Quote from: Ringo on March 19, 2017, 03:36:24 PM
Think Caddy can go 100/105 and Witts 75/80
Goldy should go 110+ and Taranto around the 70 mark. Think Caddy more likely to avg around 95, and Witts 70ish. So Goldy and Taranto easily for me.
Quote from: Spite on March 20, 2017, 01:03:56 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 19, 2017, 10:55:42 PM
Positions aside, Macrae/Nroo v Goldstein
Goldy mate.
Taranto + Steele vs 123k mid or fwd rookie + Higgins?
Taranto + Steele imo
How about Bowes v Butler + 50k?
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 20, 2017, 11:52:04 AM
Quote from: Spite on March 20, 2017, 01:03:56 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 19, 2017, 10:55:42 PM
Positions aside, Macrae/Nroo v Goldstein
Goldy mate.
Taranto + Steele vs 123k mid or fwd rookie + Higgins?
Taranto + Steele imo
How about Bowes v Butler + 50k?
Butler atm
@above
Adams and Howe.
Sloane (M2) and Taranto (F5) with basically zero cash
Treloar (M2) and Turner (F5) with extra cash
JPK (M1) and Turner (F5) with not much cash
Quote from: SilverLion on March 20, 2017, 01:52:08 PM
@above
Adams and Howe.
Sloane (M2) and Taranto (F5) with basically zero cash
Treloar (M2) and Turner (F5) with extra cash
JPK (M1) and Turner (F5) with not much cash
Sloane racing time to be fit, and no Danger, no team, so 2 from those.
Two out of Rocky, Treloar and Bont?
Quote from: SilverLion on March 20, 2017, 01:52:08 PM
@above
Adams and Howe.
Sloane (M2) and Taranto (F5) with basically zero cash
Treloar (M2) and Turner (F5) with extra cash
JPK (M1) and Turner (F5) with not much cash
Treloar and Taranto if you can fit him in
Quote from: js19 on March 20, 2017, 03:10:12 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on March 20, 2017, 01:52:08 PM
@above
Adams and Howe.
Sloane (M2) and Taranto (F5) with basically zero cash
Treloar (M2) and Turner (F5) with extra cash
JPK (M1) and Turner (F5) with not much cash
Sloane racing time to be fit, and no Danger, no team, so 2 from those.
Two out of Rocky, Treloar and Bont?
Rocky and Treloar
Greene v Caddy?
makes my forward and back a little weak and all on field but
Thurlow Buddy Houston
v
Stewart JPK Bowes
Quote from: Holz on March 20, 2017, 05:17:57 PM
makes my forward and back a little weak and all on field but
Thurlow Buddy Houston
v
Stewart JPK Bowes
Im not aware of your current lineup, however id pick the second option
Tmitch + Sandilands vs Gawn + Swallow
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2017, 05:55:16 PM
Tmitch + Sandilands vs Gawn + Swallow
If Spencer is playing, Gawn's scores will suffer you would imagine. So Tmitch and Sandi
Quote from: B. on March 20, 2017, 05:01:20 PM
Greene v Caddy?
Caddy
Lloyd & Hurn (D2/D3) & Higgins (F3) + $34.4K vs. Adams/Laird (D2), Thurlow (D3), Buddy (F3) +$59K vs. Llloyd (D2), Thurlow (D3) Rocky
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston vs Franklin Green Taranto and Butler
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 07:45:11 PM
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston vs Franklin Green Taranto and Butler
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 20, 2017, 07:50:50 PM
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 07:45:11 PM
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston vs Franklin Green Taranto and Butler
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston
this
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 20, 2017, 07:41:27 PM
Quote from: B. on March 20, 2017, 05:01:20 PM
Greene v Caddy?
Caddy
Lloyd & Hurn (D2/D3) & Higgins (F3) + $34.4K vs. Adams/Laird (D2), Thurlow (D3), Buddy (F3) +$59K vs. Llloyd (D2), Thurlow (D3) Rocky
I prefer Laird + Thurlow + Buddy
Zac Jones vs Thurlow for D4?
neither, drop down to marchbank or if you have him down to a cheap rookie. alternative up to a low 400k mcmillan, touhy, etc
Thurlow (d3) + Taranto (f5) + Roughead (f4)
vs
McGovern (d3) + Taranto (m7) + Butler (f8)
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 09:20:29 PM
neither, drop down to marchbank or if you have him down to a cheap rookie. alternative up to a low 400k mcmillan, touhy, etc
I already have Marchbank and McMillan.
My backs are
Laird, Adams, McMillan, Thurlow, Marchbank, Hampton
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 20, 2017, 09:35:26 PM
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 09:20:29 PM
neither, drop down to marchbank or if you have him down to a cheap rookie. alternative up to a low 400k mcmillan, touhy, etc
I already have Marchbank and McMillan.
My backs are Laird, Adams, McMillan, Thurlow, Marchbank, Hampton
Would still drop down to a cheaper rookie. however if i had to have one would be jones
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 10:30:48 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 20, 2017, 09:35:26 PM
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 09:20:29 PM
neither, drop down to marchbank or if you have him down to a cheap rookie. alternative up to a low 400k mcmillan, touhy, etc
I already have Marchbank and McMillan.
My backs are Laird, Adams, McMillan, Thurlow, Marchbank, Hampton
Would still drop down to a cheaper rookie. however if i had to have one would be jones
trade one of thurlow or marchbank to a rookie
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 20, 2017, 07:41:27 PM
Quote from: B. on March 20, 2017, 05:01:20 PM
Greene v Caddy?
Caddy
Lloyd & Hurn (D2/D3) & Higgins (F3) + $34.4K vs. Adams/Laird (D2), Thurlow (D3), Buddy (F3) +$59K vs. Llloyd (D2), Thurlow (D3) Rocky
last option for me there
My conundrum: Tom Lynch + Taranto vs Wingard + Nankervis
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 20, 2017, 07:41:27 PM
Lloyd & Hurn (D2/D3) & Higgins (F3) + $34.4K vs. Adams/Laird (D2), Thurlow (D3), Buddy (F3) +$59K vs. Llloyd (D2), Thurlow (D3) Rocky
Second option but would rather...
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 20, 2017, 08:28:15 PM
Zac Jones vs Thurlow for D4?
Jones
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 07:45:11 PM
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston vs Franklin Green Taranto and Butler
Second option
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2017, 05:55:16 PM
Tmitch + Sandilands vs Gawn + Swallow
Tmitch + Sandi but I'd still try to squeeze Swallow in
Quote from: B. on March 20, 2017, 05:01:20 PM
Greene v Caddy?
For the love of god Greene
Quote from: My Chumps on March 21, 2017, 02:58:53 AM
My conundrum: Tom Lynch + Taranto vs Wingard + Nankervis
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 20, 2017, 07:41:27 PM
Lloyd & Hurn (D2/D3) & Higgins (F3) + $34.4K vs. Adams/Laird (D2), Thurlow (D3), Buddy (F3) +$59K vs. Llloyd (D2), Thurlow (D3) Rocky
Second option but would rather...Quote from: Judd Magic on March 20, 2017, 08:28:15 PM
Zac Jones vs Thurlow for D4?
Jones
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 07:45:11 PM
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston vs Franklin Green Taranto and Butler
Second option
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2017, 05:55:16 PM
Tmitch + Sandilands vs Gawn + Swallow
Tmitch + Sandi but I'd still try to squeeze Swallow in
Quote from: B. on March 20, 2017, 05:01:20 PM
Greene v Caddy?
For the love of god Greene
Lynch and Taranto will deliver more points IMO.
Florent or Kayne Turner?
Lynch vs Greene?
Quote from: Torpedo10 on March 21, 2017, 09:09:46 AM
Quote from: My Chumps on March 21, 2017, 02:58:53 AM
My conundrum: Tom Lynch + Taranto vs Wingard + Nankervis
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 20, 2017, 07:41:27 PM
Lloyd & Hurn (D2/D3) & Higgins (F3) + $34.4K vs. Adams/Laird (D2), Thurlow (D3), Buddy (F3) +$59K vs. Llloyd (D2), Thurlow (D3) Rocky
Second option but would rather...Quote from: Judd Magic on March 20, 2017, 08:28:15 PM
Zac Jones vs Thurlow for D4?
Jones
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 07:45:11 PM
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston vs Franklin Green Taranto and Butler
Second option
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 20, 2017, 05:55:16 PM
Tmitch + Sandilands vs Gawn + Swallow
Tmitch + Sandi but I'd still try to squeeze Swallow in
Quote from: B. on March 20, 2017, 05:01:20 PM
Greene v Caddy?
For the love of god Greene
Lynch and Taranto will deliver more points IMO.
Florent or Kayne Turner?
Florent!
And lynch to the above, even though he has rd 9 bye!
Swallow and Taranto v Nank and Barret(or similar rookie) keeping in mind that Nank provides cover for sandi.
From what I've read turner has the better job security. Turner could be a rollercoaster with scoring though. I'm considering Bowes over both atm but that's not settled
Team is nearly set but struggling with this one
Treloar vs Jelwood
Treloar gives me another VC option as I have Danger JPK Hanners Fyfe.
Jelwood the better bye and not a bad starting fixture.
Quote from: Mantis on March 21, 2017, 10:41:39 AM
From what I've read turner has the better job security. Turner could be a rollercoaster with scoring though. I'm considering Bowes over both atm but that's not settled
Team is nearly set but struggling with this one
Treloar vs Jelwood
Treloar gives me another VC option as I have Danger JPK Hanners Fyfe.
Jelwood the better bye and not a bad starting fixture.
you know the answer already.
Doc, Treloar, Taranto
Vs
Laird, Jaeger, Buddy
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 20, 2017, 07:50:50 PM
Quote from: crowls on March 20, 2017, 07:45:11 PM
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston vs Franklin Green Taranto and Butler
Caddy, Higgins, Nank, Houston
Franklin Nank Taranto Bowes/Turner + cash
Quote from: js19 on March 21, 2017, 12:08:49 PM
Doc, Treloar, Taranto
Vs
Laird, Jaeger, Buddy
1st option based on points
Roughead or Higgins ( have the cash to upgrade to Higgins but currently have roughy )
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2017, 12:46:29 PM
Quote from: js19 on March 21, 2017, 12:08:49 PM
Doc, Treloar, Taranto
Vs
Laird, Jaeger, Buddy
1st option based on points
option 2 easy.
Laird i can see matching Doch and Doch is over priced.
JOM is a much better pick then Taranto given he is only 100k more. He should beat him by 20+ points.
While I love Treloar i reckon Buddy can come within 20 easy.
Another juicy one -
T.Mitchell v J.Kelly
Had zero coin left to get in 2 playing rookies, I needed $78K.
After an hour i dropped T.Mitchell $565K and brought in J.Kelly $473K
Saving me $92K and being able the solid rookies in.
I also believe both Mitchell and Kelly are keepers and possibly make that Top10 mids.
Mitchell by a mile.
Kelly is not a keeper, he wont average 105+
Quote from: Mahogany on March 21, 2017, 01:10:33 PM
Roughead or Higgins ( have the cash to upgrade to Higgins but currently have roughy )
Tough one, probably Roughead but it could depend on what you spend the 60k on.
Pendles, TMitch, Howe
vs
Treloar, Sloane, Howe
vs
Treloar, TMitch, Adams
Gawn JPK Turner vs Grundy Trelor JOM
Quote from: uncleswagy on March 21, 2017, 03:26:00 PM
Gawn JPK Turner vs Grundy Trelor JOM
Grundy, Treloar, JOM
shaw jelwood v pendles adams
Quote from: TomK on March 21, 2017, 03:20:23 PM
Pendles, TMitch, Howe
vs
Treloar, Sloane, Howe
vs
Treloar, TMitch, Adams
Pendles, Tmitch, Howe
two keeps and rookie v two keeps and one potential keep who will make the same money and score more points.
Treloar v Pendlebury?
Do people think there'll be much of a difference between them? I can go Treloar and pocket the 40k or should i just go Pendlebury?
Quote from: john23132 on March 21, 2017, 05:09:23 PM
Treloar v Pendlebury?
Do people think there'll be much of a difference between them? I can go Treloar and pocket the 40k or should i just go Pendlebury?
I've gone for Pendles, he's SUPER consistent
How about:
Florent v Bowes v Turner (Pick 2 to start at F5, F6)
Turner and Florent out of those three
Quote from: Holz on March 21, 2017, 01:12:01 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2017, 12:46:29 PM
Quote from: js19 on March 21, 2017, 12:08:49 PM
Doc, Treloar, Taranto
Vs
Laird, Jaeger, Buddy
1st option based on points
option 2 easy.
Laird i can see matching Doch and Doch is over priced.
JOM is a much better pick then Taranto given he is only 100k more. He should beat him by 20+ points.
While I love Treloar i reckon Buddy can come within 20 easy.
Doc 105 + Treloar 110 + Taranto 75 = 290
Vs
Laird 100 + JOM 90 + Buddy 95 = 285
Close one but that was my logic.
Ward vs Shuey?
Getting a bit antsy as the season opener approaches.
Jelwood vs Titchell +$40k.
Have had Titch in the team for a week or 2 but starting to wonder if its the best option in a new team where he might get tagged. Although as the number 1 mid he should get plenty of opportunity to show his best.
Jelwood is everywhere when you watch a Geelong game and Danger gets most of the attention from the opposition.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2017, 09:23:15 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 21, 2017, 01:12:01 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2017, 12:46:29 PM
Quote from: js19 on March 21, 2017, 12:08:49 PM
Doc, Treloar, Taranto
Vs
Laird, Jaeger, Buddy
1st option based on points
option 2 easy.
Laird i can see matching Doch and Doch is over priced.
JOM is a much better pick then Taranto given he is only 100k more. He should beat him by 20+ points.
While I love Treloar i reckon Buddy can come within 20 easy.
Doc 105 + Treloar 110 + Taranto 75 = 290
Vs
Laird 100 + JOM 90 + Buddy 95 = 285
Close one but that was my logic.
Disagree as probablity of taranto 70+ is 50/50 at best. JOM floor is probably 90 and upside is 105.
Quote from: crowls on March 21, 2017, 10:24:26 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2017, 09:23:15 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 21, 2017, 01:12:01 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2017, 12:46:29 PM
Quote from: js19 on March 21, 2017, 12:08:49 PM
Doc, Treloar, Taranto
Vs
Laird, Jaeger, Buddy
1st option based on points
option 2 easy.
Laird i can see matching Doch and Doch is over priced.
JOM is a much better pick then Taranto given he is only 100k more. He should beat him by 20+ points.
While I love Treloar i reckon Buddy can come within 20 easy.
Doc 105 + Treloar 110 + Taranto 75 = 290
Vs
Laird 100 + JOM 90 + Buddy 95 = 285
Close one but that was my logic.
Disagree as probablity of taranto 70+ is 50/50 at best. JOM floor is probably 90 and upside is 105.
One can argue that Treloar's and Doc's upside is 115 and 110 respectively
McMillian, Tuohy, Bob Murphy or Roberton at D3
Quote from: whynot102 on March 21, 2017, 11:24:20 PM
McMillian, Tuohy, Bob Murphy or Roberton at D3
Too many good premium defensive options to be considering any of these but if I had to, probably Roberton.
Buddy, TMitch, Houston (F6)
vs
Ryder, Treloar, Turner (F6)
vs
Ryder, TMitch, WHE
Quote from: whynot102 on March 21, 2017, 11:24:20 PM
McMillian, Tuohy, Bob Murphy or Roberton at D3
I like Roberton and Macmillian. Would probably just give the edge to JMac
Steele and Greene
Vs
O'Meara and McRae
Quote from: TomK on March 21, 2017, 11:33:48 PM
Buddy, TMitch, Houston (F6)
vs
Ryder, Treloar, Turner (F6)
vs
Ryder, TMitch, WHE
Ryder, TMitch, WHE imo
Quote from: billnats on March 22, 2017, 12:00:18 AM
Steele and Greene
Vs
O'Meara and McRae
JOM and Macrae
Roughead vs Steele?
Quote from: tkringle on March 22, 2017, 09:14:08 AM
Roughead vs Steele?
Roughy for me.
Steele is unproven and is just being hyped through the roof without having any evidence to back up that he will be a premium. At the moment it is people just jumping on the he will play midfield.
While I agree that he is likely to improve his average at his price you really are hoping he turns into a premium, at best I see an 85 average, more likely going to be a 75-80 though.
Still struggling to get a final team I'm totally happy with :-\
1 - Lloyd/MacMillan + Swallow + Goldstein + Taranto
2 - Thurlow + Mid <$478k + Goldstein + Taranto
3 - Thurlow + Macrae + Goldstein + Florent
4 - Howe + Selwood + Witts + Taranto
thurlow j kelly goldy taranto
marchbank or taranto
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 22, 2017, 11:55:40 AM
Still struggling to get a final team I'm totally happy with :-\
1 - Lloyd/MacMillan + Swallow + Goldstein + Taranto
2 - Thurlow + Mid <$478k + Goldstein + Taranto
3 - Thurlow + Macrae + Goldstein + Florent
4 - Howe + Selwood + Witts + Taranto
Easy decision for mine - option 1
Shaw v Docherty as my D1?
Quote from: ants on March 22, 2017, 01:06:11 PM
marchbank or taranto
Marchbank for me - stronger job security
Quote from: CunningStunt on March 22, 2017, 01:28:28 PM
Shaw v Docherty as my D1?
Shaw for me, longer history of premium scores. Can't go wrong with either really though and Docherty has a better bye when used with Laird and Adams
Laird/Rance + Taranto vs. Thurlow + JKelly
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 22, 2017, 01:39:31 PM
Laird/Rance + Taranto vs. Thurlow + JKelly
Laird and Taranto by a mile
have to start one of Eddy/Butler/Houston - leaning towards eddy, who would you pick?
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 22, 2017, 01:49:09 PM
have to start one of Eddy/Butler/Houston - leaning towards eddy, who would you pick?
Eddy will only score well when kicking a few goals which I can't see him doing against the Swans, especially considering Sydney's weather lately. For these reasons I would probably also lean to Butler over Houston.
Roughy, Neale and Marchbank or Buddy, Titch and EVW/Hibberd
Quote from: JMAN23 on March 22, 2017, 04:01:56 PM
Roughy, Neale and Marchbank or Buddy, Titch and EVW/Hibberd
thats a toss of the coin 90 110 75 vs 100 110 65
Jake Lloyd or Howe?
Grundy at R1 with Nank at F3 or Riewoldt at F1 with Nank at R1
(Sandy second ruck)
Goldy/Taranto or Witts/Selwood
Quote from: rocky38 on March 22, 2017, 06:25:28 PM
Grundy at R1 with Nank at F3 or Riewoldt at F1 with Nank at R1
(Sandy second ruck)
Riewoldt option
Quote from: whynot102 on March 22, 2017, 06:32:24 PM
Goldy/Taranto or Witts/Selwood
Witts & Selwood (but I prefer Treloar given Selwood plays a stack of away games to start the year).
one last one that has been frying my brain - nervous about the fwd rooks but also uncertain about the rance v Lloyd part..
Rance and Buttler Vs Lloyd and Taranto
* More of a SC Draft comparison but….
James Kelly Vs Andrew Mackie.
Unsure if Kelly will score well with everyone else back in Ess team & unsure how well Mackie will do.
Already have Treloar maybe Hanners
Quote from: Bully on March 22, 2017, 06:39:11 PM
Quote from: whynot102 on March 22, 2017, 06:32:24 PM
Goldy/Taranto or Witts/Selwood
Witts & Selwood (but I prefer Treloar given Selwood plays a stack of away games to start the year).
Quote from: madskill55 on March 22, 2017, 06:46:24 PM
* More of a SC Draft comparison but….
James Kelly Vs Andrew Mackie.
Unsure if Kelly will score well with everyone else back in Ess team & unsure how well Mackie will do.
Enright being retired, whose the general down back now?
Quote from: Bones Bombers on March 21, 2017, 10:22:53 PM
Getting a bit antsy as the season opener approaches.
Jelwood vs Titchell +$40k.
Have had Titch in the team for a week or 2 but starting to wonder if its the best option in a new team where he might get tagged. Although as the number 1 mid he should get plenty of opportunity to show his best.
Jelwood is everywhere when you watch a Geelong game and Danger gets most of the attention from the opposition.
Not sure if anyone saw this so I'll ask again. Also add Treloar into the mix.
Quote from: Bones Bombers on March 22, 2017, 06:57:27 PM
Quote from: Bones Bombers on March 21, 2017, 10:22:53 PM
Getting a bit antsy as the season opener approaches.
Jelwood vs Titchell +$40k.
Have had Titch in the team for a week or 2 but starting to wonder if its the best option in a new team where he might get tagged. Although as the number 1 mid he should get plenty of opportunity to show his best.
Jelwood is everywhere when you watch a Geelong game and Danger gets most of the attention from the opposition.
Not sure if anyone saw this so I'll ask again. Also add Treloar into the mix.
Jelwood's gone 110+ 7 of the last 8 years, the other 2 haven't reached that milestone. But still a tough call, go with the gut.
Quote from: frenzy on March 22, 2017, 07:32:17 PM
Quote from: Bones Bombers on March 22, 2017, 06:57:27 PM
Quote from: Bones Bombers on March 21, 2017, 10:22:53 PM
Getting a bit antsy as the season opener approaches.
Jelwood vs Titchell +$40k.
Have had Titch in the team for a week or 2 but starting to wonder if its the best option in a new team where he might get tagged. Although as the number 1 mid he should get plenty of opportunity to show his best.
Jelwood is everywhere when you watch a Geelong game and Danger gets most of the attention from the opposition.
Not sure if anyone saw this so I'll ask again. Also add Treloar into the mix.
Jelwood's gone 110+ 7 of the last 8 years, the other 2 haven't reached that milestone. But still a tough call, go with the gut.
Cheers for the input Frenzy!
Pendles Higgins Houston VS. Jelwood Roughy WHE
Jom Higgins Buddy v Beams Steele Caddy
marchbank(d4), jmac/lloyd/touhey(d3) vs Simpson (d1) 123k rookie? most likely one of the roos. Already got shaw, laird, hampton, otten, stewart and guthrie
Quote from: uncleswagy on March 22, 2017, 09:00:15 PM
Jom Higgins Buddy v Beams Steele Caddy
Beams is non negotiable so option 2
SPS OR TARANTO
Doc/Howe V Adams/Rance?
Butler Vs Houston
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 22, 2017, 09:35:59 PM
Butler Vs Houston
If Houston plays I'd lean towards Houston. I think it will be a flip of a coin but Houston should be in the 22 for a month if he is named.
Hanners vs Selwood
Marchbank + Cripps
OR
T. Stewart + Rockliff + 100K.
Really like Rocky a lot but can't get him in unless I get rid of Marchbank. Is Stewart really that far beneath Marchbank in terms of scoring potential? 100K would also be pretty nice to have.
Caddy or T.Lynch (suns)
Keeping in mind i already have Nank and Butler in my forwards (probaly why i havent picked Caddy yet)
Dan Butler v Jarrod Pickett?
Quote from: Hawka on March 22, 2017, 10:15:49 PM
Caddy or T.Lynch (suns)
Keeping in mind i already have Nank and Butler in my forwards (probaly why i havent picked Caddy yet)
Lynch! He's in my team
Quote from: Cookie Monster on March 22, 2017, 10:17:56 PM
Dan Butler v Jarrod Pickett?
Pickett! He's in there to kick goals!
Now.... K.Simpson + Bont v Docherty + Titch?
Butler v Houston?
Quote from: mzunguman on March 22, 2017, 10:39:42 PM
Quote from: Hawka on March 22, 2017, 10:15:49 PM
Caddy or T.Lynch (suns)
Keeping in mind i already have Nank and Butler in my forwards (probaly why i havent picked Caddy yet)
Lynch! He's in my team
Quote from: Cookie Monster on March 22, 2017, 10:17:56 PM
Dan Butler v Jarrod Pickett?
Pickett! He's in there to kick goals!
Now.... K.Simpson + Bont v Docherty + Titch?
Tough one mate, just swaying towards Doc and Titch
marchbank(d4), jmac/lloyd/touhey(d3) vs Simpson (d1) 123k rookie? most likely one of the roos. Already got shaw, laird, hampton, otten, stewart and guthrie
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 22, 2017, 11:10:20 PM
Butler v Houston?
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 22, 2017, 09:56:40 PM
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 22, 2017, 09:35:59 PM
Butler Vs Houston
If Houston plays I'd lean towards Houston. I think it will be a flip of a coin but Houston should be in the 22 for a month if he is named.
Hanners vs Selwood
Quote from: jonahfalcond on March 22, 2017, 09:57:19 PM
Marchbank + Cripps
OR
T. Stewart + Rockliff + 100K.
Really like Rocky a lot but can't get him in unless I get rid of Marchbank. Is Stewart really that far beneath Marchbank in terms of scoring potential? 100K would also be pretty nice to have.
I did some reading on some stats and Cripps had a ridiculous year last year and still only averaged 107. He can obviously improve with natural progression but with an interrupted pre-season he may not have had the chance to work on those aspects of his game. Could you somehow go Rocky and Marchbank?
Quote from: mzunguman on March 22, 2017, 10:39:42 PM
Now.... K.Simpson + Bont v Docherty + Titch?
Doc and Mitchell.
Quote from: JMAN23 on March 22, 2017, 11:13:22 PM
marchbank(d4), jmac/lloyd/touhey(d3) vs Simpson (d1) 123k rookie? most likely one of the roos. Already got shaw, laird, hampton, otten, stewart and guthrie
I don't trust the Roos so I would probably take the punt on Marchbank and one of the other guys. However I'm not a sold on them being top 6ish.
Quote from: JMAN23 on March 22, 2017, 11:13:22 PM
marchbank(d4), jmac/lloyd/touhey(d3) vs Simpson (d1) 123k rookie? most likely one of the roos. Already got shaw, laird, hampton, otten, stewart and guthrie
Lloyd/Jmac and Marchbank. Think Marchbank is a must
For D3 and F6
Laird/Parfitt vs Lloyd/Florent (or Taranto)?
Pendles Simmo Steele v Treloar Doch Roughy
I want to start Pendles so bad but I feel option 2 is much stronger and safer
Roughy Vs Ryder Vs Greene
Quote from: Bubbles on March 22, 2017, 11:43:32 PM
Pendles Simmo Steele v Treloar Doch Roughy
I want to start Pendles so bad but I feel option 2 is much stronger and safer
You're spot on...option 2 is much stronger but how can you go passed pendlebury?
He's literally the first player picked in my team every year and he doesn't leave my side ONCE...never!
Last 5 years...
118
116
124
126
124
The guy was made for SC, do whatever you can to get him in mate.
Quote from: piesfan1989 on March 22, 2017, 11:54:01 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 22, 2017, 11:43:32 PM
Pendles Simmo Steele v Treloar Doch Roughy
I want to start Pendles so bad but I feel option 2 is much stronger and safer
You're spot on...option 2 is much stronger but how can you go passed pendlebury?
He's literally the first player picked in my team every year and he doesn't leave my side ONCE...never!
Last 5 years...
118
116
124
126
124
The guy was made for SC, do whatever you can to get him in mate.
Your right....
Buddy + Houston (F6)
vs
Ryder + WHE
Quote from: TomK on March 23, 2017, 12:30:48 AM
Buddy + Houston (F6)
vs
Ryder + WHE
You can predict buddy + houston to output 100 + 60 points +/- not very many points...
You can predict ryder + WHE to output 90+70 points +/- like 10 points
More risk in option 2 but I think it has more upside.
Higgins V Ryder
Quote from: GVSKiwi on March 23, 2017, 12:50:23 AM
Higgins V Ryder
If you need ruck cover then Ryder, otherwise Higgins.
Pendles and Bont vs Hanners and Treloar
Also what order would you have them in?
Quote from: GoSaints3 on March 23, 2017, 03:27:33 AM
Quote from: GVSKiwi on March 23, 2017, 12:50:23 AM
Higgins V Ryder
If you need ruck cover then Ryder, otherwise Higgins.
Pendles and Bont vs Hanners and Treloar
Also what order would you have them in?
I'd pick Higgins. Should definitely get more mid time, and his bye is a bonus. I'd go Pendles and Bont. Pendles>Treloar>Hanners>Bont.
Witts + Tom Mitchell vs SPS + Goldstein
Higgins & Barrett vs
Rough & SPS
Taranto v Turner v SPS
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 23, 2017, 09:51:29 AM
Taranto v Turner v SPS
Taranto but SPS if you want JS.
Nankervis + T.Lynch vs Gawn + Taranto
Quote from: Maca24 on March 23, 2017, 10:18:24 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 23, 2017, 09:51:29 AM
Taranto v Turner v SPS
Taranto but SPS if you want JS.
Nankervis + T.Lynch vs Gawn + Taranto
Nank + Lynch will score more imo
Florent vs. Turner
Can only pick one...
Quote from: SilverLion on March 23, 2017, 10:32:40 AM
Florent vs. Turner
Can only pick one...
I've gone for Florent but I'm not too sure.
Currently have Taranto + Florent as my playing forward rookies.
Swallow (M8) + Cameron (F6) (Would play Butler off the bench)
or
Sam Petrevski (M8) + Taranto (F6)
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 23, 2017, 11:47:06 AM
Swallow (M8) + Cameron (F6) (Would play Butler off the bench)
or
Sam Petrevski (M8) + Taranto (F6)
Option 2 I reckon...
Greene V Macrae V Caddy?
Macrae>Caddy>Greene
Is Sloane going to get up for round one? Can't seem to find much on it.
If he does..... Treloar+Swallow vs Sloane + O'Meara
Shaw and J.Loyd
or
Laird and Adams
(currently have Shaw and Lloyd to diversify....
otherwise: Laird + Hampton + Otten & Adams + Pendles + Treloar + WHE)
Roughy Vs Ryder Vs Greene
WHE + cash vs Steele (F5)
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 23, 2017, 01:23:15 PM
WHE + cash vs Steele (F5)
Depends on what the cash is used on
Lance Franklin v Nick Riewoldt
WHE/Taranto + Adams Vs Thurlow + Caddy/Buddy/Greene
Goldy/Taranto/WHE vs Witts/Higgins/Roughead
Quote from: tkringle on March 23, 2017, 01:49:55 PM
Goldy/Taranto/WHE vs Witts/Higgins/Roughead
Goldy Roughy cheap rookie and find cash.
This may seem like a stupid question but if I were to bring in Pendles, who would it be for....? $143.3 bank.
M1 Danger. M2 Hanners. M3 Jelwood. M4 Treloar. M5 Fyfe. M6 Titchell. M7 SPS. M8 SPP.
Quote from: Woppa15 on March 23, 2017, 02:27:39 PM
This may seem like a stupid question but if I were to bring in Pendles, who would it be for....? $143.3 bank.
M1 Danger. M2 Hanners. M3 Jelwood. M4 Treloar. M5 Fyfe. M6 Titchell. M7 SPS. M8 SPP.
Selwood.
He performs so much better after about round 8/9 and will be cheaper then.
Adams vs Simmo
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 23, 2017, 02:44:58 PM
Adams vs Simmo
Simmo, more durable
Buddy, Treloar, Rance
vs
Ryder, Pendles, Docherty
Lloyd vs Mills
caddy & taranto
macrae & florent
Quote from: tkringle on March 23, 2017, 03:38:49 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 23, 2017, 03:07:11 PM
Lloyd vs Mills
Lloyd
Taranto vs Florent?
Taranto
Quote from: cotch9 on March 23, 2017, 03:52:26 PM
caddy & taranto
macrae & florent
Tough one, prefer Macrae to Caddy but prefer Taranto to Florent. Lean towards Caddy and Taranto, probably 50/50 though.
Docherty vs Simpson
Playing F6
Pickett Vs Butler
Quote from: RiOtChEsS on March 23, 2017, 04:27:43 PM
Playing F6
Pickett Vs Butler
Butler.
Rance V Adams
already have treloar and pendles
Quote from: GVSKiwi on March 23, 2017, 04:46:24 PM
Quote from: RiOtChEsS on March 23, 2017, 04:27:43 PM
Playing F6
Pickett Vs Butler
Butler.
Rance V Adams
already have treloar and pendles
Adams should score better, but an injury risk. Up to you as to whether you want to take that risk or not, personally I'd go Rance :)
Pendles + 484k Forward
vs
Treloar + Buddy
Quote from: TomK on March 23, 2017, 04:51:38 PM
Pendles + 484k Forward
vs
Treloar + Buddy
I prefer Treloar + Buddy
Quote from: TomK on March 23, 2017, 02:53:47 PM
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 23, 2017, 02:44:58 PM
Adams vs Simmo
Simmo, more durable
Buddy, Treloar, Rance
vs
Ryder, Pendles, Docherty
I prefer Buddy to Ryder but the other two guys in option 2 over Treloar and Rance.
Quote from: RiOtChEsS on March 23, 2017, 04:56:23 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 23, 2017, 04:51:38 PM
Pendles + 484k Forward
vs
Treloar + Buddy
I prefer Treloar + Buddy
Cheers mate, that's what I have at the moment, just don't like no Pendles :-\
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 23, 2017, 04:57:20 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 23, 2017, 02:53:47 PM
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 23, 2017, 02:44:58 PM
Adams vs Simmo
Simmo, more durable
Buddy, Treloar, Rance
vs
Ryder, Pendles, Docherty
I prefer Buddy to Ryder but the other two guys in option 2 over Treloar and Rance.
My thoughts exactly but I've decided to keep Rance to save cash to avoid having to go all the way down to Ryder. My dream is to get it as Buddy, Pendles, Rance. Just need to find 30K somewhere else in my team to make it happen.
Tmac vs Howe?
Bringing in another premo defender, used to have Tmac so originally brought him in, but thinking Howe may be a better option. Already have Shaw and Laird, 545k-ish to spend
Quote from: GoLions on March 23, 2017, 05:04:28 PM
Tmac vs Howe?
Bringing in another premo defender, used to have Tmac so originally brought him in, but thinking Howe may be a better option. Already have Shaw and Laird, 545k-ish to spend
Howe easy
Witts v Taranto
Quote from: _wato on March 23, 2017, 05:13:55 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 23, 2017, 05:04:28 PM
Tmac vs Howe?
Bringing in another premo defender, used to have Tmac so originally brought him in, but thinking Howe may be a better option. Already have Shaw and Laird, 545k-ish to spend
Howe easy
Witts v Taranto
Haha the age old question. I have both at the moment ;) I think it depends on who you will Ruck if you don't pick Witts, and whether you're comfortable with them. I'm not comfortable with any of the premo rucks at the moments, so going with Witts.
Thurlow + Hannebery + Roughead vs Simpson/Docherty + Swallow + Higgins
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 23, 2017, 05:25:50 PM
Quote from: _wato on March 23, 2017, 05:13:55 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 23, 2017, 05:04:28 PM
Tmac vs Howe?
Bringing in another premo defender, used to have Tmac so originally brought him in, but thinking Howe may be a better option. Already have Shaw and Laird, 545k-ish to spend
Howe easy
Witts v Taranto
Haha the age old question. I have both at the moment ;) I think it depends on who you will Ruck if you don't pick Witts, and whether you're comfortable with them. I'm not comfortable with any of the premo rucks at the moments, so going with Witts.
Thurlow + Hannebery + Roughead vs Simpson/Docherty + Swallow + Higgins
Option #2 m'lord
Gunston v Lynch v Franklin v Caddy?
Toby Greene vs Jack Macrae vs Caddy
Patty Ryder vs Chad Wingard
Simpson vs Shaw
Quote from: B. on March 23, 2017, 05:31:37 PM
Gunston v Lynch v Franklin v Caddy?
Caddy allthough my thinking is more Macrae or Greene
Quote from: B. on March 23, 2017, 05:31:37 PM
Gunston v Lynch v Franklin v Caddy?
Buddy (if Lynch didn't have the Rd.9 bye I would've said him.
Quote from: miamis_finest on March 23, 2017, 05:35:30 PM
Toby Greene vs Jack Macrae vs Caddy
Patty Ryder vs Chad Wingard
Simpson vs Shaw
Macrae
Ryder
Toss a coin.......came up as Shaw
Nank F3 & Strnadica R3
VS
Roughead F3 & Witts R3
With Goldy R1 Sandy R2
WHE vs Florent
Gawn & swallow V Goldy O'meara?
Otten v Vickers-willis
Thanks
Quote from: no eye deer on March 23, 2017, 11:54:35 AM
Macrae>Caddy>Greene
Is Sloane going to get up for round one? Can't seem to find much on it.
If he does..... Treloar+Swallow vs Sloane + O'Meara
Sloane and O'Meara
Buddy (F3) and Houston (F6) vs Wingard (F3) and SPS (M8) ?
Quote from: Carn on March 23, 2017, 07:52:03 PM
Gawn & swallow V Goldy O'meara?
Gawn and Swallow by quite a margin.
Gawn + 2 rookie priced vs Sandi, Roughy and Swallow.
Goldy and Tmac vs Stefan and Docherty? With Preuss named, tempted to make the switch...
Quote from: GoLions on March 23, 2017, 08:03:38 PM
Goldy and Tmac vs Stefan and Docherty? With Preuss named, tempted to make the switch...
I like Stef and Dochers
Stewart vs Houston vs Joel Smith for D8?
Quote from: TomK on March 23, 2017, 08:04:51 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 23, 2017, 08:03:38 PM
Goldy and Tmac vs Stefan and Docherty? With Preuss named, tempted to make the switch...
I like Stef and Dochers
^^ get dat Dochers
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2017, 08:06:32 PM
Stewart vs Houston vs Joel Smith for D8?
Houston is a fwd, so...Smith I guess (don't tell Purps)
Quote from: batt on March 23, 2017, 08:06:56 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 23, 2017, 08:04:51 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 23, 2017, 08:03:38 PM
Goldy and Tmac vs Stefan and Docherty? With Preuss named, tempted to make the switch...
I like Stef and Dochers
^^ get dat Dochers
Yeah reckon I'll do it :-X
Cheers fellas 8)
Treloar + Schoenmakers (on field)
v
GHS + Franklin
Quote from: Holz on March 23, 2017, 08:10:15 PM
Treloar + Schoenmakers (on field)
v
GHS + Franklin
I endorse any option which gets Schoey off field.
GHS + Franklin (I think I need to look a little close at GHS)
Gawn + Swallow v Neale + Ryder ?
Hanners vs Bont?
D. Swallow & Treloar
vs
Horlin-Smith & Pendlebury
Quote from: billnats on March 24, 2017, 01:26:52 AM
D. Swallow, Goldstein & Treloar
vs
D. Swallow, Gawn & Mitchell
vs
Horlin-Smith, Goldstein & Pendlebury
Swallow, Gawn and Mitchell
Gawn vs Martin?
Quote from: GoSaints3 on March 24, 2017, 01:27:36 AM
Quote from: billnats on March 24, 2017, 01:26:52 AM
D. Swallow, Goldstein & Treloar
vs
D. Swallow, Gawn & Mitchell
vs
Horlin-Smith, Goldstein & Pendlebury
Swallow, Gawn and Mitchell
Gawn vs Martin?
I'd go Martin. Too many unknowns with Gawn at that price. Reckon worst case he stays the same, best case, you pick him up 100k cheaper.
Selwood, Taranto, Bowes on field
vs
GHS, Buddy, Steele
Quote from: js19 on March 24, 2017, 03:44:50 AM
Quote from: GoSaints3 on March 24, 2017, 01:27:36 AM
Quote from: billnats on March 24, 2017, 01:26:52 AM
D. Swallow, Goldstein & Treloar
vs
D. Swallow, Gawn & Mitchell
vs
Horlin-Smith, Goldstein & Pendlebury
Swallow, Gawn and Mitchell
Gawn vs Martin?
I'd go Martin. Too many unknowns with Gawn at that price. Reckon worst case he stays the same, best case, you pick him up 100k cheaper.
Selwood, Taranto, Bowes on field
vs
GHS, Buddy, Steele
Option 2
Bowes + Hanners
Vs
Witts + Treloar
Howe v Macmillan
Turner v Simpkin v Florent v Taranto (pick 2)
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 24, 2017, 09:21:55 AM
Turner v Simpkin v Florent v Taranto (pick 2)
Florent
Bowes + Hanners vs Witts + Treloar
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 24, 2017, 09:21:55 AM
Turner v Simpkin v Florent v Taranto (pick 2)
Against high priced rookies. simkin and florent
Ryder v Stef ?
Quote from: shaker on March 24, 2017, 09:46:52 AM
Ryder v Stef ?
Think Stef has a higher cieling than Ryder.
Quote from: shaker on March 24, 2017, 09:46:52 AM
Ryder v Stef ?
Honestly wouldn't touch either.
If I had to pick one, then stef.
Treloar v JPK v Hannebery
Rank in order.
Florent v Simpkin v Bowes v WHE rank them in order
Can't decided which 3 to start.... currently have WHE, Bowes and Simpkin
Quote from: Bubbles on March 24, 2017, 10:22:01 AM
Florent v Simpkin v Bowes v WHE rank them in order
WHE > Florent > Simpkin > Bowes
Otten vs Houston vs WHE? (Yes I know Otten is a defender :P)
Quote from: Jay on March 24, 2017, 11:08:21 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 24, 2017, 10:22:01 AM
Florent v Simpkin v Bowes v WHE rank them in order
WHE > Florent > Simpkin > Bowes
Otten vs Houston vs WHE? (Yes I know Otten is a defender :P )
Lot of money for fwd rookies. Why? Butler has already shown you can get cash generation from cheap rookies. Even if you missed his points last night you can corrective trade one of the expensive buggers in your list to butler to get his cash rise.
Grundy and Roughy vs Gawn and WHE
Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:10:50 AM
Quote from: Jay on March 24, 2017, 11:08:21 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 24, 2017, 10:22:01 AM
Florent v Simpkin v Bowes v WHE rank them in order
WHE > Florent > Simpkin > Bowes
Otten vs Houston vs WHE? (Yes I know Otten is a defender :P )
Lot of money for fwd rookies. Why? Butler has already shown you can get cash generation from cheap rookies. Even if you missed his points last night you can corrective trade one of the expensive buggers in your list to butler to get his cash rise.
If butler scores crap next week I don't even think I will make a corrective trade to get him... name me three more rookies 130k or less in the forward line with good JS
Macrae vs Toby Greene?
Last decision time
Quote from: Bubbles on March 24, 2017, 10:22:01 AM
Florent v Simpkin v Bowes v WHE rank them in order
Can't decided which 3 to start.... currently have WHE, Bowes and Simpkin
Bowes>WHE>Florent>Simpkin
Quote from: Bubbles on March 24, 2017, 11:29:41 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 24, 2017, 11:10:50 AM
Quote from: Jay on March 24, 2017, 11:08:21 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 24, 2017, 10:22:01 AM
Florent v Simpkin v Bowes v WHE rank them in order
WHE > Florent > Simpkin > Bowes
Otten vs Houston vs WHE? (Yes I know Otten is a defender :P )
Lot of money for fwd rookies. Why? Butler has already shown you can get cash generation from cheap rookies. Even if you missed his points last night you can corrective trade one of the expensive buggers in your list to butler to get his cash rise.
If butler scores crap next week I don't even think I will make a corrective trade to get him... name me three more rookies 130k or less in the forward line with good JS
Difference is the mid price rookies need to average 10+ points more than the cheaper rookies. Is they JS better? Probably not. I like Florent f5 but not sure his JS is worth it. I have simpkin at the moment and questioning that decision as well. If there JS is not better the likelihood is they will not average more than cheaper rookies. ATM I have houston, eddy, picket fwd, and parfit in mids. Then there is butler. As stated if he duds next week people will need to decide on if to start him. However he will get a good first price rise and be capable of an early trade.
Bowes + Hanners vs Witts + Treloar
goldy/strndica vs witts/steele
witts and 200K vs ryder
Quote from: Maca24 on March 24, 2017, 12:22:47 PM
Bowes + Hanners vs Witts + Treloar
Treloar & Witts. Think Hanners and Treloar are the same, and then would rather Witts for his ruck coverage.
JPK & Florent vs. Sloane & WHE
Quote from: Jay on March 24, 2017, 12:42:11 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on March 24, 2017, 12:22:47 PM
Bowes + Hanners vs Witts + Treloar
Treloar & Witts. Think Hanners and Treloar are the same, and then would rather Witts for his ruck coverage.
JPK & Florent vs. Sloane & WHE
Thanks :)
JPK and Florent, Sloane is underdone and I prefer Florent over WHE.
Treloar + Ben Long (Bank Butlers 98 and loop Eddy/Butler until Long comes in) v Titchell + Simpkin
Quote from: Torpedo10 on March 24, 2017, 01:04:03 PM
Treloar + Ben Long (Bank Butlers 98 and loop Eddy/Butler until Long comes in) v Titchell + Simpkin
Option 2, you are assuming Ben Long comes in at all...
Alrighty, made a few adjustments and need help with the final piece. Best defender under 362K.
These are the options I'm looking at: Hurley, Carlisle, Z.Jones, Ramsay or Thurlow?
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 24, 2017, 01:35:13 PM
Alrighty, made a few adjustments and need help with the final piece. Best defender under 362K.
These are the options I'm looking at: Hurley, Carlisle, Z.Jones, Ramsay or Thurlow?
Hurley is 464k
Jones or Thurlow for me
Quote from: Gigantor on March 24, 2017, 01:37:16 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 24, 2017, 01:35:13 PM
Alrighty, made a few adjustments and need help with the final piece. Best defender under 362K.
These are the options I'm looking at: Hurley, Carlisle, Z.Jones, Ramsay or Thurlow?
Hurley is 464k
Jones or Thurlow for me
Lol, I read Hurley instead of Hartley! Thank flower for that!
Was on Thurlow all pre season, I have this gut feeling that he got injured that last JLT and will miss this week...think I'll roll with Jones and if I need to correct the so be it.
Quote from: MontyJnr on March 24, 2017, 10:17:34 AM
Treloar v JPK v Hannebery
Rank in order.
JPK, Treloar, Hanners but bot really a lot of difference between them.
McCarthy vs Taranto
Worried about Taranto's security with Coniglio and Lids to come inz
Quote from: AlexIsOnFire on March 24, 2017, 03:10:53 PM
McCarthy vs Taranto
Worried about Taranto's security with Coniglio and Lids to come inz
Taranto
Bont Vs Hanners Vs JPK
really wanna go the bont!
Trealor & Parker vs Hanners/JPK & Jack Steven?
Quote from: lukebomber on March 24, 2017, 03:34:53 PM
Trealor & Parker vs Hanners/JPK & Jack Steven?
Treloar & Parker
Is it worth forking out the 20k for some meagre, uncertain ruck cover?
Selwood + Strnadica vs TMitchell + Preuss
No Nank to swap at R3 so the F/R is pretty useless atm.
Quote from: AlexIsOnFire on March 24, 2017, 03:10:53 PM
McCarthy vs Taranto
Worried about Taranto's security with Coniglio and Lids to come inz
Tossing this up myself. I really like McCarthy and want to fit him in, but I reckon you've gotta go Taranto. McCarthy is probably copping the #1 defender each week for the Dockers after a year out of footy. Tough ask. If Taranto plays well enough he won't get dropped for Lids/Conigs.
Quote from: smashbox on March 24, 2017, 03:26:08 PM
Bont Vs Hanners Vs JPK
really wanna go the bont!
JPK JPK JPK, contested pig with no Tom Mitchell to get in his way anymore.
Quote from: lukebomber on March 24, 2017, 03:34:53 PM
Trealor & Parker vs Hanners/JPK & Jack Steven?
Trealor and Parker. Jack Steven is a very frustrating player in SC b/c he butchers it so often. Try to scrounge up the cash to turn Parker into JPK though!
Pendles/Higgins or Titch/Macrae??
Already have Adams and Treloar that's my worry with Pendles
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 24, 2017, 04:16:48 PM
Pendles/Higgins or Titch/Macrae??
Already have Adams and Treloar that's my worry with Pendles
I currently have Lycnh too. I just gany bring myself to get rid of him instead of Macrae
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 24, 2017, 04:16:48 PM
Pendles/Higgins or Titch/Macrae??
Already have Adams and Treloar that's my worry with Pendles
Pendles and Higgins for me, but close
Gawn, Titch and Florent
Vs
Pendles, Buddy and Witts
Quote from: My Chumps on March 24, 2017, 04:04:27 PM
Is it worth forking out the 20k for some meagre, uncertain ruck cover?
Selwood + Strnadica vs TMitchell + Preuss
No Nank to swap at R3 so the F/R is pretty useless atm.
Also:
Houston vs Eddy?
Quote from: My Chumps on March 24, 2017, 04:41:27 PM
Quote from: My Chumps on March 24, 2017, 04:04:27 PM
Is it worth forking out the 20k for some meagre, uncertain ruck cover?
Selwood + Strnadica vs TMitchell + Preuss
No Nank to swap at R3 so the F/R is pretty useless atm.
Also:
Houston vs Eddy?
I wouldn't bother with Preuss
Eddy
Treloar + Taranto
+
Pendles + Bowes/Simpkin/Florent
Keep in mind Taranto/Bowes/Simpkin/Florent would be F5.
Quote from: smashbox on March 24, 2017, 03:26:08 PM
Bont Vs Hanners Vs JPK
really wanna go the bont!
bont is a star... But. Go jog he has the runs on the board
Vince, Pendles, Taranto (F5) & 64k vs Lloyd, Rocky, Steele (F5)
Quote from: js19 on March 24, 2017, 04:38:51 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 24, 2017, 04:16:48 PM
Pendles/Higgins or Titch/Macrae??
Already have Adams and Treloar that's my worry with Pendles
Pendles and Higgins for me, but close
Gawn, Titch and Florent
Vs
Pendles, Buddy and Witts
Bump
Quote from: js19 on March 24, 2017, 05:50:51 PM
Quote from: js19 on March 24, 2017, 04:38:51 PM
Quote from: hawkers65 on March 24, 2017, 04:16:48 PM
Pendles/Higgins or Titch/Macrae??
Already have Adams and Treloar that's my worry with Pendles
Pendles and Higgins for me, but close
Gawn, Titch and Florent
Vs
Pendles, Buddy and Witts
Bump
Pendles Buddy and Witts for me
Quote from: tommy10 on March 24, 2017, 05:50:28 PM
Vince, Pendles, Taranto (F5) & 64k vs Lloyd, Rocky, Steele (F5)
Vince, Pendles, Taranto but I'd personally prefer someone other than Vince with the 64k, such as Howe, Laird, or Adams if you don't have them. Up to you of course though.
Quote from: js19 on March 24, 2017, 05:50:51 PM
Gawn, Titch and Florent
Vs
Pendles, Buddy and Witts
Pendles, Buddy, and Witts
Treloar + JPK vs. Pendles + Bont
Quote from: BLBBLB on March 24, 2017, 05:57:27 PM
Treloar + JPK vs. Pendles + Bont
Flip a coin haha? I honestly don't think I can split it.
Pendles > JPK/Treloar > Bont
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 04:47:44 PM
Treloar + Taranto
+
Pendles + Bowes/Simpkin/Florent
Keep in mind Taranto/Bowes/Simpkin/Florent would be F5.
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 05:55:42 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 24, 2017, 05:50:28 PM
Vince, Pendles, Taranto (F5) & 64k vs Lloyd, Rocky, Steele (F5)
Vince, Pendles, Taranto but I'd personally prefer someone other than Vince with the 64k, such as Howe, Laird, or Adams if you don't have them. Up to you of course though.
Quote from: js19 on March 24, 2017, 05:50:51 PM
Gawn, Titch and Florent
Vs
Pendles, Buddy and Witts
Pendles, Buddy, and Witts
Have Shaw and Laird so didn't want Adams esp with his injury history. Can go Lloyd instead and keep $105k up my sleeve...
Steele does look good though and make my Fwds stronger. Also Taranto's JS is not as good with Lids/Conigs back.
Turner vs Parfitt vs Houston
Quote from: tommy10 on March 24, 2017, 05:50:28 PM
Vince, Pendles, Taranto (F5) & 64k vs Lloyd, Rocky, Steele (F5)
2nd option
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 24, 2017, 01:41:57 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on March 24, 2017, 01:37:16 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 24, 2017, 01:35:13 PM
Alrighty, made a few adjustments and need help with the final piece. Best defender under 362K.
These are the options I'm looking at: Hurley, Carlisle, Z.Jones, Ramsay or Thurlow?
Hurley is 464k
Jones or Thurlow for me
Lol, I read Hurley instead of Hartley! Thank flower for that!
Was on Thurlow all pre season, I have this gut feeling that he got injured that last JLT and will miss this week...think I'll roll with Jones and if I need to correct the so be it.
I flowering called it!
lloyd, danger, martin(ruck), roughead
vs
shaw, jpk, witts, nroo
love panic trading ;D
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 24, 2017, 06:33:36 PM
lloyd, danger, martin(ruck), roughead
vs
shaw, jpk, witts, nroo
love panic trading ;D
What about Shaw, Danger, Witts, Buddy?
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 06:25:40 PM
Parfitt
Alright, I have another couple then since I started playing with my team now and I really want that extra mid premium back
Sloane vs Selwood
and then
Sloane/Selwood, Preuss, Steele and Houston (F6 with SPP M7, SPS M8 and Parfitt M10) vs Swallow (M7), O'Meara (M6), Roughy(F3) and Witts (R3)
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 06:36:03 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 24, 2017, 06:33:36 PM
lloyd, danger, martin(ruck), roughead
vs
shaw, jpk, witts, nroo
love panic trading ;D
What about Shaw, Danger, Witts, Buddy?
That works too. Kinda big on roo this year though. But in saying that Buddy should go well too.
worth losing Martin though? really could get back to 110
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 24, 2017, 06:33:36 PM
lloyd, danger, martin(ruck), roughead
vs
shaw, jpk, witts, nroo
love panic trading ;D
I prefer Danger and Martin in combo one but 2 is pretty even across the board apart from R2. I'd be pretty tempted to take the stab with combo 2 if you think JPK can get close to Danger because in my opinion Shaw>>Lloyd and NRoo>>> Roughy
EDIT: If the combo Tom said works I'd go with that.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 24, 2017, 06:37:31 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2017, 06:25:40 PM
Parfitt
Alright, I have another couple then since I started playing with my team now and I really want that extra mid premium back
Sloane vs Selwood
and then
Sloane/Selwood, Preuss, Steele and Houston (F6 with SPP M7, SPS M8 and Parfitt M10) vs Swallow (M7), O'Meara (M6), Roughy(F3) and Witts (R3)
I think Selwood. Sloane seems a bit injury prone these days. Selwood will go 110+ for sure.
And I think Option 2. Mainly because having SPP and SPS on field would worry me haha.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 24, 2017, 06:39:37 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 24, 2017, 06:33:36 PM
lloyd, danger, martin(ruck), roughead
vs
shaw, jpk, witts, nroo
love panic trading ;D
I prefer Danger and Martin in combo one but 2 is pretty even across the board apart from R2. I'd be pretty tempted to take the stab with combo 2 if you think JPK can get close to Danger because in my opinion Shaw>>Lloyd and NRoo>>> Roughy
EDIT: If the combo Tom said works I'd go with that.
Lloyd and Roughead are 'maybe 95' where as you know what you're getting with Shaw and Buddy.
Witts scares the living crap out of me but he would be the only iffy selection instead of 2 (lloyd roughead)
2 hours to decide lol!
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 24, 2017, 06:43:32 PM
Lloyd and Roughead are 'maybe 95' where as you know what you're getting with Shaw and Buddy.
Witts scares the living crap out of me but he would be the only iffy selection instead of 2 (lloyd roughead)
2 hours to decide lol!
You actually have all of tonight to decide. As long as it's not a Dogs or Collingwood player they don't lock out. I have my Pies and Dogs locked in so I'm going to keep tinkering.
I don't like Witts as a R2, but I think you get a substantial jump from Roughy>Buddy and Lloyd>Shaw. I don't know if Stef goes 110 in SC again and if it was Goldy/Gawn I would be thinking differently.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 24, 2017, 06:46:14 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 24, 2017, 06:43:32 PM
Lloyd and Roughead are 'maybe 95' where as you know what you're getting with Shaw and Buddy.
Witts scares the living crap out of me but he would be the only iffy selection instead of 2 (lloyd roughead)
2 hours to decide lol!
You actually have all of tonight to decide. As long as it's not a Dogs or Collingwood player they don't lock out. I have my Pies and Dogs locked in so I'm going to keep tinkering.
I don't like Witts as a R2, but I think you get a substantial jump from Roughy>Buddy and Lloyd>Shaw. I don't know if Stef goes 110 in SC again and if it was Goldy/Gawn I would be thinking differently.
Oh yeah, you're right :D
I've had doubts on Rough all pre season but put him in last minute because it allowed an extra mid premo (Cripps) which was a fail lol. Will hold him though. And obviously went Shaw down to Lloyd too for cash, who I actually think can go 95 this year, but its risky.
I think Witts can average 75 minimum so he'll make money. Just looks real risky haha.
Otten v's Smith (Dee's)
WHE Vs Taranto? Turning one into Nroo now that Otten has made the cut
Kelly (GWS), Martin R1, Taranto vs Rocky, Witts, Steele
Quote from: colmullet on March 24, 2017, 07:28:59 PM
WHE Vs Taranto? Turning one into Nroo now that Otten has made the cut
taranto easily imo
Quote from: tommy10 on March 24, 2017, 07:29:54 PM
Kelly (GWS), Martin R1, Taranto vs Rocky, Witts, Steele
EDIT: Actually thats a hard one lol. If you believe in Steele/Witts then Option 2 is good. Tough.
.G.Horlan-Smith vs D.Swallow
Swallow easily.
Shaw, Witts & Roughead vs Bob Murphy, Gawn and Simpkin?
Quote from: Jimmykidd on March 24, 2017, 07:30:39 PM
Quote from: colmullet on March 24, 2017, 07:28:59 PM
WHE Vs Taranto? Turning one into Nroo now that Otten has made the cut
taranto easily imo
Quote from: tommy10 on March 24, 2017, 07:29:54 PM
Kelly (GWS), Martin R1, Taranto vs Rocky, Witts, Steele
EDIT: Actually thats a hard one lol. If you believe in Steele/Witts then Option 2 is good. Tough.
Tell me about it lol
Quote from: lukebomber on March 24, 2017, 07:37:57 PM
Shaw, Witts & Roughead vs Bob Murphy, Gawn and Simpkin?
Option 1 mate
Pick me a rd11 defender:
Vince vs JJ vs Lloyd
(or any other?)
Quote from: MC on March 24, 2017, 08:11:21 PM
Pick me a rd11 defender:
Vince vs JJ vs Lloyd
(or any other?)
Lloyd
Pendles + McGrath
Vs
Shaw + Swallow
Can you go someone other then McGrath? I prefer Pendles to Shaw but Swallow makes up the difference in points and some.
Completely irrelevant, but I just want to say as a anti-Collingwood supporter. We all know Pendlebury is a gun, but his defense ability tonight has been top top class.
D Swallow + Goldy vs Robbie Gray + Sandi
Quote from: dottman on March 24, 2017, 11:08:03 PM
Completely irrelevant, but I just want to say as a anti-Collingwood supporter. We all know Pendlebury is a gun, but his defense ability tonight has been top top class.
He's all class, super player ultra reliable. Can't start a SC season without him.
Buddy vs T. Greene
Quote from: Blairholt on March 24, 2017, 11:47:17 PM
D Swallow + Goldy vs Robbie Gray + Sandi
Can you go another option to Gray? I don't like the bye.
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on March 25, 2017, 12:45:26 AM
Buddy vs T. Greene
I was choosing between these two and Caddy... I chose Caddy :-\
Think Buddy's scores will fluctuate more but he will end up scoring slightly higher than Greene.
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on March 25, 2017, 12:45:26 AM
Buddy vs T. Greene
Buddy. He is always a threat to go huge.
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 12:49:26 AM
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on March 25, 2017, 12:45:26 AM
Buddy vs T. Greene
I was choosing between these two and Caddy... I chose Caddy :-\
Think Buddy's scores will fluctuate more but he will end up scoring slightly higher than Greene.
Same here money, dont you just love supercoach?
Didn't know whether to start a new thread or not but decided to post here.
I have the vice captain on pendles but no loophole option him scoring so well led me to think outside the box a bit and I've come up with three options.
Smith and Preuss: both have questionable JS at best but in saying that are both named round one and have shown that they can score well, Smith played a third tall/intercept mark role over the JLT which turned into two decent scores and Preuss should kill west coast along with Goldy.
Barrett and Cameron: Barrett would have to have stronger job security and dominated the NEAFL last year however looks to be playing a forward flank who rotates into the mid which means he's scores won't be amazing (I think he will average 60-65 which is serviceable) Cameron will be a floating donut this week but hopefully will come in soon and allow me to make some cash which is a bonus and he looks like he has the potential to go 70+ when he plays.
Powell-Pepper and Strnidica: Powell-Pepper probably has the best job security and the best scoring potential (70+) which makes him very tempting. Strnidica can be used as a permanent floating donut and allow me too loop hole every week which could potential give me 1000 extra points come seasons end but I won't be making money off him.
Thanks guys :)
T.Mitchell + S.Martin vs Goldy/Gawn + O'Meara
Goldy/Gawn + O'Meara
Option 1: JPK (110) + Zac Jones (80) + 45k (190 total pts)
Option 2: Titch (105-110)+ Zac Jones + 97k (185-195 pts)
Option 3: Clayton Oliver (90-100) + heath shaw (100-105) + 10k (190-205)
Option 4: Clayton Oliver + Zac Jones + 290k (170 pts)
In brackets is what i believe they might average this year. I know most will probably say option 1, 2 or 3 but I really rate Oliver this year. Considering this I may only be 30 pts down in points but what it does do is open up the opportunity for me to grab the right corrective trades. El. Bowes, JPK or Titch etc... depending on who is performing better. Cheers in anticipation!
Andy Otten vs Dan Houston
I can swing a few players around to pick one of these guys. Leaning towards Otten but not sure...
Quote from: jfitty on March 25, 2017, 09:31:35 AM
Andy Otten vs Dan Houston
I can swing a few players around to pick one of these guys. Leaning towards Otten but not sure...
yeah I think I'd lean towards often also
2 of Otten, Smith and Hibberd. one will be on field.
Quote from: crowls on March 25, 2017, 10:37:18 AM
2 of Otten, Smith and Hibberd. one will be on field.
Otten on field with Hibberd on the bench.
Houston or Parfitt at F7
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 11:26:56 AM
Houston or Parfitt at F7
If you have Eddy, I'd go for Parfitt. Better bye.
Preuss vs Cameron
Looking at long term prospects. Can Preuss hold his spot?? Like Cameron's DPP
Quote from: juzztheball on March 25, 2017, 11:33:05 AM
Preuss vs Cameron
Looking at long term prospects. Can Preuss hold his spot?? Like Cameron's DPP
I've kept Cameron for his DPP. Easily bring Nank into R2 if needed
goldy + steele vs stef martin + higgins
Quote from: Chrispy75 on March 25, 2017, 11:59:04 AM
goldy + steele vs stef martin + higgins
Considering Goldy will score more than Martin and Steele will score more than Higgins I would go Goldy/Steele ;)
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 12:05:51 PM
Quote from: Chrispy75 on March 25, 2017, 11:59:04 AM
goldy + steele vs stef martin + higgins
Considering Goldy will score more than Martin and Steele will score more than Higgins I would go Goldy/Steele ;)
I see Higgins beating Steele by 5-10ppg, but Higgins is an injury risk and Gawn will beat Stef you'd think
Quote from: Bluesman on March 25, 2017, 09:20:28 AM
Option 1: JPK (110) + Zac Jones (80) + 45k (190 total pts)
Option 2: Titch (105-110)+ Zac Jones + 97k (185-195 pts)
Option 3: Clayton Oliver (90-100) + heath shaw (100-105) + 10k (190-205)
Option 4: Clayton Oliver + Zac Jones + 290k (170 pts)
In brackets is what i believe they might average this year. I know most will probably say option 1, 2 or 3 but I really rate Oliver this year. Considering this I may only be 30 pts down in points but what it does do is open up the opportunity for me to grab the right corrective trades. El. Bowes, JPK or Titch etc... depending on who is performing better. Cheers in anticipation!
Option 1, don't like the Oliver pick personally, and prefer JPK over Tmitch
Cameron vs Strnadica?
Obviously Strnadica will be better for loopholing, but Cameron could make a bit of money. Not sure if he comes into the Swans 22 once his finger/hand/whatever recovers, and don't think it's worth starting him if he doesn't play until like halfway through the season...but if he does come in soon then he could be the better option. Not interested in Preuss, as I need the R/F DPP to swing Nank into the rucks if necessary.
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:15:57 PM
Cameron vs Strnadica?
Obviously Strnadica will be better for loopholing, but Cameron could make a bit of money. Not sure if he comes into the Swans 22 once his finger/hand/whatever recovers, and don't think it's worth starting him if he doesn't play until like halfway through the season...but if he does come in soon then he could be the better option. Not interested in Preuss, as I need the R/F DPP to swing Nank into the rucks if necessary.
Start with Strnadica.
Hopefully Cameron comes in at about round 5 and we can downgrade someone like Parfitt/Houston to him :)
My final decision.
Hibberd/Houston V Smith/Barrett
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:13:40 PM
Quote from: Bluesman on March 25, 2017, 09:20:28 AM
Option 1: JPK (110) + Zac Jones (80) + 45k (190 total pts)
Option 2: Titch (105-110)+ Zac Jones + 97k (185-195 pts)
Option 3: Clayton Oliver (90-100) + heath shaw (100-105) + 10k (190-205)
Option 4: Clayton Oliver + Zac Jones + 290k (170 pts)
In brackets is what i believe they might average this year. I know most will probably say option 1, 2 or 3 but I really rate Oliver this year. Considering this I may only be 30 pts down in points but what it does do is open up the opportunity for me to grab the right corrective trades. El. Bowes, JPK or Titch etc... depending on who is performing better. Cheers in anticipation!
Option 1, don't like the Oliver pick personally, and prefer JPK over Tmitch
Thanks GL :)
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 12:18:17 PM
My final decision.
Hibberd/Houston V Smith/Barrett
I dislike the JS of SMith, so would go Hibberd and Houston. Ideally though, you'd probably want Barrett in there as well.
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 12:16:59 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:15:57 PM
Cameron vs Strnadica?
Obviously Strnadica will be better for loopholing, but Cameron could make a bit of money. Not sure if he comes into the Swans 22 once his finger/hand/whatever recovers, and don't think it's worth starting him if he doesn't play until like halfway through the season...but if he does come in soon then he could be the better option. Not interested in Preuss, as I need the R/F DPP to swing Nank into the rucks if necessary.
Start with Strnadica.
Hopefully Cameron comes in at about round 5 and we can downgrade someone like Parfitt/Houston to him :)
Yeah, I'm kinda hoping he comes in after at least a month (if at all), because otherwise won't be worth downgrading to him in like round 3. Cheers mate :)
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:23:28 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2017, 12:18:17 PM
My final decision.
Hibberd/Houston V Smith/Barrett
I dislike the JS of SMith, so would go Hibberd and Houston. Ideally though, you'd probably want Barrett in there as well.
I'm leaning towards Barret/Smith purely because Barrett has the best job security. Don't rate Hibberds job security tbh as Vickers-Willis is right behind him, Houston has Bonner who is right behind him and Impey, Krakouer coming in next week could take his spot, yes Smith's is the worst but I don't rate the other guys much better.
Gawn & Florent vs Martin & Steele?
Quote from: tkringle on March 25, 2017, 01:06:23 PM
Gawn & Florent vs Martin & Steele?
Gawn and Florent for me.
Which two of Miles, Florent and Parfitt?
Miles isn't playing so I'd go with Florent and Parfitt.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 25, 2017, 01:13:19 PM
Miles isn't playing so I'd go with Florent and Parfitt.
Goldstein vs Gawn
Still can't finalise my Higgins, Rough, Steele, Swallow choices. Have cooled off on Swallow and Rough, but can't afford Higgins and Steele together. So my choices are:
Higgins + Swallow vs Rough + Steele?
Or I could go Steele/Rough + Swalllow and keep cash for early upgrades?
Or I could Taranto > Bowes/Florent to get the cash for Higgins + Steele?
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2017, 02:54:24 PM
Still can't finalise my Higgins, Rough, Steele, Swallow choices. Have cooled off on Swallow and Rough, but can't afford Higgins and Steele together. So my choices are:
Higgins + Swallow vs Rough + Steele?
Higgins and Swallow no doubt I reckon
Quote from: TomK on March 25, 2017, 02:56:51 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2017, 02:54:24 PM
Still can't finalise my Higgins, Rough, Steele, Swallow choices. Have cooled off on Swallow and Rough, but can't afford Higgins and Steele together. So my choices are:
Higgins + Swallow vs Rough + Steele?
Higgins and Swallow no doubt I reckon
Thanks, I added some edits as well.
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2017, 02:58:44 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 25, 2017, 02:56:51 PM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2017, 02:54:24 PM
Still can't finalise my Higgins, Rough, Steele, Swallow choices. Have cooled off on Swallow and Rough, but can't afford Higgins and Steele together. So my choices are:
Higgins + Swallow vs Rough + Steele?
Higgins and Swallow no doubt I reckon
Thanks, I added some edits as well.
If you're set on Steele, I don't mind him and Swallow. I don't mind the Steele and Higgins option either but depending on where Taranto was, if he was F6, go for it, if F5, I wouldn't feel that comfortable then.
I like Steele and Swallow if you can swing that with Taranto as a rookie.
Last choice:
1. Goldy O'mera
2. Gawn Swallow
Last MID spot up for grabs.
Current Mids: Danger, Pendles, Treloar, Fyfe and Beams
T.Mitchell (bank $62k) vs JPK/Hanners/Jelwood (bank $0-10k)
Quote from: Huttabito on March 25, 2017, 03:23:23 PM
Last MID spot up for grabs.
Current Mids: Danger, Pendles, Treloar, Fyfe and Beams
T.Mitchell (bank $62k) vs JPK/Hanners/Jelwood (bank $0-10k)
JPK
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 03:24:37 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on March 25, 2017, 03:23:23 PM
Last MID spot up for grabs.
Current Mids: Danger, Pendles, Treloar, Fyfe and Beams
T.Mitchell (bank $62k) vs JPK/Hanners/Jelwood (bank $0-10k)
JPK
Hanners :P
Hanners
Midfield is
Pendlebury, JPK, Bontempelli, Fyfe, Beams, Omera, PP
Last spot is up for grabs
Selwood v Hanners v Parker v Rockcliff v Neale v T. Mitchell
Quote from: smashbox on March 25, 2017, 03:43:30 PM
Midfield is
Pendlebury, JPK, Bontempelli, Fyfe, Beams, Omera, PP
Last spot is up for grabs
Selwood v Hanners v Parker v Rockcliff v Neale v T. Mitchell
Hanners
What 3 player combo. 1 mid 2 forwards
D Swallow, Devon Smith, Roughy
V
JPK, Steele, Bowes.
Had combo 1 up until today, but changed to option 2 just before. Thoughts?
Quote from: leighroids on March 25, 2017, 03:56:20 PM
What 3 player combo. 1 mid 2 forwards
D Swallow, Devon Smith, Roughy
V
JPK, Steele, Bowes.
Had combo 1 up until today, but changed to option 2 just before. Thoughts?
JPK, Steele, Bowes. (although consider Schoey)
Stef Martin 488k no archie or goldie better player 588k.Only thing stopping me from Goldstein is him Brown and Preuss being in the 1 side
Gawn vs Goldy +70K
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 25, 2017, 04:18:58 PM
Gawn vs Goldy +70K
I'm having the same debate. A lot of the feedback I have had said Gawn. Goldy is awfully tempting though, especially coming up against Vardy/Petrie this week
Mountford vs Houston
Houston. Mountford is probably out next week for Cunners.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 25, 2017, 04:26:38 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 25, 2017, 04:18:58 PM
Gawn vs Goldy +70K
I'm having the same debate. A lot of the feedback I have had said Gawn. Goldy is awfully tempting though, especially coming up against Vardy/Petrie this week
Goldy
Hanners V Selwood V T. Mitchell V Neale
Houston vs J. Smith (Melb)
Quote from: essendon2 on March 25, 2017, 05:01:39 PM
Cheers, last one:
Buddy vs T. Lynch (GC)
I see Tom Lynch as the ideal upgrade target. His bye you still need to fill a full team and then he plays all through the regular bye weeks. I'd go with Buddy based on that alone.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 25, 2017, 04:54:49 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 04:34:38 PM
Goldy
Reasoning?
He has been up the top for a while now, and with most rucks generally struggling to back up elite seasons, think he's a better starting pick than Gawn.
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 05:07:39 PM
He has been up the top for a while now, and with most rucks generally struggling to back up elite seasons, think he's a better starting pick than Gawn.
That's pretty much been my reasoning for going with him originally. Gawn's floor is unknown, I'm still pretty sure Goldy's floor is 105 which is still probably good enough for top 2 at the position.
Swallow & Taranto or Beams & Otten, (had to move Hibberd to mids)
Quote from: hawkboy80 on March 25, 2017, 08:24:21 PM
Swallow & Taranto or Beams & Otten, (had to move Hibberd to mids)
Swallow being out already makes me nervous about his durability
I don't think you can risk sitting that much cash in round 1. Go with Beams and Otten.
GHS vs Taranto as Swallow's replacement?
Swallow to GHS or Swallow to Turner/McCarthy and Stef to Goldy?
I don't like GHS so the other one.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 25, 2017, 08:53:35 PM
I don't like GHS so the other one.
Yeah not too keen on him atm either. Other option is holding Swallow and banking ~80 from SPP as emg
The only downside to holding Swallow is what happens if he is injured longer then 1 week. You have to burn the trade later. I'd be tempted to grab Turner and Goldy and hope that Goldy outscores Stef more then SPP potentially outscores Turner. I'm thinking Turner will probably get a 50-60 based on the West Coast defense.
Why not GHS???
Guys, do I hold Swallow and get SPP's score? Or go to GHS or even Otten swinging Hibberd to the middle and pocket the 160k for any correction trades?
Quote from: TomK on March 25, 2017, 09:00:10 PM
Guys, do I hold Swallow and get SPP's score? Or go to GHS or even Otten swinging Hibberd to the middle and pocket the 160k for any correction trades?
flower it, decided to hold
Quote from: mzunguman on March 25, 2017, 08:59:49 PM
Why not GHS???
He will probably tag and he has been hyped up about almost every year and continued to suck every year. He isn't really good at all. You're better off banking the cash on someone else.
Quote from: TomK on March 25, 2017, 09:00:10 PM
Guys, do I hold Swallow and get SPP's score? Or go to GHS or even Otten swinging Hibberd to the middle and pocket the 160k for any correction trades?
If you're willing to risk burning a trade later on if Swallow doesn't come back quickly then hold Swallow. I wouldn't bring in GHS though as stated above.
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:13:40 PM
Quote from: Bluesman on March 25, 2017, 09:20:28 AM
Option 1: JPK (110) + Zac Jones (80) + 45k (190 total pts)
Option 2: Titch (105-110)+ Zac Jones + 97k (185-195 pts)
Option 3: Clayton Oliver (90-100) + heath shaw (100-105) + 10k (190-205)
Option 4: Clayton Oliver + Zac Jones + 290k (170 pts)
In brackets is what i believe they might average this year. I know most will probably say option 1, 2 or 3 but I really rate Oliver this year. Considering this I may only be 30 pts down in points but what it does do is open up the opportunity for me to grab the right corrective trades. El. Bowes, JPK or Titch etc... depending on who is performing better. Cheers in anticipation!
Option 1, don't like the Oliver pick personally, and prefer JPK over Tmitch
Arguably BOG - 36 possies, 14 contested, 9 clearances and 8 tackes and how many SC points?? - that's right 109!!! what a load of BS!!! Yes I know he had 9 kicks and 27 handballs which doesn't help his cause but I'll say again...THIS KID'S THE NEXT PRIDDIS! haha..
Quote from: TomK on March 25, 2017, 09:00:10 PM
Guys, do I hold Swallow and get SPP's score? Or go to GHS or even Otten swinging Hibberd to the middle and pocket the 160k for any correction trades?
+1
Cam McCarthy vs Kayne Turner vs any other forward or mid rookie under 224k that hasn't played yet (have Taranto, Simpkin, Parfitt already)
I had Kayne Turner most of the pre-season before I turned him into Houston today.
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 26, 2017, 01:26:04 AM
I had Kayne Turner most of the pre-season before I turned him into Houston today.
I'm thinking Turner slightly better scoring but McCarthy better JS. But with Turner being cheaper as well...leaning towards him.
Where do you have Parfitt? Forward line or midfield?
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 26, 2017, 01:31:17 AM
Where do you have Parfitt? Forward line or midfield?
Got him in the mids atm
Can you swing Parfitt to the forward line, Hibberd to the mids and see if you can grab the best available defender?
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 26, 2017, 01:44:25 AM
Can you swing Parfitt to the forward line, Hibberd to the mids and see if you can grab the best available defender?
Yeah, I could do that. For defenders, already have Hampton, Hibberd, and Stewart (and Marchbank as well). Not sold on the JS of Otten though who i think is really the only other option, unless I'm totally forgetting someone haha
Jake Kelly is the other. I think holding Otten at D8 couldn't be any worse then Turner at F6. You make more cash on it as well and it gives you options for corrective trades down the track.
Hmmm maybe, might sleep on it :P
Extra cash would be decent
OK here is my query...
Went with Nank in ruck position instead of Fwd. Have Nank and Sandi R1 & 2.
Question is- Do I keep Pruess at R3 as cover OR do I get Strnadica and bank 20k and create a loophole?
Pruess= cover but shaky JS
vs.
Strnadica= save 20k plus have loophole
Quote from: HoleMeal on March 26, 2017, 08:22:17 AM
OK here is my query...
Went with Nank in ruck position instead of Fwd. Have Nank and Sandi R1 & 2.
Question is- Do I keep Pruess at R3 as cover OR do I get Strnadica and bank 20k and create a loophole?
Pruess= cover but shaky JS
vs.
Strnadica= save 20k plus have loophole
I'm faced with a similar decision..
No idea why you have Nank in the rucks though?! :o
I'm leaning towards taking Preuss and hoping he scores ok and makes $100k then I can trade him to Strnadica.. I think he's good for a 50-70 per game
Quote from: King_Robbo on March 26, 2017, 12:57:47 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on March 26, 2017, 08:22:17 AM
OK here is my query...
Went with Nank in ruck position instead of Fwd. Have Nank and Sandi R1 & 2.
Question is- Do I keep Pruess at R3 as cover OR do I get Strnadica and bank 20k and create a loophole?
Pruess= cover but shaky JS
vs.
Strnadica= save 20k plus have loophole
I'm faced with a similar decision..
No idea why you have Nank in the rucks though?! :o
I'm leaning towards taking Preuss and hoping he scores ok and makes $100k then I can trade him to Strnadica.. I think he's good for a 50-70 per game
I went with Strnadica myself, but I also had Nank forward instead of in the rucks. With Nank in the rucks...Preuss could be the better option.
Traded out swallow last night :o
Mzungu vs McCarthy vs Hrovat vs anyone else?
Quote from: toddycgs on March 26, 2017, 01:18:21 PM
Traded out swallow last night :o
Mzungu vs McCarthy vs Hrovat vs anyone else?
taranto if you dont already have him, otherwise from that list id get hrovat
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 26, 2017, 01:55:43 PM
Quote from: toddycgs on March 26, 2017, 01:18:21 PM
Traded out swallow last night :o
Mzungu vs McCarthy vs Hrovat vs anyone else?
taranto if you dont already have him, otherwise from that list id get hrovat
Already have Taranto - who has better JS out of Hrovat/Mzungu?
Quote from: toddycgs on March 26, 2017, 02:00:52 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 26, 2017, 01:55:43 PM
Quote from: toddycgs on March 26, 2017, 01:18:21 PM
Traded out swallow last night :o
Mzungu vs McCarthy vs Hrovat vs anyone else?
taranto if you dont already have him, otherwise from that list id get hrovat
Already have Taranto - who has better JS out of Hrovat/Mzungu?
Hrovat i reckon
Quote from: King_Robbo on March 26, 2017, 12:57:47 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on March 26, 2017, 08:22:17 AM
OK here is my query...
Went with Nank in ruck position instead of Fwd. Have Nank and Sandi R1 & 2.
Question is- Do I keep Pruess at R3 as cover OR do I get Strnadica and bank 20k and create a loophole?
Pruess= cover but shaky JS
vs.
Strnadica= save 20k plus have loophole
I'm faced with a similar decision..
No idea why you have Nank in the rucks though?! :o
I'm leaning towards taking Preuss and hoping he scores ok and makes $100k then I can trade him to Strnadica.. I think he's good for a 50-70 per game
Nothing wrong with having Nank R1 and Sandi R2 IMO.
I have Ryder at F4 with Strnadica so have ruck cover.
I'll upgrade Sandilands to Gawn/Goldy and one of my forwards (Ryder maybe?) to Goldy.
Nank will then go back to the forward line.
I personally think Gawn was way too expensive to start with and Goldy has a bit of uncertainty with him in regards to his knee, Norths weaker team due to all the retirements and Pruess sharing the ruck duties with him.
Have to trade Joel Smith, and via some DPP action deciding between:
Dan Houston vs Mitch Hannan
Leaning towards Hannan at this stage, the Demons must see something in him to debut without playing JLT. Plus he scored really well on the weekend.
Thinking of pulling the trigger this week to keep 2 trades up the sleeve for next week in case...
Looking for a 400k Fwd to trade in for Roo to be able to swap J smith to McGrath due to shocking DEF rookies..
So Wingard Vs T. Miler Vs Ryder Vs Petracca
Quote from: jfitty on March 29, 2017, 09:30:40 AM
Have to trade Joel Smith, and via some DPP action deciding between:
Dan Houston vs Mitch Hannan
Leaning towards Hannan at this stage, the Demons must see something in him to debut without playing JLT. Plus he scored really well on the weekend.
Thinking of pulling the trigger this week to keep 2 trades up the sleeve for next week in case...
Tough one that I'm trying to work out as well, I reckon Houston may be more likely to hold his spot long term but it's 50/50
Quote from: rocky38 on March 29, 2017, 10:02:07 PM
Looking for a 400k Fwd to trade in for Roo to be able to swap J smith to McGrath due to shocking DEF rookies..
So Wingard Vs T. Miler Vs Ryder Vs Petracca
Ryder or Touk probably, if you want the ruck cover go Ryder.
Quote from: Bluesman on March 25, 2017, 11:45:43 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2017, 12:13:40 PM
Quote from: Bluesman on March 25, 2017, 09:20:28 AM
Option 1: JPK (110) + Zac Jones (80) + 45k (190 total pts)
Option 2: Titch (105-110)+ Zac Jones + 97k (185-195 pts)
Option 3: Clayton Oliver (90-100) + heath shaw (100-105) + 10k (190-205)
Option 4: Clayton Oliver + Zac Jones + 290k (170 pts)
In brackets is what i believe they might average this year. I know most will probably say option 1, 2 or 3 but I really rate Oliver this year. Considering this I may only be 30 pts down in points but what it does do is open up the opportunity for me to grab the right corrective trades. El. Bowes, JPK or Titch etc... depending on who is performing better. Cheers in anticipation!
Option 1, don't like the Oliver pick personally, and prefer JPK over Tmitch
Arguably BOG - 36 possies, 14 contested, 9 clearances and 8 tackes and how many SC points?? - that's right 109!!! what a load of BS!!! Yes I know he had 9 kicks and 27 handballs which doesn't help his cause but I'll say again...THIS KID'S THE NEXT PRIDDIS! haha..
Haha, jacked score. I'm with ya though, definitely think he'll be Melbourne's best mid out of their up-and-coming brigade. Not sure about this season though.
Zak Jones & Touhy vs McGrath & shaw
Quote from: Bluesman on March 30, 2017, 09:15:55 AM
Zak Jones & Touhy vs McGrath & shaw
Zak Jones and Touhy
Zak Jones + SPP v Swallow + Stewart
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 30, 2017, 09:53:57 AM
Zak Jones + SPP v Swallow + Stewart
You didn't have SPP???
First one by a mile
Quote from: plumdog millionaire on March 30, 2017, 10:58:30 AM
Quote from: EazyMoney on March 30, 2017, 09:53:57 AM
Zak Jones + SPP v Swallow + Stewart
You didn't have SPP???
First one by a mile
Nah I do, but at M9, If Otten gets dropped, I'll make a couple of trades so I can do this. Don't know what I was thinking by playing SPP at m9.
can trade this week. Expecting otten and simpkin to get dropped.
mcgrath and hannan/butler v otten/simpkin
Quote from: crowls on March 30, 2017, 11:21:13 AM
I have Marchbank, Hampton, Otten, Stewart and Hibberd and have to start 3 of them.
Feeling exposed in DEF
can trade this week. Expecting otten and simpkin to get dropped.
mcgrath and hannan/butler v otten/simpkin
Mcgrath and Hannan
Quote from: crowls on March 30, 2017, 11:21:13 AM
can trade this week. Expecting otten and simpkin to get dropped.
mcgrath and hannan/butler v otten/simpkin
I'd be surprised if Simpkin got dropped tbh. Think he'll get another crack at things. Ideally you'd wanna hold this week to see who is the better choice from Hannan and Butler.
GL
7400 short of being able to trade Otten to McGrath. Possibility Hibberd and Otten both out. Can only upgrade to McGrath by moving on Simpkin and Otten. Can live with one non playing rookie as a loophole but not both.
Any ideas?
Higgins v Murphy
Houston + Murphy
vs
Roughead + SPP
Quote from: EazyMoney on April 02, 2017, 11:52:43 PM
Higgins v Murphy
murphy 1000%
Higgins was lucky to be scaled up so much in rd 1...his dt:sc ratio was crazy...
Quote from: piesfan1989 on April 02, 2017, 11:55:12 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on April 02, 2017, 11:52:43 PM
Higgins v Murphy
murphy 1000%
Higgins was lucky to be scaled up so much in rd 1...his dt:sc ratio was crazy...
It's because he uses the ball so well. He had 14 contested and 11 clearances Round 1, and his first quarter score wasn't added for the majority of the game until the end. So got scaled accordingly. And today, well he killed it. It's about what you consider more influential to your team.. IMO Higgins a better chance at top 6 v Murphy top 8 in their respective possies.
A forward averaging 120 or a mid averaging 134... what's more important?
Quote from: EazyMoney on April 02, 2017, 11:52:43 PM
Higgins v Murphy
This is also what I'm deciding between for trading out Ryder..
Murphy v Oliver
Quote from: mzunguman on April 03, 2017, 10:12:09 AM
Murphy v Oliver
I had Oliver in my team from the start as a POD, but I'm worried that Oliver might slow down later in the year, whereas Murphy is a seasoned veteran and has the better chance of becoming a premium keeper. Also with Murphy, he use to be heavily tagged, but now they are focusing more on Cripps and Gibbs, and if that continues, he will be a top 10 mid.
Oops been done lol
trade in Butler or wait a week for hayward?
Quote from: Samsturmfels on April 03, 2017, 02:44:17 PM
trade in Butler or wait a week for hayward?
I'm gonna look at bringing Butler in this week, but mainly cause it looks like the only way I can get in WHE aha (unless I trade Taranto or SPS which I don't really wanna do :P)
Sam Reid V Will Hoskin-Elliott
Bont & Hannan/Houston vs. Murphy & WHE
Quote from: Keeper27 on April 03, 2017, 06:57:23 PM
Bont & Hannan/Houston vs. Murphy & WHE
Tough one, Bont 120 + Houston 65 v Murphy 115 + WHE 80-85. Murphy may need trading ( I dont really think so) Houston and WHE will make similar money.
Houston or Butler?
Who to punt? Ryder or Roughy?
Quote from: no eye deer on April 03, 2017, 07:20:54 PM
Who to punt? Ryder or Roughy?
Ryder, unless he's your only cover for Sandilands.
Who to punt? Roughy or Steele?
Quote from: tmnxn on April 03, 2017, 07:30:59 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 03, 2017, 07:20:54 PM
Who to punt? Ryder or Roughy?
Ryder, unless he's your only cover for Sandilands.
Who to punt? Roughy or Steele?
Roughy has not looked like a 100+ yet. Steele should be getting leather poisoning with Steven out. I would punt roughy
Quote from: crowls on April 03, 2017, 07:57:22 PM
Quote from: tmnxn on April 03, 2017, 07:30:59 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 03, 2017, 07:20:54 PM
Who to punt? Ryder or Roughy?
Ryder, unless he's your only cover for Sandilands.
Who to punt? Roughy or Steele?
Roughy has not looked like a 100+ yet. Steele should be getting leather poisoning with Steven out. I would punt roughy
Agree with this.
Another one, JOM or Steele for Murphy?
Quote from: crowls on April 03, 2017, 07:57:22 PM
Quote from: tmnxn on April 03, 2017, 07:30:59 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 03, 2017, 07:20:54 PM
Who to punt? Ryder or Roughy?
Ryder, unless he's your only cover for Sandilands.
Who to punt? Roughy or Steele?
Roughy has not looked like a 100+ yet. Steele should be getting leather poisoning with Steven out. I would punt roughy
Don't forget, Hawks play GC this week. GWS had 5 players go 100+ and 4 go 90+ vs GC. I'm backing Roughy to go big this week.
Taranto v Horlin-Smith? Which one to keep and which one to trade?
To bring in this week,
Houston / Bont vs WHW / Murphy
Quote from: Thewizz71 on April 04, 2017, 08:03:52 AM
To bring in this week,
Houston / Bont vs WHW / Murphy
That's a tough one, the first option is the high risk, high reward approach. I'd take it provided Houston was sitting on the bench. The problem fielding Houston is the Pittard factor, surely his role will be modified once he returns.
Considering a trade is generally worth about 150k, would you take Bont or Murphy + pocket the 150k? I guess it comes down to whether you are going overall. Is 3700 out of it?
Quote from: Bluesman on April 04, 2017, 10:02:47 AM
Considering a trade is generally worth about 150k, would you take Bont or Murphy + pocket the 150k? I guess it comes down to whether you are going overall. Is 3700 out of it?
Even 37,000 isn't out of it this early...
Do you think Murphy will be a keeper? If so may be worth it, if not, Bont
Taranto vs Pickett
Goldy vs Nank
Quote from: NickyBoy on April 04, 2017, 11:04:47 AM
Taranto vs Pickett
Goldy vs Nank
(https://media.giphy.com/media/105OwsN7a4UQ2Q/giphy.gif)
*TA-RAN-TO
And Goldy on points, Nank for value
Option 1) Hanners and Schoenmakers --> Taylor Adams and WHE
OR
Option 2) Taranto and Schoenmakers --> Butler and WHE
Quote from: nathanjp24 on April 04, 2017, 02:29:38 PM
Option 1) Hanners and Schoenmakers --> Taylor Adams and WHE
OR
Option 2) Taranto and Schoenmakers --> Butler and WHE
2nd option mate
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:03:14 PM
Quote from: NickyBoy on April 04, 2017, 11:04:47 AM
Taranto vs Pickett
Goldy vs Nank
(https://media.giphy.com/media/105OwsN7a4UQ2Q/giphy.gif)
*TA-RAN-TO
And Goldy on points, Nank for value
ffs Dave, now I wanna watch LoTR :P
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 02:55:15 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:03:14 PM
Quote from: NickyBoy on April 04, 2017, 11:04:47 AM
Taranto vs Pickett
Goldy vs Nank
(https://media.giphy.com/media/105OwsN7a4UQ2Q/giphy.gif)
*TA-RAN-TO
And Goldy on points, Nank for value
ffs Dave, now I wanna watch LoTR :P
Are you saying there are times that you don't want to watch LotR? Tom pls
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:59:39 PM
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 02:55:15 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:03:14 PM
Quote from: NickyBoy on April 04, 2017, 11:04:47 AM
Taranto vs Pickett
Goldy vs Nank
(https://media.giphy.com/media/105OwsN7a4UQ2Q/giphy.gif)
*TA-RAN-TO
And Goldy on points, Nank for value
ffs Dave, now I wanna watch LoTR :P
Are you saying there are times that you don't want to watch LotR? Tom pls
There is never a time when I don't want to but it's either uni work or LotR now and I think we both know the correct answer :P
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 03:03:47 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:59:39 PM
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 02:55:15 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:03:14 PM
Quote from: NickyBoy on April 04, 2017, 11:04:47 AM
Taranto vs Pickett
Goldy vs Nank
(https://media.giphy.com/media/105OwsN7a4UQ2Q/giphy.gif)
*TA-RAN-TO
And Goldy on points, Nank for value
ffs Dave, now I wanna watch LoTR :P
Are you saying there are times that you don't want to watch LotR? Tom pls
There is never a time when I don't want to but it's either uni work or LotR now and I think we both know the correct answer :P
Understood. I'll be over with the extended edition of the fellowship asap.
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 03:20:53 PM
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 03:03:47 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:59:39 PM
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 02:55:15 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:03:14 PM
Quote from: NickyBoy on April 04, 2017, 11:04:47 AM
Taranto vs Pickett
Goldy vs Nank
(https://media.giphy.com/media/105OwsN7a4UQ2Q/giphy.gif)
*TA-RAN-TO
And Goldy on points, Nank for value
ffs Dave, now I wanna watch LoTR :P
Are you saying there are times that you don't want to watch LotR? Tom pls
There is never a time when I don't want to but it's either uni work or LotR now and I think we both know the correct answer :P
Understood. I'll be over with the extended edition of the fellowship asap.
Beautiful, looking forward to it.
Higgins v the Nank
Quote from: EazyMoney on April 04, 2017, 06:44:04 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on April 04, 2017, 06:13:07 PM
Higgins v the Nank
Higgins
No way...Nank 100% I have higgins but I don't have Nank...absolutely spewing that I'm not going to be able to get him into my team
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 03:41:55 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 03:20:53 PM
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 03:03:47 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:59:39 PM
Quote from: TomK on April 04, 2017, 02:55:15 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 04, 2017, 02:03:14 PM
Quote from: NickyBoy on April 04, 2017, 11:04:47 AM
Taranto vs Pickett
Goldy vs Nank
(https://media.giphy.com/media/105OwsN7a4UQ2Q/giphy.gif)
*TA-RAN-TO
And Goldy on points, Nank for value
ffs Dave, now I wanna watch LoTR :P
Are you saying there are times that you don't want to watch LotR? Tom pls
There is never a time when I don't want to but it's either uni work or LotR now and I think we both know the correct answer :P
Understood. I'll be over with the extended edition of the fellowship asap.
Beautiful, looking forward to it.
Look for my coming
Murphy v Wines and why...?
Quote from: TableKing on April 04, 2017, 11:20:48 PM
Murphy v Wines and why...?
murphy 100k cheaper
i reckon theyll both avg 108-114
roughead + SPP
vs
Omeara + Houston
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 04, 2017, 11:58:55 PM
roughead + SPP
vs
Omeara + Houston
Roughead + SPP. SPP is a gun, and Roughead is closer to being a keeper.
Jaeger & WHE
Vs
Murphy & Houston?
Rough + murphy
vs
Higgins + JOM
Witts or swallow?
Quote from: mzunguman on April 05, 2017, 02:02:24 PM
Witts or swallow?
Trading in? Gotta be Witts, as Swallow has only played the 1 game.
Quote from: GoLions on April 05, 2017, 02:03:43 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on April 05, 2017, 02:02:24 PM
Witts or swallow?
Trading in? Gotta be Witts, as Swallow has only played the 1 game.
Makes sense... reckon Nicholls will take witts spot though?
The more important/ better rookie to be trading in this week
Otten v Houston?
Who has the best JS?
Quote from: monga77 on April 06, 2017, 12:43:16 AM
The more important/ better rookie to be trading in this week
Otten v Houston?
Who has the best JS?
Id get Otten, both have crappy JS, however i feel Otten has a larger potential to score larger scores at times.
Missy Hamstring to Buddy or Murphy?
Or hold?
Quote from: Thewizz71 on April 06, 2017, 06:13:03 PM
Missy Hamstring to Buddy or Murphy?
Or hold?
probably buddy purely as I have 6 keepers in mids and want to keep my options open. Could also go Witts/Pruess and wait a week before committing to another prem. I still havent seen confirmation so I am waiting in hope it is not true.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on April 06, 2017, 06:13:03 PM
Missy Hamstring to Buddy or Murphy?
Or hold?
im confused
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 06, 2017, 06:49:58 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on April 06, 2017, 06:13:03 PM
Missy Hamstring to Buddy or Murphy?
Or hold?
im confused
Ignore. Missy is playing. That thread about Missy, Taranto etc has been removed.
trade out
Pickett vs Parfitt vs SPS
and bring in
Houston vs Butler?
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 06, 2017, 09:04:20 PM
trade out
Pickett vs Parfitt vs SPS
and bring in
Houston vs Butler?
Same question but twice over, Do I take 1 or both those cows?
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 06, 2017, 09:04:20 PM
trade out
Pickett vs Parfitt vs SPS
and bring in
Houston vs Butler?
Would love to know the answer to this one! Think Houston is the better player/scorer, but riskier JS with Pittard still to return.. Really not sure.
I've already made 3 trades and about to make a 4th.
Should i use that 4th to trade in a butler/houstan or wait for a hayward/smith/other to trade in??? Because if i trade in Butler it would be pretty unlikely id be able to get in another pure fwd rookie
Looking to dump Tom Lynch to Marc Murphy or Clayton Oliver via DPP.Murphy i think will score better but Oliver is well priced in what he is dishing up atm thoughts?
Quote from: rfc4eva on April 07, 2017, 07:55:13 PM
Looking to dump Tom Lynch to Marc Murphy or Clayton Oliver via DPP.Murphy i think will score better but Oliver is well priced in what he is dishing up atm thoughts?
Murphy over Oliver, however I would hold on to Lynch myself.
Barrett>Butler or
Pickett>Houston?
Can't switch them, as I need the cash difference to afford Ryder<Missy Higgins. Sort of wish I'd traded out Florent, but gave him another chance. :-\
Quote from: no eye deer on April 08, 2017, 06:52:58 AM
Barrett>Butler or
Pickett>Houston?
Can't switch them, as I need the cash difference to afford Ryder<Missy Higgins. Sort of wish I'd traded out Florent, but gave him another chance. :-\
Pickett to Houston for me. Houston slightly worse JS, but more consistant scoring. And Barrett more likely to lift tjan Puckett
Quote from: dmac07 on April 08, 2017, 01:41:13 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 08, 2017, 06:52:58 AM
Barrett>Butler or
Pickett>Houston?
Can't switch them, as I need the cash difference to afford Ryder<Missy Higgins. Sort of wish I'd traded out Florent, but gave him another chance. :-\
Pickett to Houston for me. Houston slightly worse JS, but more consistant scoring. And Barrett more likely to lift tjan Puckett
Cheers mate, yeah that's what I decided. Pickett can take his 30 average and flower off! A bit worried Barrett will get dropped soon, but meh, waddayado? :P
O'Meara > Bont/Dusty/Rocky/Sloane/Murphy?
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 12:57:37 AM
O'Meara > Bont/Dusty/Rocky/Sloane/Murphy?
They're all really good options.
Quote from: Bully on April 10, 2017, 12:59:32 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 12:57:37 AM
O'Meara > Bont/Dusty/Rocky/Sloane/Murphy?
They're all really good options.
Yeah can't go wrong at all, probably look at the byes to maybe split a few, or could just go with your gut.
JOM -> Murphy
Or
JOM -> Swallow and pocket $200k.
Swallow with an 88 & 117 in his rolling average now...
Quote from: Bully on April 10, 2017, 12:59:32 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 12:57:37 AM
O'Meara > Bont/Dusty/Rocky/Sloane/Murphy?
They're all really good options.
Thinking the Bont as he is such a superstar and I love watching him play.
Plus CD love him. LOL! ;D
Quote from: TomK on April 10, 2017, 01:02:56 AM
Quote from: Bully on April 10, 2017, 12:59:32 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 12:57:37 AM
O'Meara > Bont/Dusty/Rocky/Sloane/Murphy?
They're all really good options.
Yeah can't go wrong at all, probably look at the byes to maybe split a few, or could just go with your gut.
Haven't looked at the byes yet but I think that would rule out Sloane as he has the round 13 bye and I have too many missing then already.
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 01:12:11 AM
Quote from: TomK on April 10, 2017, 01:02:56 AM
Quote from: Bully on April 10, 2017, 12:59:32 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 12:57:37 AM
O'Meara > Bont/Dusty/Rocky/Sloane/Murphy?
They're all really good options.
Yeah can't go wrong at all, probably look at the byes to maybe split a few, or could just go with your gut.
Haven't looked at the byes yet but I think that would rule out Sloane as he has the round 13 bye and I have too many missing then already.
Dusty has the RD 12 bye, that would be favourable for most teams probably.
Quote from: TomK on April 10, 2017, 01:14:21 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 01:12:11 AM
Quote from: TomK on April 10, 2017, 01:02:56 AM
Quote from: Bully on April 10, 2017, 12:59:32 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 12:57:37 AM
O'Meara > Bont/Dusty/Rocky/Sloane/Murphy?
They're all really good options.
Yeah can't go wrong at all, probably look at the byes to maybe split a few, or could just go with your gut.
Haven't looked at the byes yet but I think that would rule out Sloane as he has the round 13 bye and I have too many missing then already.
Dusty has the RD 12 bye, that would be favourable for most teams probably.
Yeah that's true.
Might also look at Dusty.
Probably Bont or Dusty for me.
Dusty would be a great POD too.
Caddy> Greene or T. Miller
Quote from: patrickb55 on April 10, 2017, 10:17:07 AM
Caddy> Greene or T. Miller
Miller IMO due to more of a midfield role.
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 10, 2017, 01:00:53 PM
Quote from: patrickb55 on April 10, 2017, 10:17:07 AM
Caddy> Greene or T. Miller
Miller IMO due to more of a midfield role.
I do like Greene's scoring potential with goals he kicks reguarly, Miller but flip of the coin for me
Quote from: _wato on April 10, 2017, 01:05:13 AM
JOM -> Murphy
Or
JOM -> Swallow and pocket $230k.
Swallow with an 88 & 117 in his rolling average now...
Bummmmmp
Quote from: _wato on April 10, 2017, 03:08:38 PM
Quote from: _wato on April 10, 2017, 01:05:13 AM
JOM -> Murphy
Or
JOM -> Swallow and pocket $230k.
Swallow with an 88 & 117 in his rolling average now...
Bummmmmp
I'm going with Swallow. The $200k he will make will be more valuable in the long run
Quote from: Gambino on April 10, 2017, 03:14:01 PM
Quote from: _wato on April 10, 2017, 03:08:38 PM
Quote from: _wato on April 10, 2017, 01:05:13 AM
JOM -> Murphy
Or
JOM -> Swallow and pocket $230k.
Swallow with an 88 & 117 in his rolling average now...
Bummmmmp
I'm going with Swallow. The $200k he will make will be more valuable in the long run
With Murphy now, at his price he has to be a keeper. Swallow looks like making more money from this point onwards one would think. I dunno if Murphy can go 110+ from now on, but so far is looking like a top 10 mid. Swallow with the early bye puts me off a little bit, already missed round 1, and had hamstring soreness late in the game on the weekend I believe.
Gawn > ???
Tossing up Grundy and Stef Martin.
Haven't seen any Brisbane games, has Archie Smith been playing?
Other option is down to Witts and have $316k in the bank. Although no one ready to upgrade so would be sitting in the bank for a while.....
Archie Smith has been playing NEAFL Woppa and Stef has been sole ruck. Schache and Andrews have pinch hit in ruck. And to confuse the issue McInerney has been playing better than Smith in NEAFL.
Quote from: Ringo on April 11, 2017, 08:58:52 PM
Archie Smith has been playing NEAFL Woppa and Stef has been sole ruck. Schache and Andrews have pinch hit in ruck. And to confuse the issue McInerney has been playing better than Smith in NEAFL.
That has to be a good thing ringo. Last thing Martin owners need is Smith coming back in to the firsts.
Quote from: Ringo on April 11, 2017, 08:58:52 PM
Archie Smith has been playing NEAFL Woppa and Stef has been sole ruck. Schache and Andrews have pinch hit in ruck. And to confuse the issue McInerney has been playing better than Smith in NEAFL.
Cheers Ringo. Sounds promising. May just sway me towards stef. That plus he has a higher ceiling than Grundy.
OK here's one...
Assuming Pickett get's dropped along with Eddy...
Which one get's traded out?? (both in my fwd line)
Quote from: HoleMeal on April 12, 2017, 08:16:59 PM
OK here's one...
Assuming Pickett get's dropped along with Eddy...
Which one get's traded out?? (both in my fwd line)
Pickett better JS (even if dropped) and Eddy has higher scoring potential but probs finds it harder to get back into the team, especially if the power keep up good form, tough but i would trade Eddy
ok so if i trade Goldy i can get any mid.
Sloane Selwood Martin are the free im mainly looking at already got Pendles Fyfe Beams Rocky Bont Danger
Quote from: Holz on April 13, 2017, 01:43:41 PM
ok so if i trade Goldy i can get any mid.
Sloane Selwood Martin are the free im mainly looking at already got Pendles Fyfe Beams Rocky Bont Danger
Martin has looked super good. I would get him.
Quote from: Holz on April 13, 2017, 01:43:41 PM
ok so if i trade Goldy i can get any mid.
Sloane Selwood Martin are the free im mainly looking at already got Pendles Fyfe Beams Rocky Bont Danger
i would personally get sloane! martin second selwood third
Quote from: Holz on April 13, 2017, 01:43:41 PM
ok so if i trade Goldy i can get any mid.
Sloane Selwood Martin are the free im mainly looking at already got Pendles Fyfe Beams Rocky Bont Danger
Why not Murphy as a cheaper option?
Quote from: crowls on April 13, 2017, 01:54:56 PM
Quote from: Holz on April 13, 2017, 01:43:41 PM
ok so if i trade Goldy i can get any mid.
Sloane Selwood Martin are the free im mainly looking at already got Pendles Fyfe Beams Rocky Bont Danger
Why not Murphy as a cheaper option?
reckon all the top teams have him, others are bringing him. I dont think i can catch with him and im not convinced he will be a top 8 mid from here on out.
Sloane Dmart are better players then him
actually considering Docherty as he is looking like the top defender in the comp.
Quote from: Holz on April 13, 2017, 01:57:49 PM
Quote from: crowls on April 13, 2017, 01:54:56 PM
Quote from: Holz on April 13, 2017, 01:43:41 PM
ok so if i trade Goldy i can get any mid.
Sloane Selwood Martin are the free im mainly looking at already got Pendles Fyfe Beams Rocky Bont Danger
Why not Murphy as a cheaper option?
reckon all the top teams have him, others are bringing him. I dont think i can catch with him and im not convinced he will be a top 8 mid from here on out.
Sloane Dmart are better players then him
actually considering Docherty as he is looking like the top defender in the comp.
That is the problem I am facing now. Getting in players who are already in top SC teams doesn't allow you to catch up. Going POD means risk of falling further behind. Not going sanidlankwitts has limited my scores this season.
Martin and Murph look the standout options amongst the Mids. Martin potential to miss a couple with MRP and Murphy an injury risk. Would go Martin as he looks like matching Danger/Fyfe as a scoring mid superprem.
Quote from: crowls on April 13, 2017, 02:04:46 PM
Quote from: Holz on April 13, 2017, 01:57:49 PM
Quote from: crowls on April 13, 2017, 01:54:56 PM
Quote from: Holz on April 13, 2017, 01:43:41 PM
ok so if i trade Goldy i can get any mid.
Sloane Selwood Martin are the free im mainly looking at already got Pendles Fyfe Beams Rocky Bont Danger
Why not Murphy as a cheaper option?
reckon all the top teams have him, others are bringing him. I dont think i can catch with him and im not convinced he will be a top 8 mid from here on out.
Sloane Dmart are better players then him
actually considering Docherty as he is looking like the top defender in the comp.
That is the problem I am facing now. Getting in players who are already in top SC teams doesn't allow you to catch up. Going POD means risk of falling further behind. Not going sanidlankwitts has limited my scores this season.
Martin and Murph look the standout options amongst the Mids. Martin potential to miss a couple with MRP and Murphy an injury risk. Would go Martin as he looks like matching Danger/Fyfe as a scoring mid superprem.
Sloane has been the infrom player of the comp in round 2 and 3. Issue with him is big ball winning Brad Crouch coming back
Dusty is on fire and a gun issue for him is if they use him forward more and if not if he stops kicking goals. He wont keep up this scoring if he does he will kick 59 goals this season. He kicked 9 last year.
otten/newman + $38K vs. newman/Fox + $139K
Quote from: Keeper27 on April 13, 2017, 03:36:40 PM
otten/newman + $38K vs. newman/Fox + $139K
Otten's job security is much better than Fox's, so Otten/Newman + 38k.
See if you can wait a week and see how Williamson plays.
Willliamson vs Parsons (this week)
Butler vs Hampton (on field)
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 13, 2017, 08:07:34 PM
Willliamson vs Parsons (this week)
Butler vs Hampton (on field)
Probably Parsons, tough to say though. Butler on field out of those two.
Murphy/Miller/Heppell/Gaff/Kelly as O' Meara replacement.
Quote from: SilverLion on April 13, 2017, 08:10:54 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 13, 2017, 08:07:34 PM
Willliamson vs Parsons (this week)
Butler vs Hampton (on field)
Probably Parsons, tough to say though. Butler on field out of those two.
Murphy/Miller/Heppell/Gaff/Kelly as O' Meara replacement.
miller most likely to be a keeper in respective possie
Should I trade Barrett or Bowes to Swallow?
Barrett imo - Bastinac has been recalled and Bundy and Beastmode close so he may not get back in in the short term. Bowes is still playing but a slow burn.
Murphy + $86k, Bont + $23k or Pendles + $13k?
Rocky v Martin v Bont ??
Quote from: tommy10 on April 18, 2017, 02:58:34 PM
Murphy + $86k, Bont + $23k or Pendles + $13k?
Pendles
Hampton > Adams or Taranto > Macrae.
Plans going right will do one of these trades next week. Which would you prioritise first?
Would depend on team structure regarding prems and which needs strengthening first. Virtual 50/50 for me but if pressed would do Taranto to Macrae based on the fact Hampton should make a little more cash with the lower break even.
Yeo v Lynch (GC) v Buddy
Quote from: plumdog millionaire on April 20, 2017, 08:36:48 PM
Yeo v Lynch (GC) v Buddy
Buddy, basically because Lynch has the bye coming up and Yeo I'd rather wait on and pay full price for to make sure he's the real deal this year.
Trade for this week - Taranto to:
A) Pendles - he will lose money in the next few weeks so thinking of holding off
B) Bont - He keeps getting jammy points
C) Selwood - doing well
D) Sloane - too expensive to jump in?
E) Adams - can move him back into defence when it is time to bring in Pendles
Leaning to Adams
Quote from: billnats on April 20, 2017, 11:52:45 PM
Trade for this week - Taranto to:
A) Pendles - he will lose money in the next few weeks so thinking of holding off
B) Bont - He keeps getting jammy points
C) Selwood - doing well
D) Sloane - too expensive to jump in?
E) Adams - can move him back into defence when it is time to bring in Pendles
Leaning to Adams
Sloane looks like he has hit another level! him or Bont for me
Macrae v Hanners.
I have a f/m at m8 so position wise not a big difference.
Quote from: Holz on April 21, 2017, 09:12:38 AM
Macrae v Hanners.
I have a f/m at m8 so position wise not a big difference.
Would go Macrae atm. Wait for Hanners to hit some sort of form before bringing him in.
Quote from: Holz on April 21, 2017, 09:12:38 AM
Macrae v Hanners.
I have a f/m at m8 so position wise not a big difference.
Hanners is about to go huge after GWS this week as the Swans win the next five. Return to that 115 form
Quote from: Holz on April 21, 2017, 09:12:38 AM
Macrae v Hanners.
I have a f/m at m8 so position wise not a big difference.
You would think Hanners will score more overall. Though I like mids scoring as fwds and Macrea likely top 6 fwd
Def upgrade-
Howe v JJ v Lloyd
Petrevski-Seton vs Powell-Pepper vs Swallow
Pick 2 to start on the field this week
Quote from: monga77 on April 21, 2017, 06:34:37 PM
Def upgrade-
Howe v JJ v Lloyd
JJ may score the best this week, but Lloyd looking really good so go with him imo
Lloyd > Howe > JJ
Quote from: jonahfalcond on April 21, 2017, 07:14:51 PM
Petrevski-Seton vs Powell-Pepper vs Swallow
Pick 2 to start on the field this week
Swallow and SPS, but tbh hard to split SPS and SPP. Can you loophole one of them?
Bont v Jelly?
Cant decide between Treloar + 25k or Dmart.
Quote from: Holz on April 25, 2017, 09:21:56 PM
Cant decide between Treloar + 25k or Dmart.
I'm bringing in Treloar this week. Still don't think Martin is consistent enough and Richmond won't keep it up
Quote from: Holz on April 25, 2017, 09:21:56 PM
Cant decide between Treloar + 25k or Dmart.
Treloar I think, reckon he will hit his straps from here and play the way we thought he would
Quote from: jfitty on April 26, 2017, 11:27:02 AM
Quote from: Holz on April 25, 2017, 09:21:56 PM
Cant decide between Treloar + 25k or Dmart.
Treloar I think, reckon he will hit his straps from here and play the way we thought he would
Treloar has a B/e of 113 so can have another look this week if able.
Quote from: Ringo on April 26, 2017, 02:40:18 PM
Quote from: jfitty on April 26, 2017, 11:27:02 AM
Quote from: Holz on April 25, 2017, 09:21:56 PM
Cant decide between Treloar + 25k or Dmart.
Treloar I think, reckon he will hit his straps from here and play the way we thought he would
Treloar has a B/e of 113 so can have another look this week if able.
well i want buddy in next week and actually Dmart has a huge BE so im not going him.
so its more Buddy then Dmart/Treloar or Treloar then Buddy.
Hanners v Bont
Tom Lynch vs Toby Greene vs JJK
Tex or Macrae
Selwood v Bont v Rocky??
Quote from: mzunguman on April 26, 2017, 10:08:16 PM
Selwood v Bont v Rocky??
Selwood, bigger POD, just as good, potentially better.
trade out WHE or Swallow
Sloane v Rocky
Quote from: frenzy on April 26, 2017, 10:29:06 PM
Sloane v Rocky
Tough. Go with the better bye structure
This week then next:
A) Hanners then Dusty
B) Bont then Dusty
C) Hanners then Bont
How would people rank the three?
Martin vs Wines
Quote from: bkimm32 on April 27, 2017, 11:03:48 AM
Martin vs Wines
Dusty has a very high BE just now so because I rate him over Wines, I would wait and get him later
Quote from: Fid on April 26, 2017, 10:58:14 PM
Quote from: frenzy on April 26, 2017, 10:29:06 PM
Sloane v Rocky
Tough. Go with the better bye structure
I feel like Rocky is better value for money for what they should produce from now on. As much as i love Sloaney, can't see him keeping this up.
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on April 27, 2017, 10:55:06 AM
This week then next:
A) Hanners then Dusty
B) Bont then Dusty
C) Hanners then Bont
How would people rank the three?
Would definitely want Bont there, so not A. Maybe go with B after Dusty drops in price more this week.
Quote from: tor01doc on April 27, 2017, 11:06:39 AM
Quote from: bkimm32 on April 27, 2017, 11:03:48 AM
Martin vs Wines
Dusty has a very high BE just now so because I rate him over Wines, I would wait and get him later
Agree with this^
Swallow vs Taranto > Fisher?
Thinking Swallow at this point in the hope Taranto gets more games. But if not, rip.
Buddy vs Greene
Quote from: MontyJnr on April 27, 2017, 02:40:24 PM
Buddy vs Greene
I started with him and am happy.
Looking at Buddy next week IF he goes big this weekend. BE 124.
Quote from: bkimm32 on April 27, 2017, 11:20:39 AM
Swallow vs Taranto > Fisher?
Thinking Swallow at this point in the hope Taranto gets more games. But if not, rip.
Taranto should be back this week and still has a low-ish BE, so I'd trade Swallow
D3 Simpson>LLoyd>Howe>Shaw.
Quote from: crowls on April 27, 2017, 04:05:53 PM
D3 Simpson>LLoyd>Howe>Shaw.
Shaw > Lloyd/Howe > Simpson
Back Shaw to return to form. Cant split Lloyd/Howe.
Quote from: dmac07 on April 27, 2017, 04:39:45 PM
Quote from: crowls on April 27, 2017, 04:05:53 PM
D3 Simpson>LLoyd>Howe>Shaw.
Shaw > Lloyd/Howe > Simpson
Back Shaw to return to form. Cant split Lloyd/Howe.
Gotta back in Simmo surely as well. His record is insane. Can't really go wrong with any of those guys I'd say, but Shaw and Simmo are more proven and have the most upside, so any of those 2 would get my vote now that they're relatively cheap.
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on April 27, 2017, 10:55:06 AM
This week then next:
A) Hanners then Dusty
B) Bont then Dusty
C) Hanners then Bont
How would people rank the three?
C mate
T Lynch v Buddy v J Cameron
Quote from: HoleMeal on April 27, 2017, 06:30:38 PM
T Lynch v Buddy v J Cameron
Lynch>Buddy>Cameron. same order
Quote from: HoleMeal on April 27, 2017, 06:30:38 PM
T Lynch v Buddy v J Cameron
Buddy because Lynch has the bye coming up. Cameron has been great but I can't see him keeping this scoring up for much longer.
Wines vs Hannebery. Take into account Hannerberys bye round sucks for my team.
Quote from: bkimm32 on April 28, 2017, 08:27:36 AM
Wines vs Hannebery. Take into account Hannerberys bye round sucks for my team.
I like as a POD... Still want more from hanners and as you said his bye round isn't great.. give wines a go
Which combo
1) Roughy + Franklin/Yeo OR
2) Parfitt + Selwood/Rocky/Bont
Quote from: mzunguman on April 28, 2017, 08:52:04 AM
Quote from: bkimm32 on April 28, 2017, 08:27:36 AM
Wines vs Hannebery. Take into account Hannerberys bye round sucks for my team.
I like as a POD... Still want more from hanners and as you said his bye round isn't great.. give wines a go
Which combo
1) Roughy + Franklin/Yeo OR
2) Parfitt + Selwood/Rocky/Bont
So many people keep telling me to bring Wines in after his bye, I'd rather get him before it. That gives me enough points before he sits the week and a rookie or dpp covers, then he can go ham while all the other bye rounds are on.
I like the second combo better. More consistent and less injury prone. Probably Selwood.
Couple of trades again this week.
SPS to one of Macrae or Simpson/Shaw via DPPs. Figure Macrae because more options down back for fallen prems. Simmo, Shaw, Rance, plus Montagna, Howe, LLoyd. Macrae will outscore Simmo.
Pickett to Balic/Fisher. Leaning towards Balic for DPP.
Quote from: bkimm32 on April 28, 2017, 08:27:36 AM
Wines vs Hannebery. Take into account Hannerberys bye round sucks for my team.
Either. Lingy said in commentary half way through the Carl game something like only 5 players to the beginning of the round had so many possessions and kicked so many goals....company was elite...Danger, Bont...etc and Wines was one. Kind of gives me the showers because I started him in 2016 expecting something like this but was served up score after score around 85 with lots of butchered ball.
Hanners is cheap as chips and is a great buy. Champion Data love him and if he scores 17/22 100+ scores as he has in receny years then you're laughing as he has nearly had his quota of non 100s already.
Quote from: crowls on April 28, 2017, 10:25:08 AM
Couple of trades again this week.
SPS to one of Macrae or Simpson/Shaw via DPPs. Figure Macrae because more options down back for fallen prems. Simmo, Shaw, Rance, plus Montagna, Howe, LLoyd. Macrae will outscore Simmo.
Pickett to Balic/Fisher. Leaning towards Balic for DPP.
Good logic. My reasons exactly for trading in Macrae this week over Simpson who I initially wanted. Balic for DPP gives him the edge.
Quote from: enzedder on April 28, 2017, 10:39:53 AM
Quote from: crowls on April 28, 2017, 10:25:08 AM
Couple of trades again this week.
SPS to one of Macrae or Simpson/Shaw via DPPs. Figure Macrae because more options down back for fallen prems. Simmo, Shaw, Rance, plus Montagna, Howe, LLoyd. Macrae will outscore Simmo.
Pickett to Balic/Fisher. Leaning towards Balic for DPP.
Good logic. My reasons exactly for trading in Macrae this week over Simpson who I initially wanted. Balic for DPP gives him the edge.
only downside NZ is cannot catch up doing the same as everybody else. Just need a shark move somewhere. Other years have caught the Martin/Gawn mid year ruck train. Just have to wait until the byes and see what outliers I can find. Need Missy, Steele, Stef, to have a couple of great weeks.
Quote from: crowls on April 28, 2017, 10:58:56 AM
Quote from: enzedder on April 28, 2017, 10:39:53 AM
Quote from: crowls on April 28, 2017, 10:25:08 AM
Couple of trades again this week.
SPS to one of Macrae or Simpson/Shaw via DPPs. Figure Macrae because more options down back for fallen prems. Simmo, Shaw, Rance, plus Montagna, Howe, LLoyd. Macrae will outscore Simmo.
Pickett to Balic/Fisher. Leaning towards Balic for DPP.
Good logic. My reasons exactly for trading in Macrae this week over Simpson who I initially wanted. Balic for DPP gives him the edge.
only downside NZ is cannot catch up doing the same as everybody else. Just need a shark move somewhere. Other years have caught the Martin/Gawn mid year ruck train. Just have to wait until the byes and see what outliers I can find. Need Missy, Steele, Stef, to have a couple of great weeks.
I'm all for Missy going bang.
The outliers will be there, it's just a case of picking the right ones.
Roberton at 1% ownership has been a beauty for me.
Miller and Higgins at 5% haven't been so kind as I didn't start with them.
Macrae at 20% isn't exactly popular yet, so he may give you a small leg up in the coming weeks before "everyone" has him.
Quote from: enzedder on April 28, 2017, 11:20:26 AM
Quote from: crowls on April 28, 2017, 10:58:56 AM
Quote from: enzedder on April 28, 2017, 10:39:53 AM
Quote from: crowls on April 28, 2017, 10:25:08 AM
Couple of trades again this week.
SPS to one of Macrae or Simpson/Shaw via DPPs. Figure Macrae because more options down back for fallen prems. Simmo, Shaw, Rance, plus Montagna, Howe, LLoyd. Macrae will outscore Simmo.
Pickett to Balic/Fisher. Leaning towards Balic for DPP.
Good logic. My reasons exactly for trading in Macrae this week over Simpson who I initially wanted. Balic for DPP gives him the edge.
only downside NZ is cannot catch up doing the same as everybody else. Just need a shark move somewhere. Other years have caught the Martin/Gawn mid year ruck train. Just have to wait until the byes and see what outliers I can find. Need Missy, Steele, Stef, to have a couple of great weeks.
I'm all for Missy going bang.
The outliers will be there, it's just a case of picking the right ones.
Roberton at 1% ownership has been a beauty for me.
Miller and Higgins at 5% haven't been so kind as I didn't start with them.
Macrae at 20% isn't exactly popular yet, so he may give you a small leg up in the coming weeks before "everyone" has him.
Taken a close look at Roberton/Lloyd as def options. More inclined to risk them than jump on Heater or Simmo at the moment. Also been keen on Lynch all preseason but his round 9 bye put me off. Will be a fwd upgrade for me soon. appreciate the feedback NZ thanks.[/size]
Gotta trade out one for Balic, who will it be?
Pickett v Florent v Eddy v Barrett
Quote from: My Chumps on April 28, 2017, 01:22:19 PM
Gotta trade out one for Balic, who will it be?
Pickett v Florent v Eddy v Barrett
Florent I reckon
Quote from: GoLions on April 28, 2017, 01:24:57 PM
Quote from: My Chumps on April 28, 2017, 01:22:19 PM
Gotta trade out one for Balic, who will it be?
Pickett v Florent v Eddy v Barrett
Florent I reckon
or Pickett. Eddy and Barret both have -ve BE and could generate cash if they come in.
Quote from: crowls on April 28, 2017, 03:01:39 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 28, 2017, 01:24:57 PM
Quote from: My Chumps on April 28, 2017, 01:22:19 PM
Gotta trade out one for Balic, who will it be?
Pickett v Florent v Eddy v Barrett
Florent I reckon
or Pickett. Eddy and Barret both have -ve BE and could generate cash if they come in.
I reckon Pickett as well. Even if he can get back into the Blues side I think his cash generation potential is pretty ordinary
Toss a coin over Pickett and Florent - both will be slow scorers if they get back in.
Zorko vs Martin vs Pendles vs Neale vs Hanners
Quote from: Jay on April 28, 2017, 07:05:51 PM
Zorko vs Martin vs Pendles vs Neale vs Hanners
If you want a premium right now, Zorko > Martin > Hanners. If not wait for Pendles man, BE of 187.
Hanners vs Treloar?
Quote from: Vinny on April 28, 2017, 07:10:15 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 28, 2017, 07:05:51 PM
Zorko vs Martin vs Pendles vs Neale vs Hanners
If you want a premium right now, Zorko > Martin > Hanners. If not wait for Pendles man, BE of 187.
Hanners vs Treloar?
I'd take Treloar, Hanners doesn't look like having the sort of performance that Treloar did on Tuesday. Beast.
Here's one of my own,
Keep Pickett (Trade Taranto) and get Sloane vs Keep Taranto (Trade Pickett) and get Tom Mitchell?
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 28, 2017, 07:13:16 PM
Quote from: Vinny on April 28, 2017, 07:10:15 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 28, 2017, 07:05:51 PM
Zorko vs Martin vs Pendles vs Neale vs Hanners
If you want a premium right now, Zorko > Martin > Hanners. If not wait for Pendles man, BE of 187.
Hanners vs Treloar?
I'd take Treloar, Hanners doesn't look like having the sort of performance that Treloar did on Tuesday. Beast.
Here's one of my own,
Keep Pickett (Trade Taranto) and get Sloane vs Keep Taranto (Trade Pickett) and get Tom Mitchell?
Get Sloane. He is a top 3 or 4 mid, if you can get him in, you do it :)
Pick 2 to start on the field (One in MID, One in FWD)
Balic (FWD/MID) v Parfitt (FWD/MID) v SPP (MID) v Fisher (MID)
Quote from: Jay on April 28, 2017, 07:15:39 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 28, 2017, 07:13:16 PM
Quote from: Vinny on April 28, 2017, 07:10:15 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 28, 2017, 07:05:51 PM
Zorko vs Martin vs Pendles vs Neale vs Hanners
If you want a premium right now, Zorko > Martin > Hanners. If not wait for Pendles man, BE of 187.
Hanners vs Treloar?
I'd take Treloar, Hanners doesn't look like having the sort of performance that Treloar did on Tuesday. Beast.
Here's one of my own,
Keep Pickett (Trade Taranto) and get Sloane vs Keep Taranto (Trade Pickett) and get Tom Mitchell?
Get Sloane. He is a top 3 or 4 mid, if you can get him in, you do it :)
Crazy to pay that much for Sloane. He did this a few seasons back and then tanked. Will probably end up being 110-115.
Greene v nank?
Seriously is he that important to have? Over Greene?
Quote from: backpocket on April 28, 2017, 08:13:30 PM
Seriously is he that important to have? Over Greene?
Nank is averaging 112, is still under 500k and has a mortgage on ruck duties at Richmond. Think back to Maric's debut season and you have a pretty accurate prognosis. Greene has started exceptionally well but an AA guensey & club B&F wasn't enough to see him nudge over 100. He doesn't have the consistency of a pure midfielder either.
Butler vs Parfitt vs WHE vs Black
pick 2 for the fwds
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 28, 2017, 08:28:19 PM
Butler vs Parfitt vs WHE vs Black vs Balic
pick 2 for the fwds
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 28, 2017, 08:28:19 PM
Butler vs Parfitt vs WHE vs Black
pick 2 for the fwds
not exactly sure what your asking. To trade? To field?
if asking who to field id pick both Butler and WHE because they have both been reliable to score over 50 and have the potential to score high. Meanwhile Parfitt normally scores in the 50s and Black has only played one game
who should i get? Hibberd v Greene v Yeo v a player under 503k
thanks in advance
Quote from: Bully on April 28, 2017, 07:27:09 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 28, 2017, 07:15:39 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 28, 2017, 07:13:16 PM
Quote from: Vinny on April 28, 2017, 07:10:15 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 28, 2017, 07:05:51 PM
Zorko vs Martin vs Pendles vs Neale vs Hanners
If you want a premium right now, Zorko > Martin > Hanners. If not wait for Pendles man, BE of 187.
Hanners vs Treloar?
I'd take Treloar, Hanners doesn't look like having the sort of performance that Treloar did on Tuesday. Beast.
Here's one of my own,
Keep Pickett (Trade Taranto) and get Sloane vs Keep Taranto (Trade Pickett) and get Tom Mitchell?
Get Sloane. He is a top 3 or 4 mid, if you can get him in, you do it :)
Crazy to pay that much for Sloane. He did this a few seasons back and then tanked. Will probably end up being 110-115.
Hung on to Taranto, looks like it has gone well with a quarter to play :)
Quote from: jonahfalcond on April 28, 2017, 07:17:32 PM
Pick 2 to start on the field (One in MID, One in FWD)
Balic (FWD/MID) v Parfitt (FWD/MID) v SPP (MID) v Fisher (MID)
Parfitt and SPP
Balic and Jelwood vs Buddy and SPP?
Getting Jelwood means I will have 7 mid premos incl Beams and JOM at M8, but does weaken fwd line and play Balic/Parfitt and Butler at F5 & F6. Then get Black next week and either EVW/McNeice/Mexican.
Or is it better to get Buddy this week and Balic but means playing SPP. Thoughts?
Balic this week Vs Black next week
What is everyone's take on Blake Hardwick (FWD - $123k) from Hawthorn?
on the bubble this week with two scores of mid 60s so far.
Balic seems to be the #1 target this week not sure why there is nearly no talk of Hardwick at all, is his JS wobbly?
Eddy or Pickett to Balic
Or hold the trade and downgrade one of them next week for a safer rookie?
Quote from: miamis_finest on April 29, 2017, 12:02:04 PM
Eddy or Pickett to Balic
Or hold the trade and downgrade one of them next week for a safer rookie?
Who are the safer rookies?
Quote from: Gigantor on April 29, 2017, 12:03:31 PM
Quote from: miamis_finest on April 29, 2017, 12:02:04 PM
Eddy or Pickett to Balic
Or hold the trade and downgrade one of them next week for a safer rookie?
Who are the safer rookies?
lol, yeah I wouldn't mind knowing that too
Quote from: Gigantor on April 29, 2017, 12:03:31 PM
Quote from: miamis_finest on April 29, 2017, 12:02:04 PM
Eddy or Pickett to Balic
Or hold the trade and downgrade one of them next week for a safer rookie?
Who are the safer rookies?
Aaron Black if he plays well this week (think that would give him another 3 weeks if he kicked 2-3 goals this weekend, EVW etc.
Quote from: djbics on April 29, 2017, 12:16:32 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on April 29, 2017, 12:03:31 PM
Quote from: miamis_finest on April 29, 2017, 12:02:04 PM
Eddy or Pickett to Balic
Or hold the trade and downgrade one of them next week for a safer rookie?
Who are the safer rookies?
lol, yeah I wouldn't mind knowing that too
Anyway would you trade Pickett or Eddy out for Balic? Thanks.
Quote from: miamis_finest on April 29, 2017, 12:18:17 PM
Quote from: djbics on April 29, 2017, 12:16:32 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on April 29, 2017, 12:03:31 PM
Quote from: miamis_finest on April 29, 2017, 12:02:04 PM
Eddy or Pickett to Balic
Or hold the trade and downgrade one of them next week for a safer rookie?
Who are the safer rookies?
lol, yeah I wouldn't mind knowing that too
Anyway would you trade Pickett or Eddy out for Balic? Thanks.
I'm trading Eddy, yes he has more money to make over Pickett but I cant see him getting back into Ports side, Pickett's DPP gives you more flexibility to move him around irregardless of whether he plays.
FWIW I think they both need to go soon anyway
Quote from: djbics on April 29, 2017, 12:23:47 PM
Quote from: miamis_finest on April 29, 2017, 12:18:17 PM
Quote from: djbics on April 29, 2017, 12:16:32 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on April 29, 2017, 12:03:31 PM
Quote from: miamis_finest on April 29, 2017, 12:02:04 PM
Eddy or Pickett to Balic
Or hold the trade and downgrade one of them next week for a safer rookie?
Who are the safer rookies?
lol, yeah I wouldn't mind knowing that too
Anyway would you trade Pickett or Eddy out for Balic? Thanks.
I'm trading Eddy, yes he has more money to make over Pickett but I cant see him getting back into Ports side, Pickett's DPP gives you more flexibility to move him around irregardless of whether he plays.
FWIW I think they both need to go soon anyway
Appreciate it bud, and yeah Pickett stinks. Plenty of opportunities and can't get over 50.
Dusty + 70k v Jelwood
trade out marchbank or hampton
also, trade in yeo or hibberd
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 30, 2017, 10:34:11 PM
trade out marchbank or hampton
also, trade in yeo or hibberd
J.Lloyd v Z.Williams v K.Simpson v M.Hibberd
Have two spots left in the backline, one is for Adams, the other for one of the above.
Who is the best keeper? Already have Doch, Liard, Shaw, Tuohy
Quote from: dmac07 on May 01, 2017, 01:25:10 AM
J.Lloyd v Z.Williams v K.Simpson v M.Hibberd
Have two spots left in the backline, one is for Adams, the other for one of the above.
Who is the best keeper? Already have Doch, Liard, Shaw, Tuohy
Simpson IMO.
I'm grabbing him this week at his bargain price. 8)
Hibberd v Heeney.
There is also a window for Sloane here but wanted to see everyones thoughts.
I think hibbers will average 90 to 110. Good numbers for defence.
Heeney on the bubble and given his free licence could average the 110
Thoughts
Quote from: TableKing on May 01, 2017, 01:43:31 AM
Hibberd v Heeney.
There is also a window for Sloane here but wanted to see everyones thoughts.
I think hibbers will average 90 to 110. Good numbers for defence.
Heeney on the bubble and given his free licence could average the 110
Thoughts
No way will either average 110 IMO.
90 for each if you are lucky.
Which combo will score more this week do you reckon?
Simpson, Butler, Houston
Or
Higgins, Marchbank, Hampton
Can't work out if I need the Simpson upgrade up back or Higgins upgrade up forward with Nank out? ???
For what it is worth
Simpson 94
Butler 60
Houston 65
Total 213
Higgins 95
Matchbank 70
Hampton 60
Total 225
Quote from: Ringo on May 01, 2017, 06:44:39 PM
For what it is worth
Simpson 94
Butler 60
Houston 65
Total 213
Higgins 95
Matchbank 70
Hampton 60
Total 225
Not much in it going by that! Hah!
Hampton is the wildcard. He can throw in a 40 or a ton :o
Maybe getting Simpson in this week and then see how Higgins goes against the Crows before deciding if I should bring him back in or not? ;D
Quote from: TableKing on May 01, 2017, 01:43:31 AM
Hibberd v Heeney.
There is also a window for Sloane here but wanted to see everyones thoughts.
I think hibbers will average 90 to 110. Good numbers for defence.
Heeney on the bubble and given his free licence could average the 110
Thoughts
I'm having the same dilemma.
At the moment Hibberd is just infront
Quote from: backpocket on April 28, 2017, 07:49:49 PM
Greene v nank?
Was catching up on this thread and at first didn't realise this was posted last Friday :o
Quote from: Mark on May 01, 2017, 06:56:45 PM
Quote from: TableKing on May 01, 2017, 01:43:31 AM
Hibberd v Heeney.
There is also a window for Sloane here but wanted to see everyones thoughts.
I think hibbers will average 90 to 110. Good numbers for defence.
Heeney on the bubble and given his free licence could average the 110
Thoughts
I'm having the same dilemma.
At the moment Hibberd is just infront
I would be a bit worried about Heeney and his glandular fever
When I was a boy, I had it and couldn't play VFL
Quote from: tor01doc on May 01, 2017, 08:34:59 PM
Quote from: Mark on May 01, 2017, 06:56:45 PM
Quote from: TableKing on May 01, 2017, 01:43:31 AM
Hibberd v Heeney.
There is also a window for Sloane here but wanted to see everyones thoughts.
I think hibbers will average 90 to 110. Good numbers for defence.
Heeney on the bubble and given his free licence could average the 110
Thoughts
I'm having the same dilemma.
At the moment Hibberd is just infront
I would be a bit worried about Heeney and his glandular fever
When I was a boy, I had it and couldn't play VFL
I had a bad cough one time and wasn't able to make it into the AFL after that :'(
I feel your pain
EVW versus McNiece
Mainly concerned about JS so please enlighten me as to whose knocking on the door.
Quote from: Bully on May 01, 2017, 11:43:32 PM
EVW versus McNiece
Mainly concerned about JS so please enlighten me as to whose knocking on the door.
I'd go the cheaper option in McNiece plus I think he will be a better scorer long term.
Also older too which means more mature body.
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 02, 2017, 12:00:11 AM
Quote from: Bully on May 01, 2017, 11:43:32 PM
EVW versus McNiece
Mainly concerned about JS so please enlighten me as to whose knocking on the door.
I'd go the cheaper option in McNiece plus I think he will be a better scorer long term.
Also older too which means more mature body.
Yep, that was my thinking. 24 y/o versus 21 y/0. Can't think of anyone in line to replace him either. If Myers comes in and he retains his spot then that's the way I'll go.
Quote from: Bully on May 02, 2017, 12:05:48 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 02, 2017, 12:00:11 AM
Quote from: Bully on May 01, 2017, 11:43:32 PM
EVW versus McNiece
Mainly concerned about JS so please enlighten me as to whose knocking on the door.
I'd go the cheaper option in McNiece plus I think he will be a better scorer long term.
Also older too which means more mature body.
Yep, that was my thinking. 24 y/o versus 21 y/0. Can't think of anyone in line to replace him either. If Myers comes in and he retains his spot then that's the way I'll go.
Might even pick him up myself next week if he has a good game this week despite the price rise.
Don't think his JS will be an issue like you said.
Yeo v Higgins
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 02, 2017, 12:07:19 AM
Quote from: Bully on May 02, 2017, 12:05:48 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 02, 2017, 12:00:11 AM
Quote from: Bully on May 01, 2017, 11:43:32 PM
EVW versus McNiece
Mainly concerned about JS so please enlighten me as to whose knocking on the door.
I'd go the cheaper option in McNiece plus I think he will be a better scorer long term.
Also older too which means more mature body.
Yep, that was my thinking. 24 y/o versus 21 y/0. Can't think of anyone in line to replace him either. If Myers comes in and he retains his spot then that's the way I'll go.
Might even pick him up myself next week if he has a good game this week despite the price rise.
Don't think his JS will be an issue like you said.
EVW has a much better bye though
Michael Hibberd (BE-22) v Heeney (BE - 75)
I know Hibberd has the better BE but i feel Heeney has greater potential to score. Mentioned in a previous post, Heeney will float through the midfield this season. Sydney are terrible but surely they cant continue.
Thoughts?
Quote from: TableKing on May 02, 2017, 01:22:03 PM
Michael Hibberd (BE-22) v Heeney (BE - 75)
I know Hibberd has the better BE but i feel Heeney has greater potential to score. Mentioned in a previous post, Heeney will float through the midfield this season. Sydney are terrible but surely they cant continue.
Thoughts?
Well, if you want both, then grab Hibberd this week and Heeney next week (assuming you have the cash to do so).
If you just want one, I guess I'd go for Heeney as he could end up closer to top 6-10 fwds than Hibberd will with the top 6-10 defenders.
Quote from: brudski on May 02, 2017, 01:23:52 AM
Yeo v Higgins
I'm biased because I have Higgins and love the way he plays. Slight injury risk however, have already been caught out with his late withdrawl. Spoke to my Eagles mate on Sunday and he won't be touching Yeo this year, reckons he'll moved around the park to suit the circumstances. This could be terribly frustrating. Higgins is also a lot cheaper, at worst he becomes a very handy F7 (and I reckon we'll all need one this year).
Quote from: Bully on May 02, 2017, 02:39:42 PM
Quote from: brudski on May 02, 2017, 01:23:52 AM
Yeo v Higgins
I'm biased because I have Higgins and love the way he plays. Slight injury risk however, have already been caught out with his late withdrawl. Spoke to my Eagles mate on Sunday and he won't be touching Yeo this year, reckons he'll moved around the park to suit the circumstances. This could be terribly frustrating. Higgins is also a lot cheaper, at worst he becomes a very handy F7 (and I reckon we'll all need one this year).
2 good scores, 1 poor score, miss and repeat. Can score but would have to be brave.
Quote from: brudski on May 02, 2017, 01:23:52 AM
Yeo v Higgins
Tough one, I have both because I love living life on the edge.
Yeo has the ceiling, but I feel like Higgins will be more consistent over the year. Although he has had a few poor scores Missy is by far North's best kick and should see plenty of midfield time.
I'd go Higgins purely because he's cheaper, but Yeo is definitely looking solid this early in the season.
Quote from: dmac07 on May 02, 2017, 03:39:32 PM
Quote from: Bully on May 02, 2017, 02:39:42 PM
Quote from: brudski on May 02, 2017, 01:23:52 AM
Yeo v Higgins
I'm biased because I have Higgins and love the way he plays. Slight injury risk however, have already been caught out with his late withdrawl. Spoke to my Eagles mate on Sunday and he won't be touching Yeo this year, reckons he'll moved around the park to suit the circumstances. This could be terribly frustrating. Higgins is also a lot cheaper, at worst he becomes a very handy F7 (and I reckon we'll all need one this year).
2 good scores, 1 poor score, miss and repeat. Can score but would have to be brave.
3 tons out of 5 is a good strike rate. Also has 2 twenty game seasons to his credit in 2014/15. For 444k is a decent bet.
Quote from: Bully on May 02, 2017, 06:51:50 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on May 02, 2017, 03:39:32 PM
Quote from: Bully on May 02, 2017, 02:39:42 PM
Quote from: brudski on May 02, 2017, 01:23:52 AM
Yeo v Higgins
I'm biased because I have Higgins and love the way he plays. Slight injury risk however, have already been caught out with his late withdrawl. Spoke to my Eagles mate on Sunday and he won't be touching Yeo this year, reckons he'll moved around the park to suit the circumstances. This could be terribly frustrating. Higgins is also a lot cheaper, at worst he becomes a very handy F7 (and I reckon we'll all need one this year).
If he is on the park, he generally scores well.
2 good scores, 1 poor score, miss and repeat. Can score but would have to be brave.
3 tons out of 5 is a good strike rate. Also has 2 twenty game seasons to his credit in 2014/15. For 444k is a decent bet.
Agree with this. If he is on the field, he will score well.
Shaw and Stef vs Roberton and Goldy/Grundy
Feel like option one is safer, but really want Roberton!
Quote from: jfitty on May 03, 2017, 10:18:30 PM
Shaw and Stef vs Roberton and Goldy/Grundy
Feel like option one is safer, but really want Roberton!
[/quote
Option 1 for me. ;)
Quote from: jfitty on May 03, 2017, 10:18:30 PM
Shaw and Stef vs Roberton and Goldy/Grundy
Feel like option one is safer, but really want Roberton!
Definitely option one
Quote from: jfitty on May 03, 2017, 10:18:30 PM
Shaw and Stef vs Roberton and Goldy/Grundy
Feel like option one is safer, but really want Roberton!
JF option 2 with Grundy is a great POD option. No guts no glory.
Heeney vs Steele
Quote from: MontyJnr on May 04, 2017, 12:43:51 AM
Heeney vs Steele
not sure, already have steele and will look at Heeney depending on available funds
Dustin Martin vs Pendles vs Tmitch or should i disregard the round 11 bye and bring in bont or oliver
Quote from: NickyBoy on May 04, 2017, 03:09:56 PM
Dustin Martin vs Pendles vs Tmitch or should i disregard the round 11 bye and bring in bont or oliver
Pendles for sure out of those 3, especially at his price.
Docherty vs Selwood vs Dusty.
Have 3 back premos so far and 7 mid premos but one of them is Beams who is injured so will be trading him out.
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 04, 2017, 03:19:44 PM
Docherty vs Selwood vs Dusty.
Have 3 back premos so far and 7 mid premos but one of them is Beams who is injured so will be trading him out.
Docherty this week. He doesn't look like slowing down.
Let Jelwood and Dusty dip a little more.
Quote from: Huttabito on May 04, 2017, 03:37:24 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 04, 2017, 03:19:44 PM
Docherty vs Selwood vs Dusty.
Have 3 back premos so far and 7 mid premos but one of them is Beams who is injured so will be trading him out.
Docherty this week. He doesn't look like slowing down.
Let Jelwood and Dusty dip a little more.
Cheers mate.
Pretty keen on Doc, never had him in SC before (Simpson instead of Doc last year)
Can always grab a mid next week like you said once they have dipped in price more (Selwood and Dusty)
Quote from: Huttabito on May 04, 2017, 03:37:24 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 04, 2017, 03:19:44 PM
Docherty vs Selwood vs Dusty.
Have 3 back premos so far and 7 mid premos but one of them is Beams who is injured so will be trading him out.
Docherty this week. He doesn't look like slowing down.
Let Jelwood and Dusty dip a little more.
I have the same toss-up and I'm going with Docherty as well. His scoring doesn't suffer too much when Carlton get beaten comfortably, and also has a very nice ceiling. It seems crazy to say this but at this stage he's probably safer than the other two
EVW v Melican?! Need to downgrade in defence
Trading Beams and had 73k in the bank..... should I go Ebert (POD), Dusty, or Yeo via DPP??
Doing this for the bye situation coming up as well
Ranked 2536 btw :)
Pendles vx Neale
Quote from: whynot102 on May 04, 2017, 09:57:09 PM
Pendles vx Neale
Pendles for me, almost at his cheapest price
Quote from: EazyMoney on May 04, 2017, 10:29:04 PM
Quote from: fuzeski on May 04, 2017, 10:23:42 PM
Quote from: whynot102 on May 04, 2017, 09:57:09 PM
Pendles vx Neale
Pendles for me, almost at his cheapest price
Yep, definitely Pendles.
As much as I love Neale (as a Freo supporter). This one is a no brainer. Dependlebery.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 04, 2017, 10:44:22 PM
Quote from: EazyMoney on May 04, 2017, 10:29:04 PM
Quote from: fuzeski on May 04, 2017, 10:23:42 PM
Quote from: whynot102 on May 04, 2017, 09:57:09 PM
Pendles vx Neale
Pendles for me, almost at his cheapest price
Yep, definitely Pendles.
Dependlebury.
Simpson v Hibberd v Downgrade (Parsons)
As much as I love Neale (as a Freo supporter). This one is a no brainer. Dependlebery.
Quote from: mzunguman on May 04, 2017, 09:52:19 PM
Trading Beams and had 73k in the bank..... should I go Ebert (POD), Dusty, or Yeo via DPP??
Doing this for the bye situation coming up as well
Ranked 2536 btw :)
You're not gonna be ranked 2536th if you make decisions like trading in Ebert, come on now
Quote from: john23132 on May 04, 2017, 10:51:57 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 04, 2017, 09:52:19 PM
Trading Beams and had 73k in the bank..... should I go Ebert (POD), Dusty, or Yeo via DPP??
Doing this for the bye situation coming up as well
Ranked 2536 btw :)
You're not gonna be ranked 2536th if you make decisions like trading in Ebert, come on now
Just trying to think outside the box :o ;D
Like most of us I will have a donut because of Beams.
So to cover him I am trading out Pickett and can afford any mid $585k and below.
To I get Adams or Pendles this week? Can move Adams into DEF next week when I trade out Hampton.
Adams vs Pendles
Current team
(http://i.imgur.com/QP2E8MC.png)
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 05, 2017, 10:26:30 AM
Like most of us I will have a donut because of Beams.
So to cover him I am trading out Pickett and can afford any mid $585k and below.
To I get Adams or Pendles this week? Can move Adams into DEF next week when I trade out Hampton.
Adams vs Pendles
Current team
(http://i.imgur.com/QP2E8MC.png)
Pendles. Don't think you will get him any cheaper than this week. Apparently last 3 average against the Blues is 144 as well.
Pendles is only $30k more than Adams, he won't up too much as his BE is 123 but has a great avg vs Blues and you can always pick up Adams next week for Hampton if McNeice plays next week.
Similar has been done but anyways
Buddy v Heeney v Higgins v Steele
Who goes for Shaw?
Marchbank, Hampton, Stewart, Newman?
Quote from: B. on May 05, 2017, 02:57:57 PM
Who goes for Shaw?
Marchbank, Hampton, Stewart, Newman?
Stewart's dropped and Newman not far behind, so Stewart.
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on May 04, 2017, 06:52:30 PM
Quote from: Huttabito on May 04, 2017, 03:37:24 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 04, 2017, 03:19:44 PM
Docherty vs Selwood vs Dusty.
Have 3 back premos so far and 7 mid premos but one of them is Beams who is injured so will be trading him out.
Docherty this week. He doesn't look like slowing down.
Let Jelwood and Dusty dip a little more.
I have the same toss-up and I'm going with Docherty as well. His scoring doesn't suffer too much when Carlton get beaten comfortably, and also has a very nice ceiling. It seems crazy to say this but at this stage he's probably safer than the other two
Same 3 to choose from and getting Dusty.
Have to play 3 out of Butler, Houston, Barret, Parsons... cant loophole. Which one of these superstars do I leave out?
Quote from: dmac07 on May 05, 2017, 07:16:27 PM
Have to play 3 out of Butler, Houston, Barret, Parsons... cant loophole. Which one of these superstars do I leave out?
Barrett
Please help:
Newman and Beams to ...
Docherty and Parson - Parsons starts on field
or
Pendles and EVW - EVW loopholing with Hampton
Quote from: benny_fraz on May 05, 2017, 07:42:31 PM
Please help:
Newman and Beams to ...
Docherty and Parson - Parsons starts on field
or
Pendles and EVW - EVW loopholing with Hampton
Goldstein or Martin?
Saving 60-70k, I think Martin might average slightly more, what do people think?
Quote from: miamis_finest on May 05, 2017, 08:11:29 PM
Goldstein or Martin?
Saving 60-70k, I think Martin might average slightly more, what do people think?
Martin. Goldy scoring poorly and can't trust North. Preuss could come back.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 05, 2017, 08:26:28 PM
Quote from: miamis_finest on May 05, 2017, 08:11:29 PM
Goldstein or Martin?
Saving 60-70k, I think Martin might average slightly more, what do people think?
Martin. Goldy scoring poorly and can't trust North. Preuss could come back.
Yeah exact thoughts. Unless you can suggest any rucking alternatives also.
Upgrading this week to one of these players.
C. Oliver vs Ward vs Sidebottom vs Parker
Who do people think will score the most from here?
Some players are pretty cheap at the moment... but they have not started well...
Quote from: bunyips on May 05, 2017, 08:42:23 PM
Upgrading this week to one of these players.
C. Oliver vs Ward vs Sidebottom vs Parker
Who do people think will score the most from here?
Some players are pretty cheap at the moment... but they have not started well...
Oliver.
The most consistent out of the lot too.
Thanks juddmajic.
Yeah that's my current chioce.
Wards had a good start! Always the way...
Quote from: bunyips on May 05, 2017, 09:23:30 PM
Thanks juddmajic.
Yeah that's my current chioce.
Wards had a good start! Always the way...
You'll be happy with the Oliver pick.
Kids a gun and future SC star in the making.
Would you people go Butler > Yeo or Otten > Roberton? Yeo would finish off my forward line however leaves me with Otten, Marchbank and Williamson on field in defence.
Yeo vs Ebert vs JPK vs Kelly vs Dusty, got 541k in the bank
Quote from: TexR74 on May 08, 2017, 08:38:40 PM
Yeo vs Ebert vs JPK vs Kelly vs Dusty, got 541k in the bank
Ebert not this week with a bye next week, Kelly not a top mid. Dusty dodgy of late in SuperCoach. Yeo is playing the role and has the right bye so that's my opinion :) JPK a good option but maybe a Round 12 upgrade target??
Quote from: TexR74 on May 08, 2017, 08:38:40 PM
Yeo vs Ebert vs JPK vs Kelly vs Dusty, got 541k in the bank
Ebert bad bye
JPK high BE
Dusty gone cold
Kelly not top top shelf
Guess that leaves one
This one is doing my head in...
Yeo vs. Doch?
Would end up with same rookies on the field either way. Figured if I get Yeo can get Doc/Danger next week but not the other way around. Would complete my forwards too...
Def (with Doch):
Doch, Laird, Simpson, Shaw, Otten, Stewart, Newman, McNiece (Adams and McGrath temporarily in the mids)
Forwards (with Yeo):
Yeo, Dahl, Macrae, Nankervis, Higgins, Steele, Parsons, Eddy
Beams to Elite Mid
or Trade in Hampton for McNiece for some cash?
Beams is going regardless just a matter of what week and whats more important.
Quote from: TableKing on May 09, 2017, 04:47:07 PM
Beams to Elite Mid
or Trade in Hampton for McNiece for some cash?
Beams is going regardless just a matter of what week and whats more important.
Well, Beams may be back next week. So either you trade Beams this week or you hold until he returns, whenever that may be (unless the Lions come out and say it'll be another month or something).
Quote from: SilverLion on May 09, 2017, 10:41:58 AM
This one is doing my head in...
Yeo vs. Doch?
Would end up with same rookies on the field either way. Figured if I get Yeo can get Doc/Danger next week but not the other way around. Would complete my forwards too...
Def (with Doch):
Doch, Laird, Simpson, Shaw, Otten, Stewart, Newman, McNiece (Adams and McGrath temporarily in the mids)
Forwards (with Yeo):
Yeo, Dahl, Macrae, Nankervis, Higgins, Steele, Parsons, Eddy
Would like a few responses on this myself.
Doch v Yeo v Buddy my choices
Yeo and Buddy projected to rise considerably in cash.
Doch more expensive but price will remain steady in all likelihood.
Doch gives 4 keepers in defence... Doch, Laird, Roberton, Shaw, Otten, Marchbank (McGrath, Newman)
Yeo or Buddy would complete my fwd set up...Yeo/Buddy, Dahl, Macrae, Nank, Higgins, Miller (Parsons, Eddy)
Id take Doc over Yeo personally excluding other aspects, but if you need to R12 bye id take Yeo.
Zak Jones $ 462,200 (BE 34) V Jason Johannisen $ 469,400 (BE 101)
Both have the same bye rounds
Take Doch, what's his lowest score, 91?
Quote from: Fid on May 10, 2017, 08:30:53 PM
Zak Jones $ 462,200 (BE 34) V Jason Johannisen $ 469,400 (BE 101)
Both have the same bye rounds
Zak Jones for me.
I think his role won't change and will give you a nice POD.
Shaw vs Williams
Yeo vs Buddy?
LLoyd & WHE
VS
Yeo & Otten
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Yeo vs JJK??
Round 12 bye fwd is a good idea, not sure I trust Yeo to keep it up, not sure I trust JJK cos he's a KPP :P
Any other round 12 suggestions will be considered haha
Quote from: GCSkiwi on May 11, 2017, 01:24:41 PM
Yeo vs JJK??
Round 12 bye fwd is a good idea, not sure I trust Yeo to keep it up, not sure I trust JJK cos he's a KPP :P
Any other round 12 suggestions will be considered haha
I went with JJK before last week. Thinking now I should have went Yeo!
Shaw vs Z.Williams
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Treloar wasn't out the whole of last year. He stays for me.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Even if Beams was out for 10 weeks I'd still trade out Troll Trelolar. 8)
So glad to finally flower him off this week. Should have done it ages ago like I had planned to. ::)
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 11, 2017, 09:08:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Even if Beams was out for 10 weeks I'd still trade out Troll Trelolar. 8)
So glad to finally flower him off this week. Should have done it ages ago like I had planned to. ::)
Haha! I was expecting something like this from you JM! You've been posting everywhere about how happy you are to trade him out. Trying to convince yourself?.
Don't get me wrong, I've got the showers big time with him, like all of us. BUT, I'm going to have to hold him. Still could turn it around. Money/rookies for upgrades will be very hard to find this year it seems. A trade saved hopefully. Or he bleeds more cash and kills me. So be it.
Beams is injury prone and calves can drag on for ever. Hasn't shown he can attain his past form.
Time to be conservative. One trade only this week. Beams to Bont. Leaves my mids as Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Hanners, Treloar and SPP.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 09:46:38 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 11, 2017, 09:08:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Even if Beams was out for 10 weeks I'd still trade out Troll Trelolar. 8)
So glad to finally flower him off this week. Should have done it ages ago like I had planned to. ::)
Haha! I was expecting something like this from you JM! You've been posting everywhere about how happy you are to trade him out. Trying to convince yourself?.
Don't get me wrong, I've got the showers big time with him, like all of us. BUT, I'm going to have to hold him. Still could turn it around. Money/rookies for upgrades will be very hard to find this year it seems. A trade saved hopefully. Or he bleeds more cash and kills me. So be it.
Beams is injury prone and calves can drag on for ever. Hasn't shown he can attain his past form.
Time to be conservative. One trade only this week. Beams to Bont. Leaves my mids as Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Hanners, Treloar and SPP.
Who injured their calf?
Dusty or ZMerrett?
Quote from: GoLions on May 11, 2017, 09:48:22 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 09:46:38 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 11, 2017, 09:08:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Even if Beams was out for 10 weeks I'd still trade out Troll Trelolar. 8)
So glad to finally flower him off this week. Should have done it ages ago like I had planned to. ::)
Haha! I was expecting something like this from you JM! You've been posting everywhere about how happy you are to trade him out. Trying to convince yourself?.
Don't get me wrong, I've got the showers big time with him, like all of us. BUT, I'm going to have to hold him. Still could turn it around. Money/rookies for upgrades will be very hard to find this year it seems. A trade saved hopefully. Or he bleeds more cash and kills me. So be it.
Beams is injury prone and calves can drag on for ever. Hasn't shown he can attain his past form.
Time to be conservative. One trade only this week. Beams to Bont. Leaves my mids as Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Hanners, Treloar and SPP.
Who injured their calf?
Sorry, my bad. Quad. Stand by my argument though.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 10:09:03 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 11, 2017, 09:48:22 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 09:46:38 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 11, 2017, 09:08:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Even if Beams was out for 10 weeks I'd still trade out Troll Trelolar. 8)
So glad to finally flower him off this week. Should have done it ages ago like I had planned to. ::)
Haha! I was expecting something like this from you JM! You've been posting everywhere about how happy you are to trade him out. Trying to convince yourself?.
Don't get me wrong, I've got the showers big time with him, like all of us. BUT, I'm going to have to hold him. Still could turn it around. Money/rookies for upgrades will be very hard to find this year it seems. A trade saved hopefully. Or he bleeds more cash and kills me. So be it.
Beams is injury prone and calves can drag on for ever. Hasn't shown he can attain his past form.
Time to be conservative. One trade only this week. Beams to Bont. Leaves my mids as Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Hanners, Treloar and SPP.
Who injured their calf?
Sorry, my bad. Quad. Stand by my argument though.
Looking like playing next week fwiw. And was averaging like 105ish iirc before getting injured. I'm holding myself, but can understand why people would trade :P
Quote from: GoLions on May 11, 2017, 10:11:45 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 10:09:03 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 11, 2017, 09:48:22 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 09:46:38 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 11, 2017, 09:08:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Even if Beams was out for 10 weeks I'd still trade out Troll Trelolar. 8)
So glad to finally flower him off this week. Should have done it ages ago like I had planned to. ::)
Haha! I was expecting something like this from you JM! You've been posting everywhere about how happy you are to trade him out. Trying to convince yourself?.
Don't get me wrong, I've got the showers big time with him, like all of us. BUT, I'm going to have to hold him. Still could turn it around. Money/rookies for upgrades will be very hard to find this year it seems. A trade saved hopefully. Or he bleeds more cash and kills me. So be it.
Beams is injury prone and calves can drag on for ever. Hasn't shown he can attain his past form.
Time to be conservative. One trade only this week. Beams to Bont. Leaves my mids as Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Hanners, Treloar and SPP.
Who injured their calf?
Sorry, my bad. Quad. Stand by my argument though.
Looking like playing next week fwiw. And was averaging like 105ish iirc before getting injured. I'm holding myself, but can understand why people would trade :P
Yeah, his last game dropped his average. Haven't heard anything new about next week, only that the Lions would reevaluate his injury after two weeks. But I'll take your word for it GL. You would know more than me.
Hmm, not sure Beams will be a keeper, but Treloar could. This is doing my head in!
Heath Shaw vs Zac Williams
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 09:46:38 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 11, 2017, 09:08:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Even if Beams was out for 10 weeks I'd still trade out Troll Trelolar. 8)
So glad to finally flower him off this week. Should have done it ages ago like I had planned to. ::)
Haha! I was expecting something like this from you JM! You've been posting everywhere about how happy you are to trade him out. Trying to convince yourself?.
Don't get me wrong, I've got the showers big time with him, like all of us. BUT, I'm going to have to hold him. Still could turn it around. Money/rookies for upgrades will be very hard to find this year it seems. A trade saved hopefully. Or he bleeds more cash and kills me. So be it.
Beams is injury prone and calves can drag on for ever. Hasn't shown he can attain his past form.
Time to be conservative. One trade only this week. Beams to Bont. Leaves my mids as Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Hanners, Treloar and SPP.
Treloars cost me cash league wins mate so that's why I am even more furious with him. >:(
The old me would have traded him out 4 weeks ago so I'm amazed that I have held onto him for this long. ;D
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 12, 2017, 01:50:14 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 09:46:38 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 11, 2017, 09:08:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2017, 11:57:43 AM
Trade out Treloar or Beams?
Treloar- $525k
96 average
163 BE
Beams- $477k
96 average.
113 BE.
Looking at the stats, you would say Treloar has to go.
I suppose it comes down to how long Beams will be out and do we trust Treloar to improve?
Even if Beams was out for 10 weeks I'd still trade out Troll Trelolar. 8)
So glad to finally flower him off this week. Should have done it ages ago like I had planned to. ::)
Haha! I was expecting something like this from you JM! You've been posting everywhere about how happy you are to trade him out. Trying to convince yourself?.
Don't get me wrong, I've got the showers big time with him, like all of us. BUT, I'm going to have to hold him. Still could turn it around. Money/rookies for upgrades will be very hard to find this year it seems. A trade saved hopefully. Or he bleeds more cash and kills me. So be it.
Beams is injury prone and calves can drag on for ever. Hasn't shown he can attain his past form.
Time to be conservative. One trade only this week. Beams to Bont. Leaves my mids as Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Bont, Fyfe, Hanners, Treloar and SPP.
Treloars cost me cash league wins mate so that's why I am even more furious with him. >:(
The old me would have traded him out 4 weeks ago so I'm amazed that I have held onto him for this long. ;D
I might just ditch them both, gray Bont and Yeo and be done with it!
Treloar -> Yeo vs Holding
Quote from: EazyMoney on May 12, 2017, 08:33:37 AM
Treloar -> Yeo vs Holding
I feel like that trade doesn't make sense as a sideways option. You're going from someone who's proven but out of form, to someone who's unproven but in good form. Sure at some point you have to make a call based on current form, and Yeo is looking appealing as a fwd option, but as a sideways trade for Treloar I think not, even if you plan to shift him fwd later. If you trade treloar, you go to a proven, in form gun.
If it's Yeo vs hold, I say hold.
Who to start?
Barrett v Fisher v Parsons?
(Can't loophole) :(
Quote from: EazyMoney on May 12, 2017, 08:33:37 AM
Treloar -> Yeo vs Holding
If you believe in the Yeo (i.e. top 6 - 8 fwd) then this is the week to get him. Such a low BE. For a lot of teams I have seen a pretty good bye round too. DPP will help over the other bye rounds.
I will hold Treloar as I can get Yeo by trading Otten (who will probably lose money this week) and Houston who is out the next 2 weeks minimum.
Parker v Dusty M8
Quote from: Maca24 on May 11, 2017, 10:45:23 PM
Heath Shaw vs Zac Williams
Reckon I'd still go Shaw here, back in his years of premium scoring.
Quote from: EazyMoney on May 12, 2017, 08:33:37 AM
Treloar -> Yeo vs Holding
I'd hold this week.
Quote from: _wato on May 12, 2017, 12:07:22 PM
Parker v Dusty M8
Dusty for mine, Parker's only cracked one ton for the year so far.
Quote from: _wato on May 12, 2017, 12:07:22 PM
Parker v Dusty M8
Dusty has shown he can score well enough to be a top 10 mid if he gets on a roll. Pahhhhka has shown, well, nothing. Just can't see him turning it around any time soon. Dusty for me.
Quote from: GoLions on May 12, 2017, 12:30:43 PM
Quote from: _wato on May 12, 2017, 12:07:22 PM
Parker v Dusty M8
Dusty has shown he can score well enough to be a top 10 mid if he gets on a roll. Pahhhhka has shown, well, nothing. Just can't see him turning it around any time soon. Dusty for me.
+1
Beams>Yeo or hold?
Will get to avoid a donut PLUS Yeo is looking like a top 6 FWD.
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 12, 2017, 12:40:30 PM
Beams>Yeo or hold?
Will get to avoid a donut PLUS Yeo is looking like a top 6 FWD.
Who else do you have out that would cause you to cop a donut? Beams should be back next week from what I've heard, so if you have already held him one week, not much point trading him now unless you don't think he can be a keeper.
Quote from: GoLions on May 12, 2017, 12:42:32 PM
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 12, 2017, 12:40:30 PM
Beams>Yeo or hold?
Will get to avoid a donut PLUS Yeo is looking like a top 6 FWD.
Who else do you have out that would cause you to cop a donut? Beams should be back next week from what I've heard, so if you have already held him one week, not much point trading him now unless you don't think he can be a keeper.
I have $12k and 20 trades before doing any this week.
You asked so here it is!
(http://i.imgur.com/o2rScGv.png)
Ah yeah, you've been hit fairly hard then haha
Look, with Treloar/Greene/Beams all out, I'd almost be tempted to cop the hit this week. Hampton to Berry or Mutimer and swing Hibberd into defence lets you cover one donut. Butler named on field for the Tigs (on their site) so he should play. Then either upgrade Otten or Houston. Hampton to Mutimer may mean you can go Houston to Heeney? Could leave you in trouble in the byes though.
Quote from: GoLions on May 12, 2017, 12:54:36 PM
Ah yeah, you've been hit fairly hard then haha
Look, with Treloar/Greene/Beams all out, I'd almost be tempted to cop the hit this week. Hampton to Berry or Mutimer and swing Hibberd into defence lets you cover one donut. Butler named on field for the Tigs (on their site) so he should play. Then either upgrade Otten or Houston. Hampton to Mutimer may mean you can go Houston to Heeney? Could leave you in trouble in the byes though.
Might go Otten>Myers via Hibb
Houston>Yeo
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 12, 2017, 01:07:02 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 12, 2017, 12:54:36 PM
Ah yeah, you've been hit fairly hard then haha
Look, with Treloar/Greene/Beams all out, I'd almost be tempted to cop the hit this week. Hampton to Berry or Mutimer and swing Hibberd into defence lets you cover one donut. Butler named on field for the Tigs (on their site) so he should play. Then either upgrade Otten or Houston. Hampton to Mutimer may mean you can go Houston to Heeney? Could leave you in trouble in the byes though.
Might go Otten>Myers via Hibb
Houston>Yeo
Ah yeah, forgot about Myers haha. That sounds good! :)
EVW or Berry as a cash cow defender this week?
Damn you McNiece >:(
Quote from: tor01doc on May 12, 2017, 02:59:59 PM
EVW or Berry as a cash cow defender this week?
Damn you McNiece >:(
Berry I reckon.
Has more scoring potential playing as a mid.
Quote from: tor01doc on May 12, 2017, 02:59:59 PM
EVW or Berry as a cash cow defender this week?
Damn you McNiece >:(
take the punt on the new Cat kid rather then paying up for these 2.
Quote from: Holz on May 12, 2017, 03:59:44 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 12, 2017, 02:59:59 PM
EVW or Berry as a cash cow defender this week?
Damn you McNiece >:(
take the punt on the new Cat kid rather then paying up for these 2.
Too risky since he hasn't even played a game yet.
Could get injured or dropped after this week.
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 12, 2017, 04:12:15 PM
Quote from: Holz on May 12, 2017, 03:59:44 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 12, 2017, 02:59:59 PM
EVW or Berry as a cash cow defender this week?
Damn you McNiece >:(
take the punt on the new Cat kid rather then paying up for these 2.
Too risky since he hasn't even played a game yet.
Could get injured or dropped after this week.
it is but he is only 102k. if it was post byes I would say picking up a 102k non playing guy might even be a good idea.
I just dont think the other guys are good options. Berry at 170k and EVW at 155k.
I would pick none.
If your team is no good might as well punt and save the 55k-70k.
Look at his highlights from last week. He actually looks like he can play.
That is a lot of saved $$.
http://bpmultihlsvod5257.ngcdn.telstra.com/vod/ingest_afl_geelong_vod/2017/05/910960/VOD_Source/2017-05-11_03-27-18-3147/output_1100kbps_406p.mp4
He debuted into Gaelic footy at 15 and won back to back finals with back to back BOG's. Tadhg Kennelly rates him very highly.
Might go Berry this week, then Myers next week and then Williamson > O'Connor in 2 weeks if he's still playing.
3 downgrade options that should net $480k
Quote from: _wato on May 12, 2017, 04:21:48 PM
Look at his highlights from last week. He actually looks like he can play.
That is a lot of saved $$.
http://bpmultihlsvod5257.ngcdn.telstra.com/vod/ingest_afl_geelong_vod/2017/05/910960/VOD_Source/2017-05-11_03-27-18-3147/output_1100kbps_406p.mp4
He debuted into Gaelic footy at 15 and won back to back finals with back to back BOG's. Tadhg Kennelly rates him very highly.
Guy is a freak athlete. He has played 4 full games and has already got a Debut in the top comp.
its a shame he wasn't from Australia and played footy since he was 5.
Quote from: Holz on May 12, 2017, 04:30:20 PM
Guy is a freak athlete. He has played 4 full games and has already got a Debut in the top comp.
its a shame he wasn't from Australia and played footy since he was 5.
His tackling technique is great. And of course, as with most Gaelic players, they know how to kick the footy.
R12 bye rookies could be my saviours through the byes.
Hampton to Parsons/Fisher or Myers early??
Am bringing Adams back to defence and have Laird, Shaw, Otten, Marchbank, Newman, Williamson and Stewart (McGrath in midfield bench) so no room for any other defenders currently, the Inn is full there!
Want to generate some cash for another upgrade next week. Currently 20 trades and $150k to spend.
Adams vs Hanners
Docherty vs Roberton
Docherty Safer choice. Main worry is can roberton continue his awesome form but only in less than 3 percent of sides and a little bit cheaper
Quote from: bkp130 on May 12, 2017, 08:34:29 PM
Docherty vs Roberton
Docherty Safer choice. Main worry is can roberton continue his awesome form but only in less than 3 percent of sides and a little bit cheaper
Doc says Doc
Quote from: tor01doc on May 08, 2017, 08:57:37 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on May 08, 2017, 08:38:40 PM
Yeo vs Ebert vs JPK vs Kelly vs Dusty, got 541k in the bank
Ebert bad bye
JPK high BE
Dusty gone cold
Kelly not top top shelf
Guess that leaves one
dusty is cold which is why you need to get him. will turn it around and is bargain price. round 12 by is icing on the cake.
Mutimer's 53 vs. Parsons
Quote from: SilverLion on May 13, 2017, 11:01:55 AM
Mutimer's 53 vs. Parsons
I'd probably take the chance on Parsons, but much of a muchness really
Need a forward , money and bye not an issue.
Already have Greene Dahl and TJ Lynch with Nank in ruck.
Who should i get?
Quote from: bkp130 on May 12, 2017, 08:34:29 PM
Docherty vs Roberton
Docherty Safer choice. Main worry is can roberton continue his awesome form but only in less than 3 percent of sides and a little bit cheaper
Doc is the safer choice and extremely consistent but jeez Roberton is on fire. Both have same bye. As long as Carlisle and Brown are playing his scoring will remain strong.
Rance v Lloyd.
Rance gone 97+ last 2 years, good bye for me, can go 150+ and hasn't gone big yet this year. Can also throw in some 50-70's, and become a negative POD. BE of 78, assuming an ave of 90-95 for the year, would ave 95 odd from here in. $471k.
Lloyd's first year of premium scores, even when starting slow in games just racks them up to get to 90-100. DPP is a bonus, but needs a lot of ball to score well. BE 80, round 11 bye isn't great but can be managed. Ceiling seems limited, but improving young player. $488k.
Quote from: Blairholt on May 13, 2017, 11:59:03 AM
Need a forward , money and bye not an issue.
Already have Greene Dahl and TJ Lynch with Nank in ruck.
Who should i get?
Buddy or Heeney for value, Macrae rd 12 to complete.
Take Fisher or run with Myers?
Quote from: colmullet on May 13, 2017, 05:10:12 PM
Take Fisher or run with Myers?
I'll let ya know in 20 mins :P
Would take 60+ for sure though if he gets that
Quote from: GoLions on May 13, 2017, 05:13:06 PM
Quote from: colmullet on May 13, 2017, 05:10:12 PM
Take Fisher or run with Myers?
I'll let ya know in 20 mins :P
Would take 60+ for sure though if he gets that
Haha gotta make the decision before the Giants Magpies match
Couple out of the Brisbane/Hawks game
Take Berrys 71 over Otten - This is probably a definite.
Take Barretts 59 over SPP or Myers This one is a difficult call.
For next week if Rocky is flowered....
Oliver vs Cripps. :-\
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 14, 2017, 01:19:22 AM
For next week if Rocky is flowered....
Oliver vs Cripps. :-\
Cripps. Should finish the season strong.
Josh Kelly v Jelwood v Priddis
Quote from: plumdog millionaire on May 14, 2017, 11:03:35 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 14, 2017, 01:19:22 AM
For next week if Rocky is flowered....
Oliver vs Cripps. :-\
Cripps. Should finish the season strong.
Josh Kelly v Jelwood v Priddis
Selwood easy mate.
Docherty vs. Dangerfield vs. Oliver vs. Literally any other defender or mid.
Need help with this week's prem, was originally thinking this would be the week to get Danger, but looking at his breakevn (around 110?), he should still be roughly the same price next week. Docherty is becoming harder and harder to resist so he was my second pick, given his incredibly consistency, but due to this think his price won't change too much and can wait until after his bye. The third is Oliver who has also shown amazing consistency this year, and will likely continue to go up in price and is thus very tempting. Neale and Sloane should both come down at some point and would not be suitable to bring in this close to the byes.
Thoughts?
Quote from: SilverLion on May 15, 2017, 11:29:32 AM
Docherty vs. Dangerfield vs. Oliver vs. Literally any other defender or mid.
Need help with this week's prem, was originally thinking this would be the week to get Danger, but looking at his breakevn (around 110?), he should still be roughly the same price next week. Docherty is becoming harder and harder to resist so he was my second pick, given his incredibly consistency, but due to this think his price won't change too much and can wait until after his bye. The third is Oliver who has also shown amazing consistency this year, and will likely continue to go up in price and is thus very tempting. Neale and Sloane should both come down at some point and would not be suitable to bring in this close to the byes.
Thoughts?
Docherty, no bigger must have.
Rance v Z.Jones v Johannisen ?
rance vs hibberd?
Great value fallen Prems worth considering:-
JPK, Pendlebury, Dangerwood, Fyfe, Treloar, Goldy
All great options unfortunately started all of them so not options for me. :'( :'(
Even if they do have great 2nd halves of the season, all my competitors get them cheap.
treloar is now dusty and goldy turned into Stef over a month ago after I rage traded his donut (late out).
so dusty>selwood>priddis>zerrett for mids, bont if I win tattslotto ::)
Can joey hit the scoreboard in the second half or do I go Jones>LLoyd>Shaw>Hibberd and find the cash for Docherty. for me trade ups will be based on what I can afford. missed Witts, pruess, butler, WHE, so 300K short of what I need to upgrade.
A more patient approach and no second guessing following the byes.
Brought in Ryder last week as I believe he has bottomed out and will average 95+ and possibly 100+ can carry him this week and will provide depth over the byes.
Give me a chop out fellas.- Advance thank you's
Heeney+ Parker Vs Steele+ JPK
I like Heeney over Steele, but JPK over Parker. Fell just short of Heeney and JPK.
Quote from: frenzy on May 16, 2017, 08:02:40 PM
Give me a chop out fellas.- Advance thank you's
Heeney+ Parker Vs Steele+ JPK
I like Heeney over Steele, but JPK over Parker. Fell just short of Heeney and JPK.
How much cash overall? I don't like Steele as a trade-in, but was a good starting pick. And not a big fan of the Parker pick either. Can you go Heeney and Dusty?
Quote from: GoLions on May 16, 2017, 08:04:45 PM
Quote from: frenzy on May 16, 2017, 08:02:40 PM
Give me a chop out fellas.- Advance thank you's
Heeney+ Parker Vs Steele+ JPK
I like Heeney over Steele, but JPK over Parker. Fell just short of Heeney and JPK.
How much cash overall? I don't like Steele as a trade-in, but was a good starting pick. And not a big fan of the Parker pick either. Can you go Heeney and Dusty?
Yeah I started with Steele and have been reasonably happy with him but am worried about how he will run out the year.
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on May 16, 2017, 09:30:11 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 16, 2017, 08:04:45 PM
Quote from: frenzy on May 16, 2017, 08:02:40 PM
Give me a chop out fellas.- Advance thank you's
Heeney+ Parker Vs Steele+ JPK
I like Heeney over Steele, but JPK over Parker. Fell just short of Heeney and JPK.
How much cash overall? I don't like Steele as a trade-in, but was a good starting pick. And not a big fan of the Parker pick either. Can you go Heeney and Dusty?
Yeah I started with Steele and have been reasonably happy with him but am worried about how he will run out the year.
If anything Steele will make a great F6/F7 or M9. 8)
I am keeping him on his good scoring and DPP.
At worst he will be handy as forward and mid cover come finals. ;)
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 16, 2017, 09:34:27 PM
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on May 16, 2017, 09:30:11 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 16, 2017, 08:04:45 PM
Quote from: frenzy on May 16, 2017, 08:02:40 PM
Give me a chop out fellas.- Advance thank you's
Heeney+ Parker Vs Steele+ JPK
I like Heeney over Steele, but JPK over Parker. Fell just short of Heeney and JPK.
How much cash overall? I don't like Steele as a trade-in, but was a good starting pick. And not a big fan of the Parker pick either. Can you go Heeney and Dusty?
Yeah I started with Steele and have been reasonably happy with him but am worried about how he will run out the year.
If anything Steele will make a great F6/F7 or M9. 8)
I am keeping him on his good scoring and DPP.
At worst he will be handy as forward and mid cover come finals. ;)
Given his starting price he's a good pick and someone who can sit on the bench.
Quote from: Bully on May 16, 2017, 10:12:58 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 16, 2017, 09:34:27 PM
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on May 16, 2017, 09:30:11 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 16, 2017, 08:04:45 PM
Quote from: frenzy on May 16, 2017, 08:02:40 PM
Give me a chop out fellas.- Advance thank you's
Heeney+ Parker Vs Steele+ JPK
I like Heeney over Steele, but JPK over Parker. Fell just short of Heeney and JPK.
How much cash overall? I don't like Steele as a trade-in, but was a good starting pick. And not a big fan of the Parker pick either. Can you go Heeney and Dusty?
Yeah I started with Steele and have been reasonably happy with him but am worried about how he will run out the year.
If anything Steele will make a great F6/F7 or M9. 8)
I am keeping him on his good scoring and DPP.
At worst he will be handy as forward and mid cover come finals. ;)
Given his starting price he's a good pick and someone who can sit on the bench.
Yep thats the plan mate.
I reckon Burton from the Hawks is the other one that would be good for this purpose at D7.
He could also cover F7 for you due to his forward/back DPP if you trade in a non playing Forward/Back rookie at F8 to move him back and forth with such as Ubergang from Freo. 8)
Dusty Vs Jelwood?
Quote from: quinny88 on May 17, 2017, 12:21:44 AM
Dusty Vs Jelwood?
Jelwood just. Taking a look at Josh Kelly with Conigs out.
Quote from: quinny88 on May 17, 2017, 12:21:44 AM
Dusty Vs Jelwood?
I'd prefer Jelwood but BE of 150, will be cheaper next week
speaking of cheap, Dangerfield has done -$156K and ave.114, :o if you didn't have him, this would be the week to get him.
SPP - Dusty/Zorko
or
Swallow - Oliver/Selwood
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 17, 2017, 03:32:33 PM
SPP - Dusty/Zorko
or
Swallow - Oliver/Selwood
Swallow to Jelwood I reckon. Safer pick than Oliver/Zorko for sure, probably safer than Dusty, and I think SPP is a safer option to keep in the team...
Rance D4 v JJK F5
Picking one purely for bye help
Quote from: mzunguman on May 17, 2017, 04:26:59 PM
Rance D4 v JJK F5
Picking one purely for bye help
JJK for mine
Quote from: GCSkiwi on May 17, 2017, 03:48:57 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 17, 2017, 03:32:33 PM
SPP - Dusty/Zorko
or
Swallow - Oliver/Selwood
Swallow to Jelwood I reckon. Safer pick than Oliver/Zorko for sure, probably safer than Dusty, and I think SPP is a safer option to keep in the team...
Safer pick? :o
Oliver is averaging 114, has only had 1 score under 100 and scored 142 last week.
Think he is safer than Selwood atm....
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 17, 2017, 05:00:59 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on May 17, 2017, 03:48:57 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 17, 2017, 03:32:33 PM
SPP - Dusty/Zorko
or
Swallow - Oliver/Selwood
Swallow to Jelwood I reckon. Safer pick than Oliver/Zorko for sure, probably safer than Dusty, and I think SPP is a safer option to keep in the team...
Safer pick? :o
Oliver is averaging 114, has only had 1 score under 100 and scored 142 last week.
Think he is safer than Selwood atm....
I would think Oilver was the safest pick at the moment, but i have a sneaky feeling Zorko might step up with Rockliff out.
Is it to late to go with Oliver? is he a top 8/9 mid for the remainder of the season, that is the question.
Selwood is a champion and his run over the next 3 weeks ( all at Skilled stadium under lights ) is something i think has to be considered.
Has a huge B/E though :-\
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 17, 2017, 05:35:30 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 17, 2017, 05:00:59 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on May 17, 2017, 03:48:57 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 17, 2017, 03:32:33 PM
SPP - Dusty/Zorko
or
Swallow - Oliver/Selwood
Swallow to Jelwood I reckon. Safer pick than Oliver/Zorko for sure, probably safer than Dusty, and I think SPP is a safer option to keep in the team...
Safer pick? :o
Oliver is averaging 114, has only had 1 score under 100 and scored 142 last week.
Think he is safer than Selwood atm....
I would think Oilver was the safest pick at the moment, but i have a sneaky feeling Zorko might step up with Rockliff out.
Is it to late to go with Oliver? is he a top 8/9 mid for the remainder of the season, that is the question.
Selwood is a champion and his run over the next 3 weeks ( all at Skilled stadium under lights ) is something i think has to be considered.
Has a huge B/E though :-\
Jelwood is just as likely to take that BE at Skilled as an insult and have a fair crack at it. I too would love him this week but the BE does hurt. Guess the question I'm asking of myself is "Am I happy paying $548k for him?"
Normally you would take Selwood over Oliver. However there is nothing in Oliver's performances to indicate this is not his normal state of affairs. Same as Bont last year (Oliver if anything is even more consistent). Do you think he wont perform like this next year.
OTH Selwood known for strong back to season, proven long term performer. For me it is down to byes and price at time of trade.
Quote from: crowls on May 17, 2017, 05:53:53 PM
Normally you would take Selwood over Oliver. However there is nothing in Oliver's performances to indicate this is not his normal state of affairs. Same as Bont last year (Oliver if anything is even more consistent). Do you think he wont perform like this next year.
OTH Selwood known for strong back to season, proven long term performer. For me it is down to byes and price at time of trade.
Which means? Selwood? 8)
Donut
v
Durdin
v
Non Bubble fwd rookie
v
Risky fwd pick <427k Pedo/Petracca/Burton/Hawkins
Quote from: Gigantor on May 18, 2017, 08:48:44 PM
Donut
v
Durdin
v
Non Bubble fwd rookie
v
Risky fwd pick <427k Pedo/Petracca/Burton/Hawkins
That's a real pickle. I'm going to suggest donut because the others aren't as good long term :-\
Balic > Stewart and Otten > Hibberd and no donut in FWD's or
SPP > Myers and Hampton > JJ or Howe or Rance with a donut in the FWD's ?
Bolton vs Greenwood
Risky business
Hurley V Williams V Rance (Good bye)
Quote from: PICCOLLO on May 18, 2017, 09:55:25 PM
Bolton vs Greenwood
Risky business
Greenwood if you need one of these fellas. DPP, mature and cheap so ticks all the boxes (good luck!).
Quote from: mzunguman on May 18, 2017, 10:13:49 PM
Hurley V Williams V Rance (Good bye)
I really like Hurley, but go Rance if it suits your byes better.
Butler & Swallow - Stefan Martin (Via Nankervis) & Bolton or Greenwood? :-\
Or
Butler & Swallow - Dusty & Bolton or Greenwood?
:'(
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 18, 2017, 11:25:04 PM
Butler & Swallow - Stefan Martin (Via Nankervis) & Bolton or Greenwood? :-\
Or
Butler & Swallow - Dusty & Bolton or Greenwood?
:'(
First one and Greenwood.
Assuming Swallow is M8 and Butler F6 then:
-SMartin allows you to move your F5 to F6 but you're left with a weaker M9, which you can always loophole.
-DMartin allows M7 to M8 but F7 to F6. You'll probably have weak FWD coverage with Eddy (If you have him) and Greenwood/Bolton + can't swing Nank as he's already in FWD's.
Cripps v Zerret?
Cripps $543k with BE of 62. 3 tonnes in a row including the biggy v Saints. I think he's hitting his straps.
Zerret $560k with BE of 60. Proven ball winner
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 19, 2017, 07:13:30 AM
Cripps v Zerret?
Cripps $543k with BE of 62. 3 tonnes in a row including the biggy v Saints. I think he's hitting his straps.
Zerret $560k with BE of 60. Proven ball winner
Cripps
Quote from: tkringle on May 19, 2017, 08:47:37 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 19, 2017, 07:13:30 AM
Cripps v Zerret?
Cripps $543k with BE of 62. 3 tonnes in a row including the biggy v Saints. I think he's hitting his straps.
Zerret $560k with BE of 60. Proven ball winner
Cripps
Zerrett :P
Quote from: Huttabito on May 17, 2017, 05:46:25 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 17, 2017, 05:35:30 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 17, 2017, 05:00:59 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on May 17, 2017, 03:48:57 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 17, 2017, 03:32:33 PM
SPP - Dusty/Zorko
or
Swallow - Oliver/Selwood
Swallow to Jelwood I reckon. Safer pick than Oliver/Zorko for sure, probably safer than Dusty, and I think SPP is a safer option to keep in the team...
Safer pick? :o
Oliver is averaging 114, has only had 1 score under 100 and scored 142 last week.
Think he is safer than Selwood atm....
I would think Oilver was the safest pick at the moment, but i have a sneaky feeling Zorko might step up with Rockliff out.
Is it to late to go with Oliver? is he a top 8/9 mid for the remainder of the season, that is the question.
Selwood is a champion and his run over the next 3 weeks ( all at Skilled stadium under lights ) is something i think has to be considered.
Has a huge B/E though :-\
Jelwood is just as likely to take that BE at Skilled as an insult and have a fair crack at it. I too would love him this week but the BE does hurt. Guess the question I'm asking of myself is "Am I happy paying $548k for him?"
I paid $612 3 weeks back. Not happy :D.
Heeney v Koby Stevens
How many second year players have managed a 114 average for the year? Oliver hast started well and is emulating the feats of Cripps, I'd bet he finishes with an average of 100-105.
Greenwood v McInnes v Stewart for FWD rookie Option?
Greenwood , Stewart, McInnes in that order
Dusty vs Oliver
Stewart vs Lloyd? Both playing 2nd game
Quote from: GoLions on May 19, 2017, 12:19:33 PM
Quote from: tkringle on May 19, 2017, 08:47:37 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 19, 2017, 07:13:30 AM
Cripps v Zerret?
Cripps $543k with BE of 62. 3 tonnes in a row including the biggy v Saints. I think he's hitting his straps.
Zerret $560k with BE of 60. Proven ball winner
Cripps
Zerrett :P
x2 ;)
Quote from: tommy10 on May 20, 2017, 01:26:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 19, 2017, 12:19:33 PM
Quote from: tkringle on May 19, 2017, 08:47:37 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 19, 2017, 07:13:30 AM
Cripps v Zerret?
Cripps $543k with BE of 62. 3 tonnes in a row including the biggy v Saints. I think he's hitting his straps.
Zerret $560k with BE of 60. Proven ball winner
Cripps
Zerrett :P
x2 ;)
Or do I wait until next week and grab Dusty?
May have been asked before
Cameron vs Greene
Im leaning towards Cameron, but i already have 3 tall players who can be inconsistent (Lynch, Rough,Nank)
Lloyd (GWS) v Perryman v Myers.
Tough to habe job security at GWS but who would we go for the next 5 weeks...money makers?
Quote from: Hawka on May 21, 2017, 10:23:35 PM
May have been asked before
Cameron vs Greene
Im leaning towards Cameron, but i already have 3 tall players who can be inconsistent (Lynch, Rough,Nank)
Probably Greene.
Similar question. Greene v Cameron v Buddy v Ryder v Kennedy (WC) v Wingard. PA and GC players have bonus of having had their bye. To finish my forward line.
Yeo, Dahl, Macrae, Lynch, Heeney, ???
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 21, 2017, 01:31:30 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on May 20, 2017, 01:26:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on May 19, 2017, 12:19:33 PM
Quote from: tkringle on May 19, 2017, 08:47:37 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 19, 2017, 07:13:30 AM
Cripps v Zerret?
Cripps $543k with BE of 62. 3 tonnes in a row including the biggy v Saints. I think he's hitting his straps.
Zerret $560k with BE of 60. Proven ball winner
Cripps
Zerrett :P
x2 ;)
Or do I wait until next week and grab Dusty?
Grab him this week.
Perryman vs McInnes
Quote from: tommy10 on May 22, 2017, 10:24:37 PM
Perryman vs McInnes
Perryman probably slightly better JS but not confident either will be around long
selwood vs sloane
Quote from: sammy123 on May 22, 2017, 11:21:45 PM
selwood vs sloane
Selwood, will come home strong I think. Very pleased he had his annual form slump, I will be picking him up myself.
Quote from: Bully on May 22, 2017, 11:30:36 PM
Quote from: sammy123 on May 22, 2017, 11:21:45 PM
selwood vs sloane
Selwood, will come home strong I think. Very pleased he had his annual form slump, I will be picking him up myself.
traded him for the moment pending teams. he just love playing at skilled
Quote from: sammy123 on May 22, 2017, 11:32:14 PM
Quote from: Bully on May 22, 2017, 11:30:36 PM
Quote from: sammy123 on May 22, 2017, 11:21:45 PM
selwood vs sloane
Selwood, will come home strong I think. Very pleased he had his annual form slump, I will be picking him up myself.
traded him for the moment pending teams. he just love playing at skilled
Year in, year out he has his 3 down games then bounces back.
I picked him up last week despite having a BE of 150, happy with what I paid for his 124 points and expect him to be good the rest of the season now.
Hibberd (437K) vs Howe (453K)
Quote from: tkringle on May 24, 2017, 12:12:01 PM
Hibberd (437K) vs Howe (453K)
6 of 1. Go with whoever suits your bye structure best, or if no issue is pick Hibberd as he's cheaper
Hibberd vs Harbrow
Quote from: mac1 on May 24, 2017, 07:45:14 PM
Hibberd vs Harbrow
i have looked hard at the def upgrade options. Hibberd is playing well and capable of sustaining 90-95+. Harbrow has jumped to a new level and question is can he sustain it. Is it a new role that has brought the score increase, will the situation remain the same going forward? I am not confident any of the returnees will have a consistent scoring season. Hoping Harbrow role doesnt change. Also Harbrow provides cover for all bye rounds which is worth 3-5pts as well. For me it is Harbrow. If $ short Hibberd is a decent choice. Do it this week though as he is slated to go up 30k this weekend.
Quote from: Huttabito on May 24, 2017, 10:38:30 AM
Quote from: sammy123 on May 22, 2017, 11:32:14 PM
Quote from: Bully on May 22, 2017, 11:30:36 PM
Quote from: sammy123 on May 22, 2017, 11:21:45 PM
selwood vs sloane
Selwood, will come home strong I think. Very pleased he had his annual form slump, I will be picking him up myself.
traded him for the moment pending teams. he just love playing at skilled
Year in, year out he has his 3 down games then bounces back.
I picked him up last week despite having a BE of 150, happy with what I paid for his 124 points and expect him to be good the rest of the season now.
Did the same mate. ;D
Ryder v Goldy
Quote from: mzunguman on May 25, 2017, 12:33:20 AM
Ryder v Goldy
I'd back Goldy to go at 5ppg higher from here. Depends on your bye structure and need for DPP though.
Hibberd vs. Pittard?
Quote from: BomberSam on May 25, 2017, 12:48:00 AM
Hibberd vs. Pittard?
Hibberd for me unless you need bye cover then take pittard.
Should I trade out Wingard or Sandilands
Wingard is expected out 2 weeks
Sandilands out this week + bye round 13
The first bye looks like I'm going to struggle pretty big for numbers.
Quote from: miamis_finest on May 25, 2017, 12:45:49 PM
Should I trade out Wingard or Sandilands
Wingard is expected out 2 weeks
Sandilands out this week + bye round 13
The first bye looks like I'm going to struggle pretty big for numbers.
If you're planning on trading sandi anyway I'd trade him, high possibility he will miss more than 1 imo
Who to play on field:
Otten or Berry?
SPP, Barrett or Myers?
Quote from: BomberSam on May 25, 2017, 01:02:33 PM
Who to play on field:
Otten or Berry?
SPP, Barrett or Myers?
Otten
SPP or loophole any two if able.
Ryder v Nank? Torn, both provide ruck cover, Ryder handy for byes.
Quote from: dmac07 on May 25, 2017, 02:39:40 PM
Ryder v Nank? Torn, both provide ruck cover, Ryder handy for byes.
I am rapt with my Nank selection. Averaging 103, he's been awesome so far. From here on I see him averaging around 95.
Ryder is 20k more expensive and I see him averaging the same. He'll be more of a POD and he certainly helps with bye coverage. Let your decision depend upon your teams situation.
Who to trade: Stewart vs Williamson?
Both pretty much maxed out and need to get rid of one of them this week.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on May 25, 2017, 05:43:52 PM
Who to trade: Stewart vs Williamson?
Both pretty much maxed out and need to get rid of one of them this week.
Williamson has the bye next week so probably him
WHE - Pendlebury
or
Marchbank - Roberton
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 26, 2017, 11:19:31 AM
WHE - Pendlebury
or
Marchbank - Roberton
Depends on the structure of your team but probably WHE to pendlebury
Harbrow vs Hibberd
Which 2 do I put on the park
Berry, Marchbank or mcgrath
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on May 26, 2017, 12:13:32 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 26, 2017, 11:19:31 AM
WHE - Pendlebury
or
Marchbank - Roberton
Depends on the structure of your team but probably WHE to pendlebury
My midfield at the moment is a 5 premo - 3 rookie structure and its in dire need of upgrading.
Forward line has WHE on the bench but cause there is no Sandi this week he is playing.
If i trade WHE ill have to move Greenwood to F6
Quote from: jrmoo on May 26, 2017, 01:06:20 PM
Which 2 do I put on the park
Berry, Marchbank or mcgrath
Berry & Mcgrath
Start Myers or Berry?
I would start Berry - Been named on the ball again - Only concern though would be where Beastmode plays when he is in.
Quote from: Ringo on May 26, 2017, 02:37:15 PM
I would start Berry - Been named on the ball again - Only concern though would be where Beastmode plays when he is in.
Matho is a contested beast though, he'll feed the ball out to Berry ;)
Sandi to:
Yeo Via DPP with nank in rucks
or to goldy?
My issue with Goldy is potential of preuss playing later in year or soon
Hibberd + $155k vs Docherty
Docherty is a machine, but Hibberd seems like a bargain.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 26, 2017, 06:17:17 PM
Hibberd + $155k vs Docherty
Docherty is a machine, but Hibberd seems like a bargain.
If you still have room for Doc later I'd grab Hibberd, otherwise Doc now
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 26, 2017, 06:17:17 PM
Hibberd + $155k vs Docherty
Docherty is a machine, but Hibberd seems like a bargain.
How many slots left?
If 2 then grab Hibberd now as his BE is so low and bye no issue
Sandi to Goldy, Myers on field
Or Ablett to Titch, Greenwood on field
A bit worried about the Preuss potential down the line. Means I'll probably keep SandiWitts for a fair while still though. Ablett should be back next week, but with the shoulder issues do I cut my losses?
Quote from: benny_fraz on May 26, 2017, 04:15:17 PM
Sandi to:
Yeo Via DPP with nank in rucks
or to goldy?
My issue with Goldy is potential of preuss playing later in year or soon
BE 142 vs 63
Quote from: tor01doc on May 26, 2017, 06:25:01 PM
Quote from: benny_fraz on May 26, 2017, 04:15:17 PM
Sandi to:
Yeo Via DPP with nank in rucks
or to goldy?
My issue with Goldy is potential of preuss playing later in year or soon
BE 142 vs 63
It's not all about the money unfortunately. When North can't make final in r20 or whatever, surely they send Goldy in to clean out his ankle and give Preuss games. Preuss will have to play at some stage bar injury and for that reason Goldy is a nope from me this season I think
I get that but Yeo is not a must this week
Quote from: tor01doc on May 26, 2017, 06:23:22 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 26, 2017, 06:17:17 PM
Hibberd + $155k vs Docherty
Docherty is a machine, but Hibberd seems like a bargain.
How many slots left?
If 2 then grab Hibberd now as his BE is so low and bye no issue
Still 3 slots.
Currently Adams, Laird, Shaw with Marchbank, Otten and Newman. Thinking Docherty will take 1 spot, which leaves 2. Maybe Roberton, Zac Lloyd or Hibberd for others.
Doch BE of 115. Hibberd BE of 34.
Think I've talked myself into it.
Have to play 2 out of Fisher, Myers, Llyod (GWS) and Barrett.... Can't loophole either :-\
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 27, 2017, 12:34:15 AM
Have to play 2 out of Fisher, Myers, Llyod (GWS) and Barrett.... Can't loophole either :-\
Barrett and Myers
GWS Lloyd vs GWS Perryman?
Doing my head in this one ::)
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 27, 2017, 07:23:44 AM
GWS Lloyd vs GWS Perryman?
Doing my head in this one ::)
Perryman is a DPP, that could be very handy.
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 27, 2017, 12:34:15 AM
Have to play 2 out of Fisher, Myers, Llyod (GWS) and Barrett.... Can't loophole either :-\
Maybe Barrett and Fisher? Difficult
I'm trying to split Fisher and Myers - any suggestions?
Quote from: dylanclements on May 27, 2017, 11:49:50 AM
Quote from: Hazza09 on May 27, 2017, 12:34:15 AM
Have to play 2 out of Fisher, Myers, Llyod (GWS) and Barrett.... Can't loophole either :-\
Maybe Barrett and Fisher? Difficult
I'm trying to split Fisher and Myers - any suggestions?
Same dilemma, currently have Myers on the field. 83 DT at 70% the last week, with a bit fairer scoring and more TOG he could score really well.
Goldy or Jacobs?
Quote from: Bully on May 27, 2017, 10:54:40 AM
Quote from: HoleMeal on May 27, 2017, 07:23:44 AM
GWS Lloyd vs GWS Perryman?
Doing my head in this one ::)
Perryman is a DPP, that could be very handy.
I have Adams, Berry and Hibberd so not too concerned with DPP.
Quote from: Vinny on May 27, 2017, 12:11:55 PM
Goldy or Jacobs?
Goldstein. Higher ceiling for scoring.
Any reason why no one is going with Mumford? Second ranked ruck for the season so far?
Therefore, my question is this: Mumford vs. Goldstein? As a North fan, I'm wary of Goldy getting rested late in the season with niggles as it gives us a reason to play Preuss who has been excellent in limited time this season. Trading out Sandilands for one of these two.
Last year was the first time mummy played close to a full season only missing the one game. Prior to that missed a lot of games through injury and suspension so coaches a little wary on that score. (Missed a total of 25 games in the previous 4 seasons)
Quote from: Ringo on May 27, 2017, 02:16:34 PM
Last year was the first time mummy played close to a full season only missing the one game. Prior to that missed a lot of games through injury and suspension so coaches a little wary on that score. (Missed a total of 25 games in the previous 4 seasons)
Yep, still feeling burned from when I picked him up round 3 after 3 massive scores, only for him to miss the next few weeks with injury. The worst part of it was GWS kept saying he was only a week away so I kept holding him
Yeah im looking at either Mummy or Goldy as my Sandilands replacement.
- Mumford doesn't have a lot of ruck competition but has been known to miss games
- Goldstein scoring well but you would have to think he would be rested later in the year if he has niggles and to get games into Pruess..
Not sure which way to go?
Would never pick Mumford.
Just always seems a week away from injury and heartache. :'(
I have gone Goldy and hoping to have a trade up my sleeve to sideways him when rested. At the moment hoping to have 4/5 trades for injury/resting upgrades.
Quote from: tkringle on May 27, 2017, 02:21:35 PM
Yeah im looking at either Mummy or Goldy as my Sandilands replacement.
- Mumford doesn't have a lot of ruck competition but has been known to miss games
- Goldstein scoring well but you would have to think he would be rested later in the year if he has niggles and to get games into Pruess..
Not sure which way to go?
What is the motivation to trade Sandi. Ok he his out this week. Do you expect RL to rest him on a few interstate games. From a SC scoring perspective little reason to trade Sandi. For me I might do it just because I have ruck coverage already and can use his cash to upgrade to a superprem in mids.
Quote from: crowls on May 27, 2017, 02:40:42 PM
Quote from: tkringle on May 27, 2017, 02:21:35 PM
Yeah im looking at either Mummy or Goldy as my Sandilands replacement.
- Mumford doesn't have a lot of ruck competition but has been known to miss games
- Goldstein scoring well but you would have to think he would be rested later in the year if he has niggles and to get games into Pruess..
Not sure which way to go?
What is the motivation to trade Sandi. Ok he his out this week. Do you expect RL to rest him on a few interstate games. From a SC scoring perspective little reason to trade Sandi. For me I might do it just because I have ruck coverage already and can use his cash to upgrade to a superprem in mids.
I traded Sandi out to Ryder this week due to being round 13 bye heavy and plus I am going for overall.
I have Witts as my other ruck and Nank in the forwards who can be swung to the ruck so all good there
I think rucks are over rated this year, would rather just concentrate on getting myself an F6, M8 and D6 instead. ;)
In my cash league game I'm currently 125 behind and the only player we have common remaining is Barrett. I have Pendlebury, Adams, Martin, Greene & Shaw and opponent has Murphy, Treloar, Yeo and Zac Williams.
Do I keep Barrett to match him or do I go with Fisher or D Llyod from GWS?
Bont vs JPK ROS?
Cheers peeps.
who do i target as my last mid upgrade? Pendles, Dusty, Titch, or Sloane? ATM have Danger, Bont, JPK, Treloar, Fyfe, Beams, Rocky
Quote from: colmullet on May 29, 2017, 03:57:20 PM
who do i target as my last mid upgrade? Pendles, Dusty, Titch, or Sloane? ATM have Danger, Bont, JPK, Treloar, Fyfe, Beams, Rocky
Sloane and THIS week
Low BE
Bolton or Cousins a week early? Think I can only squeeze one in. Byes don't matter. Will Bolton keep his spot? Cousins apparently has ok JS. Hawks or Tigers supporters want to way in?
Quote from: no eye deer on May 29, 2017, 05:37:20 PM
Bolton or Cousins a week early? Think I can only squeeze one in. Byes don't matter. Will Bolton keep his spot? Cousins apparently has ok JS. Hawks or Tigers supporters want to way in?
Cousins looked good and Hawks have a fair few injuries. Bolton JS very shaky imo
Quote from: GoLions on May 29, 2017, 05:46:35 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 29, 2017, 05:37:20 PM
Bolton or Cousins a week early? Think I can only squeeze one in. Byes don't matter. Will Bolton keep his spot? Cousins apparently has ok JS. Hawks or Tigers supporters want to way in?
Cousins looked good and Hawks have a fair few injuries. Bolton JS very shaky imo
Cheers GL. Cheaper as well.
I didn't see Cousins but am looking at him over Bolton. Bolton is probably competing with Butler, Castagna, Lennon, Rioli, Lloyd, and to some extent even guys like Menadue. It's hard to know exactly how Dimma sees his ideal team but I think his direct competition in Rioli, Castagna, and Lloyd are a bit more advanced at this stage. Butler seemed to show enough to come back in pretty quickly, and Lennon will probably get a go soon too - rightly or wrongly I think Castagna and Bolton are the two most likely to get the chop. There'll be some shuffling among these guys all year I reckon
Quote from: no eye deer on May 29, 2017, 05:37:20 PM
Bolton or Cousins a week early? Think I can only squeeze one in. Byes don't matter. Will Bolton keep his spot? Cousins apparently has ok JS. Hawks or Tigers supporters want to way in?
Cousins JS should be solid, played great on the weekend and i really think he has talent!
Quote from: Hawka on May 30, 2017, 02:05:41 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 29, 2017, 05:37:20 PM
Bolton or Cousins a week early? Think I can only squeeze one in. Byes don't matter. Will Bolton keep his spot? Cousins apparently has ok JS. Hawks or Tigers supporters want to way in?
Cousins JS should be solid, played great on the weekend and i really think he has talent!
Cousins is a way better option than Bolton IMO.
Better JS and higher scoring potential.
Cheers for all the replies fellas. Cousins it is then.
Sloane ($586.8k and 49 BE) v Pendles ($560.1k and 57 BE) v Jelwood ($547.4k and 62 BE)
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 30, 2017, 08:18:40 PM
Sloane ($586.8k and 49 BE) v Pendles ($560.1k and 57 BE) v Jelwood ($547.4k and 62 BE)
Round 12 bye - Duckwood
Round 13 - Sloane and Pendles
Does that influence you?
I would rate them Sloane then Pendles then 'Free kick for' (check the stats before you argue)
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 30, 2017, 08:18:40 PM
Sloane ($586.8k and 49 BE) v Pendles ($560.1k and 57 BE) v Jelwood ($547.4k and 62 BE)
Impossible choice, can't go wrong with any. I'd probably go Selwood due to great bye, cheap price & heaps of home games.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 30, 2017, 08:18:40 PM
Sloane ($586.8k and 49 BE) v Pendles ($560.1k and 57 BE) v Jelwood ($547.4k and 62 BE)
Sloane, Pendles and Selwood in that order
Sloane or Dusty guys/girls ?
I like Sloane better but Dusty is playing Rd 13 when I need players..
I'm not going for overall just league overall
Quote from: Mark on May 30, 2017, 09:40:48 PM
Sloane or Dusty guys/girls ?
I like Sloane better but Dusty is playing Rd 13 when I need players..
I'm not going for overall just league overall
Sloane will net you more points in the long run, especially come the pointy/final end of the season.
Wines vs Gray
Quote from: Maca24 on May 30, 2017, 11:25:53 PM
Wines vs Gray
Wines for me, bringing him in myself. For reasoning & data, seems to have broken the 120+ ceiling this year, Port have a very nice run coming up which should give him a decent share of the midfield points, seems more durable than Gray & is currently 58k under his true value. Great player to eventually plonk at M9.
Really struggling with who to ditch for Scooter Selwood, would love a bit of help!
The 3 options I have are SPP, Jake Barrett and Zac Fisher.
SPP: Held through his bye and should serve as cover over the next 3 weeks. However has maxed out on price.
Barrett: Has been a good scorer as of late and still has some cash to make. Has the bye this week.
Fisher: Scoring potential limited, also has the bye this week. Requires 80k to move up and may still have $$ to make
Thanks!
I would go Fisher, Barrett and SPP in that order. Think Fisher will make less cash than Barrett and as you say with SPP he plays through byes. If concerned about SPP could go SPP to Cousins on the bubble in Rd 13.
Quote from: Ringo on May 31, 2017, 04:36:36 PM
I would go Fisher, Barrett and SPP in that order. Think Fisher will make less cash than Barrett and as you say with SPP he plays through byes. If concerned about SPP could go SPP to Cousins on the bubble in Rd 13.
Thanks Ringo! That was my thinking as of right now. Will just have to fork out the 80k I think
3 - 4 guys are on my radar this week.
Who to get?
I will not have any donuts at this stage (assuming no wholesale changes are made at the selection table and that I avoid a whole raft of injuries)
Greenwood - bubble boy DPP good JS by all accounts
Sharenberg - a week early as Marchbank needs to go and I need the cash now
Scooter - low BE will score well and if I end up trading him out a good cash injection
Sloane - low BE so as cheap as he will get and will complete my mids
I don't think I can afford Greenwood and Scooter and Sloane so those 3 are not an option
Decisions decisions decisions
Quote from: tor01doc on June 01, 2017, 09:58:00 AM
3 - 4 guys are on my radar this week.
Who to get?
I will not have any donuts at this stage (assuming no wholesale changes are made at the selection table and that I avoid a whole raft of injuries)
Greenwood - bubble boy DPP good JS by all accounts
Sharenberg - a week early as Marchbank needs to go and I need the cash now
Scooter - low BE will score well and if I end up trading him out a good cash injection
Sloane - low BE so as cheap as he will get and will complete my mids
I don't think I can afford Greenwood and Scooter and Sloane so those 3 are not an option
Decisions decisions decisions
Greenwood Scooter Sloane are the three I'm likely bringing in this week, for Taranto, WHE and Balic. Only move I'm not 100% on is Taranto to Scooter, but WHE/Balic to Sloane/Greenwood is done. And 90% there on Taranto to Scooter.
Seeing as you can't afford all 3, what's more important to you, cash or points? And also consider byes...
Greenwood I think is a relative lock at this point, scoring well and will make more money than Scooter. Then get Scooter if you need money, again he's scoring well (though I don't expect him to continue as he has) and will make a bit of cash. Sloane I don't think will come much cheaper than now, and it won't be until round 16ish if he does (a game or two after the 177 drops out), so if you see him as a must have mid you've gotta strongly consider getting him now I think. But he buggers up a lot of poeple's bye planning.
Quote from: GCSkiwi on June 01, 2017, 10:05:18 AM
Quote from: tor01doc on June 01, 2017, 09:58:00 AM
3 - 4 guys are on my radar this week.
Who to get?
I will not have any donuts at this stage (assuming no wholesale changes are made at the selection table and that I avoid a whole raft of injuries)
Greenwood - bubble boy DPP good JS by all accounts
Sharenberg - a week early as Marchbank needs to go and I need the cash now
Scooter - low BE will score well and if I end up trading him out a good cash injection
Sloane - low BE so as cheap as he will get and will complete my mids
I don't think I can afford Greenwood and Scooter and Sloane so those 3 are not an option
Decisions decisions decisions
Greenwood Scooter Sloane are the three I'm likely bringing in this week, for Taranto, WHE and Balic. Only move I'm not 100% on is Taranto to Scooter, but WHE/Balic to Sloane/Greenwood is done. And 90% there on Taranto to Scooter.
Seeing as you can't afford all 3, what's more important to you, cash or points? And also consider byes...
Greenwood I think is a relative lock at this point, scoring well and will make more money than Scooter. Then get Scooter if you need money, again he's scoring well (though I don't expect him to continue as he has) and will make a bit of cash. Sloane I don't think will come much cheaper than now, and it won't be until round 16ish if he does (a game or two after the 177 drops out), so if you see him as a must have mid you've gotta strongly consider getting him now I think. But he buggers up a lot of poeple's bye planning.
Cheers
I think I will get Shaz Greenwood and Sloane
Scooter is a cheap mid priced stepping stone but not essential IMO
Cousins v Bolton?
doing 2 trades this week
Ist one is Fisher - Selwood
Deciding between Hampton - Scharenburg or Balic - Bolton
Cant decide :-\
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 01, 2017, 01:38:45 PM
doing 2 trades this week
Ist one is Fisher - Selwood
Deciding between Hampton - Scharenburg or Balic - Bolton
Cant decide :-\
Hampton to Scharenberg, hampton out a long time and although scharenberg expensive very little in the way of def downgrades coming up. Bolton can be missed.
Quote from: dmac07 on June 01, 2017, 02:28:44 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 01, 2017, 01:38:45 PM
doing 2 trades this week
Ist one is Fisher - Selwood
Deciding between Hampton - Scharenburg or Balic - Bolton
Cant decide :-\
Hampton to Scharenberg, hampton out a long time and although scharenberg expensive very little in the way of def downgrades coming up. Bolton can be missed.
Agree - Bolton could lose his spot when Butler comes back.
Quote from: Ringo on June 01, 2017, 03:54:03 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on June 01, 2017, 02:28:44 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 01, 2017, 01:38:45 PM
doing 2 trades this week
Ist one is Fisher - Selwood
Deciding between Hampton - Scharenburg or Balic - Bolton
Cant decide :-\
Hampton to Scharenberg, hampton out a long time and although scharenberg expensive very little in the way of def downgrades coming up. Bolton can be missed.
Agree - Bolton could lose his spot when Butler comes back.
Also likely to be rested at some stage.
I'm stuck..
Sloane or Dusty or wait for Rocky ?
Assuming Bolton is named alongside Butler, which option:
Option A
Miller - Greenwood
Fisher - Scooter
Newman - Shaz
Option B
Miller - Greenwood
Fisher - Scooter
Berry - Bolton
Bolton will open up DPP for me which will be handy in the byes..
Quote from: tkringle on June 01, 2017, 06:59:16 PM
Assuming Bolton is named alongside Butler, which option:
Option A
Miller - Greenwood
Fisher - Scooter
Newman - Shaz
Option B
Miller - Greenwood
Fisher - Scooter
Berry - Bolton
Bolton will open up DPP for me which will be handy in the byes..
Depends on your bye situation in the next three weeks, but it's really Newman + Bolton vs Shaz + Berry plus $$? Would be leaning towards option B
Is Marchbank-Ryan worth the trade? Need to double upgrade next week
With Sandi out thinking getting Ryan too to make up 18.
Quote from: Jesty on June 04, 2017, 04:23:20 PM
With Sandi out thinking getting Ryan too to make up 18.
That's a sensible trade, I really like Ryan by the way, watched a few of his VFL performances and he looks like AFL quality.
Yeah trading out Macreadie so no great lose. lol
Quote from: Jesty on June 04, 2017, 05:19:04 PM
Yeah trading out Macreadie so no great lose. lol
So Does Marchbank-Ryan ;D
Hibberd v Roberton?
Quote from: mzunguman on June 04, 2017, 11:00:17 PM
Hibberd v Roberton?
I traded Roberton in just after he stopped being super awesome. He's still doing OK and I hope he comes back refreshed from his bye. He's actually copped a tag in a few games too so be careful of that.
Hibberd I'm still waiting for him to burn everyone :P
Rocky Vs Sloane/Pendles
Sloane not playing too much at AO after his bye and seems like teams are tagging him more?
Pendles is always reliable, I have Trelor also.
Rocky has the shoulder issue and Beams/Zorko to contend with. He's playing Rnd13 which is handy but chances are I'm screwed that round anyway so going Pendles/Sloane is probably not a big deal. Might as well tank that round...
If Sandi is out, I'll likely swing Nank into the rucks and wait for Gawn.
That poses the question: Tom Lynch vs Mitch Wallis?
Quote from: Marcon on June 06, 2017, 10:50:11 AM
If Sandi is out, I'll likely swing Nank into the rucks and wait for Gawn.
That poses the question: Tom Lynch vs Mitch Wallis?
Lynch
Docherty v Roberton + 65k v Hibberd + 120k
Fisher or Myers - Cousins?
&
Stewart or Nemwan - Docherty :-\
Quote from: _wato on June 06, 2017, 10:57:14 AM
Docherty v Roberton + 65k v Hibberd + 120k
Think you have to go Docherty there, but if you need the cash I'd go Roberton
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 06, 2017, 12:59:42 PM
Fisher or Myers - Cousins?
&
Stewart or Nemwan - Docherty :-\
Myers > Cousins
Newman > Docherty
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 06, 2017, 12:59:42 PM
Fisher or Myers - Cousins?
&
Stewart or Nemwan - Docherty :-\
Myers to Cousins - same bye
Newman to Doc - Stewart has still money to make and think Newman won't make too much more cash
Trade Otten or Marchbank to Hibberd? Thinking Otten because of round 13 bye and last upgrade on def will be Marchbank to Doc once Stewart bottoms out
Sandilands > Mitch Wallis (already have two bulldogs forwards) or Heeney/Franklin/Pederson/Ryder?
I did a tonne of research this morning looking at the Macrae/Bont/Dahl/Wallis/Libba dynamic and had an extra look at Stevens. The good news is all the Doggies have shown they can score well when playing together. The bad news is that was last year when they were #1 in team fantasy points. This season they aren't in the top 5.
With that being said, they have a relatively good run and plenty of chances to get big wins (in which we have seen them all score well). Stevens should be good, he's going to be an inside mid but there's probably an expiry on that with Armitage 2 months away.
I wouldn't be afraid of loading up on Dogs forwards. Bont I might hesitate with given there's so much competition for SC points and going 110+ generally comes with less competition on your team for points.
Macrea vs Lynch? Who to bring in for WHE.
Or Dixon/Wallis/Franklin?
Or wait next week for Yeo?
Currently: Dahl, Heeney, Steele, Nank, Higgins, WHE
Have a feeling macrea might not be worth the $.
Quote from: petefisker on June 07, 2017, 10:39:07 PM
Macrea vs Lynch? Who to bring in for WHE.
Or Dixon/Wallis/Franklin?
Or wait next week for Yeo?
Currently: Dahl, Heeney, Steele, Nank, Higgins, WHE
Have a feeling macrea might not be worth the $.
POD of your keen would be Dixon.... Franklin is old reliable.... Lynch is cheap I've got Yeo and haven't been dissapointed so far! Hope that helps at all?
Who to keep....
Berry v SPP??
Quote from: mzunguman on June 07, 2017, 10:47:18 PM
Quote from: petefisker on June 07, 2017, 10:39:07 PM
Macrea vs Lynch? Who to bring in for WHE.
Or Dixon/Wallis/Franklin?
Or wait next week for Yeo?
Currently: Dahl, Heeney, Steele, Nank, Higgins, WHE
Have a feeling macrea might not be worth the $.
POD of your keen would be Dixon.... Franklin is old reliable.... Lynch is cheap I've got Yeo and haven't been dissapointed so far! Hope that helps at all?
Who to keep....
Berry v SPP??
id keep SPP for now
Who averages more for the rest of the year?
Buddy vs Lynch (GC)
I think Buddy looks ripe to go large.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 08, 2017, 06:22:54 PM
Who averages more for the rest of the year?
Buddy vs Lynch (GC)
I think Buddy looks ripe to go large.
I'm bringing in 2 out of Buddy/Wallis/Lynch, was set on Buddy/Wallis, now have flipped to Lynch/Wallis. No idea which way to go...
May have been mentioned previously... Ryan vs. Scharenberg?
Quote from: SilverLion on June 08, 2017, 06:33:30 PM
May have been mentioned previously... Ryan vs. Scharenberg?
Scharenberg has shown he's not worth the extra $50k IMO.
Quote from: jvalles69 on June 08, 2017, 06:32:25 PM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 08, 2017, 06:22:54 PM
Who averages more for the rest of the year?
Buddy vs Lynch (GC)
I think Buddy looks ripe to go large.
I'm bringing in 2 out of Buddy/Wallis/Lynch, was set on Buddy/Wallis, now have flipped to Lynch/Wallis. No idea which way to go...
Scratch that, flipped back to Buddy/Wallis. ::)
Quote from: jvalles69 on June 08, 2017, 06:41:56 PM
Scratch that, flipped back to Buddy/Wallis. ::)
They are both shots in the dark, take whichever you like more. I thought Wallis was absolutely outstanding 3 weeks ago so I'm going with him.
Can't be bothered creating a 'Who to field' thread for this week so will ask here:
Have Pittard, Newman, Berry as D5-7, Stewart D8 with the bye. Should I make Newman emg tonight and loophole him if he goes well, or field him straight up, and loophole Berry on Saturday and take off Pittard if Berry goes well?
Hmm might have to go early on one of these new forward rookies...
Cox vs Brown vs Beech?
Brown should get a decent run you'd think, plus the DPP is pretty handy.
Immediate help!!!!
Few rookies making their debute. Want to rid Eddy. Anyone know who is touted at having a good future??
Quote from: TableKing on June 08, 2017, 07:43:55 PM
Immediate help!!!!
Few rookies making their debute. Want to rid Eddy. Anyone know who is touted at having a good future??
I really like Cox as a footballer, he's also had exposure to senior footy and done well. basketball background should also help him adjust to the pace of AFL.
Quote from: Bully on June 08, 2017, 08:19:32 PM
Quote from: TableKing on June 08, 2017, 07:43:55 PM
Immediate help!!!!
Few rookies making their debute. Want to rid Eddy. Anyone know who is touted at having a good future??
I really like Cox as a footballer, he's also had exposure to senior footy and done well. basketball background should also help him adjust to the pace of AFL.
No doubt we will hear about this :P
Wingard v Ryder
For Sandi...
Quote from: Bully on June 08, 2017, 08:19:32 PM
Quote from: TableKing on June 08, 2017, 07:43:55 PM
Immediate help!!!!
Few rookies making their debute. Want to rid Eddy. Anyone know who is touted at having a good future??
I really like Cox as a footballer, he's also had exposure to senior footy and done well. basketball background should also help him adjust to the pace of AFL.
Ainsworth if you have 50ishK
Quote from: _wato on June 09, 2017, 03:05:06 PM
Wingard v Ryder
For Sandi...
Was think Lynch (GC) myself. Then thought what's the point if I have 19-22 players this and next week. Bottom scores drop off. Not sure much to be gained. Rather Sandi to Gawn straight swap later.
Tom Lynch vs Tom Lynch?
Quote from: shaker on June 09, 2017, 07:26:07 PM
There's 2 haha the GC one has slightly more appeal
Quote from: HoleMeal on June 09, 2017, 07:26:11 PM
Suns
Thanks guys. I was looking at the Crows one but last week was probably the week to grab him when he was under 400k. There is a 20k price difference now between the two (Adel cheaper) and bye's aren't an issue so it comes down to scoring.
Fyfe v Rocky
Lockliff
Cousins' 40 vs. Fisher vs. Myers
Cheers for the lightning fast response GL ;D
Quote from: SilverLion on June 10, 2017, 06:08:50 PM
Cheers for the lightning fast response GL ;D
Haha, didn't even notice. Just came back to the forum and that was the most recent post I saw :P
J.Selwood v D.Martin for my last mid spot?
Quote from: dmac07 on June 13, 2017, 10:49:14 AM
J.Selwood v D.Martin for my last mid spot?
Im going Joel this week, but still have one more mid spot to fill!
Feel like i'll be able to get Dusty cheaper at a later stage.
Coin flip though, seriously.
Quote from: dmac07 on June 13, 2017, 10:49:14 AM
J.Selwood v D.Martin
Would have said Joel for sure normally, but really see no reason why Dusty would slow down. 52% Joel I reckon 8)
Last forward spot
Who out of Heeney, Westhoff (POD), Steele or Lynch (GC). Wingard also a consideration.
Quote from: Ringo on June 13, 2017, 11:59:39 AM
Last forward spot
Who out of Heeney, Westhoff (POD), Steele or Lynch (GC). Wingard also a consideration.
Heeney by a long margin.
Quote from: Bully on June 13, 2017, 12:02:13 PM
Quote from: Ringo on June 13, 2017, 11:59:39 AM
Last forward spot
Who out of Heeney, Westhoff (POD), Steele or Lynch (GC). Wingard also a consideration.
Heeney by a long margin.
Agree
Myers - Ainsworth?
Balic - Bolton?
(Can field 17 if i do the above trades this week)
Or Myers / Balic - Brown
(Will field 16 but take the cash instead)
Quote from: dmac07 on June 13, 2017, 10:49:14 AM
J.Selwood v D.Martin for my last mid spot?
Jelwood imo
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 13, 2017, 12:28:04 PM
Myers - Ainsworth?Witherden
Balic - Bolton?
(Can field 17 if i do the above trades this week)
Or Myers / Balic - Brown
(Will field 16 but take the cash instead)
Go Myers to Witherden from the Lions, should play and more cash!
Quote from: HoleMeal on June 13, 2017, 04:46:49 PM
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 13, 2017, 12:28:04 PM
Myers - Ainsworth?Witherden
Balic - Bolton?
(Can field 17 if i do the above trades this week)
Or Myers / Balic - Brown
(Will field 16 but take the cash instead)
Go Myers to Witherden from the Lions, should play and more cash!
Who is Witherden?
Bit biased here Hazza - brisbane recruited Witherden with pick 23from the Geelong Falcons.
He ha an injury setback early in the season and recently has returned playing NEAFL where he has excelled in the last few rounds. Has been named emergency for Lions indicating he is close to a call up. Expected to debut in the next 2/3 weeks.
Rookie priced at $117k with a D/M DPP.
Ablett vs Rocky?
Houli vs Lloyd?
Buddy vs Heeney?
Have 1 million to spend on one defender and one forward, thinking Houli and Buddy. Lloyd hs DPP but Houli seems to be hitting some good form.
Quote from: Goosey on June 14, 2017, 09:19:50 PM
Houli vs Lloyd?
Buddy vs Heeney?
Have 1 million to spend on one defender and one forward, thinking Houli and Buddy. Lloyd hs DPP but Houli seems to be hitting some good form.
Lloyd next week if you can wait. Heeney this week
Stef vs Heeney?
Can swing Nank, but need to drop Sandi
High ceilings Ablett,Rocky vs durable consistency in Neale,Zorko?
Current midfield is Danger,Pendles,Merrett,Treloar,Beams,Selwood,Fyfe,S.Selwood.
If i trade out Fyfe this week i need 2 of those 4. Head is saying play it safe and take 1 high ceiling in Rocky and then a safe pick in Neale, thoughts?
Something concerning about the idea of having Ablett,Rocky,Beams in one team.
Quote from: Grufflez on June 14, 2017, 09:56:46 PM
High ceilings Ablett,Rocky vs durable consistency in Neale,Zorko?
Current midfield is Danger,Pendles,Merrett,Treloar,Beams,Selwood,Fyfe,S.Selwood.
If i trade out Fyfe this week i need 2 of those 4. Head is saying play it safe and take 1 high ceiling in Rocky and then a safe pick in Neale, thoughts?
Something concerning about the idea of having Ablett,Rocky,Beams in one team.
Rocky and Neale for me I reckon.
Fyfe to Dustbin or GAJ?
Current mids: Danger, Rocky, Sloane, Jelwood, Titch, Pendles, Bont, Fyfe
Quote from: GCSkiwi on June 15, 2017, 02:04:56 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on June 14, 2017, 09:56:46 PM
High ceilings Ablett,Rocky vs durable consistency in Neale,Zorko?
Current midfield is Danger,Pendles,Merrett,Treloar,Beams,Selwood,Fyfe,S.Selwood.
If i trade out Fyfe this week i need 2 of those 4. Head is saying play it safe and take 1 high ceiling in Rocky and then a safe pick in Neale, thoughts?
Something concerning about the idea of having Ablett,Rocky,Beams in one team.
Rocky and Neale for me I reckon.
Fyfe to Dustbin or GAJ?
Current mids: Danger, Rocky, Sloane, Jelwood, Titch, Pendles, Bont, Fyfe
I like Gaz over Dusty
Tossing up between Gaz and Jelwood myself!
Dusty or Gaz? :-\
Been doing my head in over this all week
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 15, 2017, 04:40:01 PM
Dusty or Gaz? :-\
Been doing my head in over this all week
Really hard but shouldn't be much between them. I'd go Ablett.
Quote from: Marcon on June 15, 2017, 03:55:09 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on June 15, 2017, 02:04:56 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on June 14, 2017, 09:56:46 PM
High ceilings Ablett,Rocky vs durable consistency in Neale,Zorko?
Current midfield is Danger,Pendles,Merrett,Treloar,Beams,Selwood,Fyfe,S.Selwood.
If i trade out Fyfe this week i need 2 of those 4. Head is saying play it safe and take 1 high ceiling in Rocky and then a safe pick in Neale, thoughts?
Something concerning about the idea of having Ablett,Rocky,Beams in one team.
Rocky and Neale for me I reckon.
Fyfe to Dustbin or GAJ?
Current mids: Danger, Rocky, Sloane, Jelwood, Titch, Pendles, Bont, Fyfe
I like Gaz over Dusty
Tossing up between Gaz and Jelwood myself!
Jelwood no question for me. I'm just wary of Ablett being a bit fragile, I think he'll score well when on the park, but will he play out the year? My gut says no...
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 15, 2017, 04:40:01 PM
Dusty or Gaz? :-\
Been doing my head in over this all week
Ditto, and despite 2 votes for GAJ, I'm still liking Dustbin more. Just hard paying over 600k for anyone :P
Quote from: GCSkiwi on June 15, 2017, 04:47:05 PM
Quote from: Marcon on June 15, 2017, 03:55:09 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on June 15, 2017, 02:04:56 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on June 14, 2017, 09:56:46 PM
High ceilings Ablett,Rocky vs durable consistency in Neale,Zorko?
Current midfield is Danger,Pendles,Merrett,Treloar,Beams,Selwood,Fyfe,S.Selwood.
If i trade out Fyfe this week i need 2 of those 4. Head is saying play it safe and take 1 high ceiling in Rocky and then a safe pick in Neale, thoughts?
Something concerning about the idea of having Ablett,Rocky,Beams in one team.
Rocky and Neale for me I reckon.
Fyfe to Dustbin or GAJ?
Current mids: Danger, Rocky, Sloane, Jelwood, Titch, Pendles, Bont, Fyfe
I like Gaz over Dusty
Tossing up between Gaz and Jelwood myself!
Jelwood no question for me. I'm just wary of Ablett being a bit fragile, I think he'll score well when on the park, but will he play out the year? My gut says no...
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 15, 2017, 04:40:01 PM
Dusty or Gaz? :-\
Been doing my head in over this all week
Ditto, and despite 2 votes for GAJ, I'm still liking Dustbin more. Just hard paying over 600k for anyone :P
There is only 7k between them ;D
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 15, 2017, 05:11:26 PM
There is only 7k between them ;D
Haha yeah I know, it's just psychological. A number starting with "6" says "overpaying" to me haha.
Because steele is out i need to trade him so i have enough players?
I have 487k to spend
Who should i get out of Wallis, JJK, or other...?
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 15, 2017, 07:51:39 PM
Because steele is out i need to trade him so i have enough players?
I have 487k to spend
Who should i get out of Wallis, JJK, or other...?
Who do you have already? I reckon JJK is a good pick up. Can't stretch a little further for Heeney?
Quote from: GCSkiwi on June 15, 2017, 08:06:50 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 15, 2017, 07:51:39 PM
Because steele is out i need to trade him so i have enough players?
I have 487k to spend
Who should i get out of Wallis, JJK, or other...?
Who do you have already? I reckon JJK is a good pick up. Can't stretch a little further for Heeney?
I would hold off on considering JJK seeing as he is injured and not playing!
Heeney or Macrae?
Quote from: mzunguman on June 15, 2017, 09:03:28 PM
Heeney or Macrae?
I'd rather have Macrae, but you'd want to have both.
Stef or Heeney to go with GAJ
or
Kreuz and Beams?
Quote from: js19 on June 16, 2017, 01:52:39 AM
Stef or Heeney to go with GAJ
or
Kreuz and Beams?
Heeney and the little master for mine.
Steele replacement help?
Can afford any forward, currently have: Yeo, Macrae, Dahlhaus, Nankervis, Higgins. Figured its out of Heeney, Lynch (GC) and Riewoldt (StK).
Quote from: js19 on June 16, 2017, 01:52:39 AM
Stef or Heeney to go with GAJ
or
Kreuz and Beams?
I'm looking at something similar. Plan to move on Steele/Fyfe and have $1,137,000 to play with. Combos I've got are
1. Dusty/Gaz + Stef
2. Dusty/Gaz + Heeney
3. Beams + Kruezer
I would like to sure up my rucks this week and move Nank forward otherwise I may have trouble moving with trades running out. 3 seems to be playing with fire but then Stef still has Archie in the team...
If you had to trade one this week?
Z Fisher or T Williamson?
Quote from: Thewizz71 on June 16, 2017, 12:06:03 PM
If you had to trade one this week?
Z Fisher or T Williamson?
Williamson
Neale v Merrett v Pendles
For next week
Quote from: cotch9 on June 16, 2017, 06:50:16 PM
Neale v Merrett v Pendles
For next week
Pendles.
Goldy or Stef for Steele?
Team is almost complete and have decent cover on all lines.
my question is who do i Trade out??
Fyfe (avg 88.7 in last 7 games) or Steele (avg 83.8 in last 5)
Fyfe has been poor, yes i know i should never trade out a premium ... blah blah blah... but his current scores are so far from premium.
Steele was dropped after a bad game and his TOG has been low.
I'm leaning towards Steele because i've suffered through long enough with Fyfe and so many others are in the same boat, but i cant have a Donut "premium" in the FWD line.
I'm looking at Papley... 99.1 in his last 6 with 2 tons.
Who to bring in?
Jake Lloyd: dropped to $411k and a BE of 50
Docherty: jumped to $634k but only a BE of 75. Will go higher
@Thewizz hope you went Goldy :)
@Keeper Steele easily first to go.
@BBB Really depends how you're sitting trades wise. If you're close to completion I think you have to jump on Dochers now. Lloyd is great value but not if that means going without Dochers.
My question is: Lloyd + $100k vs Roberton. Saints upcoming draw has me strongly leaning towards Roberton. I think I might be in the minority.
It would cost me an extra trade to find the cash but I'm not too fussed as the difference is 6 injury trades instead of 7.
Quote from: batt on June 18, 2017, 09:46:21 PM
@BBB Really depends how you're sitting trades wise. If you're close to completion I think you have to jump on Dochers now. Lloyd is great value but not if that means going without Dochers.
My question is: Lloyd + $100k vs Roberton. Saints upcoming draw has me strongly leaning towards Roberton. I think I might be in the minority.
It would cost me an extra trade to find the cash but I'm not too fussed as the difference is 6 injury trades instead of 7.
Just need 2 more defenders and 1 forward - 14 trades left. Thinking of jumping on docherty, I can't handle not having him. Problem is I'll need to trade Fyfe to get him...
I'd prob go Lloyd v Roberton mate, the $100k and trade handy and I think they'll score similar.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on June 18, 2017, 09:54:06 PM
Just need 2 more defenders and 1 forward - 14 trades left. Thinking of jumping on docherty, I can't handle not having him. Problem is I'll need to trade Fyfe to get him...
I'd prob go Lloyd v Roberton mate, the $100k and trade handy and I think they'll score similar.
$634k is bloody pricey... but he's the second highest averaging player (holy shower) in SC so clearly worth it.
I think the people anticipating a Fyfe turnaround are thinking wishfully. He hasn't shown the ceiling of prior seasons- and generally players will show their true ceiling the first half of the year. 120s mixed with 90s isn't going to cut it.
I've thought more about Roberton v Lloyd and switched back to Lloyd. Think I need to let my cows graze a bit more and use that extra trade to get TJ Lynch off field in a few weeks' time.
Neale vs Merrett??
Merrett vs Zorko
&
T Mitchell vs Dusty :-\
Quote from: Hazza09 on June 19, 2017, 04:34:41 PM
Merrett vs Zorko
&
T Mitchell vs Dusty :-\
Zorko and Mitchell for mine out of those two
Quote from: quinny88 on June 19, 2017, 03:06:13 AM
Neale vs Merrett??
Hmm, think I'd prefer Neale. Both scoring consistently, but like Neale a bit better
Heeney v Wallis v Billings
Pendles Vs Merret Vs Neale
Mids: Danger, Martin, Mitchell, Selwood, Hanners, Rocky, Trelor.
Quote from: enzedder on June 20, 2017, 07:23:40 AM
Heeney v Wallis v Billings
Heeney
Quote from: Ingram on June 20, 2017, 07:40:56 AM
Pendles Vs Merret Vs Neale
Mids: Danger, Martin, Mitchell, Selwood, Hanners, Rocky, Trelor.
Leaning towards Pendles, next 3 at the MCG but it's a close one. I have Zerrett, have a sale or Pendles as the last kid upgrade myself... Neale is mighty tempting and the extra $$$ may come in handy...
On that, Neale v Pendles
who goes out first??
Fyfe OUT - Shiel IN or Black OUT - Laird IN??
Jake Barrett and Luke Ryan
or
Tom Stewart/Jarrod Berry and Callum Brown?
Which combination do you prefer.
Quote from: Keeper27 on June 20, 2017, 04:34:51 PM
who goes out first??
Fyfe OUT - Shiel IN or Black OUT - Laird IN??
Why would you trade Fyfe to Shiel? That makes no sense to me... In any case, far more to be gained going Black to Laird.
Quote from: BomberSam on June 21, 2017, 12:40:50 AM
Jake Barrett and Luke Ryan
or
Tom Stewart/Jarrod Berry and Callum Brown?
Which combination do you prefer.
Assuming these are all bench spots, do you have DPP that could come into play? But probably Barret and Ryan.
Heeney or Yeo?
Quote from: _wato on June 21, 2017, 12:05:05 PM
Heeney or Yeo?
Yeo averages 120 from 6 games at domain this year, with a low of 102, WC play 6/10 at Domain for the rest of the year
But Heeney is looking really good and Sydney are on the up.
Would still go Yeo though
Mitchell v Jelwood v Ablett v Pendles
Need one this week. One before finals for SSelwood
Quote from: billnats on June 21, 2017, 10:26:30 PM
Mitchell v Jelwood v Ablett v Pendles
Need one this week. One before finals for SSelwood
Mitchell and Pendles for me
Quote from: _wato on June 21, 2017, 12:05:05 PM
Heeney or Yeo?
Both :P But if I had to pick one, Yeo.
Quote from: billnats on June 21, 2017, 10:26:30 PM
Mitchell v Jelwood v Ablett v Pendles
Need one this week. One before finals for SSelwood
Jelwood now, Titch later. Could swap Titch for Pendles if he regains his Dependlebury status, but right now Jelly and Titch are better.
Marchbank or Stewart for Ryan
Taranto for Yeo or Heeney
Who sits the pine for Greenswoods score?
Yeo/Wallis/dahlhaus/macrae/wallis/papley?
Quote from: Keeper27 on June 23, 2017, 12:17:15 AM
Who sits the pine for Greenswoods score?
Yeo/Wallis/dahlhaus/macrae/wallis/papley?
Papley
Neale or Pendles?!?
Mountford vs c brown?
Quote from: smashbox on June 23, 2017, 07:44:09 PM
Mountford vs c brown?
Default to the bubble boy, if you're losing a DPP link maybe reconsider
Quote from: smashbox on June 23, 2017, 07:44:09 PM
Mountford vs c brown?
Add Ryan to the field too. Who out of those 3?
Quote from: BLBBLB on June 22, 2017, 03:29:26 PM
Marchbank or Stewart for Ryan
Taranto for Yeo or Heeney
Trade Stewart, Marchbank has better scoring potential.
Yeo - More consistent and chances to go big, worried that Heeney will drop off at some point or get injured.
Who would you put on field. Nank with maric now playing or lynch Gold Coast?
Cheers
Quote from: jrmoo on June 24, 2017, 12:05:58 PM
Who would you put on field. Nank with maric now playing or lynch Gold Coast?
Cheers
Maric is an emergency mate. So Nank still.
Quote from: North Melbournes Finest on June 24, 2017, 12:27:26 PM
Quote from: jrmoo on June 24, 2017, 12:05:58 PM
Who would you put on field. Nank with maric now playing or lynch Gold Coast?
Cheers
Maric is an emergency mate. So Nank still.
Thankfully you will be able to change them around if either Nank is a late out and/or Maric is a late in, as Tigs and Suns play in the last 2 games of the round.
Yeah sweet
Will have to keep an eye on things Sunday
Cheers
Greene v Heeney v Billings?
Quote from: OvensRoastings on June 25, 2017, 11:34:57 PM
Greene v Heeney v Billings?
Exactly same dilemma for me.....
Currently thinking:
Billings > Heeney > Greene
Billings vs Bont?
Billings this week vs Gawn next week?
Lynch > Billings (this week)
Nank > Gawn next week
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 26, 2017, 08:43:49 AM
Billings this week vs Gawn next week?
Lynch > Billings (this week)
Nank > Gawn next week
Nank to Gawn definitely out of those.
Order these for Beams replacement please, can afford anyone :)
Martin, Merrett, Sloane, Neale, Pendlebury, Gibbs, Zorko, JPK, Kelly, Selwood
Quote from: SilverLion on June 26, 2017, 11:03:11 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 26, 2017, 08:43:49 AM
Billings this week vs Gawn next week?
Lynch > Billings (this week)
Nank > Gawn next week
Nank to Gawn definitely out of those.
Order these for Beams replacement please, can afford anyone :)
Martin, Merrett, Sloane, Neale, Pendlebury, Gibbs, Zorko, JPK, Kelly, Selwood
Martin, Neale, Merrett, Pendles, Jelwood?, Kelly?, Sloane, JPK, Zorko, Gibbs
Feels real bad putting Pendles that far down... Honestly a lot of them are a crap shoot really. Martin is a clear frontrunner, and I think Zorko and Gibbs are both clear 'don't consider' (handful of big games making them look good but the reality is they are pretty ordinary 9 times out of 10). Jelwood and Kelly injury clouds, everyone else could go in just about any order.
Best choice to finish mids Pendles or Neale or Zerrett ?
Quote from: shaker on June 26, 2017, 01:21:46 PM
Best choice to finish mids Pendles or Neale or Zerrett ?
Zerrett
Quote from: tkringle on June 26, 2017, 02:58:47 PM
Quote from: shaker on June 26, 2017, 01:21:46 PM
Best choice to finish mids Pendles or Neale or Zerrett ?
Zerrett
Yep he is looking the goods will check out all there runs home they are all quality but he has his nose in front ;)
Billings v Heeney
last forward upgrade WHE to one of these if no carnage this week. Think Billings may be a pod for me whreas I think Heeney could be anything.
Quote from: Ringo on June 27, 2017, 03:47:57 PM
Billings v Heeney
last forward upgrade WHE to one of these if no carnage this week. Think Billings may be a pod for me whreas I think Heeney could be anything.
Think Heeney's the way to go. His tackling numbers give him the edge for me. Also think he has a bit more X-Factor and marking prowess.
Saints only have 4 more games at Etihad.
It's close though, for sure.
Roberton vs Hurley? Getting one in this week then Adams next week once he drops to $510k. Looking for a POD.
Trading Hannan for cash what would be be the better option putting aside price - Beech (Adelaide) or Shoe from Hawthorn looking at it from a JS viewpoint
Hi guys/gals..
Who should I trade first... Parsons or J.Stewart ?
Quote from: strikeforce on June 27, 2017, 05:41:37 PM
Roberton vs Hurley? Getting one in this week then Adams next week once he drops to $510k. Looking for a POD.
Hurley is more POD (4.6%) than Roberton (7.8% and I expect that to increase). Also think Hurley is flying under the radar (I started him 8) )
Quote from: Nolittleblackbook on June 28, 2017, 09:05:49 AM
Trading Hannan for cash what would be be the better option putting aside price - Beech (Adelaide) or Shoe from Hawthorn looking at it from a JS viewpoint
Need a crystal ball for that one.
Neither spectacular.
Quote from: Mark on June 28, 2017, 12:32:54 PM
Hi guys/gals..
Who should I trade first... Parsons or J.Stewart ?
Probably Parsons by a whisker. But both very similar.
Quote from: Mark on June 28, 2017, 12:32:54 PM
Hi guys/gals..
Who should I trade first... Parsons or J.Stewart ?
Neither. Both going up about $30k over the next 2 weeks. Still 9 rounds to go, do you really need to trade one of them this week?
Quote from: Dons on June 28, 2017, 02:28:43 PM
Quote from: Mark on June 28, 2017, 12:32:54 PM
Hi guys/gals..
Who should I trade first... Parsons or J.Stewart ?
Neither. Both going up about $30k over the next 2 weeks. Still 9 rounds to go, do you really need to trade one of them this week?
Nah don't really need to... next week one will have to go for sure to make way for Witherden.
Just wanted to go a week early and go WHO to YEO to complete my team with 7 trades remaining
Greene vs Macrae
Witts, Gawn and Lynch
vs
Witts, Ryder and Greene
Martin or Bont and the $115,000?
Waiting for Jelwood in a week or two to end up with
Danger Rocky JPK Hanners Treloar Pendles Jelwood and Bont / Martin with Greenwood/Witherdon/SPP and enough DPP with Adams and Lloyd and heaps of Fwd/Mid DPPs
Season looking on track for cash league spupremacy $$$$$$
Quote from: tor01doc on June 29, 2017, 09:37:59 AM
Martin or Bont and the $115,000?
Waiting for Jelwood in a week or two to end up with
Danger Rocky JPK Hanners Treloar Pendles Jelwood and Bont / Martin with Greenwood/Witherdon/SPP and enough DPP with Adams and Lloyd and heaps of Fwd/Mid DPPs
Season looking on track for cash league spupremacy $$$$$$
Have to take the Bont and $$ ? I would but already have both
Thanks shaker
I think that is better for long term planning
Love a bargain
Thoughts on Pendles or Bont plus $48K?
Greene v Yeo
Yeo v macrae?
Quote from: backpocket on June 30, 2017, 05:10:16 AM
Yeo v macrae?
Yeo for me.... so glad I got him early!!!
Zerrett v Titch v Neale v Jelwood(in a few weeks) for last mid spot
Quote from: backpocket on June 30, 2017, 05:10:16 AM
Yeo v macrae?
Have Yeo but if had to choose now think I would go Macrae
Quote from: mzunguman on June 30, 2017, 10:37:24 AM
Quote from: backpocket on June 30, 2017, 05:10:16 AM
Yeo v macrae?
Yeo for me.... so glad I got him early!!!
Zerrett v Titch v Neale v Jelwood(in a few weeks) for last mid spot
Neale and Zerrett line ball I choose Neale this week the reason more home games than away
Who to play on field?
Nank lynch or greenwood
Quote from: aces-high on June 30, 2017, 04:41:40 PM
Who to play on field?
Nank lynch or greenwood
Due to current form, Greenwood. I'd be looping him with one of Nank/Lynch if I could though.
Merrett V T. Mitchell V Neale?
Quote from: smashbox on June 30, 2017, 06:34:33 PM
Merrett V T. Mitchell V Neale?
Incredibly tough one, I've had Titchell all season and looking at one of the other two now. Settled with Merrett due to soft run home, so would go him.
Quote from: smashbox on June 30, 2017, 06:34:33 PM
Merrett V T. Mitchell V Neale?
In 35 games (all 2016 and this year)
Z.Merrett: Average 112.5, Max 141, Min 53, 10x >130, 2x <10
109.7 in losses, 120.6 in wins
L.Neale: Average 112.8, Max 154, Min 51, 7x 130, 3x <80
109.5 in losses, 121 in wins
Absolutely nothing splits them. Sometimes there are times where there is no right/wrong answer (and this is probably one of them) but I'd be going for the one where you think their team will win more.
Then there is T.Mitchell, who averages 114.4 in losses and 115.2 in wins this year. I've had him all season and he's incredibly consistent (one sub 100 all season and it was a 85) - just don't watch his live scoring as it's quite frustrating sometimes.
Quote from: SilverLion on June 30, 2017, 06:18:56 PM
Quote from: aces-high on June 30, 2017, 04:41:40 PM
Who to play on field?
Nank lynch or greenwood
Due to current form, Greenwood. I'd be looping him with one of Nank/Lynch if I could though.
I'm loopholing Nank and Lynch! ::)
SPGreen100wood is on the ground at F6. 8)
390k in the bank. Only going for league
Scooter and Taranto to tich and billings (no cash left)
Or scooter to zerret, 180k left over and wait for next week for double trade (means I field parsons for this week)
Quote from: BLBBLB on July 01, 2017, 10:58:10 AM
390k in the bank. Only going for league
Scooter and Taranto to tich and billings (no cash left)
Or scooter to zerret, 180k left over and wait for next week for double trade (means I field parsons for this week)
Do you already have Joel Selwood? Surely you'd be waiting a couple weeks if you can to finish out your mids. In a couple weeks I'll be trading Scott Selwood to Joel Selwood for about 100k.
Quote from: smashbox on June 30, 2017, 06:34:33 PM
Merrett V T. Mitchell V Neale?
Neale for mine.
Beech v Brennan cox for fwd rookie. Who will play more games??
Quote from: tigertops on July 01, 2017, 12:28:30 PM
Quote from: smashbox on June 30, 2017, 06:34:33 PM
Merrett V T. Mitchell V Neale?
Neale for mine.
Beech v Brennan cox for fwd rookie. Who will play more games??
Cox for mine. Kirsten dropped before him, it's his spot to lose.
Yeo vs Billings?
Trying to workout who to play at F5 and who to loophole F6/F7
Option 1 - Play Greenwood, loophole Lynch & Nank
Option 2 - Play Nank, loophole Greenwood & Lynch
Thoughts?
Quote from: tkringle on July 01, 2017, 02:15:59 PM
Trying to workout who to play at F5 and who to loophole F6/F7
Option 1 - Play Greenwood, loophole Lynch & Nank
Option 2 - Play Nank, loophole Greenwood & Lynch
Thoughts?
Option 1 easily I reckon.
Nank struggling to ton up and Lynch up and down like a yo yo.
Makes sense to loophole those 2, that's what I'm doing.
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 01, 2017, 03:08:01 PM
Quote from: tkringle on July 01, 2017, 02:15:59 PM
Trying to workout who to play at F5 and who to loophole F6/F7
Option 1 - Play Greenwood, loophole Lynch & Nank
Option 2 - Play Nank, loophole Greenwood & Lynch
Thoughts?
Option 1 easily I reckon.
Nank struggling to ton up and Lynch up and down like a yo yo.
Makes sense to loophole those 2, that's what I'm doing.
Missed making the change by two minutes.. Hopefully greenwood kills it. Will then need to decide between Lynch and Nank!
Quote from: tkringle on July 01, 2017, 03:12:16 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 01, 2017, 03:08:01 PM
Quote from: tkringle on July 01, 2017, 02:15:59 PM
Trying to workout who to play at F5 and who to loophole F6/F7
Option 1 - Play Greenwood, loophole Lynch & Nank
Option 2 - Play Nank, loophole Greenwood & Lynch
Thoughts?
Option 1 easily I reckon.
Nank struggling to ton up and Lynch up and down like a yo yo.
Makes sense to loophole those 2, that's what I'm doing.
Missed making the change by two minutes.. Hopefully greenwood kills it. Will then need to decide between Lynch and Nank!
Would rather have Greenwood on the ground over those 2 anyways.
Loopholing Lynch and Nank is the way to go. 8)
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 01, 2017, 03:16:08 PM
Quote from: tkringle on July 01, 2017, 03:12:16 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 01, 2017, 03:08:01 PM
Quote from: tkringle on July 01, 2017, 02:15:59 PM
Trying to workout who to play at F5 and who to loophole F6/F7
Option 1 - Play Greenwood, loophole Lynch & Nank
Option 2 - Play Nank, loophole Greenwood & Lynch
Thoughts?
Option 1 easily I reckon.
Nank struggling to ton up and Lynch up and down like a yo yo.
Makes sense to loophole those 2, that's what I'm doing.
Missed making the change by two minutes.. Hopefully greenwood kills it. Will then need to decide between Lynch and Nank!
Would rather have Greenwood on the ground over those 2 anyways.
Loopholing Lynch and Nank is the way to go. 8)
Yeah i missed putting Greenwood on the ground by 2 minutes so can't loop Lynch and Nank. Will take Greenwoods score and gone Lynch over Nank, hopefully the right pick!
me mate is leading by 50.... i've got TMitch and he's got WHE
you reckon i can get up??
Gawn or Grundy ?
same price and Gawn has the harder draw.
Who and Why plz
Quote from: Mark on July 02, 2017, 10:39:48 PM
Gawn or Grundy ?
same price and Gawn has the harder draw.
Who and Why plz
Gawn for me, has a much higher ceiling and scored five 150+ scores last year.
Neale vs Cripps?
&
Rance vs Hibberd?
Quote from: Hazza09 on July 03, 2017, 01:47:24 AM
Neale vs Cripps?
&
Rance vs Hibberd?
Rance probably but there is a slight risk. Hibberd is safer.
Quote from: Mark on July 02, 2017, 10:39:48 PM
Gawn or Grundy ?
same price and Gawn has the harder draw.
Who and Why plz
ceiling
plus Gawn is a better tap ruck man.
This is for a forward position to swing through F5 and F6 with Nank and Greenwood.
Heeny v Steele v Walters v Lynch (GC) Lynch and Steele save money but is the risk worth it.
Neale vs Gawn :-\
Gawn gives me more options as i can swing Nank to F6 and Greenwood to M9/F7.
Getting Neale though will lock up M8 and ill have Scooter at M9
Rance vs Parker
Quote from: whynot102 on July 04, 2017, 04:20:27 PM
Rance vs Parker
Should average well from here on and if Swans can't make the finals then expect early surgeries for some players.
Macrae vs Buddy
And
Z,Jones vs Hibberd
Buddy and Jones for me.
Quote from: Hazza09 on July 07, 2017, 01:58:36 PM
Macrae vs Buddy
And
Z,Jones vs Hibberd
Buddy at that price/BE and Hibbered will be better long term.
Quote from: Ringo on July 03, 2017, 11:29:46 AM
This is for a forward position to swing through F5 and F6 with Nank and Greenwood.
Heeny v Steele v Walters v Lynch (GC) Lynch and Steele save money but is the risk worth it.
Heeney for reliability if you can loophole the others.
Heeney for consistency V Ryder for Ruck Cover (current Witts/Goldy)
Max gawn v Elliot yeo???
Quote from: backpocket on July 07, 2017, 07:40:58 PM
Max gawn v Elliot yeo???
My plan is too get both over the next 2 weeks.
Im only getting Gawn this week as I have Sandi..
If you have good rucks id go Yeo
Quote from: Mark on July 07, 2017, 08:10:37 PM
Quote from: backpocket on July 07, 2017, 07:40:58 PM
Max gawn v Elliot yeo???
My plan is too get both over the next 2 weeks.
Im only getting Gawn this week as I have Sandi..
If you have good rucks id go Yeo
Good rucks = goldy/nank?
Quote from: mzunguman on July 07, 2017, 06:39:18 PM
Heeney for consistency V Ryder for Ruck Cover (current Witts/Goldy)
Heeney has been great but that ruck cover is hard to knock back unless you have a bag of trades
Goldy vs Stef vs Gawn to replace Sandi? Like others I'm worried about Gawn given midfield decimation at Melb
Gawn will be sole ruck at Melbourne whereas Goldy and Stef share rucks atm so Gawn for me.
Josh Kelly vs Cripps
Gawn and Parsons
Vs
Dusty and Witherden?
Sandi/WHE to Gawn/Yeo
OR
Sandi/Newman to Gawn/Docherty
Quote from: Mark on July 09, 2017, 10:39:29 PM
Sandi/WHE to Gawn/Yeo
OR
Sandi/Newman to Gawn/Docherty
I'd go Gawn and Yeo I think.. Missing Docherty is tough, but Newman is looking more like a keeper than WHE.
$600k for final mid.
Mitchell v Zorko v Dusty
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on July 09, 2017, 11:47:52 PM
$600k for final mid.
Mitchell v Zorko v Dusty
Jump on the Zorko train, best POD there is!
Quote from: jfitty on July 09, 2017, 11:48:48 PM
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on July 09, 2017, 11:47:52 PM
$600k for final mid.
Mitchell v Zorko v Dusty
Jump on the Zorko train, best POD there is!
Had Titch since the start, amazingly consistent only under 100 once all year. In my bias opinion would pick him.
Need a replacement for Cripps.
Zorko ($586.7k, BE of 34)
Vs
Dusty ($596.7k, BE of 160)
Vs
Jelwood ($483.1k, BE of 165)
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 10, 2017, 09:41:21 PM
Need a replacement for Cripps.
Zorko ($586.7k, BE of 34)
Vs
Dusty ($596.7k, BE of 160)
Vs
Jelwood ($483.1k, BE of 165)
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 10, 2017, 09:41:21 PM
Need a replacement for Cripps.
Zorko ($586.7k, BE of 34)
Vs
Dusty ($596.7k, BE of 160)
Vs
Jelwood ($483.1k, BE of 165)
Surely can't go past Jelly at that price!
Sandi/WHE to Gawn/Yeo
OR
Sandi/Newman to Gawn/Docherty
Quote from: Mark on July 10, 2017, 10:13:49 PM
Sandi/WHE to Gawn/Yeo
OR
Sandi/Newman to Gawn/Docherty
Tough one... Yeo gets the nod on improved average difference. Docherty gets the nod on VC/C option. Docherty for mine as he is flying. No one better other than Danger.
Hi everyone...
Would J.LLoyd/Sandi
to
Docherty/Yeo
be a silly trade or a good one ??
Really stuck on this one. potentially over the next two weeks leaving me with a full team and 4 trades (trading out SPP and Stewart)
NRoo and Doch
or
Heeney (or greene) and Hurley
Quote from: wetDT on July 13, 2017, 09:40:07 PM
Really stuck on this one. potentially over the next two weeks leaving me with a full team and 4 trades (trading out SPP and Stewart)
NRoo and Doch
or
Heeney (or greene) and Hurley
NROo and Doch
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 13, 2017, 09:49:25 PM
Quote from: wetDT on July 13, 2017, 09:40:07 PM
Really stuck on this one. potentially over the next two weeks leaving me with a full team and 4 trades (trading out SPP and Stewart)
NRoo and Doch
or
Heeney (or greene) and Hurley
NROo and Doch
Champion, that's the way I am leaning. The only thing I am like 6k short, so its a punt that Stewart (BE 43, 84%, exp change +$9900) will make the 6k difference if Doch doesnt go bang (BE 126, 40%, exp change -$1,900).... :-\
Quote from: wetDT on July 13, 2017, 10:08:52 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 13, 2017, 09:49:25 PM
Quote from: wetDT on July 13, 2017, 09:40:07 PM
Really stuck on this one. potentially over the next two weeks leaving me with a full team and 4 trades (trading out SPP and Stewart)
NRoo and Doch
or
Heeney (or greene) and Hurley
NROo and Doch
Champion, that's the way I am leaning. The only thing I am like 6k short, so its a punt that Stewart (BE 43, 84%, exp change +$9900) will make the 6k difference if Doch doesnt go bang (BE 126, 40%, exp change -$1,900).... :-\
Good luck mate - I hope the supercoach gods smile on you!
I'm currently deciding whether to trade Cripps to Zorko and then use 2 trades next week to turn Parsons into a ruck, or grab Jelwood and Ryder this week. Doing my head in. I think Zorko in great form, but Jelwood so cheap. Normally plays well vs Hawks from memory too, so a decent chance to get close to his 160 BE.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 13, 2017, 11:06:32 PM
Quote from: wetDT on July 13, 2017, 10:08:52 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 13, 2017, 09:49:25 PM
Quote from: wetDT on July 13, 2017, 09:40:07 PM
Really stuck on this one. potentially over the next two weeks leaving me with a full team and 4 trades (trading out SPP and Stewart)
NRoo and Doch
or
Heeney (or greene) and Hurley
NROo and Doch
Champion, that's the way I am leaning. The only thing I am like 6k short, so its a punt that Stewart (BE 43, 84%, exp change +$9900) will make the 6k difference if Doch doesnt go bang (BE 126, 40%, exp change -$1,900).... :-\
Good luck mate - I hope the supercoach gods smile on you!
I'm currently deciding whether to trade Cripps to Zorko and then use 2 trades next week to turn Parsons into a ruck, or grab Jelwood and Ryder this week. Doing my head in. I think Zorko in great form, but Jelwood so cheap. Normally plays well vs Hawks from memory too, so a decent chance to get close to his 160 BE.
its about time we all had some sc luck. How are you looking on trades? two trades for two prems is more of a lock than three trades for two in my eyes. especially when one of those prems is nicely under priced.
good luck man
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 13, 2017, 11:06:32 PM
Quote from: wetDT on July 13, 2017, 10:08:52 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 13, 2017, 09:49:25 PM
Quote from: wetDT on July 13, 2017, 09:40:07 PM
Really stuck on this one. potentially over the next two weeks leaving me with a full team and 4 trades (trading out SPP and Stewart)
NRoo and Doch
or
Heeney (or greene) and Hurley
NROo and Doch
Champion, that's the way I am leaning. The only thing I am like 6k short, so its a punt that Stewart (BE 43, 84%, exp change +$9900) will make the 6k difference if Doch doesnt go bang (BE 126, 40%, exp change -$1,900).... :-\
Good luck mate - I hope the supercoach gods smile on you!
I'm currently deciding whether to trade Cripps to Zorko and then use 2 trades next week to turn Parsons into a ruck, or grab Jelwood and Ryder this week. Doing my head in. I think Zorko in great form, but Jelwood so cheap. Normally plays well vs Hawks from memory too, so a decent chance to get close to his 160 BE.
Selwood/Ryder, plus trade in hand easy!
greene vs yeo vs ryder vs wingard vs hoff
:o
Bont v Fyfe?
Simliar ceiling, similar ownership, Fyfe slightly cheaper but more of an injury risk?
Quote from: Jimmykidd on July 16, 2017, 10:24:51 PM
greene vs yeo vs ryder vs wingard vs hoff
Greene > Ryder > Yeo > Hoff > Wingard
Quote from: Rusty00 on July 19, 2017, 10:25:17 AM
Bont v Fyfe?
Simliar ceiling, similar ownership, Fyfe slightly cheaper but more of an injury risk?
Fyfe on form is playing better. If trades are scarce though the safer option would be Bont.
Toss a coin mate!
Quote from: Jimmykidd on July 16, 2017, 10:24:51 PM
greene vs yeo vs ryder vs wingard vs hoff
:o
Yeo > Greene > Ryder > Hoff > Wingard
Quote from: Jimmykidd on July 16, 2017, 10:24:51 PM
greene vs yeo vs ryder vs wingard vs hoff
:o
Yeo (Number 1 fwd and DPP) > Ryder (DPP) > Greene then the rest
Anyone know whats happening with Shai Bolton from Richmond?
Tempted to cut him but hasn't made enough money and is DPP.
Haven't heard anything about an injury but he's magically disappeared?
Shai kicked 5 in the magoos so he would have to be a huge chance for a recall.
Quote from: HappyDEZ on July 20, 2017, 04:24:54 PM
Shai kicked 5 in the magoos so he would have to be a huge chance for a recall.
On emergency bench. Might get a run.
Ryder V Mumford V Grundy V Martin
JSelwood/BEbert
Or
JSelwood/Yeo
Quote from: Mark on July 21, 2017, 06:53:05 PM
JSelwood/BEbert
Or
JSelwood/Yeo
Easily. Despite Ebert being a good POD, must have Yeo at this point.
Bench Nank or TJ for Greenwoods 103?
Take Lairds 83 or field Shaw?
Quote from: TomK on July 22, 2017, 01:19:06 AM
Bench Nank or TJ for Greenwoods 103?
Take Lairds 83 or field Shaw?
I'd probably bench Lynch, can't see him getting much supply without Ablett and Lyons.
And I'd field Shaw. Has gone above 83 5 of his last 6 games.
Still can't decide whether to bring in Fyfe or Bont this week. Fyfe seems like one of those traps where he's played a couple of good games, jump back on, then he spuds :-\
Bringing in Kruz for Nank. locked. 8)
Greenwood to which final forward:
1: Ryder
2: Heeney
3: Hold
Already have Macrae, Dahl, Yeo, Higgins, Buddy.
6 trades going into this week.
Cheers
Quote from: ivolve on July 26, 2017, 12:08:34 AM
Bringing in Kruz for Nank. locked. 8)
Greenwood to which final forward:
1: Ryder
2: Heeney
3: Hold
Already have Macrae, Dahl, Yeo, Higgins, Buddy.
6 trades going into this week.
Cheers
I would go Ryder especially if it gives you ruck cover and he has been in good form lately peeling off 5 out of 6 tons in last 6 games
Hurley or Roberton. Trading Newman to one of them.
Thinking Hurley.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 26, 2017, 01:02:58 PM
Hurley or Roberton. Trading Newman to one of them.
Thinking Hurley.
Hurley the better pick, though saving 100k on Roberton might prove a more profound difference if you're forced to trade in the coming weeks. Depends completely on your trade situation
Cotchin v Sloane v Adams for rocky
Fyfe v Beams?
Beams gives me a good chunk of cash so I hopefully won't need to waste a trade on a downgrade to give me cash for any fix-ups needed - I'm looking at you Rocky >:(
But can I trust him to stay fit though?
1 trade left & 241k
Have Pendles.....
1. Pendles - Mitchell (leaves me treadless and 120k)
2. Mountofrd - Selwood (Keep Pendles)
3. Hold
Whats worse? Being left tradeless with a whole lot of cash or a Pendles on the bench for most likely the remainder of the year? :-\
Quote from: Hazza09 on July 28, 2017, 11:22:39 AM
1 trade left & 241k
Have Pendles.....
1. Pendles - Mitchell (leaves me treadless and 120k)
2. Mountofrd - Selwood (Keep Pendles)
3. Hold
Whats worse? Being left tradeless with a whole lot of cash or a Pendles on the bench for most likely the remainder of the year? :-\
If you don't trade Pendles, who would you have to field?
I'd be inclined to (sadly) use your last trade and grab Mitchell.. Good chance to get a top 3 SC player in.
Quote from: Rusty00 on July 27, 2017, 10:12:57 PM
Fyfe v Beams?
Beams gives me a good chunk of cash so I hopefully won't need to waste a trade on a downgrade to give me cash for any fix-ups needed - I'm looking at you Rocky >:(
But can I trust him to stay fit though?
I reckon the cash saved getting Beams makes him worthwhile - can see them both averaging around the same for the rest of the year.
Kreuz vs Gawn + ~$130K?
QuoteIf you don't trade Pendles, who would you have to field?
I'd be inclined to (sadly) use your last trade and grab Mitchell.. Good chance to get a top 3 SC player in.
I have Zorko aswell, so this week id have Adams swung into M7 to cover Zorko and id have to play Mountford as M8 to cover Pendles.
I can go Mountford - Selwood and when Zorkp returns Adams goes back into defence and i have Pendlebury sitting on my bench as a M9 >:(
Quote from: tkringle on July 28, 2017, 12:42:28 PM
Kreuz vs Gawn + ~$130K?
My dilemma too. Grab the best on the eve of SC finals or go for a value buy?
I really want to get people's thoughts on this. I didn't see his knock to his calf and I know there was doubt about him even playing this week. Should we be worried he may get managed in lead up to finals? Or will they play him as they need to win to stay in?
I feel this trade choice could be defining. If Gawn fires the extra cash will be so valuable. But if he falls...
Start Nank or Lynch this week
Quote from: whynot102 on July 28, 2017, 04:57:32 PM
Start Nank or Lynch this week
Screwed either way i reckon, which is why i'm trading so i don't have to start either..
- Nank has Soldo competing for ruck time
- Lynch has Rance
If i had to, I would go Nank
Dusty or Tich? Rocky needs to go
95 v Greenwood
95 in the bank yeah.
Quote from: BLBBLB on July 28, 2017, 08:00:08 PM
Dusty or Tich? Rocky needs to go
Would've gone Titch personally.
Quote from: enzedder on July 30, 2017, 06:32:09 AM
95 v Greenwood
95 in the bank yeah.
Definitely the 95.
67 vs. Greenwood?
Figured got not much to lose so will probably roll with Greenwood.
Quote from: SilverLion on July 30, 2017, 10:32:23 AM
Quote from: BLBBLB on July 28, 2017, 08:00:08 PM
Dusty or Tich? Rocky needs to go
Would've gone Titch personally.
Quote from: enzedder on July 30, 2017, 06:32:09 AM
95 v Greenwood
95 in the bank yeah.
Definitely the 95.
67 vs. Greenwood?
Figured got not much to lose so will probably roll with Greenwood.
Yeah mate, Greenwood over 67 is a no brainer.
Quote from: BLBBLB on July 28, 2017, 08:00:08 PM
Dusty or Tich? Rocky needs to go
Missed lockout, then downgraded him to Young with a double upgrade coming this week (both Titch and Dusty). Very happy to have dodged his 66
Can't carry JPK anymore been spudding it up.
Kelly vs Neale?
Quote from: smashbox on July 31, 2017, 07:59:16 PM
Can't carry JPK anymore been spudding it up.
Kelly vs Neale?
Lucky if JPK is your biggest issue. That aside i would go kelly
Quote from: no eye deer on July 30, 2017, 12:05:07 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on July 30, 2017, 10:32:23 AM
Quote from: BLBBLB on July 28, 2017, 08:00:08 PM
Dusty or Tich? Rocky needs to go
Would've gone Titch personally.
Quote from: enzedder on July 30, 2017, 06:32:09 AM
95 v Greenwood
95 in the bank yeah.
Definitely the 95.
67 vs. Greenwood?
Figured got not much to lose so will probably roll with Greenwood.
Yeah mate, Greenwood over 67 is a no brainer.
Sorry about that! Put the mocca on him there.
Need a midfielder. Was hoping to get Dusty but now due to having to deal with Witts I'm short.
If I finally flower off Shaw, and play either Ryan or Schaz each week, I can afford $585.9k.
If I get rid of Greenwood instead, I can afford $549.7k.
There are a lot of options, but I've narrowed to the following:
If trade Shaw
- M Crouch ($585.7k): in great form
- Oliver ($554.7k): gun who keeps firing
- Kelly ($554.6k): having a great year, but GWS fading?
If trade either Shaw or Greenwood
- Zerrett ($544.7k):up and down but can go big
- Neale ($534.4k: can go huge and has some home games
- Beams ($463.7k): bloody cheap and scoring well
Help me pick pleas!
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 01, 2017, 09:59:37 PM
Need a midfielder. Was hoping to get Dusty but now due to having to deal with Witts I'm short.
If I finally flower off Shaw, and play either Ryan or Schaz each week, I can afford $585.9k.
If I get rid of Greenwood instead, I can afford $549.7k.
There are a lot of options, but I've narrowed to the following:
If trade Shaw
- M Crouch ($585.7k): in great form
- Oliver ($554.7k): gun who keeps firing
- Kelly ($554.6k): having a great year, but GWS fading?
If trade either Shaw or Greenwood
- Zerrett ($544.7k):up and down but can go big
- Neale ($534.4k: can go huge and has some home games
- Beams ($463.7k): bloody cheap and scoring well
Help me pick pleas!
I have Neale who has been a star all year, but really trying to get M.Crouch into my side this week or next. I'd go Greenwood to Crouch as Shaw is still more reliable than Shaz/Ryan.
Quote from: ivolve on August 02, 2017, 12:21:40 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 01, 2017, 09:59:37 PM
Need a midfielder. Was hoping to get Dusty but now due to having to deal with Witts I'm short.
If I finally flower off Shaw, and play either Ryan or Schaz each week, I can afford $585.9k.
If I get rid of Greenwood instead, I can afford $549.7k.
There are a lot of options, but I've narrowed to the following:
If trade Shaw
- M Crouch ($585.7k): in great form
- Oliver ($554.7k): gun who keeps firing
- Kelly ($554.6k): having a great year, but GWS fading?
If trade either Shaw or Greenwood
- Zerrett ($544.7k):up and down but can go big
- Neale ($534.4k: can go huge and has some home games
- Beams ($463.7k): bloody cheap and scoring well
Help me pick pleas!
I have Neale who has been a star all year, but really trying to get M.Crouch into my side this week or next. I'd go Greenwood to Crouch as Shaw is still more reliable than Shaz/Ryan.
Can't afford Crouch mate if I trade Greenwood. Only afford $549.7k.
Seriously considering playing Ryan or Schaz moving forward - they look solid and better than flowering Shaw
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 01, 2017, 09:59:37 PM
Need a midfielder. Was hoping to get Dusty but now due to having to deal with Witts I'm short.
If I finally flower off Shaw, and play either Ryan or Schaz each week, I can afford $585.9k.
If I get rid of Greenwood instead, I can afford $549.7k.
There are a lot of options, but I've narrowed to the following:
If trade Shaw
- M Crouch ($585.7k): in great form
- Oliver ($554.7k): gun who keeps firing
- Kelly ($554.6k): having a great year, but GWS fading?
If trade either Shaw or Greenwood
- Zerrett ($544.7k):up and down but can go big
- Neale ($534.4k: can go huge and has some home games
- Beams ($463.7k): bloody cheap and scoring well
Help me pick pleas!
I think Beams is your man cheap scoring good 3 games in Brissie got him for Sloane a couple of weeks ago myself , if you will still have trades left next week $$ cash in the bank is the important thing deciding who to flick
Quote from: shaker on August 02, 2017, 10:41:32 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 01, 2017, 09:59:37 PM
Need a midfielder. Was hoping to get Dusty but now due to having to deal with Witts I'm short.
If I finally flower off Shaw, and play either Ryan or Schaz each week, I can afford $585.9k.
If I get rid of Greenwood instead, I can afford $549.7k.
There are a lot of options, but I've narrowed to the following:
If trade Shaw
- M Crouch ($585.7k): in great form
- Oliver ($554.7k): gun who keeps firing
- Kelly ($554.6k): having a great year, but GWS fading?
If trade either Shaw or Greenwood
- Zerrett ($544.7k):up and down but can go big
- Neale ($534.4k: can go huge and has some home games
- Beams ($463.7k): bloody cheap and scoring well
Help me pick pleas!
I think Beams is your man cheap scoring good 3 games in Brissie got him for Sloane a couple of weeks ago myself , if you will still have trades left next week $$ cash in the bank is the important thing deciding who to flick
Beams is my man. Can't be anyone else's man.
He's worth it at the price... worth it if you add on another 100k IMO.... only worry is his shoulder. Apparently he hurt it again towards the end of this week's game but Lion's staff reckon he'll be right to play.
Who to play Ryan v Shaw as D6 ? (played Shaw all year but in light of Ryan posting a monster score and missing out on it this past weekend I'm contemplating putting my $576,500 season beginning premium as D7)
TMitch or Dusty ?
Ryder or Kruz or Gawn ?
Thanks in advance
[/quote]
Beams is my man. Can't be anyone else's man.
He's worth it at the price... worth it if you add on another 100k IMO.... only worry is his shoulder. Apparently he hurt it again towards the end of this week's game but Lion's staff reckon he'll be right to play.
Who to play Ryan v Shaw as D6 ? (played Shaw all year but in light of Ryan posting a monster score and missing out on it this past weekend I'm contemplating putting my $576,500 season beginning premium as D7)
[/quote]
Asking same question. :)
Quote from: Mark on August 02, 2017, 10:48:04 PM
TMitch or Dusty ?
Ryder or Kruz or Gawn ?
Thanks in advance
Dust and Ryder.
JPK to Murphy, burning my last trade
or
Keep the trade and field Fisher
Oliver vs Neale vs Kelly? Need to get rid of JPK
Quote from: tommy10 on August 03, 2017, 08:42:55 PM
Oliver vs Neale vs Kelly? Need to get rid of JPK
Neale
Ryder v Kruezer?
Jacobs vs Big Boy Mcevoy
Need a replacement for Witts and a possible POD.
Mcevoy 2nd best average over the last 3 rounds but a tougher run home.
Jacobs averaging the same as Witts so shouldn't loose too much and has a pretty easy run home
Thanks for your thoughts
Quote from: B. on August 03, 2017, 10:46:51 PM
Ryder v Kruezer?
Ryder
Quote from: bkp130 on August 03, 2017, 11:04:23 PM
Jacobs vs Big Boy Mcevoy
Need a replacement for Witts and a possible POD.
Mcevoy 2nd best average over the last 3 rounds but a tougher run home.
Jacobs averaging the same as Witts so shouldn't loose too much and has a pretty easy run home
Thanks for your thoughts
Sauce
Quote from: Gigantor on August 03, 2017, 08:10:15 PM
JPK to Murphy, burning my last trade
or
Keep the trade and field Fisher
Burn that trade! ;D
Neale vs Fyfe
Quote from: TomK on August 04, 2017, 12:15:23 AM
Neale vs Fyfe
Fyfe mate. His premo scoring is back and is a far better player than Neale
Cotchin vs Murphy vs Parker vs Beams vs Gibbs vs Sloane
Please help!
Neale vs Kelly Vs Oliver vs Beams
Quote from: smashbox on August 04, 2017, 08:48:08 AM
Neale vs Kelly Vs Oliver vs Beams
Beams at that price is so tempting, but his shoulder concerns me.
Gawn v Jacobs v Stef Martin
PLUS
Gawn/Jacobs/Stef Martin and Oliver/Neale/Kelly/Beams
Vs
Sinclair and Dusty
Quote from: Jay on August 04, 2017, 01:52:39 AM
Quote from: TomK on August 04, 2017, 12:15:23 AM
Neale vs Fyfe
Fyfe mate. His premo scoring is back and is a far better player than Neale
Neale will finish in the top 8 mids for the year, very harsh assessment.
Quote from: Jay on August 04, 2017, 01:53:27 AM
Cotchin vs Murphy vs Parker vs Beams vs Gibbs vs Sloane
Please help!
Personally wouldn't want either Murphy or Cotchin in my team.
Sloane is too vulnerable to tags.
Parker not on fire but maybe with JPK out could go better.
Gibbs is solid but plays for Carlton.
Beams is a gun and worth the risk IMO.
Neale worth the extra $70k over Beams for durability sake? Neale does leave me with a couple of hundred bucks though.
Quote from: Huttabito on August 04, 2017, 12:40:00 PM
Neale worth the extra $70k over Beams for durability sake? Neale does leave me with a couple of hundred bucks though.
Depends whether the $70K can be used elsewhere. If so, then save coin.
I would gamble on Beams at this price though.
Beams or Shiel
Kruzer vs Ryder vs Gawn
I'm convinced that Kruzer will score the most against Essendon but Ryder also been good what do u all think?
Gawn is just Gawn
Neale vs Kelly vs Oliver
Gawn vs Stef?
Quote from: n185 on August 04, 2017, 06:46:05 PM
Kruzer vs Ryder vs Gawn
I'm convinced that Kruzer will score the most against Essendon but Ryder also been good what do u all think?
Gawn is just Gawn
Honestly couldn't go wrong with any of them, Kruez under the concussion cloud makes me a bit nervous though, but I like Gawn just cause of his potential and him getting all his midfield back.
Quote from: smashbox on August 04, 2017, 06:53:12 PM
Neale vs Kelly vs Oliver
Neale
Quote from: tommy10 on August 04, 2017, 06:53:22 PM
Gawn vs Stef?
Gawn
Billings Vs NRoo? maybe this was the more appropriate thread to ask :-[
Quote from: Bully on August 04, 2017, 11:53:46 AM
Quote from: Jay on August 04, 2017, 01:52:39 AM
Quote from: TomK on August 04, 2017, 12:15:23 AM
Neale vs Fyfe
Fyfe mate. His premo scoring is back and is a far better player than Neale
Neale will finish in the top 8 mids for the year, very harsh assessment.
Harsh but true.
Quote from: Marstar on August 04, 2017, 07:13:15 PM
Billings Vs NRoo? maybe this was the more appropriate thread to ask :-[
Billings for mine.
Here's one for my draft league, need to pick two from:
Sam Reid, Jamie Elliott, Jake Carlisle & Tom Phillips
Leaning towards Reid and Elliott...
Start Newman or Shaw?
With GWS playing Melbourne tempted to go Shaw.
Ryder and Hurley or s.Martin and Docherty
Quote from: Jimmykidd on August 04, 2017, 07:49:53 PM
Ryder and Hurley or s.Martin and Docherty
Prob Doch and Stef. I think Doch has potential to go higher than Hurley more than Ryder will go above Stef. Plus u don't want to come against a team with Doch and u don't have him
Who does everyone think will score more vsing port? Sloane or greenwood?
Witherden 69 v Greenwood??
Quote from: Dolan on August 06, 2017, 12:51:05 AM
Witherden 69 v Greenwood??
Greenwood just so not really worth the risk imo
Quote from: Dolan on August 06, 2017, 12:51:05 AM
Witherden 69 v Greenwood??
Greenwood
Quote from: GoSaints3 on August 05, 2017, 06:17:33 PM
Who does everyone think will score more vsing port? Sloane or greenwood?
Sloane hopefully, port don't tag. Hope that continues today as I have Sloane also
So i took Ryder in the end :( should of got gawn ahwell still alive in money league...
D. Beams Vs L. Parker Vs R. Sloane Vs M. Murphy
Sloane or Murphy mate..
Who to play...
Nank or WHE ???
With Jelwood out, one trade, elimination final and no cash.... who to bring in?
A) Hanners
B) Gibbs
C) Robbie Gray
D) Wines
Quote from: smashbox on August 07, 2017, 05:58:55 PM
D. Beams Vs L. Parker Vs R. Sloane Vs M. Murphy
Beams
Quote from: Mark on August 08, 2017, 05:54:50 PM
Sloane or Murphy mate..
Who to play...
Nank or WHE ???
Nank
Quote from: billnats on August 08, 2017, 06:40:01 PM
With Jelwood out, one trade, elimination final and no cash.... who to bring in?
A) Hanners
B) Gibbs
C) Robbie Gray
D) Wines
Hanners...in order of ABCD I reckon
Lachie Neale vs Josh Kelly
Quote from: TomK on August 09, 2017, 12:31:52 PM
Lachie Neale vs Josh Kelly
Neale I reckon - higher average (slightly) lower price (though at this stage it might not matter)
Dusty vs Crouch vs Oliver.
All very similar 3 and 5 week averages, although Oliver's is pumped up with his 170 vs North.
Oliver cheapest followed by Crouch, then Dusty. I'm leaning towards Crouch as a pod. Risk it to get the biscuit.
Quote from: no eye deer on August 09, 2017, 09:01:20 PM
Dusty vs Crouch vs Oliver.
All very similar 3 and 5 week averages, although Oliver's is pumped up with his 170 vs North.
Oliver cheapest followed by Crouch, then Dusty. I'm leaning towards Crouch as a pod. Risk it to get the biscuit.
Same order as you have Dusty, Crouch, Oliver.
Quote from: Ringo on August 09, 2017, 09:51:58 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on August 09, 2017, 09:01:20 PM
Dusty vs Crouch vs Oliver.
All very similar 3 and 5 week averages, although Oliver's is pumped up with his 170 vs North.
Oliver cheapest followed by Crouch, then Dusty. I'm leaning towards Crouch as a pod. Risk it to get the biscuit.
Same order as you have Dusty, Crouch, Oliver.
Dusty
Dusty..
What order ?
Nank-Greenwood-WHE ??
Quote from: Mark on August 10, 2017, 11:47:18 AM
Dusty..
What order ?
Nank-Greenwood-WHE ??
Greenwood-WHE-Nank
Quote from: SilverLion on August 10, 2017, 12:31:51 PM
Quote from: Mark on August 10, 2017, 11:47:18 AM
Dusty..
What order ?
Nank-Greenwood-WHE ??
Greenwood-WHE-Nank
Agreed UNLESS Soldo gets dropped. Nank top of the pile in that case for mine.
Quote from: HappyDEZ on August 10, 2017, 01:48:23 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on August 10, 2017, 12:31:51 PM
Quote from: Mark on August 10, 2017, 11:47:18 AM
Dusty..
What order ?
Nank-Greenwood-WHE ??
Greenwood-WHE-Nank
Agreed UNLESS Soldo gets dropped. Nank top of the pile in that case for mine.
Yep if Nank becomes sole ruck then he would go from 3rd to 1st.
Quote from: Ringo on August 10, 2017, 02:54:22 PM
Quote from: HappyDEZ on August 10, 2017, 01:48:23 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on August 10, 2017, 12:31:51 PM
Quote from: Mark on August 10, 2017, 11:47:18 AM
Dusty..
What order ?
Nank-Greenwood-WHE ??
Greenwood-WHE-Nank
Agreed UNLESS Soldo gets dropped. Nank top of the pile in that case for mine.
Yep if Nank becomes sole ruck then he would go from 3rd to 1st.
I would have Nank over WHE regardless
Menegola + Ryder vs Kelly/Zorko + JJK?
Quote from: GCSkiwi on August 10, 2017, 04:27:43 PM
Menegola + Ryder vs Kelly/Zorko + JJK?
Based on the draw, I like this combo more.
Brown vs. Allison vs. Maynard as M10/F8 floater
Parker V Menegola V Heppell V B.Crouch
Quote from: mzunguman on August 10, 2017, 10:17:11 PM
Parker V Menegola V Heppell V B.Crouch
Love Parker. Started slow but coming home strong, will dominate again with JPK out.
Sloane vs Menegola?
I'm deciding between Parker and Beams to replace Selwood. looks to have returned to good form
Rocky as M9 or Betts as F7?
Billings v Josh Kennedy (WCE)
Quote from: batt on August 10, 2017, 04:51:44 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on August 10, 2017, 04:27:43 PM
Menegola + Ryder vs Kelly/Zorko + JJK?
Based on the draw, I like this combo more.
Quote from: john23132 on August 11, 2017, 02:44:44 PM
Billings v Josh Kennedy (WCE)
I'm also now thinking this. Zorko + Billings could be on the cards, Saints have an ok draw to finish too...
Buuut, Billings or Steele?
Quote from: john23132 on August 11, 2017, 02:44:44 PM
Billings v Josh Kennedy (WCE)
JJK has Crows (albeit in WA) for the GF. Not sure how KP forwards have gone against the Crows this year but I suspect it would be one of the tougher gigs getting around.
Quote from: HappyDEZ on August 11, 2017, 04:12:18 PM
Quote from: john23132 on August 11, 2017, 02:44:44 PM
Billings v Josh Kennedy (WCE)
JJK has Crows (albeit in WA) for the GF. Not sure how KP forwards have gone against the Crows this year but I suspect it would be one of the tougher gigs getting around.
Just to add I suppose there is the possibility that WCE are playing for a finals spot whilst the Crows might have an 'off' game by that stage.
Trading Selwood & Lynch
Hannebery & Steele
OR
Rockliff & Greene
Beams vs Sloane vs Hannerbury
Thinking beams as they are vsing GC
Parker over Hannebery
Rockliff and Green
Beams, Sloane, Hanners in that order
Parker then Hannebery.
Sloane vs beams vs coniglio
Quote from: Jimmykidd on August 11, 2017, 06:43:43 PM
Sloane vs beams vs coniglio
For a POD Coniglio otherwise Beams , Sloane well I can't recommend him he help ruin my year :P
Quote from: Jimmykidd on August 11, 2017, 06:43:43 PM
Sloane vs beams vs coniglio
Beams IMO
Know this one shouldn't matter too much but gotta ask again...
Brown vs. Allison vs. Deluca-Cardillo as M10/F8 floater.
Did say Maynard originally, but hes been dropped.
Quote from: Jimmykidd on August 11, 2017, 06:43:43 PM
Sloane vs beams vs coniglio
I say Sloane. Beams is too big of an injury risk in comparison, and Sloane shouldn't be tagged this week.
Quote from: Jay on August 11, 2017, 08:45:50 AM
Rocky as M9 or Betts as F7?
Quote from: Jay on August 11, 2017, 08:45:50 AM
Rocky as M9 or Betts as F7?
Depends on the rest of the line really but I'd say Betts. you're picking either for the chance of a big game, but if they'll also be bench cover then I think most people have ok bench cover in mids, fwds have been dicier.
Sloane or Menegola?
Quote from: tkringle on August 12, 2017, 10:08:03 AM
Sloane or Menegola?
Very tough one.
I'd go Sloane as have Essendon and they shouldn't or can't tag.
With Geelong missing Selwood/Duncan a lot more attention could be given to there second tier mids
Quote from: Mark on August 12, 2017, 10:12:12 AM
Quote from: tkringle on August 12, 2017, 10:08:03 AM
Sloane or Menegola?
Very tough one.
I'd go Sloane as have Essendon and they shouldn't or can't tag.
With Geelong missing Selwood/Duncan a lot more attention could be given to there second tier mids
Thanks. Yeah I've been undecided between these two all week. Was originally going to get in Neale but wouldn't leave me enough $$ to upgrade Lynch to anyone decent..
One more - play Lloyd or Shaz?
Quote from: tkringle on August 12, 2017, 10:23:14 AM
Quote from: Mark on August 12, 2017, 10:12:12 AM
Quote from: tkringle on August 12, 2017, 10:08:03 AM
Sloane or Menegola?
Very tough one.
I'd go Sloane as have Essendon and they shouldn't or can't tag.
With Geelong missing Selwood/Duncan a lot more attention could be given to there second tier mids
Thanks. Yeah I've been undecided between these two all week. Was originally going to get in Neale but wouldn't leave me enough $$ to upgrade Lynch to anyone decent..
One more - play Lloyd or Shaz?
Unfortunately, gotta play Lloyd IMO.
Quote from: GoLions on August 10, 2017, 03:06:13 PM
Quote from: Ringo on August 10, 2017, 02:54:22 PM
Quote from: HappyDEZ on August 10, 2017, 01:48:23 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on August 10, 2017, 12:31:51 PM
Quote from: Mark on August 10, 2017, 11:47:18 AM
Dusty..
What order ?
Nank-Greenwood-WHE ??
Greenwood-WHE-Nank
Agreed UNLESS Soldo gets dropped. Nank top of the pile in that case for mine.
Yep if Nank becomes sole ruck then he would go from 3rd to 1st.
I would have Nank over WHE regardless
So with Soldo playing would the order stay the same...
Greenwood-WHE-Nank still guys ??
Who to bring in?
Billings v Melb
Vs
Sicily vs north
Vs
Kennedy vs Blues @home
Quote from: petefisker on August 12, 2017, 11:00:13 AM
Who to bring in?
Billings v Melb
Vs
Sicily vs north
Vs
Kennedy vs Blues @home
Considering the draw beyond this round I went for Billings
Quote from: Mark on August 12, 2017, 10:46:21 AM
Quote from: GoLions on August 10, 2017, 03:06:13 PM
Quote from: Ringo on August 10, 2017, 02:54:22 PM
Quote from: HappyDEZ on August 10, 2017, 01:48:23 PM
Quote from: SilverLion on August 10, 2017, 12:31:51 PM
Quote from: Mark on August 10, 2017, 11:47:18 AM
Dusty..
What order ?
Nank-Greenwood-WHE ??
Greenwood-WHE-Nank
Agreed UNLESS Soldo gets dropped. Nank top of the pile in that case for mine.
Yep if Nank becomes sole ruck then he would go from 3rd to 1st.
I would have Nank over WHE regardless
So with Soldo playing would the order stay the same...
Greenwood-WHE-Nank still guys ??
Yup. IMO anyways :)
Field 2 in defence
Ryan, Roberton, Lloyd, Scharenberg
Quote from: B. on August 12, 2017, 01:10:43 PM
Field 2 in defence
Ryan, Roberton, Lloyd, Scharenberg
Ryan and Roberton.
Jelwood > Gibbs, Hanners or Menegola?
That my price range.
I've gone Menegola based on the fact Jelwood is out and Danger will get the attention. But with my curse of death you may want to consider Hanners with Swans wanting to continue winning games.
Think I'll join you.
Now lets sit back and watch Hanners knock out 160. Lol
Zerrett or Beams???
Quote from: mzunguman on August 17, 2017, 10:16:08 PM
Zerrett or Beams???
Beams is the one in form, just keep your fingers crossed!
Can't believe I'm asking this at this stage, but:
Dylan Mountford vs Luke Ryan? Got Witherden as a swingman, Hurley and Neale both out. So will play Witherden plus one of the others, surely Ryan?
Surely Ryan will not have 2 bad games in a row.
Jack Martin v Michael Hibberd v Brodie Smith
Quote from: Ringo on August 18, 2017, 09:40:24 AM
Surely Ryan will not have 2 bad games in a row.
Jack Martin v Michael Hibberd v Brodie Smith
For Hurley? I'd go with Hibberd, but I'd have a serious think about whether you can afford to hold, reckon Witherden could be ok cover...
M. Murphy vs L. Parker?
Quote from: GCSkiwi on August 18, 2017, 01:23:33 PM
Quote from: Ringo on August 18, 2017, 09:40:24 AM
Surely Ryan will not have 2 bad games in a row.
Jack Martin v Michael Hibberd v Brodie Smith
For Hurley? I'd go with Hibberd, but I'd have a serious think about whether you can afford to hold, reckon Witherden could be ok cover...
With Witherden confirmed holding last trade.