Stef Martin v Nic Nat
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 22, 2015, 02:28:20 PM
Stef Martin v Nic Nat
Good one! also tossing up these two. I'm with SMartin atm, just because Leuey has gone
This will probably be one of the most asked comparisons by coaches looking at rucks.
There is a not a lot of difference between them. Both now No 1 Rucks at their clubs and both very durable. Martin missed 2 games last year as did Nic Nat. Both very athletic around the ground though Martin virtually is another mid winning a lot of his own ball.
Martin has averaged 110 for last 2 years and Nat averaged 103 last year following Cox's retirement. Question can Nic Nat gain the extra 7ppg to match Martin or will martin drop off slightly. Oh for a crystal ball.
Nat is 3 years younger than Martin so this could be a factor to consider.
Stats averages:
Martin: Kicks 12 Handball 10 Possessions 22 Marks 6 Hit outs 33 Tackles 2
Naitanui : Kicks 6 Handball 6 Possessions 12 Marks 2 Hit Outs 34 Tackles 4
Looking at the Stats has to be Martin. However if strapped for cash Naitanui is $37k cheaper.
Overall favour Martin, but may be biased, based on Martin's possessions around the ground.
Quote from: Ricochet on December 22, 2015, 02:35:32 PM
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 22, 2015, 02:28:20 PM
Stef Martin v Nic Nat
Good one! also tossing up these two. I'm with SMartin atm, just because Leuey has gone
Tough one for sure.
I prefer NicNat personally, because he doesn't need 20+ touches to ton up like Martin does and probably has a slightly higher ceiling too
I think Martin is definitely a better option...
Lions now have a beautifully built midfield with players who know how to rove the ball and i think a full pre season of practise roving to martin i think his HO adv. % will rise 5-10% in addition to his possessions.
However nicnat as was said is 37k cheaper and as I'm strapped for cash i have him in right now. I think NN is set for a major breakout year so taking price and points into account its pretty even. If your not worried about cash Martin is the man.
Have one of my own:
Z.Merrett v T.Greene
Quote from: fasttrack13 on December 22, 2015, 03:39:03 PM
I think Martin is definitely a better option...
Lions now have a beautifully built midfield with players who know how to rove the ball and i think a full pre season of practise roving to martin i think his HO adv. % will rise 5-10% in addition to his possessions.
However nicnat as was said is 37k cheaper and as I'm strapped for cash i have him in right now. I think NN is set for a major breakout year so taking price and points into account its pretty even. If your not worried about cash Martin is the man.
Have one of my own:
Z.Merrett v T.Greene
Very tough one I reckon. So tough that I actually have both in my current side!
I think it all comes down to what role they play for their respective sides next year. NAB Cup will hopefully be a good indication. If one of them spends the majority of the time in the midfield during NAB then I would pick them and if they both do then I would pick both.
So my answer doesn't really help you right now so my suggestion is to go with the cheaper option so the leftover cash can be spent elsewhere so that would be Greene.
On the assumption you can only fit in one
Jelwood vs Sloane
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on December 22, 2015, 04:04:30 PM
On the assumption you can only fit in one
Jelwood vs Sloane
Tough one as there's an argument to have both. Would have to go Jelwood, think he said recently he struggled with injury last year, proven and the addition of Danger should take the heat off a little. Conversely Sloane may attract more attention.
Assuming youve locked Rocky away?
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on December 22, 2015, 04:04:30 PM
On the assumption you can only fit in one
Jelwood vs Sloane
Selwood has the higher ceiling and probably more upside from last years effort so i'd probably pick him over sloane. But, in the past we have gotten selwood cheap later on in the year. Personally i think selwood will out score sloane quite significantly!
My concerns with Jelwood are that he still isn't training and wont til the new year - has several niggles or something that is hampering him so he's clearly nowhere near 100% still
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on December 22, 2015, 04:41:24 PM
My concerns with Jelwood are that he still isn't training and wont til the new year - has several niggles or something that is hampering him so he's clearly nowhere near 100% still
Even still I think there's too much uncertainty around Sloane compared to Selwood. If you're not confident on Selwood or Sloane I'd consider Treloar / Shiel! I expect them to break into the top 10-15 mids in the comp and go 108-112. If you have 3 of Gaz/Pendles/Fyfe/Rocky/Hanners its worth the risk with a POD like treloar or shiel at M4
Sloane if you're picking one to start with. I don't think he's going to be noticeably affected by Dangerfield's departure even if the rest of the Adelaide side will be. He's an inside bull, he's going to rack up a showerload of the footy and plenty of tackles regardless of who is working around him.
Lids vs Martin, of both?
Quote from: Hawker_08 on December 22, 2015, 07:28:18 PM
Lids vs Martin, of both?
Dusty.
Lids is too expensive and has dodgy achilles which will likely see him miss games.
With Martin being cleared by police so there is every probability he will play round 1, So that being the case would have to go Martin $40k cheaper
Martin, could score as well as lids this year and will play more games.
I actually think Lids will have a better year but Dusty is probably safer
Alex Neal Buleen + Fyfe
v
Alex Rance + David Myers
Quote from: Holz on December 23, 2015, 10:44:56 AM
Alex Neal Buleen + Fyfe
v
Alex Rance + David Myers
Rance + Myers for me, even though I don't like Rance. I can see Myers making you 170-190k and scoring pretty well for you to upgrade him for not much to a fallen premo. Would consider someone else for Rance though.
Quote from: Holz on December 23, 2015, 10:44:56 AM
Alex Neal Buleen + Fyfe
v
Alex Rance + David Myers
Rookie + Fyfe
Quote from: fasttrack13 on December 22, 2015, 03:39:03 PM
Have one of my own:
Z.Merrett v T.Greene
Neither but Merrett if you have to have one. Steele and Hopper will take Treloar's inside mid spot and Toby will be stuck playing the same role as in 2015.
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on December 22, 2015, 04:04:30 PM
On the assumption you can only fit in one
Jelwood vs Sloane
Never start with Selwood. He always has a major dip at some point then storms home.
Barlow or Lids?
Some people have good arguments for both sides so I would like to see everyone else's thoughts!
Quote from: Money Shot on December 23, 2015, 06:49:48 PM
Barlow or Lids?
Some people have good arguments for both sides so I would like to see everyone else's thoughts!
easy
Barlow
cheaper and doesnt have these niggling injuries that lids seems to have going at the moment.
Quote from: Holz on December 23, 2015, 06:51:52 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 23, 2015, 06:49:48 PM
Barlow or Lids?
Some people have good arguments for both sides so I would like to see everyone else's thoughts!
easy
Barlow
cheaper and doesnt have these niggling injuries that lids seems to have going at the moment.
The argument is what if Barlow doesn't improve and keeps playing out of position?
So you have to balance that against Lids injuries.
Quote from: Ringo on December 23, 2015, 07:11:53 PM
So you have to balance that against Lids injuries.
That's true! 600k for an injury prone player isn't worth it unless he's name is Gary.
Hibberd v Birchall
I know a lot of you would pick neither but just for arguments sake pick one!
Probably Birchall
Quote from: Money Shot on December 23, 2015, 07:53:45 PM
Hibberd v Birchall
I know a lot of you would pick neither but just for arguments sake pick one!
Hibberd, he has an upside, could potentially increase his average by 10ppg
But I don't seeing Birchall going up by more tha 2-3 ppg
Quote from: fasttrack13 on December 22, 2015, 03:39:03 PM
I think Martin is definitely a better option...
Lions now have a beautifully built midfield with players who know how to rove the ball and i think a full pre season of practise roving to martin i think his HO adv. % will rise 5-10% in addition to his possessions.
However nicnat as was said is 37k cheaper and as I'm strapped for cash i have him in right now. I think NN is set for a major breakout year so taking price and points into account its pretty even. If your not worried about cash Martin is the man.
Have one of my own:
Z.Merrett v T.Greene
For Me Greene easily
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on December 22, 2015, 04:04:30 PM
On the assumption you can only fit in one
Jelwood vs Sloane
Sloane easily
Quote from: Hawker_08 on December 22, 2015, 07:28:18 PM
Lids vs Martin, of both?
I prefer lids but I suspect the saving of money will force me to pick dusty
I have 2 :o
Titch vs Shiel
Houli vs Rance
Quote from: Money Shot on December 23, 2015, 06:49:48 PM
Barlow or Lids?
Some people have good arguments for both sides so I would like to see everyone else's thoughts!
Lids by a street
I am off Barlow though and there is absolutely no hope of him getting a gig in my side
Quote from: Money Shot on December 23, 2015, 07:53:45 PM
Hibberd v Birchall
I know a lot of you would pick neither but just for arguments sake pick one!
Right now whoever cheaper but preseason form is the real decider for
Me
Parker v Wines
Both underpriced due to injury affected seasons in 2015. Who is the better pick though and why?
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 24, 2015, 01:07:18 AM
Parker v Wines
Both underpriced due to injury affected seasons in 2015. Who is the better pick though and why?
I like Parker. Wines started to get tagged last season which dropped his scores a lot where as Parker wont get tagged as much with guys like Kennedy on the team.
Hibberd and Yeo v McVeigh and Seedsman
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 09:51:03 AM
Hibberd and Yeo v McVeigh and Seedsman
McVeigh + Seedsman definitely, it it was anyone but Hibberd then I'd go with the Yeo option, I personally like Rich.
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 24, 2015, 01:07:18 AM
Parker v Wines
Both underpriced due to injury affected seasons in 2015. Who is the better pick though and why?
Wines can't handle the tag yet Shiel has had 2 years to deal with it and has improved both years. Expect him to do the same again! So Shiel for me.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on December 24, 2015, 10:43:43 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 09:51:03 AM
Hibberd and Yeo v McVeigh and Seedsman
McVeigh + Seedsman definitely, it it was anyone but Hibberd then I'd go with the Yeo option, I personally like Rich.
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 24, 2015, 01:07:18 AM
Parker v Wines
Both underpriced due to injury affected seasons in 2015. Who is the better pick though and why?
Wines can't handle the tag yet Shiel has had 2 years to deal with it and has improved both years. Expect him to do the same again! So Shiel for me.
Shiel could be a good pick too mate but was wondering about Parker v Wines ;)
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 24, 2015, 10:56:45 AM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on December 24, 2015, 10:43:43 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 09:51:03 AM
Hibberd and Yeo v McVeigh and Seedsman
McVeigh + Seedsman definitely, it it was anyone but Hibberd then I'd go with the Yeo option, I personally like Rich.
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 24, 2015, 01:07:18 AM
Parker v Wines
Both underpriced due to injury affected seasons in 2015. Who is the better pick though and why?
Wines can't handle the tag yet Shiel has had 2 years to deal with it and has improved both years. Expect him to do the same again! So Shiel for me.
Shiel could be a good pick too mate but was wondering about Parker v Wines ;)
Id still go Shiel ;)
Nah, out of the 2 i would go Wines. Will probably improve along with Port this year and Gray/Boak are ahead of him in terms of being tagged.
Im still stuck on Nicnat vs Bennell (Via Burger). Pros and cons would be fantastic!
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 01:10:55 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.
Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
Can of Coke easily but would prefer can of Pepsi Max.
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:21:12 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 01:10:55 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.
Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...
The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.
Quote from: Grufflez on December 24, 2015, 03:47:45 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:21:12 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 01:10:55 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.
Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...
The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.
Your not wrong. Can plays for the team, as opposed to Trav who is plays for himself!
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 04:16:14 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on December 24, 2015, 03:47:45 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:21:12 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 01:10:55 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.
Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...
The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.
with
Your not wrong. Can plays for the team, as opposed to Trav who is plays for himself!
Too childish? :P
Quote from: Grufflez on December 24, 2015, 04:48:49 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 04:16:14 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on December 24, 2015, 03:47:45 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:21:12 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 01:10:55 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.
Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...
The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.
with
Your not wrong. Can plays for the team, as opposed to Trav who is plays for himself!
Too childish? :P
ahahha na, spot on!!!
Quote from: Grufflez on December 24, 2015, 04:48:49 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 04:16:14 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on December 24, 2015, 03:47:45 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:21:12 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 24, 2015, 01:10:55 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
A can of coke consistently delivers week in week out where we Travis Cloke is too up and down for me.
Yeah, can of coke doesnt get in the way either...
The can will probably draw 2 thirsty defenders though, unless Big Trav has a beer in his back pocket i reckon the can has him beat.
Both won't kick goals so that's a non argument.
with
Your not wrong. Can plays for the team, as opposed to Trav who is plays for himself!
Too childish? :P
lmao
Can of Coke
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
The can of coke works harder and longer and has no trouble going between the big sticks. ;)
R Gray vs Rockliff?
Quote from: Peter on December 27, 2015, 10:30:42 AM
R Gray vs Rockliff?
Rockliff. Cheaper and can score more. I do like Gray but compared the rocky he is a no.
Quote from: The_Captain on December 24, 2015, 01:07:27 PM
Travis Cloke V a can of Coke ?
A massive lol.
I do know that 1 past SC winner is seriously considering starting big Trav.
A gutsy move but sometimes these picks can pay off.
I think the can of coke wins this X v Y.
Leaving Goldie out of the equation for financial reasons, nominate which of the following ruck combinations appeals most:
1. Mumford/Martin
2. Mumford/Jacobs
3. Mumford/Nicnat
4. Mumford/Luenberger
5. Mumford/anybody else
Three wise men currently hold a discussion on the SUPERCOACH site and unanimously agree that Shane Mumford is, far and away, the ruck-lock of the century for next year, provided of course that he can stay on the ground and not trip over a blade of grass or something. Their certainty took me a bit by surprise considering that they really didn't offer much of a rationale except that he's a great ruckman and overdue to have an injury-free year, and when he's injury-free he consistently scores really big, all of which is true enough. Anybody agree with them?
To risky in my opinion, if you really want to pick him you would have to have Leuy in the forward line for cover.
I really want to lock him in but he is way to injury prone for me. I don't have Leuy at this stage and there fore are not taking the risk.
Nic Nat and Martin for me.
Bartel V Simpson.
Quote from: Money Shot on December 27, 2015, 01:08:29 PM
I really want to lock him in but he is way to injury prone for me. I don't have Leuy at this stage and there fore are not taking the risk.
Nic Nat and Martin for me.
Bartel V Simpson.
Simpson for me, he might average a few points less but I think he will play more games
Quote from: Money Shot on December 27, 2015, 01:08:29 PM
I really want to lock him in but he is way to injury prone for me. I don't have Leuy at this stage and there fore are not taking the risk.
Nic Nat and Martin for me.
Bartel V Simpson.
Bartel. I think he will average close to 100 and up until last year he has proved to be very durable. Cats rarely rest their older players as we've seen with Enright.
I think Simpson will average closer to 90.
One I am agonising a little bit over Dahlhaus v Zorko.
Will Dahlhaus mid time suffer with Libbas return. Conversely will Zorko get the same mid time at brisbane with a fully fit Brisbane midfield. Think both will slip a little for this reason but who will slip further.
Quote from: Ringo on December 27, 2015, 03:24:17 PM
One I am agonising a little bit over Dahlhaus v Zorko.
Will Dahlhaus mid time suffer with Libbas return. Conversely will Zorko get the same mid time at brisbane with a fully fit Brisbane midfield. Think both will slip a little for this reason but who will slip further.
I like Dahl more. Think Libba will take a few points but he's natural improvement will gain a few. I think he will average around the same. Zorko wouldn't be a bad pick either though. I just think that with all the mids Brisbane have I don't see him getting as much time. It is really a tough one but don't think you could go wrong with either.
Quote from: Ringo on December 27, 2015, 03:24:17 PM
One I am agonising a little bit over Dahlhaus v Zorko.
Will Dahlhaus mid time suffer with Libbas return. Conversely will Zorko get the same mid time at brisbane with a fully fit Brisbane midfield. Think both will slip a little for this reason but who will slip further.
Zorko doesn't score well with both Rockliff and Beams in the same team with him. I don't think Libba returning will have too much of an effect on Dahlhaus' scoring.
Dahlhaus easily for me unless one of Rocky or Beams gets an LTI between now and the start of the season.
I agree with Dahlhaus, though my reason is that I think Libba has more of an effect on the SC points of Picken and Wallis than Dahl.
Matthew Boyd v Jarrad Mcveigh
&&&&& Rance v anyone under $523k (Simpson, Birch, Hurley, Laird) etc
Quote from: _wato on December 27, 2015, 04:40:31 PM
Matthew Boyd v Jarrad Mcveigh
&&&&& Rance v anyone under $523k (Simpson, Birch, Hurley, Laird) etc
Mcveigh
Enright 8) I think he has been a great scorer for years now.
Quote from: _wato on December 27, 2015, 04:40:31 PM
Matthew Boyd v Jarrad Mcveigh
&&&&& Rance v anyone under $523k (Simpson, Birch, Hurley, Laird) etc
McVeigh. I think Boyd's scoring output will drop a bit and he will get rested from time to time.
K Kolodjashnij. The returning GC mids won't have any effect on his scoring as he plays as a rebounding defender. Will average close to 100.
Agree, Ben. I have had KK pencilled in since the middle of last year, this will be his breakout year.
:)
MvVeigh and Hurley in a year where he starts to play like a hot Brian Lake. ;)
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 27, 2015, 05:04:24 PM
Quote from: _wato on December 27, 2015, 04:40:31 PM
Matthew Boyd v Jarrad Mcveigh
&&&&& Rance v anyone under $523k (Simpson, Birch, Hurley, Laird) etc
McVeigh. I think Boyd's scoring output will drop a bit and he will get rested from time to time.
K Kolodjashnij. The returning GC mids won't have any effect on his scoring as he plays as a rebounding defender. Will average close to 100.
Agree KK capable of improving again this year. Could be a good POD. McVeigh over Boyd. Of others only Simpson I would consider.
Quote from: Ringo on December 27, 2015, 03:24:17 PM
One I am agonising a little bit over Dahlhaus v Zorko.
Will Dahlhaus mid time suffer with Libbas return. Conversely will Zorko get the same mid time at brisbane with a fully fit Brisbane midfield. Think both will slip a little for this reason but who will slip further.
I think Dahlhaus got more midfield time upon the departure of griffen rather than libba being out... It was more mitch wallis who benefited greatly imo. Probably would prefer dahlhaus but zorko is a chance for improved midfield time now that redden is gone. So it's pretty even. they both should average around 100 give or take a few points.
Quote from: _wato on December 27, 2015, 04:40:31 PM
Matthew Boyd v Jarrad Mcveigh
&&&&& Rance v anyone under $523k (Simpson, Birch, Hurley, Laird) etc
I dont really like either even though theyre top 5 defenders youll get them much cheaper. Would go Mcveigh though
Definitely not rance... KPB nonono.
Id go yeo/macmillan or bartel for uner 523k theyre all 90-105 players for me.
Luke Parker v Dylan Shiel
Quote from: fasttrack13 on December 28, 2015, 02:45:03 PM
Luke Parker v Dylan Shiel
Both seem too risky to start with given all of the value mids around.
If the choice for SC draft was there i'd go with Parker by a nose because of his 108 season in 2014 and because Shiel will probably get more opposition attention in the absence of Treloar.
Sidebottom vs Sloane (Already have Rocky, don't want Jelwood)
Quote from: Gigantor on December 29, 2015, 01:42:13 PM
Sidebottom vs Sloane (Already have Rocky, don't want Jelwood)
Sloane for me. He has a lot more upside.
Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko
Quote from: Money Shot on December 29, 2015, 03:35:10 PM
Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko
Simpson, Sloane, Bennell
Quote from: Money Shot on December 29, 2015, 03:35:10 PM
Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko
Laird, sloane, bennell
Quote from: Money Shot on December 29, 2015, 03:35:10 PM
Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko
Simpson: proven 90+ and Laird might be effected by Jaensch/Smith
Selwood: Solid 115-118 player for years, will bounce back for sure now that he has help.
Zorko: Over Bennell because Bennell has moved team and is an uncertainty.
Quote from: Money Shot on December 29, 2015, 03:35:10 PM
Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko
Uhh, none of the first two. Sorry :P Think there's better options than Laird for the money and Simpson will come down a lot in price if his scoring pattern keeps up.
Sloane over Selwood, Joel still isn't 100% fit and also usually has a drop in price.
Bennell has a higher ceiling, Zorko will be more consistent I think.
Quote from: Money Shot on December 29, 2015, 03:35:10 PM
Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko
Simpson - more reliable and lots of questions over Adelaides back setup
Sloane has more upside and Selwood a slow starter
Bennell possible to be top fwd for the year and odds on to avg 100+.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on December 28, 2015, 02:45:03 PM
Luke Parker v Dylan Shiel
None of the above
Quote from: Gigantor on December 29, 2015, 01:42:13 PM
Sidebottom vs Sloane (Already have Rocky, don't want Jelwood)
Sloane
Quote from: ben_020285 on December 29, 2015, 04:00:23 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 29, 2015, 03:35:10 PM
Laird V Simpson
Selwood V Sloane
Bennell V Zorko
Simpson, Sloane, Bennell
:-[
Help please guys, I'm really bad at this.
Shiel and Leuenberger v Myers and Naitanui Points wise, and financial gain (just a rough idea) as well please. Thanks in advance ;D :) ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on December 31, 2015, 01:27:40 AM
:-[
Help please guys, I'm really bad at this.
Shiel and Leuenberger v Myers and Naitanui Points wise, and financial gain (just a rough idea) as well please. Thanks in advance ;D :) ;)
shiel 100-105 and luey 90+ = 190-195
Myers 80-85 and nicnat 100-110 = 180-195.
more variation in myers and nicnat so would make more sense to go with shiel and leuy. also the dpp benefit.
Quote from: crowls on December 31, 2015, 03:59:08 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on December 31, 2015, 01:27:40 AM
:-[
Help please guys, I'm really bad at this.
Shiel and Leuenberger v Myers and Naitanui Points wise, and financial gain (just a rough idea) as well please. Thanks in advance ;D :) ;)
shiel 100-105 and luey 90+ = 190-195
Myers 80-85 and nicnat 100-110 = 180-195.
more variation in myers and nicnat so would make more sense to go with shiel and leuy. also the dpp benefit.
If we run with those points for each you'd have to take option 2. At least NN at 105-110 is a keeper in the rucks. 90 is very generous for luey but still not forward keeper level, same goes with 100-105 for Shiel, not good enough for M8.
I still can't decide between T.Mitch vs Shiel !
Quote from: Grufflez on December 31, 2015, 07:33:59 AM
I still can't decide between T.Mitch vs Shiel !
I'd go with T.Mitch, although both can be a little inconsistent
Pendles v Sloane/Selwood
Is Pendles worth the extra money if he is going to play more of a forward role this season?
Quote from: Money Shot on December 31, 2015, 11:40:14 AM
Pendles v Sloane/Selwood
Is Pendles worth the extra money if he is going to play more of a forward role this season?
I really can't see this 'forward role' being that big of a deal
He is still almost guaranteed to be an elite scorer this year
I'd go with Pendles
Bennell v Dahlhous.
Bennell
Pendlebury vs Beams?
Quote from: Big Mac on December 31, 2015, 12:14:36 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 31, 2015, 11:40:14 AM
Pendles v Sloane/Selwood
Is Pendles worth the extra money if he is going to play more of a forward role this season?
I really can't see this 'forward role' being that big of a deal
He is still almost guaranteed to be an elite scorer this year
I'd go with Pendles
Do you mean sweeping backmen? i have not yet seen anything about him playing forward? even when he rests u would expect back not forward? fill me in please :)
Quote from: Grufflez on December 31, 2015, 01:55:44 PM
Quote from: Big Mac on December 31, 2015, 12:14:36 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 31, 2015, 11:40:14 AM
Pendles v Sloane/Selwood
Is Pendles worth the extra money if he is going to play more of a forward role this season?
I really can't see this 'forward role' being that big of a deal
He is still almost guaranteed to be an elite scorer this year
I'd go with Pendles
Do you mean sweeping backmen? i have not yet seen anything about him playing forward? even when he rests u would expect back not forward? fill me in please :)
I read it in the Collingwood forum and they would have a pretty good idea of it I reckon!
Quote from: Money Shot on December 31, 2015, 02:43:57 PM
Quote from: Grufflez on December 31, 2015, 01:55:44 PM
Quote from: Big Mac on December 31, 2015, 12:14:36 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 31, 2015, 11:40:14 AM
Pendles v Sloane/Selwood
Is Pendles worth the extra money if he is going to play more of a forward role this season?
I really can't see this 'forward role' being that big of a deal
He is still almost guaranteed to be an elite scorer this year
I'd go with Pendles
Do you mean sweeping backmen? i have not yet seen anything about him playing forward? even when he rests u would expect back not forward? fill me in please :)
I read it in the Collingwood forum and they would have a pretty good idea of it I reckon!
Pendles can be very damaging when he plays forward
And FWIW I'd say Sloane, Beams, Jelwood are all slightly better value for money than Pendles is, and all should be around that top 8-10 range in the midfield by the end of the season. Personally I see Pendles and Jelwood as upgrade targets myself though. Just can't fit them in when you also have guys like Gaz, Rocky, Libba, Crouch, and JOM
:-\
Three will stay but one must go, but which one ??
K Kolodjashnij J Bartel B Smith P Seedsman
I can put up cases for and against all of them equally but keep coming back to one sticking point.
That is Bartel's age. Am I making too much of it guys ?? ??
:(
Quote from: enzedder on December 31, 2015, 03:47:05 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 31, 2015, 12:16:53 PM
Bennell v Dahlhous.
Dahlhaus but I like both
Quote from: GraysFan on December 31, 2015, 01:48:28 PM
Pendlebury vs Beams?
Beams but I like both
If he stays straight, Bennell by the length of the Australian shoreline. Out of Pendles and Beams,
whichever one you best afford first and then the other next
Quote from: GoLions on December 31, 2015, 02:49:42 PM
And FWIW I'd say Sloane, Beams, Jelwood are all slightly better value for money than Pendles is, and all should be around that top 8-10 range in the midfield by the end of the season. Personally I see Pendles and Jelwood as upgrade targets myself though. Just can't fit them in when you also have guys like Gaz, Rocky, Libba, Crouch, and JOM
Hi GL, just a little curious on how you rate JOM. So if he were not named Rd.1 but certain to definitely
line up in Rds,2 or 3 would you select him ??
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on December 31, 2015, 11:32:49 PM
:-\
Three will stay but one must go, but which one ??
K Kolodjashnij J Bartel B Smith P Seedsman
I can put up cases for and against all of them equally but keep coming back to one sticking point.
That is Bartel's age. Am I making too much of it guys ?? ??
:(
Very tough call! Smith seems the lock from the 4 I think. So 2 of Jimmy/Seeds/Kk...
I think I would go Smith, KK and Jimmy from those if cash is no worry. Seeds is great value but too many question marks at this stage.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on December 31, 2015, 11:41:54 PM
Quote from: GoLions on December 31, 2015, 02:49:42 PM
And FWIW I'd say Sloane, Beams, Jelwood are all slightly better value for money than Pendles is, and all should be around that top 8-10 range in the midfield by the end of the season. Personally I see Pendles and Jelwood as upgrade targets myself though. Just can't fit them in when you also have guys like Gaz, Rocky, Libba, Crouch, and JOM
Hi GL, just a little curious on how you rate JOM. So if he were not named Rd.1 but certain to definitely
line up in Rds,2 or 3 would you select him ??
I don't plan on starting him atm, but he should still be great value nonetheless
Currently looking at a starting midfield of Gaz, Rocky, Sloaney, Beams, Libba, Crouch, rookies. But also want Myers so we'll see what happens haha
Quote from: Money Shot on December 31, 2015, 11:40:14 AM
Pendles v Sloane/Selwood
Is Pendles worth the extra money if he is going to play more of a forward role this season?
Pendles
Quote from: Money Shot on December 31, 2015, 12:16:53 PM
Bennell v Dahlhous.
Dahlhaus. Bennell always misses multiple games.
Quote from: GraysFan on December 31, 2015, 01:48:28 PM
Pendlebury vs Beams?
Pendles. Beams always misses multiple games.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on December 31, 2015, 11:32:49 PM
:-\
Three will stay but one must go, but which one ??
K Kolodjashnij J Bartel B Smith P Seedsman
I can put up cases for and against all of them equally but keep coming back to one sticking point.
That is Bartel's age. Am I making too much of it guys ?? ??
:(
KK, Bartel and Smith. Goodbye Seedsman.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on December 31, 2015, 11:32:49 PM
:-\
Three will stay but one must go, but which one ??
K Kolodjashnij J Bartel B Smith P Seedsman
I can put up cases for and against all of them equally but keep coming back to one sticking point.
That is Bartel's age. Am I making too much of it guys ?? ??
:(
Can't we all.
In my opinion KK and Smith would be locks. With all the Suns players fit and the inclisopn of Rosa KK should revert to the running and kicking game which is SC friendly. Smith should revert to his All Australian role and score well.
That leaves Bartel and Seedsman. What will Seedsman's role be at the Crows probably need to watch NAB cup to get an idea and whether there is scope to increase his average. (has been 67.5 and 60.1 for the last 2 years).
Bartel as you say age is a factor but weighing against that is the fact that prior to last year he has not averaged less than 95 for last 11 years. Taking out his injury effected score in Round 3 he still averaged 88 last year,
So based on Stats it would be Seedsman
Starting with Stef Martin as Ruck 1. (My opinion Goldy too expensive and concerned that very few Top Ruck are Top rucks the following season. Great debate in the to start Goldstein thread)
So Jacobs or Nat as R2?
Quote from: Ringo on January 01, 2016, 10:28:06 AM
Starting with Stef Martin as Ruck 1. (My opinion Goldy too expensive and concerned that very few Top Ruck are Top rucks the following season. Great debate in the to start Goldstein thread)
So Jacobs or Nat as R2?
Great call Ringo.
Further to the top scoring rucks and there following seasons.
These stats are from a highly respected coach from a different SC site.
2007. Dean Cox, 99. Followed up with 112.
2008. Cox, 112. Again Cox had the top average, but 13th in aggregate, only played 11 games.
2009. Cox, 111. Then backed up with a 88.
2010. Sandilands, 114. Then went 4th with a average of 111 the following year.
2011. Cox, 122. Then again went 4th with 112.
2012. Nic Nat, 114. Followed up 8th with 96.
2013. Minson, 114. Then went 9th at 93.
2014. Jacobs, 115. Then finished 4th with 107.
I'm still tipping Goldy to be the best ruck again this year but history not on his side.
695k is just to much coin to part with up front.
Quote from: Ringo on January 01, 2016, 10:28:06 AM
Starting with Stef Martin as Ruck 1. (My opinion Goldy too expensive and concerned that very few Top Ruck are Top rucks the following season. Great debate in the to start Goldstein thread)
So Jacobs or Nat as R2?
Nat. Or luey, then grab goldy when (if?) he drops by moving luey fwd and cashing in a fwd or mid mid pricer or 2.
I took a look at jacobs for a bit.
He has the round 13 bye, if you start leuy in the forward line, he has the round 14 bye, and martin has the round 15.
So each round you will have two playing ruckman
However i was convinced reading that with danger gone he would lose points from not as many effective ruck taps.
I would personally go with nicnat out of the two :)
Quote from: Ringo on January 01, 2016, 10:28:06 AM
Starting with Stef Martin as Ruck 1. (My opinion Goldy too expensive and concerned that very few Top Ruck are Top rucks the following season. Great debate in the to start Goldstein thread)
So Jacobs or Nat as R2?
Out of the two you quoted definitely Nicnat. But if I was looking to upgrade to Goldstein I would go Mumford without any hesitation. Best chance of a parellel swap. Think from memory he was on fire when he went down with injury this year and his price at the time was very close to Goldy's. You'd have to check the stats on this as I'm going purely on memory. Cheers and best of luck ;)
Not willing to spend $695k on Goldy but are willing to spend $597k on a bloke who's put 18 months of good footy together? Has had injuries in the past and relies on a load of possessions to score well? As a ruckman may I add?
That's like saying you'd go past Ablett in all those years he went massive and picking a bloke like Priddis. Good and serviceable but not the absolute super premium status of Ablett.
Good luck making the swap when Goldy does the same as this year!! No reason to say he won't. And your reply will say, 'he won't get as many monster scores', and look at the history of past ruckman, but you have to remember he scored 44 against Sandi and without that he averaged over 134. No ruckman has ever done that. Take a few points off that average and I cannot see him going under 120-125 which a few ruckman have done in the past. No different
Quote from: _wato on January 01, 2016, 10:56:37 PM
Not willing to spend $695k on Goldy but are willing to spend $597k on a bloke who's put 18 months of good footy together? Has had injuries in the past and relies on a load of possessions to score well? As a ruckman may I add?
That's like saying you'd go past Ablett in all those years he went massive and picking a bloke like Priddis. Good and serviceable but not the absolute super premium status of Ablett.
Good luck making the swap when Goldy does the same as this year!! No reason to say he won't. And your reply will say, 'he won't get as many monster scores', and look at the history of past ruckman, but you have to remember he scored 44 against Sandi and without that he averaged over 134. No ruckman has ever done that. Take a few points off that average and I cannot see him going under 120-125 which a few ruckman have done in the past. No different
This. Although Martin is a good pick as well if you're not starting with Goldy I don't see you getting him in easily.
::)
Isaac Heeney v Isaac Heeney
I put it this way because I believe he is capable of doing absolutely anything next year. Scored 117 in his last home and away, I really believe he will be the biggest breakout of the new season. Does anybody know anything about him or have any thoughts or opinions on this please ?? ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 01, 2016, 11:57:08 PM
::)
Isaac Heeney v Isaac Heeney
I put it this way because I believe he is capable of doing absolutely anything next year. Scored 117 in his last home and away, I really believe he will be the biggest breakout of the new season. Does anybody know anything about him or have any thoughts or opinions on this please ?? ;)
Heeney.
:)
Top call Goosey ;)
Dunno about Heeney ST, as a mid/forward he is surrounded by blokes at Sydney who are higher in the pecking order than him in terms of mid time and point scoring ability. JPK, Hanners, Parker, Jack, T Mitch, Mcveigh for example
Heeney at most could possibly hit 80 but I do not think he's worth it... Hate to say it too but second year blues as they say, may affect him
Quote from: _wato on January 02, 2016, 12:27:35 AM
Dunno about Heeney ST, as a mid/forward he is surrounded by blokes at Sydney who are higher in the pecking order than him in terms of mid time and point scoring ability. JPK, Hanners, Parker, Jack, T Mitch, Mcveigh for example
Heeney at most could possibly hit 80 but I do not think he's worth it... Hate to say it too but second year blues as they say, may affect him
discounting prices who would be your first midfield pick from the Swans ??
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 02, 2016, 12:38:35 AM
discounting prices who would be your first midfield pick from the Swans ??
Discounting prices?? That's a tough one but Kennedy > Hanners > Parker > Mitchell > Jack
Including prices would be Parker > Kennedy > Mitchell > Hannebery > Jack
J.Polec vs D.Thomas vs J.O'Meara
O'Meara > Polec = Daisy
Bennell v Dahl v Zorko put them in order.
I cant really decide on two so hopefully someone on here will help me out.
Bennell has the highest ceiling and could go around 110-120 easily and you don't want to miss out on that.
Dahl is 23 so should be heading into his prime although Libba might take a few points
Zorko scores pretty ordinary however with both of Beams and Rocky playing so he would come last for me.
Dalhouse vs Rioli vs Martin - i need two of, please
Quote from: Peter on January 02, 2016, 01:13:17 PM
Dalhouse vs Rioli vs Martin - i need two of, please
Martin is a lock so get him in.
Dahl is a safer pick who could score better than Rioli as well but Rioli only needs 10-15 disposals a game and he will be averaging 100-100.
I would pick Dahl and Martin as they are just so much safer than Cyril.
Wines/Swallow + Goldy vs Dusty + Pendles?
Quote from: Peter on January 02, 2016, 01:13:17 PM
Dalhouse vs Rioli vs Martin - i need two of, please
Martin > Dalhouse > Rioli
Quote from: Lions Man on January 02, 2016, 11:59:03 AM
Bennell v Dahl v Zorko put them in order.
Dahl...Bennell...Zorko
Quote from: Peter on January 02, 2016, 01:13:17 PM
Dalhouse vs Rioli vs Martin - i need two of, please
Martin and Dahlhaus
Quote from: GraysFan on January 02, 2016, 01:44:28 PM
Wines/Swallow + Goldy vs Dusty + Pendles?
Dusty + Pendles for me, both are premium/keepers and both are capable of being top 3 in their respective positions, whereas Wines/Swallow are not.
Shaw + Lids + Def Rookie
Vs
Bartel + Buddy + Malceski
Quote from: Gigantor on January 02, 2016, 08:04:30 PM
Shaw + Lids + Def Rookie
Vs
Bartel + Buddy + Malceski
Slightly prefer Option A
Quote from: sidvicious on January 02, 2016, 11:24:50 AM
J.Polec vs D.Thomas vs J.O'Meara
Definitely JOM if fit for Round One, maybe take a punt on Daisy if not.
Quote from: Gigantor on January 02, 2016, 08:04:30 PM
Shaw + Lids + Def Rookie
Vs
Bartel + Buddy + Malceski
If you subbed Bartel for someone else i'd prefer B.
Quote from: Gigantor on January 02, 2016, 08:04:30 PM
Shaw + Lids + Def Rookie
Vs
Bartel + Buddy + Malceski
105 + 105 + 60 + 2 keepers + cash injection
Vs
90 + 105 + 80 + 2 keepers + top 30 defender
Option A for me
Mcveigh, Swallow, Hopper v Jobe, Birchall, Rookie + $40k v Parker, Birchall, Rookie
Hard to make a call considering rookies are just a guess to anyone at this stage but we all know Hopper will play and the $123k rookies are always a little bit worse in terms of JS and scoring.. So really your input gives me security financially, in case the extra money spent on Hopper is better spent.
Wellingham vs Hibberd
Hibberd by a mile
Quote from: _wato on January 03, 2016, 01:41:53 AM
Mcveigh, Swallow, Hopper v Jobe, Birchall, Rookie + $40k v Parker, Birchall, Rookie
Hard to make a call considering rookies are just a guess to anyone at this stage but we all know Hopper will play and the $123k rookies are always a little bit worse in terms of JS and scoring.. So really your input gives me security financially, in case the extra money spent on Hopper is better spent.
TBH I don't like any of the options.
Option 1 - McVeigh is solid if he is fit, Swallow is underpriced, but I cannot see him being a Mid Keeper and is too pricy to start if he isn't going to be a keeper. Hopper I need to see more of in preseason.
Option 2 - Jobe is underpriced, Birchall is consistent but I would prefer others at his price, the rookie will depend on if one is available.
Option 3 - Parker again is underpriced, No need to say again for birchall, Rookie depends on position
I do find 3 player options hard to pick as you cannot see the structure of teams, i find it better to see the full team and make notes on it that way for anything over 2 player comparisons.
1. Mcveigh, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Swallow, Liberatore, Crouch, Mills, Hopper (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)
2. Birchall, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)
3. Birchall, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Parker, Liberatore, Crouch, Mills, Cuningham (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)
Quote from: _wato on January 04, 2016, 12:59:34 AM
1. Mcveigh, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Swallow, Liberatore, Crouch, Mills, Hopper (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)
2. Birchall, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)
3. Birchall, Bartel, Smith, Hibberd, Mackenzie, Brown (Bonner, Brown)
Ablett, Rockliff, Sloane, Parker, Liberatore, Crouch, Mills, Cuningham (Freeman, Mathieson, Petracca)
Goldstein, Naitanui (King)
Martin, Barlow, Franklin, Leuenberger, Wells, Kennedy (Kerridge, Kommer)
Option 2 for me, I much prefer the look of that midfiled.
Not sure of Birchall as D1 though.
McVeigh, Parker and someone like Trengrove would be more preference ...
Sloane v Gray v Parker + $60k
Quote from: _wato on January 04, 2016, 01:38:16 AM
Sloane v Gray v Parker + $60k
I see Gray having the highest avg with an easy draw which should make it some what easier although I don't look into them that much.
Sloane could avg 100-130 so its how much of a risk you are willing to take on that one.
Parker I think is probably a bit off Gray but he wouldn't be a bad pick either.
Gray
Sloane
Parker
for me.
It depends where the 60k goes and what you think of Gray now that he is a mid only.
Nic Nat & Wright vs Luey & Zorko (Tippett as Fwd Cover)
Quote from: _wato on January 04, 2016, 01:38:16 AM
Sloane v Gray v Parker + $60k
Sloane
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 04, 2016, 02:09:18 AM
Nic Nat & Wright vs Luey & Zorko (Tippett as Fwd Cover)
Niether really.
Kennedy v Kerridge
Is it too early to tell?
Quote from: Money Shot on January 04, 2016, 11:17:09 AM
Kennedy v Kerridge
Is it too early to tell?
Probably too early, but can you have both? Two of the better forward rookies right there.
Scott Pendlebury + A rookie worth no more than $201k (eg, Jacob Hopper) at M8
Joel Selwood/Dyson Heppell/Luke Parker + David Myers
Discuss.
Quote from: Southstorm on January 04, 2016, 12:58:11 PM
Scott Pendlebury + A rookie worth no more than $201k (eg, Jacob Hopper) at M8
Joel Selwood/Dyson Heppell/Luke Parker + David Myers
Discuss.
I like the second option as I believe Myers will make 220k/ average 85+ based on history, JS, age...vs an unknown quantity.
Sure Pendlebury looks better than the other premium considerations but last year Pendlebury had more sub 115 scores than I recall him having previously....he is a great pick don't get me wrong but doesn't do it for me like this time last year.
Jack Steven vs Dyson Heppell ??
Quote from: Pkbaldy on January 06, 2016, 08:13:20 AM
Jack Steven vs Dyson Heppell ??
Heppell easily, will be better with Jobe and Myers back, could go close to 110 I think
Steven gets way too many sub 100 scores to be worth it.. Had him all last year and while he was good for the price I got him at, for the pig statistics he pulls (120 DT every game), it doesn't translate to sc points due to poor efficiency, clambers etc
If you want consistent and good scores Hepp, if you want match winning scores every few rounds with a few 80's and 90's every second week, go Steven
Jarrad McVeigh David swallow Brett Deledio
Vs
Kade Simpson Dayne beams Toby Greene
Quote from: eaglesman on January 06, 2016, 09:07:37 PM
Jarrad McVeigh David swallow Brett Deledio
Vs
Kade Simpson Dayne beams Toby Greene
I don't think D Swallow will be a mid keeper, whereas Greene could be a fwd keeper, so option 2. I'd suggest finding a d9fferent def than Simpson for the cost though if you can!
Quote from: MC on January 06, 2016, 10:18:27 PM
Quote from: eaglesman on January 06, 2016, 09:07:37 PM
Jarrad McVeigh David swallow Brett Deledio
Vs
Kade Simpson Dayne beams Toby Greene
I don't think D Swallow will be a mid keeper, whereas Greene could be a fwd keeper, so option 2. I'd suggest finding a d9fferent def than Simpson for the cost though if you can!
I agree option 2 is the better choice, but I don't agree on changing Simpson
For arguments sake take the player either side of him pricewise.
Laird 506200
Simpson 500200
Murphy 495600
Laird - Has only had 1 year over 90, obviously has potential. Jaensch, Smith and Seedsman all being able to play that Run and Carry defender role plus not being a proven consistent scorer means he really is an unknown this year. Id only give him a 15% chance of averaging over 90.
Simpson - Has had 7 consecutive years over 90, Only missed 3 games in 10 years. Id say 80% chance he will average over 90
Murphy - 2 of last 3 years over 90. With the last 5 all over 80. Suckling coming in puts a small question mark on his role. Missed 7 games in the last 5 years. Is 33 Years of Age. Id say 50% chance of over 90, but with a few rest games.
For the price Simpson is the player with the less risk and id be willing to say he has more potential upside that both the others players, im not sure what ou want in a keeper, but Simpson is a pretty safe bet as a top 10 defender..
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 07, 2016, 02:46:09 AM
Quote from: MC on January 06, 2016, 10:18:27 PM
Quote from: eaglesman on January 06, 2016, 09:07:37 PM
Jarrad McVeigh David swallow Brett Deledio
Vs
Kade Simpson Dayne beams Toby Greene
I don't think D Swallow will be a mid keeper, whereas Greene could be a fwd keeper, so option 2. I'd suggest finding a d9fferent def than Simpson for the cost though if you can!
I agree option 2 is the better choice, but I don't agree on changing Simpson
For arguments sake take the player either side of him pricewise.
Laird 506200
Simpson 500200
Murphy 495600
Laird - Has only had 1 year over 90, obviously has potential. Jaensch, Smith and Seedsman all being able to play that Run and Carry defender role plus not being a proven consistent scorer means he really is an unknown this year. Id only give him a 15% chance of averaging over 90.
Simpson - Has had 7 consecutive years over 90, Only missed 3 games in 10 years. Id say 80% chance he will average over 90
Murphy - 2 of last 3 years over 90. With the last 5 all over 80. Suckling coming in puts a small question mark on his role. Missed 7 games in the last 5 years. Is 33 Years of Age. Id say 50% chance of over 90, but with a few rest games.
For the price Simpson is the player with the less risk and id be willing to say he has more potential upside that both the others players, im not sure what ou want in a keeper, but Simpson is a pretty safe bet as a top 10 defender..
Very good point, and I have been a massive fan of Simspon over the years. I tend to avoid SC players over 30; Simpson turns 32 at the start of this season. I feel that there is plenty of value in the def this year and it isn't necessary to choose the premium-priced players from the start. Just my opinion though!
Quote from: eaglesman on January 06, 2016, 09:07:37 PM
Jarrad McVeigh David swallow Brett Deledio
Vs
Kade Simpson Dayne beams Toby Greene
I love the first option.
McVeigh is probably only behind Shaw as the best back. Swallow screams value .. stepping stone or M8/9 end of year. Lids could be the no1 fwd this year.
vs
Simpson...old timer (McVeigh's better).... Beams is a genuine super premo (Swallow could be a stepping stone)... Greene (not for me...Lids is so much better)
Dylan Shiel vs Bennell (obviously can easily restructure team)
Quote from: Spite on January 07, 2016, 10:52:04 PM
Dylan Shiel vs Bennell (obviously can easily restructure team)
Bennell. Has more of a chance of being a top 8 forward than what Shiel has being a top 10 midfielder
Had both these players last year. Even though each could go really big, they could also go just as low. I'm sure both will be more consistent this year but of the two I'd say Bennell, if he's been able to fix his attitude problem, has more upside than Shiel. Getting away from the Gold Coast will be a plus for him. He'll be in my team as I think he is an incredibly gifted player and, really, an untapped goldmine.
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.
Tossing up whether to take both.
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46), Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.
Tossing up whether to take both.
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46), Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Both, if selected. Lyons is going to be my POD, don't think many will start him and he has shown a solid ceiling.
Quote from: Dons on January 08, 2016, 02:26:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.
Tossing up whether to take both.
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46), Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Both, if selected. Lyons is going to be my POD, don't think many will start him and he has shown a solid ceiling.
Lyons is like Jed Anderson, on the fringe of playing and not playing. Will likely need a injury or two to get a consistent run in the team. I think there is better value around that price range, but if you are looking for a POD then not a bad shout.
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 08, 2016, 03:15:17 PM
Quote from: Dons on January 08, 2016, 02:26:43 PM
Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.
Tossing up whether to take both.
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46), Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Both, if selected. Lyons is going to be my POD, don't think many will start him and he has shown a solid ceiling.
Lyons is like Jed Anderson, on the fringe of playing and not playing. Will likely need a injury or two to get a consistent run in the team. I think there is better value around that price range, but if you are looking for a POD then not a bad shout.
Yeah, he would have to get selected first, but at this early stage I think he might. I would purely be selecting him as a very high priced rookie who has shown he can score above 100. After all, it's all about getting a solid ave over 5-6 rounds, with 1 100+ score in his last 3, and he could be a very early stepping stone to a Goldy/Fyfe type, for example. Problem will be having another ripe early too, maybe a Wells/Kennedy/Myers type.
Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.
Tossing up whether to take both.
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46), Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
I was curious about these two as well. But without The NAB knowledge have taken both at this stage :)
Which player at M3?
Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k
Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham
Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?
Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k
Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham
If you select Parker then it's the same mid as me atm
Probably Selwood though tbh
Really? I'm thinking Gray and I want somebody to say why not to hahahah
Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?
Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k
Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham
Watson? Really? No justification would get me even considering him again. Well and truly past it.
Gray seems the safest pick out of the four you mentioned.
Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.
Tossing up whether to take both.
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46), Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Lyons is a proven ball winner at SANFL level and kicks goals, none of that has transitioned over to AFL yet because he hasn't been given the chance (always sub) it could go either way, the sub rule being abolished could help him or see him on the fringe, i lean towards he will get a chance.
He has recruited a sports scientist to work closely with mainly on his running efficiency & endurance.
Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?
Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k
Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham
Gray.
Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?
Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k
Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham
Gray, but I have both he and Parker ATM.
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 09, 2016, 01:43:53 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?
Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k
Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham
It's a crazy M3 imo not to have others but, Sloane of them. Selwood maybe but he's a caution, but he's the best option. Sloane set to have his best year given age and the inbred Dangerless
Watson? Really? No justification would get me even considering him again. Well and truly past it.
Gray seems the safest pick out of the four you mentioned.
Quote from: tbagrocks on January 09, 2016, 03:02:41 AM
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 09, 2016, 01:43:53 AM
Quote from: _wato on January 09, 2016, 12:48:36 AM
Which player at M3?
Gray $596k
Sloane $563k
Jelwood $566k
Parker $538k
Ablett, Rockliff, ____, Watson, Liberatore, Crouch, Myers, Cuningham
It's a crazy M3 imo not to have others but, Sloane of them. Selwood maybe but he's a caution, but he's the best option. Sloane set to have his best year given age and the inbred Dangerless
Watson? Really? No justification would get me even considering him again. Well and truly past it.
Gray seems the safest pick out of the four you mentioned.
To say it's crazy is the worst thing I have ever heard in my life. Who else is there? Potentially Pendles? Not paying $620k for somebody who may or may not improve. Will play more forward, off half back, losing mid time with Treloar and still keeping the team balanced as he can play anywhere. With that, comes the fact he will either have to kick goals or off half back get a load of cheap possies, which don't relate to SC scores. Will still have him but much cheaper. A lot of teams are running with Sloane or Jelwood at M3. Hence why I want Gray. He will outscore both easy and is only $30k more. Lol @ u tbag
Quote from: Grufflez on January 09, 2016, 02:26:04 AM
Quote from: Ringo on January 08, 2016, 02:21:16 PM
Sam Kerridge v Jarryd Lyons.
Tossing up whether to take both.
Lyons was Crows main vest candidate last year(9/13 played) but unsubbed averaged 78 (which includes a 46), Will he be the one to step up with Danger leaving?
Kerridge is some $100k cheaper but will he get opportunities with all the Blues ins.
Lyons I think has the greater upside for cash generation which is what we are seeking early. Priced at a 45 average to start.
Lyons is a proven ball winner at SANFL level and kicks goals, none of that has transitioned over to AFL yet because he hasn't been given the chance (always sub) it could go either way, the sub rule being abolished could help him or see him on the fringe, i lean towards he will get a chance.
He has recruited a sports scientist to work closely with mainly on his running efficiency & endurance.
Very interesting research, thanks for the info.
What are your thoughts on Heppell as a pod over the likes of Selwood and Sloane?
He is only going to improve with Watson and Myers supporting him and you would hope that Essedons off field troubles are behind them.
Was looking at Heppel also but read somewhere he is late to start training due to still being sore from last season. Not a huge deal but enough to put me off him.
tippett vs grundy vs sinclair for R2
Quote from: sidvicious on January 09, 2016, 01:08:37 PM
tippett vs grundy vs sinclair for R2
Not the biggest fan of any of them from a SC point of view but probably Tippett if I had to choose
Parker + Pendles
vs
Sloane + Ward/Selwood
(Sloane vs Ward vs Selwood)
Parker and Pendles by a mile
I actually prefer Sloane and Selwood, they can both go 120 where as I'm not sure if Parker is capable. Obviously a lot of people will disagree with me.
Quote from: Money Shot on January 09, 2016, 07:07:31 PM
I actually prefer Sloane and Selwood, they can both go 120 where as I'm not sure if Parker is capable. Obviously a lot of people will disagree with me.
Can't see Sloane going 120, whereas Pendles has for years.
Pendles > Jelwood
Sloane > Parker
I'd lock in Pendles and take whoever you prefer of Sloane and Parker if you can afford both, Parker if can't afford Sloaney
Quote from: Money Shot on January 09, 2016, 07:07:31 PM
I actually prefer Sloane and Selwood, they can both go 120 where as I'm not sure if Parker is capable. Obviously a lot of people will disagree with me.
Sloane and Selwood is a bit cheaper and allows me to have a bit of coin left over, however, there are more risks with that pairing. Will danger affect selwood, will selwood start slow and be a perfect upgrade target, will danger leaving affect sloane. I had sloane from the start last year with danger and was very pleased... until he copped the tag. His first three games his ave was huge and then teams payed a bit more attention to him and he ave somewhere in the 60's and I had him captain for one of those games. Just feel that the first pairing is safer with a slight bit of risk because Parker could well go huge, we saw that a couple of years ago. I love the way he plays, and with McVeigh coming of age, JPK past his prime I feel he can lift his input.
Thank you for your response!
Quote from: GoLions on January 09, 2016, 07:16:32 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 09, 2016, 07:07:31 PM
I actually prefer Sloane and Selwood, they can both go 120 where as I'm not sure if Parker is capable. Obviously a lot of people will disagree with me.
Can't see Sloane going 120, whereas Pendles has for years.
Pendles > Jelwood
Sloane > Parker
I'd lock in Pendles and take whoever you prefer of Sloane and Parker if you can afford both, Parker if can't afford Sloaney
Cheers mate. Have to make rookie adjustments to get Pendles in. He is the only one i want over 580k so parker is really my only option as the other midfielder. Do u perhaps think that Beams and Sloane is better partnership?
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 09, 2016, 07:23:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on January 09, 2016, 07:16:32 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 09, 2016, 07:07:31 PM
I actually prefer Sloane and Selwood, they can both go 120 where as I'm not sure if Parker is capable. Obviously a lot of people will disagree with me.
Can't see Sloane going 120, whereas Pendles has for years.
Pendles > Jelwood
Sloane > Parker
I'd lock in Pendles and take whoever you prefer of Sloane and Parker if you can afford both, Parker if can't afford Sloaney
Cheers mate. Have to make rookie adjustments to get Pendles in. He is the only one i want over 580k so parker is really my only option as the other midfielder. Do u perhaps think that Beams and Sloane is better partnership?
I currently have Beams myself, but I think I'd still go with Pendles and Parker
Parker Luenberger Mumford
vs
O'Meara Bennell Nic Nat
Not a fan of either but if forced would go O'Meara, Bennell and Nat.
Berger and Mumford are both injury prone. Maybe ok if you want quick cash and they play the first 5/6 rounds but a very big risk,
O'Meara may not be playing Round 1 as Suns have said they will be managing his return, Bennell at a new club but has a fair bit of baggage.
I would be more happy with Parker, Bennell and Nat if you can afford. Berger to replace Bennell if cash strapped.
:-\
Zorko and Litherland and $14,000
V
Bird and Duryea and $36,300
Tough one again here.
Think Zorko may get less mid time this year unless Brisbane are again racked by injuries. May score more goals to compensate though.
Litlherland is he in Hawks best 22. Only 6 games for them last year.
Bird - new club and coach has siad he will be given midfield time so this should up his points scoring as coaches do not lie do they.
Duryea - Came of age during the finals series averaging 88 for last 6 games unsubbed (97 in GF and 113 in Prelim). Question though is can he keep it up. At 24 should be able to and coming into prime as a defender,
So based on the analysis Bird and Duryea (Hope you are not copying my team as I currently have both) but a slight risk involved which could pay off big time.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 11, 2016, 05:58:32 AM
:-\
Zorko and Litherland and $14,000
V
Bird and Duryea and $36,300
None of the above. Look elsewhere.
McVeigh, Pendles and S Martin v Simpson, J Selwood/Sloane and Goldstein
Provided that all of the above players play some of the NAB Challenge, are injury free and are named round 1 which combo is better?
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 11, 2016, 11:19:45 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 11, 2016, 05:58:32 AM
:-\
Zorko and Litherland and $14,000
V
Bird and Duryea and $36,300
None of the above. Look elsewhere.
Sorry for not being able to remember completely, but sure I read that Hawthorn were expecting Litherland to take over
Matt Sucling's position. So another NAB watch.. have had Bird in and out Ringo, but Duryea from your information !! Thanks.
4 out of 8 the same
Martin, Barlow, Bird, Leuenberger, J Lyons, C Ellis, C Pettracca P Ahern
Leuenberger vs D.Wells
Quote from: sidvicious on January 11, 2016, 07:11:58 PM
Leuenberger vs D.Wells
Whoever is still able to run come Round 1
Laird v Simpson
S. Martin + Nic Nat vs. Goldstein + Lobbe
Quote from: BomberSam on January 12, 2016, 12:29:51 PM
S. Martin + Nic Nat vs. Goldstein + Lobbe
Goldy and Lobbe take the cake now that Ryder is gone I think. Though in saying that, he is still a bit of a plodder...
Nic Nat, Wines and Franklin
vs
Lobbe, Gray, Dahlhaus
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 12, 2016, 09:04:59 PM
Nic Nat, Wines and Franklin
vs
Lobbe, Gray, Dahlhaus
Can you do Nic Nat, Gray and Dahlhaus?
Otherwise option 1 but not by much.
I see Nic Nat around 105, Wines 105, Buddy 95
v
Lobbe 90, Gray 110 and Dahl 100
Quote from: AaronKirk on January 12, 2016, 09:22:42 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 12, 2016, 09:04:59 PM
Nic Nat, Wines and Franklin
vs
Lobbe, Gray, Dahlhaus
Can you do Nic Nat, Gray and Dahlhaus?
Otherwise option 1 but not by much.
I see Nic Nat around 105, Wines 105, Buddy 95
v
Lobbe 90, Gray 110 and Dahl 100
The funds from downgrading Nic Nat to Lobbe are being used to upgrade those guys. If I downgraded my rookies a bit to the basement priced essendon ones then would you go Wines to Gray/Sloane or Buddy to Zorko/Bennel/Dahlhaus? Thanks for the reply, would love your thoughts on my team as well. Cheers.
Parker vs. Shiel vs. Wines?
Quote from: BomberSam on January 16, 2016, 05:25:40 PM
Parker vs. Shiel vs. Wines?
Wow thats tough
Parker for me, less risk
Shiel if you want a real POD
Pendles, Goldy, Shaw + Def Rookie
vs
4 lesser premos (Eg, Sloane, SMartin, KK, Hurn)
Thanks guys, but is Parker actually less risk? Is he going to play a pure mid role? The rise of T-Mitch has me wondering.
Quote from: Gigantor on January 16, 2016, 05:31:13 PM
Pendles, Goldy, Shaw + Def Rookie
vs
4 lesser premos (Eg, Sloane, SMartin, KK, Hurn)
Pendles is underpriced, likely to be back to his 120+ best.
I am of the opinion Goldy will be hard to achieve if you don't start with him, lock him in if you can.
I feel there is much better value than Shaw, and he will be available significantly cheaper at some point.
So Pendles, Goldy and perhaps a couple of value defenders? Could you afford Smith and Yeo?
Quote from: BomberSam on January 16, 2016, 05:37:11 PM
Thanks guys, but is Parker actually less risk? Is he going to play a pure mid role? The rise of T-Mitch has me wondering.
I think Shiel could go massive but will probably be the first GWS player to attract a tag
Yes Parker could spend more time forward but he his good enough to kick 25+ if he does.
Wines is a very close second to Parker but I'm wary of Port players as I think they are a bit of an unknown this year
Quote from: BomberSam on January 16, 2016, 05:40:25 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 16, 2016, 05:31:13 PM
Pendles, Goldy, Shaw + Def Rookie
vs
4 lesser premos (Eg, Sloane, SMartin, KK, Hurn)
Pendles is underpriced, likely to be back to his 120+ best.
I am of the opinion Goldy will be hard to achieve if you don't start with him, lock him in if you can.
I feel there is much better value than Shaw, and he will be available significantly cheaper at some point.
So Pendles, Goldy and perhaps a couple of value defenders? Could you afford Smith and Yeo?
Yeo and Smith are currently D2 and D3 haha
If a lot of quality cheap rookies appear rd 1 I will be able to go Pendles, Goldy + 2 cheaper def premos but for now I think I'll stick with Pendles, Goldy, Shaw and Rookie.
Shaw + Sloane + Zerrett + 190-200k M(7) rookie
V
McVeigh + Pendlebury + Bennell + 123k M(7) rookie
The research I've done is that option 1 is safer as they're worst will be better than option 2 but option 2 has a higher ceiling.
Thinking Pendles + Bennell could go same as Sloane + Zerrett so then it's Shaw v McVeigh where shaw is an easy win.
But I'm not too sure...?
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 17, 2016, 01:30:38 PM
Shaw + Sloane + Zerrett + 190-200k M(7) rookie
V
McVeigh + Pendlebury + Bennell + 123k M(7) rookie
The research I've done is that option 1 is safer as they're worst will be better than option 2 but option 2 has a higher ceiling.
Thinking Pendles + Bennell could go same as Sloane + Zerrett so then it's Shaw v McVeigh where shaw is an easy win.
But I'm not too sure...?
I think pendles and bennell would outscore sloane and zerrett comfortably myself mate.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 17, 2016, 01:30:38 PM
Shaw + Sloane + Zerrett + 190-200k M(7) rookie
V
McVeigh + Pendlebury + Bennell + 123k M(7) rookie
The research I've done is that option 1 is safer as they're worst will be better than option 2 but option 2 has a higher ceiling.
Thinking Pendles + Bennell could go same as Sloane + Zerrett so then it's Shaw v McVeigh where shaw is an easy win.
But I'm not too sure...?
I would go Pendles + Bennell over Sloane + Zerrett every day of the week man. And Shaw vs McVeigh there isn't much in it imo (i reckon Shaw comes back down to 105ish next year, maybe even lower)
So bottom one for me
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 17, 2016, 01:30:38 PM
Shaw + Sloane + Zerrett + 190-200k M(7) rookie
V
McVeigh + Pendlebury + Bennell + 123k M(7) rookie
The research I've done is that option 1 is safer as they're worst will be better than option 2 but option 2 has a higher ceiling.
Thinking Pendles + Bennell could go same as Sloane + Zerrett so then it's Shaw v McVeigh where shaw is an easy win.
But I'm not too sure...?
Definitely McVeigh, Pendles and Bennell. Watch Bennell pre-season though. He could average 110-115 if he could stay on the park, but that sciatica could be a problem. You will get Shaw cheaper, perfect upgrade target.
Simpson V KK ?
Quote from: quinny88 on January 18, 2016, 12:22:46 AM
Simpson V KK ?
Simpson for me, plenty of runs on the board
Who knows how GAJ, Swallow, JOM and Prestia all playing together will affect KKs scoring. Plus Eski could get his shower together this year as well
Quote from: Gigantor on January 18, 2016, 12:35:27 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 18, 2016, 12:22:46 AM
Simpson V KK ?
Simpson for me, plenty of runs on the board
Who knows how GAJ, Swallow, JOM and Prestia all playing together will affect KKs scoring. Plus Eski could get his shower together this year as well
Yeah I tend to agree gig but seen KK in a lot more teams than simmo strangely
Houli, Nic Nat, Bird
Vs
Yeo, SMartin, Buddy
and Buddy vs Zerrett. Cheers ;D ;D
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 19, 2016, 12:17:38 AM
Houli, Nic Nat, Bird
Vs
Yeo, SMartin, Buddy
and Buddy vs Zerrett. Cheers ;D ;D
Yeo, S Martin, Zerrett
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 19, 2016, 12:21:37 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 19, 2016, 12:17:38 AM
Houli, Nic Nat, Bird
Vs
Yeo, SMartin, Buddy
and Buddy vs Zerrett. Cheers ;D ;D
Yeo, S Martin, Zerrett
Sorry mate I actually meant:
Houli, SMartin, Bird
Vs
Yeo, Nic Nat, Buddy/Zerrett.
Still think Option 2?
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 19, 2016, 12:38:21 AM
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 19, 2016, 12:21:37 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 19, 2016, 12:17:38 AM
Houli, Nic Nat, Bird
Vs
Yeo, SMartin, Buddy
and Buddy vs Zerrett. Cheers ;D ;D
Yeo, S Martin, Zerrett
Sorry mate I actually meant:
Houli, SMartin, Bird
Vs
Yeo, Nic Nat, Buddy/Zerrett.
Still think Option 2?
Yeah I still like option 2 with Zerrett over Buddy.
Quote from: Gigantor on January 18, 2016, 12:35:27 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 18, 2016, 12:22:46 AM
Simpson V KK ?
Simpson for me, plenty of runs on the board
Who knows how GAJ, Swallow, JOM and Prestia all playing together will affect KKs scoring. Plus Eski could get his shower together this year as well
I'm torn on this one. The appeal for KK would be natural improvement, soft opening draw and JOM not being quite ready early
Quote from: Spite on January 19, 2016, 01:06:26 AM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 18, 2016, 12:35:27 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 18, 2016, 12:22:46 AM
Simpson V KK ?
Simpson for me, plenty of runs on the board
Who knows how GAJ, Swallow, JOM and Prestia all playing together will affect KKs scoring. Plus Eski could get his shower together this year as well
I'm torn on this one. The appeal for KK would be natural improvement, soft opening draw and JOM not being quite ready early
hard one but like many get burned by Simpson with his low scores last season so wary. KK has a huge upside but as has been stated what will his role be with the return of stars and will Eski step up this year with second year at the club.
Probably favour KK initially with Suns draw.
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 19, 2016, 12:43:43 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 19, 2016, 12:38:21 AM
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 19, 2016, 12:21:37 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 19, 2016, 12:17:38 AM
Houli, Nic Nat, Bird
Vs
Yeo, SMartin, Buddy
and Buddy vs Zerrett. Cheers ;D ;D
Yeo, S Martin, Zerrett
Sorry mate I actually meant:
Houli, SMartin, Bird
Vs
Yeo, Nic Nat, Buddy/Zerrett.
Still think Option 2?
Yeah I still like option 2 with Zerrett over Buddy.
Option 2 for me as well. make decision on Buddy v Merrett after watching both in the preseason cup.
Considering Duggan (WCE) or Anderson (NTH) for a possible F5 spot.
Both capable of good footy but not sure on eithers job security at this stage. Any WC or NTH fans have any insight?
If both had decent JS which way would you go?
Cheers.
Quote from: PiPies on January 21, 2016, 06:34:11 PM
Considering Duggan (WCE) or Anderson (NTH) for a possible F5 spot.
Both capable of good footy but not sure on eithers job security at this stage. Any WC or NTH fans have any insight?
If both had decent JS which way would you go?
Cheers.
Simpkin over both :D
Quote from: MC on January 21, 2016, 10:34:21 PM
Quote from: PiPies on January 21, 2016, 06:34:11 PM
Considering Duggan (WCE) or Anderson (NTH) for a possible F5 spot.
Both capable of good footy but not sure on eithers job security at this stage. Any WC or NTH fans have any insight?
If both had decent JS which way would you go?
Cheers.
Simpkin over both :D
Duggan/Simpkin
from articles i read Duggan cemented his spot in the eagles 22 before he was injured. He's in my non updated team atm.
Interesting to see whether Simpkin can get ball himself without it getting handed to him at AFL level like the hawks did. Id definitely tred with caution with him.
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 01:01:26 AM
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Gray is locked away for me. Easy run and I don't think he scored under 80 (minus the Carlton Game) last year. Also had a remarkable number of 120-130+ games. Could easily push 120 but I think 112-115 is almost guaranteed. As for the other two, Sloane burnt me when I brought him in for Gaj last year with two 60's (one as captain) and then when I brought him in for the last round for fyfe with a low 70. I don't think he will handle the tag that well and will be impacted by Danger's departure. Pendles is mr consistent and is always a safe starter every year.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 01:01:26 AM
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Let's be honest here, the real question should be:
"I've locked in Pendles, so please help me to pick from Sloane/Gray as my 2nd choice..."
Picking Pendles should require no convincing, he's been a top choice for ever and even in his worst season for a long time still managed to be the highest-scoring mid in the comp. What else do you want/need?
His last 5 seasons:
2011 - 22/129
2012 - 18/125
2013 - 22/127
2014 - 21/124
2015 - 22/116
So his 'level' is around the 125 mark... no great leap of faith to suggest that he's likely to hit it again...
Anyway, back to the question...
Sloane vs Gray
I suggest Gray, merely because of the consistency and predictability. Sloane is a relative unknown in the absence of Danger (as is Adelaide), whereas Port I feel will only get stronger in 2016 - I predict a top 4 finish.
To be fair I feel like Sloane has a higher ceiling, though Gray will be a safer choice to finish the season as a top 10 mid.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 01:01:26 AM
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Pendles way ahead of both.
Gray ahead of Sloane due to uncertainty with Danger gone.
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 22, 2016, 07:08:21 AM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 01:01:26 AM
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Pendles way ahead of both.
Gray ahead of Sloane due to uncertainty with Danger gone.
+ Adelaide's draw
Rance v Bartel
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2016, 11:59:08 AM
Rance v Bartel
Bartel
He's underpriced and Rance has just come off his best ever year
Quote from: MC on January 22, 2016, 04:04:21 AM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 01:01:26 AM
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Let's be honest here, the real question should be:
"I've locked in Pendles, so please help me to pick from Sloane/Gray as my 2nd choice..."
Picking Pendles should require no convincing, he's been a top choice for ever and even in his worst season for a long time still managed to be the highest-scoring mid in the comp. What else do you want/need?
His last 5 seasons:
2011 - 22/129
2012 - 18/125
2013 - 22/127
2014 - 21/124
2015 - 22/116
So his 'level' is around the 125 mark... no great leap of faith to suggest that he's likely to hit it again...
Anyway, back to the question...
Sloane vs Gray
I suggest Gray, merely because of the consistency and predictability. Sloane is a relative unknown in the absence of Danger (as is Adelaide), whereas Port I feel will only get stronger in 2016 - I predict a top 4 finish.
To be fair I feel like Sloane has a higher ceiling, though Gray will be a safer choice to finish the season as a top 10 mid.
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 22, 2016, 07:08:21 AM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 01:01:26 AM
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Pendles way ahead of both.
Gray ahead of Sloane due to uncertainty with Danger gone.
I looked into this article http://www.jockreynolds.com.au/2013/01/09/the-collingwood-conundrum-mick-the-mad-irishman/
Definitely think he's a lock now as Treloar will help his scoring. Don't know what I was thinking before.
Cheers guys!
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2016, 11:59:08 AM
Rance v Bartel
Bartel by a country mile.
Cheapers
Proven 100+scorer.
Bartel's worst year is higher than Rance's career average. You take out partel's 5 and he averages 95.8 last year
Quote from: Ricochet on January 22, 2016, 12:01:39 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2016, 11:59:08 AM
Rance v Bartel
Bartel
He's underpriced and Rance has just come off his best ever year
Quote from: LordSneeze on January 22, 2016, 12:58:27 PM
Quote from: enzedder on January 22, 2016, 11:59:08 AM
Rance v Bartel
Bartel by a country mile.
Cheapers
Proven 100+scorer.
Bartel's worst year is higher than Rance's career average. You take out partel's 5 and he averages 95.8 last year
Yeah... I've been planning with Bartel in mind... Just mindful he'll be 33 this year and think Rance will back up. DPP Bartel and cheaper too...gives him the edge... 50-60 k will come in handy no doubt.
Thanks :)
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 12:55:41 PM
Quote from: MC on January 22, 2016, 04:04:21 AM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 01:01:26 AM
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Let's be honest here, the real question should be:
"I've locked in Pendles, so please help me to pick from Sloane/Gray as my 2nd choice..."
Picking Pendles should require no convincing, he's been a top choice for ever and even in his worst season for a long time still managed to be the highest-scoring mid in the comp. What else do you want/need?
His last 5 seasons:
2011 - 22/129
2012 - 18/125
2013 - 22/127
2014 - 21/124
2015 - 22/116
So his 'level' is around the 125 mark... no great leap of faith to suggest that he's likely to hit it again...
Anyway, back to the question...
Sloane vs Gray
I suggest Gray, merely because of the consistency and predictability. Sloane is a relative unknown in the absence of Danger (as is Adelaide), whereas Port I feel will only get stronger in 2016 - I predict a top 4 finish.
To be fair I feel like Sloane has a higher ceiling, though Gray will be a safer choice to finish the season as a top 10 mid.
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 22, 2016, 07:08:21 AM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 01:01:26 AM
2 of:
Pendlebury + Gray + Sloane
i think they could all go 120, sloane the most likely to dip lowest in price... but the way he started and ended the year (before and after injuries) really make it hard not to want him >:(
Pendles way ahead of both.
Gray ahead of Sloane due to uncertainty with Danger gone.
I looked into this article http://www.jockreynolds.com.au/2013/01/09/the-collingwood-conundrum-mick-the-mad-irishman/
Definitely think he's a lock now as Treloar will help his scoring. Don't know what I was thinking before.
Cheers guys!
That article is 3 years old and goes on to say how when one of the big three missed out, the others performed better. So Treloar coming in should decrease his scoring - according to that article.
Honestly guys I am scared of starting pendles and I'm a pies supporter. Adams should get bulk mid time, more so than Pendles just because he sucks at any other position. Add in Treloar, Sidey will probably get shifted about and I think so will Pendles...and then there's Greenwood too.
Personally I think he's priced at what he will average. Will be a top SC scorer this year but won't be 120+ like a few of you are expecting and I don't think he's under-priced. Pies need to win more games for players to score more points as a whole (there's a correlation) and I just don't see us winning more than 1-2 games more than last year.
He averaged 127 when both beams and swan played with him and less 116 when only swan or beams played with him which the article says. Proves he scores better with a better midfield around him as it takes the pressure off.
He will score much better this year and is certainly under priced... He averaged 124 the previous year when the same thing happened to us but he had beams + swan + sidebottom at basically their peaks apart from swan.
i can also see us winning much more games as there were a few close ones this year which we lost on the back of poor decision making which a year more experience will help.
Correlation of more wins more points is less relevant to pendles as he averaged 123:111 W:L from memory. Even if pies did win 4 more games this year, his estimated average only increases by another 2.4 points to 118.6 which still doesnt account for the other 6 points he lost on when he had a host gun mids around him.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 22, 2016, 05:37:11 PM
He averaged 127 when both beams and swan played with him and less 116 when only swan or beams played with him which the article says. Proves he scores better with a better midfield around him as it takes the pressure off.
He will score much better this year and is certainly under priced... He averaged 124 the previous year when the same thing happened to us but he had beams + swan + sidebottom at basically their peaks apart from swan.
i can also see us winning much more games as there were a few close ones this year which we lost on the back of poor decision making which a year more experience will help.
Correlation of more wins more points is less relevant to pendles as he averaged 123:111 W:L from memory. Even if pies did win 4 more games this year, his estimated average only increases by another 2.4 points to 118.6 which still doesnt account for the other 6 points he lost on when he had a host gun mids around him.
The tables didn't load on my phone but once I got on the comp I saw which table you're talking about. I guess the biggest difference is that back then, Pendles didn't play up forward or down back and now he can play both pretty well so he's not 100% to play pure mid like seasons past (my opinion - if you don't agree, then I can 100% see why you'd pick him).
You're a very optimistic pies supporter if you think we will win 4 more games this year than last, love it! How did you work out the 2.4 increase from 4 games? Thanks!
Cripps vs Adams?
Quote from: Perts24 on January 23, 2016, 08:21:47 PM
Cripps vs Adams?
Adams for sure, his role is more clearly defined.
Quote from: Perts24 on January 23, 2016, 08:21:47 PM
Cripps vs Adams?
Neither, downgrade elsewhere so you can get a proper premium.
Brodie Smith v Jimmy Bartel?
Quote from: quinny88 on January 25, 2016, 12:50:08 AM
Brodie Smith v Jimmy Bartel?
Bartel has proven time and time again that he can score enough for a premium defender. Smith has only done it once.
So Bartel easily for me.
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 25, 2016, 01:04:44 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 25, 2016, 12:50:08 AM
Brodie Smith v Jimmy Bartel?
Bartel has proven time and time again that he can score enough for a premium defender. Smith has only done it once.
So Bartel easily for me.
I tend to agree but do age and the fact that he won't play midfield hurt him?
Quote from: quinny88 on January 25, 2016, 01:08:39 AM
Quote from: ben_020285 on January 25, 2016, 01:04:44 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on January 25, 2016, 12:50:08 AM
Brodie Smith v Jimmy Bartel?
Bartel has proven time and time again that he can score enough for a premium defender. Smith has only done it once.
So Bartel easily for me.
I tend to agree but do age and the fact that he won't play midfield hurt him?
I think they are both slight causes for concern. I'm not expecting him to average 120 like he has previously but I don't think a 100 average is out of the question even at his age and without time in the midfield.
JPK vs Gray
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on January 25, 2016, 09:33:35 AM
JPK vs Gray
JPK is more reliable in terms of averaging 105 and playing every game, but Gray is more fun to watch!
Gray is also discounted by 3 due to his injury game, and has more potential to average 115 (given Port's likely rise and a greater ability to score 130+).
James Aish vs Ryan Harwood
Also which two out of T.Greene Z.Merrett S.Motlop or Buddy
Quote from: sidvicious on January 25, 2016, 12:37:34 PM
James Aish vs Ryan Harwood
Also which two out of T.Greene Z.Merrett S.Motlop or Buddy
Aish wasn't best 22 at brisbane so I don't see him walking straight into the pies 22 tbh. Harwood probably a better scorer anyway if fit.
Buddy definitely best option of those forwards, maybe Greene second?
Quote from: GoLions on January 25, 2016, 12:40:42 PM
Quote from: sidvicious on January 25, 2016, 12:37:34 PM
James Aish vs Ryan Harwood
Also which two out of T.Greene Z.Merrett S.Motlop or Buddy
Aish wasn't best 22 at brisbane so I don't see him walking straight into the pies 22 tbh. Harwood probably a better scorer anyway if fit.
Buddy definitely best option of those forwards, maybe Greene second?
Was it form or injury that kept Harwood out last season only playing 3 games?
Quote from: frenzy on January 25, 2016, 07:16:20 PM
Quote from: GoLions on January 25, 2016, 12:40:42 PM
Quote from: sidvicious on January 25, 2016, 12:37:34 PM
James Aish vs Ryan Harwood
Also which two out of T.Greene Z.Merrett S.Motlop or Buddy
Aish wasn't best 22 at brisbane so I don't see him walking straight into the pies 22 tbh. Harwood probably a better scorer anyway if fit.
Buddy definitely best option of those forwards, maybe Greene second?
Was it form or injury that kept Harwood out last season only playing 3 games?
Mostly injury (and subsequently match fitness)
Gunston v Roughy
Gunston
Quote from: _wato on January 26, 2016, 03:00:58 PM
Gunston v Roughy
neither, but gunston if it has to be 1
Quote from: sidvicious on January 25, 2016, 12:37:34 PM
James Aish vs Ryan Harwood
Also which two out of T.Greene Z.Merrett S.Motlop or Buddy
Aish for me, he basically declined to play for brisbane from what i heard. Might put in some effort at the pies.
and probably any of them but motlop... choose on byes + cash because theyll all go around the same!
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on January 25, 2016, 09:33:35 AM
JPK vs Gray
im going gray, new interchange cap will grant him extra time up forward! Could really hit the scoreboard!
Neither? Joking?
They're both great, but only one is a GUN
Quote from: _wato on January 26, 2016, 07:18:15 PM
Neither? Joking?
Roughead out of the two
but would prefer Josh j for constancy from a Kpf.
Quote from: _wato on January 26, 2016, 03:00:58 PM
Gunston v Roughy
With the new interchange cap I could see Rough rucking the forward half, adding some points possibly?
Both are safe for 90 i'd say, though there's more value elsewhere
Fyfe + KK
vs
Gray + McVeigh
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 27, 2016, 12:17:25 AM
Fyfe + KK
vs
Gray + McVeigh
Tough one because Fyfe is still in the rehab group and McVeigh has had post season surgery himself with no word about how he is travelling so he's making me nervous as all my planning has involved him. I'd say Gray + McVeigh atm.
Mine...
Shaw + Gray vs McVeigh (if fit) + Beams
http://www.lions.com.au/news/2016-01-25/beams-confident-to-lead
From this article enzedder
"He said an injury to his shoulder that required surgery and ended his 2015 season had been progressing slowly but he was on track.
“The strength and stuff is pretty good in it. It’s just more feeling confident within it to get back out there with the boys. We’ve taken the cautious approach towards it .
“I’m not too sure about NAB Cup at this stage but all things are tracking towards me being right to play round one which is the main thing, I guess.â€
So with Beams we may have another player going into round 1 without a preseason game. So you may be forced to go Shaw + Gray.
Quote from: Ringo on January 27, 2016, 11:27:46 AM
http://www.lions.com.au/news/2016-01-25/beams-confident-to-lead
From this article enzedder
"He said an injury to his shoulder that required surgery and ended his 2015 season had been progressing slowly but he was on track.
“The strength and stuff is pretty good in it. It’s just more feeling confident within it to get back out there with the boys. We’ve taken the cautious approach towards it .
“I’m not too sure about NAB Cup at this stage but all things are tracking towards me being right to play round one which is the main thing, I guess.â€
So with Beams we may have another player going into round 1 without a preseason game. So you may be forced to go Shaw + Gray.
Thanks Ringo. As much as I would love to start Beams perhaps it would be better to go the two you say...2 fit types v 2 questionables.
Looking at some backline combinations at the moment:
Laird & Malceski
or
KK & Smith
Thinking there's a lot of potential in this bunch!
Quote from: jfitty on January 28, 2016, 03:02:26 PM
Looking at some backline combinations at the moment:
Laird & Malceski
or
KK & Smith
Thinking there's a lot of potential in this bunch!
KK & Smith for me as I like both the picks.
I also like the Laird pick but not the Malceski pick as I don't think he will average enough to be a keeper.
::)
J Lyons (Adel) v D Wells (Nth). Can afford either and currently going with Lyons with total uncertainty.
Was muted by the Herald/Sun to benefit by Danger's departure and gain more mid time. Yet doesn't appear
in the Sun's version of the Crowes best 22.
And Wells in his "last" season. Don't envisage either becoming a keeper, unless I suffer injuries like this last
season. So it comes down to who will score best, accumulate cash quickest, and give the best over all result
until trade time. The biggest call-cry ATM is watch in the NAB, but unfortunately a lot of these questions
won't be answered then, due to the total unimportance of it. Thanks in advance and cheers to all. :-\
KK and Smith from above.. Don't believe that Laird's role will be as SC friendly this year, and Melceski would have to really show something in the " It doesn't matter Cup "
Looking at back options
shaw + aish vs bartel + Rosa
I really think shaw will be top 2 and aish
Has potential so leaning towards option 1
Quote from: Corkascrew on January 28, 2016, 03:43:33 PM
Looking at back options
shaw + aish vs bartel + Rosa
I really think shaw will be top 2 and aish
Has potential so leaning towards option 1
I'd lean towards option 1 for same reasons mate.
Quote from: jfitty on January 28, 2016, 03:02:26 PM
Looking at some backline combinations at the moment:
Laird & Malceski
or
KK & Smith
Thinking there's a lot of potential in this bunch!
I've considered KK off and on and at end of last year thought I'd have him for sure... Only reason I don't now is because I have Bartel, Yeo and Smith but if any of those 3 go down he'll be my go to.
I haven't considered Malsexy or Laird at all. Easy one for me.
@ Sabre... See how Nab goes but Wells all day atm.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 28, 2016, 03:09:14 PM
::)
J Lyons (Adel) v D Wells (Nth). Can afford either and currently going with Lyons with total uncertainty.
Was muted by the Herald/Sun to benefit by Danger's departure and gain more mid time. Yet doesn't appear
in the Sun's version of the Crowes best 22.
And Wells in his "last" season. Don't envisage either becoming a keeper, unless I suffer injuries like this last
season. So it comes down to who will score best, accumulate cash quickest, and give the best over all result
until trade time. The biggest call-cry ATM is watch in the NAB, but unfortunately a lot of these questions
won't be answered then, due to the total unimportance of it. Thanks in advance and cheers to all. :-\
KK and Smith from above.. Don't believe that Laird's role will be as SC friendly this year, and Melceski would have to really show something in the " It doesn't matter Cup "
If Lyons plays, pick him over Wells every day of the week without the vest.
Quote from: enzedder on January 28, 2016, 03:54:04 PM
Quote from: Corkascrew on January 28, 2016, 03:43:33 PM
Looking at back options
shaw + aish vs bartel + Rosa
I really think shaw will be top 2 and aish
Has potential so leaning towards option 1
I'd lean towards option 1 for same reasons mate.
Quote from: jfitty on January 28, 2016, 03:02:26 PM
Looking at some backline combinations at the moment:
Laird & Malceski
or
KK & Smith
Thinking there's a lot of potential in this bunch!
I've considered KK off and on and at end of last year thought I'd have him for sure... Only reason I don't now is because I have Bartel, Yeo and Smith but if any of those 3 go down he'll be my go to.
I haven't considered Malsexy or Laird at all. Easy one for me.
KK has been in and out of my side too. Still not sure with GC mids to come back in.
But i still think KK & Smith over Laird & Malceski.
I have to decide on Yeo or Smith
Buddy + Leuy
Vs
Crouch + Tippett
Vs
Crouch + Sinclair + 65k
Had Buddy and Leuy for ages but am now worried about potential missing games, leaning towards option 3 pending Sinclair's performance in NAB
Actually prefer B Gigantor - I think Tippett is more a potential keeper at F6/7 to provide Ruck coverage. Think he will score better than Sinclair if you want to save a trade.
One for discussion
Daniel Wells v Jarryd Lyons.
Wells injury prone but huge upside if he can get 6/7 games in.
Lyons will he be one to benefit from Dangers departure or will he slide down with Crouchs return.
Hard tasked trying to pick between liberatore vs b.crouch what do you guys think?
Quote from: Seamon8er on January 29, 2016, 02:22:24 PM
Hard tasked trying to pick between liberatore vs b.crouch what do you guys think?
Libba but why not both?
Quote from: Spite on January 29, 2016, 02:24:20 PM
Quote from: Seamon8er on January 29, 2016, 02:22:24 PM
Hard tasked trying to pick between liberatore vs b.crouch what do you guys think?
Libba but why not both?
While Crouch is great value, I've been considering not starting him for a while now...just a gut feeling I guess
Parker or Titch (if you had to choose one)
Quote from: Spite on January 29, 2016, 02:24:20 PM
Quote from: Seamon8er on January 29, 2016, 02:22:24 PM
Hard tasked trying to pick between liberatore vs b.crouch what do you guys think?
Libba but why not both?
Yea the temptation is there for both just going to struggle with the cash or picking someone to downgrade haha
Quote from: Spite on January 29, 2016, 02:34:01 PM
Parker or Titch (if you had to choose one)
Personally would go Parker but more a guy feel than anything else
Quote from: Ringo on January 29, 2016, 11:25:21 AM
One for discussion
Daniel Wells v Jarryd Lyons.
Wells injury prone but huge upside if he can get 6/7 games in.
Lyons will he be one to benefit from Dangers departure or will he slide down with Crouchs return.
I don't think you can really make a decision until NAB,
If Wells looks solid then I think he is a lock even if Lyons plays a lot in the midfield
Lobbe + Lachie Hunter (WB) or
Goldstein + 123k Rookie
Quote from: fanTCfool on January 29, 2016, 05:33:56 PM
Lobbe + Lachie Hunter (WB) or
Goldstein + 123k Rookie
GOATstein locked and loaded
:)
To get the team depth I want I need to downgrade one of R Gray or Dahlhaus. I think with the draw and the uncertainty of the affect of Libba's return to the kennel that Gray is the one to keep. But if I were sure I wouldn't be asking. Your thoughts please.
Also WCE fans. L Duggan is currently my M.8 what do you think of this ?? I have a hunch about him this year, could I be on the right track ?? Cheers and thanks to anybody that has a say. :)
Current midfield :- S Pendlebury, G Ablett, R Gray, T Rockliff, T Liberatore, B Crouch, D Wells, L Duggan
EM. J Hopper, J Gresham, S Kerridge
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 30, 2016, 05:22:05 AM
:)
To get the team depth I want I need to downgrade one of R Gray or Dahlhaus. I think with the draw and the uncertainty of the affect of Libba's return to the kennel that Gray is the one to keep. But if I were sure I wouldn't be asking. Your thoughts please.
Also WCE fans. L Duggan is currently my M.8 what do you think of this ?? I have a hunch about him this year, could I be on the right track ?? Cheers and thanks to anybody that has a say. :)
Current midfield :- S Pendlebury, G Ablett, R Gray, T Rockliff, T Liberatore, B Crouch, D Wells, L Duggan
EM. J Hopper, J Gresham, S Kerridge
I'd say Gray will definitely average more so it depends on if you really need the extra 30k.
Interested to hear peoples thoughts on McVeigh vs Bartel. Both are old but both are consistent scorers. Is McVeigh worth the extra 70k?
Quote from: DaveElNacho on January 30, 2016, 12:36:26 PM
Interested to hear peoples thoughts on McVeigh vs Bartel. Both are old but both are consistent scorers. Is McVeigh worth the extra 70k?
Has to be Bartel
McVeigh's preseason has been near non existent. He's an upgrade target for me
Rance ($523,700) Vs K.Simpson ($500,200)
Am really torn.
Francis, Weitering, Oliver, Mills, Parish, Wells, Simpkin
Or
KK, Bartel, 5 117k rookies
Cripps vs Wines vs Bont
Wines - look at my thread if you want my reasoning :) :)
Franklin v Bennell v Gunston v z Merrett.
1-4 ? Thoughts
Quote from: The_Captain on January 30, 2016, 06:56:17 PM
Franklin v Bennell v Gunston v z Merrett.
1-4 ? Thoughts
Buddy, GUNston, Bennell, Merrett
Francis, Weitering, Oliver, Mills, Parish, Wells, Simpkin
Or
KK, Bartel, 5 117k rookies
Quote from: TexR74 on January 30, 2016, 04:23:08 PM
Cripps vs Wines vs Bont
I'd take Wines here
Quote from: Money Shot on January 30, 2016, 07:07:31 PM
Francis, Weitering, Oliver, Mills, Parish, Wells, Simpkin
Or
KK, Bartel, 5 117k rookies
The latter, 7 rookie/rookie priced is too much of a risk for my liking
Quote from: GoLions on January 30, 2016, 07:02:42 PM
Quote from: The_Captain on January 30, 2016, 06:56:17 PM
Franklin v Bennell v Gunston v z Merrett.
1-4 ? Thoughts
Buddy, GUNston, Bennell, Merrett
Same order as GL
Quote from: Money Shot on January 30, 2016, 07:07:31 PM
Francis, Weitering, Oliver, Mills, Parish, Wells, Simpkin
Or
KK, Bartel, 5 117k rookies
Depends who those rookies would be. Bartel is a massive lock for me though. Can you change Weitering to Bartel if you drop Oliver and Mills to 117k rookies?
JPK v Gray v Priddis
Quote from: Ringo on January 30, 2016, 07:18:08 PM
JPK v Gray v Priddis
I'm a big fan of JPK for this year especially, finishing off last year with such good form.
With Priddis, you know what you're going to get, but probably won't get anything more, and Gray, hmmm, yes as a DPP but not as a Mid Only for mine.
Quote from: Ringo on January 30, 2016, 07:18:08 PM
JPK v Gray v Priddis
Can't go wrong with either of them but I think Gray has more improvement left in him
Quote from: GoLions on January 30, 2016, 07:10:05 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on January 30, 2016, 07:07:31 PM
Francis, Weitering, Oliver, Mills, Parish, Wells, Simpkin
Or
KK, Bartel, 5 117k rookies
Depends who those rookies would be. Bartel is a massive lock for me though. Can you change Weitering to Bartel if you drop Oliver and Mills to 117k rookies?
Agree with this
Dangerfield vs Gray
Sloane vs Wines
Bennell or Barlow?
Quote from: Seamon8er on January 30, 2016, 09:09:58 PM
Bennell or Barlow?
Of the two, I'd take a punt on Barlow, he is a good player, I'd back him to get back or close to his best
Quote from: Mantis on January 30, 2016, 08:11:19 PM
Dangerfield vs Gray
This is a pretty even match, I'd probably look at your Bye Numbers.
Other than Rocky, there are not many R15 premiums that I've seen selected, probably leaning towards Danger
:)
Keep which 3 out of Wells, J Lyons, J Anderson and L Duggan. ?? Or burst a boiler to keep all 4 ??
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 30, 2016, 11:05:38 PM
:)
Keep which 3 out of Wells, J Lyons, J Anderson and L Duggan. ?? Or burst a boiler to keep all 4 ??
Biased for Lyons but he is certainly worth keeping from those 3, hopefully he is a starter for the Crows
Duggan is a good prospect but probably not starting 22
Don't like Wells much but would start him
Anderson doesn't appeal much either, but probable starter for the Roos so I'd take him over Duggan assuming Duggan is in the Eagles' best 22
Quote from: fanTCfool on January 30, 2016, 11:12:46 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 30, 2016, 11:05:38 PM
:)
Keep which 3 out of Wells, J Lyons, J Anderson and L Duggan. ?? Or burst a boiler to keep all 4 ??
Biased for Lyons but he is certainly worth keeping from those 3, hopefully he is a starter for the Crows
Duggan is a good prospect but probably not starting 22
Don't like Wells much but would start him
Anderson doesn't appeal much either, but probable starter for the Roos so I'd take him over Duggan assuming Duggan is in the Eagles' best 22
Totally agree with Lyons but after that things get a bit foggy for me. Thanks for the opinion mate. ???
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 30, 2016, 11:21:16 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on January 30, 2016, 11:12:46 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 30, 2016, 11:05:38 PM
:)
Keep which 3 out of Wells, J Lyons, J Anderson and L Duggan. ?? Or burst a boiler to keep all 4 ??
Biased for Lyons but he is certainly worth keeping from those 3, hopefully he is a starter for the Crows
Duggan is a good prospect but probably not starting 22
Don't like Wells much but would start him
Anderson doesn't appeal much either, but probable starter for the Roos so I'd take him over Duggan assuming Duggan is in the Eagles' best 22
Totally agree with Lyons but after that things get a bit foggy for me. Thanks for the opinion mate. ???
Does get a little sloppy, good luck with it!
Quote from: fanTCfool on January 30, 2016, 11:12:46 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on January 30, 2016, 11:05:38 PM
:)
Keep which 3 out of Wells, J Lyons, J Anderson and L Duggan. ?? Or burst a boiler to keep all 4 ??
Biased for Lyons but he is certainly worth keeping from those 3, hopefully he is a starter for the Crows
Duggan is a good prospect but probably not starting 22
Don't like Wells much but would start him
Anderson doesn't appeal much either, but probable starter for the Roos so I'd take him over Duggan assuming Duggan is in the Eagles' best 22
Duggan had cemented his spot until he got injured
"Midway through last season, the West Coast youngster had established himself â€" both in the team and as a star of the future â€" before a posterior cruciate ligament injury in his right knee in July prematurely ended his campaign."
http://www.perthnow.com.au/sport/afl/teams/west-coast/west-coast-eagles-youngster-liam-duggan-says-he-can-take-plenty-from-2015-despite-injury-blow/news-story/91447a20f09dcc420c0ed475774d96b4
Duggan is 100% in Eagles best 22. He has one of the best foot skills. Simo loves him. He's in top 20 selected for sure last year. Into second year so should be even better now and be even more certain of a starter. Just his scoring you need to worry about. Will up his average to 70-75 I reckon.
Parker or Bont
Quote from: auscoyote on January 31, 2016, 01:14:29 AM
Parker or Bont
Pretty even... Parker will get better under a tag this year or it'll leave him and hanners will attract it I expect 105-110. Bont is however a freakish talent as we all know and has the potential to do what Selwood, Fyfe, Rockliff etc... Have done before him and breakout early in his career. It's too even for me a. Because there's risk in both b. There's upside in both.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on January 31, 2016, 01:26:43 AM
Quote from: auscoyote on January 31, 2016, 01:14:29 AM
Parker or Bont
Pretty even... Parker will get better under a tag this year or it'll leave him and hanners will attract it I expect 105-110. Bont is however a freakish talent as we all know and has the potential to do what Selwood, Fyfe, Rockliff etc... Have done before him and breakout early in his career. It's too even for me a. Because there's risk in both b. There's upside in both.
Haha, my thoughts exactly. That's why i posed the question.
The unknown is the libba effect, who will get the tag at the doggies and who will get off the leash.
It should be Bonts breakout year or he should at least increase his average by at least 5 i would imagine.
With the capped rotations, mids who can kick goals resting fwd will be a factor imo. Parker has him pipped there but if Bont breaks out than he should have the bigger upside.
I cant split them either :-\
Quote from: auscoyote on January 31, 2016, 02:05:43 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on January 31, 2016, 01:59:56 AM
Quote from: auscoyote on January 31, 2016, 01:14:29 AM
Parker or Bont
Personally rate Wines over both of them
Already have wines at M5 ;)
Lovely haha. Well in that case then if you could Ward would be my choice but if you don't have the money then I would opt for Parker.
Quote from: fanTCfool on January 31, 2016, 10:18:47 AM
Quote from: fanTCfool on January 30, 2016, 09:04:59 PM
Sloane vs Wines
Bump because I need an opinion or two
I have both... But Sloane gets the w, I think he will go huge
Lobbe vs Mumford
Hampton vs Aish, both at new clubs, leaning towards hampton but crows have a few vying for the same position
Bews vs E.Mac, both should see plenty of game time, who makes more $$ the quickest
Quote from: hawkboy80 on January 31, 2016, 04:21:35 PM
Hampton vs Aish, both at new clubs, leaning towards hampton but crows have a few vying for the same position
Bews vs E.Mac, both should see plenty of game time, who makes more $$ the quickest
Aish for now, watch Hampton in NAB though.
EMac without a doubt
Quote from: hawkboy80 on January 31, 2016, 04:21:35 PM
Hampton vs Aish, both at new clubs, leaning towards hampton but crows have a few vying for the same position
Bews vs E.Mac, both should see plenty of game time, who makes more $$ the quickest
Aish for me, just, as I don't think either are locked in the best 22
Emac by a mile, proven 70+ scorer, has the potential to be a poor man's Rance and push toward an 80 ave
Smith vs Hurn
Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
Quote from: Gigantor on January 31, 2016, 04:33:19 PM
Smith vs Hurn
Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
I would go smith, thats only a personal preference though
Francis vs Weitiering?
Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:28:12 PM
Francis vs Weitiering?
Francis, easily, should see plenty more game-time than Weitering
Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:24:40 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 31, 2016, 04:33:19 PM
Smith vs Hurn
Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
I would go smith, thats only a personal preference though
Smith for me too.
I can't see where Hurn's improvement would come from after a 75 average last year. At least there was a reason why Smith struggled
Quote from: jfitty on January 31, 2016, 05:45:51 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:24:40 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 31, 2016, 04:33:19 PM
Smith vs Hurn
Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
I would go smith, thats only a personal preference though
Smith for me too.
I can't see where Hurn's improvement would come from after a 75 average last year. At least there was a reason why Smith struggled
Given the decimation of the Eagles' defense, Hurn had a pretty good reason imo.
Balic vs Silvagni or any other 117k forward rookie aside from Brown or tipungwati
Quote from: MC on January 31, 2016, 05:50:20 PM
Quote from: jfitty on January 31, 2016, 05:45:51 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:24:40 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on January 31, 2016, 04:33:19 PM
Smith vs Hurn
Everyone is loving Smith but hes had one 90+ year where as Hurn has had multiple 90 years (unsubbed)
I would go smith, thats only a personal preference though
Smith for me too.
I can't see where Hurn's improvement would come from after a 75 average last year. At least there was a reason why Smith struggled
Given the decimation of the Eagles' defense, Hurn had a pretty good reason imo.
Hmm that's true, I'd still prefer Smith
Quote from: TexR74 on January 31, 2016, 05:52:48 PM
Balic vs Silvagni or any other 117k forward rookie aside from Brown or tipungwati
Unimportant and irrelevant at the moment
S Gray vs Z Merrett
Quote from: TexR74 on February 01, 2016, 10:17:34 AM
S Gray vs Z Merrett
Merrett man. Your picking them as a keeper and Gray has only showed premo-ish scoring over half a year. To do it a full year is a whole different story. Merrett is cemented in the Bombers midfield and will have an even bigger responsibility/time in the middle now with all the Bombers outs
Aish (d5) + C.Sinclair (R2) vs Nic nat + 117k rookie
Quote from: Samsturmfels on February 01, 2016, 01:50:44 PM
Aish (d5) + C.Sinclair (R2) vs Nic nat + 117k rookie
NN & Rookie
I have Martin at R1 and if i have both him and nic nat i may not end up getting Goldy later on, which may hurt
i don't think he has done enough to merret a spot in my side, i would prefer neither but if i had to S. Gray
Blicavs vs Mumford for my R2
Quote from: TexR74 on February 01, 2016, 10:37:29 PM
Blicavs vs Mumford for my R2
Blicavs. Mumford will probably average more but it comes down to whether you want to waste a trade on him when he eventually gets injured. Blicavs will also benefit from the interchange cap as well, so an easy choice for me.
Quote from: TomK on February 01, 2016, 10:38:56 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 01, 2016, 10:37:29 PM
Blicavs vs Mumford for my R2
Blicavs. Mumford will probably average more but it comes down to whether you want to waste a trade on him when he eventually gets injured. Blicavs will also benefit from the interchange cap as well, so an easy choice for me.
Blicavs also won't be rucking this year according to the coach, can he average premium numbers as a mid-only? He scored quite a few points from hit-outs and HOTA last year...
Leuenberger Vs Jamar
JPK + Francis
Vs
Crouch + Simpson
Quote from: frenzy on February 02, 2016, 05:58:49 PM
Leuenberger Vs Jamar
Ugh, neither?! If I HAD to choose i'd go with Berger.
Jamar is so old, and his best ever SC year was an average of 86 from 15 games back in 2011
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 02, 2016, 07:40:48 PM
JPK + Francis
Vs
Crouch + Simpson
JPK and a rookie for me. Whether that rookie is Francis or not will depend on the NAB. Crouch too much of a risk at this stage, will need to see some very solid performances before I run with him.
montagna vs lids
Quote from: TomK on February 01, 2016, 10:38:56 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 01, 2016, 10:37:29 PM
Blicavs vs Mumford for my R2
Blicavs. Mumford will probably average more but it comes down to whether you want to waste a trade on him when he eventually gets injured. Blicavs will also benefit from the interchange cap as well, so an easy choice for me.
Whilst on this question, will Blicavs do any tap ruck work, and if so, how will his SC figures be impacted by Dangerfield ?? ??
Totally ignoring dollars, Dangerfield v R Gray.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 03, 2016, 06:31:52 AM
Quote from: TomK on February 01, 2016, 10:38:56 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 01, 2016, 10:37:29 PM
Blicavs vs Mumford for my R2
Blicavs. Mumford will probably average more but it comes down to whether you want to waste a trade on him when he eventually gets injured. Blicavs will also benefit from the interchange cap as well, so an easy choice for me.
Whilst on this question, will Blicavs do any tap ruck work, and if so, how will his SC figures be impacted by Dangerfield ?? ??
Totally ignoring dollars, Dangerfield v R Gray.
1. Blicavs will drop points this year, he won't be rucking anywhere near as much. I predict around 95 for him, which isn't enough.
2. Dangerfield 100% - proven premium scorer over a longer period, with a higher ceiling.
Buddy vs stevie J
Quote from: frenzy on February 03, 2016, 08:47:29 PM
Buddy vs stevie J
Neither, but if u had to choose go buddy
Sloane vs Shiel vs Mitchell
:)
I think Sheil is ready to explode. All he has to do is stay on the park.
Sloane will handle the extra attention without Danger.
Mitchell's calendar tells him he is getting older but his body hasn't noticed it yet.
So Shiel, Sloane then Mitchell for mine ;)
Devon Smith v Barlow v Toby Greene for f3?
Quote from: JMAN23 on February 03, 2016, 10:33:15 PM
Devon Smith v Barlow v Toby Greene for f3?
Could go any way really, but for me:
Barlow>Greene>Smith
Quote from: JMAN23 on February 03, 2016, 10:33:15 PM
Devon Smith v Barlow v Toby Greene for f3?
Barlow, Greene and then daylight to Smith. :)
Pendles and mills/hopper
Vs
Wines omeara
KK vs Rampe vs Bartel
Deledio + Tippett vs Buddy + Smartin
Cheers all
Quote from: eaglesman on February 03, 2016, 11:15:53 PM
Pendles and mills/hopper
Vs
Wines omeara
Pendles because of the C factor but this is one hard choice. Depends on JOM really
Quote from: Spite on February 03, 2016, 11:54:04 PM
Deledio + Tippett vs Buddy + Smartin
Cheers all
Buddy and Stefan, think Buddy is in for a big year
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 03, 2016, 10:52:42 PM
Quote from: JMAN23 on February 03, 2016, 10:33:15 PM
Devon Smith v Barlow v Toby Greene for f3?
Barlow, Greene and then daylight to Smith. :)
Think you're being a bit harsh on Smiddy there! Will push for top 10 imo, would have him ahead of Greene in SC. Barlow ahead of both though.
Kerridge vs Parish ?
price not the issue, JS and Scoring potential really
Quote from: T Dog on February 04, 2016, 11:14:42 AM
Kerridge vs Parish ?
price not the issue, JS and Scoring potential really
Tough call, but I'd go Kerridge. His JS is solid, and while not a prolific scorer, should do better than a draftee like Parish.
Lobbe and Francis vs. Leuey and Aish.
Kade (Blues) Vs Kade (Suns)
Quote from: jeesh on February 04, 2016, 07:29:57 PM
Kade (Blues) Vs Kade (Suns)
KK has more upside. You know what you will get with Simmo but KK could be anywhere from 90 - 100 so i'd back him in.
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 04, 2016, 07:48:12 PM
Quote from: jeesh on February 04, 2016, 07:29:57 PM
Kade (Blues) Vs Kade (Suns)
KK has more upside. You know what you will get with Simmo but KK could be anywhere from 90 - 100 so i'd back him in.
imo KK could be anywhere from 80-100
Makes Simmo a little more attractive
Simmo simply doesn't miss games, it's a massive plus.
yeo vs smith
Quote from: Jackross10 on February 04, 2016, 08:26:50 PM
yeo vs smith
I'd be taking Smith. I like Yeo but I feel he is the utility and will be thrown back and all around if needed which will hurt his scores in some games.
Same topic: KK or Smith + 70k?
Quote from: Swoozie on February 05, 2016, 11:15:20 AM
Quote from: Jackross10 on February 04, 2016, 08:26:50 PM
yeo vs smith
I'd be taking Smith. I like Yeo but I feel he is the utility and will be thrown back and all around if needed which will hurt his scores in some games.
Same topic: KK or Smith + 70k?
Smith easy. KK wont be getting as much all with the other Gc mids back actually think smith will outscore him.
Goldy Simpkin Hopper + 70k
v
Fyfe Lobbe Allen
Hopper (mid) or N.Cockatoo (fwd)
Quote from: Holz on February 05, 2016, 01:07:18 PM
Goldy Simpkin Hopper + 70k
v
Fyfe Lobbe Allen
Option #1 for me. Goldy will be too hard to bring in otherwise, meaning you could miss some monsters! Fyfe on the other hand is a virtual unknown for this year in regards to his role/scoring potential.
Quote from: hawkboy80 on February 05, 2016, 01:32:15 PM
Hopper (mid) or N.Cockatoo (fwd)
very very easy Hopper, kinda depends which fwd is picked but on this information if hopper plays he will be one of the best rookies.
Quote from: hawkboy80 on February 05, 2016, 01:32:15 PM
Hopper (mid) or N.Cockatoo (fwd)
I'd be inclined to start both if they are named rd1. Two of the best potential rookie scorers from all reports. For now i'd suggest Hopper as a place holder, it's easier to drop him back than to free up cash the other way!
Gray + fwd rookie vs Barlow + Hopper
leaning towards the 2nd option at the moment
Quote from: Big Mac on February 05, 2016, 02:48:37 PM
Gray + fwd rookie vs Barlow + Hopper
leaning towards the 2nd option at the moment
Depends on the rest of your forwards and mids really. But i would defs start Barlow in the forward line :)
Goldy + Omeara vs Lobbe + Pendles
Quote from: GraysFan on February 05, 2016, 08:15:52 PM
Goldy + Omeara vs Lobbe + Pendles
1st option, although i'd be keen to try and find another way to fit in Pendles
Wells v Simpkin v Anderson
Assuming all 3 line up rd1 and only one spot is available (F5)
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 06, 2016, 10:03:10 AM
Wells v Simpkin v Anderson
Assuming all 3 line up rd1 and only one spot is available (F5)
Simpkin>Wells>Anderson
Wells injury history puts him at no.2 for me. Anderson: has he shown enough? Simpkin: Strong VFL showing last year. An AFL reprieve normally keeps a player focussed for a season as he'll be trying to get another contract.
Shaw & Docherty vs McVeigh & Rance
this one's giving me many restless nights
Shiel vs Wines or maybe even cunnington as a POD?
Quote from: TexR74 on February 07, 2016, 01:45:46 AM
this one's giving me many restless nights
Shiel vs Wines or maybe even cunnington as a POD?
Wines for me.
Port have an excellent draw and he is only going to get better. Also the attention from the opposition will still remain with Gray and Boak.
Shiel may cop more attention after his brilliant early season but is also a valid option
Craig bird vs matthew Wright as Friday and potential F6/7 n mud bench cover
Quote from: Bluesman on February 07, 2016, 10:45:19 AM
Craig bird vs matthew Wright as Friday and potential F6/7 n mud bench cover
\]
New club so you never know whether he'll fit in or where he'll fit in. I'm sure most people have their eyes on him but it's very much NAB and wait and see
Darcey Parish or Ryan Crowley
Both will play... Crowley will probably get more games AND I've been hearing (albeit only rumours) that he'll play less of a tagging role and more of a pure MID
Both $202,800... but Crowley has a career average of 62 (tagging). Do we think Parish can beat that?
Quote from: timtim on February 07, 2016, 02:26:22 PM
Darcey Parish or Ryan Crowley
Both will play... Crowley will probably get more games AND I've been hearing (albeit only rumours) that he'll play less of a tagging role and more of a pure MID
Both $202,800... but Crowley has a career average of 62 (tagging). Do we think Parish can beat that?
Hmm tough one, I would go neither but if I had to pick one I would go Francis
Fyfe vs Danger
(Already have Pendles, GAJ and Rocky)
Quote from: Gigantor on February 07, 2016, 03:02:37 PM
Fyfe vs Danger
(Already have Pendles, GAJ and Rocky)
Same dimena here. Fyfe if fit I think but I do believe Danger can go 118-120 again this year at the cats. Fyfe will go 125+ if all goes to plan.
One of my own.
EMAC (D4) + Fyfe (M1) + 200-250k mid (M7) + Dahl (F2)
Vs
117 k rook (D5-8) + JPK (M3) + Wines (M6) + Devon Smith (D3)
and Smith vs Zerrett
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 07, 2016, 05:21:20 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on February 07, 2016, 03:02:37 PM
Fyfe vs Danger
(Already have Pendles, GAJ and Rocky)
Same dimena here. Fyfe if fit I think but I do believe Danger can go 118-120 again this year at the cats. Fyfe will go 125+ if all goes to plan.
One of my own.
EMAC (D4) + Fyfe (M1) + 200-250k mid (M7) + Dahl (F2)
Vs
117 k rook (D5-8) + JPK (M3) + Wines (M6) + Devon Smith (D3)
and Smith vs Zerrett
option 1 if Fyfe is good to go
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 07, 2016, 05:21:20 PM
Quote from: Gigantor on February 07, 2016, 03:02:37 PM
One of my own.
EMAC (D4) + Fyfe (M1) + 200-250k mid (M7) + Dahl (F2)
Vs
117 k rook (D5-8) + JPK (M3) + Wines (M6) + Devon Smith (D3)
and Smith vs Zerrett
First option & Smith
2 of Zorko/Wingard/Barlow ? F2&F3
Danger & Stef Martin VS Wines & Goldy??
Cheers
Quote from: Bluesman on February 07, 2016, 08:33:29 PM
Danger & Stef Martin VS Wines & Goldy??
Cheers
Danger and Martin ...
KK and Parish
Danger and 117k rookie defender
(if I go with the danger option I would only have 3 premium defenders and 5 117k rookies)
Pick 2: Zorko V Wingard V Barlow
Quote from: Money Shot on February 07, 2016, 09:18:30 PM
KK and Parish
Danger and 117k rookie defender
(if I go with the danger option I would only have 3 premium defenders and 5 117k rookies)
KK and Parish, only on the basis that even though we haven't seen any rookies yet in NAB, I doubt we'd get 5 117k rookies down back
Quote from: dosstheboss on February 07, 2016, 09:39:03 PM
Pick 2: Zorko V Wingard V Barlow
Wingard and Barlow
Shaw + 123k Rookie vs Duryea + Wells
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 07, 2016, 11:08:02 PM
Shaw + 123k Rookie vs Duryea + Wells
Shaw + rookie.
Shaw will still be a top 6 defender IMO even though he should drop in price.
A bit too much risk with Duryea. Wells should be strongly considered however (I have changed my mind on Wells)
Quote from: Money Shot on February 07, 2016, 09:18:30 PM
KK and Parish
Danger and 117k rookie defender
(if I go with the danger option I would only have 3 premium defenders and 5 117k rookies)
Danger and 117k rookie defender
Danger is a gun and I still am contemplating how to fit him in my side. Im guessing you have the Essendon M.Brown (who is 117k) but there are a couple of other options IMO are a good round 1 chance.
1 is Hartley from Essendon who is a mature aged KPP who will play as we don't have many of them available with the drug bans and the other is Bonner from Port Adelaide who they are absolutely raving about. Need to watch NAB though.
With a fully fit Malceski and returning players in the suns midfield I am unsure about KK at this stage. Need to watch him in the NAB. Parish will have a tough initiation with all the bans. Will play every week as I think he is a gun but is a lean body type who will get bullied around in the contests.
R.Gray v Danger v Priddis
Quote from: AaronKirk on February 08, 2016, 03:32:00 AM
R.Gray v Danger v Priddis
I had Gray in my side for the past few weeks but changed him to danger last week
Cant go wrong with either. Gray if you need the cash elsewhere or danger if you can afford
Danger will average more for the year, but may possibly start a touch slower than Gray. I think Gray is good for 110-ish, Danger 115-ish.
Priddis is such a classic case, he's the Daniel Cross of the 110-average players - always so consistent! He even snuck through to win a Brownlow and still, no one picks him haha
Tippet Vs Buddy
Quote from: NickyBoy on February 08, 2016, 09:36:53 PM
Tippet Vs Buddy
Buddy all the way, Tippett will frustrate you when he pulls in his regular shockers. Granted Buddy can do the same but not as often. If Tippett rucks there may be a solid case but with Sinclair being the number 1 man I'm not so sure.
Quote from: NickyBoy on February 08, 2016, 09:36:53 PM
Tippet Vs Buddy
Buddy, but don't bank on him being a keeper.
wines (m5) and wells (f4) vs dahl (f4) and parish (m6)
Quote from: Jackross10 on February 08, 2016, 11:23:25 PM
wines (m5) and wells (f4) vs dahl (f4) and parish (m6)
Wines & Wells
Wines (F4) & Simpkin (F5) vs Ward (F4) & Kennedy (F5)
Quote from: brudski on February 09, 2016, 12:40:48 AM
Wines (F4) & Simpkin (F5) vs Ward (F4) & Kennedy (F5)
Assuming you meant M4 for Wines/Ward ;)
I personally have got both of Wines & Simpkin currently in my squad. In this instance though I believe that JJK is a far better choice than Simpkin, with Wines only slightly better than Ward, so i'd say option 2.
Quote from: MC on February 09, 2016, 09:40:11 AM
Quote from: brudski on February 09, 2016, 12:40:48 AM
Wines (F4) & Simpkin (F5) vs Ward (F4) & Kennedy (F5)
Assuming you meant M4 for Wines/Ward ;)
I personally have got both of Wines & Simpkin currently in my squad. In this instance though I believe that JJK is a far better choice than Simpkin, with Wines only slightly better than Ward, so i'd say option 2.
Pretty sure he means Ben Kennedy, not JJK
Option 1 for me
Quote from: Big Mac on February 09, 2016, 11:51:44 AM
Quote from: MC on February 09, 2016, 09:40:11 AM
Quote from: brudski on February 09, 2016, 12:40:48 AM
Wines (F4) & Simpkin (F5) vs Ward (F4) & Kennedy (F5)
Assuming you meant M4 for Wines/Ward ;)
I personally have got both of Wines & Simpkin currently in my squad. In this instance though I believe that JJK is a far better choice than Simpkin, with Wines only slightly better than Ward, so i'd say option 2.
Pretty sure he means Ben Kennedy, not JJK
Option 1 for me
Oh, of course! Wow that was stupid! Definitely option 1 then.
Wines vs Shiel
Quote from: Jimmykidd on February 09, 2016, 07:09:45 PM
Wines vs Shiel
Everyone will say wines, but Shiel is just as good a pick imo
Shiel VS R.Gray
Mhmm, I'd go Robbie there too
Hurn vs Yeo?
Malceski and Simpkin
V
Bartel and 117k rookie
I know it's a bit early too tell.
Laird vs KK
Quote from: brudski on February 10, 2016, 02:14:16 AM
Hurn vs Yeo?
Yeo for me, but I'm warming to Hurn a little more. Yeo's potential midfield role though gives him the edge.
Quote from: Money Shot on February 10, 2016, 08:46:31 AM
Malceski and Simpkin
V
Bartel and 117k rookie
I know it's a bit early too tell.
Bit too early like you said, but leaning towards Bartel and rookie
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 10, 2016, 09:36:46 AM
Laird vs KK
Very similar I reckon, can see Laird being a little more consistent if he plays the same role, but KK should improve on his average again last year. So KK, just.
Gray & Malceski V Zorko/Wingard & KK
Quote from: dosstheboss on February 10, 2016, 10:01:57 AM
Gray & Malceski V Zorko/Wingard & KK
Tricky!
Gray 110 V Zork/Wing 100
Malc 90? KK 90-95
You'd probably have to go with B given the uncertainty of Malc... But either option isn't too bad really.
Quote from: dosstheboss on February 10, 2016, 10:01:57 AM
Gray & Malceski V Zorko/Wingard & KK
I'd be leaning towards Wingard and KK, pending Malceski's NAB form
Wingard has also had a interrupted preseason.
Zorko/KK for me
Quote from: Money Shot on February 10, 2016, 08:46:31 AM
Malceski and Simpkin
V
Bartel and 117k rookie
I know it's a bit early too tell.
malceski & simpkin, I think bartel will miss a few games either rested or injury
Goldy + Gray v Fyfe + S Martin/Mumford
Quote from: _wato on February 10, 2016, 04:14:06 PM
Goldy + Gray v Fyfe + S Martin/Mumford
Goldy and Gray, simply because I trust Goldy to back up better than I do Fyfe, given his injury concerns. Mumford is also an uncertainty in regards to injuries.
Quote from: LordSneeze on February 10, 2016, 02:47:15 PM
Wingard has also had a interrupted preseason.
Zorko/KK for me
Has he really? Hmm, injury related?
Quote from: jfitty on February 10, 2016, 04:41:08 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on February 10, 2016, 02:47:15 PM
Wingard has also had a interrupted preseason.
Zorko/KK for me
Has he really? Hmm, injury related?
Wingard was on light duties before Christmas, but has since been training with both the Mids and Forwards.. I expect him to have a much bigger tank this year
Quote from: GraysFan on February 10, 2016, 07:31:37 PM
Quote from: jfitty on February 10, 2016, 04:41:08 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on February 10, 2016, 02:47:15 PM
Wingard has also had a interrupted preseason.
Zorko/KK for me
Has he really? Hmm, injury related?
Wingard was on light duties before Christmas, but has since been training with both the Mids and Forwards.. I expect him to have a much bigger tank this year
That's my gut feeling.. I reckon this season he'll score way more consistently with less of those sub-70 scores
Quote from: GraysFan on February 10, 2016, 07:31:37 PM
Quote from: jfitty on February 10, 2016, 04:41:08 PM
Quote from: LordSneeze on February 10, 2016, 02:47:15 PM
Wingard has also had a interrupted preseason.
Zorko/KK for me
Has he really? Hmm, injury related?
Wingard was on light duties before Christmas, but has since been training with both the Mids and Forwards.. I expect him to have a much bigger tank this year
Yep, Knee kept him out of full training for a while.
Have it on good information that he is about 2 weeks behind in fitness than the core of the team.
N.Cockatoo (Cats) Vs B.Kennedy (Dees)
Quote from: FactHunt on February 11, 2016, 06:36:30 PM
N.Cockatoo (Cats) Vs B.Kennedy (Dees)
Tough one
I'd go with cockatoo
Stringer vs Merrett
Stringer
who would you get in order??
Birchall vs. Yeo vs. Rampe vs. Broadbent vs. Taylor
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 11, 2016, 09:00:08 PM
who would you get in order??
Birchall vs. Yeo vs. Rampe vs. Broadbent vs. Taylor
Order as posted
cheers fellas, I liked the idea of Birch in my side since Lake is gone.
Danger v Fyfe
danger is an unknown element @ Geelong.
Fyfe might start slow due to his slight injury.
hmmm... tough choice. not starting with either but if forced to i'll go with Fyfe.
his back might slow him down a tad but at least he is not an unknown element like Danger is with his new team.
Quote from: Money Shot on February 12, 2016, 09:02:36 AM
Danger v Fyfe
As stated by Keeper, both are a risk. I'd be leaning towards Danger over Fyfe though, as i'd rather pick someone who was closer to 100% fit in my squad.
Quote from: MC on February 12, 2016, 09:31:12 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 12, 2016, 09:02:36 AM
Danger v Fyfe
As stated by Keeper, both are a risk. I'd be leaning towards Danger over Fyfe though, as i'd rather pick someone who was closer to 100% fit in my squad.
Fyfe doesn't need to be 100% to score well, he got 90 in the Prelim with a broken leg!
Priddis + Forward rookie v Crouch + Wells & $300k
Quote from: Discomaniac on February 12, 2016, 03:11:15 PM
Priddis + Forward rookie v Crouch + Wells & $300k
Priddis and rook
Shaw, R.Sloane and Lobbe vs B.Smith, Libba and Goldy
Quote from: dmac07 on February 12, 2016, 03:53:45 PM
Shaw, R.Sloane and Lobbe vs B.Smith, Libba and Goldy
Option 2
2 keepers + 1 stepping stone vs 3 keepers.
Agree with sneeze. Not sold on lobbe. don't think he's a keeper
Fyfe + Zerrett vs JPK + Dahl
Think 2 myself but only just. Personally not sold on Zerrett as he still has a bit to step up to reach prem status and in a below par team may find it difficult.
So stay away from Danger and Fyfe for now?
Quote from: Gigantor on February 07, 2016, 03:01:39 PM
Quote from: timtim on February 07, 2016, 02:26:22 PM
Darcey Parish or Ryan Crowley
Both will play... Crowley will probably get more games AND I've been hearing (albeit only rumours) that he'll play less of a tagging role and more of a pure MID
Both $202,800... but Crowley has a career average of 62 (tagging). Do we think Parish can beat that?
Hmm tough one, I would go neither but if I had to pick one I would go Francis
For what it's worth - http://www.afl.com.au/news/2016-02-12/ryan-crowley-will-play-forward-as-well-as-tag-for-essendon
Quote from: Money Shot on February 12, 2016, 06:49:42 PM
So stay away from Danger and Fyfe for now?
Fyfe definitely... but starting Danger as a POD would not be the worst idea in the world
Zerrett or Stringer?
Polec or anderson.
Bont v Wines v Cotchin
Stringer + Forward rookie v Simpkin + Wells
Quote from: Keith Urban on February 12, 2016, 11:09:00 PM
Stringer + Forward rookie v Simpkin + Wells
simpkin + wells
Malceski v KK
AND
Is anyone considering Polec over Crouch/Jaeger?
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2016, 11:14:46 AM
Malceski v KK
AND
Is anyone considering Polec over Crouch/Jaeger?
They're all injury prone, and Polec is possibly the most injury prone of the lot - thought about him but not for me.
And, KK
Fyfe vs Pendles vs Danger
Pick 2 (currently have Fyfe and Pendles, but thinking Danger could be a great POD if he gets off to a good start)
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 12:48:30 PM
Fyfe vs Pendles vs Danger
Pick 2 (currently have Fyfe and Pendles, but thinking Danger could be a great POD if he gets off to a good start)
It's really Fyfe v Danger isn't it. Pendles is ticked.
Maybe take a punt on Danger.
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 13, 2016, 11:15:56 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 13, 2016, 11:14:46 AM
Malceski v KK
AND
Is anyone considering Polec over Crouch/Jaeger?
They're all injury prone, and Polec is possibly the most injury prone of the lot - thought about him but not for me.
And, KK
Agree. At 303k he probably isn't too bad an option but prefer Crouch/Jaeger
Quote from: enzedder on February 13, 2016, 12:56:09 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 12:48:30 PM
Fyfe vs Pendles vs Danger
Pick 2 (currently have Fyfe and Pendles, but thinking Danger could be a great POD if he gets off to a good start)
It's really Fyfe v Danger isn't it. Pendles is ticked.
Maybe take a punt on Danger.
Yeah I've had Pendles locked for a while now, but was just thinking that Danger and Fyfe could both be really really expensive if they get off to a good start, whereas Pendles is usually at a relatively attainable price (for an elite mid).
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 01:17:16 PM
Quote from: enzedder on February 13, 2016, 12:56:09 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 12:48:30 PM
Fyfe vs Pendles vs Danger
Pick 2 (currently have Fyfe and Pendles, but thinking Danger could be a great POD if he gets off to a good start)
It's really Fyfe v Danger isn't it. Pendles is ticked.
Maybe take a punt on Danger.
Yeah I've had Pendles locked for a while now, but was just thinking that Danger and Fyfe could both be really really expensive if they get off to a good start, whereas Pendles is usually at a relatively attainable price (for an elite mid).
I see where you're coming from but I'm also reasonably certain Pendles has been over 700k in the past.
Seeds vs. Mackenzie for D5
Ok one more, mainly because I wanted to see what my mids would be like if I didn't have any midpricers
Birchall, Libba, Crouch vs B Smith, Dangerfield, Mid Rookie
Would give me a midfield of: Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Gaz, Rocky, Mills, Hopper, Gresham
Damn that is tempting
B Smith is a trap
Quote from: meow meow on February 13, 2016, 03:46:04 PM
B Smith is a trap
Yeah, that's why he wasn't currently in my team haha, not too confident with him. Could also go with Hurn over Smith. Or downgrade one of Mills/Hopper. Just basically depends on whether it's worth sacrificing someone like Birchall or a top end mid rookie plus Libba/Crouch to squeeze in another elite mid.
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 03:53:55 PM
Quote from: meow meow on February 13, 2016, 03:46:04 PM
B Smith is a trap
Yeah, that's why he wasn't currently in my team haha, not too confident with him. Could also go with Hurn over Smith. Or downgrade one of Mills/Hopper. Just basically depends on whether it's worth sacrificing someone like Birchall or a top end mid rookie plus Libba/Crouch to squeeze in another elite mid.
Yeah considering whether it is worth having Wells (after hearing about their intra) at F5 or upgrading Smith to a Simpson/KK. My mid, fwd and rucks are looking awesome with 2 rookies in those two lines collectively and I am opting to take a massive risk going Bartel, Smith, Malc and then 3 117k rookies. BOOM or Bust
Sandi vs Goldy
saves $110k and should score the same.
Quote from: frenzy on February 13, 2016, 04:31:00 PM
Sandi vs Goldy
saves $110k and should score the same.
Should they? Goldy can go 120+, doubt Sandi will go 110. Also more likely that Sandi could miss a game here or there. If I weren't going to start Goldy, I'd be going with NicNat and Stefan
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 03:22:31 PM
Ok one more, mainly because I wanted to see what my mids would be like if I didn't have any midpricers
Birchall, Libba, Crouch vs B Smith, Dangerfield, Mid Rookie
Would give me a midfield of: Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Gaz, Rocky, Mills, Hopper, Gresham
Damn that is tempting
It's nice but it's missing Libba. Must have... It's like saying no thanks to free beer.
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 04:33:50 PM
Quote from: frenzy on February 13, 2016, 04:31:00 PM
Sandi vs Goldy
saves $110k and should score the same.
Should they? Goldy can go 120+, doubt Sandi will go 110. Also more likely that Sandi could miss a game here or there. If I weren't going to start Goldy, I'd be going with NicNat and Stefan
Agree. They are the best 3... Goldy, Nic Nat, Martin. Only others I'd contemplate are Mummy and Lobbe. Some risk with the last two but reasons to get them nonetheless.
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 04:33:50 PM
Quote from: frenzy on February 13, 2016, 04:31:00 PM
Sandi vs Goldy
saves $110k and should score the same.
Should they? Goldy can go 120+, doubt Sandi will go 110. Also more likely that Sandi could miss a game here or there. If I weren't going to start Goldy, I'd be going with NicNat and Stefan
Hope for Norf's sake Goldy backs up his 120+ once last season, Sandi has gone 110 4 or 5 times in the past.
career ave. Goldy 97
Sandi 95
Nic Nat 91
Martin 82
Sandilands used to be a staple diet, now it seems he's a massive POD.
Priddis v Dayne Beams Priddis the more consistent but Beams has the greater upside.
Quote from: frenzy on February 13, 2016, 05:08:15 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 04:33:50 PM
Quote from: frenzy on February 13, 2016, 04:31:00 PM
Sandi vs Goldy
saves $110k and should score the same.
Should they? Goldy can go 120+, doubt Sandi will go 110. Also more likely that Sandi could miss a game here or there. If I weren't going to start Goldy, I'd be going with NicNat and Stefan
Hope for Norf's sake Goldy backs up his 120+ once last season, Sandi has gone 110 4 or 5 times in the past.
career ave. Goldy 97
Sandi 95
Nic Nat 91
Martin 82
Sandilands used to be a staple diet, now it seems he's a massive POD.
Sandi has gone 110+ 3 times
2010 - 114 - 19 games
2011 - 110.7 -
13 games2012 - 111.8 -
12 gamesSandi could be a great POD as R2, but there is now way I'd be picking him over Goldy
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 05:22:32 PM
Quote from: frenzy on February 13, 2016, 05:08:15 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 04:33:50 PM
Quote from: frenzy on February 13, 2016, 04:31:00 PM
Sandi vs Goldy
saves $110k and should score the same.
Should they? Goldy can go 120+, doubt Sandi will go 110. Also more likely that Sandi could miss a game here or there. If I weren't going to start Goldy, I'd be going with NicNat and Stefan
Hope for Norf's sake Goldy backs up his 120+ once last season, Sandi has gone 110 4 or 5 times in the past.
career ave. Goldy 97
Sandi 95
Nic Nat 91
Martin 82
Sandilands used to be a staple diet, now it seems he's a massive POD.
Sandi has gone 110+ 3 times
2010 - 114 - 19 games
2011 - 110.7 - 13 games
2012 - 111.8 - 12 games
Sandi could be a great POD as R2, but there is now way I'd be picking him over Goldy
Age has gotta be getting the better of Sandi now, he's gotta miss a few games throughout the year
Quote from: Ringo on February 13, 2016, 05:22:23 PM
Priddis v Dayne Beams Priddis the more consistent but Beams has the greater upside.
Obviously I'm gonna say Beams haha, but he did average around 120ish after his first month settling into the side (and before he injured his shoulder). He'll most likely be a top 6 mid if he stays uninjured, but that is of course a risk in itself, whether he'll play the entire season or not. If you trust he'll stay fit, then definitely Beams.
Quote from: GoLions on February 13, 2016, 05:24:33 PM
Quote from: Ringo on February 13, 2016, 05:22:23 PM
Priddis v Dayne Beams Priddis the more consistent but Beams has the greater upside.
Obviously I'm gonna say Beams haha, but he did average around 120ish after his first month settling into the side (and before he injured his shoulder). He'll most likely be a top 6 mid if he stays uninjured, but that is of course a risk in itself, whether he'll play the entire season or not. If you trust he'll stay fit, then definitely Beams.
Back your lions, Beams over Priddis
Barlow v Mitch Robbo v Tom Bell
Robbo won lions B&F and is a tackling machine
Bell is a wrecking ball and gets plenty of the pill
Barlow has been great but had a poor year last year, I didn't follow him to closely but was there a reason?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on February 13, 2016, 05:50:15 PM
Barlow v Mitch Robbo v Tom Bell
Robbo won lions B&F and is a tackling machine
Bell is a wrecking ball and gets plenty of the pill
Barlow has been great but had a poor year last year, I didn't follow him to closely but was there a reason?
Barlow was moved out of his natural inside mid role last year which obviously hindered his scoring and Ross has said he play move back into that role this year.
Barlow>Robbo>Bell
Quote from: TomK on February 13, 2016, 05:51:46 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on February 13, 2016, 05:50:15 PM
Barlow v Mitch Robbo v Tom Bell
Robbo won lions B&F and is a tackling machine
Bell is a wrecking ball and gets plenty of the pill
Barlow has been great but had a poor year last year, I didn't follow him to closely but was there a reason?
Barlow was moved out of his natural inside mid role last year which obviously hindered his scoring and Ross has said he play move back into that role this year.
Barlow>Robbo>Bell
As a Lions supporter, 100% agree with this.
Quote from: frenzy on February 13, 2016, 04:31:00 PM
Sandi vs Goldy
saves $110k and should score the same.
Sandi's rucking stats were just about career best last year. I doubt he can maintain that again.
Prefer to spend the coin on Goldy
Hoff vs Robinson vs Dahl vs Tippett vs Buddy
Pick One
Just trying to figure out my structure. Here is a quick one:
Option 1: Birchall, Fyfe, fwd rookie
or
Option 2: def rookie, JPK, Wingard
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 13, 2016, 10:34:22 PM
Hoff vs Robinson vs Dahl vs Tippett vs Buddy
Pick One
I've gone with Buddy myself
Dahl and Robbo right behind him though
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 13, 2016, 11:30:24 PM
Just trying to figure out my structure. Here is a quick one:
Option 1: Birchall, Fyfe, fwd rookie
or
Option 2: def rookie, JPK, Wingard
I'd go option 1 for sure
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 13, 2016, 10:34:22 PM
Hoff vs Robinson vs Dahl vs Tippett vs Buddy
Pick One
Dahl if only 1
Quote from: GoLions on February 14, 2016, 01:13:00 AM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 13, 2016, 11:30:24 PM
Just trying to figure out my structure. Here is a quick one:
Option 1: Birchall, Fyfe, fwd rookie
or
Option 2: def rookie, JPK, Wingard
I'd go option 1 for sure
+1
Dahl v Joey Montagna
Quote from: Cotch-9 on February 14, 2016, 03:42:16 PM
Dahl v Joey Montagna
Dahl
Harwood vs MacKenzie vs Francis
Wines + Wells vs Fyfe + Rookie
Quote from: TomK on February 14, 2016, 08:33:16 PM
Wines + Wells vs Fyfe + Rookie
Is there a way to get Fyfe and Wells?
KK + Smith
vs
Simpson + Malceski
lids v Higgins
higgo averaged 94 last year with 100 after the byes.
flying according to north and they have a pretty easy draw to start with.
Quote from: Holz on February 15, 2016, 10:51:40 AM
lids v Higgins
higgo averaged 94 last year with 100 after the byes.
flying according to north and they have a pretty easy draw to start with.
Have to be lids for points i guess, i have dropped lids for barlow however, the 100k does strengthen elsewhere. Higgins a nice pod tho, back ur gut
Matthew Boyd + Robbie Gray vs. Jamie Macmillan + Nat Fyfe
Quote from: DMCC10 on February 15, 2016, 12:24:02 PM
Matthew Boyd + Robbie Gray vs. Jamie Macmillan + Nat Fyfe
a
Rance Lids Hopper v Harwood Higgins/Westhoff Sloane
Quote from: Holz on February 15, 2016, 01:03:51 PM
Rance Lids Hopper v Harwood Higgins/Westhoff Sloane
Option B with Hoff over Higgins. Port's draw looks very good for the Hoff.
:(
Keep 3 only of these 4, SO who goes out ?? Westhoff, K Tippett, M Barlow, C Bird. Please don't love your tits off but out of these I personally rate Westhoff on top. ::)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 15, 2016, 08:13:05 PM
:(
Keep 3 only of these 4, SO who goes out ?? Westhoff, K Tippett, M Barlow, C Bird. Please don't love your tits off but out of these I personally rate Westhoff on top. ::)
I'd take the first 3, Barlow - Hoff - Tippett, even considering price.
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 15, 2016, 08:21:28 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 15, 2016, 08:13:05 PM
:(
Keep 3 only of these 4, SO who goes out ?? Westhoff, K Tippett, M Barlow, C Bird. Please don't love your tits off but out of these I personally rate Westhoff on top. ::)
I'd take the first 3, Barlow - Hoff - Tippett, even considering price.
I'd take Barlow, Hoff, and tbh I'd rather not have any of the other 2 :P
gunston vs buddy vs hoff
Gunston>Buddy> Hoff
Aish vs Eric Mackenzie
Bontempelli v Shiel v Wines
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 12:10:10 AM
Aish vs Eric Mackenzie
Emac
Quote from: Bubbles on February 16, 2016, 12:11:44 AM
Bontempelli v Shiel v Wines
Shiel. I think he's in for a big one, I just don't have the balls to start him
Tough one here...
Goldstein + 591k premo mid
or
Stef Martin + Super Premo mid
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 12:31:13 AM
Tough one here...
Goldstein + 591k premo mid
or
Stef Martin + Super Premo mid
Goldy + Rocky ;)
haha Rocky was 1st picked!
Mids currently..
Gaz, Danger, Rocky, _____, Wines, Libba, Crouch, Gresham (polkinghorne,cunningham,mathieson)
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 12:37:15 AM
haha Rocky was 1st picked!
Mids currently..
Gaz, Danger, Rocky, _____, Wines, Libba, Crouch, Gresham (polkinghorne,cunningham,mathieson)
That's already enough imo. A 7th gun mid would have to be hurting your other lines
Quote from: quinny88 on February 16, 2016, 12:40:22 AM
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 12:37:15 AM
haha Rocky was 1st picked!
Mids currently..
Gaz, Danger, Rocky, _____, Wines, Libba, Crouch, Gresham (polkinghorne,cunningham,mathieson)
That's already enough imo. A 7th gun mid would have to be hurting your other lines
Yep. I'd go with Goldy, upgrade Wines to a Pendles or Fyfe, and then bring in a rookie, using the extra cash to beef up other lines.
Quote from: GoLions on February 16, 2016, 12:54:50 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 16, 2016, 12:40:22 AM
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 12:37:15 AM
haha Rocky was 1st picked!
Mids currently..
Gaz, Danger, Rocky, _____, Wines, Libba, Crouch, Gresham (polkinghorne,cunningham,mathieson)
That's already enough imo. A 7th gun mid would have to be hurting your other lines
Yep. I'd go with Goldy, upgrade Wines to a Pendles or Fyfe, and then bring in a rookie, using the extra cash to beef up other lines.
Yeah i looked at 2 rooks in the mids..had Parish for a while..not sure who now...any other suggestions? Cheers
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 01:04:18 AM
Quote from: GoLions on February 16, 2016, 12:54:50 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 16, 2016, 12:40:22 AM
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 12:37:15 AM
haha Rocky was 1st picked!
Mids currently..
Gaz, Danger, Rocky, _____, Wines, Libba, Crouch, Gresham (polkinghorne,cunningham,mathieson)
That's already enough imo. A 7th gun mid would have to be hurting your other lines
Yep. I'd go with Goldy, upgrade Wines to a Pendles or Fyfe, and then bring in a rookie, using the extra cash to beef up other lines.
Yeah i looked at 2 rooks in the mids..had Parish for a while..not sure who now...any other suggestions? Cheers
Menegola if named would be a good option.
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 01:04:18 AM
Quote from: GoLions on February 16, 2016, 12:54:50 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 16, 2016, 12:40:22 AM
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 12:37:15 AM
haha Rocky was 1st picked!
Mids currently..
Gaz, Danger, Rocky, _____, Wines, Libba, Crouch, Gresham (polkinghorne,cunningham,mathieson)
That's already enough imo. A 7th gun mid would have to be hurting your other lines
Yep. I'd go with Goldy, upgrade Wines to a Pendles or Fyfe, and then bring in a rookie, using the extra cash to beef up other lines.
Yeah i looked at 2 rooks in the mids..had Parish for a while..not sure who now...any other suggestions? Cheers
Find money and get pendles. I have the same structure as you.
Wells and Ceski v Kommer and Bartel
Quote from: Spite on February 16, 2016, 01:37:06 AM
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 01:04:18 AM
Quote from: GoLions on February 16, 2016, 12:54:50 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 16, 2016, 12:40:22 AM
Quote from: HotTiges on February 16, 2016, 12:37:15 AM
haha Rocky was 1st picked!
Mids currently..
Gaz, Danger, Rocky, _____, Wines, Libba, Crouch, Gresham (polkinghorne,cunningham,mathieson)
That's already enough imo. A 7th gun mid would have to be hurting your other lines
Yep. I'd go with Goldy, upgrade Wines to a Pendles or Fyfe, and then bring in a rookie, using the extra cash to beef up other lines.
Yeah i looked at 2 rooks in the mids..had Parish for a while..not sure who now...any other suggestions? Cheers
Find money and get pendles. I have the same structure as you.
Same here. Have Fyfe, Ablett, Pendles, Rocky and Wines.
Option A, try to get pendles in, if not JPK
Simpson + JPK v Birchall + Beams +20k
Quote from: Ringo on February 16, 2016, 01:34:20 PM
Simpson + JPK v Birchall + Beams +20k
Simmo JPK.
jpk should have a big year and simmo is safer then birch and averages more.
Quote from: Ringo on February 16, 2016, 01:34:20 PM
Simpson + JPK v Birchall + Beams +20k
Thats tough pretty much nothing in it in points imo
Simpson 90-95 + JPK 105-110
v
Birch 85-90 + Beams 110-115
I would go Simpson and JPK for durability
Gray v Kennedy v Beams
Quote from: _wato on February 16, 2016, 01:49:36 PM
Gray v Kennedy v Beams
Beams>Gray>JPK
I feel Beams has a better chance of going 110+
I put Gray ahead of JPK as he has a bit less competition,
JPK, Hanners, Mitchell, Jack and Parker should all go 100+ its just a matter of guessing who goes 105+, 110+
Hurn v Malceski
Fyfe + Harwood
vs
JPK + Malceski
Fyfe + Westhoff
v
JPK + Sloane
Quote from: _wato on February 16, 2016, 01:49:36 PM
Gray v Kennedy v Beams
When fit, I would go Beams, but there seems to be some injury concerns around him. Flip a coin for the next two.
Quote from: Gigantor on February 16, 2016, 02:12:43 PM
Quote from: _wato on February 16, 2016, 01:49:36 PM
Gray v Kennedy v Beams
Beams>Gray>JPK
Quote from: MC on February 16, 2016, 05:31:53 PM
Quote from: figjam49i96 on February 16, 2016, 02:29:40 PM
Hurn v Malceski
Hurn imo
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 16, 2016, 06:03:23 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 16, 2016, 04:18:06 PM
Fyfe + Harwood
vs
JPK + Malceski
Fyfe + Harwood
Quote from: Holz on February 16, 2016, 05:16:49 PM
Fyfe + Westhoff
v
JPK + Sloane
Fyfe + Westhoff (very close call)
Quote from: Holz on February 16, 2016, 05:16:49 PM
Fyfe + Westhoff
v
JPK + Sloane
Big Sloane fan so I'd take Option 2
Bennell or Barlow
As far as i know Bennel still hasn't been training with the main group.
Barlow easy!
okay thanks for that guys... what about o'meara or B.crouch
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 16, 2016, 08:57:14 PM
okay thanks for that guys... what about o'meara or B.crouch
Crouch
Also JOM is probably unlikely for round 1 at this stage
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 16, 2016, 08:57:14 PM
okay thanks for that guys... what about o'meara or B.crouch
Crouch ....but possibly both...JOM is a wait and see.
Quote from: Big Mac on February 04, 2016, 08:05:30 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 04, 2016, 07:48:12 PM
Quote from: jeesh on February 04, 2016, 07:29:57 PM
Kade (Blues) Vs Kade (Suns)
KK has more upside. You know what you will get with Simmo but KK could be anywhere from 90 - 100 so i'd back him in.
imo KK could be anywhere from 80-100
Makes Simmo a little more attractive
got to agree. simoo more reliable, kk has both upside and downside risk
yeo v duryea v kk v docherty. goal is as potential keeper d3/4
currently have simmo, bartel, b smith
Hopper vs. Simpkin vs. Andersen.
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 17, 2016, 12:33:47 PM
Hopper vs. Simpkin vs. Andersen.
Hard to say at the moment, would be leaning towards Simpkin and Anderson because of age and experience, Anderson has shown the most so far.
Just saw this on the AFL site
Draftees Jacob Hopper and Matthew Kennedy showed they'll be pushing for a senior spot in round one with strong showings through the middle of the ground
Stringer & Malceski
OR
Buddy & Aish
I know that it seems ridiculous after everything I've stated this preseason, but is it nuts to not start with Goldy?
Thinking of saving $120k and going with Mummy. Gives me 14 keepers.
And Mummy has averaged 113 in the past, with an easy run to start. He has the record of monster scores. He could increase in price, very quickly. Goldy could drop after Nat and Stef. Possibly a trade that requires minimal cash. Is that nuts??
So, Goldy v Mummy + $120k
Quote from: _wato on February 17, 2016, 01:50:45 PM
I know that it seems ridiculous after everything I've stated this preseason, but is it nuts to not start with Goldy?
Thinking of saving $120k and going with Mummy. Gives me 14 keepers.
And Mummy has averaged 113 in the past, with an easy run to start. He has the record of monster scores. He could increase in price, very quickly. Goldy could drop after Nat and Stef. Possibly a trade that requires minimal cash. Is that nuts??
So, Goldy v Mummy + $120k
Chances are you won't have that "minimal cash" just sitting around as you will use it all up with your starting team so you will propably have to use 2 trades. Just stick with him. The mans a god!
Got just under $50k in the bank, with room for more.
Houli or Rance
Nic Nat + Harwood/Aish/Emac
vs
Lobbe + Yeo
Also Harwood vs Aish vs Emac vs Francis (best 200-300k def)
Got 2.
Zork vs Dahl
&
Wells vs Sinclair (with Grimely at R3).
Cheers.
Nicnat & Simpson vs. Lobbe & shaw
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 17, 2016, 05:38:25 PM
Nicnat & Simpson vs. Lobbe & shaw
If Nicnat is fit - the first one.
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 17, 2016, 04:43:12 PM
Nic Nat + Harwood/Aish/Emac
vs
Lobbe + Yeo
Also Harwood vs Aish vs Emac vs Francis (best 200-300k def)
Bump
Nic Nat vs Blicavs vs Mummy
Thanks for your input Jman :D
Quote from: Bubbles on February 17, 2016, 05:56:44 PM
Nic Nat vs Blicavs vs Mummy
Definitely Nic Nat
Mummy is made of glass and Blicavs I expect to drop a few ppg as he moves away from the rucking role
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 17, 2016, 05:54:51 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 17, 2016, 04:43:12 PM
Nic Nat + Harwood/Aish/Emac
vs
Lobbe + Yeo
Also Harwood vs Aish vs Emac vs Francis (best 200-300k def)
Bump
Don't like either too much tbh but would go Lobbe + Yeo
Yeo vs Hurn vs Smith
Quote from: Ricochet on February 17, 2016, 06:34:00 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 17, 2016, 05:54:51 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 17, 2016, 04:43:12 PM
Nic Nat + Harwood/Aish/Emac
vs
Lobbe + Yeo
Also Harwood vs Aish vs Emac vs Francis (best 200-300k def)
Bump
Don't like either too much tbh but would go Lobbe + Yeo
Opposing Rico's view, I'd go Nic Nat + EMac.
Wingard vs Buddy...getting all the Buddy vibes...currently have Wingard
Quote from: HotTiges on February 17, 2016, 07:34:36 PM
Wingard vs Buddy...getting all the Buddy vibes...currently have Wingard
Hard one this one. I have buddy cause I'm tight on funds but if you already had wingard then go with your gut and stick with him.
Sorry for spaming! Have another one though:
Crouch + Harwood/EMAC
vs
Hopper + Smith/Yeo
I reckon Buddy, just
Has a much higher ceiling and doesn't rely on goals to score as much as I think Wingard does
Wingard doesn't miss games though
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 17, 2016, 08:03:14 PM
I reckon Buddy, just
Has a much higher ceiling and doesn't rely on goals to score as much as I think Wingard does
Wingard doesn't miss games though
Seriously considering bud as f4 instead of a rook or mid pricer
EMac + Jed Anderson vs Yeo/Hurn/similar price + forward rookie?
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 17, 2016, 08:26:51 PM
EMac + Jed Anderson vs Yeo/Hurn/similar price + forward rookie?
Yeo + Forward Rookie
Shaw + Forward Rookie
vs
Def Rookie + Forward Premo (Not Dusty, Barlow or Buddy)
Quote from: Gigantor on February 17, 2016, 08:46:27 PM
Shaw + Forward Rookie
vs
Def Rookie + Forward Premo (Not Dusty, Barlow or Buddy)
Lids v Shaw...Lids...I've pondered on this over weeks but have settled on Lids.
Quote from: Gigantor on February 17, 2016, 08:46:27 PM
Shaw + Forward Rookie
vs
Def Rookie + Forward Premo (Not Dusty, Barlow or Buddy)
Shaw + forward rookie for me, particularly if you have Dusty, Barlow and Buddy already. Shaw is a stalwart down back, surrounded by so many unknowns below him and there seems to be more, better rookies in the forward line too.
Never been a fan of the mid-priced players but this is tempting me:
Boyd (D1) + Harwood (D4)
VS
Kolo (D2) + Walker (D4)
KK vs Yeo based on the fact masten is out now
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 18, 2016, 12:18:06 AM
Quote from: Cotch-9 on February 18, 2016, 12:15:15 AM
Quote from: TomK on February 17, 2016, 10:26:55 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 17, 2016, 10:03:16 PM
KK vs Yeo based on the fact masten is out now
Yeo
Yeo
Kolo + cuningham vs Buddy +Byrne
So it's KK vs Buddy? Hard to compare, Buddy I guess
Definitely Buddy
Quote from: eg6914 on February 17, 2016, 09:10:14 PM
Never been a fan of the mid-priced players but this is tempting me:
Boyd (D1) + Harwood (D4)
VS
Kolo (D2) + Walker (D4)
Boyd and Harwood.
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 17, 2016, 10:03:16 PM
KK vs Yeo based on the fact masten is out now
Masten will only miss the first 3-4 games. Yes it's an 8-10 weeker, but we're still a fair way away from the H&A starting. I don't think it's enough to justify picking Yeo over another bloke, you'd have wanted it to have been a coin-flip from the start to get the slight (possible) benefit for the first 3-4 games that might tip Yeo over the edge.
Lids v Zorko?
Weitering v Aish v Hipwood?
Going Zork gets me 2 of the mid defenders
Quote from: reenergised on February 18, 2016, 03:09:24 PM
Lids v Zorko?
Weitering v Aish v Hipwood?
Going Zork gets me 2 of the mid defenders
Zorko and Aish for me
For Draft:
Paparone or Savage?
EMac vs Harwood
Quote from: reenergised on February 18, 2016, 03:09:24 PM
Lids v Zorko?
Weitering v Aish v Hipwood?
Going Zork gets me 2 of the mid defenders
Zorko and Aish. wait and see how aish goes in nab cup though
Quote from: reenergised on February 18, 2016, 03:09:24 PM
Lids v Zorko?
Weitering v Aish v Hipwood?
Going Zork gets me 2 of the mid defenders
Hipwood or Harwood?
Whoever is picked Rd 1 GL
Westhoff vs Wingard
:)
Purely on strong gut hunch, Westhoff by the length of the Flemington straight. ;)
Who's missing ?? ?? Martin, Dahlhaus, Westhoff, Barlow, Franklin, ?? So who do I want to complete this line ?? ???
Lids probably
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 18, 2016, 10:00:55 PM
:)
Purely on strong gut hunch, Westhoff by the length of the Flemington straight. ;)
Who's missing ?? ?? Martin, Dahlhaus, Westhoff, Barlow, Franklin, ?? So who do I want to complete this line ?? ???
Cloke 8)
Quote from: TomK on February 18, 2016, 10:16:07 PM
Lids probably
I want 1 upgrade for this line until the finals. You could be spot on.
Quote from: T Dog on February 18, 2016, 10:19:10 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 18, 2016, 10:00:55 PM
:)
Purely on strong gut hunch, Westhoff by the length of the Flemington straight. ;)
Who's missing ?? ?? Martin, Dahlhaus, Westhoff, Barlow, Franklin, ?? So who do I want to complete this line ?? ???
Cloke 8)
The funny thing about this, is that he is probably capable of making you right. What a terrifying thought !!.. Loved the comment, what are your forward 8 at this stage. That is your serious 8 ;)
Also L Duggan V J Anderson. Am totally stuffed on this one !! :o
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 18, 2016, 10:23:56 PM
Quote from: T Dog on February 18, 2016, 10:19:10 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 18, 2016, 10:00:55 PM
:)
Purely on strong gut hunch, Westhoff by the length of the Flemington straight. ;)
Who's missing ?? ?? Martin, Dahlhaus, Westhoff, Barlow, Franklin, ?? So who do I want to complete this line ?? ???
Cloke 8)
The funny thing about this, is that he is probably capable of making you right. What a terrifying thought !!.. Loved the comment, what are your forward 8 at this stage. That is your serious 8 ;)
Also L Duggan V J Anderson. Am totally stuffed on this one !! :o
Assuming both are playing, Duggan
::)
Just one last one please.
Dangerfield, C Bird, J Anderson V M Barlow, L Franklin, L Duggan ?? ?? ??
I do really fancy the second option but what does everybody else think ?? ;)
Buddy v Stringer?
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 19, 2016, 02:19:07 AM
::)
Just one last one please.
Dangerfield, C Bird, J Anderson V M Barlow, L Franklin, L Duggan ?? ?? ??
I do really fancy the second option but what does everybody else think ?? ;)
2nd
Simpkin and Goldy vs Crouch and Sauce
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 19, 2016, 02:19:07 AM
::)
Just one last one please.
Dangerfield, C Bird, J Anderson V M Barlow, L Franklin, L Duggan ?? ?? ??
I do really fancy the second option but what does everybody else think ?? ;)
2nd
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on February 19, 2016, 07:36:40 AM
Buddy v Stringer?
buddy.
Quote from: Cotch-9 on February 19, 2016, 08:36:47 AM
Simpkin and Goldy vs Crouch and Sauce
Simpkin (75-80) and Goldy (120) vs Crouch (90-95) and Sauce (105-110)
Crouch & Sauce
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 18, 2016, 10:23:56 PML Duggan V J Anderson. Am totally stuffed on this one !! :o
tough choice, personally i'd go Jeddy.
Wingard (F2) vs. Billings (F4 + $72k) vs. Merrett (F4 + $50k) vs. Stringer (F4 + $102k)
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 19, 2016, 12:04:00 PM
Wingard (F2) vs. Billings (F4 + $72k) vs. Merrett (F4 + $50k) vs. Stringer (F4 + $102k)
Like Billings who could just become a top 8 forward this season. Is on the radar but a bit hard to fit in ATM.
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 19, 2016, 12:04:00 PM
Wingard (F2) vs. Billings (F4 + $72k) vs. Merrett (F4 + $50k) vs. Stringer (F4 + $102k)
Merret has a lot of potential to have a really good year. He's in my side over all of them.
Danger and Hoff/Dahl vs Lids and JPK/Gray
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on February 19, 2016, 05:52:13 PMLids and JPK/Gray
Danger @ Geelong is an unknown element.
JPK/Gray should go 110+
Sloane + JPK vs Fyfe + Lachie Hunter
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 19, 2016, 10:55:28 PM
Aish, Birchall and Nic Nat vs Shaw, B.smith and leuy
I'd go first option for that and Sloane & JPK, unless you're a genuine fan of Hunter this year then take a punt on him and Fyfe @fanTCfool
Harley Bennell vs Dayne Zorko
and
Dan Hanneberry vs Matt Priddis vs Dayne Beams
Quote from: IntegralX on February 20, 2016, 03:49:05 AM
Harley Bennell vs Dayne Zorko
and
Dan Hanneberry vs Matt Priddis vs Dayne Beams
Bennell when fit
hannebury
Bird v Simpkin as stepping stones to a f4,
Depends on what your aim is Crows but I would take Simpkin at $129k less with ability to make more cash. Bird may make it more quickly to upgrade though. If going Simpkin depends on how you use the extra $120k.
Fyfe vs Pendles?
Quote from: GraysFan on February 20, 2016, 10:30:13 AM
Fyfe vs Pendles?
(http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/aoz8kgx8pzknypz7z38n.jpg)
Goldy/fyfe/aish vs. Nicnat/jpk/houli
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 20, 2016, 10:53:34 AM
Goldy/fyfe/aish vs. Nicnat/jpk/houli
Slightly prefer the first option, two great captaincy options there.
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 20, 2016, 11:48:43 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 20, 2016, 10:53:34 AM
Goldy/fyfe/aish vs. Nicnat/jpk/houli
Slightly prefer the first option, two great captaincy options there.
yeah 1st one for me also
B.smith vs Birchall
Goldy and Luke McDonald vs NicNat and Brodie Smith.
I have a feeling McDonald could have a big year
Did you have that feeling before the meaningless NAB match? He's not in their best 22 so Naitanui and Smith is the way to go.
Yeo vs Birchall vs Bartel
Shiel v Parker v Adams v Wines
Fyfe + Rampe vs Shaw + Parker
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 20, 2016, 08:12:11 PM
Fyfe + Rampe vs Shaw + Parker
Cheap down back then Parker + Fyfe ;)
Tippett + Deledio + Gray vs Martin + Franklin + Shiel
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 20, 2016, 09:50:30 PM
Tippett + Deledio + Gray vs Martin + Franklin + Shiel
Buddy, Lids, Gray?
:)
ATM I have either L Duggan or C Mills on the midfield pine. Firstly which one plays and secondly which one goes should it become necessary ?? ?? Really struggling on this one. The only other possibility would be to drop either of Wells or Kerridge
Presently have Buddy but really tossing up between he and K Tippett. What do you guys think Buddy or Tippett ?? :'(
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 21, 2016, 02:25:07 AM
:)
ATM I have either L Duggan or C Mills on the midfield pine. Firstly which one plays and secondly which one goes should it become necessary ?? ?? Really struggling on this one. The only other possibility would be to drop either of Wells or Kerridge
Presently have Buddy but really tossing up between he and K Tippett. What do you guys think Buddy or Tippett ?? :'(
Might as well go Mills, looks just as if not more likely than Duggan to line up R1 and is a tad cheaper.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 21, 2016, 02:14:15 AM
Quote from: GoLions on February 21, 2016, 12:48:09 AM
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 20, 2016, 09:50:30 PM
Tippett + Deledio + Gray vs Martin + Franklin + Shiel
Buddy, Lids, Gray?
Definitely this for me too. :)
Martin being Stefan Martin in the rucks, so basically Tippett becoming possible R2 or F4,5,6 with R3
Buddy vs Tippett?
I'm leaning towards Tippett on a hunch he will fire this season and can be a backup ruckman. Buddy I'm wary of, but also worried on missing out on a run of early huge scores.
Gone set and forget rucks in Goldy/Nicnat if that helps.
Quote from: no eye deer on February 21, 2016, 02:36:12 PM
Buddy vs Tippett?
I'm leaning towards Tippett on a hunch he will fire this season and can be a backup ruckman. Buddy I'm wary of, but also worried on missing out on a run of early huge scores.
Gone set and forget rucks in Goldy/Nicnat if that helps.
Tippet - the rucking load will probably be spread evenly between him and Sinclair but I think he'll be the #1 ruck at the Swans this year
What about Wines vs Parker?
Quote from: timtim on February 21, 2016, 04:56:33 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on February 21, 2016, 02:36:12 PM
Buddy vs Tippett?
I'm leaning towards Tippett on a hunch he will fire this season and can be a backup ruckman. Buddy I'm wary of, but also worried on missing out on a run of early huge scores.
Gone set and forget rucks in Goldy/Nicnat if that helps.
Tippet - the rucking load will probably be spread evenly between him and Sinclair but I think he'll be the #1 ruck at the Swans this year
lukey
What about Wines vs Parker?
Quote from: Jackross10 on February 21, 2016, 05:06:00 PM
Quote from: timtim on February 21, 2016, 04:56:33 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on February 21, 2016, 02:36:12 PM
Buddy vs Tippett?
I'm leaning towards Tippett on a hunch he will fire this season and can be a backup ruckman. Buddy I'm wary of, but also worried on missing out on a run of early huge scores.
Gone set and forget rucks in Goldy/Nicnat if that helps.
Tippet - the rucking load will probably be spread evenly between him and Sinclair but I think he'll be the #1 ruck at the Swans this year
lukey
What about Wines vs Parker?
Parker
Fyfe Simpkin Goldy vs KK wingard Sauce?
Parker
Fyfe Simpkin Goldy vs KK wingard Sauce?
[/quote]
Fye, Simpkin & Goldy purely because you are guaranteed 2 players who will be top 2-3 players for their position. None of the players in the second option are guaranteed keepers:
KK could be 80 could be 100
Wingard should be a good option but don't think he'll be top 8 fwds
Sauce no danger for HOTA and means you will have to use 2 trades if you want Goldy in at some stage (which you will)
Quote from: Jackross10 on February 21, 2016, 05:06:00 PM
Quote from: timtim on February 21, 2016, 04:56:33 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on February 21, 2016, 02:36:12 PM
Buddy vs Tippett?
I'm leaning towards Tippett on a hunch he will fire this season and can be a backup ruckman. Buddy I'm wary of, but also worried on missing out on a run of early huge scores.
Gone set and forget rucks in Goldy/Nicnat if that helps.
Tippet - the rucking load will probably be spread evenly between him and Sinclair but I think he'll be the #1 ruck at the Swans this year
lukey
What about Wines vs Parker?
If you like a punt, then Wines. Going to be a star, Ports early draw is awesome and I think this could be his breakout year.
If you want to play safe, Parker has the runs on the board and should only improve.
David Swallow or Jaegar o meara?
Quote from: TexR74 on February 21, 2016, 06:55:36 PM
David Swallow or Jaegar o meara?
J-Bomb IF fit and named rnd 1.
Daisy or Bird
motlop vs mitch robbo
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:45:15 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 10:37:24 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:26:52 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 21, 2016, 10:19:59 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 08:30:19 PM
Daisy or Bird
Avoid BOTH!
nah nah
Tex is right, avoid both
i don't have the money
Still avoid both ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 21, 2016, 10:48:57 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:45:15 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 10:37:24 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:26:52 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 21, 2016, 10:19:59 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 08:30:19 PM
Daisy or Bird
Avoid BOTH!
nah nah
Tex is right, avoid both
i don't have the money
Still avoid both ;)
Ahhhh
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:51:26 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 21, 2016, 10:48:57 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:45:15 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 10:37:24 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:26:52 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 21, 2016, 10:19:59 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 08:30:19 PM
Daisy or Bird
Avoid BOTH!
nah nah
Tex is right, avoid both
i don't have the money
Still avoid both ;)
Ahhhh
I'd say the public verdict has been pretty definitive
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 11:10:21 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:51:26 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 21, 2016, 10:48:57 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:45:15 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 10:37:24 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:26:52 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 21, 2016, 10:19:59 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 08:30:19 PM
Daisy or Bird
Avoid BOTH!
nah nah
Tex is right, avoid both
i don't have the money
Still avoid both ;)
Ahhhh
I'd say the public verdict has been pretty definitive
If you have to pick between the 2 i'd say Daisy. He was alright the other night.
But I agree with the others.
Scott Selwood vs another mid around his price, i think he could be a good POD mid pricer as opposed to O'Meara. He has had two 104+ seasons and Cats are expected to make the leap to Premiership contenders.
Quote from: TexR74 on February 22, 2016, 12:18:53 PM
Scott Selwood vs another mid around his price, i think he could be a good POD mid pricer as opposed to O'Meara. He has had two 104+ seasons and Cats are expected to make the leap to Premiership contenders.
I think we'd all be all over him if he wasn't coming back from ankle surgery and right to go round 1... But that's doubtful
Danger, Birchall and M Brown (WCE) vs Wines, Broadie Smith and Harwood + $30,000
No comparison Danger, Birchall and Brown - 2 players who will be in top 10 v Wines who may get there and Smith who could also push for Top 10. Harwood over Brown does not compensate for the difference in first 2.
Which one do i NOT pick?
Yeo vs Bartel vs KK vs Rampe vs Birchall
Quote from: AaronKirk on February 22, 2016, 01:53:54 AM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 11:10:21 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:51:26 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 21, 2016, 10:48:57 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:45:15 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 10:37:24 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:26:52 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 21, 2016, 10:19:59 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 08:30:19 PM
Daisy or Bird
Avoid BOTH!
nah nah
Tex is right, avoid both
i don't have the money
Still avoid both ;)
Ahhhh
I'd say the public verdict has been pretty definitive
If you have to pick between the 2 i'd say Daisy. He was alright the other night.
But I agree with the others.
who can i get for under $420k then
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 22, 2016, 08:16:29 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on February 22, 2016, 01:53:54 AM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 11:10:21 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:51:26 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 21, 2016, 10:48:57 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:45:15 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 21, 2016, 10:37:24 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 10:26:52 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 21, 2016, 10:19:59 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 21, 2016, 08:30:19 PM
Daisy or Bird
Avoid BOTH!
nah nah
Tex is right, avoid both
i don't have the money
Still avoid both ;)
Ahhhh
I'd say the public verdict has been pretty definitive
If you have to pick between the 2 i'd say Daisy. He was alright the other night.
But I agree with the others.
who can i get for under $420k then
I'd probably prefer to go for either a rookie, or a Wells/Simpkin if you don't have them already (maybe Conca, Anderson, Bennedy?)
Or if you can get a bit more cash, about 25k more is Greene, and upwards from there guys like Billings, Buddy, both Lynch's, Smith, Bell
Quote from: TexR74 on February 22, 2016, 07:47:26 PM
Which one do i NOT pick?
Yeo vs Bartel vs KK vs Rampe vs Birchall
One or two? I wouldn't be that confident in starting Rampe or Yeo myself (although do like Yeo for DT perhaps)
Quote from: TexR74 on February 22, 2016, 07:47:26 PM
Which one do i NOT pick?
Yeo vs Bartel vs KK vs Rampe vs Birchall
Rampe < KK < Yeo < Birchall < Bartel
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on February 22, 2016, 08:22:50 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 22, 2016, 07:47:26 PM
Which one do i NOT pick?
Yeo vs Bartel vs KK vs Rampe vs Birchall
Rampe < KK < Yeo < Birchall < Bartel
Agree, but only just.
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on February 22, 2016, 08:22:50 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 22, 2016, 07:47:26 PM
Which one do i NOT pick?
Yeo vs Bartel vs KK vs Rampe vs Birchall
Rampe < KK < Yeo < Birchall < Bartel
I forget which way the arrows go haha is bartel or rampe first
KK and Birch
Vs
Brodie Smith and Shaw
Quote from: HotTiges on February 22, 2016, 09:55:23 PM
KK and Birch
Vs
Brodie Smith and Shaw
Smith & Shaw easily.
Quote from: Bully on February 22, 2016, 10:00:02 PM
Quote from: HotTiges on February 22, 2016, 09:55:23 PM
KK and Birch
Vs
Brodie Smith and Shaw
Smith & Shaw easily.
Cheers..thinking shaw most likely no.1 DEF Smith possibly top 8? KK maybe top 10 Birch top 15
Quote from: HotTiges on February 22, 2016, 10:03:11 PM
Quote from: Bully on February 22, 2016, 10:00:02 PM
Quote from: HotTiges on February 22, 2016, 09:55:23 PM
KK and Birch
Vs
Brodie Smith and Shaw
Smith & Shaw easily.
Cheers..thinking shaw most likely no.1 DEF Smith possibly top 8? KK maybe top 10 Birch top 15
Shaw is the only sure thing, if Birch has another mid eighties season then he becomes an outlier. KK is another who might just be a pedestrian type. Don't think Smith will crack the ton but he is more than capable of finishing in the 90's, particularly given he will be a midfielder this year.
Quote from: TexR74 on February 22, 2016, 09:20:34 PM
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on February 22, 2016, 08:22:50 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 22, 2016, 07:47:26 PM
Which one do i NOT pick?
Yeo vs Bartel vs KK vs Rampe vs Birchall
Rampe < KK < Yeo < Birchall < Bartel
I forget which way the arrows go haha is bartel or rampe first
Rampe bad, Bartel good. (They're facing the opposite way they usually do on this forum, cus you asked your question backwards)
Priddis v Hanners v Gray v JPK and in which order please
Priddis v Hanners v Gray v JPK and in which order please
All this is subjective as we will no doubt have differing views amongst members/
My order would be Gray who has a huge upside then Priddis - Super consistent with a very little deviation though, and then hard to separate JPK and Hanners as both similar and will finish very close together average wise overall.
Quote from: tommy10 on February 23, 2016, 10:53:07 AM
Priddis v Hanners v Gray v JPK and in which order please
Tough call, they're all so similar!
If I had to:
JPK > Priddis > Gray > Hannebery
- JPK has the ceiling and is decent value I think
- Priddis is just so consistent
- Gray because Port will win quite a bit more
- Hannebery last only because he has only had 1 decent year.
Quote from: tommy10 on February 23, 2016, 10:53:07 AM
Priddis v Hanners v Gray v JPK and in which order please
Gray > Hannebury > Priddis > JPK, but there's nothing in it
Quote from: tommy10 on February 23, 2016, 10:53:07 AM
Priddis v Hanners v Gray v JPK and in which order please
JPK, Gray, Hanners, Priddis
Gray > Hanners > JPK > Priddis
is Pendlebury a must have?
Quote from: tommy10 on February 23, 2016, 10:53:07 AM
Priddis v Hanners v Gray v JPK and in which order please
Gray--- think he'll kill it this year
JPK --- will kick goals and get lots of contested possessions
Priddis ultra consistent but think he may have a slight drop this year
Hanners Just a little behind the others but not a great deal between first and last ;)
:)
J Lonergan V P Seedsman any chance either might become a keeper ?? ::)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 23, 2016, 03:36:05 PM
:)
J Lonergan V P Seedsman any chance either might become a keeper ?? ::)
I wouldn't choose either in the traditional SC format of the game. Seeds averaged 80-odd in his second season and can go big, though a new club might take some getting used to. Lonergan has the potential to step right up with some healthy mid time, perhaps a smokey to bump to 85 or so - though I wouldn't bank on it.
Goldy/Martin V Gawn ...
Does anyone think Gawn has a chance of being a top 2 ruckman?
I saw an article on the AFL website today which has me looking at him as a pod.
Quote from: Money Shot on February 23, 2016, 04:59:05 PM
Goldy/Martin V Gawn ...
Does anyone think Gawn has a chance of being a top 2 ruckman?
I saw an article on the AFL website today which has me looking at him as a pod.
Not even close. Goldy for #1 spot. Stefan/NicNat next 2. And tbh I'm not really looking at anyone else :P
Mummy will score well but probably won't last half the season. Jacobs could go alright, but without Danger HTAs could drop. Sandi will probably be up there, and that's about it for me.
H.Shaw + J.Aish + $25,300 vs K.Simpson + S.Hurn
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 23, 2016, 05:10:06 PM
H.Shaw + J.Aish + $25,300 vs K.Simpson + S.Hurn
Simmo + Hurn, but not so sure on Hurn
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 23, 2016, 05:35:36 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 23, 2016, 05:10:06 PM
H.Shaw + J.Aish + $25,300 vs K.Simpson + S.Hurn
Simmo + Hurn, but not so sure on Hurn
anyone else come into consideration below Hurn?
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 23, 2016, 05:45:20 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 23, 2016, 05:35:36 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 23, 2016, 05:10:06 PM
H.Shaw + J.Aish + $25,300 vs K.Simpson + S.Hurn
Simmo + Hurn, but not so sure on Hurn
anyone else come into consideration below Hurn?
I don't mind the Hurn pick, should score well with Emac back
Based on how much profit they will generate and yearly averages
Hopper vs Polkinghorne
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 23, 2016, 06:36:46 PM
Based on how much profit they will generate and yearly averages
Hopper vs Polkinghorne
Has to be Polkinghorne for now, no one has seen Hopper play at this level
Quote from: Money Shot on February 23, 2016, 04:59:05 PM
Goldy/Martin V Gawn ...
Does anyone think Gawn has a chance of being a top 2 ruckman?
I saw an article on the AFL website today which has me looking at him as a pod.
I'd expect him to finish around ~4th for total points (i.e. slightly better than Jacobs and Sandi, and also assuming Mumford misses games)
Yes he is dominating match simulation at the moment but the Dees simply don't have anyone that can match him in the centre or around the ground
Smith > Birchall thoughts?
Shaw + Aish and Westhoff vs Simpson, Yeo and Greene??
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 24, 2016, 01:48:53 AM
Shaw + Aish and Westhoff vs Simpson, Yeo and Greene??
For me, option 1 hands down,in saying that fully expect everyone else to go option 2. I like Shaw and Westhoff a lot and expect Westy to explode early on.
Which of these defenders makes way for Francis and some much needed cash ?? Lonergan, Aish, Harwood or D Howe
Backline ( going very cheap ) is T McDonald, J Lonergan, R Harwood, J Aish, D Howe, M Brown (ESS) // N Broad,, K Collins
;) Expecting at least 7 of this 8 to line up for Rd 1. Hopefully that's not wishful thinking or the result of a mental wet-dream 8)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 24, 2016, 03:49:38 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 24, 2016, 01:48:53 AM
Shaw + Aish and Westhoff vs Simpson, Yeo and Greene??
For me, option 1 hands down,in saying that fully expect everyone else to go option 2. I like Shaw and Westhoff a lot and expect Westy to explode early on.
Which of these defenders makes way for Francis and some much needed cash ?? Lonergan, Aish, Harwood or D Howe
Backline ( going very cheap ) is T McDonald, J Lonergan, R Harwood, J Aish, D Howe, M Brown (ESS) // N Broad,, K Collins
;) Expecting at least 7 of this 8 to line up for Rd 1. Hopefully that's not wishful thinking or the result of a mental wet-dream 8)
Don't think any of those 4, nor Francis, are best 22.
Quote from: H1bb3i2d on February 24, 2016, 04:02:52 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on February 24, 2016, 03:49:38 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 24, 2016, 01:48:53 AM
Shaw + Aish and Westhoff vs Simpson, Yeo and Greene??
For me, option 1 hands down,in saying that fully expect everyone else to go option 2. I like Shaw and Westhoff a lot and expect Westy to explode early on.
Which of these defenders makes way for Francis and some much needed cash ?? Lonergan, Aish, Harwood or D Howe
Backline ( going very cheap ) is T McDonald, J Lonergan, R Harwood, J Aish, D Howe, M Brown (ESS) // N Broad,, K Collins
;) Expecting at least 7 of this 8 to line up for Rd 1. Hopefully that's not wishful thinking or the result of a mental wet-dream 8)
Don't think any of those 4, nor Francis, are best 22.
Are you referring to Lonergan, Harwood, Aish, and Howe? Harwood is at this point, Lonergan I would've thought would be, but don't think he's a great pick. Howe probably fighting with Lithers, and maybe ahead after last NAB game, but too expensive to make enough cash. And Aish I wouldn't have in Pies 22.
Westhoff vs Wingard?
Quote from: TexR74 on February 25, 2016, 10:21:07 AM
Westhoff vs Wingard?
Hoff is a flat track bully and with a good early draw i reckon will go 100 in the first 8 or so,.
Simpson + Gresham + Mcdonald Tippas/Tucker v Zac Williams + Hopper/Oliver + Milera
Quote from: Holz on February 25, 2016, 10:51:56 AM
Quote from: TexR74 on February 25, 2016, 10:21:07 AM
Westhoff vs Wingard?
Hoff is a flat track bully and with a good early draw i reckon will go 100 in the first 8 or so,.
Simpson + Gresham + Mcdonald Tippas/Tucker v Zac Williams + Hopper/Oliver + Milera
The first option. Premium plus 2 rookies beats speculative keeper plus 2 rookies.
Fyfe + Crouch + Mackenzie v JPK + Z.Williams/Eski + Hopper
Quote from: Holz on February 25, 2016, 03:22:14 PM
Fyfe + Crouch + Mackenzie v JPK + Z.Williams/Eski + Hopper
Option 2, because Williams has a better chance at being a successful def pick than Crouch has of being a mid one I think.
Quote from: MC on February 25, 2016, 03:25:53 PM
Quote from: Holz on February 25, 2016, 03:22:14 PM
Fyfe + Crouch + Mackenzie v JPK + Z.Williams/Eski + Hopper
Option 2, because Williams has a better chance at being a successful def pick than Crouch has of being a mid one I think.
thats what im thinking. Hopper should match or beat mackenzie im thinking.
Fyfe to JPK hurts abit if fyfe explodes.
Quote from: Holz on February 25, 2016, 03:22:14 PM
Fyfe + Crouch + Mackenzie v JPK + Z.Williams/Eski + Hopper
125 + 95 + 70 v 115 + 85 + 70
Sorry I have to say option 1. If Fyfe is fit he is a must have. Also allows you to see who the breakouts for this year are (like TMAC last year) in def instead of starting someone who might be or could go 75 last year and be a complete bust.
Quote from: Hawker_08 on February 25, 2016, 03:53:43 PM
Quote from: Holz on February 25, 2016, 03:22:14 PM
Fyfe + Crouch + Mackenzie v JPK + Z.Williams/Eski + Hopper
125 + 95 + 70 v 115 + 85 + 70
Sorry I have to say option 1. If Fyfe is fit he is a must have. Also allows you to see who the breakouts for this year are (like TMAC last year) in def instead of starting someone who might be or could go 75 last year and be a complete bust.
Williams could be that Tmac though.
88 unsubbed average is pretty appealing.
Do you think crouch can average 95 in the first half of the season though?
I see it as
125 + 80-90 + 65-70 v 115 + 80-90 + 70-75
so
270 - 285 v 265-285
2 keepers in option 2.
Seeing as Goldstein + S.Martin have the same bye.. replace who with who?
Keeping Goldy!
Stefan Martin (same bye as Goldie) + Brodie Smith vs Nic Nat + Yeo
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 25, 2016, 04:23:30 PM
Seeing as Goldstein + S.Martin have the same bye.. replace who with who?
I don't think that them sharing a bye is a huge problem, especially if you have R3 coverage or someone like Grimley forward.
Having said that, looking at your Player v Player, I prefer Nic Nat & Yeo.
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 25, 2016, 04:27:20 PM
Keeping Goldy!
Stefan Martin (same bye as Goldie) + Brodie Smith vs Nic Nat + Yeo
I prefer NN to Martin and prefer Yeo to Smith so this is easy.
Quote from: Holz on February 25, 2016, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 25, 2016, 04:27:20 PM
Keeping Goldy!
Stefan Martin (same bye as Goldie) + Brodie Smith vs Nic Nat + Yeo
I prefer NN to Martin and prefer Yeo to Smith so this is easy.
Same.
Quote from: tommy10 on February 23, 2016, 10:53:07 AM
Priddis v Hanners v Gray v JPK and in which order please
Thanks guys for all your comments. Sorry about the delay inreplying as I've been away for a few days. Have Priddis atm but thinking of JPK/Gray purely becuase of value. JPK does annoy me sometimes as he seems like he's not going near the ball/wanting it as much if you know what I mean. But I guess SC is a marathon not a sprint ;)
Gray looks to have another huge year and has potential to get even better.
Priddis is super consistent and a tackle machine, and Hanners (as you guys stated) has one fantastic year so has to back it up or better last year.
I think I'll go with Gray for now. Have already Pendles, Ablett, Fyfe and Rocky.
Yeah reckon Gray will improve again this year, can see him going 115+.
Greene + Crouch vs Simpkin + Shiel
Current Mids - Fyfe, Gaj, Pendles, Gray, Rocky, Libba
Fwds - Martin, Barlow, Wells
Greene would be F3, Crouch M7
Shield would push Libba to M7
Simpkin would be F4
Quote from: Mantis on February 25, 2016, 10:16:15 PM
Yeah reckon Gray will improve again this year, can see him going 115+.
Greene + Crouch vs Simpkin + Shiel
Current Mids - Fyfe, Gaj, Pendles, Gray, Rocky, Libba
Fwds - Martin, Barlow, Wells
Greene would be F3, Crouch M7
Shield would push Libba to M7
Simpkin would be F4
Assuming that is B Crouch, probably prefer the second option until he proves his fitness
Quote from: Holz on February 25, 2016, 06:21:42 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 25, 2016, 04:27:20 PM
Keeping Goldy!
Stefan Martin (same bye as Goldie) + Brodie Smith vs Nic Nat + Yeo
I prefer NN to Martin and prefer Yeo to Smith so this is easy.
I happen to have Martin and Smith in my team and have hardly touched the other 2.
Heath shaw/ Rory Sloane vs KK or Bartel/Robbie Gray + $113,800
Quote from: Bubbles on February 26, 2016, 10:36:22 AM
Heath shaw/ Rory Sloane vs KK or Bartel/Robbie Gray + $113,800
Bartel and Sloane.
I would say Bartel JPK though
Quote from: Holz on February 26, 2016, 10:57:02 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 26, 2016, 10:36:22 AM
Heath shaw/ Rory Sloane vs KK or Bartel/Robbie Gray + $113,800
Bartel and Sloane.
I would say Bartel JPK though
I have Hanners at M3 already.... And gonna stick with my gut and go with Hanners!
Quote from: Bubbles on February 26, 2016, 11:02:58 AM
Quote from: Holz on February 26, 2016, 10:57:02 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 26, 2016, 10:36:22 AM
Heath shaw/ Rory Sloane vs KK or Bartel/Robbie Gray + $113,800
Bartel and Sloane.
I would say Bartel JPK though
I have Hanners at M3 already.... And gonna stick with my gut and go with Hanners!
no reason you cant go hanner jpk, they always socre well in the same team
Williams Buddy v Simpson Bird
Quote from: Holz on February 26, 2016, 12:29:15 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 26, 2016, 11:02:58 AM
Quote from: Holz on February 26, 2016, 10:57:02 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 26, 2016, 10:36:22 AM
Heath shaw/ Rory Sloane vs KK or Bartel/Robbie Gray + $113,800
Bartel and Sloane.
I would say Bartel JPK though
I have Hanners at M3 already.... And gonna stick with my gut and go with Hanners!
no reason you cant go hanner jpk, they always socre well in the same team
Williams Buddy v Simpson Bird
You're clearly a fan of Williams, and I don't so much rate Bird, so back in Option 1
Houli Sloane Wells
Vs
DEF-Rookie Fyfe Dahlhaus
Vs
B.Smith/KK Fyfe Wells
Quote from: Marstar on February 27, 2016, 12:48:20 AM
Houli Sloane Wells
Vs
DEF-Rookie Fyfe Dahlhaus
Vs
B.Smith/KK Fyfe Wells
Like the 3rd option
Pendles and Eski vs Sidebottom and BSmith
Franklin V Billings
Quote from: Fid on February 27, 2016, 07:24:52 AM
Franklin V Billings
I'd be outnumbered on this but Billings if I was starting one.
Buddy..
1.Blicavs-Gawn or 2.Goldy-Lobbe... Think between the 2 options they will arrive close but who would you go... 1 or 2 ??
Quote from: Mark on February 27, 2016, 08:28:41 AM
Buddy..
1.Blicavs-Gawn or 2.Goldy-Lobbe... Think between the 2 options they will arrive close but who would you go... 1 or 2 ??
If you think that they'll go close you might as well go Option 2 for the captaincy option in Goldy
Quote from: Mark on February 27, 2016, 08:28:41 AM
Buddy..
1.Blicavs-Gawn or 2.Goldy-Lobbe... Think between the 2 options they will arrive close but who would you go... 1 or 2 ??
Durability: option 2. For set and forget potential: option 1.
I think Goldy is a must have by years end so the Blic and Gawn combo might end up costing you a trade just like option 2 probably will (to upgrade Lobbe)
Yeah I think both options will need an upgrade at some point.
But option 1 could potentially make more points.. As those 2 should score well.
Option 2 we know Goldy will kill it but what will Lobbe do ?
Mmmm a hard one..
Assuming all named R1
Zac Williams & Fyfe
V
Rance & Wines
Rance-Wines I like.. Think Rance will go really well again and Wines could do anything..
I'm currently stuck on Wines v Ducan ??
Quote from: enzedder on February 27, 2016, 12:24:02 PM
Assuming all named R1
Zac Williams & Fyfe
V
Rance & Wines
Im doing Williams and Fyfe. As my team just doesnt look right without fyfe
B. Crouch + D. Menzel + 50k vs M. Robbo + 117k Rookie
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 27, 2016, 02:00:47 PM
B. Crouch + D. Menzel + 50k vs M. Robbo + 117k Rookie
Do you have Wells at all. If so Robbo and Rookie but if not 1.
Interesting one Mumford/Nat + Pickett v Lobbe + Daniel Menzell + $44k
Not really sold on Lobbe but Mezeell if he stays fit could be a good pick up. Also currently have Wells so are Menzell and Wells too much a risk.
Dahlhous V Stringer
Wines & Kommer vs Mills & Stringer
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on February 27, 2016, 05:25:15 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 27, 2016, 05:23:24 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 27, 2016, 04:28:17 PM
Dahlhous V Stringer
Dahl
Dahl for points, but saving $120k and potentially having Stringer go BOOM is tempting...
I'm thinking very hard about Stringer also...
Currently have Dahl also but a downgrade and $$$ would be good.
Will Dahl have another big year ?? Hmmm
Who do people think would be the best pick out of these guys?
JPK v Sidebottom v Shiel v Treloar v Gaff v Bont v Parker
Looking to bring one of them for last midfield spot have Fyfe, Danger, Hanners, Rocky and Libba already
Im liking Sidebottom at the moment
Quote from: Bubbles on February 27, 2016, 08:45:26 PM
Who do people think would be the best pick out of these guys?
JPK v Sidebottom v Shiel v Treloar v Gaff v Bont v Parker
Looking to bring one of them for last midfield spot have Fyfe, Danger, Hanners, Rocky and Libba already
Im liking Sidebottom at the moment
Where's the Rory option?
Quote from: Bubbles on February 27, 2016, 08:45:26 PM
Who do people think would be the best pick out of these guys?
JPK v Sidebottom v Shiel v Treloar v Gaff v Bont v Parker
Looking to bring one of them for last midfield spot have Fyfe, Danger, Hanners, Rocky and Libba already
Im liking Sidebottom at the moment
None, find the cash and get GAJ :)
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 27, 2016, 09:24:01 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 27, 2016, 08:45:26 PM
Who do people think would be the best pick out of these guys?
JPK v Sidebottom v Shiel v Treloar v Gaff v Bont v Parker
Looking to bring one of them for last midfield spot have Fyfe, Danger, Hanners, Rocky and Libba already
Im liking Sidebottom at the moment
Where's the Rory option?
That Ablett fella goes alright
Quote from: GoLions on February 27, 2016, 09:27:21 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 27, 2016, 09:24:01 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on February 27, 2016, 08:45:26 PM
Who do people think would be the best pick out of these guys?
JPK v Sidebottom v Shiel v Treloar v Gaff v Bont v Parker
Looking to bring one of them for last midfield spot have Fyfe, Danger, Hanners, Rocky and Libba already
Im liking Sidebottom at the moment
Where's the Rory option?
That Ablett fella goes alright
Can't dispute that, didn't notice his absence
JPK & Birchall vs Parker & Houli
Quote from: tommy10 on February 27, 2016, 10:06:21 PM
JPK & Birchall vs Parker & Houli
Tough choice indeed, Houli is in very good form and never misses matches, I think he'll be in the top echelon again. The thing that really concerns me with Birch is the graph is headed south, 94, 92, 89, 86, he's also starting to become an injury liability. Parker vs JPK, I'd pick JPK but I think Parker is a value bet just the same. So it's Parker & Houli for me by a whisker.
Quote from: tommy10 on February 27, 2016, 10:06:21 PM
JPK & Birchall vs Parker & Houli
2nd option. Can you afford jpk/houli??
Sam Gray vs. Stringer as my F4
Rank these blokes
De Goey v D Menzel v Wells v Simpkin
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on February 27, 2016, 05:50:38 PM
Wines & Kommer vs Mills & Stringer
Wines and Kommer, although I'd still try and squeeze Mills in if possible
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 27, 2016, 11:24:25 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on February 27, 2016, 10:06:21 PM
JPK & Birchall vs Parker & Houli
2nd option. Can you afford jpk/houli??
Sam Gray vs. Stringer as my F4
I dunno, I wouldn't wanna pick either tbh haha. Maybe Gray? How much do they cost each? May be other options.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on February 27, 2016, 11:40:20 PM
Rank these blokes
De Goey v D Menzel v Wells v Simpkin
Gee that's tough.
At this stage I'd say:
Wells > De Goey > Simpkin > Menzel
Sidebum & Rance vs Pendles & Suckling
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on February 27, 2016, 11:40:20 PM
Rank these blokes
De Goey v D Menzel v Wells v Simpkin
Wells, Simpkin, De Goey, Menzel for me
But I was all over De Goey last year and if he continues this nab form...
Quote from: Bully on February 27, 2016, 10:21:19 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on February 27, 2016, 10:06:21 PM
JPK & Birchall vs Parker & Houli
Tough choice indeed, Houli is in very good form and never misses matches, I think he'll be in the top echelon again. The thing that really concerns me with Birch is the graph is headed south, 94, 92, 89, 86, he's also starting to become an injury liability. Parker vs JPK, I'd pick JPK but I think Parker is a value bet just the same. So it's Parker & Houli for me by a whisker.
Thanks Bully was leaning towards this too.
Will try and get JPK and Houli but something's gotta give...will keep trying
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 27, 2016, 11:24:25 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on February 27, 2016, 10:06:21 PM
JPK & Birchall vs Parker & Houli
2nd option. Can you afford jpk/houli??
Sam Gray vs. Stringer as my F4
Stringer just...looks to have an even better year!
Sidebum & Rance vs Pendles & Suckling
[/quote]
1st option for me. Sidebum is at a bargain price and may try and fit him in and Rance is quality. Two good premos.
prob been done before..
KK vs Bartel vs Laird vs Birch for a spot @ D3
Best D2/3/4 for $505,000 and under..
I have Shaw, Bartel and Yeo
Go another Premium or get a Mackenzie type cost and pocket the Cash?
Quote from: HotTiges on February 28, 2016, 01:38:48 AM
prob been done before..
KK vs Bartel vs Laird vs Birch for a spot @ D3
Bartel consistently over the years has the runs on the board.
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 28, 2016, 01:55:08 AM
Best D2/3/4 for $505,000 and under..
I have Shaw, Bartel and Yeo
Go another Premium or get a Mackenzie type cost and pocket the Cash?
Another premo. Simpson fits nicely.
Simo + Gray v B.Smith + Fyfe?
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 28, 2016, 02:36:23 AM
Simo + Gray v B.Smith + Fyfe?
Can you find a way to do Simpson and Fyfe?
Gray V Duncan
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2016, 07:43:29 AM
Gray V Duncan
Robbie or Sam?? if Robbie then Gray by a F**KING country mile.
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 28, 2016, 09:07:08 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2016, 07:43:29 AM
Gray V Duncan
Robbie or Sam?? if Robbie then Gray by a F**KING country mile.
Robbie ... Was just wondering if the extra money would be worth while
Would allow me to go Kommer to Menzel
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2016, 09:40:28 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 28, 2016, 09:07:08 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2016, 07:43:29 AM
Gray V Duncan
Robbie or Sam?? if Robbie then Gray by a F**KING country mile.
Robbie ... Was just wondering if the extra money would be worth while
Would allow me to go Kommer to Menzel
no do't do that. Gray by a mile.
Fyfe V Danger V Gray
Put them in order :)
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2016, 09:40:28 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on February 28, 2016, 09:07:08 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2016, 07:43:29 AM
Gray V Duncan
Robbie or Sam?? if Robbie then Gray by a F**KING country mile.
Robbie ... Was just wondering if the extra money would be worth while
Would allow me to go Kommer to Menzel
Gray (+110) + Kommer (55) vs. Duncan (+95) + menzel (+75)
points wise pretty similar but at least with option 1 you get a keeper in Gray
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2016, 10:22:49 AM
Fyfe V Danger V Gray
Put them in order :)
in that order
Quote from: Money Shot on February 28, 2016, 10:22:49 AM
Fyfe V Danger V Gray
Put them in order :)
You already have them in order
Quote from: mattttwillll on February 28, 2016, 01:55:08 AM
Best D2/3/4 for $505,000 and under..
I have Shaw, Bartel and Yeo
Go another Premium or get a Mackenzie type cost and pocket the Cash?
Simmo the obvious one. But if you can fit Laird in that's also a good option too if you can find an extra couple of $$
Birchall + Wines vs Suckling + R.Gray
Quote from: auscoyote on February 28, 2016, 12:24:23 PM
Birchall + Wines vs Suckling + R.Gray
Birchall and wines easy, but I think birchall my be overrated, prefer options like Rampe, yeo, Bartel and KK
Scott Selwood/Brendon Ah Chee & Aaron Hall vs Jack Viney & Jed Anderson/Liam Duggan
Pick one and choose one of the alternatives :)
Z Williams v Brodie Smith v J Lonergan
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 28, 2016, 02:23:14 PM
Z Williams v Brodie Smith v J Lonergan
For the sake of my Draft team ... I hope it's :
J.L > Z.W > BS :P
and not the other way around :'(
Roberton VS KKolo (or anyone under 510K, already have Birch)
Quote from: eg6914 on February 28, 2016, 04:20:51 PM
Roberton VS KKolo (or anyone under 510K, already have Birch)
KKolo.
Z. Williams & Z. Merrett V Dahlhaus & Harwood
Quote from: eg6914 on February 28, 2016, 04:20:51 PM
Roberton VS KKolo (or anyone under 510K, already have Birch)
Considered Brucey Laird??
Quote from: figjam49i96 on February 28, 2016, 07:07:41 PM
Quote from: eg6914 on February 28, 2016, 04:20:51 PM
Roberton VS KKolo (or anyone under 510K, already have Birch)
KKolo.
Z. Williams & Z. Merrett V Dahlhaus & Harwood
Option 1 looks great value..want to see Harwood morr
Parker and Dahlhaus vs danger and Hall??
Quote from: Spotted gum on February 28, 2016, 10:00:18 PM
Parker and Dahlhaus vs danger and Hall??
Gotta go Option A
NN vs Gawn, gawn said he's had a big preseason and ready to be elite for his position
Quote from: supercoachhelp on February 28, 2016, 10:20:33 PM
NN vs Gawn, gawn said he's had a big preseason and ready to be elite for his position
Gawn
Z.Merret or S.Gray ???( both Mid-Fwd) nearly same price
Quote from: tommy10 on February 27, 2016, 01:11:56 AM
Quote from: Marstar on February 27, 2016, 12:48:20 AM
Houli Sloane Wells
Vs
DEF-Rookie Fyfe Dahlhaus
Vs
B.Smith/KK Fyfe Wells
Like the 3rd option
Pendles and Eski vs Sidebottom and BSmith
sorry no good options that include eski.
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 28, 2016, 02:23:14 PM
Z Williams v Brodie Smith v J Lonergan
Brodie Smith Lonergan williams ;)
Quote from: Mark on February 28, 2016, 10:40:19 PMZ.Merret or S.Gray ???( both Mid-Fwd) nearly same price
Zach for me, currently my F4 and could potentially change Boomer to Sam Gray. Just worried about his role with a full side. Keen to hear others thoughts on this.
Laird vs Simpson
Laird & Wells vs Rich & De Goey
Quote from: TexR74 on February 29, 2016, 10:46:05 AM
Laird & Wells vs Rich & De Goey
Laird and Wells but I like the Rich pick
Rance, Simpson, Roberton, KKolo
What order?
Dangerfield and Gawn
Vs
Wines and goldy
Quote from: steven3 on February 29, 2016, 12:57:34 PM
Rance, Simpson, Roberton, KKolo
What order?
Rance, Simmo and then KK/Roberton
Quote from: eaglesman on February 29, 2016, 02:02:04 PM
Dangerfield and Gawn
Vs
Wines and goldy
Can you do someone better than Wines mate? Think Goldy is a must but personally not sold on Wines
Viney or Wines?
Wines + Simpkin vs Zaka + Daisy
Goldy is finally back in.
But want your thoughts.
Birchall + Simpkin + Mummy v Smith + Goldy + Menadue
Rance v Simpson also
Quote from: _wato on February 29, 2016, 04:29:30 PM
Goldy is finally back in.
But want your thoughts.
Birchall + Simpkin + Mummy v Smith + Goldy + Menadue
Quote from: _wato on February 29, 2016, 04:31:31 PM
Rance v Simpson also
Tough but I'd go Simpson
Ess, S.Michael vs S.Grimley for R3 who makes/scores more ? I see them as similar scorers
Duryea vs Williams vs Sheridan vs Lonergan
What order do you put them in?
Quote from: nostradamus on February 29, 2016, 02:31:18 PM
Wines + Simpkin vs Zaka + Daisy
Wines > Zaha
Simpkin > Daisy
Quote from: hawkboy80 on February 29, 2016, 06:21:54 PM
Ess, S.Michael vs S.Grimley for R3 who makes/scores more ? I see them as similar scorers
Would pick Grimley due to DPP
Quote from: MC on February 29, 2016, 06:29:46 PM
Duryea vs Williams vs Sheridan vs Lonergan
What order do you put them in?
Sheridan, Williams, Lonergan, Duryea maybe? Sheridan is probably the only one I'd start though.
Quote from: GoLions on February 29, 2016, 06:43:01 PM
Quote from: MC on February 29, 2016, 06:29:46 PM
Duryea vs Williams vs Sheridan vs Lonergan
What order do you put them in?
Sheridan, Williams, Lonergan, Duryea maybe? Sheridan is probably the only one I'd start though.
If Williams is named for R1 I'd be tempted to take the punt on him
Quote from: fanTCfool on February 29, 2016, 07:49:15 PM
Quote from: GoLions on February 29, 2016, 06:43:01 PM
Quote from: MC on February 29, 2016, 06:29:46 PM
Duryea vs Williams vs Sheridan vs Lonergan
What order do you put them in?
Sheridan, Williams, Lonergan, Duryea maybe? Sheridan is probably the only one I'd start though.
If Williams is named for R1 I'd be tempted to take the punt on him
I'm not confident he'd be in the best 22 all season, otherwise I'd be tempted to start him as well. And Duryea is at that price where he absolutely has to be a keeper, and I don't see that happening (this year).
Viney vs Wines
Quote from: wceagles on February 29, 2016, 10:06:20 PM
Viney vs Wines
If pre-season form is anything to go by, Jack gets the nod here for me.
who has the better JS, Harwood vs Howe (hawk)
Quote from: frenzy on February 29, 2016, 11:02:04 PM
who has the better JS, Harwood vs Howe (hawk)
Harwood atm
Quote from: MC on February 29, 2016, 06:29:46 PM
Duryea vs Williams vs Sheridan vs Lonergan
What order do you put them in?
Can i add Savage to that list?
Houli and Yeo vs Simpson and Birchall
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 01, 2016, 06:14:15 AM
Houli and Yeo vs Simpson and Birchall
Simpson and Birchall
Overpriced Houli and Unproven Yeo, vs Proven Simpson and Proven Birchall.
Quote from: LordSneeze on March 01, 2016, 11:52:00 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 01, 2016, 06:14:15 AM
Houli and Yeo vs Simpson and Birchall
Simpson and Birchall
Overpriced Houli and Unproven Yeo, vs Proven Simpson and Proven Birchall.
Stringer vs Hall
Quote from: LordSneeze on March 01, 2016, 11:52:00 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 01, 2016, 06:14:15 AM
Houli and Yeo vs Simpson and Birchall
Simpson and Birchall
Overpriced Houli and Unproven Yeo, vs Proven Simpson and Proven Birchall.
I think Houli is ready to explode this year imo and Yeo will improve from last year. I think Birchall will average btn 90-95. Loss of Suckling could attract more of a tag. Not much separating the pairs though, but if you're looking for PODs the 1st option is the way to go.
Yeo and Sheridan v Shaw/Boyd and Weitering
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 01, 2016, 06:03:15 PM
Yeo and Sheridan v Shaw/Boyd and Weitering
Tough - Shaw and Weitering just. Boyd will be rested a bit.
Z Williams, Hartley and Z Merrett
Vs
Gibson, Weitering and Menzel?
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Quote from: Swoozie on March 01, 2016, 07:28:06 PM
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Easily. Jelwood is underdone and Goldy is Goldy.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 01, 2016, 06:03:15 PM
Yeo and Sheridan v Shaw/Boyd and Weitering
Shaw and Weitering...I've got both...Yeo made way for Weitering and upgraded Simpkin to Zerrett
Quote from: Swoozie on March 01, 2016, 07:28:06 PM
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Goldy/Crouch...I have both.
Quote from: js19 on March 01, 2016, 06:30:42 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 01, 2016, 06:03:15 PM
Yeo and Sheridan v Shaw/Boyd and Weitering
Tough - Shaw and Weitering just. Boyd will be rested a bit.
Z Williams, Hartley and Z Merrett
Vs
Gibson, Weitering and Menzel?
Z.Williams, Hartley and Zerrett...look better to me tan Gibbo and Menzel
Sheridan vs Aish
Quote from: Ricochet on March 01, 2016, 07:33:53 PM
Quote from: Swoozie on March 01, 2016, 07:28:06 PM
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Easily. Jelwood is underdone and Goldy is Goldy.
Interesting that 100% of people have Ablett yet won't go near Selwood due to being underdone. I think Selwood will be a massive POD, particularly if he doesn't feature in the preseason. Both players are phenomenal in their preparation, I'm very tempted to pick him this year, as I have done for the past 7 years.
Fwd/Mid choice
Anderson v Wells v De Goey ??
On talent alone I would go Wells, but at 31 with 10 games in 2014 and 2 last year I have doubts on his body
Quote from: Fid on March 01, 2016, 08:28:02 PM
Fwd/Mid choice
Anderson v Wells v De Goey ??
On talent alone I would go Wells, but at 31 with 10 games in 2014 and 2 last year I have doubts on his body
I would go wells but de goey is set to have a big year
Quote from: Bully on March 01, 2016, 08:05:28 PM
Interesting that 100% of people have Ablett yet won't go near Selwood due to being underdone. I think Selwood will be a massive POD, particularly if he doesn't feature in the preseason. Both players are phenomenal in their preparation, I'm very tempted to pick him this year, as I have done for the past 7 years.
Gazza has avg 133.2 since 2008-2014, now he's priced @ 115, that's an 18 point difference. He's a bargain.
Jelwood since 2009-2014 has avg 116.13 and is priced at 105. Yes he's a bargain too but you can always get Selwood cheaper by Rnd 8-10. I've explained it all here (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,105343.msg1713765.html#msg1713765)
Quote from: Fid on March 01, 2016, 08:28:02 PM
Fwd/Mid choice
Anderson v Wells v De Goey ??
On talent alone I would go Wells, but at 31 with 10 games in 2014 and 2 last year I have doubts on his body
Tough give em all another game. But I like Wells/De Goey
Quote from: Ricochet on March 01, 2016, 07:33:53 PM
Quote from: Swoozie on March 01, 2016, 07:28:06 PM
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Easily. Jelwood is underdone and Goldy is Goldy.
This
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 01, 2016, 08:40:54 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 01, 2016, 08:05:28 PM
Interesting that 100% of people have Ablett yet won't go near Selwood due to being underdone. I think Selwood will be a massive POD, particularly if he doesn't feature in the preseason. Both players are phenomenal in their preparation, I'm very tempted to pick him this year, as I have done for the past 7 years.
Gazza has avg 133.2 since 2008-2014, now he's priced @ 115, that's an 18 point difference. He's a bargain.
Jelwood since 2009-2014 has avg 116.13 and is priced at 105. Yes he's a bargain too but you can always get Selwood cheaper by Rnd 8-10. I've explained it all here (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,105343.msg1713765.html#msg1713765)
Quote from: Fid on March 01, 2016, 08:28:02 PM
Fwd/Mid choice
Anderson v Wells v De Goey ??
On talent alone I would go Wells, but at 31 with 10 games in 2014 and 2 last year I have doubts on his body
Tough give em all another game. But I like Wells/De Goey
Quote from: Ricochet on March 01, 2016, 07:33:53 PM
Quote from: Swoozie on March 01, 2016, 07:28:06 PM
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Easily. Jelwood is underdone and Goldy is Goldy.
This
Why not both? Banking on Selwood's exact bottoming out is fraught with danger, I would rather just lock him now and not have to wait for the 500k bargain.
Priddis v JPK v R. Gray
Quote from: Bully on March 01, 2016, 08:59:23 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 01, 2016, 08:40:54 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 01, 2016, 08:05:28 PM
Interesting that 100% of people have Ablett yet won't go near Selwood due to being underdone. I think Selwood will be a massive POD, particularly if he doesn't feature in the preseason. Both players are phenomenal in their preparation, I'm very tempted to pick him this year, as I have done for the past 7 years.
Gazza has avg 133.2 since 2008-2014, now he's priced @ 115, that's an 18 point difference. He's a bargain.
Jelwood since 2009-2014 has avg 116.13 and is priced at 105. Yes he's a bargain too but you can always get Selwood cheaper by Rnd 8-10. I've explained it all here (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,105343.msg1713765.html#msg1713765)
Quote from: Fid on March 01, 2016, 08:28:02 PM
Fwd/Mid choice
Anderson v Wells v De Goey ??
On talent alone I would go Wells, but at 31 with 10 games in 2014 and 2 last year I have doubts on his body
Tough give em all another game. But I like Wells/De Goey
Quote from: Ricochet on March 01, 2016, 07:33:53 PM
Quote from: Swoozie on March 01, 2016, 07:28:06 PM
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Easily. Jelwood is underdone and Goldy is Goldy.
This
Why not both? Banking on Selwood's exact bottoming out is fraught with danger, I would rather just lock him now and not have to wait for the 500k bargain.
This guy
Backline and mid combo
J Pittard, Sheridan (d2,3) and Dangerfield
Vs
Bartel, B Smith or Johanasen (d2,3) and Wines (m5)
Had the bottom combo for ages changing Smith and Johanasen backwards and forwards, but just changed my team and structure yesterday resulting in having the top combo.
As It stands, currently have 1 player from each team in my squad. Havent started with that before.
Quote from: GoLions on March 01, 2016, 09:10:05 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 01, 2016, 08:59:23 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 01, 2016, 08:40:54 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 01, 2016, 08:05:28 PM
Interesting that 100% of people have Ablett yet won't go near Selwood due to being underdone. I think Selwood will be a massive POD, particularly if he doesn't feature in the preseason. Both players are phenomenal in their preparation, I'm very tempted to pick him this year, as I have done for the past 7 years.
Gazza has avg 133.2 since 2008-2014, now he's priced @ 115, that's an 18 point difference. He's a bargain.
Jelwood since 2009-2014 has avg 116.13 and is priced at 105. Yes he's a bargain too but you can always get Selwood cheaper by Rnd 8-10. I've explained it all here (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,105343.msg1713765.html#msg1713765)
Quote from: Fid on March 01, 2016, 08:28:02 PM
Fwd/Mid choice
Anderson v Wells v De Goey ??
On talent alone I would go Wells, but at 31 with 10 games in 2014 and 2 last year I have doubts on his body
Tough give em all another game. But I like Wells/De Goey
Quote from: Ricochet on March 01, 2016, 07:33:53 PM
Quote from: Swoozie on March 01, 2016, 07:28:06 PM
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Easily. Jelwood is underdone and Goldy is Goldy.
This
Why not both? Banking on Selwood's exact bottoming out is fraught with danger, I would rather just lock him now and not have to wait for the 500k bargain.
This guy
With so many expensive rookies looking likely I may have to settle on Selwood, I have Ben Kennedy, Milera, Menadue and possibly even Mills & Weitering in the pipeline, something has to give.
Ward v Sloane v Selwood v Parker + $30k
Wines + Crouch
vs
Danger + Mills/Simpkin
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 01, 2016, 11:12:12 PM
Wines + Crouch
vs
Danger + Mills/Simpkin
Danger and Simpkin (although I'd try having both Mills and Simpkin at this stage)
Quote from: _wato on March 01, 2016, 10:57:15 PM
Ward v Sloane v Selwood v Parker + $30k
Hmmm tough one...maybe Parker?
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 01, 2016, 11:12:12 PM
Wines + Crouch
vs
Danger + Mills/Simpkin
I've got Wines & Crouch....not considering the other option at all.
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 01, 2016, 11:12:12 PM
Wines + Crouch
vs
Danger + Mills/Simpkin
Danger + Simpkin
Goldy Sipmkin Shaw
Tippet Dahl Rampe/Yeo
Would start tippet at R2 and swing him forward when ready to bring Goldy in
Quote from: Bully on March 01, 2016, 08:05:28 PM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 01, 2016, 07:33:53 PM
Quote from: Swoozie on March 01, 2016, 07:28:06 PM
Gawn/Selwood
or
Goldy/Crouch
Easily. Jelwood is underdone and Goldy is Goldy.
Interesting that 100% of people have Ablett yet won't go near Selwood due to being underdone. I think Selwood will be a massive POD, particularly if he doesn't feature in the preseason. Both players are phenomenal in their preparation, I'm very tempted to pick him this year, as I have done for the past 7 years.
Difference is their preseason. GAJ's setback is minor and looks to play a NAB game... Jelwood has had his issue since before Xmas and may not even be ready for RD1
Pendles + B.Smith vs L.Parker + Simpson?
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 02, 2016, 12:22:25 PM
Pendles + B.Smith vs L.Parker + Simpson?
Pendles + Smith. Pendles is a must have.
Mathieson v Macpherson
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 02, 2016, 12:47:45 PM
Mathieson v Macpherson
Whoever is named - Both may not even make the cut for Lions or Suns. This is the danger of trying to lock in rookies before we Round 1 teams. we should get an idea in NAB 3 when most teams will be playing their strongest side.
Birchall + Mcdonald tippa/byrne (basically D8 besides Brown Hartley Collins/Broad)
v
Seedsman + Harwood.
these guys would be D3 D4 with weits at D5.
Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 01:28:43 PM
Birchall + Mcdonald tippa/byrne (basically D8 besides Brown Hartley Collins/Broad)
v
Seedsman + Harwood.
these guys would be D3 D4 with weits at D5.
You're collecting Midpricers like Pokemon :P
Gun and Rookie for me, to make up the core strategy and 2-3 midpricers from that gut feeling.
Houli, Laird and Acres vs Simpson, Birchall and Crouch
Quote from: NickyBoy on March 02, 2016, 02:26:30 PM
Houli, Laird and Acres vs Simpson, Birchall and Crouch
Simpson, Birchall and Crouch, But i'd swap one of those out for Laird if you could find the cash
Quote from: Marstar on March 02, 2016, 01:51:29 PM
Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 01:28:43 PM
Birchall + Mcdonald tippa/byrne (basically D8 besides Brown Hartley Collins/Broad)
v
Seedsman + Harwood.
these guys would be D3 D4 with weits at D5.
You're collecting Midpricers like Pokemon :P
Gun and Rookie for me, to make up the core strategy and 2-3 midpricers from that gut feeling.
I turned it into Seedsman + Mackenzie + JPK v Birchall + Sub 120k back + Sloane
Seedsman would be my only mid pricer bar Libba crouch.
does that change your opinion?
Seedsman 75
MacKenzie 70
JPK 115
v
Birch 85
Sloane 110
Rookie 65
Exactly the same point output, and two keepers in the second option. Greater reward with the first option but the safety of option 2 does it for me mate.
Danger and Pendles or drop one for JPK to free up some cash?
Mids: Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Ablett, Rockliff, Libba, M. Crouch...rooks
Quote from: _wato on March 02, 2016, 03:36:32 PM
Seedsman 75
MacKenzie 70
JPK 115
v
Birch 85
Sloane 110
Rookie 65
Exactly the same point output, and two keepers in the second option. Greater reward with the first option but the safety of option 2 does it for me mate.
do you think 65 is abit ambitious for a back rookie who is D8?
I was looking more 50-55.
I had it
Seeds 80
JPk 115
Mackenzie 70
Birch 90
Sloane 110
Rookie 55
:-\
Z Williams v T Sheridan. This one has me totally stuffed ::)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 02, 2016, 03:58:30 PM
:-\
Z Williams v T Sheridan. This one has me totally stuffed ::)
Sheridan is best 22, not sure about Williams...
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 02, 2016, 03:59:57 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 02, 2016, 03:58:30 PM
:-\
Z Williams v T Sheridan. This one has me totally stuffed ::)
Sheridan is best 22, not sure about Williams...
Thanks mate. :)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 02, 2016, 04:07:58 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 02, 2016, 03:59:57 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 02, 2016, 03:58:30 PM
:-\
Z Williams v T Sheridan. This one has me totally stuffed ::)
Sheridan is best 22, not sure about Williams...
Thanks mate. :)
Williams has shown he scores well when he plays.
Sheridan has shown it depends with his first half terrible.
Quote from: Holz on March 02, 2016, 04:15:48 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 02, 2016, 04:07:58 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 02, 2016, 03:59:57 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 02, 2016, 03:58:30 PM
:-\
Z Williams v T Sheridan. This one has me totally stuffed ::)
Sheridan is best 22, not sure about Williams...
Thanks mate. :)
Williams has shown he scores well when he plays.
Sheridan has shown it depends with his first half terrible.
Look like going Rance, Laird, B Smith, Z Williams, T Sheridan, EMac. // Broard, M Brown (Ess) until the conclusion of the NAB. Had to lose Gray and Westhoff to enable this to happen and still not completely sold on this yet.
Opinions on Brad to Matt? I don't think I can start Brad now with his injury concerns and Matt is looking good in NAB.
Ward v Selwood v S.Mitchell v Parker v Viney
Quote from: wceagles on March 02, 2016, 04:51:46 PM
Ward v Selwood v S.Mitchell v Parker v Viney
Selwood
Shaw (D1), Yeo (D3) and NicNat (R2)
v
Rance (D1), Houli (D2) and Stef Martin (R2)
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 02, 2016, 06:27:34 PM
Shaw (D1), Yeo (D3) and NicNat (R2)
v
Rance (D1), Houli (D2) and Stef Martin (R2)
Option 2 for me. I'm not sold on the Yeo Wagon
Weiters vs EMack
Weitering, K.Collins, JPK, Menadue vs Harwood, Emack, B.Crouch, J.Anderson.
i know it seems clear but i need to get rid of crouch
Goldy Sipmkin Shaw
Tippet Dahl Rampe/Yeo
Would start tippet at R2 and swing him forward when ready to bring Goldy in
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 02, 2016, 06:27:34 PM
Shaw (D1), Yeo (D3) and NicNat (R2)
v
Rance (D1), Houli (D2) and Stef Martin (R2)
Option 2 for me
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 02, 2016, 07:29:51 PM
Weiters vs EMack
Not too sure tbh...see how Weitering goes next NAB game
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 02, 2016, 07:37:28 PM
Weitering, K.Collins, JPK, Menadue vs Harwood, Emack, B.Crouch, J.Anderson.
i know it seems clear but i need to get rid of crouch
How much cash do you have if you bring in Harwood and Menadue? Depending on team structure, something like: Harwood, DEF premo, MID rookie, Menadue
Quote from: Cotch-9 on March 02, 2016, 07:44:17 PM
Goldy Sipmkin Shaw
Tippet Dahl Rampe/Yeo
Would start tippet at R2 and swing him forward when ready to bring Goldy in
Goldy/Simpkin/Shaw by a long long way
M Brown (west coast) & Dangerfield vs Shaw & Freeman (STK)
Quote from: TexR74 on March 03, 2016, 11:26:59 AM
M Brown (west coast) & Dangerfield vs Shaw & Freeman (STK)
Brown and Danger easily. Not sure Freeman will even be ready for RD1?
Quote from: js19 on March 01, 2016, 06:30:42 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 01, 2016, 06:03:15 PM
Yeo and Sheridan v Shaw/Boyd and Weitering
Tough - Shaw and Weitering just. Boyd will be rested a bit.
Z Williams, Hartley and Z Merrett
Vs
Gibson, Weitering and Menzel?
Williams, Hartley and Zerret. Zerret will be extra mid and onball time and has potential to be 105+ for a forward. Hartley job security and opportunity should see him scoring well and generating more cash than Weitering. Williams v Gibson is a toss up
Let's try again... Pendles and Dangerfield or turn one into JPK to save some cash...thinking Pendles goes?
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 03, 2016, 12:05:36 PM
Let's try again... Pendles and Dangerfield or turn one into JPK to save some cash...thinking Pendles goes?
What would you do with the extra cash? If just holding it, I'd prefer to just lock in Pendles and Danger
Quote from: GoLions on March 03, 2016, 12:15:36 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 03, 2016, 12:05:36 PM
Let's try again... Pendles and Dangerfield or turn one into JPK to save some cash...thinking Pendles goes?
What would you do with the extra cash? If just holding it, I'd prefer to just lock in Pendles and Danger
You're right about the cash, just a contingency plan in case I need some cash prior to round one. JPK could be underpriced, and I guess you see Pendles and Danger both averaging more than JPK.
Heath Shaw, Callum Mills and Max Gawn vs Eric Mackenzie, Luke Parker and Stefan Martin
could drop Martin back to Gawn resulting in Parker going to any of Kennedy, Sloane, Selwood, Priddis or Beams
will Shaw maintain his average? can Mackenzie keep a 70 average for a quick upgrade and will Gawn be elite?
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 03, 2016, 07:45:20 PM
Heath Shaw, Callum Mills and Max Gawn vs Eric Mackenzie, Luke Parker and Stefan Martin
could drop Martin back to Gawn resulting in Parker going to any of Kennedy, Sloane, Selwood, Priddis or Beams
will Shaw maintain his average? can Mackenzie keep a 70 average for a quick upgrade and will Gawn be elite?
If you go with Stefan and Mills, how much cash left for a DEF premo?
Quote from: GoLions on March 03, 2016, 07:49:42 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 03, 2016, 07:45:20 PM
Heath Shaw, Callum Mills and Max Gawn vs Eric Mackenzie, Luke Parker and Stefan Martin
could drop Martin back to Gawn resulting in Parker going to any of Kennedy, Sloane, Selwood, Priddis or Beams
will Shaw maintain his average? can Mackenzie keep a 70 average for a quick upgrade and will Gawn be elite?
If you go with Stefan and Mills, how much cash left for a DEF premo?
$579,400 with a backline of R.Laird, K.Kolo, E.Yeo, and then Brown, Hartley, Hibberd, Collins rookie priced
Z Merrett vs. Robbo vs. Stringer as my F3
Menadue vs Corey Ellis at F6 / bench?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 02, 2016, 06:27:34 PM
Shaw (D1), Yeo (D3) and NicNat (R2)
v
Rance (D1), Houli (D2) and Stef Martin (R2)
Option 2
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 03, 2016, 07:55:43 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 03, 2016, 07:49:42 PM
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 03, 2016, 07:45:20 PM
Heath Shaw, Callum Mills and Max Gawn vs Eric Mackenzie, Luke Parker and Stefan Martin
could drop Martin back to Gawn resulting in Parker going to any of Kennedy, Sloane, Selwood, Priddis or Beams
will Shaw maintain his average? can Mackenzie keep a 70 average for a quick upgrade and will Gawn be elite?
If you go with Stefan and Mills, how much cash left for a DEF premo?
$579,400 with a backline of R.Laird, K.Kolo, E.Yeo, and then Brown, Hartley, Hibberd, Collins rookie priced
Ummm not sure haha, could bring in Simmo or Bartel?
Harwood + M. Crouch vs Any Def Below 523k + Fwd Rookie.
And if you could throw up a name for the Defender, not Birch, Simmo or Bartel, that would be much appreciated
Quote from: fanTCfool on March 03, 2016, 10:49:17 PM
Harwood + M. Crouch vs Any Def Below 523k + Fwd Rookie.
And if you could throw up a name for the Defender, not Birch, Simmo or Bartel, that would be much appreciated
Think I'd be leaning towards the backline premium and a forward rookie.
The first 3 I would pick in that price range are Birchall, Simpson and Bartel haha, but after that I'd look at Rance or Houli
Could also add Laird to that list with Rance and Houli.
Quote from: Ringo on March 03, 2016, 11:14:41 PM
Could also add Laird to that list with Rance and Houli.
They've been the three I'm tossing up between, also considering Hurn after further positive signs tonight. 101.
Harwood, Wines v Birch, crouch
Rance + Sheridan vs Bartel + Hurn?
Mills + Parish and Menzel vs Two Rookie Mids (currently have Kerridge, Cuningham, Mathieson and Macpherson) and Any forward of roughly $430,000?
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 04, 2016, 10:39:58 AM
Rance + Sheridan vs Bartel + Hurn?
Bartel Hurn by a heap
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 04, 2016, 10:43:28 AM
Mills + Parish and Menzel vs Two Rookie Mids (currently have Kerridge, Cuningham, Mathieson and Macpherson) and Any forward of roughly $430,000?
Probably need to wait until after NAB 3 for this one and see what rookies will line up RD1
Wells + S. Gray or Deledio and rookie?
Westhoff vs Z Merrett
Westhoff nice early draw as well.
Quote from: cortez on March 04, 2016, 01:17:48 PM
Wells + S. Gray or Deledio and rookie?
Don't like the Gray pick, but also think you need to start Wells.
Can you do something like Wells and Buddy/Hoff/Barlow/Zorko/etc?
Quote from: Ringo on March 04, 2016, 02:47:26 PM
Westhoff nice early draw as well.
How about Westhoff vs Wingard?
Heater and Parker vs Houli and Gray
Quote from: tommy10 on March 04, 2016, 11:06:25 PM
Heater and Parker vs Houli and Gray
Heater and Parker
Heater will comfortably outscore Houli but Parker is a chance to match Gray
ward v jpk
Robbo V The Hoff ??
Quote from: dosstheboss on March 05, 2016, 11:38:21 AM
Robbo V The Hoff ??
Both are good picks, don't see that much of a difference between them myself. If Dixon doesn't play round 1, maybe Robbo.
Prem Def. & Weitering
OR
Z. Williams & Hurn
I can afford any prem defender (already have Shaw)
Quote from: billnats on March 05, 2016, 12:27:31 PM
Prem Def. & Weitering
OR
Z. Williams & Hurn
I can afford any prem defender (already have Shaw)
Option 1 for me. Another keeper plus Weits should play all season and make cash
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 05, 2016, 12:32:25 PM
Quote from: billnats on March 05, 2016, 12:27:31 PM
Prem Def. & Weitering
OR
Z. Williams & Hurn
I can afford any prem defender (already have Shaw)
Option 1 for me. Another keeper plus Weits should play all season and make cash
Which premium defender would you go for since I have Shaw already? No one jumping out at me...
- McVeigh injury worries
- Laird; consistency?
- KK; can he make the jump up to a real prem status?
Quote from: billnats on March 05, 2016, 12:39:26 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 05, 2016, 12:32:25 PM
Quote from: billnats on March 05, 2016, 12:27:31 PM
Prem Def. & Weitering
OR
Z. Williams & Hurn
I can afford any prem defender (already have Shaw)
Option 1 for me. Another keeper plus Weits should play all season and make cash
Which premium defender would you go for since I have Shaw already? No one jumping out at me...
- McVeigh injury worries
- Laird; consistency?
- KK; can he make the jump up to a real prem status?
Laird mate!
Goldstein + Sheridan + 150k rookie (Menadue?) vs. Gawn + Weitering + Greene?
Sidearse v Parker v Ward?
Currently got Parker, but the other two are tempting.
Quote from: BomberSam on March 05, 2016, 12:56:26 PM
Goldstein + Sheridan + 150k rookie (Menadue?) vs. Gawn + Weitering + Greene?
Im going with Option B myself...
but I also have Goldstein and Menadue so who am I to judge :o
Quote from: Nige on March 05, 2016, 12:59:35 PM
Sidearse v Parker v Ward?
Currently got Parker, but the other two are tempting.
I've got Parker as a lock in my team
Quote from: billnats on March 05, 2016, 01:06:24 PM
Quote from: Nige on March 05, 2016, 12:59:35 PM
Sidearse v Parker v Ward?
Currently got Parker, but the other two are tempting.
I've got Parker as a lock in my team
I really wanted him, then I did a bit of investigating into how Sidey and Ward have fared and Ward looks the best option (also the most expensive though!)... however I've landed up with Danger in the end. 8)
Quote from: Nige on March 05, 2016, 12:59:35 PM
Sidearse v Parker v Ward?
Currently got Parker, but the other two are tempting.
Yeh Parker would be my pick
Lonergan v Rampe V Sheridan as my d3
Quote from: wceagles on March 05, 2016, 01:16:25 PM
Lonergan v Rampe V Sheridan as my d3
Sheridan for me mate!
Quote from: wceagles on March 05, 2016, 01:16:25 PM
Lonergan v Rampe V Sheridan as my d3
I've gone for Lonergan. Midfield place there for him
Quote from: wceagles on March 05, 2016, 01:16:25 PM
Lonergan v Rampe V Sheridan as my d3
Quote from: BomberSam on March 05, 2016, 01:18:30 PM
Quote from: wceagles on March 05, 2016, 01:16:25 PM
Lonergan v Rampe V Sheridan as my d3
Sheridan for me mate!
Quote from: billnats on March 05, 2016, 01:25:00 PM
Quote from: wceagles on March 05, 2016, 01:16:25 PM
Lonergan v Rampe V Sheridan as my d3
I've gone for Lonergan. Midfield place there for him
Quote from: TomK on March 05, 2016, 01:25:35 PM
Quote from: wceagles on March 05, 2016, 01:16:25 PM
Lonergan v Rampe V Sheridan as my d3
Lonergan
(http://tse1.mm.bing.net/th?id=OIP.M84c54d7014bfdb5f94c44bccf9a76b11o2&w=196&h=147&c=7&rs=1&qlt=90&o=4&pid=1.1)
Shaw and Weitering
v
Sheridan and Lonergan
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 05, 2016, 02:58:36 PM
Shaw and Weitering
v
Sheridan and Lonergan
probably top option.
Shaw and Zerrett
Vs
Gibson and Danger?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 05, 2016, 02:58:36 PM
Shaw and Weitering
v
Sheridan and Lonergan
I'll do the top one but I also have Lonergan as well.
Quote from: billnats on March 05, 2016, 06:24:47 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 05, 2016, 02:58:36 PM
Shaw and Weitering
v
Sheridan and Lonergan
I'll do the top one but I also have Lonergan as well.
LOL im starting all 4. but if I had to choose I'd go option 2, both guys priced at 64 and I really do think that both guys can go 85 and maybe slightly more.
dahl and sinclair
vs
goldy and wells
Bartel and Stef Martin
V
Laird and NicNat
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 05, 2016, 11:32:20 PM
Bartel and Stef Martin
V
Laird and NicNat
Option 2, but I'd look to get Bartel in too
McGovern, Weitering and Danger
v
Bartel, Dea and Pendles
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 05, 2016, 11:41:09 PM
McGovern, Weitering and Danger
v
Bartel, Dea and Pendles
option 2
Deledio and Seedsman
v
Shaw and Steele
Quote from: cptawesom3 on March 06, 2016, 12:14:21 AM
Deledio and Seedsman
v
Shaw and Steele
I wouldn't want Steele nor Seedsman
Mills (M7)/Simpkin(F4) vs B Crouch/B Kennedy?
This will give me the 5 Mid Guns, plus Libba and Crouch, but my Fwds are looking decidedly shaky with just Dusty, Barlow and Wells at F3.
Quote from: no eye deer on March 06, 2016, 10:22:54 AM
Mills (M7)/Simpkin(F4) vs B Crouch/B Kennedy?
This will give me the 5 Mid Guns, plus Libba and Crouch, but my Fwds are looking decidedly shaky with just Dusty, Barlow and Wells at F3.
I have gone for the second option at the moment
Will revisit this after Crouch plays/doesn't play next week though
Danger (M2) + Kennedy (F6) vs. Crouch (M5) + Stringer (F4)
I think Stringer & Crouch can improve by 15+ & make $75k+ each.
Who's the better option for points and cash generation
Danger/ Kennedy. Danger will be one of the top 5 scorers and Kennedy will make enough to be a great stepping stone
Laird vs Kk?
Rance v Houli v Laird v Simmo
Goldy+def rookie
Vs
Cal Sinclair + Sheridan
Quote from: IntegralX on March 06, 2016, 01:02:43 PM
Goldy+def rookie
Vs
Cal Sinclair + Sheridan
Depends on rookie - I assume u already have Brown and Hartley?
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 10:54:39 AM
Danger (M2) + Kennedy (F6) vs. Crouch (M5) + Stringer (F4)
I think Stringer & Crouch can improve by 15+ & make $75k+ each.
Who's the better option for points and cash generation
depends if crouch plays but if you go option one just upgrade to stringer later
Parker (M5) and M Crouch (M7)
v
Danger (M2) and Mills (M7) + $50k
Gawn vs Nic Nat
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 06, 2016, 01:18:50 PM
Gawn vs Nic Nat
I'm currently rolling with NicNat but I have to say Gawn is tempting me
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 06, 2016, 01:09:16 PM
Quote from: IntegralX on March 06, 2016, 01:02:43 PM
Goldy+def rookie
Vs
Cal Sinclair + Sheridan
Depends on rookie - I assume u already have Brown and Hartley?
Correct. It'd be Tucker/Broad/similar. McD-tip in fwd, already got hibberd.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 06, 2016, 01:17:23 PM
Parker (M5) and M Crouch (M7)
v
Danger (M2) and Mills (M7) + $50k
Danger and Mills
Quote from: IntegralX on March 06, 2016, 01:22:01 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 06, 2016, 01:09:16 PM
Quote from: IntegralX on March 06, 2016, 01:02:43 PM
Goldy+def rookie
Vs
Cal Sinclair + Sheridan
Depends on rookie - I assume u already have Brown and Hartley?
Correct. It'd be Tucker/Broad/similar. McD-tip in fwd, already got hibberd.
Hard to see which def rookies will play and score wel. Maybe Collins? Either way if try to get Goldy in and find a bit more cash maybe for a Dea or Weiters? Or ideally gran b Sheridan and Goldy
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 06, 2016, 01:13:24 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 10:54:39 AM
Danger (M2) + Kennedy (F6) vs. Crouch (M5) + Stringer (F4)
I think Stringer & Crouch can improve by 15+ & make $75k+ each.
Who's the better option for points and cash generation
depends if crouch plays but if you go option one just upgrade to stringer later
You've don't reckon Matt Crouch will get a game??
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 01:42:13 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 06, 2016, 01:13:24 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 10:54:39 AM
Danger (M2) + Kennedy (F6) vs. Crouch (M5) + Stringer (F4)
I think Stringer & Crouch can improve by 15+ & make $75k+ each.
Who's the better option for points and cash generation
depends if crouch plays but if you go option one just upgrade to stringer later
You've don't reckon Matt Crouch will get a game??
I found that a bit odd too - M Crouch will play no question
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 06, 2016, 01:58:35 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 01:42:13 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 06, 2016, 01:13:24 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 10:54:39 AM
Danger (M2) + Kennedy (F6) vs. Crouch (M5) + Stringer (F4)
I think Stringer & Crouch can improve by 15+ & make $75k+ each.
Who's the better option for points and cash generation
depends if crouch plays but if you go option one just upgrade to stringer later
You've don't reckon Matt Crouch will get a game??
I found that a bit odd too - M Crouch will play no question
Probably thought it was Brad and the question marks over his fitness, although both will play r1.
Andrew Swallow vs Ryan Griffen
Dangerfield vs Goldtein
So
Callum sinclair and Danger
Vs
Goldy, and M Crouch
De Goey v M Crouch
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 06, 2016, 05:04:31 PM
De Goey v M Crouch
Crouch. But will have a watch and see how De Goey goes again
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 05:24:05 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 06, 2016, 05:04:31 PM
De Goey v M Crouch
Crouch. But will have a watch and see how De Goey goes again
Agree - but to get Crouch I need to downgrade Mills to Milera.
Crouch and Milera
v
De Goey and Mills?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 06, 2016, 05:52:41 PM
Crouch and Milera
v
De Goey and Mills?
Crouch and Milera just.
Just
Wines vs Viney
Quote from: TomK on March 06, 2016, 02:02:23 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 06, 2016, 01:58:35 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 01:42:13 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 06, 2016, 01:13:24 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 06, 2016, 10:54:39 AM
Danger (M2) + Kennedy (F6) vs. Crouch (M5) + Stringer (F4)
I think Stringer & Crouch can improve by 15+ & make $75k+ each.
Who's the better option for points and cash generation
depends if crouch plays but if you go option one just upgrade to stringer later
You've don't reckon Matt Crouch will get a game??
I found that a bit odd too - M Crouch will play no question
Probably thought it was Brad and the question marks over his fitness, although both will play r1.
i'm hoping brad is fit
montagna ( pricey) v dahl (pricey) v Robinson v Zerret V Wingard
This order:
montagna ( pricey) > dahl (pricey) > Wingard > Robinson > Zerret
May already have been done but i have a couple.
EMac vs Weitering
Parker vs Ward vs Shiel vs R.Gray.
Danger vs Fyfe
Quote from: dmac07 on March 07, 2016, 01:59:48 PM
May already have been done but i have a couple.
EMac vs Weitering
Parker vs Ward vs Shiel vs R.Gray.
Danger vs Fyfe
Not easy this one Dmac
Weitering is $20k cheaper so if needing cash go that way but Emack has the higher upside, Toss the coin.
Gray, Parker, Ward and Shiel in that order.
Fyfe just over Danger mainly due to the fact Danger still unknown at Geelong but showing good signs.
Heath Shaw and Jeremy McGovern v Rance and Laird/Simpson
Quote from: Ringo on March 07, 2016, 02:27:21 PM
Heath Shaw and Jeremy McGovern v Rance and Laird/Simpson
If you are confident McG goes 90+ then A.
Rance a bit too KPP for me and should be cheaper at some point (I'm backing Houli with Ramadan covering the bye). Don't think Simpson will be top6 and would rather use him a trustworthy upgrade target after the bye. Laird is a good POD.
Quote from: Ringo on March 07, 2016, 02:27:21 PM
Heath Shaw and Jeremy McGovern v Rance and Laird/Simpson
Laird and Simmo?
Quote from: dmac07 on March 07, 2016, 01:59:48 PM
May already have been done but i have a couple.
EMac vs Weitering
Parker vs Ward vs Shiel vs R.Gray.
Danger vs Fyfe
gee that ones tough!!
you will have to wait for the last NAB game on the first one, i guess if Weit gets over 80 then you pick him
All 4 of those are much of a muchness but i would go Parker, racks them up (they all do) and is cheaper iirc
Fyfe/Danger, pick the player you enjoy watching the most if you don't need the saving you get with Danger.
I guess you have to wait to see what rookies need selecting in the mids... if non pop up and you feel you need another 200k mid rookie then you might need to think about going Weit/Parker/Danger to generate that 80k needed
good luck
Danger vs Pendles
Mullett vs Weitering
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 07, 2016, 03:59:27 PM
Danger vs Pendles
Pendles.
But you could easily have both. I do.
Danger + Menadue vs. Viney + Crouch
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 08, 2016, 12:05:53 AM
Danger + Menadue vs. Viney + Crouch
Danger and Menadue
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 08, 2016, 12:05:53 AM
Danger + Menadue vs. Viney + Crouch
Danger & Menadue, Viney hasn't proven anything and Crouch is a stepping stone.
Robinson + M.Crouch + Simpson
vs
Parker + Mills + Shaw
Bottom option means 2 Premo Forward line with Wells at F3.
Quote from: TomK on March 08, 2016, 02:10:08 AM
Robinson + M.Crouch + Simpson
vs
Parker + Mills + Shaw
Bottom option means 2 Premo Forward line with Wells at F3.
Parker + Mills + Shaw
Rampe Vs Hurn?
Parish V Mills?
Thanks in advance
Quote from: Ricochet on March 08, 2016, 12:46:58 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on March 07, 2016, 11:31:21 PM
Quote from: Big Mac on March 07, 2016, 10:47:21 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 07, 2016, 10:33:00 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 07, 2016, 03:59:27 PM
Danger vs Pendles
Pendles.
But you could easily have both. I do.
i got fyfe pendles gaj rocky so i don't have the cash ahah
Crouch & Aish/Harwood
vs
Buddy & Rookie (Probably Collins/Adams of WB)
Neither of the top two will be keepers but could hold there own until being stepped up
Buddy will be a keeper but who knows how the rook will score
Simpson + Pendles V Bartel + Danger
Hey guys,
Just want to get your thoughts on which players to select from the following:
B Kennedy vs J Simpkin
De Goey vs Wells
M Duncan vs Parker
Lobbe vs Z Smith
Any thoughts appreciated
BenKen
Wells
Parker
Neither
Also, there's a Player X v Player Y thread for these types of questions mate. Take a look.
http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,105273.1005.html
Quote from: mzunguman on March 08, 2016, 11:32:38 AM
Simpson + Pendles V Bartel + Danger
Bartel Danger.
Pendles better value than Danger, but should score similar. Bartel a better pick than Simpson
Bennedy
De Goey more likely to be a keeper
Parker
Smitty
Quote from: mzunguman on March 08, 2016, 11:32:38 AM
Simpson + Pendles V Bartel + Danger
Bartel and Danger, narrowly.
Parish vs. Mills
Sheridan vs. Lonergan
Shiel vs. Parker
Quote from: BomberSam on March 08, 2016, 12:13:46 PM
Parish vs. Mills
Sheridan vs. Lonergan
Shiel vs. Parker
Mills, Lonergan, Parker
Quote from: TomK on March 08, 2016, 12:26:54 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 08, 2016, 12:13:46 PM
Parish vs. Mills
Sheridan vs. Lonergan
Shiel vs. Parker
Mills, Lonergan, Parker
Agree, Agree, then 50/50. Shiel very decent also, so i think you could go either way tbh
can afford any defender except shaw... already got barrel and laird.. soo
Boyd vs McVeigh vs Simpson vs Rance vs houli
Quote from: rocky38 on March 08, 2016, 03:26:26 PM
can afford any defender except shaw... already got barrel and laird.. soo
Boyd vs McVeigh vs Simpson vs Rance vs houli
id say save your coin and take a risk on a midpricer lol
Quote from: lucky on March 08, 2016, 03:30:09 PM
Quote from: rocky38 on March 08, 2016, 03:26:26 PM
can afford any defender except shaw... already got barrel and laird.. soo
Boyd vs McVeigh vs Simpson vs Rance vs houli
id say save your coin and take a risk on a midpricer lol
???
Get Simmo!
Quote from: rocky38 on March 08, 2016, 03:26:26 PM
can afford any defender except shaw... already got barrel and laird.. soo
Boyd vs McVeigh vs Simpson vs Rance vs houli
Simpson.
Quote from: mzunguman on March 08, 2016, 11:32:38 AM
Simpson + Pendles V Bartel + Danger
Bartel + Pendles?
Harwood vs Weitering
Quote from: fanTCfool on March 08, 2016, 09:05:46 PM
Quote from: Mahogany on March 08, 2016, 08:45:39 PM
Harwood vs Weitering
I'd go both if possible
Not for me... I probably won't be shelling out on 2 MID rooks > $200K, let alone in DEF.
Pick 1 if you must. Others will present themselves by round 1, always happens. Don't stress, just wait.
Weitering vs Aish
Quote from: timtim on March 08, 2016, 11:41:36 PM
Weitering vs Aish
Weitering.
Personally have not considered Aish once and I don't see why he is so popular. Is he best 22? What will his role be.
Even though he has not played a senior game you have a fair idea what Weitering's role will be. He will likely play as the 3rd tall defender and is best 22.
Agree with everything AK said
No idea why people are rating Aish. At his price I'd rather Weits or Emack as cheaper options or even someone like T McKenzie for a little more
Tom Sheridon vs. E Yeo ??
Quote from: Sicko on March 09, 2016, 01:04:00 PM
Tom Sheridon vs. E Yeo ??
I'm only just leaning towards sheriden due to price, but I wouldn't discount Yeo from having a big year, has a high ceiling and has been playing with the mids in NAB, has just failed to score. Yeo's a high risk high reward guy I think.
Quote from: dmac07 on March 09, 2016, 02:11:35 PM
Quote from: Sicko on March 09, 2016, 01:04:00 PM
Tom Sheridon vs. E Yeo ??
Sheridan, more upside
Yeah I'm leading towards sheridan too because of the price, but I reckon yeo is a gun and I've now got a new dilemma..
Yeo vs Bartel ??
Quote from: Sicko on March 09, 2016, 02:49:26 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 09, 2016, 02:11:35 PM
Quote from: Sicko on March 09, 2016, 01:04:00 PM
Tom Sheridon vs. E Yeo ??
Sheridan, more upside
Yeah I'm leading towards sheridan too because of the price, but I reckon yeo is a gun and I've now got a new dilemma..
Yeo vs Bartel ??
Bartel if you can handle the odd missed game here and there.
Quote from: Sicko on March 09, 2016, 02:49:26 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 09, 2016, 02:11:35 PM
Quote from: Sicko on March 09, 2016, 01:04:00 PM
Tom Sheridon vs. E Yeo ??
Sheridan, more upside
Yeah I'm leading towards sheridan too because of the price, but I reckon yeo is a gun and I've now got a new dilemma..
Yeo vs Bartel ??
Bartel for me. Not a fan of Yeo
Harwood vs Weitering vs Emac for D4
Harwood i think has better scoring potential.
Chances are it has been discussed but hey its a long thread..
Hall vs Greene F3
Quote from: pendles93 on March 09, 2016, 03:54:43 PM
Chances are it has been discussed but hey its a long thread..
Hall vs Greene F3
I would go with Greene but certainly reason enough so far to pick Hall, just personally I'm not convinced he won't burn people.
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 09, 2016, 04:03:14 PM
Quote from: pendles93 on March 09, 2016, 03:54:43 PM
Chances are it has been discussed but hey its a long thread..
Hall vs Greene F3
I would go with Greene but certainly reason enough so far to pick Hall, just personally I'm not convinced he won't burn people.
I think both guys could burn people, both or not in the midfield at full strength, but with injuries they are...I'm considering both as well...
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 09, 2016, 05:10:38 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 09, 2016, 04:03:14 PM
Quote from: pendles93 on March 09, 2016, 03:54:43 PM
Chances are it has been discussed but hey its a long thread..
Hall vs Greene F3
I would go with Greene but certainly reason enough so far to pick Hall, just personally I'm not convinced he won't burn people.
I think both guys could burn people, both or not in the midfield at full strength, but with injuries they are...I'm considering both as well...
Yeah agree but Greene has been knocking on the door for a couple of years, whereas Hall has been succeeding while all the big guys were out, as soon as one or two are back could be a totally different ball game... Greene more likely to do it imo
Mills, Oliver, Simpkin, Gresham, Polkinghorne, Davis... Assuming all are named round 1, which ONE do I not take? :P
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 09, 2016, 08:15:28 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 09, 2016, 05:10:38 PM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 09, 2016, 04:03:14 PM
Quote from: pendles93 on March 09, 2016, 03:54:43 PM
Chances are it has been discussed but hey its a long thread..
Hall vs Greene F3
I would go with Greene but certainly reason enough so far to pick Hall, just personally I'm not convinced he won't burn people.
I think both guys could burn people, both or not in the midfield at full strength, but with injuries they are...I'm considering both as well...
Yeah agree but Greene has been knocking on the door for a couple of years, whereas Hall has been succeeding while all the big guys were out, as soon as one or two are back could be a totally different ball game... Greene more likely to do it imo
Mills, Oliver, Simpkin, Gresham, Polkinghorne, Davis... Assuming all are named round 1, which ONE do I not take? :P
Simpkin and pocket the change.
pendles v Danger (cant go both atm)
Quote from: almonds on March 09, 2016, 10:10:03 PM
pendles v Danger (cant go both atm)
It's a hard one, because It's so calming to have Pendles scoring for you week in, week out, when everything else is up and down, but I really think Danger is going to have the season of his career, so if I drop one it will be Pendles. Trying to keep both though.
Im sure this may have been done before but I'm not able to locate it but: Could you order the following expensive rookies.
Oliver v Parish v Mills v Mcaffer
Quote from: lucky on March 10, 2016, 12:10:16 AM
Im sure this may have been done before but I'm not able to locate it but: Could you order the following expensive rookies.
Oliver v Parish v Mills v Mcaffer
Mills/Oliver, Parish, Macaffer
Weitering, Crouch, Mills, Parish vs Broad, Parker, Polkinghorne, Matheison
Aish V Harwood at D4
Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2016, 12:23:54 AM
Weitering, Crouch, Mills, Parish vs Broad, Parker, Polkinghorne, Matheison
If Crouch seems like he's ok for round 1, then the first option
Quote from: dosstheboss on March 10, 2016, 01:22:32 AM
Aish V Harwood at D4
Harwood, as I'm a lot more confident in him being best 22 than Aish
Better to go 4 premo forwards (Martin. Westhoff. Barlow. Greene) also including wells. And a 3 premo defence.
Or visa versa with a 4 premo backline in shaw. Laird. Bartel. And someone around 400-500k
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 10, 2016, 02:34:13 AM
Better to go 4 premo forwards (Martin. Westhoff. Barlow. Greene) also including wells. And a 3 premo defence.
Or visa versa with a 4 premo backline in shaw. Laird. Bartel. And someone around 400-500k
Depends on rookies round 1, if there is enough rookies playing in each position i would go 4 premo forwards
Fyfe vs Danger and Priddis vs Hannebery
Quote from: steven3 on March 10, 2016, 03:04:20 PM
Fyfe vs Danger and Priddis vs Hannebery
Definitely Hanners for me on the second pairing, and probably Danger though less clear cut. For the record I have Fyfe and Danger, and strongly considered Hanners.
GROUP A ... - Kommer, - S.Martin, - Ward, - Mc Tippa approx 65+100+105+60 = 330
vs this
GROUP B ... - DeGoey, - Goldy, - Polk, - Aish approx 80+115+60+75 = 330
I had group B but have made the change to group A which gives me 1 extra keeper, points are only my estimate and $ diff is only 15k, what do ppl think,
My midfield is heavily stacked so it wouldn't hurt my side to go back to my original group B & have 1 more rookie
Quote from: steven3 on March 10, 2016, 03:04:20 PM
Fyfe vs Danger and Priddis vs Hannebery
Fyfe + Hanners
Greene v Zorks v Zerret v Robinson
Quote from: almonds on March 10, 2016, 05:58:36 PM
Greene v Zorks v Zerret v Robinson
Robbo > Zorko > Zerrett > Greene
Goldy and Crouch vs Z Smith and Ablett
Thinking option 1...
Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2016, 07:24:18 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 10, 2016, 05:58:36 PM
Greene v Zorks v Zerret v Robinson
Robbo > Zorko > Zerrett > Greene
Goldy and Crouch vs Z Smith and Ablett
Thinking option 1...
Well goldy could go 120 again and crouch i'm assuming its brad may go 90 vs Smith who has shown potential in the nab to go anywhere between 85-95 and ablett to go 125 probs
So 210 vs 210 lol take a pick. This ones up what you think Smith and crouch can get.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2016, 07:24:18 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 10, 2016, 05:58:36 PM
Greene v Zorks v Zerret v Robinson
Robbo > Zorko > Zerrett > Greene
Goldy and Crouch vs Z Smith and Ablett
Thinking option 1...
Goldy and Crouch I think. Look for another way to get GAJ.
Harwood (D4) + Weitering (D5) vs Sheridan (D4) + Cheap DEF Rookie + 35k? Thinking Sheridan...
Shaw + Rance + Weitering + Greene vs Houli + Bartel + Harwood + Westhoff
Quote from: NickyBoy on March 11, 2016, 03:22:33 PM
Shaw + Rance + Weitering + Greene vs Houli + Bartel + Harwood + Westhoff
option B if Harwood gets games, would still want shaw upgrade at some stage tho
Quote from: IntegralX on March 11, 2016, 01:51:14 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 10, 2016, 07:24:18 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 10, 2016, 05:58:36 PM
Greene v Zorks v Zerret v Robinson
Robbo > Zorko > Zerrett > Greene
Goldy and Crouch vs Z Smith and Ablett
Thinking option 1...
Goldy and Crouch I think. Look for another way to get GAJ.
Harwood (D4) + Weitering (D5) vs Sheridan (D4) + Cheap DEF Rookie + 35k? Thinking Sheridan...
Yeah I think the option with Sheridan too
Franklin vs S.Gray v Zorko
Quote from: almonds on March 11, 2016, 05:22:41 PM
Franklin vs S.Gray v Zorko
Zorko or Buddy, depends what you can do with the cash if you don't choose Zorko
Quote from: GoLions on March 11, 2016, 06:23:58 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 11, 2016, 05:22:41 PM
Franklin vs S.Gray v Zorko
Zorko or Buddy, depends what you can do with the cash if you don't choose Zorko
zorkos so tempting with leppa claiming he will be playing more mid then forward
Quote from: almonds on March 11, 2016, 06:33:13 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 11, 2016, 06:23:58 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 11, 2016, 05:22:41 PM
Franklin vs S.Gray v Zorko
Zorko or Buddy, depends what you can do with the cash if you don't choose Zorko
zorkos so tempting with leppa claiming he will be playing more mid then forward
Same things been said about Gray too though...think they are all equal, I'm going with Gray because he's the only one who hasn't burnt me. :(
MCrouch, Gawn and SGray/Buddy vs Sloane, ZSmith and AHall
Quote from: tommy10 on March 11, 2016, 10:22:11 PM
MCrouch, Gawn and SGray/Buddy vs Sloane, ZSmith and AHall
Option 1
Quote from: tommy10 on March 11, 2016, 10:22:11 PM
MCrouch, Gawn and SGray/Buddy vs Sloane, ZSmith and AHall
Option A.
Just.
Shaw + Harwood vs Bartel + BSmith?
Quote from: js19 on March 12, 2016, 12:48:07 AM
Shaw + Harwood vs Bartel + BSmith?
1st option, i can't seem to trust smith enough
Quote from: js19 on March 12, 2016, 12:48:07 AM
Shaw + Harwood vs Bartel + BSmith?
Jeez that's tough..Shaw and Harwood for me but only just. Harwood looks like he'll play a rebounding role in def.
Merrett vs Hall vs Tippett
Quote from: TexR74 on March 12, 2016, 12:54:28 AM
Merrett vs Hall vs Tippett
Merrett > Hall > Tippett
Hall + Harwood vs Buddy + E. Mackenzie :P
Quote from: Big Mac on March 12, 2016, 02:25:02 AM
Hall + Harwood vs Buddy + E. Mackenzie :P
Buddy and Emac
Priddis vs hannebery
Nic Nat vs Gawn
Quote from: Seamon8er on March 12, 2016, 10:44:49 AM
Priddis vs hannebery
Priddis for reliability and consistency - Hanners can pull the larger scores but also put in stinkers. Hanners has JPK, Titchell, Jack, Mills and co competing for points as well. Need though to watch the effect Redden will have on Priddis in the NAB clash this week
Gray v Zerret v Hall v Buddy v extra 80/100k for zorko
Quote from: Bubbles on March 12, 2016, 11:17:56 AM
Nic Nat vs Gawn
Nicnat. But not by as much as you think
Milera v Menadue at M8 or F6 depending on where I play Kerridge.
Quote from: Money Shot on March 12, 2016, 11:46:08 AM
Milera v Menadue at M8 or F6 depending on where I play Kerridge.
Why not both. Early in the season no real issues having a rook on the pine making cash, In my structure I will be benching one of Bennedy, Milera, Menadue or Kerridge. I have Mills at M7.
Quote from: Ringo on March 12, 2016, 11:54:08 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on March 12, 2016, 11:46:08 AM
Milera v Menadue at M8 or F6 depending on where I play Kerridge.
Why not both. Early in the season no real issues having a rook on the pine making cash, In my structure I will be benching one of Bennedy, Milera, Menadue or Kerridge. I have Mills at M7.
Very good point. But I will be starting Kerridge and I don't want a 150k rookie on the pine. It's just something I am not a fan of and think In my circumstances the money could be spent better else where.
Duncan vs Viney vs Cripps vs Parker vs Sidey?
Quote from: Degsman on March 12, 2016, 12:57:35 PM
Duncan vs Viney vs Cripps vs Parker vs Sidey?
Reverse order.
Dusty vs Zorko
Sheridan vs Suckling
Edit: and DanHan v Pendles
Franklin vs Greene vs Hall
Quote from: DMCC10 on March 12, 2016, 01:53:20 PM
Franklin vs Greene vs Hall
Greene >= Hall >>> Buddy I think. Top 2 are close and theres daylight between them and buddy imo.
Quote from: IntegralX on March 12, 2016, 02:32:59 PM
Quote from: DMCC10 on March 12, 2016, 01:53:20 PM
Franklin vs Greene vs Hall
Greene >= Hall >>> Buddy I think. Top 2 are close and theres daylight between them and buddy imo.
Are you saying for the worst pick or the best? Would take Buddy over those guys any day of the week.
Quote from: GoLions on March 12, 2016, 03:17:15 PM
Quote from: IntegralX on March 12, 2016, 02:32:59 PM
Quote from: DMCC10 on March 12, 2016, 01:53:20 PM
Franklin vs Greene vs Hall
Greene >= Hall >>> Buddy I think. Top 2 are close and theres daylight between them and buddy imo.
Are you saying for the worst pick or the best? Would take Buddy over those guys any day of the week.
Yeh agreed
Would need to be doing something special with the extra $ if not going Buddy
Quote from: Big Mac on March 12, 2016, 03:22:39 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 12, 2016, 03:17:15 PM
Quote from: IntegralX on March 12, 2016, 02:32:59 PM
Quote from: DMCC10 on March 12, 2016, 01:53:20 PM
Franklin vs Greene vs Hall
Greene >= Hall >>> Buddy I think. Top 2 are close and theres daylight between them and buddy imo.
Are you saying for the worst pick or the best? Would take Buddy over those guys any day of the week.
Yeh agreed
Would need to be doing something special with the extra $ if not going Buddy
Honestly not interested in Buddy at all this year. One good NAB game (vs Carlton no less) and everyones all over him. High ceiling but that floor is putrid.
S.Gray v T.Greene?
Quote from: almonds on March 12, 2016, 04:27:41 PM
S.Gray v T.Greene?
I'd go with Gray, but it's a coin flip
I have one more decision to make, and my team is finally done and I am 100% happy to take it into rd1!
Shaw / Mills / 123k fwd
VS
Simpson or Birchall / 123k mid / De Goey
In both scenario's the 123k rookie is most likely Petracca who I will use to loophole early on
Really want to start Shaw, but option 2 looks better as I believe De Goey will be good enough for D6 come seasons end, so it's 2 keepers and a rookie vs 1 super keeper and 2 rookies
(Can't afford anyone above Simpson)
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 12, 2016, 04:30:45 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 12, 2016, 04:27:41 PM
S.Gray v T.Greene?
I'd go with Gray, but it's a coin flip
I have one more decision to make, and my team is finally done and I am 100% happy to take it into rd1!
Shaw / Mills / 123k fwd
VS
Simpson or Birchall / 123k mid / De Goey
In both scenario's the 123k rookie is most likely Petracca who I will use to loophole early on
Really want to start Shaw, but option 2 looks better as I believe De Goey will be good enough for D6 come seasons end, so it's 2 keepers and a rookie vs 1 super keeper and 2 rookies
(Can't afford anyone above Simpson)
for what it's worth I had shaw & mills last week, but have since gone back to simmo & degoey again, my team is locked away now pending rookies listed R1
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 12, 2016, 04:30:45 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 12, 2016, 04:27:41 PM
S.Gray v T.Greene?
I'd go with Gray, but it's a coin flip
I have one more decision to make, and my team is finally done and I am 100% happy to take it into rd1!
Shaw / Mills / 123k fwd
VS
Simpson or Birchall / 123k mid / De Goey
In both scenario's the 123k rookie is most likely Petracca who I will use to loophole early on
Really want to start Shaw, but option 2 looks better as I believe De Goey will be good enough for D6 come seasons end, so it's 2 keepers and a rookie vs 1 super keeper and 2 rookies
(Can't afford anyone above Simpson)
Option 2. De Goey looks good
Shiel v Parker
Simpson v Docherty
Westhoff v Franklin v Robinson
Quote from: backpocket on March 12, 2016, 06:06:43 PM
Shiel v Parker
Simpson v Docherty
Westhoff v Franklin v Robinson
Parker. Simmo . robbo
Quote from: backpocket on March 12, 2016, 06:06:43 PM
Shiel v Parker
Simpson v Docherty
Westhoff v Franklin v Robinson
Shiel/Doch/Hoff
Hoff in particular has gone 90+ for three straight seasons, will lift in the absence of Ryder by taking som ruck minutes imo. Docherty is far younger and might take Simmo's mantle this year, and gut says Shiel who is just an absolute jet (plus GWS will move up the ladder this year).
Quote from: MC on March 12, 2016, 06:42:51 PM
Quote from: backpocket on March 12, 2016, 06:06:43 PM
Shiel v Parker
Simpson v Docherty
Westhoff v Franklin v Robinson
Shiel/Doch/Hoff
Hoff in particular has gone 90+ for three straight seasons, will lift in the absence of Ryder by taking som ruck minutes imo. Docherty is far younger and might take Simmo's mantle this year, and gut says Shiel who is just an absolute jet (plus GWS will move up the ladder this year).
Thanks MC they are my 3 picks ATM just. I understand Parker is underpriced but don't see him busting into top 10 mids as shiel is.
Been on docherty all pre season seems like Carlton have some direction and him being next in line after the veterans I think he'll step up. The dilemma is do I want to go against people with buddy with the chance of him belting out 110 point halves like he can?
s.martin vs nicnat
Quote from: almonds on March 12, 2016, 10:32:57 PM
s.martin vs nicnat
Honestly it's a coin flip for me. I'm running with NN at the moment, not really sure why though
Wells and B. Crouch vs De Goey and Mills
Quote from: cptawesom3 on March 13, 2016, 12:46:14 AM
Wells and B. Crouch vs De Goey and Mills
First option although all 4 should be a consideration.
Quote from: IntegralX on March 12, 2016, 03:38:12 PM
Quote from: Big Mac on March 12, 2016, 03:22:39 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 12, 2016, 03:17:15 PM
Quote from: IntegralX on March 12, 2016, 02:32:59 PM
Quote from: DMCC10 on March 12, 2016, 01:53:20 PM
Franklin vs Greene vs Hall
Greene >= Hall >>> Buddy I think. Top 2 are close and theres daylight between them and buddy imo.
Are you saying for the worst pick or the best? Would take Buddy over those guys any day of the week.
Yeh agreed
Would need to be doing something special with the extra $ if not going Buddy
Honestly not interested in Buddy at all this year. One good NAB game (vs Carlton no less) and everyones all over him. High ceiling but that floor is putrid.
Has nothing to do with his NAB game
More to do with his 7 years of averaging over 90
Seedsman or the Cannon? Both have been pretty good in the nab cup and I'm a bit torn. Can't even come down to byes because they both have one in Rd. 13!
Quote from: Southstorm on March 13, 2016, 02:32:54 AM
Seedsman or the Cannon? Both have been pretty good in the nab cup and I'm a bit torn. Can't even come down to byes because they both have one in Rd. 13!
Cannon if you really had to choose one of them.
Toby Greene or Aaron Hall?
Aaron Hall has averaged 111.7 in the 3 NAB Challenge matches, along with averaging 116.8 in the last 6 matches of 2015. But I worry, since during most of these matches Gold Coast have been without Gablett, O'Meara, Prestia, Swallow etc.
Toby Greene on the other hand, lot of hype and talk, with one NAB Challenge match of 133. Didn't finish 2015 well, averaging 85.3, but was playing a different role to this year with the loss of Adam Treloar to Collingwood.
Hall for mine.
Greene butchers it a bit too much for my liking.
Quote from: PiPies on March 13, 2016, 11:25:59 AM
Hall for mine.
Greene butchers it a bit too much for my liking.
Aaron Hall - 69.3% effective disposal
Toby Greene - 69.1%
Aaron Hall - 2.7 clangers / game
Toby Greene - 3.5
Not a great deal in it....but fair point nonetheless.
place in order guys on who you think will have more Total points.
Fyfe/Gazza/Danger/Rocky/Pendles
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 13, 2016, 11:59:51 AM
place in order guys on who you think will have more Total points.
Fyfe/Gazza/Danger/Rocky/Pendles
Assuming all play the same # of games then:
Fyfe
Danger
Pendles
Gazz
Rocky
Heater or Laird or Bartel.... Pick 2
Quote from: timtim on March 13, 2016, 12:28:08 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 13, 2016, 11:59:51 AM
place in order guys on who you think will have more Total points.
Fyfe/Gazza/Danger/Rocky/Pendles
Assuming all play the same # of games then:
Fyfe
Danger
Pendles
Gazz
Rocky
You tipping danger and pendles to outscore Gazza. Big call
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 13, 2016, 12:32:53 PM
Quote from: timtim on March 13, 2016, 12:28:08 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 13, 2016, 11:59:51 AM
place in order guys on who you think will have more Total points.
Fyfe/Gazza/Danger/Rocky/Pendles
Assuming all play the same # of games then:
Fyfe
Danger
Pendles
Gazz
Rocky
You tipping danger and pendles to outscore Gazza. Big call
Just a hunch
"Culture" issues don't just go away over a pre-season... have a feeling it may pop up again as the season goes on and affect output
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 13, 2016, 12:32:53 PM
Quote from: timtim on March 13, 2016, 12:28:08 PM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 13, 2016, 11:59:51 AM
place in order guys on who you think will have more Total points.
Fyfe/Gazza/Danger/Rocky/Pendles
Assuming all play the same # of games then:
Fyfe
Danger
Pendles
Gazz
Rocky
You tipping danger and pendles to outscore Gazza. Big call
Danger looks absolutely awesome and is a massive chance to outscore GAJ on merit this year.
Dusty + Wines vs Hannebury + Zerrett/S. Gray?
No Dusty leaves me with Barlow/S. Gray/Zerrett as F1-2-3
Ward & Shaw v Pendles & Birchall
Quote from: Bubbles on March 13, 2016, 02:29:10 PM
Ward & Shaw v Pendles & Birchall
Ward/Shaw, no contest.
Shaw is an elite def, whilst Birchall has been on the decline for a few years, and the difference between Pendles and Ward isn't great enough to make up for that.
Zorko vs Dahlhaus?
Quote from: Ricochet on March 13, 2016, 02:51:17 PM
Quote from: jfitty on March 13, 2016, 02:39:57 PM
Zorko vs Dahlhaus?
Very close but i'd go Zorko
I've had Dahlhaus all preseason, but Zorko is really tempting me!
Leppa has said Zorko will have midfield with occasional forward stints. Know Rocky not playing in the NAB but Zorko is beasting it with 7 tackles at half time.
Quote from: Ringo on March 13, 2016, 03:32:59 PM
Leppa has said Zorko will have midfield with occasional forward stints. Know Rocky not playing in the NAB but Zorko is beasting it with 7 tackles at half time.
Even with Rocky and Beams in? Him and Dahlhaus will probably play similar roles
In case I decide to do the unthinkable and don't start GAJ...
Heater + Treloar v GAJ + Laird
Quote from: Ringo on March 13, 2016, 03:32:59 PM
Leppa has said Zorko will have midfield with occasional forward stints. Know Rocky not playing in the NAB but Zorko is beasting it with 7 tackles at half time.
Remember the reduced cap on rotations so all will spend time forward.
Quote from: Ringo on March 13, 2016, 04:08:37 PM
Quote from: Ringo on March 13, 2016, 03:32:59 PM
Leppa has said Zorko will have midfield with occasional forward stints. Know Rocky not playing in the NAB but Zorko is beasting it with 7 tackles at half time.
Remember the reduced cap on rotations so all will spend time forward.
Ah that's true Ringo!
How about Montagna vs Dahlhaus/Zorko, forgetting about the price difference
Quote from: Nige on March 13, 2016, 03:52:27 PM
In case I decide to do the unthinkable and don't start GAJ...
Heater + Treloar v GAJ + Laird
Gotta be GAJ for just 20k more than Shaw
Can't decide between these 2.
Shaw + Gresham
vs
Birchall + Crouch (racked up 40 yesterday and still believe he can go 95+)
Westhoff + Menadue Vs. Martin + Rookie (already have kerridge McCarthy petracca McDonaldTip)
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 13, 2016, 04:52:43 PM
Westhoff + Menadue Vs. Martin + Rookie (already have kerridge McCarthy petracca McDonaldTip)
Surely Martin & Menadue is possible
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 13, 2016, 04:21:43 PM
Can't decide between these 2.
Shaw + Gresham
vs
Birchall + Crouch (racked up 40 yesterday and still believe he can go 95+)
I think Shaw and a rookie for mine, bit unsure about Crouch
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 13, 2016, 04:52:43 PM
Westhoff + Menadue Vs. Martin + Rookie (already have kerridge McCarthy petracca McDonaldTip)
I'd find a way to go Martin and Menadue as fanTCfool said, otherwise Martin and a rookie
Lonergan/Weits vs Birchall/Hartley?
Edit: I've slowly weened out the mid prices in defense today, so my next decision is Birch/Harwood or Boyd/Dea?
Quote from: no eye deer on March 13, 2016, 06:13:43 PM
Lonergan/Weits vs Birchall/Hartley?
Edit: I've slowly weened out the mid prices in defense today, so my next decision is Birch/Harwood or Boyd/Dea?
Boyd and Dea for me.
I have a new one (really should get off Supercoach for a bit):
Bartel vs Laird
Quote from: jfitty on March 13, 2016, 06:33:09 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on March 13, 2016, 06:13:43 PM
Lonergan/Weits vs Birchall/Hartley?
Edit: I've slowly weened out the mid prices in defense today, so my next decision is Birch/Harwood or Boyd/Dea?
Boyd and Dea for me.
I have a new one (really should get off Supercoach for a bit):
Bartel vs Laird
Laird by a mile in my view. I suspect they'll average similarly (95-odd) but I feel as if Bartel is likely to miss 4-5 games, making his average more like 88 if you factor in likely rookie scores of 65.
Quote from: MC on March 13, 2016, 07:16:08 PM
Quote from: jfitty on March 13, 2016, 06:33:09 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on March 13, 2016, 06:13:43 PM
Lonergan/Weits vs Birchall/Hartley?
Edit: I've slowly weened out the mid prices in defense today, so my next decision is Birch/Harwood or Boyd/Dea?
Boyd and Dea for me.
I have a new one (really should get off Supercoach for a bit):
Bartel vs Laird
Laird by a mile in my view. I suspect they'll average similarly (95-odd) but I feel as if Bartel is likely to miss 4-5 games, making his average more like 88 if you factor in likely rookie scores of 65.
Just re-shuffled and put Laird in for Bartel.. Do like the look of him at D3, but doesn't look right without Bartel there
oliver v mills
still cant separate these two players.
Quote from: lucky on March 13, 2016, 07:42:30 PM
oliver v mills
still cant separate these two players.
Oliver is looking pretty good in my opinion
Shiel vs Parker
Quote from: lucky on March 13, 2016, 07:42:30 PM
oliver v mills
still cant separate these two players.
Mills I think, Oliver had a 58% DE today and only 7 CP, the two goals have inflated his score.
Weitering or Dea?
Quote from: mzunguman on March 13, 2016, 10:32:20 PM
Weitering or Dea?
I'm picking Dea based on the cheaper price, although I think their output will be similar.
Quote from: Bully on March 13, 2016, 09:00:43 PM
Quote from: lucky on March 13, 2016, 07:42:30 PM
oliver v mills
still cant separate these two players.
Mills I think, Oliver had a 58% DE today and only 7 CP, the two goals have inflated his score.
Just checked and Oliver had 68% TOG and 92 points, becoming impossible to ignore.
Pendles and Gaff V Priddis and Sidebottom?
Quote from: lucky on March 13, 2016, 07:42:30 PM
oliver v mills
still cant separate these two players.
Why not both?? ;) I have Mills and Oliver at M7 & M8 atm
Quote from: leighroids on March 13, 2016, 10:55:03 PM
Pendles and Gaff V Priddis and Sidebottom?
Priddis + Sidey
Quote from: tommy10 on March 13, 2016, 11:07:36 PM
Quote from: lucky on March 13, 2016, 07:42:30 PM
oliver v mills
still cant separate these two players.
Why not both?? ;) I have Mills and Oliver at M7 & M8 atm
I have both in my team at the moment.
S.Gray + Harwood v Hurn + De Goey
Goldy DeGoey and Dusty vs Gawn SGray and Montagna
Quote from: tommy10 on March 13, 2016, 11:11:36 PM
Goldy DeGoey and Dusty vs Gawn SGray and Montagna
1st option.
Harwood, Libba, L.McCarthy vs Dea, Oliver, Hall
could I start a team without Libba..
Goldy + weitering or z.smith and Rance with the thought that I'd be using smith as a stepping stone to goldy?
Quote from: Spotted gum on March 13, 2016, 11:52:30 PM
Goldy + weitering or z.smith and Rance with the thought that I'd be using smith as a stepping stone to goldy?
Goldy and Weitering mate
Quote from: dmac07 on March 13, 2016, 11:42:24 PM
Harwood, Libba, L.McCarthy vs Dea, Oliver, Hall
could I start a team without Libba..
First option by far
Harwood vs Wilson (GWS)
Callan ward vs Dylan shiel vs luke Parker ?
Quote from: tommy10 on March 13, 2016, 11:11:36 PM
Goldy DeGoey and Dusty vs Gawn SGray and Montagna
First
Mitch Robbo + Brad Crouch + 75k V De Goey + Sidey
Quote from: tttt on March 14, 2016, 03:30:43 AM
Callan ward vs Dylan shiel vs luke Parker ?
I like ward
Another - Goldy, B.Crouch &110k V Gawn &Sidebottom
Dahl and Broad v Simpson and Menadue.
Rance + Parker vs Bartel + Gray/Hanneberry
Lonergan + 2 cheap rookies (which ones?) or
Weit + Mills + Milera
goldy, s.gray, $117k rookie or nicnat, westhoff, l.mccarthy
Quote from: billnats on March 14, 2016, 11:56:25 AM
Lonergan + 2 cheap rookies (which ones?) or
Weit + Mills + Milera
Weit + Mills + Milera
Quote from: hawkboy80 on March 14, 2016, 01:04:34 PM
goldy, s.gray, $117k rookie or nicnat, westhoff, l.mccarthy
op1
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 14, 2016, 01:11:17 PM
Quote from: billnats on March 14, 2016, 11:56:25 AM
Lonergan + 2 cheap rookies (which ones?) or
Weit + Mills + Milera
Weit + Mills + Milera
Weit + Mills + Milera
sheridan v sutcliffe v J lonergan v T mackenzie
im $4.1k short of changing De Goey & Gresham into B Kennedy/B Crouch.
which do you think will score more??
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 14, 2016, 02:12:46 PM
im $4.1k short of changing De Goey & Gresham into B Kennedy/B Crouch.
which do you think will score more??
Kennedy & Crouch will score more if crouch can stay injury free
B Smith & Weit/Aish or Weit & Aish
Priddis or R Gray? or B Crouch & $$
Johannisen and Dea vs D.Howard and Birch
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 14, 2016, 02:49:46 PM
Johannisen and Dea vs D.Howard and Birch
Option A.
Quote from: reenergised on March 14, 2016, 02:47:46 PM
Priddis or R Gray? or B Crouch & $$
Priddis > gray > Crouch + $$
Rance v Laird
hurn/zorko v bartel/s.gray
Bartel & s. Gray 100%
Fyfe & E. McKenzie (D4) or Ward & Seedsman (D4)
Westhoff vs Robinson
Johanisen vs Hurn vs Suckling
Quote from: Keith Urban on March 14, 2016, 04:57:23 PM
hurn/zorko v bartel/s.gray
Bartel and Sam Gray, but I do really like Hurn as an option! Currently my D4 with Bartel at D2.
Quote from: piesfan1989 on March 14, 2016, 07:25:48 PM
Fyfe & E. McKenzie (D4) or Ward & Seedsman (D4)
Neither.
Quote from: piesfan1989 on March 14, 2016, 07:25:48 PM
Fyfe & E. McKenzie (D4) or Ward & Seedsman (D4)
Fyfe and any rookie you don't have.
bennedy v milera
S.Martin + $123,000 rookie (gore atm) v Gawn + Mills
Quote from: mzunguman on March 14, 2016, 11:07:54 PM
S.Martin + $123,000 rookie (gore atm) v Gawn + Mills
Surely a trick question - Gawn and Mills in an absolute canter
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 14, 2016, 11:09:36 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 14, 2016, 11:07:54 PM
S.Martin + $123,000 rookie (gore atm) v Gawn + Mills
Surely a trick question - Gawn and Mills in an absolute canter
Yeah look... Fair call ::)
Nick Graham v Tom Liberatore
Quote from: Hagebear on March 14, 2016, 11:12:19 PM
Nick Graham v Tom Liberatore
Libba only coz of price..
Libba vs Brad Crouch
&
Milera vs Mccarthy
Quote from: HotTiges on March 14, 2016, 11:17:00 PM
Quote from: Hagebear on March 14, 2016, 11:12:19 PM
Nick Graham v Tom Liberatore
Libba only coz of price..
Libba vs Brad Crouch
&
Milera vs Mccarthy
Libba
Milera
Dea/Weitering/Milera v De Goey/Broad/Brown
Quote from: Keith Urban on March 15, 2016, 01:19:18 AM
Dea/Weitering/Milera v De Goey/Broad/Brown
First option.
Quote from: Keith Urban on March 15, 2016, 01:19:18 AM
Dea/Weitering/Milera v De Goey/Broad/Brown
Dea/Weits/Milera
Billings vs Hall vs S.Gray
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 14, 2016, 11:09:36 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 14, 2016, 11:07:54 PM
S.Martin + $123,000 rookie (gore atm) v Gawn + Mills
Surely a trick question - Gawn and Mills in an absolute canter
Quote from: Keith Urban on March 15, 2016, 01:19:18 AM
Dea/Weitering/Milera v De Goey/Broad/Brown
Depends on mix of other fwds and backs... I have 2 each of those combos.
Quote from: steven3 on March 15, 2016, 01:39:09 AM
Quote from: Keith Urban on March 15, 2016, 01:19:18 AM
Dea/Weitering/Milera v De Goey/Broad/Brown
Dea/Weits/Milera
Billings vs Hall vs S.Gray
Billings for mine.
Pendles/Gazza/Graham vs. Shiel/Rocky/Parker
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 15, 2016, 08:23:58 AM
Pendles/Gazza/Graham vs. Shiel/Rocky/Parker
Find a way to go GAJ Pendles Rocky
Quote from: Ricochet on March 15, 2016, 09:46:45 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 15, 2016, 08:23:58 AM
Pendles/Gazza/Graham vs. Shiel/Rocky/Parker
Find a way to go GAJ Pendles Rocky
Love to but can't afford it without ruining other lines
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 15, 2016, 10:28:10 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 15, 2016, 09:46:45 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 15, 2016, 08:23:58 AM
Pendles/Gazza/Graham vs. Shiel/Rocky/Parker
Find a way to go GAJ Pendles Rocky
Love to but can't afford it without ruining other lines
Hmm ok, if you go GAJ and Rocky,how much cash do you have left for the 3rd?
Quote from: Ricochet on March 15, 2016, 10:37:17 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 15, 2016, 10:28:10 AM
Quote from: Ricochet on March 15, 2016, 09:46:45 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 15, 2016, 08:23:58 AM
Pendles/Gazza/Graham vs. Shiel/Rocky/Parker
Find a way to go GAJ Pendles Rocky
Love to but can't afford it without ruining other lines
Hmm ok, if you go GAJ and Rocky,how much cash do you have left for the 3rd?
$471k
Think I kike option 1 but putting it out here for comments
Nic Nat + Danger v Stef Martin + Priddis
Quote from: Ringo on March 15, 2016, 01:15:11 PM
Think I kike option 1 but putting it out here for comments
Nic Nat + Danger v Stef Martin + Priddis
Option 1 because I think Danger will explode.
Goldstein + rookie(117K) +rookie($103k)
vs
Lobbe + Menadue +Milera + $$ (for rd 3 team repairs)
Quote from: Ringo on March 15, 2016, 01:15:11 PM
Think I kike option 1 but putting it out here for comments
Nic Nat + Danger v Stef Martin + Priddis
Nic Nat (105-110) + Danger (115-125) = 220-235
Stef Martin (110-115) + Priddis (110-115) = 220-230
Not much in it, but Danger has the potential to go bananas, so option 1 for me.
Dusty/Dea/Menadue v A.Hall/De Goey/Mills
Quote from: Bubbles on March 15, 2016, 02:07:13 PM
Dusty/Dea/Menadue v A.Hall/De Goey/Mills
I would go option 1, but definitely try to fit in Mills!
EDIT:
What about:
Parish VS Crowley Vs C. Ellis
Trent Mckenzie & cash vs Macmillan
Quote from: Bubbles on March 15, 2016, 02:07:13 PM
Dusty/Dea/Menadue v A.Hall/De Goey/Mills
Dusty, Dea, Menadue for me.
Quote from: TexR74 on March 15, 2016, 02:13:09 PM
Trent Mckenzie & cash vs Macmillan
Macmillan by a mile
Duggan vs Simpkin? Struggling to find a good option between 200-300k in the forwards aside from Wells
thoughts on mitch robinson at f2?
Oliver v Parish v Simpkin
Shaw + Bennedy vs Bartel + De Goey?
Quote from: js19 on March 15, 2016, 03:55:49 PM
Shaw + Bennedy vs Bartel + De Goey?
Shaw + Bennedy
Smith and Wines vs. Sheridan and Pendles/Priddis?
Quote from: BomberSam on March 15, 2016, 04:19:04 PM
Smith and Wines vs. Sheridan and Pendles/Priddis?
Option 2 by a mile.
JPK vs Gray?
and
Kommer vs L McCarthy?
Quote from: Spite on March 15, 2016, 04:26:39 PM
JPK vs Gray?
and
Kommer vs L McCarthy?
Gray with the good draw will go big early.
McCarthy probably has better scoring prospects than Kommer
Houli + Parker v B.Smith + Pendles?
Quote from: TexR74 on March 15, 2016, 02:18:35 PM
Duggan vs Simpkin? Struggling to find a good option between 200-300k in the forwards aside from Wells
Duggan by a mile. Better player in a better team. :)
Wines, Smith and Libba vs. Pendles/Priddis, Simpson and Oliver?
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 15, 2016, 04:35:30 PM
Quote from: Spite on March 15, 2016, 04:26:39 PM
JPK vs Gray?
and
Kommer vs L McCarthy?
Gray with the good draw will go big early.
McCarthy probably has better scoring prospects than Kommer
Houli + Parker v B.Smith + Pendles?
Smith and Pendles for me man
Quote from: BomberSam on March 15, 2016, 05:03:35 PM
Wines, Smith and Libba vs. Pendles/Priddis, Simpson and Oliver?
Actually prefer the second option here
midpriced madness or guns and rookie
Bartel + B.Kennedy v Seedsman + Degoey
Quote from: Holz on March 15, 2016, 05:23:03 PM
midpriced madness or guns and rookie
Bartel + B.Kennedy v Seedsman + Degoey
You already know the answer to this...Bartel + Bennedy.
Shaw with Wells at F2 (Menadue on the field, Tippa off)
vs.
Dusty with Wells at F3 (Tippa on the field, Menadue off)
A bit confusing but I need Menadue on the bench to fit Dusty :o
Quote from: Vulpes on March 15, 2016, 05:55:53 PM
Shaw with Wells at F2 (Menadue on the field, Tippa off)
vs.
Dusty with Wells at F3 (Tippa on the field, Menadue off)
A bit confusing but I need Menadue on the bench to fit Dusty :o
I wanna say Shaw is mite important than dusty. Additionally menadue should out score tippa anyway.
Dea/Pendles Vs Shaw/Oliver?
So my current setup is Boyd, Laird, Bartell, Dea, Brown, Adams and Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Gaz, Rocky, Libba, Crouch, Mills on the field,
Vs
Shaw, Boyd, Laird, Bartell, Brown, Adams and The same mids minus Pendles, but plus Oliver.
I really think the structure is better with Shaw, but this will be my first year without the ever reliable Pendles. I'm finding it hard to let him go! :P
Gibson vs Hurn + Cash vs Brodie Smith + Cash
Menadue and Adams (WB) vs Davis and Dea
Quote from: fanTCfool on March 16, 2016, 12:16:57 AM
Gibson vs Hurn + Cash vs Brodie Smith + Cash
Personally, I'd go Hurn + Cash. Followed by Smith + Cash. Hurn is my D4 and I can't see that changing.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 16, 2016, 12:48:00 AM
Menadue and Adams (WB) vs Davis and Dea
Menadue and Adams by a whisker!
Westhoff v Sam Gray
and Johannisen v Seedsman please. :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\
Only concern is points not $$$
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 16, 2016, 02:01:32 AM
Westhoff v Sam Gray
and Johannisen v Seedsman please. :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\ :-\
Only concern is points not $$$
Westoff. Lock him in :p
Johan is i had to pick based on gut feel.
Hello Fanfooty people, Judd Magic back for another year of SC.
Which 2 out of Shaw, Laird and Boyd?
Also Greene or Hall?
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 16, 2016, 03:50:19 AM
Hello Fanfooty people, Judd Magic back for another year of SC.
Which 2 out of Shaw, Laird and Boyd?
Also Greene or Hall?
If money is no issue then Shaw & Laird.
Probably take Hall but then again I think Buddy is the value bet at that price.
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 16, 2016, 03:50:19 AM
Hello Fanfooty people, Judd Magic back for another year of SC.
Which 2 out of Shaw, Laird and Boyd?
Also Greene or Hall?
Shaw and Boyd by a whisker for me. Greene to break out, I'm not sure Hall can keep up these scores all season.
Quote from: no eye deer on March 15, 2016, 11:54:14 PM
Dea/Pendles Vs Shaw/Oliver?
So my current setup is Boyd, Laird, Bartell, Dea, Brown, Adams and Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Gaz, Rocky, Libba, Crouch, Mills on the field,
Vs
Shaw, Boyd, Laird, Bartell, Brown, Adams and The same mids minus Pendles, but plus Oliver.
I really think the structure is better with Shaw, but this will be my first year without the ever reliable Pendles. I'm finding it hard to let him go! :P
Bump! Any opinions guys? It's doing my head in!
Quote from: no eye deer on March 16, 2016, 07:46:57 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on March 15, 2016, 11:54:14 PM
Dea/Pendles Vs Shaw/Oliver?
So my current setup is Boyd, Laird, Bartell, Dea, Brown, Adams and Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Gaz, Rocky, Libba, Crouch, Mills on the field,
Vs
Shaw, Boyd, Laird, Bartell, Brown, Adams and The same mids minus Pendles, but plus Oliver.
I really think the structure is better with Shaw, but this will be my first year without the ever reliable Pendles. I'm finding it hard to let him go! :P
Bump! Any opinions guys? It's doing my head in!
Go with Pendles. Much better value at a similar price.
Oliver + 150k vs. Libba?
Quote from: BomberSam on March 16, 2016, 09:29:17 AM
Oliver + 150k vs. Libba?
Libba man. Dont be discouraged by his last outing. He's a must have
Harwood v Dea + $100k
Worried about Harwood and his early draw. Which is the reason why I would pick him, with me needing him to score well early to rise in cash for an early upgrade. See him averaging 80 but could only go 65-70 early on and Dea is an unknown. Surely won't be as efficient during the normal season?
Quote from: _wato on March 16, 2016, 11:36:36 AM
Harwood v Dea + $100k
Worried about Harwood and his early draw. Which is the reason why I would pick him, with me needing him to score well early to rise in cash for an early upgrade. See him averaging 80 but could only go 65-70 early on and Dea is an unknown. Surely won't be as efficient during the normal season?
Depending on where you used the money saved, I'd probably go Dea and the cash
Quote from: jfitty on March 16, 2016, 11:40:10 AM
Quote from: _wato on March 16, 2016, 11:36:36 AM
Harwood v Dea + $100k
Worried about Harwood and his early draw. Which is the reason why I would pick him, with me needing him to score well early to rise in cash for an early upgrade. See him averaging 80 but could only go 65-70 early on and Dea is an unknown. Surely won't be as efficient during the normal season?
Depending on where you used the money saved, I'd probably go Dea and the cash
This.
Milera vs. Bennedy.
With a few Melbourne boys coming back does Milera have better JS?
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 16, 2016, 11:42:27 AM
Milera vs. Bennedy.
With a few Melbourne boys coming back does Milera have better JS?
Still would go Bennedy.
I'm not too keen on Milera myself. I think he will get games early, but won't be in the team consistently
Quote from: jfitty on March 16, 2016, 11:45:25 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 16, 2016, 11:42:27 AM
Milera vs. Bennedy.
With a few Melbourne boys coming back does Milera have better JS?
Still would go Bennedy.
I'm not too keen on Milera myself. I think he will get games early, but won't be in the team consistently
Kennedy is a gun... Exactly what the Dee's need and he's more SuperCoach friendly
Treloar v Shiel
Quote from: fasttrack13 on March 16, 2016, 11:54:01 AM
Treloar v Shiel
Shiel. They kept the best and shipped the rest.
seedsmen and de goey vs weiters and hall
Quote from: _wato on March 16, 2016, 12:00:57 PM
Quote from: Marstar on March 16, 2016, 11:57:03 AM
Quote from: fasttrack13 on March 16, 2016, 11:54:01 AM
Treloar v Shiel
Shiel. They kept the best and shipped the rest.
False
Neither I would say shiel will start stronger as Treloar an interuppted preseason. Probably end up about the same as Treloar should outscore slightly by round 5 onwards.
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 16, 2016, 01:14:22 PM
seedsmen and de goey vs weiters and hall
Weiters and Hall
wines vs hanners
Quote from: nperera95 on March 16, 2016, 01:41:03 PM
wines vs hanners
Hanners but depends what you use extra cash if you go Wines though
Quote from: TomK on March 16, 2016, 01:41:58 PM
Quote from: nperera95 on March 16, 2016, 01:41:03 PM
wines vs hanners
Hanners but depends what you use extra cash if you go Wines though
I'd go Wines anyway personally, the cash is a tasty bonus!
Shiel v Parker v Viney
I want to drop Houli down to a D6 keeper in the 85-90 range to free up money for rookies, so consider points and cash.
Hurn vs. Rich vs. Lonergan
Quote from: almonds on March 16, 2016, 05:43:58 PM
Shiel v Parker v Viney
I reckon Parker > Shiel >> Viney
Parker just on likelihood to play more games.
Quote from: Vulpes on March 16, 2016, 05:44:45 PM
I want to drop Houli down to a D6 keeper in the 85-90 range to free up money for rookies, so consider points and cash.
Hurn vs. Rich vs. Lonergan
Points for price do you mean? Because if it's a keeper you want, cash generation is irrelevant.
As far as keepers go, i'd say:
Hurn > Rich > Lonergan
Hurn (since he broke-out in 2009) has averaged 85SC/19 games over the past 7 seasons, 88 if you exclude last year where he was required to play more accountable footy in the absence of Brown and EMack.
Rich averaged well from day 1, 85 in his first season. Over the same time period, Rich has averaged 83SC/17 games and has been threatening to 'break-out' for years. He could have a spike season, but I think the water has found its level.
Lonergan is the riskiest (also cheapest) but is as yet unproven.
As far as picking a keeper who is more likely to hit that 85-90 mark, I feel Hurn is your man.
S.Gray v Hall
Hall
Quote from: almonds on March 16, 2016, 08:00:19 PM
S.Gray v Hall
Hall for higher fluctuation (better ceiling, lower floor)
Gray for consistency.
Choose according to the level of risk you already have in your team or are willing to take.
Rich and Hall
Vs
Lonergan and SGray
D3 AND F3
Quote from: almonds on March 16, 2016, 08:00:19 PM
S.Gray v Hall
Hall for me.
Finalising my team:
Bartel & Pendlebury or Laird & JPK?
Rich vs. Yeo?
Quote from: jfitty on March 16, 2016, 10:44:43 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 16, 2016, 08:00:19 PM
S.Gray v Hall
Hall for me.
Finalising my team:
Bartel & Pendlebury or Laird & JPK?
2nd option..do you have R Gray??
Quote from: Sicko on March 16, 2016, 10:46:30 PM
Rich vs. Yeo?
rich. could do anything playing more mid this year
Quote from: jfitty on March 16, 2016, 10:44:43 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 16, 2016, 08:00:19 PM
S.Gray v Hall
Hall for me.
Finalising my team:
Bartel & Pendlebury or Laird & JPK?
Bartel and Pendlebury without a doubt
Quote from: HotTiges on March 16, 2016, 10:47:07 PM
Quote from: jfitty on March 16, 2016, 10:44:43 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 16, 2016, 08:00:19 PM
S.Gray v Hall
Hall for me.
Finalising my team:
Bartel & Pendlebury or Laird & JPK?
2nd option..do you have R Gray??
I don't, but I think I like Kennedy a bit more
Pendlebury or Hannebery
Rance or Laird
Dusty/Dahl and DeGoey vs Buddy and Hall
Boyd + Gawn
vs
Simpson + S Martin
this is for D2 + R2
???
Please help on this one guys and gals. My last one and I can't pick.
B Smith v J Johannisen
:) ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 17, 2016, 04:00:46 AM
???
Please help on this one guys and gals. My last one and I can't pick.
B Smith v J Johannisen
:) ;)
Gut !!!! What's it saying?
B.Smith delivering or flopping?
J.Joh nailing it or failing it?
It's:
Will B.Smith do what we and Adelaide expect him to do
Vs
Can J.Joh do what we and the Doggies expect him to do
My brain says go with the guy you know is capable but failed the mark 1st time round .....
But my gut says that hairdo will tonne up !!!
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on March 17, 2016, 02:41:33 AM
Boyd + Gawn
vs
Simpson + S Martin
this is for D2 + R2
Option 2 based on chances of not needing bench cover for Boyd being rested.
Think there are better comboes for the same money if you aren't set on just those options.
My prefered is Houli / NN with on budget.
Rance v Houli v Bartel v Laird
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 09:19:36 AM
Rance v Houli v Bartel v Laird
I'd take Laird out of that lot
B. Crouch/ Broad or Oliver/ weitering?
Absolutely loving this post!
If you were to drop one, who would it be (and why)?
Fyfe, Danger, Ablett, Rockliff... Or am I crazy and should keep all 4. ::)
Quote from: cortez on March 17, 2016, 09:48:27 AM
B. Crouch/ Broad or Oliver/ weitering?
Oliver Weitering for me
Quote from: baz1 on March 17, 2016, 10:08:11 AM
Absolutely loving this post!
If you were to drop one, who would it be (and why)?
Fyfe, Danger, Ablett, Rockliff... Or am I crazy and should keep all 4. ::)
100% agree!
IF.... I'd drop Ablett just based on the injury niggles... I reckon he's bound to miss games
Quote from: cortez on March 17, 2016, 09:48:27 AM
B. Crouch/ Broad or Oliver/ weitering?
Crouch/Broad
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 09:19:36 AM
Rance v Houli v Bartel v Laird
Houli > Laird > Rance > Bartel
Houli over Laird because of his favourable history, Rance as a KPP worries me and Bartel will miss too many games for my liking.
Quote from: Marstar on March 17, 2016, 05:31:31 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 17, 2016, 04:00:46 AM
???
Please help on this one guys and gals. My last one and I can't pick.
B Smith v J Johannisen
:) ;)
Gut !!!! What's it saying?
B.Smith delivering or flopping?
J.Joh nailing it or failing it?
It's:
Will B.Smith do what we and Adelaide expect him to do
Vs
Can J.Joh do what we and the Doggies expect him to do
My brain says go with the guy you know is capable but failed the mark 1st time round .....
But my gut says that hairdo will tonne up !!!
Thanks "M" the gut says JJ so it's done and dusted. That gives me an unusual defence of :-
T McDonald, D Rich, J Johannisen, T Lonergan, D Weitering, M Dea, // M Hartley, M Adams. Selection night permitting I think I may stick with that.
Kommer vs Grimley ?
Quote from: Sicko on March 17, 2016, 01:54:43 PM
Kommer vs Grimley ?
Ugh...
Grimley just for his ruck cover.
Seedsman vs Harwood
Quote from: tommy10 on March 17, 2016, 02:45:48 PM
Seedsman vs Harwood
Seedsman for sure.
Gawn/Dea vs Martin/Hartley??
Quote from: Sicko on March 17, 2016, 02:48:26 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 17, 2016, 02:45:48 PM
Seedsman vs Harwood
Seedsman for sure.
Gawn/Dea vs Martin/Hartley??
Martin & Hartley imo.
Martin scores less points from HO so will be less effected by the new rulings, Dea apparently has sketchy JS so Hartley over him.
S.Martin+Weitering+Oliver v Gawn+Dea+B.Crouch
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 03:06:21 PM
S.Martin+Weitering+Oliver v Gawn+Dea+B.Crouch
Gawn, Dea and B.Crouch ........comfortably
Quote from: nostradamus on March 17, 2016, 03:21:58 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 03:06:21 PM
S.Martin+Weitering+Oliver v Gawn+Dea+B.Crouch
Gawn, Dea and B.Crouch ........comfortably
Not sure 'comfortably' is the right word...
Martin 110-115 > Gawn 105-110 (+5)
Weitering 80 > Dea 65 (+15)
Oliver 75 < Crouch 95 (-20)
Looks pretty even overall to me, though option #1 will arguably make more cash and help you to have a completed team quicker.
Degoey (forward) v B Crouch - Would mean playing Wells at F3 Crouch at M7
R. Gray vs Rocky??
I really like Port's early fixture but know Rocky will be hungry for some leather too. Not sure if Rocky will go huge early after an interupted pre-season??
Quote from: freddo81 on March 17, 2016, 07:49:15 PM
R. Gray vs Rocky??
I really like Port's early fixture but know Rocky will be hungry for some leather too. Not sure if Rocky will go huge early after an interupted pre-season??
Serious? Rockliff without a second thought.
Quote from: Ringo on March 17, 2016, 07:42:54 PM
Degoey (forward) v B Crouch - Would mean playing Wells at F3 Crouch at M7
I'll take Crouch... If he stays on track I reckon he'll go real well
Pendles or Ablett?
Quote from: MC on March 17, 2016, 04:11:21 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on March 17, 2016, 03:21:58 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 03:06:21 PM
S.Martin+Weitering+Oliver v Gawn+Dea+B.Crouch
Gawn, Dea and B.Crouch ........comfortably
Not sure 'comfortably' is the right word...
Martin 110-115 > Gawn 105-110 (+5)
Weitering 80 > Dea 65 (+15)
Oliver 75 < Crouch 95 (-20)
Looks pretty even overall to me, though option #1 will arguably make more cash and help you to have a completed team quicker.
Very generous with Weitering there
Quote from: Big Mac on March 17, 2016, 08:54:34 PM
Quote from: MC on March 17, 2016, 04:11:21 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on March 17, 2016, 03:21:58 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 03:06:21 PM
S.Martin+Weitering+Oliver v Gawn+Dea+B.Crouch
Gawn, Dea and B.Crouch ........comfortably
Not sure 'comfortably' is the right word...
Martin 110-115 > Gawn 105-110 (+5)
Weitering 80 > Dea 65 (+15)
Oliver 75 < Crouch 95 (-20)
Looks pretty even overall to me, though option #1 will arguably make more cash and help you to have a completed team quicker.
Very generous with Weitering there
Bit under on Dea based on NAB form too
Quote from: fanTCfool on March 17, 2016, 09:07:30 PM
Quote from: Big Mac on March 17, 2016, 08:54:34 PM
Quote from: MC on March 17, 2016, 04:11:21 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on March 17, 2016, 03:21:58 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 03:06:21 PM
S.Martin+Weitering+Oliver v Gawn+Dea+B.Crouch
Gawn, Dea and B.Crouch ........comfortably
Not sure 'comfortably' is the right word...
Martin 110-115 > Gawn 105-110 (+5)
Weitering 80 > Dea 65 (+15)
Oliver 75 < Crouch 95 (-20)
Looks pretty even overall to me, though option #1 will arguably make more cash and help you to have a completed team quicker.
Very generous with Weitering there
Bit under on Dea based on NAB form too
Weitering and Dea could easy average the same, 75ish for both?
Quote from: dmac07 on March 17, 2016, 09:14:01 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on March 17, 2016, 09:07:30 PM
Quote from: Big Mac on March 17, 2016, 08:54:34 PM
Quote from: MC on March 17, 2016, 04:11:21 PM
Quote from: nostradamus on March 17, 2016, 03:21:58 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 03:06:21 PM
S.Martin+Weitering+Oliver v Gawn+Dea+B.Crouch
Gawn, Dea and B.Crouch ........comfortably
Not sure 'comfortably' is the right word...
Martin 110-115 > Gawn 105-110 (+5)
Weitering 80 > Dea 65 (+15)
Oliver 75 < Crouch 95 (-20)
Looks pretty even overall to me, though option #1 will arguably make more cash and help you to have a completed team quicker.
Very generous with Weitering there
Bit under on Dea based on NAB form too
Weitering and Dea could easy average the same, 75ish for both?
I'd say that's reasonable, give or take 5 on both
D4/F3
Shaw, Laird, Smith, ________, Dea, Tippa (Hartley, Ruggles)
Barlow, Greene, _______, Wells, B.Kennedy, Kerridge (M.Brown, Komner)
Weitering and A.Hall
vs
Bartel and Milera/ other sub 200k fwd (Menadue is in my mids)
Hall v Greene
mitch robinson vs sam gray ?
Quote from: tttt on March 17, 2016, 09:40:34 PM
mitch robinson vs sam gray ?
Was just doing some reading up on Mitch Robinson and I'm seriously considering him now, with both Redden and Beams gone he could go big... Averaged something like 110 in the latter half of last year with similar injuries I believe
Shaw/Weitering/Dea vs Simpson/B.Smith/Broad
Quote from: TomK on March 17, 2016, 09:50:15 PM
Shaw/Weitering/Dea vs Simpson/B.Smith/Broad
Option 1
Lonergan or Seedsman?
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 17, 2016, 09:52:44 PM
Quote from: TomK on March 17, 2016, 09:50:15 PM
Shaw/Weitering/Dea vs Simpson/B.Smith/Broad
Option 1
It's tough cause I really want Shaw but the 2nd option gives me two keepers. :-\
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 17, 2016, 09:52:44 PM
Lonergan or Seedsman?
Lonergan just cause of his midfield role
Macmillan vs Johanisen
POD vs hyped up player
Quote from: TexR74 on March 17, 2016, 10:05:45 PM
Macmillan vs Johanisen
POD vs hyped up player
I don't like either but if I had to choose it would be Macmillan
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 09:42:41 PM
Quote from: tttt on March 17, 2016, 09:40:34 PM
mitch robinson vs sam gray ?
Was just doing some reading up on Mitch Robinson and I'm seriously considering him now, with both Redden and Beams gone he could go big... Averaged something like 110 in the latter half of last year with similar injuries I believe
just worried he may go get himself suspended :(
Quote from: tttt on March 17, 2016, 10:25:17 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 17, 2016, 09:42:41 PM
Quote from: tttt on March 17, 2016, 09:40:34 PM
mitch robinson vs sam gray ?
Was just doing some reading up on Mitch Robinson and I'm seriously considering him now, with both Redden and Beams gone he could go big... Averaged something like 110 in the latter half of last year with similar injuries I believe
just worried he may go get himself suspended :(
It'd be a pretty big gamble, but you'd have to take the mentality he's grown up and erased the brain farts that cause him to miss games haha I've almost talked myself into him
Rance vs Houli vs Laird??
I've got Rance > Laird > Houli
But all pretty tight
Rich vs Lonergan + cash ..D3 up for grabs
Rich is almost definitely going to get injured at some point right? If most people agree that is going to happen, why would you select him? I know lonergan is also an injury risk, so my previous point was more to rule rich out entirely as an option..
Quote from: piesfan1989 on March 18, 2016, 12:55:40 AM
Rich is almost definitely going to get injured at some point right? If most people agree that is going to happen, why would you select him? I know lonergan is also an injury risk, so my previous point was more to rule rich out entirely as an option..
Yeah he's missing rounds 4, 7, and 12 from what I've heard
Quote from: freddo81 on March 17, 2016, 11:18:58 PM
Rance vs Houli vs Laird??
Laird>Houli>Rance with Yarran not in the frame.
Nic Nat vs Gawn ?
Quote from: GoLions on March 18, 2016, 02:04:27 AM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on March 18, 2016, 12:55:40 AM
Rich is almost definitely going to get injured at some point right? If most people agree that is going to happen, why would you select him? I know lonergan is also an injury risk, so my previous point was more to rule rich out entirely as an option..
Yeah he's missing rounds 4, 7, and 12 from what I've heard
Will also be subbed off in round 16
Quote from: Big Mac on March 18, 2016, 02:28:27 AM
Quote from: GoLions on March 18, 2016, 02:04:27 AM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on March 18, 2016, 12:55:40 AM
Rich is almost definitely going to get injured at some point right? If most people agree that is going to happen, why would you select him? I know lonergan is also an injury risk, so my previous point was more to rule rich out entirely as an option..
Yeah he's missing rounds 4, 7, and 12 from what I've heard
Will also be subbed off in round 16
Think Round 20 he said he had a mate's wedding as well.
Quote from: MajorLazer on March 18, 2016, 02:29:55 AM
Quote from: Big Mac on March 18, 2016, 02:28:27 AM
Quote from: GoLions on March 18, 2016, 02:04:27 AM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on March 18, 2016, 12:55:40 AM
Rich is almost definitely going to get injured at some point right? If most people agree that is going to happen, why would you select him? I know lonergan is also an injury risk, so my previous point was more to rule rich out entirely as an option..
Yeah he's missing rounds 4, 7, and 12 from what I've heard
Will also be subbed off in round 16
Think Round 20 he said he had a mate's wedding as well.
Yeah, Rocky's dog Killa is getting married then iirc. We'll be playing our reserves team that week.
Goldy/laird/T McKenzie/McCarthy + $27k vs. Nicnat/bartel/Rich/Oliver
Priddis vs R. Gray??
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 18, 2016, 06:36:46 AM
Goldy/laird/T McKenzie/McCarthy + $27k vs. Nicnat/bartel/Rich/Oliver
Option number 2 please Eddie! Rather Goldy over NicNat, Bartel over Laird, Rich over Cannon and Oliver over McCarthy. All close ish except Cannon, Rich 10 times outta 10 over him.
Quote from: freddo81 on March 18, 2016, 07:54:14 AM
Priddis vs R. Gray??
Priddis for consistency, Gray for POD (Priddis 12%, Gray 7% so not much in it).
Fyfe + Weits vs Pendles + Seedsman?
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 18, 2016, 10:02:46 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 18, 2016, 06:36:46 AM
Goldy/laird/T McKenzie/McCarthy + $27k vs. Nicnat/bartel/Rich/Oliver
Option number 2 please Eddie! Rather Goldy over NicNat, Bartel over Laird, Rich over Cannon and Oliver over McCarthy. All close ish except Cannon, Rich 10 times outta 10 over him.
Quote from: freddo81 on March 18, 2016, 07:54:14 AM
Priddis vs R. Gray??
Priddis for consistency, Gray for POD (Priddis 12%, Gray 7% so not much in it).
Fyfe + Weits vs Pendles + Seedsman?
Probably option 1
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 18, 2016, 10:08:00 AM
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 18, 2016, 10:02:46 AM
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 18, 2016, 06:36:46 AM
Goldy/laird/T McKenzie/McCarthy + $27k vs. Nicnat/bartel/Rich/Oliver
Option number 2 please Eddie! Rather Goldy over NicNat, Bartel over Laird, Rich over Cannon and Oliver over McCarthy. All close ish except Cannon, Rich 10 times outta 10 over him.
Quote from: freddo81 on March 18, 2016, 07:54:14 AM
Priddis vs R. Gray??
Priddis for consistency, Gray for POD (Priddis 12%, Gray 7% so not much in it).
Fyfe + Weits vs Pendles + Seedsman?
Probably option 1
Option 1 - Fyfe > Pendles and Weits better for cash generation that Seedyman
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 18, 2016, 06:36:46 AM
Goldy/laird/T McKenzie/McCarthy + $27k vs. Nicnat/bartel/Rich/Oliver
Option one mate, as long as it's Geelong's McCarthy not GWS!
S.Gray/McCarthy/NicNat v De Goey/Oliver/Martin + 60k (with no where really to spend it)
Rockcliff vs D.Shiel?
Does rocky have a dodgy hammy?
Quote from: freddo81 on March 18, 2016, 07:54:14 AM
Priddis vs R. Gray??
Priddis - just gets the job done
Greene (GWS) vs Buddy vs Hall
Not sure if I'm willing to ride the Buddy rollercoaster this year! Greene could go big early?? Thoughts??
Quote from: freddo81 on March 18, 2016, 11:42:59 AM
Greene (GWS) vs Buddy vs Hall
Not sure if I'm willing to ride the Buddy rollercoaster this year! Greene could go big early?? Thoughts??
Buddy man. Hall could be ok, but I'm still not sure what impact GAJ and Prestia will have on his output. Both over Greene imo
Houli + Mcarthy/Milera vs Bartel + Bkennedy
Quote from: Mahogany on March 18, 2016, 12:02:13 PM
Houli + Mcarthy/Milera vs Bartel + Bkennedy
Bartel + Bennedy
Houli can have up and down seasons, if Bartel remains healthy he should average 95-100, and Bennedy seems like he will relish playing at the demons.
Shaw + Lonergan + Weitering vs Bartel + Rich + Harwood
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 18, 2016, 12:26:44 PM
Shaw + Lonergan + Weitering vs Bartel + Rich + Harwood
A
Quote from: Keith Urban on March 18, 2016, 12:11:25 PM
Quote from: Mahogany on March 18, 2016, 12:02:13 PM
Houli + Mcarthy/Milera vs Bartel + Bkennedy
Bartel + Bennedy
Houli can have up and down seasons, if Bartel remains healthy he should average 95-100, and Bennedy seems like he will relish playing at the demons.
This
Quote from: Keith Urban on March 18, 2016, 11:07:41 AM
S.Gray/McCarthy/NicNat v De Goey/Oliver/Martin + 60k (with no where really to spend it)
Option no.1 but not much in it really. NicNat>Martin, SGray=DeGoey, Oliver>McCarthy... If you've got nowhere to spend the cash then go with whoever you think will get you more points out of Nat and Martin.
Quote from: vtaced on March 18, 2016, 11:11:11 AM
Rockcliff vs D.Shiel?
Does rocky have a dodgy hammy?
News to me... would still go Rocky :P
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 18, 2016, 12:26:44 PM
Shaw + Lonergan + Weitering vs Bartel + Rich + Harwood
Option no. 2 for me, but it's less trades certainty. I would take it because Bartel will be a keeper, and Rich might be, whereas in the first choice Shaw will be a keeper but I'm less convinced Loergan will be - but I know plenty will say otherwise.
Broad Shiel Menadue vs Weitering Libba Mills
Thoughts please, Midfield is v.strong, Backs are light,
Backs currently .... Shaw, Smith, Emac, Hartley, Broad, Adams - Tippa, Ruggles
Mids currently have Rocky at M6
Just don't know if upgrading broad to weits really strengthens me ?
Quote from: hawkboy80 on March 18, 2016, 01:32:53 PM
Broad Shiel Menadue vs Weitering Libba Mills
Thoughts please, Midfield is v.strong, Backs are light,
Backs currently .... Shaw, Smith, Emac, Hartley, Broad, Adams - Tippa, Ruggles
Mids currently have Rocky at M6
Just don't know if upgrading broad to weits really strengthens me ?
Weitering Libba Mills
Fantastic value in Libba at his price as he could potentially average 105, not sure shiel is a certainty to go 110+ which is what your looking for, Mills seems to be a lock with the lack of reliable mid rookies around (try find a way to fit menadue in as well)
could potentially go weitering to broad and spend the 100k somewhere else (maybe upgrade smith to a laird/houli type), maybe pick up oliver or strengthen other lines
D4/F3
Shaw, Laird, Smith, ________, Dea, Tippa (Hartley, Ruggles)
Barlow, Greene, _______, Wells, B.Kennedy, Kerridge (M.Brown, Komner)
Weitering and A.Hall
vs
Bartel and Milera/ other sub 200k fwd (Menadue is in my mids)
Quote from: dmac07 on March 18, 2016, 02:01:36 PM
D4/F3
Shaw, Laird, Smith, ________, Dea, Tippa (Hartley, Ruggles)
Barlow, Greene, _______, Wells, B.Kennedy, Kerridge (M.Brown, Komner)
Weitering and A.Hall
vs
Bartel and Milera/ other sub 200k fwd (Menadue is in my mids)
Option 2
Quote from: mzunguman on March 18, 2016, 02:06:23 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 18, 2016, 02:01:36 PM
D4/F3
Shaw, Laird, Smith, ________, Dea, Tippa (Hartley, Ruggles)
Barlow, Greene, _______, Wells, B.Kennedy, Kerridge (M.Brown, Komner)
Weitering and A.Hall
vs
Bartel and Milera/ other sub 200k fwd (Menadue is in my mids)
Option 2
Houli/Laird + Gawn v Bartel + Martin
Goldy and Oliver vs Gawn and B.Crouch?
Martin is my other ruck regardless.
Probably been asked elsewhere but...
Gaz v Dangerfield?
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on March 18, 2016, 03:21:17 PM
Goldy and Oliver vs Gawn and B.Crouch?
Martin is my other ruck regardless.
Big Maxxy and Crouch
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on March 18, 2016, 03:21:17 PM
Goldy and Oliver vs Gawn and B.Crouch?
Martin is my other ruck regardless.
Goldy + Oliver
Quote from: monga77 on March 18, 2016, 03:31:19 PM
Probably been asked elsewhere but...
Gaz v Dangerfield?
Danger
Quote from: monga77 on March 18, 2016, 03:31:19 PM
Probably been asked elsewhere but...
Gaz v Dangerfield?
work out a way to get both in
Lids VS the rest
For D3 + M7/8
Lonergan + B Crouch vs Bartel + Oliver (already have Mills)
Pendlebury & L.McCarthy OR Liberatore & A.Hall ??
Parker/Wingard/Rich vs JPK/Greene/Bartel
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 18, 2016, 06:12:03 PM
Parker/Wingard/Rich vs JPK/Greene/Bartel
I would almost be inclined to go Parker, Greene and Bartel!
Dahlhaus vs Montagna?
Not worried about the price difference
Weitering and Jelwood v Libba and JJ
Quote from: jfitty on March 18, 2016, 10:44:40 PM
Dahlhaus vs Montagna?
Not worried about the price difference
Dahl probably the better starting pick
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 18, 2016, 11:41:27 PM
Weitering and Jelwood v Libba and JJ
Gotta start Libba still, but I'm not a big fan of JJ
Jelwood + Milera v Dalhaus + Mills
Quote from: jfitty on March 18, 2016, 10:44:40 PM
Dahlhaus vs Montagna?
Not worried about the price difference
Montagna for me.
Quote from: mzunguman on March 18, 2016, 11:44:32 PM
Jelwood + Milera v Dalhaus + Mills
Option 1, but only just I reckon.
Danger, S Gray, D Menzel, Bennedy
Vs
Jelwood, Ward, De Goey, Petracca
Heath Shaw and Mills
v
Harwood and Jelwood
Oliver and kennedy or gresham and wells?
The 3 posts above
Option 2
Option 1
Option 2
Best forward sub 550k? Or am I better off finding the extra cash for a Dahlhaus or dusty?
Assuming both named R1... Grimley v McCarthy for fwd cover
Quote from: Bubbles on March 19, 2016, 11:08:23 AM
Best forward sub 550k? Or am I better off finding the extra cash for a Dahlhaus or dusty?
Barlow
Danger v Jelwood, hope to have by seasons end but just to start with..
Barlow v Bennell v Robinson v Greene?? Keep swapping between these 4. Can only have 1.
J.Steele vs M.Crouch already have Brad
Buddy, De Goey + 30k v Danger, Milera
Quote from: Hagebear on March 19, 2016, 12:03:23 PM
Barlow v Bennell v Robinson v Greene?? Keep swapping between these 4. Can only have 1.
Barlow by a long way over the rest for me
Quote from: _wato on March 19, 2016, 12:55:51 PM
Buddy, De Goey + 30k v Danger, Milera
Danger/Milera. Danger should be in the top few mids, don't think you can say the same for Buddy. Milera looks classy, won't need a lot of the pill to score decent imo just hope he gets enough games early.
De Goey vs Jack Steele
Both look set for big improvement, not sure I want to run with both.
I think Steele will get more opportunity in the midfield to be honest.
M. Crouch + Cripps vs B. Crouch + Jelwood?
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 19, 2016, 02:30:18 PM
I think Steele will get more opportunity in the midfield to be honest.
M. Crouch + Cripps vs B. Crouch + Jelwood?
Brad and Joel no question
Personally would go Cripps and Brad Crouch.
C Oliver v B Kennedy
Quote from: Bubbles on March 19, 2016, 11:08:23 AM
Best forward sub 550k? Or am I better off finding the extra cash for a Dahlhaus or dusty?
Barlow is the obvious answer here. The next best picks are probably Hall and Gray, great value.
Quote from: almonds on March 19, 2016, 12:00:19 PM
Danger v Jelwood, hope to have by seasons end but just to start with..
If you are guaranteed to end up with both, it makes sense to start the undervalued Selwood, compared to Danger at his career-high price, however I feel Danger is going to pump out some monster scores early, and I would be leaning towards starting him.
Quote from: Hagebear on March 19, 2016, 12:03:23 PM
Barlow v Bennell v Robinson v Greene?? Keep swapping between these 4. Can only have 1.
Barlow by a mile. Robinson will be a good POD, especially with Beams out for a while. Greene looks like a good value pick. I wouldn't consider Bennell.
Quote from: sidvicious on March 19, 2016, 12:24:00 PM
J.Steele vs M.Crouch already have Brad
Neither. If I was to choose one, I'd take Crouch.
Quote from: _wato on March 19, 2016, 12:55:51 PM
Buddy, De Goey + 30k v Danger, Milera
Danger and Milera. Not that sold on Milera. I feel like cheaper options will average similarly.
Quote from: PiPies on March 19, 2016, 01:28:15 PM
De Goey vs Jack Steele
Both look set for big improvement, not sure I want to run with both.
Neither, but De Goey if I had to pick one.
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 19, 2016, 02:30:18 PM
I think Steele will get more opportunity in the midfield to be honest.
M. Crouch + Cripps vs B. Crouch + Jelwood?
Brad + Jelly every day mate!
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 19, 2016, 02:44:35 PM
Personally would go Cripps and Brad Crouch.
C Oliver v B Kennedy
Kennedy.
Kennedy + NicNat vs. McCarthy/Kommer + Stef Martin?
Quote from: BomberSam on March 19, 2016, 02:52:53 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 19, 2016, 02:44:35 PM
Personally would go Cripps and Brad Crouch.
C Oliver v B Kennedy
Kennedy.
Kennedy + NicNat vs. McCarthy/Kommer + Stef Martin?
Kennedy + NicNat
NicNat vs. Gawn?
A: Jesse Lonergan + Tom Liberatore/Matt Crouch + Toby Greene
or....
B: Daniel Rich + Connor Menadue + Luke Dahlhaus
Quote from: Sven on March 19, 2016, 03:59:42 PM
A: Jesse Lonergan + Tom Liberatore/Matt Crouch + Toby Greene
or....
B: Daniel Rich + Connor Menadue + Luke Dahlhaus
Option A.
Weitering + Dea vs Harwood + Broad
Rance v Houli?
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 19, 2016, 02:44:35 PM
Personally would go Cripps and Brad Crouch.
C Oliver v B Kennedy
Oliver.
Shaw, Crouch and Lonergan VS Bartel, Pendlebury and Hartley (rookie def starting)
Quote from: mzunguman on March 19, 2016, 07:07:41 PM
Rance v Houli?
Deciding between the same 2, liking Houli more though
Shaw (D1), Mills (M7), Buddy (F3) + $104k
V
Houli (D2), Cripps (M5), De Goey (F3) + $40k
I just have a feeling Cripps is going to explode, he appears to have grown another 2 inches over the off season. Plus Buddy worries me, and I think DeGoey may match his output.
hannerebery and lonergan vs crouch and shaw
Quote from: almonds on March 20, 2016, 12:25:50 AM
hannerebery and lonergan vs crouch and shaw
Hannebery and lonergan
Lyons & Jelwood V Danger & B. Kennedy
probably been done to death but...
Weitering vs Dea
Quote from: jfitty on March 19, 2016, 09:46:08 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 19, 2016, 07:07:41 PM
Rance v Houli?
Deciding between the same 2, liking Houli more though
I feel like Rance had far less deviation in his scores last year, but it was the first really good year he had. Compared to Houli with more deviation but he's been very consistent for multiple years! Hard one
Quote from: HotTiges on March 20, 2016, 12:35:06 AM
probably been done to death but...
Weitering vs Dea
Weitering for JS.
A) Weitering, Fyfe and B. Crouch
B) Weitering, Pendles and M. Crouch
C) Seedsman, Pendles and B. Crouch
Hall vs Rich via D/F swing
Quote from: billnats on March 20, 2016, 11:17:13 AM
A) Weitering, Fyfe and B. Crouch
B) Weitering, Pendles and M. Crouch
C) Seedsman, Pendles and B. Crouch
A
mills vs oliver
&
weitering vs dea
&
bennedy vs milera
Am I better with Dea in my back line or Kennedy in the forwards? This decision is the final piece in the puzzle and I'm set to go. Cheers people :)
Quote from: Mondoftw on March 20, 2016, 12:53:41 PM
Am I better with Dea in my back line or Kennedy in the forwards? This decision is the final piece in the puzzle and I'm set to go. Cheers people :)
Both
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 20, 2016, 01:51:16 PM
Quote from: Mondoftw on March 20, 2016, 12:53:41 PM
Am I better with Dea in my back line or Kennedy in the forwards? This decision is the final piece in the puzzle and I'm set to go. Cheers people :)
Both
Quote from: jeesh on March 20, 2016, 12:10:45 PM
mills vs oliver
&
weitering vs dea
&
bennedy vs milera
Mills, Weits, Kennedy
Hall vs Zerret
priddis v hanners
Gibson vs Birchall
A) Lonergan, Pendles & Parker
B) Seedsman, Fyfe & Parker
C) Weitering, Fyfe & Pendles
Quote from: Rodi on March 20, 2016, 02:08:14 PM
Gibson vs Birchall
I would go Gibson
Quote from: almonds on March 20, 2016, 01:54:08 PM
priddis v hanners
Priddis
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 20, 2016, 01:53:55 PM
Hall vs Zerret
Cant go wrong with either but i am slightly leaning towards Hall
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
How about Martin (F1) + Oliver (M8)
VS
Hall (F2) + Lonergan (D5) [Done through BKennedy to Mid and Adams to Fwd]
I have a couple, here they are:
Dea and Kommer vs Kennedy and Broad (117k def)
and
Selwood and Pendles vs Shiel and Danger - leaning towards the second option. Cheers
Quote from: Hawker_08 on March 20, 2016, 02:19:10 PM
I have a couple, here they are:
Dea and Kommer vs Kennedy and Broad (117k def)
and
Selwood and Pendles vs Shiel and Danger - leaning towards the second option. Cheers
Dont like Kommer or Broad- try to get BenK and Dea (but if hands are tied Option 1, Broad wont play)
and
Option 1 for me, very solid given scoring history. Shiel will still be very up and down.
Would appreciate feedback on my question earlier :)
Greene (f3) vs Hall (f3)
Zerret vs Greene vs Buddy
Simpson and Gawn vs seedsman and Goldy
gawn vs nicnat for R2 ?
Quote from: tttt on March 20, 2016, 05:23:27 PM
gawn vs nicnat for R2 ?
Tough one but Gawn has the soft draw.
De Goey vs Steele
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 20, 2016, 05:40:09 PM
De Goey vs Steele
Steele for sure
Dusty + Blicavs vs Yeo + Goldstein (DPP shower for Dusty+Yeo)
Pendlebury vs Dangerfield
shaw birchall weiters
vs
houli gibson harwood
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 20, 2016, 07:17:47 PM
shaw birchall weiters
vs
houli gibson harwood
I would pick the top option but I think there are better options than Birch, he's on a downward trajectory and has been for 4 years.
Quote from: Bully on March 20, 2016, 07:24:49 PM
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 20, 2016, 07:17:47 PM
shaw birchall weiters
vs
houli gibson harwood
I would pick the top option but I think there are better options than Birch, he's on a downward trajectory and has been for 4 years.
yeah just battling for dollars atm
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 20, 2016, 07:26:40 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 20, 2016, 07:24:49 PM
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 20, 2016, 07:17:47 PM
shaw birchall weiters
vs
houli gibson harwood
I would pick the top option but I think there are better options than Birch, he's on a downward trajectory and has been for 4 years.
yeah just battling for dollars atm
I think both Smith & Rich will do just as well and they are cheaper.
Rich and Dusty
v
Lonergan and Montagna
SIMPSON AND GAWN V SEEDSMAN AND GOLDY
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 20, 2016, 08:17:29 PM
SIMPSON AND GAWN V SEEDSMAN AND GOLDY
Simpson and gawn outscore the other two but would do everything to get goldy in.
Joel Selwood + Shaw vs Ablett + Bartel/Rich
Quote from: lucky on March 20, 2016, 08:36:53 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 20, 2016, 08:17:29 PM
SIMPSON AND GAWN V SEEDSMAN AND GOLDY
Simpson and gawn outscore the other two but would do everything to get goldy in.
Joel Selwood + Shaw vs Ablett + Bartel/Rich
Ablett and Bartel! :)
NicNat + Shiel vs. SMartin + Wines?
Ablett and Degoey VS Pendles and Steele
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 09:40:43 PM
NicNat + Shiel vs. SMartin + Wines?
If possible, can I please get opinions from a few people?
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 10:04:48 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 09:40:43 PM
NicNat + Shiel vs. SMartin + Wines?
If possible, can I please get opinions from a few people?
I'd go Nicnat and Shiel. Just a gut feeling that Shiel will have a massive year. Nicnat and Stef should be about the same, so may as well go Nicnat cause of cash saved.
Thanks for the responses.
What about NicNat vs. Gawn?
Quote from: GoLions on March 20, 2016, 10:06:01 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 10:04:48 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 09:40:43 PM
NicNat + Shiel vs. SMartin + Wines?
If possible, can I please get opinions from a few people?
I'd go Nicnat and Shiel. Just a gut feeling that Shiel will have a massive year. Nicnat and Stef should be about the same, so may as well go Nicnat cause of cash saved.
Shiel is still untested against the hard tag, with Treloar now gone and Griffen slowing down expect all the attention to to be heaped on Shiel. Way too risky for mine.
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 10:20:16 PM
Thanks for the responses.
What about NicNat vs. Gawn?
NN
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 10:20:16 PM
Thanks for the responses.
What about NicNat vs. Gawn?
Gawn
NN has Sandi twice, Jacobs twice, Hawthorn twice, Stefan Martin twice & Grundy twice. The last time he met these opponents his scores were 77, 75, 64, 83 & 100. That's 10 games that won't be easy, can't see him pulling another 114 season.
Quote from: Bully on March 20, 2016, 10:21:03 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 20, 2016, 10:06:01 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 10:04:48 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 09:40:43 PM
NicNat + Shiel vs. SMartin + Wines?
If possible, can I please get opinions from a few people?
I'd go Nicnat and Shiel. Just a gut feeling that Shiel will have a massive year. Nicnat and Stef should be about the same, so may as well go Nicnat cause of cash saved.
Shiel is still untested against the hard tag, with Treloar now gone and Griffen slowing down expect all the attention to to be heaped on Shiel. Way too risky for mine.
Like I said, just a gut feeling. Have absolutely nothing to back it up :P
Hanners and priddis vs danger and selwood/jpk/ward/r gray??
Already have Fyfe, Rocky and Ablett
Quote from: aces-high on March 20, 2016, 10:50:43 PM
Hanners and priddis vs danger and selwood/jpk/ward/r gray??
Already have Fyfe, Rocky and Ablett
Danger and Jelwood
pick 2 of oliver vs simpkin vs jack steele
Quote from: YoungGun on March 20, 2016, 11:15:09 PM
pick 2 of oliver vs simpkin vs jack steele
Oliver and Steele
Mackenzie vs Sheridan
Barlow v Bennell
Jpk vs selwood. Both guns.
NN, Cripps and DeGoey vs Goldy, Oliver and Greene
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2016, 12:12:09 AM
NN, Cripps and DeGoey vs Goldy, Oliver and Greene
option 1...just
mine is..
KK, Shiel, Sam Gray
vs
Rich, Cripps, Dusty
currently using option 1
Quote from: BomberSam on March 20, 2016, 11:47:05 PM
Quote from: TexR74 on March 20, 2016, 11:35:28 PM
Mackenzie vs Sheridan
Sheridan.
Quote from: dicey7 on March 20, 2016, 11:42:55 PM
Barlow v Bennell
Barlow easily.
Quote from: aces-high on March 20, 2016, 11:43:32 PM
Jpk vs selwood. Both guns.
JPK on the basis of a full pre-season.
Agreed.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2016, 12:12:09 AM
NN, Cripps and DeGoey vs Goldy, Oliver and Greene
Option 2 for me, seems more likely for 2 keepers, though I don't rate Oliver that highly to be honest.
Quote from: HotTiges on March 21, 2016, 12:34:41 AM
mine is..
KK, Shiel, Sam Gray
vs
Rich, Cripps, Dusty
currently using option 1
Yep, option 1.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2016, 12:12:09 AM
NN, Cripps and DeGoey vs Goldy, Oliver and Greene
Nn 110 Cripps 110 de goey 85
305
Goldy 125 Oliver 75 Greene 90
290
For balance sake I'd go the top one because I see Cripps as a keeper over Greene and de goey with more growth then Oliver
Quote from: aces-high on March 21, 2016, 02:27:28 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2016, 12:12:09 AM
NN, Cripps and DeGoey vs Goldy, Oliver and Greene
Nn 110 Cripps 110 de goey 85
305
Goldy 125 Oliver 75 Greene 90
290
For balance sake I'd go the top one because I see Cripps as a keeper over Greene and de goey with more growth then Oliver
cripps 110? That makes him a top 10 mid. I don't think he will be that high.
For me its NN 105 Cripps 95 and De Goey 80
280
Goldy 120 Oliver 70 Greene 85
275
Option 1... just but Goldy is a captain option.
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 21, 2016, 03:05:22 AM
Quote from: aces-high on March 21, 2016, 02:27:28 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2016, 12:12:09 AM
NN, Cripps and DeGoey vs Goldy, Oliver and Greene
Nn 110 Cripps 110 de goey 85
305
Goldy 125 Oliver 75 Greene 90
290
For balance sake I'd go the top one because I see Cripps as a keeper over Greene and de goey with more growth then Oliver
cripps 110? That makes him a top 10 mid. I don't think he will be that high.
For me its NN 105 Cripps 95 and De Goey 80
280
Goldy 120 Oliver 70 Greene 85
275
Option 1... just but Goldy is a captain option.
Considering Cripps averaged 96 last year in 20 games I think he'll improve to 105+ comfortably which puts him in the top 20 Mids. Nicnat is a top 3 ruck and de goey is a breakout contender that'll make you 150+ cash whilst averaging 80+. Much more upside in that Imo
Weitering & Oliver vs B. Crouch & Broad?
Quote from: tommy10 on March 21, 2016, 12:12:09 AM
NN, Cripps and DeGoey vs Goldy, Oliver and Greene
2
Cripps Vs Wines?
Quote from: MontyJnr on March 21, 2016, 09:07:33 AM
Weitering & Oliver vs B. Crouch & Broad?
Option 1 - I don't think Broad will play straight away, however i don't rate Oliver that well either. I'd try to find a way to fit B Crouch in.
Bennell/Dahlhaus v Aaron Hall + $138k
Quote from: Bubbles on March 21, 2016, 10:04:41 AM
Bennell/Dahlhaus v Aaron Hall + $138k
Aaron Hall + $138k
Shaw&Lonergan vs Laird&Gibson
Quote from: Raiden on March 21, 2016, 09:55:37 AM
Cripps Vs Wines?
Wines fairly comfortably. Carlton will still get belted this year, having offloaded most of their experienced blokes.
Quote from: Bubbles on March 21, 2016, 10:04:41 AM
Bennell/Dahlhaus v Aaron Hall + $138k
Take a punt on Hall if the cash can be effectively used elsewhere. Dahl > Bennell otherwise.
Quote from: Huttabito on March 21, 2016, 12:30:01 PM
Shaw&Lonergan vs Laird&Gibson
Laird & Gibson will both be keepers, though if you could pick someone else around Gibson's price i'd be happier.
Danger & Laird vs Shiel and Heater
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on March 21, 2016, 02:45:44 PM
Danger & Laird vs Shiel and Heater
Danger & Laird for me. Both will be top 5 in their positions, whereas Shiel might suffer without Treloar to back him up - he showed last year he was prone to being tagged completely out of games.
Robinson v Hall (+50k)
Bartel vs Gibson vs Houli?
Sheridan/Goldy v Houli/Gawn?
Robbo + Weitering vs Hall + Harwood
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on March 21, 2016, 05:20:13 PM
Sheridan/Goldy v Houli/Gawn?
Houli/Gawn but try to find the cash for Goldy.
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 21, 2016, 05:38:11 PM
Robbo + Weitering vs Hall + Harwood
I like Hall + Harwood, but you need good cover on your DEF bench
Hurn vs Hall
T. Greene vs A. Hall vs Z. Merrett
B.Crouch/A.Hall V Dahlhaus/B.Kennedy
Quote from: Bubbles on March 21, 2016, 07:02:19 PM
B.Crouch/A.Hall V Dahlhaus/B.Kennedy
Option 1 easily.
Harwood + Green vs. Bartel + De Goey (or) Steele?
Quote from: JonH3 on March 21, 2016, 07:13:43 PM
Harwood + Green vs. Bartel + De Goey (or) Steele?
Bartel and De Goey
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 21, 2016, 07:34:54 PM
Quote from: JonH3 on March 21, 2016, 07:13:43 PM
Harwood + Greene vs. Bartel + De Goey (or) Steele?
Bartel vs De Goey
What's the hype on De Goey if you dont mind me asking?
And would it be still Bartel and De Goey if it was opposed to
Greene and J. Lonergan?
Quote from: Bubbles on March 21, 2016, 07:02:19 PM
B.Crouch/A.Hall V Dahlhaus/B.Kennedy
Option 1!
R.Gray and Weitering vs B.Crouch and Rich
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 21, 2016, 09:31:43 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 21, 2016, 07:02:19 PM
B.Crouch/A.Hall V Dahlhaus/B.Kennedy
Option 1!
R.Gray and Weitering vs B.Crouch and Rich
If crouch is named hes locked for mine. I also have weitering though so... haha
Wines and Greene VS Parker and S.Gray
Quote from: JonH3 on March 21, 2016, 08:41:23 PM
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 21, 2016, 07:34:54 PM
Quote from: JonH3 on March 21, 2016, 07:13:43 PM
Harwood + Greene vs. Bartel + De Goey (or) Steele?
Bartel vs De Goey
What's the hype on De Goey if you dont mind me asking?
And would it be still Bartel and De Goey if it was opposed to Greene and J. Lonergan?
Yeah i meant that hahahaa
Harwood + Mills v Libba + def rookie (to make it 3 rookies on field)
Have DeGeiy but not sokd on the hype as Pies midfield runs deep interestedin thoughts on Hrovat
Quote from: dosstheboss on March 21, 2016, 10:12:43 PM
Harwood + Mills v Libba + def rookie (to make it 3 rookies on field)
Libba + Dea
Hall, Shaw, Z.Smith, Danger, Weitering vs Bartel, Lonergan, B.Crouch, Dusty, Stef Martin
Quote from: supercoachhelp on March 22, 2016, 10:13:29 AM
Hall, Shaw, Z.Smith, Danger, Weitering vs Bartel, Lonergan, B.Crouch, Dusty, Stef Martin
2nd option with Bartel just.
1st option 2 keepers, 1 potential keeper, 1 stepping stone mid pricer, 1 rookie VS 3 keepers and 2 mid pricers.
More safety net going for 2nd option
Bartel and Priddis VS Shaw and Hall.
Anyone?
Bartel and Priddis
Shaw and Milera vs Laird and B Crouch
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 22, 2016, 11:55:21 AM
Bartel and Priddis
Shaw and Milera vs Laird and B Crouch
Laird & B.Crouch
Pendles & NN & 10k vs Danger & Gawn & No cash left
Sheradin, Dea, Leuenberger, Marcon VS Broad, Ruggles, Mumford, Menadue???
Bartel + Weitering + B.Kennedy
v
Seedsman + Lonergan + B.Kennedy
v
Lonergan + Harwood + Weitering
Quote from: Holz on March 22, 2016, 01:08:46 PM
Bartel + Weitering + B.Kennedy
v
Seedsman + Lonergan + B.Kennedy
v
Lonergan + Harwood + Weitering
1st option, it gives you a keeper at least
Wines + Bennedy vs. Selwood/Ward/Shiel/T-Mitch + McCarthy?
Quote from: Holz on March 22, 2016, 01:08:46 PM
Bartel + Weitering + B.Kennedy
v
Seedsman + Lonergan + B.Kennedy
v
Lonergan + Harwood + Weitering
1st option for sure
Quote from: BomberSam on March 22, 2016, 01:13:10 PM
Wines + Bennedy vs. Selwood/Ward/Shiel/T-Mitch + McCarthy?
Wines + Bennedy. But try and find extra cash to get Selwood for Wines
Quote from: tommy10 on March 22, 2016, 03:03:53 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 22, 2016, 01:13:10 PM
Wines + Bennedy vs. Selwood/Ward/Shiel/T-Mitch + McCarthy?
Wines + Bennedy. But try and find extra cash to get Selwood for Wines
That was the point of the X vs. Y... Only other option is Libba to Crouch.
Quote from: BomberSam on March 22, 2016, 03:15:31 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 22, 2016, 03:03:53 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 22, 2016, 01:13:10 PM
Wines + Bennedy vs. Selwood/Ward/Shiel/T-Mitch + McCarthy?
Wines + Bennedy. But try and find extra cash to get Selwood for Wines
That was the point of the X vs. Y... Only other option is Libba to Crouch.
option D
Crouch + McCarthy then use the 270k in defence
Priddis vs Pendels?
Jelwood + Menadue (Oliver at M9) or Dusty + Oliver (Menadue at M9)
Quote from: _wato on March 22, 2016, 05:36:59 PM
Jelwood + Menadue (Oliver at M9) or Dusty + Oliver (Menadue at M9)
Do you have Danger? I reckon option 2, Oliver too much for m9.
Laird and Lonergan (d4) or Wines and Lonergan (d3)
Quote from: pendles93 on March 22, 2016, 05:39:16 PM
Quote from: _wato on March 22, 2016, 05:36:59 PM
Jelwood + Menadue (Oliver at M9) or Dusty + Oliver (Menadue at M9)
Do you have Danger? I reckon option 2, Oliver too much for m9.
Laird and Lonergan (d4) or Wines and Lonergan (d3)
He's not too much for M9 if we don't have enough rookies to fill a midfield bench. Pending round 1 team announcements, option 1 could be the way to go.
Also, Laird and Lonergan.
Gibson vs. Yeo +50k??
Quote from: Sicko on March 22, 2016, 06:04:48 PM
Gibson vs. Yeo +50k??
Yeo plus the fiddy for me! Gibbo could be forced back into the lockdown role if there are injuries at some point.
Lonergan + B. Crouch + Oliver + Dusty
vs
Howe + Jelwood + Macaffer + Buddy
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 22, 2016, 08:10:54 PM
Lonergan + B. Crouch + Oliver + Dusty
vs
Howe + Jelwood + Macaffer + Buddy
First option looks safer so I'll go with that. Not a fan of Howe's JS.
Quote from: TomK on March 22, 2016, 11:58:09 AM
Pendles & NN & 10k vs Danger & Gawn & No cash left
Good luck with these ones - reasons if ya got time lads ;D
Hannez vs Priddis :o
Have Hannez at the moment as no has him for some reason, will finish in the top8 POD
Libba vs B.Crouch
Have b.crouch for a number of reasons (don't want both) and will need to restructure to change him to libba.
Cheers
Quote from: petefisker on March 22, 2016, 08:36:27 PM
Good luck with these ones - reasons if ya got time lads ;D
Hannez vs Priddis :o
Have Hannez at the moment as no has him for some reason, will be in the top8 POD
Libba vs B.Crouch
Have b.crouch for a number of reasons (don't want both) and will need to restructure to change him to libba.
Cheers
Priddis and Libba for me.
Priddis has been consistent and durable for a number of seasons. He started slow last year, and if he comes out firing round 1 could easily average 115.
Crouch and Libba are tough to split, but personal preference is Libba
Quote from: jfitty on March 22, 2016, 08:40:37 PM
Quote from: petefisker on March 22, 2016, 08:36:27 PM
Good luck with these ones - reasons if ya got time lads ;D
Hannez vs Priddis :o
Have Hannez at the moment as no has him for some reason, will be in the top8 POD
Libba vs B.Crouch
Have b.crouch for a number of reasons (don't want both) and will need to restructure to change him to libba.
Cheers
Priddis and Libba for me.
Priddis has been consistent and durable for a number of seasons. He started slow last year, and if he comes out firing round 1 could easily average 115.
Crouch and Libba are tough to split, but personal preference is Libba
Agree Priddis is crazy consistent. But he does generally starts slow and WC have freo + Hawks R2 and R3 vs Swans piss easy opening 4 rounds is why I went Hannez. He will do well vs 'IF' priddis comes out firing. No doubt you'd prob want them both end of the road, but working out who to start.
Westoff vs S. Gray for F2?? Barlow my F1, DeGoey F3, Wells F4.
Rich (D3), Pendles (M3) and Hall (F2)
v
Rich (D3), Cripps (M5) and Dahl (F1)
v
Seedsman (D3), Pendles (M3) and Dusty/Dahl (F1)
Libba and Lonergan vs Mills and Simmo/Rance/Houli
:)
Easy one for Brisbane fans. Tom Cutler v Ryan Harwood :-\
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:42:59 PM
:)
Easy one for Brisbane fans. Tom Cutler v Ryan Harwood :-\
Not easy at all haha. Pre-nab, definitely Harwood. Now...not so sure. Very tempted to go with Cutler, but less cash to be made there. I dunno :-X
Quote from: GoLions on March 22, 2016, 10:44:51 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:42:59 PM
:)
Easy one for Brisbane fans. Tom Cutler v Ryan Harwood :-\
Not easy at all haha. Pre-nab, definitely Harwood. Now...not so sure. Very tempted to go with Cutler, but less cash to be made there. I dunno :-X
In that case GL would you take either, both or zero ?? ??
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:47:39 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 22, 2016, 10:44:51 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:42:59 PM
:)
Easy one for Brisbane fans. Tom Cutler v Ryan Harwood :-\
Not easy at all haha. Pre-nab, definitely Harwood. Now...not so sure. Very tempted to go with Cutler, but less cash to be made there. I dunno :-X
In that case GL would you take either, both or zero ?? ??
Only 1. If both named round 1, probably Harwood.
Quote from: GoLions on March 22, 2016, 10:48:40 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:47:39 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 22, 2016, 10:44:51 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:42:59 PM
:)
Easy one for Brisbane fans. Tom Cutler v Ryan Harwood :-\
Not easy at all haha. Pre-nab, definitely Harwood. Now...not so sure. Very tempted to go with Cutler, but less cash to be made there. I dunno :-X
In that case GL would you take either, both or zero ?? ??
Only 1. If both named round 1, probably Harwood.
Thanks mate :)
Shiel + Crouch vs. Wines + Libba?
shiel vs ward vs robbie gray
Goldy/Milera vs. Nicnat/B Crouch.
gaz v pendles v danger v selwood. need to pick 2 of them
Quote from: crowls on March 23, 2016, 02:03:00 AM
gaz v pendles v danger v selwood. need to pick 2 of them
Gaz and Danger IMO will score the most points of the 2.
Selwood also is in my side.
Am concerned about Pendles changing role and the depth of the Collingwood mids. I can see him dropping in average. I would prefer to wait and see on Pendles.
Quote from: AaronKirk on March 23, 2016, 02:33:22 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 23, 2016, 02:03:00 AM
gaz v pendles v danger v selwood. need to pick 2 of them
Gaz and Danger IMO will score the most points of the 2.
Selwood also is in my side.
Am concerned about Pendles changing role and the depth of the Collingwood mids. I can see him dropping in average. I would prefer to wait and see on Pendles.
Did Pendles go bald and announce the plans for his 32nd b'day in 6 weeks?
The only reason not to pick Pendles is because you believe the other Super Premos are in for a 130+ season with Rocky Selwood et al being able to match Pendles at a significant discount.
He's in his prime and every Collingwood supporter I know have entered into rediculous bets that they'll be top8 this year. If Pendles isn't leading all over the ground Bucks will be torn to shreds.
Harwood or Weitering?
T superboot Mckenzie vs J longergan?
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 04:33:28 AM
Harwood or Weitering?
both will have a similar output 70-75, weits is cheaper.
Quote from: smashbox on March 23, 2016, 09:15:55 AM
T superboot Mckenzie vs J longergan?
Had McKenzie and Lonergan in at some stage this preseason but have chosen Seedsman instead.
Lonergan if forced to choose
Quote from: HotTiges on March 23, 2016, 12:47:52 AM
shiel vs ward vs robbie gray
shiel has the most upside, but i like gray.
Quote from: BomberSam on March 23, 2016, 12:03:14 AM
Shiel + Crouch vs. Wines + Libba?
shiel & crouch, slightly more upside. dont think Wines will go over 105
Quote from: almonds on March 22, 2016, 10:25:45 PM
Libba and Lonergan vs Mills and Simmo/Rance/Houli
option 2 w/ Houli. big year for him.
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:56:07 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 22, 2016, 10:48:40 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:47:39 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 22, 2016, 10:44:51 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 22, 2016, 10:42:59 PM
:)
Easy one for Brisbane fans. Tom Cutler v Ryan Harwood :-\
Not easy at all haha. Pre-nab, definitely Harwood. Now...not so sure. Very tempted to go with Cutler, but less cash to be made there. I dunno :-X
In that case GL would you take either, both or zero ?? ??
Only 1. If both named round 1, probably Harwood.
Thanks mate :)
Just to confuse I have taken Cutler - Predicting him to be my Brisbane break out player this year. Not a lot of price difference between Harwood and Cutler.
Quote from: steven3 on March 22, 2016, 04:16:15 PM
Quote from: vtaced on March 22, 2016, 03:49:05 PM
Priddis vs Pendels?
Pendles easily
Don't know about easily - Priddis has to be the most under rated premium out there.
Quote from: Thewizz71 on March 23, 2016, 10:29:32 AM
Quote from: steven3 on March 22, 2016, 04:16:15 PM
Quote from: vtaced on March 22, 2016, 03:49:05 PM
Priddis vs Pendels?
Pendles easily
Don't know about easily - Priddis has to be the most under rated premium out there.
Which makes Pendles the only underrated
super-premium.
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 23, 2016, 10:36:03 AM
Quote from: MC on March 23, 2016, 10:31:25 AM
Quote from: Thewizz71 on March 23, 2016, 10:29:32 AM
Quote from: steven3 on March 22, 2016, 04:16:15 PM
Quote from: vtaced on March 22, 2016, 03:49:05 PM
Priddis vs Pendels?
Pendles easily
Don't know about easily - Priddis has to be the most under rated premium out there.
Fair call - I'm happy to start Priddis and bring Pendles in later, think they will be very similar in scores.
Which makes Pendles the only underrated super-premium.
Harwood + De Goey vs Lonergan + Lyons
Quote from: Gambino on March 23, 2016, 11:13:19 AM
Harwood + De Goey vs Lonergan + Lyons
I like L.L that if Lyons can maintain his spot in the best 22.
Priddis, Lonergan, Nic Nat, Rance/Houli
Vs
Clayton Oliver, Shaw, Goldy, Bartel
Anyone?
Quote from: madskill55 on March 23, 2016, 12:01:51 PM
Quote from: Gambino on March 23, 2016, 11:13:19 AM
Harwood + De Goey vs Lonergan + Lyons
I like L.L that if Lyons can maintain his spot in the best 22.
Priddis, Lonergan, Nic Nat, Rance/Houli
Vs
Clayton Oliver, Shaw, Goldy, Bartel
Anyone?
Option 2 there mate
Ablett vs Shiel
Danger & Lonergan/Sheridan
VS
Ward & Rich
Quote from: essendon33 on March 23, 2016, 12:49:55 PM
Danger & Lonergan/Sheridan
VS
Ward & Rich
Danger and Lonergan
Shiel vs Sidebottom vs R Gray?
Quote from: TexR74 on March 23, 2016, 01:19:32 PM
Shiel vs Sidebottom vs R Gray?
Gray , Shiel then Sidebottom . Shiel and gray close. Go shiel if the extra 40k helps elsewhere
Kommer - Milera - McCarthy... Which 2
Quote from: mzunguman on March 23, 2016, 01:38:40 PM
Kommer - Milera - McCarthy... Which 2
Milera & McCarthy
fyfe & Liba vs Shiel & Gray
Libba vs Oliver + $160,000 ( is Libba well and truly a keeper with the emergence of Bont/Wallis/Dahl??? )
Which then translate to keeping Lonergan as D3 or upgrading to anyone from Simpson down having already Shaw & Laird
Sheridan v Lonergan v Seedsman
Dusty & Hurn
vs.
Shaw & Hall
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 23, 2016, 02:39:39 PM
Libba vs Oliver + $160,000 ( is Libba well and truly a keeper with the emergence of Bont/Wallis/Dahl??? )
Which then translate to keeping Lonergan as D3 or upgrading to anyone from Simpson down having already Shaw & Laird
Libba way more upside than Oliver I reckon and I'm not super enthused by any defenders that price bracket opens
Quote from: dmac07 on March 23, 2016, 02:49:47 PM
Sheridan v Lonergan v Seedsman
Seeeeeeds I reckon... Can't decide out of him and Rich for my own team!
Quote from: Vulpes on March 23, 2016, 03:17:38 PM
Dusty & Hurn
vs.
Shaw & Hall
Shaw & Hall
Lonergan
Seedsman vs Lonergan vs Sheridan
Quote from: dmac07 on March 23, 2016, 02:49:47 PM
Sheridan v Lonergan v Seedsman
Quote from: mattttwillll on March 23, 2016, 04:57:45 PM
Seedsman vs Lonergan vs Sheridan
Lonergan-Sheridan-Seeedsman
Wouldn't touch Seedsman, but Lonergan and Sheridan are both solid picks. Lonergan, just
Gawn vs Naitanui
Sheradin, Cutler, Leuenberger vs Cutler, Broad and Mumford +65k vs Sheradin, Broad, Mumford?
Gray vs jpk vs Selwood
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 23, 2016, 06:08:52 PM
Goldy/Milera vs. NicNat/B Crouch
I'd go Nic Nat/Crouch. No ruck in the last few years has been top scoring ruck back to back, and nic nat is only going to get better
Leuenberger, Cutler vs Mumford, Broad
QuoteMumford + Broad
Lonergan + Milera
vs
Hall + McCarthy
Quote from: dmac07 on March 23, 2016, 02:49:47 PM
Sheridan v Lonergan v Seedsman
Lonergan due to playing in the midfield.
Quote from: Huttabito on March 23, 2016, 06:47:53 PM
QuoteMumford + Broad
Hall + McCarthy
Boyd v T.McDonald v Houli v Rance.
Shaw, Laird, Boyd, Wietering, Dea, Brown
vs
Shaw, Laird, Bartel, Lonergan, Dea, Brown
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 07:16:58 PM
Shaw, Laird, Boyd, Wietering, Dea, Brown
vs
Shaw, Laird, Bartel, Lonergan, Dea, Brown
Bartel and Lonergan over Boyd and Weitering essentially...
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 23, 2016, 07:27:24 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 07:16:58 PM
Shaw, Laird, Boyd, Wietering, Dea, Brown
vs
Shaw, Laird, Bartel, Lonergan, Dea, Brown
Bartel and Lonergan over Boyd and Weitering essentially...
Hah!
Yeah that's what I was trying to say mate. LOL!
Cheers. :)
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 07:30:13 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 23, 2016, 07:27:24 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 07:16:58 PM
Shaw, Laird, Boyd, Wietering, Dea, Brown
vs
Shaw, Laird, Bartel, Lonergan, Dea, Brown
Bartel and Lonergan over Boyd and Weitering essentially...
Hah!
Yeah that's what I was trying to say mate. LOL!
Cheers. :)
Bartel & Lonergan, you have potentially 2 keepers there.
Take Supercoach seriously and pull my hair out over the next 48 hours vs rolling with what I've got
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 07:30:13 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 23, 2016, 07:27:24 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 07:16:58 PM
Shaw, Laird, Boyd, Wietering, Dea, Brown
vs
Shaw, Laird, Bartel, Lonergan, Dea, Brown
Bartel and Lonergan over Boyd and Weitering essentially...
Hah!
Yeah that's what I was trying to say mate. LOL!
Cheers. :)
No worries, I knew what you were getting at. ;)
Quote from: Bully on March 23, 2016, 08:09:42 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 07:30:13 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 23, 2016, 07:27:24 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on March 23, 2016, 07:16:58 PM
Shaw, Laird, Boyd, Wietering, Dea, Brown
vs
Shaw, Laird, Bartel, Lonergan, Dea, Brown
Bartel and Lonergan over Boyd and Weitering essentially...
Hah!
Yeah that's what I was trying to say mate. LOL!
Cheers. :)
Bartel & Lonergan, you have potentially 2 keepers there.
True mate.
Lonergan looks better at D4 than Wietering.
Sacrifice I had to make though was downgrade Adams from D8 to Ruggles so I could afford Lonergan.
Need Ruggles to play.
Have Davis at M11 and McDonald-Alphabet at F8 so need these $102k guys to be elevated by tomorrow and playing round 1 or otherwise I will need to make some last minute changes.
Quote from: My Chumps on March 23, 2016, 08:10:55 PM
Take Supercoach seriously and pull my hair out over the next 48 hours vs rolling with what I've got
Enjoy the anguish!
kk vs gibbo vs macmillian vs roberton vs anyone else sub 492k
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 23, 2016, 08:29:53 PM
kk vs gibbo vs macmillian vs roberton vs anyone else sub 492k
I like Roberton out of that lot as a POD.
laird vs simpson
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 23, 2016, 08:36:06 PM
laird vs simpson
Laird for me.
Both good picks though.
Ablett SMartin v Sheil/Goldy
Seedsman vs Dea
Similar outputs in nab but very different prices
Ablett Martin probably a safer bet but I'd go sheil goldy. I reckon Shiel will finish as a 600k plus midfielder as long as he stays on the field.
Libba vs Matt Crouch
Im totally stuck on:
Pendles & Mackenzie
Vs
Shaw & Crouch
Shaw and Crouch
Quote from: Slightly01 on March 23, 2016, 10:12:24 PM
Im totally stuck on:
Pendles & Mackenzie
Vs
Shaw & Crouch
Quote from: Slightly01 on March 23, 2016, 10:12:24 PM
Im totally stuck on:
Pendles & Mackenzie
Vs
Shaw & Crouch
Shaw and Crouch IMO.
crouch rance mid rook
vs
pendles oliver def rook
Quote from: Slightly01 on March 23, 2016, 10:12:24 PM
Im totally stuck on:
Pendles & Mackenzie
Vs
Shaw & Crouch
Shaw & Crouch
Harwood Weitering Hall
Vs
Hurn Lonergan Milera
Quote from: Odds On on March 23, 2016, 11:03:42 PM
Quote from: Slightly01 on March 23, 2016, 10:12:24 PM
Im totally stuck on:
Pendles & Mackenzie
Vs
Shaw & Crouch
Shaw & Crouch
Harwood Weitering Hall
Vs
Hurn Lonergan Milera
1 i think
Shaw and Hall Vs Dusty and Simpson
Selwood and Martin or Priddis and Gawn?
Houli & Crouch vs M Brown and Fyfe
1st option has Dea as D6 and tossing up between MBrown and McCarthy for F7. 4 premo mids plus Libba and Crouch.
2nd option gives me 5 premo mids plus Libba, but Dea and Brown are D5 & D6 respectively. Thoughts?
Milera v Sicily v Duggan vs De Goey
Currently gone with De Goey, the most expensive option, because I had the cash.
Quote from: Nige on March 24, 2016, 12:16:22 AM
Milera v Sicily v Duggan vs De Goey
Currently gone with De Goey, the most expensive option, because I had the cash.
If money not an issue then I agree, De Goey
If you need the cash I would pick Duggan good JS now Sheed is injured along with Masten
Quote from: Gigantor on March 24, 2016, 12:22:57 AM
Quote from: Nige on March 24, 2016, 12:16:22 AM
Milera v Sicily v Duggan vs De Goey
Currently gone with De Goey, the most expensive option, because I had the cash.
If money not an issue then I agree, De Goey
If you need the cash I would pick Duggan good JS now Sheed is injured along with Masten
There's about 90k difference between De Goey and Duggan, if I went Duggan (who is the other one I'm considering more so than the others out of the 4) then I'd have like $130k just sitting around which I can't find a use for anywhere else.
Is it too much to have both houli and rance in your backline?
If it is then pick one
Houli vs Rance
Weitering vs. E.Mackenzie
Quote from: steven3 on March 24, 2016, 12:37:25 AM
Is it too much to have both houli and rance in your backline?
If it is then pick one
Houli vs Rance
Both should be fine, otherwise Houli
Weitering vs. E.Mackenzie (quote wouldn't work)
-Emac
If Caff and McCarthy are both named:
Macaffer vs McCarthy (Menadue fwd/mid)
Dea, Pendles
v
Cutler, Cripps
Quote from: eg6914 on March 24, 2016, 03:14:17 AM
If Caff and McCarthy are both named:
Macaffer vs McCarthy (Menadue fwd/mid)
Probably Caff because there's not much price difference and Caff is a known quantity, probs only good for 50-60 at best though
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 24, 2016, 07:49:56 AM
Dea, Pendles
v
Cutler, Cripps
Dea + Pendles no question.
Rance and Priddis
v
Houli and Pendles
Oliver + $99K vs. B Crouch??
realistically i reckon Oliver can avg 80 in the 1st 7 rounds, and Crouch to avg 90.
at their prices Oliver would make a tad under $150K, while Crouch would make $100k
is a $150k difference worth 70 point defecate??
Danger & Bartel v Houli & R Gray?
Ben Kennedy v Connor Menadue?
McCarthy vs. Milera ??
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 24, 2016, 10:49:33 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on March 24, 2016, 10:46:30 AM
Ben Kennedy v Connor Menadue?
ben but get both
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 24, 2016, 10:42:52 AM
Quote from: reenergised on March 24, 2016, 10:40:32 AM
Danger & Bartel v Houli & R Gray?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 24, 2016, 08:51:14 AM
Rance and Priddis
v
Houli and Pendles
Houli Pendles
Kade Simpson / Wines or Bartel/ Jelwood?
Hannebery, Milera, 102k ruck - (Wells at F3, has a loophole option but no ruck cover, $4.6k Remaining)
vs
Dusty, Oliver, Grimley - (More balanced, no loophole option but have ruck cover, only 4 premo mids, $200 Remaining)
Pendles + Kommer + Hartley
v
Oliver + Lonergan + Seedsman
basically on field its
Pendles Brown Tippa
v
Mills Lonergan Seedsman
Dahlhaus + Lonergan or Greene/Hall + Bartel
Quote from: colmullet on March 24, 2016, 11:39:17 AM
Dahlhaus + Lonergan or Greene/Hall + Bartel
Hall + Bartel
Sidebottom +$100k vs Pendles
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2016, 11:35:52 AM
Hannebery, Milera, 102k ruck - (Wells at F3, has a loophole option but no ruck cover, $4.6k Remaining)
vs
Dusty, Oliver, Grimley - (More balanced, no loophole option but have ruck cover, only 4 premo mids, $200 Remaining)
I lean towards the first, everyone will have a floating donut somewhere.
Quote from: Holz on March 24, 2016, 11:38:17 AM
Pendles + Kommer + Hartley
v
Oliver + Lonergan + Seedsman
basically on field its
Pendles Brown Tippa
v
Mills Lonergan Seedsman
At this stage I dunno about Tippa lining up so number 2, but if they're all in, no.1.
Quote from: colmullet on March 24, 2016, 11:39:17 AM
Dahlhaus + Lonergan or Greene/Hall + Bartel
flip a coin. But I lean towards the second
Quote from: blackrose on March 24, 2016, 11:41:10 AM
Sidebottom +$100k vs Pendles
You jest. Pendles.
NOW, Seedsman + DeGoey vs anyone except Shaw + Milera
I like Seeds + De Goey but both are risks, am I better off locking in a prem defender and a rook that I know I'll have to trade?
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 24, 2016, 11:42:46 AM
Quote from: TomK on March 24, 2016, 11:35:52 AM
Hannebery, Milera, 102k ruck - (Wells at F3, has a loophole option but no ruck cover, $4.6k Remaining)
vs
Dusty, Oliver, Grimley - (More balanced, no loophole option but have ruck cover, only 4 premo mids, $200 Remaining)
I lean towards the first, everyone will have a floating donut somewhere.
It's what I've currently got, just a bit nervous about only having Barlow, Hall and Wells with the rest rookies.
Quote from: GCSkiwi on March 24, 2016, 11:42:46 AM
NOW, Seedsman + DeGoey vs anyone except Shaw + Milera
I like Seeds + De Goey but both are risks, am I better off locking in a prem defender and a rook that I know I'll have to trade?
I prefer the prem defender + Milera, better to save trades anyway you can
Quote from: colmullet on March 24, 2016, 11:39:17 AM
Dahlhaus + Lonergan or Greene/Hall + Bartel
Hall and Bartel.
Goldstein, Hall, Menadue, B.Kennedy, Seedsman
vs
Z.Smith, Wingard, B.Crouch, McCarthy, J.Lonergan
I'm stuck :-X
Quote from: Maca24 on March 24, 2016, 11:55:12 AM
Hall and Bartel.
Goldstein, Hall, Menadue, B.Kennedy, Seedsman
vs
Z.Smith, Wingard, B.Crouch, McCarthy, J.Lonergan
I'm stuck :-X
Top option, need Goldy
Josh Gibson vs Houli vs Rance
for D2??
Quote from: freddo81 on March 24, 2016, 12:50:43 PM
Josh Gibson vs Houli vs Rance
for D2??
Houli
Quote from: Maca24 on March 24, 2016, 11:55:12 AM
Quote from: colmullet on March 24, 2016, 11:39:17 AM
Dahlhaus + Lonergan or Greene/Hall + Bartel
Hall and Bartel.
Goldstein, Hall, Menadue, B.Kennedy, Seedsman
vs
Z.Smith, Wingard, B.Crouch, McCarthy, J.Lonergan
I'm stuck :-X
top 1
GCSkiwi - prem and Milera
Now mine - Wingard and B.Smith vs Laird and Hall
Quote from: Gandalf123 on March 24, 2016, 01:02:01 PM
Quote from: freddo81 on March 24, 2016, 12:50:43 PM
Josh Gibson vs Houli vs Rance
for D2??
Houli
Quote from: Maca24 on March 24, 2016, 11:55:12 AM
Quote from: colmullet on March 24, 2016, 11:39:17 AM
Dahlhaus + Lonergan or Greene/Hall + Bartel
Hall and Bartel.
Goldstein, Hall, Menadue, B.Kennedy, Seedsman
vs
Z.Smith, Wingard, B.Crouch, McCarthy, J.Lonergan
I'm stuck :-X
top 1
GCSkiwi - prem and Milera
Now mine - Wingard and B.Smith vs Laird and Hall
Shaw - Oliver - Milera
vs
Brown Selwood DeGoey/Steele
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 24, 2016, 01:03:56 PM
Shaw - Oliver - Milera
vs
Brown Selwood DeGoey/Steele
Shaw - Oliver - Milera
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 24, 2016, 01:03:56 PM
Shaw - Oliver - Milera
vs
Brown Selwood DeGoey/Steele
Brown Selwood J Steele
C Wingard v S Gray T McDonald v D Rich J Johannisen v J Lonergan
Then forgetting the v and structure how about just the best 3 out of the 6 please ?? ?? ;)
Wingard Rich Johannisen for mine mate.
Pendles Gawn Buddy VS Libba Goldy Dahlhaus
Quote from: Slightly01 on March 24, 2016, 02:16:04 PM
Wingard Rich Johannisen for mine mate.
Pendles Gawn Buddy VS Libba Goldy Dahlhaus
Maybe second option
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on March 24, 2016, 02:07:15 PM
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 24, 2016, 01:03:56 PM
Shaw - Oliver - Milera
vs
Brown Selwood DeGoey/Steele
Brown Selwood J Steele
C Wingard v S Gray T McDonald v D Rich J Johannisen v J Lonergan
Then forgetting the v and structure how about just the best 3 out of the 6 please ?? ?? ;)
60:40 in Gray's favour, Rich, Lonergan.
Quote from: Slightly01 on March 24, 2016, 02:16:04 PM
Wingard Rich Johannisen for mine mate.
Pendles Gawn Buddy VS Libba Goldy Dahlhaus
Get in your Golden Libhaus.
De goey + Libba + 76k vs Dangerfield + Tippa + 2k
Goldy, Shiel, Wingard
VS
S,Martin, Ablett, Wingard
VS
Nic Nat, Ablett, Montagna
Quote from: rocky38 on March 24, 2016, 03:47:35 PM
Goldy, Shiel, Wingard
VS
S,Martin, Ablett, Wingard
VS
Nic Nat, Ablett, Montagna
Goldy, Ablett, and someone else
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 24, 2016, 03:58:12 PM
Quote from: rocky38 on March 24, 2016, 03:47:35 PM
Goldy, Shiel, Wingard
VS
S,Martin, Ablett, Wingard
VS
Nic Nat, Ablett, Montagna
Goldy, Ablett, and someone else
$472,000 to spend if so
Quote from: rocky38 on March 24, 2016, 04:08:08 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 24, 2016, 03:58:12 PM
Quote from: rocky38 on March 24, 2016, 03:47:35 PM
Goldy, Shiel, Wingard
VS
S,Martin, Ablett, Wingard
VS
Nic Nat, Ablett, Montagna
Goldy, Ablett, and someone else
$472,000 to spend if so
do u have hall?
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 24, 2016, 04:10:12 PM
Quote from: rocky38 on March 24, 2016, 04:08:08 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 24, 2016, 03:58:12 PM
Quote from: rocky38 on March 24, 2016, 03:47:35 PM
Goldy, Shiel, Wingard
VS
S,Martin, Ablett, Wingard
VS
Nic Nat, Ablett, Montagna
Goldy, Ablett, and someone else
$472,000 to spend if so
do u have hall?
Goldy, Ablett, Buddy
Quote from: tommy10 on March 23, 2016, 11:58:15 PM
Houli & Crouch vs M Brown and Fyfe
1st option has Dea as D6 and tossing up between MBrown and McCarthy for F7. 4 premo mids plus Libba and Crouch.
2nd option gives me 5 premo mids plus Libba, but Dea and Brown are D5 & D6 respectively. Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Quote from: tommy10 on March 24, 2016, 04:38:18 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 23, 2016, 11:58:15 PM
Houli & Crouch vs M Brown and Fyfe
1st option has Dea as D6 and tossing up between MBrown and McCarthy for F7. 4 premo mids plus Libba and Crouch.
2nd option gives me 5 premo mids plus Libba, but Dea and Brown are D5 & D6 respectively. Thoughts?
Thoughts?
I'm going #2
OPTION A
BOYD & Weitering
OPTION B
Simpson & Harwood
Leaning towards Option B. Thoughts?
Quote from: Marstar on March 24, 2016, 04:47:08 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 24, 2016, 04:38:18 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 23, 2016, 11:58:15 PM
Houli & Crouch vs M Brown and Fyfe
1st option has Dea as D6 and tossing up between MBrown and McCarthy for F7. 4 premo mids plus Libba and Crouch.
2nd option gives me 5 premo mids plus Libba, but Dea and Brown are D5 & D6 respectively. Thoughts?
Thoughts?
I'm going #2
Thanks Marstar :)
Quote from: Marcos83 on March 24, 2016, 04:49:38 PM
OPTION A
BOYD & Weitering
OPTION B
Simpson & Harwood
Leaning towards Option B. Thoughts?
Simpson and Weitering
Quote from: Marcos83 on March 24, 2016, 04:49:38 PM
OPTION A
BOYD & Weitering
OPTION B
Simpson & Harwood
Leaning towards Option B. Thoughts?
A for me
Rance vs houli vs roberton vs laird
Pick 2 of the 4
Feel like having both tigers is too much?
Yes too much, hence above I will not pick simmo and weitering.
For you I would pick Houli and Laird
Pendles + Milera v Jelwood + BenKen
(All on field)
Quote from: _wato on March 24, 2016, 05:24:10 PM
Pendles + Milera v Jelwood + BenKen
(All on field)
Bennedy better than Milera on this one but I'm not sold on Jelwood, does you budget fit DanHan and Bennedy? must be close?
1) Seedsman & Fyfe vs Lonergan & Pendles
Quote from: billnats on March 24, 2016, 05:41:46 PM
1) Seedsman & Fyfe vs Lonergan & Pendles
Idk but i prefer fyfe
Im consider trading weitering (d4) to tippa
Then a midpricer to J.Selwood
De goey (f4) v Crouch (m6)
What do u guys think?
Graham Vs Libba? I'm probably going to need some extra cash to get playing rookies in. I really want Dea but can't afford at the moment unless I switch to Libba.
Gawn or Jacobs
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 24, 2016, 05:52:53 PM
De goey (f4) v Crouch (m6)
Crouch for mine.
Quote from: Ingram on March 24, 2016, 05:59:02 PM
Graham Vs Libba?
I'd take Libba. There's more upsidee and considering almost everyone has Libba, you don't want to be caught without him if he fires.
Quote from: whynot102 on March 24, 2016, 06:23:28 PM
Gawn or Jacobs
Gawn. I think the departure of a certain P.Dangerfield will hurt Jacobs and his hitouts to advantage.
Laird and Milera (Or any other forward rookie not named Kennedy,McCarthy Menadue or Kerridge)
OR
Lonergan and Seedsman.
Also, with the knowledge that Beams is out for half the season;
Sam Gray or Zorko.
Quote from: Swoozie on March 24, 2016, 06:40:37 PM
Also, with the knowledge that Beams is out for half the season;
Sam Gray or Zorko.
Sam Gray, Zorko is out r1
Pendlebury (any big premo) + Degoey VS Dusty (any big premo fwd) and Brouch
I know this has prob been talked about a lot, but if cash is not an option for F1, who out of Joey v Dusty v Dahl
S.Gray vs A.Hall vs J.Westhoff?
grimley vs michael
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:00:09 PM
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
put the E on Menadue, if he tons up then bring in Cocky to grab his score.
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:02:18 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:00:09 PM
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
put the E on Menadue, if he tons up then bring in Cocky to grab his score.
is that worth it??
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:02:18 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:00:09 PM
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
put the E on Menadue, if he tons up then bring in Cocky to grab his score.
or Petracca
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:10:26 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:02:18 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:00:09 PM
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
put the E on Menadue, if he tons up then bring in Cocky to grab his score.
is that worth it??
Very hard to split Milera & Cocky at this stage, the two week suspension actually means he'll be a nice POD. All things considered, I rate Cocky's JS much higher than Milera who has Menzel, Cameron & Knight breathing down his neck. The two weeks of lost income isn't such a big deal either given you can't cull all your rookies in one hit.
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:16:21 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:10:26 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:02:18 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:00:09 PM
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
put the E on Menadue, if he tons up then bring in Cocky to grab his score.
is that worth it??
Very hard to split Milera & Cocky at this stage, the two week suspension actually means he'll be a nice POD. All things considered, I rate Cocky's JS much higher than Milera who has Menzel, Cameron & Knight breathing down his neck. The two weeks of lost income isn't such a big deal either given you can't cull all your rookies in one hit.
yes but is it worth dropping ben kennedy??
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:19:35 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:16:21 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:10:26 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:02:18 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:00:09 PM
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
put the E on Menadue, if he tons up then bring in Cocky to grab his score.
is that worth it??
Very hard to split Milera & Cocky at this stage, the two week suspension actually means he'll be a nice POD. All things considered, I rate Cocky's JS much higher than Milera who has Menzel, Cameron & Knight breathing down his neck. The two weeks of lost income isn't such a big deal either given you can't cull all your rookies in one hit.
yes but is it worth dropping ben kennedy??
No
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:21:00 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:19:35 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:16:21 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:10:26 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:02:18 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:00:09 PM
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
put the E on Menadue, if he tons up then bring in Cocky to grab his score.
is that worth it??
Very hard to split Milera & Cocky at this stage, the two week suspension actually means he'll be a nice POD. All things considered, I rate Cocky's JS much higher than Milera who has Menzel, Cameron & Knight breathing down his neck. The two weeks of lost income isn't such a big deal either given you can't cull all your rookies in one hit.
yes but is it worth dropping ben kennedy??
No
i dont understand
do you mean if menadue gets 100 i trade kennedy to cockatoo?
McCarthy or McGovern?
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:23:58 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:21:00 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:19:35 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:16:21 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:10:26 PM
Quote from: Bully on March 24, 2016, 08:02:18 PM
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 24, 2016, 08:00:09 PM
who to start
menadue vs bkennedy
brown vs tippa vs adams
put the E on Menadue, if he tons up then bring in Cocky to grab his score.
is that worth it??
Very hard to split Milera & Cocky at this stage, the two week suspension actually means he'll be a nice POD. All things considered, I rate Cocky's JS much higher than Milera who has Menzel, Cameron & Knight breathing down his neck. The two weeks of lost income isn't such a big deal either given you can't cull all your rookies in one hit.
yes but is it worth dropping ben kennedy??
No
i dont understand
do you mean if menadue gets 100 i trade kennedy to cockatoo?
Personally think that Kennedy has greater upside so I wouldn't make that move.
Gibson vs R Murphy vs Roberton vs Birchall
Now that hewett etc were named what do u think about this proposal
Crouch (m6) + degoey (f4) to a mid premo e.g Gray + hewett (and moving kennedy onto field)
Menadue's 80pts v BKennedy or McCarthy... Have to take Menadue's 80 rookie score I think.
Hello Petracca... Might be a nice loophole to have fwd/mid knowing he'll play soon enough and other rookie options look a tad thin.
Total reshuffle of the rookies after the team announcements.. Have it down to:
Clayton Oliver vs Wayne Milera
Leaning towards Oliver, then throw Bennedy in the forward line..
a few final options for me...
1 - (currently) JJ + Robbo + Shiel
2 - JJ + SGray + Shiel
3 - Rich + Robbo or SGray + Parker
4 - JJ + SGray + Ward
Quote from: jfitty on March 24, 2016, 11:49:10 PM
Total reshuffle of the rookies after the team announcements.. Have it down to:
Clayton Oliver vs Wayne Milera
Leaning towards Oliver, then throw Bennedy in the forward line..
Oliver and bennedy to forward line sounds better to me
Quote from: HotTiges on March 25, 2016, 12:32:20 AM
a few final options for me...
1 - (currently) JJ + Robbo + Shiel
2 - JJ + SGray + Shiel
3 - Rich + Robbo or SGray + Parker
4 - JJ + SGray + Ward
4
Oliver vs parish ?
Quote from: steven3 on March 25, 2016, 01:41:21 AM
Oliver vs parish ?
Tough, I feel Parish has more potential but Oliver has shown more in preseason.
Really it is a same same pick as both, either or none could go gangbusters
McCarthy v Milera?
Quote from: LordSneeze on March 25, 2016, 01:45:58 AM
Quote from: steven3 on March 25, 2016, 01:41:21 AM
Oliver vs parish ?
Tough, I feel Parish has more potential but Oliver has shown more in preseason.
Really it is a same same pick as both, either or none could go gangbusters
I would stick with Oliver as we only saw Parish once in NAB and he's in a team that could get smoked every week, Dees are improving their game so the final points share could be more even to them...
This ^
Heath Shaw and Lonergan v KK and Bartel
And
Oliver v Milera
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 09:12:19 AM
Heath Shaw and Lonergan
v
KK and Bartel
Ha! I was about to ask the same question, except Gibson instead of KK. Got Laird as my other premium. Oliver over Milera for mine.
If Tom Lee is named, Lee v McGovern for that final rookie spot
Quote from: no eye deer on March 25, 2016, 09:52:51 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 09:12:19 AM
Heath Shaw and Lonergan
v
KK and Bartel
Ha! I was about to ask the same question, except Gibson instead of KK. Got Laird as my other premium.
What are u leaning towards mate?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 10:02:07 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on March 25, 2016, 09:52:51 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 09:12:19 AM
Heath Shaw and Lonergan
v
KK and Bartel
Ha! I was about to ask the same question, except Gibson instead of KK. Got Laird as my other premium.
What are u leaning towards mate?
Really don't know. I want both Bartell AND Lonergan, but can't find a way to fit them both in and still be strong enough in defense. Maybe option one, but scared to leave out Jimmy.
Quote from: no eye deer on March 25, 2016, 10:06:49 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 10:02:07 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on March 25, 2016, 09:52:51 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 09:12:19 AM
Heath Shaw and Lonergan
v
KK and Bartel
Ha! I was about to ask the same question, except Gibson instead of KK. Got Laird as my other premium.
What are u leaning towards mate?
Really don't know. I want both Bartell AND Lonergan, but can't find a way to fit them both in and still be strong enough in defense. Maybe option one, but scared to leave out Jimmy.
I've downgraded Cutler and no have Brown at D6, which has allowed me to get Shaw and KK (Houli other premo). I've got my doubts on Jimmy, just feel age catching up. KK I feel is young and ready to burst. Just my opinion of course, I know a lot of others have Jimmy
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 10:11:54 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on March 25, 2016, 10:06:49 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 10:02:07 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on March 25, 2016, 09:52:51 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 25, 2016, 09:12:19 AM
Heath Shaw and Lonergan
v
KK and Bartel
Ha! I was about to ask the same question, except Gibson instead of KK. Got Laird as my other premium.
What are u leaning towards mate?
Really don't know. I want both Bartell AND Lonergan, but can't find a way to fit them both in and still be strong enough in defense. Maybe option one, but scared to leave out Jimmy.
I've downgraded Cutler and no have Brown at D6, which has allowed me to get Shaw and KK (Houli other premo). I've got my doubts on Jimmy, just feel age catching up. KK I feel is young and ready to burst. Just my opinion of course, I know a lot of others have Jimmy
Nice. I can't raise the cash to keep Shaw and have two more premium backs, unless I downgrade Pendles or Gaz. So it comes down to whether I think Lonergan is a good enough D3. He might just have to be for now.
Take 2. Lee v McGovern? (presuming lee is named)
Shaw, B Crouch and Bennedy
v
Lonergan, Oliver and Dahlhaus
Quote from: steven3 on March 25, 2016, 01:41:21 AM
Oliver vs parish ?
This is what I'm deciding at the moment.
Feel Oliver might have slightly higher scoring potential, but barring injury you'd expect Parish to play every week.
Just put Parish in, but would love some other thoughts
Bartel Seedsman Oliver
Papely Wilson Hannebary
on field its
Bartel + Seedsman + Mills
v
Brown/Adams Tippa + Wilson + Hannebary
Lonergan + Shiel v Bartel + Libba
Option one would give me a midfield of Ablett, Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Shiel, Mills, Oliver
J.Lonergan v P.Seedsman
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 11:26:13 AM
J.Lonergan v P.Seedsman
lonergan will probably outscore him in the first 8 weeks so if you want a stepping stone lonergan. if you want a keeper then seedsman i think will beat him over a season.
Quote from: Holz on March 25, 2016, 11:39:43 AM
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 11:26:13 AM
J.Lonergan v P.Seedsman
lonergan will probably outscore him in the first 8 weeks so if you want a stepping stone lonergan. if you want a keeper then seedsman i think will beat him over a season.
ill reword
lonergan v seedsman (average)
Quote from: Wall-E on March 25, 2016, 11:23:37 AM
Lonergan + Shiel v Bartel + Libba
Option one would give me a midfield of Ablett, Fyfe, Danger, Pendles, Rocky, Shiel, Mills, Oliver
I prefer Bartel + Libba
Pendlebury & Oliver vs Joel Selwood & Brad Crouch?
Quote from: MontyJnr on March 25, 2016, 12:10:49 PM
Pendlebury & Oliver vs Joel Selwood & Brad Crouch?
Selwood and Crouch easily to be honest mate.
Dangerfield, Mills, Lobbe
vs
JPK, Hewett, Naitanui
Quote from: Jayman on March 25, 2016, 12:13:22 PM
Dangerfield, Mills, Lobbe
vs
JPK, Hewett, Naitanui
Option 2 - You get two keepers JPK/Nic Nat
Which 2 of.. Papley, L.McCarthy, Milera, M.McGovern, B.Hardwick.
For two bemch spots so not super keen on picking Milera at 170k on the bench.
Rich, De Goey, Hewett M10 v Gibson, Milera, Oliver M9
Lonergan vs Seedsman ( end of season average)
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 12:44:58 PM
Which 2 of.. Papley, L.McCarthy, Milera, M.McGovern, B.Hardwick.
For two bemch spots so not super keen on picking Milera at 170k on the bench.
McCarthy deffs one, and probably Milera for JS mate.
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 12:53:06 PM
Lonergan vs Seedsman ( end of season average)
Seedsman
Quote from: Jayman on March 25, 2016, 12:13:22 PM
Dangerfield, Mills, Lobbe
vs
JPK, Hewett, Naitanui
JPK, Nat, Hewett
K.Langford vs M.Mcgovern
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 12:58:05 PM
K.Langford vs M.Mcgovern
Langford probably a better option if you have the cash, but I'd throw him on the field as that's a lot of cash on the bench.
Libba vs B.Crouch
Parker vs Shiel vs Treloar
Quote from: Maca24 on March 25, 2016, 01:00:29 PM
Libba vs B.Crouch
Parker vs Shiel vs Treloar
Both but probs Libba for safety, Crouch a calculated risk. I like both.
Shiel > Parker > Treloar on prices
Oliver vs Hewett
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 12:53:06 PM
Lonergan vs Seedsman ( end of season average)
I think Lonergan is guaranteed mid time so will end up being the better pick.
Fyfe + Sloane (+2.1k)
Pendles + Priddis (+3.6k)
Hannebery + Priddis (+12.9k)
Quote from: Huttabito on March 25, 2016, 01:39:37 PM
Fyfe + Sloane (+2.1k)
Pendles + Priddis (+3.6k)
Hannebery + Priddis (+12.9k)
I'd go Pendles Priddis mate. Few question marks around Sloane without Danger and Pendles > Hanners.
Quote from: Jayman on March 25, 2016, 12:12:17 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on March 25, 2016, 12:10:49 PM
Pendlebury & Oliver vs Joel Selwood & Brad Crouch?
Selwood and Crouch easily to be honest mate.
What about Fyfe & Oliver vs Joel Selwood & Brad Crouch?
Quote from: MontyJnr on March 25, 2016, 01:46:25 PM
Quote from: Jayman on March 25, 2016, 12:12:17 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on March 25, 2016, 12:10:49 PM
Pendlebury & Oliver vs Joel Selwood & Brad Crouch?
Selwood and Crouch easily to be honest mate.
What about Fyfe & Oliver vs Joel Selwood & Brad Crouch?
Fyfe's a must, Selwood isn't. So I'd take Fyfe and Oliver.
D4/F3
Seedsman and Greene
Vs
Gibson/Bartel and Degoey.
Rest of lines are;
Def - Shaw, Laird, Simpson, ______, Dea, Tippa (Brown, Adams)
Fwd - Barlow, Hall, ______, Wells, B.Kennedy, Menadue (McCarthy, Papley)
Really stuck on this one. Could also do McKenzie Buddy
Danger + S.Martin + Crowly
Vs
Selwood + NNat + Libba
Quote from: Marstar on March 25, 2016, 02:36:50 PM
Danger + S.Martin + Crowly
Vs
Selwood + NNat + Libba
Danger, Martin and another 200k mid, Gresham/Mills/Oliiver/Kennedy atc.
I need as many opinions as possible... Wines vs. Shiel.
Quote from: BomberSam on March 25, 2016, 02:40:47 PM
I need as many opinions as possible... Wines vs. Shiel.
shiel
Mitch McGovern vs. Tom Papley?
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:50:02 PM
Mitch McGovern vs. Tom Papley?
Tough call, think McGocern is more likely to keep his spot, papley better scoring potential. I think risk it on Papley
Quote from: _wato on March 25, 2016, 12:51:01 PM
Rich, De Goey, Hewett M10 v Gibson, Milera, Oliver M9
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 02:51:43 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:50:02 PM
Mitch McGovern vs. Tom Papley?
Tough call, think McGocern is more likely to keep his spot, papley better scoring potential. I think risk it on Papley
I wish I could afford someone less dodgy... already have McCarthy, Milera, Bennedy, Kerridge so it's just that awful F8 spot.
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 02:42:15 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on March 25, 2016, 02:40:47 PM
I need as many opinions as possible... Wines vs. Shiel.
shiel
Ollie Wines for mine.
Midfield bench : Brant Colledge (WC) v George Hewett (Syd)
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:53:12 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 02:51:43 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:50:02 PM
Mitch McGovern vs. Tom Papley?
Tough call, think McGocern is more likely to keep his spot, papley better scoring potential. I think risk it on Papley
I wish I could afford someone less dodgy... already have McCarthy, Milera, Bennedy, Kerridge so it's just that awful F8 spot.
Same, but it also seems a waste to have Milera and McCarthy both on my bemch. I also went Papley so I could Petracca to Gresham
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 02:58:46 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:53:12 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 02:51:43 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:50:02 PM
Mitch McGovern vs. Tom Papley?
Tough call, think McGocern is more likely to keep his spot, papley better scoring potential. I think risk it on Papley
I wish I could afford someone less dodgy... already have McCarthy, Milera, Bennedy, Kerridge so it's just that awful F8 spot.
Same, but it also seems a waste to have Milera and McCarthy both on my bemch. I also went Papley so I could Petracca to Gresham
You'd take Gresham over Hewett, yeah?
Lonergan, Shiel, Hewett and DeGoey
v
JJ, Brouch, Oliver and Buddy
v
Gibson, Brouch, Hewett, Hall + 64k
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 03:03:17 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 02:58:46 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:53:12 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 02:51:43 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:50:02 PM
Mitch McGovern vs. Tom Papley?
Tough call, think McGocern is more likely to keep his spot, papley better scoring potential. I think risk it on Papley
I wish I could afford someone less dodgy... already have McCarthy, Milera, Bennedy, Kerridge so it's just that awful F8 spot.
Same, but it also seems a waste to have Milera and McCarthy both on my bemch. I also went Papley so I could Petracca to Gresham
You'd take Gresham over Hewett, yeah?
Yeah mate. That looks a given. Saints have big wraps on him. Hewett's JS looks a lot shakier.
Sidebottom vs Shiel?
Shiel... looks set to become elite!
With Hartley not named I'm now restructuring my D1-3
Boyd, Bartel, Smith
Vs
Laird, Bartel, Rich/Smith??
Quote from: _wato on March 25, 2016, 12:51:01 PM
Rich, De Goey, Hewett M10 v Gibson, Milera, Oliver M9
Option 2, just. Mainly because I don't really rate the Rich pick myself. From a structure POV, Option 1 probably makes more sense than having Oliver on the bench (an issue I'm also dealing with)
Quote from: SC_Dave on March 25, 2016, 02:53:48 PM
Midfield bench : Brant Colledge (WC) v George Hewett (Syd)
Hewett, could be good sneaky cash cow if he holds his place for a few weeks!
Quote from: blackrose on March 25, 2016, 03:08:40 PM
Sidebottom vs Shiel?
Shiel
Quote from: tommy10 on March 25, 2016, 03:06:12 PM
Lonergan, Shiel, Hewett and DeGoey
v
JJ, Brouch, Oliver and Buddy
v
Gibson, Brouch, Hewett, Hall + 64k
Hmm, probably the 1st option!
Last big dilemma for me:
Option 1: Libba, Crouch, Hartley and 87k (possibly for Hewett to Oliver at M10)
Option 2: Oliver, Crouch and Lonergan
Option 3A: Libba, Oliver and Longeran (downgrade Laird to Birchall)
Option 3B: Libba, Oliver and Lonergan (downgrade Danger to Robbie Gray)
Sorry if its confusing and cheers to anyone who responds!
Quote from: enzedder on March 25, 2016, 03:08:13 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 03:03:17 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 02:58:46 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:53:12 PM
Quote from: dmac07 on March 25, 2016, 02:51:43 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 02:50:02 PM
Mitch McGovern vs. Tom Papley?
Tough call, think McGocern is more likely to keep his spot, papley better scoring potential. I think risk it on Papley
I wish I could afford someone less dodgy... already have McCarthy, Milera, Bennedy, Kerridge so it's just that awful F8 spot.
Same, but it also seems a waste to have Milera and McCarthy both on my bemch. I also went Papley so I could Petracca to Gresham
You'd take Gresham over Hewett, yeah?
Yeah mate. That looks a given. Saints have big wraps on him. Hewett's JS looks a lot shakier.
I like both, Ive gone Gresham, Hewett and Davis on mid bench.
Pendles and Simpkin Vs Jelwood and B Crouch
hanners vs shiel
Quote from: frenzy on March 25, 2016, 03:37:05 PM
Pendles and Simpkin Vs Jelwood and B Crouch
Selwood and Crouch for sure
Quote from: frenzy on March 25, 2016, 03:37:05 PM
Pendles and Simpkin Vs Jelwood and B Crouch
Jelwood and B Crouch.
Greene v Hall (season average)
Quote from: GVSKiwi on March 25, 2016, 03:46:07 PM
Quote from: frenzy on March 25, 2016, 03:37:05 PM
Pendles and Simpkin Vs Jelwood and B Crouch
Jelwood and B Crouch.
Greene v Hall (season average)
I'd say Hall has the higher upside, but Greene will average more.
Cockatoo vs Petracca?
Boyd, Bartel & Smith
Vs
Laird, Bartel & Rich/Smith??
hanners vs shiel?
Quote from: GVSKiwi on March 25, 2016, 03:46:07 PM
Quote from: frenzy on March 25, 2016, 03:37:05 PM
Pendles and Simpkin Vs Jelwood and B Crouch
Jelwood and B Crouch.
Greene v Hall (season average)
Hall (98-105)
Greene (89-94)
Fyfe or Pendles
(I assume it's been asked but can't find it in 118 pages)
Quote from: Jayman on March 25, 2016, 01:26:10 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 12:53:06 PM
Lonergan vs Seedsman ( end of season average)
I think Lonergan is guaranteed mid time so will end up being the better pick.
Lonergan should be a great stepping stone up until bye and then see how he goes after that!
Kennedy and Papley/Hewitt
VS.
Gresham and McCarthy?
Quote from: caluuum on March 25, 2016, 04:45:04 PM
Fyfe or Pendles
(I assume it's been asked but can't find it in 118 pages)
Fyfe
500k or less mid + Crouch vs Robbie Gray + Mills
Quote from: NickyBoy on March 25, 2016, 05:34:34 PM
Quote from: caluuum on March 25, 2016, 04:45:04 PM
Fyfe or Pendles
(I assume it's been asked but can't find it in 118 pages)
Fyfe
500k or less mid + Crouch vs Robbie Gray + Mills
Gray and Mills, like the Gray Pod!
Last big dilemma for me:
Option 1: Libba, Crouch, Hartley and 87k (possibly for Hewett to Oliver at M10)
Option 2: Oliver, Crouch and Lonergan
Option 3A: Libba, Oliver and Longeran (downgrade Laird to Birchall)
Option 3B: Libba, Oliver and Lonergan (downgrade Danger to Robbie Gray)
Sorry if its confusing and cheers to anyone who responds!
[/quote]
Probably option 2
Quote from: tommy10 on March 25, 2016, 05:48:29 PM
Last big dilemma for me:
Option 1: Libba, Crouch, Hartley and 87k (possibly for Hewett to Oliver at M10)
Option 2: Oliver, Crouch and Lonergan
Option 3A: Libba, Oliver and Longeran (downgrade Laird to Birchall)
Option 3B: Libba, Oliver and Lonergan (downgrade Danger to Robbie Gray)
Sorry if its confusing and cheers to anyone who responds!
Cross out option 1, don't want to go in with Hartley.
Don't really like Birchall at all, and Danger is a much better option than Gray, so I'd do option 2!
Oliver + Bkennedy (m8&f5)
vs
BCrouch + Papley/Mcgovern (m7&f6)
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 25, 2016, 06:03:11 PM
Oliver + Bkennedy (m8&f5)
vs
BCrouch + Papley/Mcgovern (m7&f6)
Option 1 for sure.
macmillan v JJ V Rich
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 06:07:23 PM
macmillan v JJ V Rich
Rich looks like a really good pick up so I'd go him.
Bartel v Rich at D3
Rich allows me to put bennedy back into the forward line and pick up oliver over a say petracca, cockatoo
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 06:08:34 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 06:07:23 PM
macmillan v JJ V Rich
Rich looks like a really good pick up so I'd go him.
only thing that worries me is him getting tagged with beams out
With rookies now named, pick 2 of the following
Dunkley vs Hewett vs Gresham
Quote from: Keith Urban on March 25, 2016, 06:11:31 PM
Bartel v Rich at D3
Rich allows me to put bennedy back into the forward line and pick up oliver over a say petracca, cockatoo
I'd take Rich. Not sold on Bartel this year.
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 06:15:19 PM
Quote from: LaHug on March 25, 2016, 06:08:34 PM
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 06:07:23 PM
macmillan v JJ V Rich
Rich looks like a really good pick up so I'd go him.
only thing that worries me is him getting tagged with beams out
Legitimate fear but I think it's worth the risk at his price. Just my opinion though.
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 06:07:23 PM
macmillan v JJ V Rich
JJ for me, then macmillan and Rich.
Hanley is just as if not more damaging then Rich so they will look to shut him down as well. Teams generally won't tag more then 1 guy.
Who would you guys pick out of Dahlhaus and Hall?
Forget the cost, just the points/average!
Quote from: Holz on March 25, 2016, 11:39:43 AM
Quote from: almonds on March 25, 2016, 11:26:13 AM
J.Lonergan v P.Seedsman
lonergan will probably outscore him in the first 8 weeks so if you want a stepping stone lonergan. if you want a keeper then seedsman i think will beat him over a season.
what about if sheridan is thrown into the mix??
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 25, 2016, 06:17:14 PM
With rookies now named, pick 2 of the following
Dunkley vs Hewett vs Gresham
Gresham > Hewett > Dunkley
Quote from: jfitty on March 25, 2016, 06:23:07 PM
Who would you guys pick out of Dahlhaus and Hall?
Forget the cost, just the points/average!
Dahl
Quote from: Mat0369 on March 25, 2016, 06:24:40 PM
Quote from: jfitty on March 25, 2016, 06:23:07 PM
Who would you guys pick out of Dahlhaus and Hall?
Forget the cost, just the points/average!
Dahl
Yep definitely dahl
Help Please....
1. Boyd, Bartel, Smith
Vs
2. Laird, Bartel, Rich/Smith
Vs
3. Shaw, Rich, Lonergan
Vs
4. Shaw, Bartel, Lonergan
Quote from: Elcapitano on March 25, 2016, 06:54:51 PM
Help Please....
1. Boyd, Bartel, Smith
Vs
2. Laird, Bartel, Rich/Smith
Vs
3. Shaw, Rich, Lonergan
Vs
4. Shaw, Bartel, Lonergan
3 for me. Shaw is a must have and I prefer Rich over old man Bartel.
Libba, Shiel, Gresham
vs
B.Crouch, Parker, Oliver
JJ V Rich
Gresham and McCarthy OR Kennedy and Hewitt/Dunkley? :-\
Hannes v shiel v Parker
KK/Laird/Bartel and Bennedy v Lonergan and DeGoey
Seedsman vs. Lonergan
McCarthy vs Milera
Quote from: backpocket on March 25, 2016, 07:57:08 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on March 25, 2016, 07:53:09 PM
McCarthy vs Milera
mccarthy
jacobs v martin
I would like to hear more opinions regarding Milera and McCarthy. I currently have Milera, but wondering if maybe it's better to with with McCarthy as his JS may be a bit better, although scoring a bit less. Extra cash could be handy though, but can always make a corrective trade.
Oh, and Big Stefan!
Lemmens V Mckenzie or a neither really worth it.
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2016, 08:00:38 PM
Lemmens V Mckenzie or a neither really worth it.
Mckenzie or Mackenzie? Either way, I wouldn't take Lemmens :P
Quote from: GoLions on March 25, 2016, 08:01:19 PM
Quote from: Money Shot on March 25, 2016, 08:00:38 PM
Lemmens V Mckenzie or a neither really worth it.
Mckenzie or Mackenzie? Either way, I wouldn't take Lemmens :P
Mackenzie oops!
And I don't know I feel he could lift his average ::)
Libba and Seedsman or Crouch and Lonergan?
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on March 25, 2016, 08:11:22 PM
Libba and Seedsman or Crouch and Lonergan?
libba and seddsman
Quote from: Bluesalltheway on March 25, 2016, 08:11:22 PM
Libba and Seedsman or Crouch and Lonergan?
Crouch and Lonergan
Gresham & Goetz or Hewett & Grimley
Oliver + Bkennedy (m8&f5)
vs
BCrouch + Papley/Mcgovern (m7&f6
Wilson V Harwood V McDonald
rate them please.
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 25, 2016, 09:56:08 PM
Oliver + Bkennedy (m8&f5)
vs
BCrouch + Papley/Mcgovern (m7&f6
Libba + Hall
vs
B. Crouch + S. Gray
Leaning Crouch/Gray; wondering who everyone is higher on out of Crouch and Hall.
Shaw+Dunkley
Bartel/Mcdonald + Parish
Quote from: mzunguman on March 25, 2016, 10:40:21 PM
Shaw+Dunkley
Bartel/Mcdonald + Parish
Shaw + Dunkley without a doubt
DeGoey v Steele? (May have already been asked)
1. Boyd + Lonergan + Robbo
2. Shaw + Lonergan + Hall
3. Murphy/Gibson + Bartel + Hall
Really want Robbo over Hall but not sure I'm comfortable with any of the other premo defenders, particularly Boyd. Laird is my D2 for what it's worth.
Mccarthy + Hewett/Dunkley
vs
Oliver + Mcgovern/Papley
also Mcgovern vs Papley and
Hewett vs Dunkley
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2016, 11:05:03 PM
1. Boyd + Lonergan + Robbo
2. Shaw + Lonergan + Hall
3. Murphy/Gibson + Bartel + Hall
Really want Robbo over Hall but not sure I'm comfortable with any of the other premo defenders, particularly Boyd. Laird is my D2 for what it's worth.
2 for mine. I really like hall
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2016, 11:05:03 PM
1. Boyd + Lonergan + Robbo
2. Shaw + Lonergan + Hall
3. Murphy/Gibson + Bartel + Hall
Really want Robbo over Hall but not sure I'm comfortable with any of the other premo defenders, particularly Boyd. Laird is my D2 for what it's worth.
Didn't realise Dunkley was so cheap, therefore I've narrowed it down to:
Gresham + Hall vs Dunkley + Robbo
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 25, 2016, 11:05:29 PM
Milera/Mccarthy + Hewett/Dunkley
vs
Oliver + Mcgovern/Papley
also Mcgovern vs Papley and
Hewett vs Dunkley
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 26, 2016, 12:00:19 AM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2016, 11:05:03 PM
1. Boyd + Lonergan + Robbo
2. Shaw + Lonergan + Hall
3. Murphy/Gibson + Bartel + Hall
Really want Robbo over Hall but not sure I'm comfortable with any of the other premo defenders, particularly Boyd. Laird is my D2 for what it's worth.
Didn't realise Dunkley was so cheap, therefore I've narrowed it down to:
Gresham + Hall vs Dunkley + Robbo
Would really prefer Robbo over Hall, especially with Beams out early
Have always picked rookies before premiums though, so Gresham + Hall it is...
Quote from: Big Mac on March 26, 2016, 12:26:42 AM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 26, 2016, 12:00:19 AM
Quote from: Rusty00 on March 25, 2016, 11:05:03 PM
1. Boyd + Lonergan + Robbo
2. Shaw + Lonergan + Hall
3. Murphy/Gibson + Bartel + Hall
Really want Robbo over Hall but not sure I'm comfortable with any of the other premo defenders, particularly Boyd. Laird is my D2 for what it's worth.
Didn't realise Dunkley was so cheap, therefore I've narrowed it down to:
Gresham + Hall vs Dunkley + Robbo
Would really prefer Robbo over Hall, especially with Beams out early
Have always picked rookies before premiums though, so Gresham + Hall it is...
Yeah that's my dilemma, really want Robbo but leaves me with Dunkley and very little money for any correction trades :-\
Gibson vs Macmillan
Do I take the veteran in gibbo or the breakout contender in Macmillan?
Hewett & Zorko (from next week of course)
vs
Mills & Hall
Already have gresh, dunkley, davis.
Naitanui or gawn, my last decision, thanks
Quote from: GVSKiwi on March 26, 2016, 12:56:29 AM
Hewett & Zorko (from next week of course)
vs
Mills & Hall
Already have gresh, dunkley, davis.
Mills and Hall.
Laird + Oliver + Bennedy
vs
Crouch + Seedsman + Bennedy
vs
Laird + Crouch + Papley vs Mcgovern
Quote from: WizzFizz on March 26, 2016, 01:07:32 AM
Laird + Oliver + Bennedy
vs
Crouch + Seedsman + Bennedy
vs
Laird + Crouch + Papley vs Mcgovern
Option 1, Laird and Bennedy are must haves
rich/cowan v seedsman /harwood
Quote from: crowls on March 26, 2016, 01:59:29 AM
rich/cowan v seedsman /harwood
Seeds and Harwood
Lonergan, Hewett + 70k vs JJ + Dunkley
Quote from: tommy10 on March 26, 2016, 02:20:39 AM
Quote from: crowls on March 26, 2016, 01:59:29 AM
rich/cowan v seedsman /harwood
Seeds and Harwood
Lonergan, Hewett + 70k vs JJ + Dunkley
Lonergan, Hewett
Robinson/Smith vs S.Gray/Rich
sam gray vs toby greene for F2?
Quote from: Gambino on March 26, 2016, 03:30:44 AM
Robinson/Smith vs S.Gray/Rich
Gray > robbo
Smith > rich
Prefer one of each if that helps haha
If i had to choose however id go robbo and smith
Quote from: tttt on March 26, 2016, 04:20:56 AM
sam gray vs toby greene for F2?
Gray
S.Gray/Harwood vs Hall/Lonergan
Ward vs S.Gray
Gray been named in the midfield on the team sheets.
Would allow me to go jacobs to martin and also sure up any rookies like pectracca to milera/cocky
Choice of demons
BKennedy v Oliver
Seedsman vs Mckenzie
Hall vs gray
Quote from: Keeper27 on March 26, 2016, 08:46:07 AM
Seedsman vs Mckenzie
Hall vs gray
Prob Seed and Hall
Laird v KK?
S. Gray and Hartley (D8) vs. Bennedy and Rich/Lonergan
Any feedback would be awesome! Last decision to make :o
Fyfe + Hewett
OR
Libba + Sam Gray
(Already have Simpkin, Mills, Oliver, Gresham + Davis. Plus Menadue, Bennedy and Kerridge forwards)
Rookie question.
Gresham and Petracca vs Dunkley and McCarthy?
Quote from: baz1 on March 26, 2016, 10:02:54 AM
S. Gray and Hartley (D8) vs. Bennedy and Rich/Lonergan
Any feedback would be awesome! Last decision to make :o
Kennedy + Rich
Quote from: newfreofan on March 26, 2016, 10:27:36 AM
Fyfe + Hewett
OR
Libba + Sam Gray
(Already have Simpkin, Mills, Oliver, Gresham + Davis. Plus Menadue, Bennedy and Kerridge forwards)
Fyfe and Hewett
Quote from: Bones Bombers on March 26, 2016, 10:33:15 AM
Rookie question.
Gresham and Petracca vs Dunkley and McCarthy?
Gresham and Petracca (Dunkley no JS)
Last selection trouble in my team...
Priddis v Ablett
Burger and crouch vs Sinclair and Oliver
De goey vs steele
Quote from: fasttrack13 on March 26, 2016, 10:44:54 AM
Last selection trouble in my team...
Priddis v Ablett
While I understand the difficulty, with no NAB for Ablett, gotta have Gaz.
Quote from: fasttrack13 on March 26, 2016, 10:44:10 AM
Quote from: baz1 on March 26, 2016, 10:02:54 AM
S. Gray and Hartley (D8) vs. Bennedy and Rich/Lonergan
Any feedback would be awesome! Last decision to make :o
Kennedy + Rich
Quote from: newfreofan on March 26, 2016, 10:27:36 AM
Fyfe + Hewett
OR
Libba + Sam Gray
(Already have Simpkin, Mills, Oliver, Gresham + Davis. Plus Menadue, Bennedy and Kerridge forwards)
Fyfe and Hewett
Quote from: Bones Bombers on March 26, 2016, 10:33:15 AM
Rookie question.
Gresham and Petracca vs Dunkley and McCarthy?
Gresham and Petracca (Dunkley no JS)
Thanks for that mate - whats your thinking behind no S. Gray? Big end to last year and impressive NAB?
Mummy & Jelwood v Shiel & Stef Martin
Shiel and Martin..just (only because of mummys durability)
Papley and Hanners vs crouch and rich
Laird + Oliver + Bennedy
vs
Crouch + Seedsman + Bennedy
vs
Laird + Crouch + Papley vs Mcgovern
Quote from: _wato on March 26, 2016, 10:49:41 AM
Mummy & Jelwood v Shiel & Stef Martin
Shiel + Martin for sure, less inury prone and both have had full preseason
Last decision of my team to be made so please help me out.
Who and why?
De Goey + Hewett vs Simpkin + Oliver
I would prefer De Goey over Simpkin as he could go close to a keeper average but not sure on Hewetts job security.
Quote from: cortez on March 26, 2016, 11:16:03 AM
Last decision of my team to be made so please help me out.
Who and why?
De Goey + Hewett vs Simpkin + Oliver
I would prefer De Goey over Simpkin as he could go close to a keeper average but not sure on Hewetts job security.
Not really a fan of either but id go option 1
Shaw + Eric Mckenzie + Mills vs Rich + Laird + Hewett
One of Hewett Gresham Dunkley Davis would be starting everyweek with second option
Quote from: LordSneeze on March 26, 2016, 11:25:04 AM
Quote from: cortez on March 26, 2016, 11:16:03 AM
Last decision of my team to be made so please help me out.
Who and why?
De Goey + Hewett vs Simpkin + Oliver
I would prefer De Goey over Simpkin as he could go close to a keeper average but not sure on Hewetts job security.
Not really a fan of either but id go option 1
oliver vs hewett and $$$
Fyfe and papley (or another forward rookie under 125) or Parker and Milera?
My last decision aswell
2 of
Hewett - Gresham - Davis
Quote from: ando_10 on March 26, 2016, 11:28:51 AM
oliver vs hewett and $$$
Depends what your using the extra cash for
Quote from: LordSneeze on March 26, 2016, 11:30:21 AM
My last decision aswell
2 of
Hewett - Gresham - Davis
Gresham Davis no question
Quote from: Blairholt on March 26, 2016, 11:26:00 AM
Shaw + Eric Mckenzie + Mills vs Rich, Laird, Hewett
One of Hewett Gresham Dunkley Davis would be starting everyweek with second option
Option 1, but any options other than Mckenzie?
Quote from: ando_10 on March 26, 2016, 11:28:51 AM
oliver vs hewett and $$$
Oliver unless you need the cash for elsewhere
Quote from: essendon on March 26, 2016, 11:29:22 AM
Fyfe and papley (or another forward rookie under 125) or Parker and Milera?
Fyfe/Papley unless you need someone on field in Fwd
Quote from: TomK on March 26, 2016, 11:32:40 AM
Quote from: LordSneeze on March 26, 2016, 11:30:21 AM
My last decision aswell
2 of
Hewett - Gresham - Davis
Gresham Davis no question
That was my thinking too.
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
shiel and crouch v libba and rich
Quote from: almonds on March 26, 2016, 11:45:28 AM
shiel and crouch v libba and rich
Shiel and Crouch
Shaw Lonergan Hewett vs Boyd Seedsman Oliver(M9) this week as I started Menadue at M8.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 26, 2016, 11:49:02 AM
Quote from: almonds on March 26, 2016, 11:45:28 AM
shiel and crouch v libba and rich
Shiel and Crouch
Shaw Lonergan Hewett vs Boyd Seedsman Oliver(M9) this week as I started Menadue at M8.
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 11:37:21 AM
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
I actually think Boyd Parish Gray as ur fwd mate...just
Macaffer vs Hewett + 77k?
Not a bad option for M9 and JS would be good
Quote from: tommy10 on March 26, 2016, 11:55:39 AM
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 11:37:21 AM
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
I actually think Boyd Parish Gray as ur fwd mate...just
Macaffer vs Hewett + 77k?
Not a bad option for M9 and JS would be good
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 11:58:40 AM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 26, 2016, 11:55:39 AM
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 11:37:21 AM
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
I actually think Boyd Parish Gray as ur fwd mate...just
Macaffer vs Hewett + 77k?
Not a bad option for M9 and JS would be good
So in effect it comes to Lonergan and Macaffer vs Seedsman and Oliver. Have Shaw at D1 but can only get Oliver if I either downgrade Shaw to Boyd or Lonergan to Seedsman
Shaw, Laird, Lonergan?, Weits, Dea, Brown (Tipa, Adams)
JPK + Hewett + Cockatoo
Vs.
Prestia + Mils + Petracca
Ward (M5)+ Sauce + Papley/McGovern (F9) vs S.Gray (M5) + S.Martin + Milera (F8)
Gray been named in the mids for port and i will swing him forward when doing upgrades. Extra money will just give me more security on the bench. Prefer martin over jacobs and this is the only way i can get him in.
Quote from: Jayman on March 26, 2016, 12:09:22 PM
JPK + Hewett + Cockatoo
Vs.
Prestia + Mils + Petracca
Tough one. I think mills is a must but prestia has had no preseason. Both petracca and cocky out atm.
Would take option 2 if you can replace prestia for another mid around the same price which you prefer.
Quote from: Jayman on March 26, 2016, 12:09:22 PM
JPK + Hewett + Cockatoo
Vs.
Prestia + Mils + Petracca
Option 2
Dea and Hanners vs Harwood and Wines
parish/bennedy or mills/milera m8 and f7 started menadue and kerridge
One last spot to fill, and it has me stumped. Can be defense, or fwd if I swing tippa to backs and lose my fwd/def link. $145,000 to spend.
So it's McGovern vs Papley vs Hartley (not playing). I think Hartley has to be close to selection, but I already have a R3 donut, so not sure if it's worth the risk?
Quote from: no eye deer on March 26, 2016, 12:32:18 PM
One last spot to fill, and it has me stumped. Can be defense, or fwd if I swing tippa to backs and lose my fwd/def link. $145,000 to spend.
So it's McGovern vs Papley vs Hartley (not playing). I think Hartley has to be close to selection, but I already have a R3 donut, so not sure if it's worth the risk?
I'd go Papley out of those 3. Don't want to carry Hartley if he doesn't get named, and I think Papley has slightly better JS than McGovern
What order for:
Jacobs vs S.Martin vs NicNat
Cutler vs. Seedsman?
L parker + m robinson vs. Pendles + T Greene?
Quote from: BLBBLB on March 26, 2016, 12:45:38 PM
Cutler vs. Seedsman?
L parker + m robinson vs. Pendles + T Greene?
pendles greene and seedsman
Lonergan v seedsman
Quote from: almonds on March 26, 2016, 12:52:24 PM
Lonergan v seedsman
Lonergan
Order for nicnat jacobs and s.martin?
Shiel + Parker + L McCarthy vs. Pendles + T Greene + Hewett and 60k to spend elsewhere.
Quote from: BLBBLB on March 26, 2016, 01:07:44 PM
Shiel + Parker + L McCarthy vs. Pendles + T Greene + Hewett and 60k to spend elsewhere.
Pendles S.Gray Hewett + 20k
Second guessing all my choices thanks to hartley
Danger vs ablett
Ward vs shiel
Laird vs roberton
Quote from: BLBBLB on March 26, 2016, 01:07:44 PM
Shiel + Parker + L McCarthy vs. Pendles + T Greene + Hewett and 60k to spend elsewhere.
id probably do the second option although both seem quite good. now i have one...
De goey + Crouch vs Mid premo + rookie
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 26, 2016, 01:14:40 PM
De goey + Crouch vs Mid premo + rookie
I really like Crouch, but would have to go with the second option, if the premium is really high end, like 600k, and the rookie has reasonable js as well. I'm not convinced that de Goey will deliver simply based off nab form, and always avoid second year players regardless.
Starting to worry a bit about the js of some of these rookies, and the freedom that shaw will get. So wondering about:
eMac + Yeo v Shaw + Papley?
Quote from: dicko_ on March 26, 2016, 01:25:20 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 26, 2016, 01:14:40 PM
De goey + Crouch vs Mid premo + rookie
I really like Crouch, but would have to go with the second option, if the premium is really high end, like 600k, and the rookie has reasonable js as well. I'm not convinced that de Goey will deliver simply based off nab form, and always avoid second year players regardless.
Starting to worry a bit about the js of some of these rookies, and the freedom that shaw will get. So wondering about:
eMac + Yeo v Shaw + Papley?
Shaw and papley. Getting a top 3 defender
Danger vs ablett
Ward vs shiel vs selwood
Laird vs roberton
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 01:29:11 PM
Quote from: dicko_ on March 26, 2016, 01:25:20 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 26, 2016, 01:14:40 PM
De goey + Crouch vs Mid premo + rookie
I really like Crouch, but would have to go with the second option, if the premium is really high end, like 600k, and the rookie has reasonable js as well. I'm not convinced that de Goey will deliver simply based off nab form, and always avoid second year players regardless.
Starting to worry a bit about the js of some of these rookies, and the freedom that shaw will get. So wondering about:
eMac + Yeo v Shaw + Papley?
Shaw and papley. Getting a top 3 defender
Danger vs ablett
Ward vs shiel vs selwood
Laird vs roberton
which 3 rookies to pick for m9-m11
Petrecca, Dunkley, Davis, Gresham, Hewett,
I was leaning towards Davis, Gresham and Dunkley. Thoughts?
Quote from: NickyBoy on March 26, 2016, 01:32:45 PM
which 3 rookies to pick for m9-m11
Petrecca, Dunkley, Davis, Gresham, Hewett,
I was leaning towards Davis, Gresham and Dunkley. Thoughts?
Id pick Hewett over Dunkley, however i dont exactly know enough about Dunkley
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 12:37:11 PM
What order for:
Jacobs vs S.Martin vs NicNat
I reckon Martin, NN, Sauce
sorry, annoying me a bit,
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 01:53:36 PM
sorry, annoying me a bit,
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
Can you afford Seedsman over Bugg?
I'd still probably take Option 1.
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 01:53:36 PM
sorry, annoying me a bit,
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
probably second option
however could you do something like this?
a bartel (or someone cheaper), Crouch (if u dont have him) + merrett/gray ???
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 26, 2016, 02:00:06 PM
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 01:53:36 PM
sorry, annoying me a bit,
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
probably second option
however could you do something like this?
a bartel (or someone cheaper), Crouch (if u dont have him) + merrett/gray ???
have bartel and crouch, thinking of just locking in option 1 and hoping bugg can produce. great early draw
Martin vs NN vs Gawn. Second thoughts now.... :-\ Did put Gawn ahead of NN becuase of better early draw but not sure now.
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 02:02:03 PM
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 26, 2016, 02:00:06 PM
Quote from: Jackross10 on March 26, 2016, 01:53:36 PM
sorry, annoying me a bit,
bugg, pendles, simpkin
vs
boyd, parish, 510k fwd
probably second option
however could you do something like this?
a bartel (or someone cheaper), Crouch (if u dont have him) + merrett/gray ???
have bartel and crouch, thinking of just locking in option 1 and hoping bugg can produce. great early draw
Yeah, he is actually quite cheap considering his potential
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 12:24:37 PM
Quote from: Jayman on March 26, 2016, 12:09:22 PM
JPK + Hewett + Cockatoo
Vs.
Prestia + Mils + Petracca
Tough one. I think mills is a must but prestia has had no preseason. Both petracca and cocky out atm.
Would take option 2 if you can replace prestia for another mid around the same price which you prefer.
Yeah I could get Shiel instead of Prestia... Decision is mainly about whether I should start with Petracca & if Mills is a must.
S.Gray v Z. Merrett v any forward under 588k (apart from hall and barlow)
Ward vs selwood
Already have danger so wondering if having both him and selwood is too much?
Also unsure about picking him off no preseason with only one scratch match
That extra 8k will allow me to go NN to S.Martin
Cheers
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 02:20:51 PM
Ward vs selwood
Already have danger so wondering if having both him and selwood is too much?
Also unsure about picking him off no preseason with only one scratch match
That extra 8k will allow me to go NN to S.Martin
Cheers
Selwood killed it in the practice match so he's ready. NN to Martin will be better. Martin gets more possies
Lonergan and Gawn vs Seedsman and Martin
Quote from: tommy10 on March 26, 2016, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 02:20:51 PM
Ward vs selwood
Already have danger so wondering if having both him and selwood is too much?
Also unsure about picking him off no preseason with only one scratch match
That extra 8k will allow me to go NN to S.Martin
Cheers
Selwood killed it in the practice match so he's ready. NN to Martin will be better. Martin gets more possies
Lonergan and Gawn vs Seedsman and Martin
So you think its alright to start both selwood and danger?
Lonergan and gawn for me
Martin is the better ruck but lonergan the better back. Think lonergan will outscore seedsman by more than martin will outscore gawn.
Pendles & Priddis & Hartley (bank on coming in soon and make up points with Rockliff at M6)
vs
Fyfe & Laird & Hewett
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 02:28:54 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 26, 2016, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 02:20:51 PM
Ward vs selwood
Already have danger so wondering if having both him and selwood is too much?
Also unsure about picking him off no preseason with only one scratch match
That extra 8k will allow me to go NN to S.Martin
Cheers
Selwood killed it in the practice match so he's ready. NN to Martin will be better. Martin gets more possies
Lonergan and Gawn vs Seedsman and Martin
So you think its alright to start both selwood and danger?
Lonergan and gawn for me
Martin is the better ruck but lonergan the better back. Think lonergan will outscore seedsman by more than martin will outscore gawn.
Thanks man. Go with your gut but I think Jelwood is a good POD..Danger may get tagged but will kill it anyway as seen in nab, but will free up Jelwood.
Quote from: tommy10 on March 26, 2016, 02:37:25 PM
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 02:28:54 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on March 26, 2016, 02:24:57 PM
Quote from: steven3 on March 26, 2016, 02:20:51 PM
Ward vs selwood
Already have danger so wondering if having both him and selwood is too much?
Also unsure about picking him off no preseason with only one scratch match
That extra 8k will allow me to go NN to S.Martin
Cheers
Selwood killed it in the practice match so he's ready. NN to Martin will be better. Martin gets more possies
Lonergan and Gawn vs Seedsman and Martin
So you think its alright to start both selwood and danger?
Lonergan and gawn for me
Martin is the better ruck but lonergan the better back. Think lonergan will outscore seedsman by more than martin will outscore gawn.
Thanks man. Go with your gut but I think Jelwood is a good POD..Danger may get tagged but will kill it anyway as seen in nab, but will free up Jelwood.
No worries cheers mate
Lobbe + A. Hall vs Luey + Buddy
Quote from: Samsturmfels on March 26, 2016, 02:13:20 PM
S.Gray v Z. Merrett v any forward under 588k (apart from hall and barlow)
?
Luey vs Lobbe
Jelwood or Wines?
Hey fellas just after opinions on
Harwood n popley
Vs
Mckenzie (wc) n McCarthy
2nd option better job security but Harwood role not a bad one if he holds a spot
Birchall vs Bartel??
Taking out the game where Bartel got injured last season, he wouldve averaged 95.8
Will Birch's average lift with a bit of midfield time?
Quote from: mjbur13 on March 27, 2016, 01:21:43 AM
Birchall vs Bartel??
Taking out the game where Bartel got injured last season, he wouldve averaged 95.8
Will Birch's average lift with a bit of midfield time?
Bartel for sure
Rich vs Yeo (sorry if already asked, too many posts to read all)
Robbie Gray vs Rockliff??
Harwood vs Cutler
Quote from: freddo81 on March 27, 2016, 08:14:22 AM
Robbie Gray vs Rockliff??
Rocky... At a bargain price!!
Rich vs Bartel purely points wise..
Robinson vs westhoff
Quote from: backpocket on March 27, 2016, 02:06:10 PM
Robinson vs westhoff
Given that Robbo is on report and injured, Hoff
Quote from: fanTCfool on March 28, 2016, 04:20:43 PM
Quote from: backpocket on March 27, 2016, 02:06:10 PM
Robinson vs westhoff
Given that Robbo is on report and injured, Hoff
Given that this was asked at 1pm yesterday, I think you're a tad late ;D
Nothing in Robbo's report though FWIW
Quote from: GoLions on March 28, 2016, 04:22:08 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on March 28, 2016, 04:20:43 PM
Quote from: backpocket on March 27, 2016, 02:06:10 PM
Robinson vs westhoff
Given that Robbo is on report and injured, Hoff
Given that this was asked at 1pm yesterday, I think you're a tad late ;D
Nothing in Robbo's report though FWIW
And as I say that, he's been cleared 8)
Draft question, not sure if there is a board for this?
Roberton vs Sheridan?
Currently have Roberton and nobody picked up Sheridan!
Kerridge v Parish?
Quote from: The Supercoach on March 28, 2016, 11:01:53 PM
Draft question, not sure if there is a board for this?
Roberton vs Sheridan?
Currently have Roberton and nobody picked up Sheridan!
Keep Robbo
Fyfe + Robinson v Priddis and Zorko/Dalhaus
Quote from: mzunguman on March 29, 2016, 05:25:25 PM
Fyfe + Robinson v Priddis and Zorko/Dalhaus
Priddis and Dahlhaus
Hall vs Zac Merret
I think Zac will be around 80/90
While hall will fluctuate from anywhere from 60 to 120
Probably hall for me
Quote from: Gambino on March 30, 2016, 02:04:15 AM
Hall vs Zac Merret
Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 30, 2016, 09:16:08 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)
Parker.
Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.
However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 09:57:05 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 30, 2016, 09:16:08 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)
Parker.
Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.
However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.
Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:02:20 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 09:57:05 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 30, 2016, 09:16:08 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)
Parker.
Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.
However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.
Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?
Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.
I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 10:05:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:02:20 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 09:57:05 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 30, 2016, 09:16:08 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)
Parker.
Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.
However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.
Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?
Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.
I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!
Looking at last year, Wingard and Parker had a similar floor, but Parker obviously had a higher and somewhat more consistent ceiling??
Still tossing up which one!
But I don't think Kerridge, Kennedy and Menadue should have much trouble about JS if they can keep up reasonable form say 70/80ish
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:11:48 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 10:05:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:02:20 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 09:57:05 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 30, 2016, 09:16:08 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)
Parker.
Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.
However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.
Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?
Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.
I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!
Looking at last year, Wingard and Parker had a similar floor, but Parker obviously had a higher and somewhat more consistent ceiling??
Still tossing up which one!
But I don't think Kerridge, Kennedy and Menadue should have much trouble about JS if they can keep up reasonable form say 70/80ish
Yeah I'm not worried to much about JS, more so consistent scoring ability
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 10:13:47 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:11:48 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 10:05:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:02:20 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 09:57:05 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 30, 2016, 09:16:08 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)
Parker.
Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.
However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.
Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?
Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.
I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!
Looking at last year, Wingard and Parker had a similar floor, but Parker obviously had a higher and somewhat more consistent ceiling??
Still tossing up which one!
But I don't think Kerridge, Kennedy and Menadue should have much trouble about JS if they can keep up reasonable form say 70/80ish
Yeah I'm not worried to much about JS, more so consistent scoring ability
Kerridge looked pretty good, as did Kennedy.... Menadue would be the only one I would have concerns over
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:17:00 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 10:13:47 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:11:48 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 10:05:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 10:02:20 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on March 30, 2016, 09:57:05 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on March 30, 2016, 09:16:08 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on March 30, 2016, 09:09:42 PM
Wingard (F3) or Parker (M6)
Parker.
Player v player I agree. Parker will score more. And at his price he is a bargain.
However Parker at M6 is strong and only leaves 2 spots for mid pricers or rookies. It also means his forward line is potentially weak from F3-6. I think there are better options for M6-8 who will score well (ie Libba, crouch, mills, Oliver) as opposed to fwd options available.
Thanks Guys, yeah I think I'm leaning towards Wingard otherwise my forward line will be something like Martin, Barlow, Wells, Bennedy, Menadue, Kerridge
Which is probably 1 too many rookies to have on? Unless these guys will keep getting games?
Similar to mine, although I have Hall instead of Dusty so technically weaker than yours. Strong R1 for the like of Wells, Bennedy, Kerridge and Menadue, but I'm nervous about relying on them every week. Waiting for them to ripen.
I should say that if Parker scores well again this week I will be looking to find a way to get him in!
Looking at last year, Wingard and Parker had a similar floor, but Parker obviously had a higher and somewhat more consistent ceiling??
Still tossing up which one!
But I don't think Kerridge, Kennedy and Menadue should have much trouble about JS if they can keep up reasonable form say 70/80ish
Yeah I'm not worried to much about JS, more so consistent scoring ability
Kerridge looked pretty good, as did Kennedy.... Menadue would be the only one I would have concerns over
Yeah Kerridge looked good but kicking was very poor. Bennedy I didn't see. Menadue scored well but agree I'm mostly concerned about him week in and week out
Hall vs Zorko?
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 01, 2016, 10:59:07 AM
Hall vs Zorko?
Hall... Should score similar but he is a lot cheaper! Zorko could possibly be playing more up forward this year which could yo-yo his scores
Quote from: mzunguman on April 01, 2016, 11:07:26 AM
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 01, 2016, 10:59:07 AM
Hall vs Zorko?
Hall... Should score similar but he is a lot cheaper! Zorko could possibly be playing more up forward this year which could yo-yo his scores
With the interchange cap he'll be spending plenty of time in the midfield. Think Leppa said this as well.
Quote from: GoLions on April 01, 2016, 11:10:07 AM
Quote from: mzunguman on April 01, 2016, 11:07:26 AM
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 01, 2016, 10:59:07 AM
Hall vs Zorko?
Hall... Should score similar but he is a lot cheaper! Zorko could possibly be playing more up forward this year which could yo-yo his scores
With the interchange cap he'll be spending plenty of time in the midfield. Think Leppa said this as well.
Well.... I like Zorko more then lol
Quote from: mzunguman on April 01, 2016, 11:14:24 AM
Quote from: GoLions on April 01, 2016, 11:10:07 AM
Quote from: mzunguman on April 01, 2016, 11:07:26 AM
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 01, 2016, 10:59:07 AM
Hall vs Zorko?
Hall... Should score similar but he is a lot cheaper! Zorko could possibly be playing more up forward this year which could yo-yo his scores
With the interchange cap he'll be spending plenty of time in the midfield. Think Leppa said this as well.
Well.... I like Zorko more then lol
Leppa has said he anticipates Zorks spending 90% in midfield.
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 01, 2016, 10:59:07 AM
Hall vs Zorko?
Zorko for mine. He's got the runs on board and should spend plenty of time in the midfield
Quote from: jfitty on April 01, 2016, 11:52:34 AM
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 01, 2016, 10:59:07 AM
Hall vs Zorko?
Zorko for mine. He's got the runs on board and should spend plenty of time in the midfield
+1 for me Jfitty!
Smitchell v Priddis
Johannisen v Gray v Priddis.
Johannisen means Papley has to start at F6.
Gray/Priddis means Dea starts at D6.
Quote from: mzunguman on April 04, 2016, 09:37:12 AM
Smitchell v Priddis
Priddis for me
Quote from: billnats on April 04, 2016, 12:09:02 PM
Johannisen v Gray v Priddis.
Johannisen means Papley has to start at F6.
Gray/Priddis means Dea starts at D6.
Gray > Priddis > JJ
JJ or Z.Merrett?
Quote from: SilverLion on April 04, 2016, 01:17:20 PM
JJ or Z.Merrett?
JJ
McGovern vs Parish vs Hewett (for Gresham) Already have Papley.
Don't have either Ben Kennedy or Papley, who is more important to have out of the two?
Quote from: Bubbles on April 05, 2016, 11:34:55 AM
Don't have either Ben Kennedy or Papley, who is more important to have out of the two?
Think you need both. However for quick extra cash Papley, for JS and potentially a solid F7 BenKen. Papley won't continue this scoring much longer I don't think.
Zorko v Hall + $115k
Quote from: _wato on April 05, 2016, 11:40:13 AM
Zorko v Hall + $115k
You'll probably want both but get Hall now before price change and give Zorko one more week to impress.
Hall or JJ? Missed on both, one of an increasing stack of issues for my team!
Quote from: My Chumps on April 05, 2016, 12:51:36 PM
Hall or JJ? Missed on both, one of an increasing stack of issues for my team!
Hall as a fwd but spending all his time in the guts is gold !!
Bartel vs JJ??
Quote from: no eye deer on April 05, 2016, 07:53:38 AM
Quote from: SilverLion on April 04, 2016, 01:17:20 PM
JJ or Z.Merrett?
JJ
McGovern vs Parish vs Hewett (for Gresham) Already have Papley.
Parish>McGovern>Hewett better js and overall points scorer. hopefully hold till late season trades
Bit different
Rocky vs Barlow (on who to trade out)
Quote from: almonds on April 05, 2016, 10:22:52 PM
Bit different
Rocky vs Barlow (on who to trade out)
I am holding both, dont want to waste trades and have all necessary rooks. Not unreasonable to expect both to improve. Having said that unless Freo move Barlow back to mids he will have to go. So wait until teams are announced. Also probably need to hold and see if Freo move him back cause who can trust team lists anymore.
Quote from: almonds on April 05, 2016, 10:22:52 PM
Bit different
Rocky vs Barlow (on who to trade out)
Rocky has to go. Injury concerns through preseason, and now out. Need to seem him get through a decent block of footy before we bring him back in now
Looking at a POD for Rockliff:
Tom Mitchell vs Cal Ward vs Mark Blicavs
Mitchell is possibly my first choice, reckon this will be the year he puts it together and could average 110-115. Will always fly under the radar with Parker, Hannebery and Kennedy around.
Had Ward the last 2 seasons and know what to expect. Does throw in quite a few 80-90 scores but makes it up with some 140+ ones.
Blicavs I've added only because I could eventually swing him into the rucks (have Goldy and a mid pricer)
Quote from: jfitty on April 06, 2016, 11:23:35 AM
Looking at a POD for Rockliff:
Tom Mitchell vs Cal Ward vs Mark Blicavs
Mitchell is possibly my first choice, reckon this will be the year he puts it together and could average 110-115. Will always fly under the radar with Parker, Hannebery and Kennedy around.
Had Ward the last 2 seasons and know what to expect. Does throw in quite a few 80-90 scores but makes it up with some 140+ ones.
Blicavs I've added only because I could eventually swing him into the rucks (have Goldy and a mid pricer)
I think Blicavs could be worth a genuine look, he seems to be following on from last year nicely with two nice scores, even when the Cats got done, and as you have a Mid Price ruck he could come in handy later.
TMitchell, annoyed I didn't nab him. Averaged 110 last season unsubbed. Total ball magnet.
Mitch > Blitz > Ward
Hannebery v Priddis v Gray
gunston v dusty
5 Premo mids are Fyfe, Dangerfield, Ablett, Selwood and Rocky. Don't have Libba.
Torn between Rocky to Gray or Libba?
It's either miss out on Libba all together, save trades and secure the better premium mids now, or save cash, enjoy the price rises and sort out mids later.
Quote from: jfitty on April 06, 2016, 11:23:35 AM
Looking at a POD for Rockliff:
Tom Mitchell vs Cal Ward vs Mark Blicavs
Mitchell is possibly my first choice, reckon this will be the year he puts it together and could average 110-115. Will always fly under the radar with Parker, Hannebery and Kennedy around.
Had Ward the last 2 seasons and know what to expect. Does throw in quite a few 80-90 scores but makes it up with some 140+ ones.
Blicavs I've added only because I could eventually swing him into the rucks (have Goldy and a mid pricer)
Treloar? Was disappointing last week but is always in the guts now as pendles of HB and Swan out. Will only get better?
JJ vs Gibson. Haven't seen this one discussed anywhere. Gibbo has come out firing, but seems to be slipping under the radar. JJ, well we all know about him, but can he keep it up when the Dogs come up against decent opposition?
Quote from: Huttabito on April 07, 2016, 01:59:14 PM
5 Premo mids are Fyfe, Dangerfield, Ablett, Selwood and Rocky. Don't have Libba.
Torn between Rocky to Gray or Libba?
It's either miss out on Libba all together, save trades and secure the better premium mids now, or save cash, enjoy the price rises and sort out mids later.
libba! could end up being a keeper anyway!
Quote from: no eye deer on April 07, 2016, 03:15:08 PM
JJ vs Gibson. Haven't seen this one discussed anywhere. Gibbo has come out firing, but seems to be slipping under the radar. JJ, well we all know about him, but can he keep it up when the Dogs come up against decent opposition?
jj! just a gut feel really! cant go wrong with either really! both in the top 10 backs i reckon!
Rockliff to Aaron Hall or Robbie Gray?
Hall vs Bennedy + 250k
Quote from: jamesalex on April 07, 2016, 07:50:36 PM
Rockliff to Aaron Hall or Robbie Gray?
Gray!
Quote from: hawkboy80 on April 07, 2016, 07:57:57 PM
Hall vs Bennedy + 250k
Bennedy!
Hall+Smitchell v Merret+Titchell
Quote from: mzunguman on April 07, 2016, 10:27:59 PM
Quote from: jamesalex on April 07, 2016, 07:50:36 PM
Rockliff to Aaron Hall or Robbie Gray?
Gray!
Gotta disagree here. Hall a certainty to be top 6 forward. Gray not certain for mids (although probable) and not going to rise in price as much so you can always get him later. Good VC option for this week but that can't be the only reason you trade him in!
Quote from: LaHug on April 07, 2016, 10:30:57 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on April 07, 2016, 10:27:59 PM
Quote from: jamesalex on April 07, 2016, 07:50:36 PM
Rockliff to Aaron Hall or Robbie Gray?
Gray!
Gotta disagree here. Hall a certainty to be top 6 forward. Gray not certain for mids (although probable) and not going to rise in price as much so you can always get him later. Good VC option for this week but that can't be the only reason you trade him in!
I think overall point output Gray will deliver more. With some big ins still to come for gc along with a tough schedule I think you'll find halls point dip. Whereas I think gray will continue to pump out decent scores. He still scored big in a heavy loss going at around 50% DE!
Quote from: mzunguman on April 07, 2016, 10:40:03 PM
Quote from: LaHug on April 07, 2016, 10:30:57 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on April 07, 2016, 10:27:59 PM
Quote from: jamesalex on April 07, 2016, 07:50:36 PM
Rockliff to Aaron Hall or Robbie Gray?
Gray!
Gotta disagree here. Hall a certainty to be top 6 forward. Gray not certain for mids (although probable) and not going to rise in price as much so you can always get him later. Good VC option for this week but that can't be the only reason you trade him in!
I think overall point output Gray will deliver more. With some big ins still to come for gc along with a tough schedule I think you'll find halls point dip. Whereas I think gray will continue to pump out decent scores. He still scored big in a heavy loss going at around 50% DE!
I agree he'll score more overall but he's mid only and Hall has a low BE, making it now or never for him.
field menadue or oliver? going oliver at this stage
got gresham and simpkin and cant loophole either #rigged
Quote from: YoungGun on April 07, 2016, 11:00:20 PM
field menadue or oliver? going oliver at this stage
got gresham and simpkin and cant loophole either #rigged
yeah i'd take the big red over menadue mate.
Blicavs vs Sam Mitchell (in the mids)
Papley v Kennedy
can only fit in one of them now who is the more important to have?
Gibson vs JJ vs Suggestions
493k in the bank
Quote from: Bubbles on April 08, 2016, 12:09:37 PM
Papley v Kennedy
can only fit in one of them now who is the more important to have?
Kennedy
Quote from: Bubbles on April 08, 2016, 12:09:37 PM
Papley v Kennedy
can only fit in one of them now who is the more important to have?
I've gone bennedy, I think better js & will score more, I expect papley to drop away
Trade gresham or petrecca out to bring papley in?
Parish and Parker or Hewett and a mid under 625k (Priddis, Tom mitchell, Ward, Gray etc)
Which one do I hold onto, and which one do i trade for JJ?
A) Crouch
B) Barlow
Quote from: nathanjp24 on April 08, 2016, 02:52:45 PM
Trade gresham or petrecca out to bring papley in?
Gresham
Quote from: Rossiii on April 08, 2016, 03:52:35 PM
Quote from: Rossiii on April 08, 2016, 12:34:15 PM
Gibson vs JJ vs Suggestions
493k in the bank
??
I like Gibson... JJ away from etihad is not that great
Rocky to Danger?
or go Rocky --> JJ (assuming we think he finishes in top 6-8 DEF) and pocket the $$$
Rocky to parker or hall
Rocky and Crouch too Libba and Hall or Danger and Papley + 25k
Depending on how I'm going in my main H2H games this week, would it be worth going Rocky to Jelwood or Zorko? And if so, which one? Currently have Mills emg FWIW, so have 56 points there atm.
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 12:35:34 PM
Depending on how I'm going in my main H2H games this week, would it be worth going Rocky to Jelwood or Zorko? And if so, which one? Currently have Mills emg FWIW, so have 56 points there atm.
I'd go Zorko over Selwood, because he'll be a top 10 forward for sure. Not so sure Selwood can be a top 10 mid.
Quote from: Jay on April 10, 2016, 05:22:00 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 12:35:34 PM
Depending on how I'm going in my main H2H games this week, would it be worth going Rocky to Jelwood or Zorko? And if so, which one? Currently have Mills emg FWIW, so have 56 points there atm.
I'd go Zorko over Selwood, because he'll be a top 10 forward for sure. Not so sure Selwood can be a top 10 mid.
Yeah and had Zorko all pre-season before his suspension...
Currently up by 17 in main league, Robbo/Danger/Mills (or who i trade Rocky to) vs Gibson, Smitch, Jelwood
Go with Zorko?
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 05:29:30 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 10, 2016, 05:22:00 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 12:35:34 PM
Depending on how I'm going in my main H2H games this week, would it be worth going Rocky to Jelwood or Zorko? And if so, which one? Currently have Mills emg FWIW, so have 56 points there atm.
I'd go Zorko over Selwood, because he'll be a top 10 forward for sure. Not so sure Selwood can be a top 10 mid.
Yeah and had Zorko all pre-season before his suspension...
Currently up by 17 in main league, Robbo/Danger/Mills (or who i trade Rocky to) vs Gibson, Smitch, Jelwood
Go with Zorko?
I would. Rocky out 2 weeks and those kind of injuries can linger. Will drop in price when he comes back in too anyway.
Quote from: Jay on April 10, 2016, 05:36:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 05:29:30 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 10, 2016, 05:22:00 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 12:35:34 PM
Depending on how I'm going in my main H2H games this week, would it be worth going Rocky to Jelwood or Zorko? And if so, which one? Currently have Mills emg FWIW, so have 56 points there atm.
I'd go Zorko over Selwood, because he'll be a top 10 forward for sure. Not so sure Selwood can be a top 10 mid.
Yeah and had Zorko all pre-season before his suspension...
Currently up by 17 in main league, Robbo/Danger/Mills (or who i trade Rocky to) vs Gibson, Smitch, Jelwood
Go with Zorko?
I would. Rocky out 2 weeks and those kind of injuries can linger. Will drop in price when he comes back in too anyway.
Zorko is in :-X
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 06:01:24 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 10, 2016, 05:36:44 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 05:29:30 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 10, 2016, 05:22:00 PM
Quote from: GoLions on April 10, 2016, 12:35:34 PM
Depending on how I'm going in my main H2H games this week, would it be worth going Rocky to Jelwood or Zorko? And if so, which one? Currently have Mills emg FWIW, so have 56 points there atm.
I'd go Zorko over Selwood, because he'll be a top 10 forward for sure. Not so sure Selwood can be a top 10 mid.
Yeah and had Zorko all pre-season before his suspension...
Currently up by 17 in main league, Robbo/Danger/Mills (or who i trade Rocky to) vs Gibson, Smitch, Jelwood
Go with Zorko?
I would. Rocky out 2 weeks and those kind of injuries can linger. Will drop in price when he comes back in too anyway.
Zorko is in :-X
Good so far!
Blicavs vs Gawn
Wanting to ditch Leuenberger, and these 2 are right in my price range.
Could also get NicNat.. But really liking Blicavs as a point of difference. Feel he could be the most consistent with his permanent midfield role
Lonergan to Laird/houli OR De Goey to Zorko/Merret ??
Quote from: pendles93 on April 11, 2016, 12:51:14 AM
Lonergan to Laird/houli OR De Goey to Zorko/Merret ??
Houli and Zorko i'd say. I'm pretty much doing the same except lonergan to Houli and crouch to parker/gray or De goey to Zorko. Thing is De goey hasn't been bad in a terrible Collingwood side i'm holding him but don't have confidence in him
Quote from: brudski on April 11, 2016, 01:00:26 AM
Quote from: pendles93 on April 11, 2016, 12:51:14 AM
Lonergan to Laird/houli OR De Goey to Zorko/Merret ??
Houli and Zorko i'd say. I'm pretty much doing the same except lonergan to Houli and crouch to parker/gray or De goey to Zorko. Thing is De goey hasn't been bad in a terrible Collingwood side i'm holding him but don't have confidence in him
Yeah unfortunately I can only do one haha not sure whether I go lonergan or JDG up. Yeah you're right DG has been doing well but I see Zorko being a top 5 FWD and want to jump on before his price goes up.
Need to ditch spud Harwood.
Is it too late for Weitering or should I go rookie?
Weitering vs Hartley vs Ruggles/Byrne-Jones (next week)
Dalhaus vs Dusty vs Montagna?
Houli vs Rance vs Laird?
:)
Quote from: Maca24 on April 11, 2016, 07:35:31 PM
Dalhaus vs Dusty vs Montagna?
Houli vs Rance vs Laird?
:)
Quote from: Rusty00 on April 11, 2016, 12:52:49 PM
Need to ditch spud Harwood.
Is it too late for Weitering or should I go rookie?
Weitering vs Hartley vs Ruggles/Byrne-Jones (next week)
I'm in the same boat, I'm thinking ruggles will be the best option
Quote from: Maca24 on April 11, 2016, 07:35:31 PM
Dalhaus vs Dusty vs Montagna?
Houli vs Rance vs Laird?
:)
I personally would go Joey Montagna in forwards.
defence is much closer, could make a case for either of the 3, but I would go Laird.
Quote from: bottlemart on April 12, 2016, 12:16:14 AM
Quote from: Maca24 on April 11, 2016, 07:35:31 PM
Dalhaus vs Dusty vs Montagna?
Houli vs Rance vs Laird?
:)
I personally would go Joey Montagna in forwards.
defence is much closer, could make a case for either of the 3, but I would go Laird.
My reasoning for selecting Dahl and Houli is their lowish BEs
Almost all keepers so get 'em while they're cheap
Quote from: Maca24 on April 11, 2016, 07:35:31 PM
Dalhaus vs Dusty vs Montagna?
Houli vs Rance vs Laird?
:)
There's a name I haven't seen in a while!
Dusty and Laird for me mate.
Buddy vs Zorko vs Hall vs Dahlhaus?
Quote from: My Chumps on April 12, 2016, 03:00:04 AM
Quote from: Maca24 on April 11, 2016, 07:35:31 PM
Dalhaus vs Dusty vs Montagna?
Houli vs Rance vs Laird?
:)
There's a name I haven't seen in a while!
Dusty and Laird for me mate.
Hey mate ;)
@Jay - Dalhaus or Hall IMO depending on your situation
Hartley vs Byrne vs Byrne-Jones
Need to bring one of them in this week..
Quote from: My Chumps on April 12, 2016, 03:00:04 AM
Quote from: Maca24 on April 11, 2016, 07:35:31 PM
Dalhaus vs Dusty vs Montagna?
Houli vs Rance vs Laird?
:)
There's a name I haven't seen in a while!
Dusty and Laird for me mate.
2nd this
Quote from: Maca24 on April 12, 2016, 02:15:43 PM
Quote from: My Chumps on April 12, 2016, 03:00:04 AM
Quote from: Maca24 on April 11, 2016, 07:35:31 PM
Dalhaus vs Dusty vs Montagna?
Houli vs Rance vs Laird?
:)
There's a name I haven't seen in a while!
Dusty and Laird for me mate.
Hey mate ;)
@Jay - Dalhaus or Hall IMO depending on your situation
Hartley vs Byrne vs Byrne-Jones
Need to bring one of them in this week..
Hartly has the best JS, the Port rookie will be out when injured players return you would think..
Honestly don't know much about the Irish lad at Carlton (looking into him myself vs Ruggles)
Upgrading an R2:
Gawn vs Blicavs vs Naitanui
Quote from: jfitty on April 12, 2016, 03:43:38 PM
Upgrading an R2:
Gawn vs Blicavs vs Naitanui
Gawn - proved he can be the best ruck in the comp on the weekend. Brilliant battle with Goldy.
Yeah you would think Gawn's confidence would be sky high about now, really interested to see
if he goes on a massive run...
Thanks guys! Was thinking of going with a POD, but perhaps Gawn would be best regardless.
I could wait a week and get Stef Martin next week..
Lonergan to any prem def (laird/houli?) or De Goey to any prem fwd (zorko).
have $ in the bank can do in one trade.
Quote from: pendles93 on April 12, 2016, 07:17:55 PM
Lonergan to any prem def (laird/houli?) or De Goey to any prem fwd (zorko).
have $ in the bank can do in one trade.
Houli would be my pick, he's been amazing!
Trade Roberton down to Fantasia or all the way down to Ruggles early?
Quote from: colmullet on April 12, 2016, 07:59:22 PM
Trade Roberton down to Fantasia or all the way down to Ruggles early?
Roberton @ 450k surely has enough value for a decent sideways? How much cash do you have available?
EDIT: Docherty for an extra 35k seems like a solid option.
Quote from: MC on April 12, 2016, 08:10:45 PM
Quote from: colmullet on April 12, 2016, 07:59:22 PM
Trade Roberton down to Fantasia or all the way down to Ruggles early?
Roberton @ 450k surely has enough value for a decent sideways? How much cash do you have available?
EDIT: Docherty for an extra 35k seems like a solid option.
I would love to but i need the cash to turn Crouch into a premo in the mids so i can get one of the mid rookies off the park
Parker vs R.Gray :o
Can only bring in one for Rocky...
Already have Hannaz, Danger, Ablett, Shiel, Libba, Rocky
Leaning to Gray as his DE has been low and will explode some 150+'s shortly.
Ports upcoming games = gws, cats, tigs, brisbane, carlton.
Quote from: petefisker on April 12, 2016, 09:58:10 PM
Parker vs R.Gray :o
Can only bring in one for Rocky...
Already have Hannaz, Danger, Ablett, Shiel, Libba, Rocky
Leaning to Gray as his DE has been low and will explode some 150+'s shortly.
Ports upcoming games = gws, cats, tigs, brisbane, carlton.
Isn't Rocky only one week off? You've already waited a week, may as well wait one more and save the trade.
fyfe or montags for crouch? montags will enable me to bring in shaw next week with a double trade but if i go fyfe i will fall short! these are the next 3 players i want in my side! thoughts!!!
Quote from: My Chumps on April 13, 2016, 12:58:25 AM
Quote from: petefisker on April 12, 2016, 09:58:10 PM
Parker vs R.Gray :o
Can only bring in one for Rocky...
Already have Hannaz, Danger, Ablett, Shiel, Libba, Rocky
Leaning to Gray as his DE has been low and will explode some 150+'s shortly.
Ports upcoming games = gws, cats, tigs, brisbane, carlton.
Isn't Rocky only one week off? You've already waited a week, may as well wait one more and save the trade.
I can see why one would consider dropping Rocky. If you've got doubts he'll be top 10 mid then now is a good time to jettison.
One option would be to grab a cheaper guy having a breakout year who is DPP and so could be used short term in the corridor of the mids and then moved to his rightful place down the hall to forwards.
A lot of people are want to lobby for one guy and make a give him a grand entrance to their team.
Food for thought.
S. Gray to Zorko vs Joey vs Mid premo
Might have been done but
Crouch for Selwood or Parker?
Cheers
Quote from: mark44 on April 13, 2016, 03:10:02 PM
Might have been done but
Crouch for Selwood or Parker?
Cheers
You still have time to get Selwood, Parker is heading to that out of reach price range!
Quote from: jvalles69 on April 13, 2016, 03:15:38 PM
Quote from: mark44 on April 13, 2016, 03:10:02 PM
Might have been done but
Crouch for Selwood or Parker?
Cheers
You still have time to get Selwood, Parker is heading to that out of reach price range!
Couldn't agree more!
Parker vs Zorko?
Quote from: BomberSam on April 13, 2016, 03:54:28 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on April 13, 2016, 03:15:38 PM
Quote from: mark44 on April 13, 2016, 03:10:02 PM
Might have been done but
Crouch for Selwood or Parker?
Cheers
You still have time to get Selwood, Parker is heading to that out of reach price range!
Couldn't agree more!
So what your saying is if you can afford Parker then get him ?
Quote from: mark44 on April 13, 2016, 04:07:25 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on April 13, 2016, 03:54:28 PM
Quote from: jvalles69 on April 13, 2016, 03:15:38 PM
Quote from: mark44 on April 13, 2016, 03:10:02 PM
Might have been done but
Crouch for Selwood or Parker?
Cheers
You still have time to get Selwood, Parker is heading to that out of reach price range!
Couldn't agree more!
So what your saying is if you can afford Parker then get him ?
Yes.
Crouch to Gray or Parker
Quote from: whynot102 on April 13, 2016, 06:26:42 PM
Crouch to Gray or Parker
I would still go with Robbie. Back to back 110 seasons and off to a great start this year. Parker has already had one huge price rise.
JPK vs Buddy. Who to trade in?
Quote from: Jay on April 13, 2016, 07:23:15 PM
JPK vs Buddy. Who to trade in?
Looking at both BE's Bud (75) JPK (120) it's a line ball really.. probs JPK for me for the POD.
Robbie Gray + 40k
Sam Mitchell + 50k
Joel Selwood + 90k
Dayne Zorko + 105k
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 14, 2016, 07:00:01 PM
Robbie Gray + 40k
Sam Mitchell + 50k
Joel Selwood + 90k
Dayne Zorko + 105k
Gray is the one I'm very keen on, Port have a lovely draw from here. Nothing wrong with the others but Gray looks to be in sublime form.
Quote from: Bully on April 14, 2016, 07:05:59 PM
Gray is the one I'm very keen on, Port have a lovely draw from here. Nothing wrong with the others but Gray looks to be in sublime form.
I agree mate. Am keen on him too. Just the extra cash will let me go Rampe > Laird/Docherty etc, whereas if i go with Gray, the best option will probs be BSmith. But for the moment, I am settled with Gray.
Hall V Zorko
Quote from: Fid on April 14, 2016, 07:11:54 PM
Hall V Zorko
Zorko. Only had 24 and 25 touches for a 130 ave. Thoughts on mine?
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 14, 2016, 07:09:37 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 14, 2016, 07:05:59 PM
Gray is the one I'm very keen on, Port have a lovely draw from here. Nothing wrong with the others but Gray looks to be in sublime form.
I agree mate. Am keen on him too. Just the extra cash will let me go Rampe > Laird/Docherty etc, whereas if i go with Gray, the best option will probs be BSmith. But for the moment, I am settled with Gray.
Selwood and Laird I'd go if that's the case then mate.
Quote from: My Chumps on April 14, 2016, 08:40:31 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 14, 2016, 07:09:37 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 14, 2016, 07:05:59 PM
Gray is the one I'm very keen on, Port have a lovely draw from here. Nothing wrong with the others but Gray looks to be in sublime form.
I agree mate. Am keen on him too. Just the extra cash will let me go Rampe > Laird/Docherty etc, whereas if i go with Gray, the best option will probs be BSmith. But for the moment, I am settled with Gray.
Selwood and Laird I'd go if that's the case then mate.
That's a decent combo, have just analysed Selwood's draw and he's coming up up against some opponents he regularly dominates.
Really can't decide on
Ruggles or Hartley ?
Quote from: Bully on April 14, 2016, 08:46:02 PM
Quote from: My Chumps on April 14, 2016, 08:40:31 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 14, 2016, 07:09:37 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 14, 2016, 07:05:59 PM
Gray is the one I'm very keen on, Port have a lovely draw from here. Nothing wrong with the others but Gray looks to be in sublime form.
I agree mate. Am keen on him too. Just the extra cash will let me go Rampe > Laird/Docherty etc, whereas if i go with Gray, the best option will probs be BSmith. But for the moment, I am settled with Gray.
Selwood and Laird I'd go if that's the case then mate.
That's a decent combo, have just analysed Selwood's draw and he's coming up up against some opponents he regularly dominates.
Laird would be out of reach, just.
I think the options would be:
Robbie gray and Brodie Smith
Selwood and Docherty (490-500k)
or Zorko and Laird
Quote from: mark44 on April 14, 2016, 08:54:54 PM
Really can't decide on
Ruggles or Hartley ?
Rug for me here.
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 14, 2016, 08:58:26 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 14, 2016, 08:46:02 PM
Quote from: My Chumps on April 14, 2016, 08:40:31 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 14, 2016, 07:09:37 PM
Quote from: Bully on April 14, 2016, 07:05:59 PM
Gray is the one I'm very keen on, Port have a lovely draw from here. Nothing wrong with the others but Gray looks to be in sublime form.
I agree mate. Am keen on him too. Just the extra cash will let me go Rampe > Laird/Docherty etc, whereas if i go with Gray, the best option will probs be BSmith. But for the moment, I am settled with Gray.
Selwood and Laird I'd go if that's the case then mate.
That's a decent combo, have just analysed Selwood's draw and he's coming up up against some opponents he regularly dominates.
Laird would be out of reach, just.
I think the options would be:
Robbie gray and Brodie Smith
Selwood and Docherty (490-500k)
or Zorko and Laird
Gray and Smith represents the best value, although all of those options have credibility. But just going back to Selwood, these are his next few opponents and these are his recent scores.
vs Ess (122, 138)
vs GC (154, 103)
vs Port (82, 89)
vs WC (79, 126)
vs Adel (142, 157)
Anything close to those averages will see him edge over the 600k mark. I still think Gray is the one but Selwood is hard to ignore at his price.
mitch mcgovern vs callum ah chee
Quote from: jeesh on April 14, 2016, 09:42:22 PM
mitch mcgovern vs callum ah chee
Ah Chee. He has the better JS I think.
tippa v papley
Stef Martin vs Blicavs?
Quote from: Gandalf123 on April 14, 2016, 10:06:59 PM
tippa v papley
Tippa a safer bet imo. Smear for ceiling.
Quote from: jfitty on April 14, 2016, 10:57:53 PM
Stef Martin vs Blicavs?
Stef with the runs on the board.
Darcy Parish v Aaron Young ?
Quote from: MontyJnr on April 14, 2016, 11:36:36 PM
Darcy Parish v Aaron Young ?
Parish, Wingard's return should restrict Young
Quote from: Gandalf123 on April 14, 2016, 10:06:59 PM
tippa v papley
Probably leaning towards Tippa just.
Quote from: jfitty on April 14, 2016, 10:57:53 PM
Stef Martin vs Blicavs?
Big Stef.
Quote from: MontyJnr on April 14, 2016, 11:36:36 PMDarcy Parish v Aaron Young ?
Parish by a mile. Don't know what Young's JS is like, and either way he won't be kicking 3 and 4 goals each week.
Parker vs Zorko vs Gray vs Priddis
Parker vs Selwood
Considering I already have banners and Sydney midfield will steal points
Cheers
Quote from: mark44 on April 15, 2016, 11:00:39 AM
Parker vs Selwood
Considering I already have banners and Sydney midfield will steal points
Cheers
I'd go Jelwood
Quote from: nathanjp24 on April 15, 2016, 10:16:11 AM
Parker vs Zorko vs Gray vs Priddis
Parker.
Quote from: mark44 on April 15, 2016, 11:00:39 AM
Parker vs Selwood
Considering I already have banners and Sydney midfield will steal points
Cheers
Still Parker!
50 50 , hard choice
So 50/50, Parker just, feel Selwood is more likely to miss more games
Good morning gentlemen and GoLions,
I am reaching out to those of you with a low opinion of your SC knowledge.
If you decide to post a query that you expect to be answered immediately below a query that someone expects to be answered, why not take the effort to share your opinion before derailing the thread?
We value your opinion and you. :-*
Quote from: tor01doc on April 15, 2016, 11:56:06 AM
Good morning gentlemen and GoLions,
I am reaching out to those of you with a low opinion of your SC knowledge.
If you decide to post a query that you expect to be answered immediately below a query that someone expects to be answered, why not take the effort to share your opinion before derailing the thread?
We value your opinion and you. :-*
second this ^
Quote from: Samm79 on April 15, 2016, 12:26:53 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on April 15, 2016, 11:56:06 AM
Good morning gentlemen and GoLions,
I am reaching out to those of you with a low opinion of your SC knowledge.
If you decide to post a query that you expect to be answered immediately below a query that someone expects to be answered, why not take the effort to share your opinion before derailing the thread?
We value your opinion and you. :-*
second this ^
Fair enough
Quote from: tor01doc on April 15, 2016, 11:56:06 AM
Good morning gentlemen and GoLions,
I am reaching out to those of you with a low opinion of your SC knowledge.
If you decide to post a query that you expect to be answered immediately below a query that someone expects to be answered, why not take the effort to share your opinion before derailing the thread?
We value your opinion and you. :-*
OI :P
This is a good point - if you can avoid posting your X v Y till after the previous one has had at least one reply it would be appreciated.
Scrolling through the thread as i can I have found some 4 requests still not answered due to another being requested and then getting lost.
Do not want to go down the path of deleting requests but if you can not observe the simple courtesy of waiting for at least one reply on the previous I may take that action. There is also no reason why you can not comment and then post your own.
As mods we are also merging some new topics into this thread so hence the need for courtesy/
Im trading out Crouch
Parish v Wright v keep Crouch (field papley)
The three of these players are all predicted to peak at around the $400k mark. So looking at the three
Parish has $140K to make based on maintaining and average of 83.
Wright is predicted to only make $49k based on previous averages against teams
Crouch is only predicted to rise $76k based on previous averages against teams.
A couple of notes to consider Both Wright and Crouch obviously are improving on last year so these averages may improve resulting in higher cash gains and will Parish maintain an 83 average.
So my choice would be to stay with Crouch as he has the runs on the board. Maybe with this break he can come back and average 102 as he did last year when he came back.
Quote from: Ringo on April 15, 2016, 02:54:45 PM
The three of these players are all predicted to peak at around the $400k mark. So looking at the three
Parish has $140K to make based on maintaining and average of 83.
Wright is predicted to only make $49k based on previous averages against teams
Crouch is only predicted to rise $76k based on previous averages against teams.
A couple of notes to consider Both Wright and Crouch obviously are improving on last year so these averages may improve resulting in higher cash gains and will Parish maintain an 83 average.
So my choice would be to stay with Crouch as he has the runs on the board. Maybe with this break he can come back and average 102 as he did last year when he came back.
thanks mate, Im just not sure about having 4 players not making any money at this time of year (Hewett, Crouch, Grimley and Petrecca)
Quote from: Samsturmfels on April 15, 2016, 02:58:52 PM
Quote from: Ringo on April 15, 2016, 02:54:45 PM
The three of these players are all predicted to peak at around the $400k mark. So looking at the three
Parish has $140K to make based on maintaining and average of 83.
Wright is predicted to only make $49k based on previous averages against teams
Crouch is only predicted to rise $76k based on previous averages against teams.
A couple of notes to consider Both Wright and Crouch obviously are improving on last year so these averages may improve resulting in higher cash gains and will Parish maintain an 83 average.
So my choice would be to stay with Crouch as he has the runs on the board. Maybe with this break he can come back and average 102 as he did last year when he came back.
thanks mate, Im just not sure about having 4 players not making any money at this time of year (Hewett, Crouch, Grimley and Petrecca)
In that case go with gut as to what is best for your team - Yep 4 non earning may be a bit much at this time. You do not have the option of trading hewett via DPP do you?
Hey guys,
If you were to try to fix one of the following problems, which would you prioritise and why?
1. Greene
2. Barlow
3. Yeo
4. Lonergan
5. JPK/Pendles (minor in comparison, still annoying)
Lonergan as the bloke with the least runs on the board is what i'm leaning towards, unsure whether to pull the trigger this week or to wait though...
What do you reckon?
Quote from: MC on April 15, 2016, 03:03:18 PM
Hey guys,
If you were to try to fix one of the following problems, which would you prioritise and why?
1. Greene
2. Barlow
3. Yeo
4. Lonergan
5. JPK/Pendles (minor in comparison, still annoying)
Lonergan as the bloke with the least runs on the board is what i'm leaning towards, unsure whether to pull the trigger this week or to wait though...
What do you reckon?
Greene is a nightmare this year, I would be trading him for sure.
In this order
Greene
Barlow
Lonergan
Yeo
JPK/Pendles
Greene is having a shocking year and doubt if he can it around Hope I am wrong though.
Quote from: MC on April 15, 2016, 03:03:18 PM
Hey guys,
If you were to try to fix one of the following problems, which would you prioritise and why?
1. Greene
2. Barlow
3. Yeo
4. Lonergan
5. JPK/Pendles (minor in comparison, still annoying)
Lonergan as the bloke with the least runs on the board is what i'm leaning towards, unsure whether to pull the trigger this week or to wait though...
What do you reckon?
1. Greene
2. Lonergan
3. Yeo
4. Barlow
5. JPK
6. Pendles
Quote from: MC on April 15, 2016, 03:03:18 PM
Hey guys,
If you were to try to fix one of the following problems, which would you prioritise and why?
1. Greene
2. Barlow
3. Yeo
4. Lonergan
5. JPK/Pendles (minor in comparison, still annoying)
Lonergan as the bloke with the least runs on the board is what i'm leaning towards, unsure whether to pull the trigger this week or to wait though...
What do you reckon?
In this order of what I'd fix first:
1. Greene
2. Lonergan
3. Barlow
4. Yeo
JPK/Pendles isn't a problem at all mate. Hold them the whole year, they'll come good - proven guns.
JPK vs Sidebottom vs Sloane vs Treloar
Quote from: Jay on April 15, 2016, 05:36:31 PM
JPK vs Sidebottom vs Sloane vs Treloar
I personally like Treloar out of those options but I don't think you can go wrong with any really.
R.Gray v Smitchell
and
Kennedy v Oliver v Parish
thanks guys.
Quote from: Money Shot on April 15, 2016, 05:57:27 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 15, 2016, 05:36:31 PM
JPK vs Sidebottom vs Sloane vs Treloar
I personally like Treloar out of those options but I don't think you can go wrong with any really.
R.Gray v Smitchell (snitch may get a rest)
and
Kennedy (senior body+player who won't get tired at seasons end v Oliver v Parish
thanks guys.
My 2 cents MS
Quote from: Money Shot on April 15, 2016, 05:57:27 PM
Quote from: Jay on April 15, 2016, 05:36:31 PM
JPK vs Sidebottom vs Sloane vs Treloar
I personally like Treloar out of those options but I don't think you can go wrong with any really.
R.Gray v Smitchell
and
Kennedy v Oliver v Parish
thanks guys.
Cheers mate. I'm really struggling to separate them.
As for your situation, I'd go Gray and Parish
Cheers for all of the responses guys, seems like Greene is a resounding victor then.
Quote from: Jay on April 15, 2016, 05:36:31 PM
JPK vs Sidebottom vs Sloane vs Treloar
JPK > Treloar > Sloane > Sidey
Quote from: Money Shot on April 15, 2016, 05:57:27 PM
R.Gray v Smitchell
and
Kennedy v Oliver v Parish
thanks guys.
Gray and Parish imo
Looks like Gray and Parish it is.
Was thinking Parish purely because of his breakeven.
I think Gray is my choice out of the second two as well.
Quote from: Ringo on April 15, 2016, 02:36:50 PM
This is a good point - if you can avoid posting your X v Y till after the previous one has had at least one reply it would be appreciated.
Scrolling through the thread as i can I have found some 4 requests still not answered due to another being requested and then getting lost.
Do not want to go down the path of deleting requests but if you can not observe the simple courtesy of waiting for at least one reply on the previous I may take that action. There is also no reason why you can not comment and then post your own.
As mods we are also merging some new topics into this thread so hence the need for courtesy/
In many respects I hate this X vs Y thread. We didn't use to have it.
The reasons I don't like it are: you can post and it gets lost for the reasons stated above (this has happened to me), if you get a reply it is often just the one... and one and you're left wanting more.
As for merging threads that can be annoying too, particularly if you are running a poll.
Polls were once one of my favourite features of fan footy but for some reason they all disappear and get lost in a merged thread where you don't get all feedback that is specific to your wants.
My 2 cents. Perhaps it's not the forum....feel free to delete it or put in in another thread. :P
Probably need to trade Big Stef.
Nic Nat vs. Gawn?
Laird v Rance
Already have Shaw and Houli
Quote from: Bubbles on April 18, 2016, 10:52:57 AM
Laird v Rance
Already have Shaw and Houli
Go Laird. Number one defender this year.
Quote from: BomberSam on April 18, 2016, 10:58:50 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on April 18, 2016, 10:52:57 AM
Laird v Rance
Already have Shaw and Houli
Go Laird. Number one defender this year.
Laird for me too, Consistently will hit 100's.. Rance will throw in the odd stinker
im tossing up between Ward vs Zorko
Quote from: Elcapitano on April 18, 2016, 11:01:48 AM
Quote from: BomberSam on April 18, 2016, 10:58:50 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on April 18, 2016, 10:52:57 AM
Laird v Rance
Already have Shaw and Houli
Go Laird. Number one defender this year.
Laird for me too, Consistently will hit 100's.. Rance will throw in the odd stinker
im tossing up between Ward vs Zorko
Ward is looking majestic.
Ward in the Mids or Dalhaus in the FWDs?
Quote from: BomberSam on April 18, 2016, 10:39:24 AM
Probably need to trade Big Stef.
Nic Nat vs. Gawn?
I went to Goldy as had Gawn. If you have Goldy would go Gawn. Motivated, young strong and getting better.
zerrett vs zaka.
replacing sam gray.
if stef plays i want to get rid of 2 of these 3 donkeys! sheridan,lonergan and seedsman! leaning towards sheridan and lonergan as they are worth more and a higher BE thoughts?
Merrett in the fwds or Parker in the mids
byrne vs ruggles?
Quote from: ants on April 19, 2016, 10:48:33 AM
byrne vs ruggles?
Ruggles, but Byrne-Jones if you don't already have him.
Pendlebury vs Dalhaus vs Dusty
Not sure if its the best time to jump on pendles so if not, I'll add a forward premo instead.
Any help appreciated :)
Quote from: Maca24 on April 19, 2016, 12:03:21 PM
Quote from: ants on April 19, 2016, 10:48:33 AM
byrne vs ruggles?
Ruggles, but Byrne-Jones if you don't already have him.
Pendlebury vs Dalhaus vs Dusty
Not sure if its the best time to jump on pendles so if not, I'll add a forward premo instead.
Any help appreciated :)
So for the first part, are you saying Byrne-Jones ahead of Ruggles?
For the secone, Pendles IMO but it depends on who else you have. Forward top 6 - 8 will include both thise guys so maybe one of them and that's that sorted for the year.
Mids are more volatile.
Quote from: tor01doc on April 19, 2016, 12:06:50 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on April 19, 2016, 12:03:21 PM
Quote from: ants on April 19, 2016, 10:48:33 AM
byrne vs ruggles?
Ruggles, but Byrne-Jones if you don't already have him.
Pendlebury vs Dalhaus vs Dusty
Not sure if its the best time to jump on pendles so if not, I'll add a forward premo instead.
Any help appreciated :)
So for the first part, are you saying Byrne-Jones ahead of Ruggles?
For the secone, Pendles IMO but it depends on who else you have. Forward top 6 - 8 will include both thise guys so maybe one of them and that's that sorted for the year.
Mids are more volatile.
Sorry should have made myself more clear.
D.Byrne-Jones > Ruggles > C.Byrne
Yeah thinking maybe a forward keeper just to set and forget.
Guess I can wait another week on Pendles as he doesn't look like increasing in price.
buddy vs zerrett
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 19, 2016, 05:32:16 PM
buddy vs zerrett
I'd go Buddy, seems like he's due for some massive games.
Quote from: Southstorm on April 19, 2016, 06:59:16 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 19, 2016, 05:32:16 PM
buddy vs zerrett
I'd go Buddy, seems like he's due for some massive games.
to be contrarian I would always take mid/fwd over a kpp. Zerret is on track to be 2nd best SC at Essendon going forward after heppell.
Sloane vs Merrett
Quote from: crowls on April 19, 2016, 08:51:02 PM
Quote from: Southstorm on April 19, 2016, 06:59:16 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 19, 2016, 05:32:16 PM
buddy vs zerrett
I'd go Buddy, seems like he's due for some massive games.
to be contrarian I would always take mid/fwd over a kpp. Zerret is on track to be 2nd best SC at Essendon going forward after heppell.
I don't think Buddy falls into the general category of a KPF though, whereas someone like Waite would
Would take Buddy over Zerrett
Quote from: Bully on April 19, 2016, 09:03:04 PM
Sloane vs Merrett
I would go Zerrett. The Bombers have no pressure or expectations to win games. Zerrett will be top 2 SC avg for Bombers, won't get tagged. Zaha and Goddard ahead of him.
Luke Parker vs Callan Ward
Quote from: Marcon on April 20, 2016, 02:23:47 PM
Luke Parker vs Callan Ward
Buddy/Zaha + 16k
vs
Hannebery/DBJ + 276k
Ward vs s.mitch vs hanners. Trading out Lonergan
Quote from: Maca24 on April 19, 2016, 12:03:21 PM
Quote from: ants on April 19, 2016, 10:48:33 AM
byrne vs ruggles?
Ruggles, but Byrne-Jones if you don't already have him.
Pendlebury vs Dalhaus vs Dusty
Not sure if its the best time to jump on pendles so if not, I'll add a forward premo instead.
Any help appreciated :)
any consideration fo J Wagner (Dees)
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 19, 2016, 05:32:16 PM
buddy vs zerrett
Merrett.
Quote from: Bully on April 19, 2016, 09:03:04 PM
Sloane vs Merrett
Merrett much more likely to be a top 6 forward than Sloane to be a top 8 mid. Don't think much will separate them regardless. I'd go Merrett.
Quote from: Marcon on April 20, 2016, 02:23:47 PM
Luke Parker vs Callan Ward
Parker.
Quote from: Huttabito on April 20, 2016, 02:32:26 PM
Quote from: Marcon on April 20, 2016, 02:23:47 PM
Luke Parker vs Callan Ward
Buddy/Zaha + 16k
vs
Hannebery/DBJ + 276k
Buddy and Zaka.
Quote from: ryanbob0357 on April 20, 2016, 03:02:25 PM
Ward vs s.mitch vs hanners. Trading out Lonergan
Hanners I reckon.
Quote from: mzunguman on April 20, 2016, 03:49:41 PM
Quote from: Marcon on April 20, 2016, 02:23:47 PM
Luke Parker vs Callan Ward
I like Ward!!!
I really like Ward too. I responded with Parker simply because I think he will average more. Both great choices.
Quote from: Marcon on April 20, 2016, 02:23:47 PM
Luke Parker vs Callan Ward
Good options would take Ward as greater POD
Merrett vs Dahl vs Zorko
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 20, 2016, 05:27:23 PM
Merrett vs Dahl vs Zorko
Bump. Also looking for a premo forward.
Quote from: BomberSam on April 20, 2016, 03:50:33 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on April 20, 2016, 03:49:41 PM
Quote from: Marcon on April 20, 2016, 02:23:47 PM
Luke Parker vs Callan Ward
I like Ward!!!
I really like Ward too. I responded with Parker simply because I think he will average more. Both great choices.
Such a 50/50 call. Parker's bye may just edge it for me.
Quote from: Marcon on April 20, 2016, 06:35:55 PM
Quote from: BomberSam on April 20, 2016, 03:50:33 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on April 20, 2016, 03:49:41 PM
Quote from: Marcon on April 20, 2016, 02:23:47 PM
Luke Parker vs Callan Ward
I like Ward!!!
I really like Ward too. I responded with Parker simply because I think he will average more. Both great choices.
Such a 50/50 call. Parker's bye may just edge it for me.
I reckon they will average pretty similar come years end!
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 20, 2016, 05:39:51 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 20, 2016, 05:27:23 PM
Merrett vs Dahl vs Zorko
Bump. Also looking for a premo forward.
I reckon they will all be pretty similar come seasons end, but Zorko for me.
Quote from: MC on April 20, 2016, 06:31:12 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 20, 2016, 05:39:51 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 20, 2016, 05:27:23 PM
Merrett vs Dahl vs Zorko
Bump. Also looking for a premo forward.
Dahl > Zorko > Merrett
Quote from: Gandalf123 on April 20, 2016, 08:03:14 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on April 20, 2016, 05:39:51 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on April 20, 2016, 05:27:23 PM
Merrett vs Dahl vs Zorko
Bump. Also looking for a premo forward.
I reckon they will all be pretty similar come seasons end, but Zorko for me.
Well I had Merrett in, then Dahl and now Zorko. Haha, I too think they will be close at season's end.
Quote from: ryanbob0357 on April 20, 2016, 03:02:25 PM
Ward vs s.mitch vs hanners. Trading out Lonergan
I rate Hanners > Ward > Smitch (will be rested)
Quote from: ivolve on April 20, 2016, 11:56:02 PM
Quote from: ryanbob0357 on April 20, 2016, 03:02:25 PM
Ward vs s.mitch vs hanners. Trading out Lonergan
I rate Hanners > Ward > Smitch (will be rested)
ward>smitch>hanners for me! hanners let me down late last year when i got him in before finals so a bit disgruntled!
Zorko is a solid 100 ave but Rocky and Beams are coming back soon so don't expect Zorks to
punch out 115-140 every week lol.
Papley vs Menadue to trade out? Think Papley might have a few more decent scores in him, but any more 20s would hurt!
Quote from: no eye deer on April 21, 2016, 07:44:13 AM
Papley vs Menadue to trade out? Think Papley might have a few more decent scores in him, but any more 20s would hurt!
papley the one to go! lonergan or sheridan to trade out?
Quote from: ants on April 21, 2016, 08:28:35 AM
Quote from: no eye deer on April 21, 2016, 07:44:13 AM
Papley vs Menadue to trade out? Think Papley might have a few more decent scores in him, but any more 20s would hurt!
papley the one to go! lonergan or sheridan to trade out?
get rid of both! but lonergan first IMO
Z.Merrett v Ward??
Menadue or Byrne Jones?
paps vs milera to trade out. DBJ in
Paps still named so hes staying for me!!
Quote from: mzunguman on April 21, 2016, 09:12:24 PM
Paps still named so hes staying for me!!
Same here. Dunkley > Byrne Jones and JJ > Zerrett for me
Ward and Byrne-Jones
Or
Hannebery and Ruggles
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 22, 2016, 03:19:34 AM
Ward and Byrne-Jones
Or
Hannebery and Ruggles
ward / jones
wagner ruggles or byrne already taking dbj
Quote from: ants on April 22, 2016, 09:46:17 AM
wagner ruggles or byrne already taking dbj
ruggles or byrne. toss a coin lol. byrne better JS perhaps. ruggles cheaper.
Papley vs Oliver ?
Quote from: Sicko on April 22, 2016, 01:29:34 PM
Papley vs Oliver ?
Papley playing so gotta pick him over Oliver
Ward or Parker??
Quote from: mzunguman on April 22, 2016, 02:40:24 PM
Ward or Parker??
Tough. Ward more consistent?
M Brown for Byrne/Jones
Johannisen for Gibson/Houli?
Thinking Gibson. Gibson has a break even of 33, Houli 122 so will try and get him in later. Anyone else? Biggs maybe? Looking for set and forget.
Quote from: russty on April 22, 2016, 02:53:45 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on April 22, 2016, 02:40:24 PM
Ward or Parker??
Tough. Ward more consistent?
M Brown for Byrne/Jones
Johannisen for Gibson/Houli?
Thinking Gibson. Gibson has a break even of 33, Houli 122 so will try and get him in later. Anyone else? Biggs maybe? Looking for set and forget.
I feel like they will be pretty even... Though ward susceptible to a tag? Didn't cope well with it last year as seen in his sub 90 scores????
Definetly Gibbo!
Zaha, Jelwood, Sloane, Treloar or Sidearse
Looking to trade JJ.
Pendles vs Hanners?
Hanners for me
So is it worth taking Hannebery over Ward even though I'd have to pick Ruggles instead of Byrne-Jones for the bench? :-\
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 22, 2016, 08:52:42 PM
So is it worth taking Hannebery over Ward even though I'd have to pick Ruggles instead of Byrne-Jones for the bench? :-\
The season is a marathon not a sprint. Short term pain for long term gain! I'd go Hanners.
Hannebery and Dalhaus
Vs
Pendlebury and Montagna
This is deciding my next trades..
Quote from: Maca24 on April 22, 2016, 11:53:18 PM
Hannebery and Dalhaus
Vs
Pendlebury and Montagna
This is deciding my next trades..
I'd go with Hanners and Dollhouse but can't go wrong with either option.
Quote from: Maca24 on April 22, 2016, 11:53:18 PM
Hannebery and Dalhaus
Vs
Pendlebury and Montagna
This is deciding my next trades..
Pendles and Joey!
Who to trade out of menadue and papley?
Quote from: blackrose on April 23, 2016, 12:06:08 PM
Who to trade out of menadue and papley?
Trade the Smear.
Quote from: tommy10 on April 22, 2016, 04:23:38 PM
Zaha, Jelwood, Sloane, Treloar or Sidearse
Looking to trade JJ.
Zaha and Jelwood
Sloan getting plenty of ball and playing well but not converting it to a sc score. Treloar and Sidearse???
Jelwood still improving after little preseason and likely to avg 115+ for rest of season.
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 22, 2016, 08:52:42 PM
So is it worth taking Hannebery over Ward even though I'd have to pick Ruggles instead of Byrne-Jones for the bench? :-\
Yes
Quote from: Maca24 on April 22, 2016, 11:53:18 PM
Hannebery and Dalhaus
Vs
Pendlebury and Montagna
This is deciding my next trades..
Hannebery and Dalhaus - the other two are possibly going to get managed/rested at some point
Quote from: dgeams on April 24, 2016, 12:01:26 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 22, 2016, 08:52:42 PM
So is it worth taking Hannebery over Ward even though I'd have to pick Ruggles instead of Byrne-Jones for the bench? :-\
Yes
Hah! Now you say it. ::)
After Round 5...
Dan Hannebery vs Joel Selwood?
Quote from: MontyJnr on April 25, 2016, 10:54:09 PM
After Round 5...
Dan Hannebery vs Joel Selwood?
Selwood. Cheaper for the same output.
Selwood vs Cotchin?
Quote from: Thewizz71 on April 25, 2016, 11:56:24 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on April 25, 2016, 10:54:09 PM
After Round 5...
Dan Hannebery vs Joel Selwood?
Selwood. Cheaper for the same output.
Selwood vs Cotchin?
Selwood everyday of the week!
My one is -
Hannebery vs Parker vs Selwood vs Pendles.
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 25, 2016, 11:59:13 PM
My one is -
Hannebery vs Parker vs Selwood vs Pendles.
Got Parker and Pendles, so Selwood.
To replace Fyfe-
Ward v Sidebottom
Quote from: monga77 on April 26, 2016, 12:08:52 AM
To replace Fyfe-
Ward v Sidebottom
If you have Pendles, Ward.
If you don't have Pendles, Pendles.
Otherwise check your bye weighting as it will make a difference if you can't decide between 2 players.
B.Smith vs Biggs vs Bartel vs Savage
For D5/6
Quote from: dmac07 on April 26, 2016, 12:21:43 AM
B.Smith vs Biggs vs Bartel vs Savage
For D5/6
Smith.
lee this week or tucker next week?
Pendlebury Vs Priddis
Quote from: Padawan on April 26, 2016, 04:01:54 PM
Pendlebury Vs Priddis
Pendles. Priddis still has a high breakeven and i'd like another chance to see if he has fully recovered from that groin injury that kept him out a few weeks back.
Pendles v Selwood
Hanners vs Parker?
Is there really that much difference between them? :-\
ward vs selwood
who will make least cash from now
weits vs dea vs bken vs menadue vs oliver
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 26, 2016, 06:49:06 PM
Hanners vs Parker?
Is there really that much difference between them? :-\
Hanners
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 26, 2016, 07:15:45 PM
ward vs selwood
Jelwood
Quote from: Padawan on April 26, 2016, 04:01:54 PM
Pendlebury Vs Priddis
Pendles
Quote from: WizzFizz on April 26, 2016, 10:24:04 PM
who will make least cash from now
weits vs dea vs bken vs menadue vs oliver
Tough one. I think Dea or Weits as Menadue/BKen have obtainable be's. Oliver be 28 still some cash to be made
Pendles v Selwood v Parker v Priddis v Sidebottom v Ward
Which one?
Quote from: Judd Magic on April 26, 2016, 06:49:06 PM
Hanners vs Parker?
Is there really that much difference between them? :-\
If you take Parkers huge round one score out of the mix and also consider Hanners 92 pt game when he was concussed and missed a qtr, I think it's worth paying the extra for Hanners. At least I hope it is, because that's probably what I'll do.
Quote from: tommy10 on April 26, 2016, 10:47:29 PM
Pendles v Selwood v Parker v Priddis v Sidebottom v Ward
Which one?
Pendles > Jelwood > Priddis > Parker > Ward > Sidey
Imo
Don't rate Parker to keep this up, but most would go him 1 or 2
dont know how much to read into selwoods scores this year thus far. he has monstered some poor teams and good teams he has struggled. but he is getting match fit now, and if he can get back to old selwood he is a lock.
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
i assume you meant hold or trade? :P
if you've got enough cash, definitely trade him. port are awful.
Matty Boyd v Kade Simpson
Quote from: Bubbles on April 27, 2016, 03:08:38 PM
Matty Boyd v Kade Simpson
Kade. Know what you're going to get.
bud, dusty or boomer?
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 27, 2016, 02:44:57 PM
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
i assume you meant hold or trade? :P
if you've got enough cash, definitely trade him. port are awful.
Woops that's what i mean haha... He's just getting cheaper and cheaper with Schulz out so considering keeping rookies like Dea and Kennedy one more week to correct this. Thinking fyfe down to a Parker, ward or sloane or jelwood then westy to a buddy which lets me have money for a downgrade upgrade the following week. Thoughts?
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 03:45:36 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 27, 2016, 02:44:57 PM
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
i assume you meant hold or trade? :P
if you've got enough cash, definitely trade him. port are awful.
Woops that's what i mean haha... He's just getting cheaper and cheaper with Schulz out so considering keeping rookies like Dea and Kennedy one more week to correct this. Thinking fyfe down to a Parker, ward or sloane or jelwood then westy to a buddy which lets me have money for a downgrade upgrade the following week. Thoughts?
yep, sounds good. buddy nice run coming up.
Quote from: Jackross10 on April 27, 2016, 03:41:57 PM
bud, dusty or boomer?
Not Boomer. Buddy could go huge this week, so might be the better pick atm. You'd want Dusty fairly soon as well though I reckon.
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 03:45:36 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 27, 2016, 02:44:57 PM
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
i assume you meant hold or trade? :P
if you've got enough cash, definitely trade him. port are awful.
Woops that's what i mean haha... He's just getting cheaper and cheaper with Schulz out so considering keeping rookies like Dea and Kennedy one more week to correct this. Thinking fyfe down to a Parker, ward or sloane or jelwood then westy to a buddy which lets me have money for a downgrade upgrade the following week. Thoughts?
I almost think it's too late to trade Westhoff. Yes they've been terrible, but how much worse can it get? He's already down to 400k-odd, and has averaged north of 90 for the past 3 years. He's one i'll be looking to bring in when he bottoms out in a few weeks, probably only 20k less than what he is now.
Richmond, Brisbane, Carlton next 3... And this year he's averaged 97 in wins compared with an atrocious 50 in losses.
Quote from: Jackross10 on April 27, 2016, 03:41:57 PM
bud, dusty or boomer?
Buddy for mine.
Dusty needs to score over 100 at least once before I'd consider him.
Hannebery vs Parker
Dea to Priddis, Selwood, Ward or Hanners
Quote from: Mark on April 27, 2016, 06:11:15 PM
Dea to Priddis, Selwood, Ward or Hanners
Hanners out of them, been very consistent with his scoring - Selwood close second
Hanners Vs Pendles + $40K - Originally I've picked Pendles due to Bye reason's, but now leaning towards Hanners as his pumping out 120's weekly & the Bye's are a fair way away.
Quote from: Raiden on April 28, 2016, 09:48:39 AM
Hanners Vs Pendles + $40K - Originally I've picked Pendles due to Bye reason's, but now leaning towards Hanners as his pumping out 120's weekly & the Bye's are a fair way away.
i beleive pendles will outscore hanners from this point on!
Montagna/Hall/Dahlhaus/Z Merrett?
Quote from: B. on April 28, 2016, 11:55:35 AM
Montagna/Hall/Dahlhaus/Z Merrett?
Hall for mine. Super consistent.
I'll ask again.
Hanners vs Parker :P
Quote from: Maca24 on April 28, 2016, 03:47:53 PM
Quote from: B. on April 28, 2016, 11:55:35 AM
Montagna/Hall/Dahlhaus/Z Merrett?
Hall for mine. Super consistent.
I'll ask again.
Hanners vs Parker :P
Hanners just because of less ownership %
Sidebottom v Priddis
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
Similar vein;
Should I trade Wingard? Seeing 0 ball down his half of the ground and Hinkley refusing to give him a crack in the middle. Wingard --> Franklin is super tempting.
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
Just had a look at his scores this year and wow!
PB please explain
Dea to Priddis, Selwood, Ward or Hanners
Quote from: Mark on April 28, 2016, 07:02:17 PM
Dea to Priddis, Selwood, Ward or Hanners
Hanners.
Hannebery vs Pendles vs Selwood?
Already have Danger and now Parker if that makes any difference.
Brought in Hanners and Selwood howver hard to go past Pendles thinking of changing as have Danger and no Pjss yetquote author=Judd Magic link=topic=105273.msg1752969#msg1752969 date=1461844671]
Hannebery vs Pendles vs Selwood?
Already have Danger and now Parker if that makes any difference.
[/quote]
Quote from: Big Mac on April 28, 2016, 06:51:22 PM
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
Just had a look at his scores this year and wow!
PB please explain
Definately not why I picked him however the loss of Schulz has killed him IMO, the first game that they both played and hoff had his usual roaming role he scored 100+ after that when shulz got injured he's been playing full forward, no ball is getting down there same as wingard and hinkley Imo as one of the most one dimensional coaches ever isn't taking advantage of these multi positional players. Therefore Hoffs appalling scores... Which peeses me off more because with his scores I'm still top 5000 lol
Quote from: backpocket on April 29, 2016, 02:08:55 AM
Quote from: Big Mac on April 28, 2016, 06:51:22 PM
Quote from: backpocket on April 27, 2016, 02:32:28 PM
Should I hold or keep westhoff?
Just had a look at his scores this year and wow!
PB please explain
Definately not why I picked him however the loss of Schulz has killed him IMO, the first game that they both played and hoff had his usual roaming role he scored 100+ after that when shulz got injured he's been playing full forward, no ball is getting down there same as wingard and hinkley Imo as one of the most one dimensional coaches ever isn't taking advantage of these multi positional players. Therefore Hoffs appalling scores... Which peeses me off more because with his scores I'm still top 5000 lol
I've watch all their games and I was a big advocate of the Westoff bandwagon preseason ....
It's been like Where's Wally? Monty needs to give him a permanent magnifying glass symbol.
He's being swung back and forward constantly and for many quarters he's been at the wrong end of the momentum, literally have not seen him on the screen near the ball for 10+ minute stretches.
Port continue to bomb long to Dixon every opportunity they get. In the GWS game (i believe), when Westoff played FF he sat in the goal square every time it came in ... with clear instructions to literally watched Dixon contest ... with his only goal for the day coming from 1 spillage over the top for a cheap score. 2 of his goals in other games have actually come from leading up to 15m kick in from a deliberate out of bounds ... it's an absolute joke.
Parker + Hold Bennedy VS Hanners + Bennedy to Pretracca.
Liking Hanners over Parker but need the extra cash to afford him unfortunately.
Quote from: Maca24 on April 28, 2016, 03:47:53 PM
Quote from: B. on April 28, 2016, 11:55:35 AM
Montagna/Hall/Dahlhaus/Z Merrett?
Hall for mine. Super consistent.
I'll ask again.
Hanners vs Parker :P
am really interested if ppl have a comment here, apart from ownership % and price why would you take either 1 over the other?
Selwood, Hanners, Ward or Priddis?
Quote from: vtaced on April 29, 2016, 09:02:54 AM
Selwood, Hanners, Ward or Priddis?
Hanners > Selwood > Priddis > Ward
Quote from: hawkboy80 on April 29, 2016, 05:21:58 AM
Quote from: Maca24 on April 28, 2016, 03:47:53 PM
Quote from: B. on April 28, 2016, 11:55:35 AM
Montagna/Hall/Dahlhaus/Z Merrett?
Hall for mine. Super consistent.
I'll ask again.
Hanners vs Parker :P
am really interested if ppl have a comment here, apart from ownership % and price why would you take either 1 over the other?
hanners will back up last year i think. people have been burnt by parker so theres doubts. but i think this year ultimately you need both. hanners might drop so parker for now is my choice.
had to hold JJ so trading now.
Whose more critical to bring in this week
Heater or Simmo?
Simpson has the lower B/e which he will achieve so on that basis Simpson.
Quote from: hawkboy80 on April 29, 2016, 05:21:58 AM
Quote from: Maca24 on April 28, 2016, 03:47:53 PM
Quote from: B. on April 28, 2016, 11:55:35 AM
Montagna/Hall/Dahlhaus/Z Merrett?
Hall for mine. Super consistent.
I'll ask again.
Hanners vs Parker :P
am really interested if ppl have a comment here, apart from ownership % and price why would you take either 1 over the other?
Imo Hanners is pretty much guaranteed top 6 mids, Parker I'm not 100% on yet (will probably make it into my side at some stage though)
selwood vs ward vs sammitch
Quote from: Ringo on April 29, 2016, 10:17:05 AM
Simpson has the lower B/e which he will achieve so on that basis Simpson.
Thanks ringo, hopefully have enough in the kitty to grab shaw next week
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 29, 2016, 10:39:55 AM
selwood vs ward vs sammitch
I like Ward from that lot, but can't really go wrong with either of the 3.
Dalhaus vs Dusty + 80k
Really considering Dusty now all of a sudden.
Surely has to bounce back, and despite playing poorly is still a Top 13 forward overall.
The extra cash would also be handy :-X
That being said Dollhouse has been a freak and would be a nice addition to my team.
Please help!
Buddy vs dusty
Quote from: backpocket on April 29, 2016, 12:48:40 PM
Buddy vs dusty
based on current form id say buddy playing lions. but martin could monster the power this week.
tough one. long form id say martin. this week buddy.
Quote from: Jimmykidd on April 29, 2016, 12:50:48 PM
Quote from: backpocket on April 29, 2016, 12:48:40 PM
Buddy vs dusty
based on current form id say buddy playing lions. but martin could monster the power this week.
tough one. long form id say martin. this week buddy.
Buddy cheaper and a lower BE and about to play Fitzroy. But knees are not 100% and you know he will be rested - esp with South doing quite well early.
Martin DPP but could wait due to higher BE. Also non football issues making him possibly higher risk.
So Buddy for me this week.
Barlow? (BE 68) Hall? - a couple more to think about though.
Ward-Hanners-Priddis or Selwood plz
same boat, going hanners. even though i already have parker and mills
Quote from: Mark on April 29, 2016, 01:27:50 PM
Ward-Hanners-Priddis or Selwood plz
I'm getting Hanners and one more of these four. Leaning towards Ward or Selwood.
Sloane and Simpson
vs
Pendles and Murphy
Option two probably gives me more points but not sure I want Murphy in my final mids.
Quote from: TomK on April 29, 2016, 04:17:19 PM
Sloane and Simpson
vs
Pendles and Murphy
Option two probably gives me more points but not sure I want Murphy in my final mids.
Easy decision for me.
Apologies if this has already been asked- Pendles vs Parker?
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on April 29, 2016, 05:11:02 PM
Quote from: TomK on April 29, 2016, 04:17:19 PM
Sloane and Simpson
vs
Pendles and Murphy
Option two probably gives me more points but not sure I want Murphy in my final mids.
Easy decision for me.
Apologies if this has already been asked- Pendles vs Parker?
Both Murphy and Libba seems a bit weak though, tough decision.
As for your question, probably Pendles, has more runs on the board but Parker is looking fantastic. Can't go wrong really.
Boyd v Simmo
Hanners Sloane V Parker Priddis
Quote from: GVSKiwi on April 29, 2016, 05:53:35 PM
Boyd v Simmo
Simmo
Quote from: Fid on April 29, 2016, 06:45:45 PM
Hanners Sloane V Parker Priddis
Hanners Sloane imo but can't go wrong with either
Shaw vs M Murphy (+$$$) vs Dahl
Leaning towards Murphy
priddis v parker
trading out Fyfe and Lonergan ... finally
Parker and Simpson
or
Hannerbery and one of 469k DEF or less...KK, Savage, Bartel, Yeo, Smith
Quote from: HotTiges on April 30, 2016, 01:16:22 AM
trading out Fyfe and Lonergan ... finally
Parker and Simpson
or
Hannerbery and one of 469k DEF or less...KK, Savage, Bartel, Yeo, Smith
Parker and Simmo as simmo is a better option than any others named in defence
Hanners vs Parker +40k
The 40k will leave me 78k for a hopeful 1 trade libba to gray in a few weeks
Jelwood vs Ward
Have had Fyfe to Jelly locked in all week but am now thinking Ward might be a better long term pick
Help!
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 30, 2016, 08:16:15 AM
Jelwood vs Ward
Have had Fyfe to Jelly locked in all week but am now thinking Ward might be a better long term pick
Help!
Just traded Jelwood in myself. Ward's habit of getting 80s numerous times a season plus Jelwood's years as a proven 115+ with recent good scoring makes it clear cut IMO.
Selwood-Ward or Hanners ? Could even put Zaha in there I suppose ??
Quote from: steven3 on April 30, 2016, 01:25:41 AM
Quote from: HotTiges on April 30, 2016, 01:16:22 AM
trading out Fyfe and Lonergan ... finally
Parker and Simpson
or
Hannerbery and one of 469k DEF or less...KK, Savage, Bartel, Yeo, Smith
Parker and Simmo as simmo is a better option than any others named in defence
Hanners vs Parker +40k
The 40k will leave me 78k for a hopeful 1 trade libba to gray in a few weeks
Hanners
Quote from: Mark on April 30, 2016, 08:36:26 AM
Selwood-Ward or Hanners ? Could even put Zaha in there I suppose ??
I'm getting Jelwood myself
Ward is tempting though
Quote from: GoLions on April 29, 2016, 07:42:00 PM
Shaw vs M Murphy (+$$$) vs Dahl
Leaning towards Murphy
Ok so not Dahl now
Quote from: GoLions on April 30, 2016, 10:15:45 AM
Quote from: GoLions on April 29, 2016, 07:42:00 PM
Shaw vs M Murphy (+$$$) vs Dahl
Leaning towards Murphy
Ok so not Dahl now
You probably should've gone Dahl haha. But, seriously, I'd go Shaw because he's a certain keeper. I have no faith in Murphy being a top 10-12 mid.
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on April 30, 2016, 08:16:15 AM
Jelwood vs Ward
Have had Fyfe to Jelly locked in all week but am now thinking Ward might be a better long term pick
Help!
Same decision for me. I really like the look of Ward this year, but he hurt me in the latter part of the season last year. But my teams starting to really look same same, so might grab him as a pod
Still stuck on Pendles vs Jelwood. Will Pendles play in mids from now on...?? :-\
Was thinking Pendles but Jelwood has posted a couple of big scores.
Grimley or Cox ?
Jelwood looks a must now, but I went Priddis.
Had a gut feeling from the start of the week that Matty was going to do well.
Pittard vs Houli?
Looking to get one of these guys next week for Tippa.
I'm leaning towards Bachar since the scars of having Pittard last year are still healing :(
For argument's sake, let's say they both score 90+
EDIT: Could get McVeigh too, assuming he drops a bit more. But 2 of these 3 will come in to complete my backline I'd say, just have to pick the right ones
Simmo vs M Boyd?
Kade misses less games, but Boyd has the potential to score a little higher, though is nearly finished his Etihad Stadium run.
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 02, 2016, 06:20:48 PM
Simmo vs M Boyd?
Kade misses less games, but Boyd has the potential to score a little higher, though is nearly finished his Etihad Stadium run.
+1
boyd hitting form but will definitely miss games. simmo mr consistant. think ill be getting simo for weits
Boyd v Houli v Simpson
Thinking Boyd although the fear of missing games is there. Just think that with the dogs losing Murph all year and JJ for at least half of it, they can't really rest him because their draw gets tough from here and to drop anymore games (they're 4-2) might hinder any possibility of a top 4 spot. Saying that, because I believe him to be the best scorer out of the 3 and is coming off back to back 120's.
Can't go Shaw until later on now which is a bummer but gonna have to live with it.
I like Simpson more than Boyd, he is just the kind of consistency and you know exactly what your gonna get. He's a safe bet. Boyd would be next for me... dont like the draw coming up for the dogs, and we still dont know how they are going to go outside of etihad!
houli is last for me... i have him but he is an absolute rollercoaster... gotta love the 140 but will come out next week and crack a 50!
Selwood V Dahlhaus
I dunno, Simpson won't continue to average 100, whereas Boyd could easily go 105.
Jelwood easy, depends on team structure though
Quote from: mzunguman on May 03, 2016, 10:39:38 AM
I like Simpson more than Boyd, he is just the kind of consistency and you know exactly what your gonna get. He's a safe bet. Boyd would be next for me... dont like the draw coming up for the dogs, and we still dont know how they are going to go outside of etihad!
houli is last for me... i have him but he is an absolute rollercoaster... gotta love the 140 but will come out next week and crack a 50!
Selwood V Dahlhaus
Easy.
He is back to his best with Danger by his side.
Plus the dogs have a few tough games on the road coming up in the next month.
Dogs play Crows/Dees/GWS/Pies/WC
Cats play WC/Crows/Pies/Blus/GWS
HAHA it's almost the same.
Quote from: _wato on May 03, 2016, 10:42:46 AM
I dunno, Simpson won't continue to average 100, whereas Boyd could easily go 105.
Jelwood easy, depends on team structure though
Taking Jelwood would give me 6 premiums + Libba
Simpson might not average 100, but I feel definetly 95ish! Boyd hasn't played a full season for 3/4 years! He'll miss a few matches so does Boyd missing matches still outweigh someone like simpson? I personally would take the security of simpson :)
Parker v Ward v Selwood
if starting from scratch, prob selwood, ward, parker.
ward/parker likely to be my last decision in mids. soft spot for Ward so probably go his way.
menadue or davis for the chop?
Quote from: ants on May 04, 2016, 11:53:00 AM
menadue or davis for the chop?
Both have a similar BE however I think Davis will get the chop this week, has been very uninspiring.
Quote from: Bully on May 04, 2016, 01:02:47 PM
Quote from: ants on May 04, 2016, 11:53:00 AM
menadue or davis for the chop?
Both have a similar BE however I think Davis will get the chop this week, has been very uninspiring.
+1
Selwood v Pendlebury to bring in this week for Weitering?
Quote from: AaronKirk on May 04, 2016, 02:12:19 PM
Selwood v Pendlebury to bring in this week for Weitering?
Can't go wrong with either but on current form you have to go with Selwood.
Shaw vs any other defender?
Quote from: steven3 on May 04, 2016, 02:50:39 PM
Quote from: AaronKirk on May 04, 2016, 02:12:19 PM
Selwood v Pendlebury to bring in this week for Weitering?
Can't go wrong with either but on current form you have to go with Selwood.
Shaw vs any other defender?
Shaw
Ward v Rocky?
Average in the bank, top dollar v potential, bargain basement!?
Rocky but biased - Slowly getting back to his best. Probably at his lowest price at the moment so time to jump if you want him.
Simpson v Docherty v Houli place in order please,
Quote from: Ringo on May 05, 2016, 05:47:06 PM
Rocky but biased - Slowly getting back to his best. Probably at his lowest price at the moment so time to jump if you want him.
Simpson v Docherty v Houli place in order please,
The order you have them in IMO. 8)
Quote from: Ringo on May 05, 2016, 05:47:06 PM
Rocky but biased - Slowly getting back to his best. Probably at his lowest price at the moment so time to jump if you want him.
Simpson v Docherty v Houli place in order please,
I think the order you have them purely for consistency.
Thank You as I am trying to work out trades and which defender to get Means I have to trade Bennedy rather than Menadue to get Simmo but I can wear that,
Option 1. menadue-fyfe > j smith and Shaw
Option 2. menadue-fyfe> j smith and rocky
Have Laird on the Pine and will have to Play DBJ or Tucker if option 1 and both if option 2.
Leaning towards Option 1 as Rocky will still be gettable price next week.
also mid on field
Bennedy, Mills, Kerridge, Davis, Hewett and J Smith. Need 3.
ATM Kerridge, Mills and J Smith is my thinking. If Kerridge doesnt start will play Bennedy.
Quote from: crowls on May 05, 2016, 06:34:06 PM
Option 1. menadue-fyfe > j smith and Shaw
Option 2. menadue-fyfe> j smith and rocky
Have Laird on the Pine and will have to Play DBJ or Tucker if option 1 and both if option 2.
Leaning towards Option 1 as Rocky will still be gettable price next week.
also mid on field
Bennedy, Mills, Kerridge, Davis, Hewett and J Smith. Need 3.
ATM Kerridge, Mills and J Smith is my thinking. If Kerridge doesnt start will play Bennedy.
Option one for me mate, i just can't trust rocky yet.
Sloane V Treloar V Neale or just get Zorko up fwd....?
Buddy vs Greene vs Barlow? (Means trading Barlow back in, :/ leaning on Bud)
Quote from: Gandalf123 on May 05, 2016, 10:05:49 PM
Quote from: crowls on May 05, 2016, 06:34:06 PM
Option 1. menadue-fyfe > j smith and Shaw
Option 2. menadue-fyfe> j smith and rocky
Have Laird on the Pine and will have to Play DBJ or Tucker if option 1 and both if option 2.
Leaning towards Option 1 as Rocky will still be gettable price next week.
also mid on field
Bennedy, Mills, Kerridge, Davis, Hewett and J Smith. Need 3.
ATM Kerridge, Mills and J Smith is my thinking. If Kerridge doesnt start will play Bennedy.
Option one for me mate, i just can't trust rocky yet.
Sloane V Treloar V Neale or just get Zorko up fwd....?
Zorko a top 6 forward, not sure any of them are top 8 mids so Zorko for sure!
Quote from: Raiden on May 05, 2016, 10:12:42 PM
Buddy vs Greene vs Barlow? (Means trading Barlow back in, :/ leaning on Bud)
Probably shouldn't have traded Barlow out :/ But Buddy this week because he's playing Essendon
Quote from: Gandalf123 on May 05, 2016, 10:05:49 PM
Quote from: crowls on May 05, 2016, 06:34:06 PM
Option 1. menadue-fyfe > j smith and Shaw
Option 2. menadue-fyfe> j smith and rocky
Have Laird on the Pine and will have to Play DBJ or Tucker if option 1 and both if option 2.
Leaning towards Option 1 as Rocky will still be gettable price next week.
also mid on field
Bennedy, Mills, Kerridge, Davis, Hewett and J Smith. Need 3.
ATM Kerridge, Mills and J Smith is my thinking. If Kerridge doesnt start will play Bennedy.
Option one for me mate, i just can't trust rocky yet.
Sloane V Treloar V Neale or just get Zorko up fwd....?
Zorks
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:14:27 PM
Quote from: Gandalf123 on May 05, 2016, 10:05:49 PM
Quote from: crowls on May 05, 2016, 06:34:06 PM
Option 1. menadue-fyfe > j smith and Shaw
Option 2. menadue-fyfe> j smith and rocky
Have Laird on the Pine and will have to Play DBJ or Tucker if option 1 and both if option 2.
Leaning towards Option 1 as Rocky will still be gettable price next week.
also mid on field
Bennedy, Mills, Kerridge, Davis, Hewett and J Smith. Need 3.
ATM Kerridge, Mills and J Smith is my thinking. If Kerridge doesnt start will play Bennedy.
Option one for me mate, i just can't trust rocky yet.
Sloane V Treloar V Neale or just get Zorko up fwd....?
Zorko a top 6 forward, not sure any of them are top 8 mids so Zorko for sure!
Quote from: Raiden on May 05, 2016, 10:12:42 PM
Buddy vs Greene vs Barlow? (Means trading Barlow back in, :/ leaning on Bud)
Probably shouldn't have traded Barlow out :/ But Buddy this week because he's playing Essendon
Yeah i know mate, was a stupid rage trade to Merret -Thinking Buddy also.
Shaw or Parker this week? Will eventually get both, both should be good this week. Tough call :/
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:18:26 PM
Shaw or Parker this week? Will eventually get both, both should be good this week. Tough call :/
Depends on your lines, if you have 6 mids then grab Shaw with a low be. If your mids aren't that strong then Parks, bonus with Parks his also Capt material atm.
Quote from: Raiden on May 05, 2016, 10:20:23 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:18:26 PM
Shaw or Parker this week? Will eventually get both, both should be good this week. Tough call :/
Depends on your lines, if you have 6 mids then grab Shaw with a low be. If your mids aren't that strong then Parks, bonus with Parks his also Capt material atm.
My mids are way stronger than backs atm. Holding Laird and Rance through zeros this week so gotta play some bad rooks. Might make more sense to get Shaw.
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:23:52 PM
Quote from: Raiden on May 05, 2016, 10:20:23 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:18:26 PM
Shaw or Parker this week? Will eventually get both, both should be good this week. Tough call :/
Depends on your lines, if you have 6 mids then grab Shaw with a low be. If your mids aren't that strong then Parks, bonus with Parks his also Capt material atm.
My mids are way stronger than backs atm. Holding Laird and Rance through zeros this week so gotta play some bad rooks. Might make more sense to get Shaw.
Yeah 110% grab Shaw if you have Laird & Rance on the pine.
Quote from: Raiden on May 05, 2016, 10:25:20 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:23:52 PM
Quote from: Raiden on May 05, 2016, 10:20:23 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:18:26 PM
Shaw or Parker this week? Will eventually get both, both should be good this week. Tough call :/
Depends on your lines, if you have 6 mids then grab Shaw with a low be. If your mids aren't that strong then Parks, bonus with Parks his also Capt material atm.
My mids are way stronger than backs atm. Holding Laird and Rance through zeros this week so gotta play some bad rooks. Might make more sense to get Shaw.
Yeah 110% grab Shaw if you have Laird & Rance on the pine.
+1. No brainier with two Defensive premiums on the pine.
Simpson v Boyd.... Been asked, looking for another opinion
Quote from: mzunguman on May 05, 2016, 10:41:04 PM
Simpson v Boyd.... Been asked, looking for another opinion
I broke my 'No Simpson EVER' rule last week.
Trading Weitering for either Zorko or NRoo.
Quote from: Hoggyz_a_legend on May 05, 2016, 11:13:45 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 05, 2016, 10:41:04 PM
Simpson v Boyd.... Been asked, looking for another opinion
I broke my 'No Simpson EVER' rule last week.
Trading Weitering for either Zorko or NRoo.
Zorko easy
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:23:52 PM
Quote from: Raiden on May 05, 2016, 10:20:23 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:18:26 PM
Shaw or Parker this week? Will eventually get both, both should be good this week. Tough call :/
Depends on your lines, if you have 6 mids then grab Shaw with a low be. If your mids aren't that strong then Parks, bonus with Parks his also Capt material atm.
My mids are way stronger than backs atm. Holding Laird and Rance through zeros this week so gotta play some bad rooks. Might make more sense to get Shaw.
I've got Laird and Rance too, who are you turfing in the backs to bring shaw in? all my on field rooks are still mooing and the ones filling in are fresh or haven't made enough so think i'm copping the 4 rooks down back this week and grabbing Zorko, Defense upgrade next week.
Quote from: Gandalf123 on May 05, 2016, 11:47:22 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:23:52 PM
Quote from: Raiden on May 05, 2016, 10:20:23 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 05, 2016, 10:18:26 PM
Shaw or Parker this week? Will eventually get both, both should be good this week. Tough call :/
Depends on your lines, if you have 6 mids then grab Shaw with a low be. If your mids aren't that strong then Parks, bonus with Parks his also Capt material atm.
My mids are way stronger than backs atm. Holding Laird and Rance through zeros this week so gotta play some bad rooks. Might make more sense to get Shaw.
I've got Laird and Rance too, who are you turfing in the backs to bring shaw in? all my on field rooks are still mooing and the ones filling in are fresh or haven't made enough so think i'm copping the 4 rooks down back this week and grabbing Zorko, Defense upgrade next week.
Parish and Weitering out, Josh Smith and Shaw in. Even after that I've still got Adams, Byrne-Jones, Dea, Brown, and McTip. Need to trade the three Essendon boys soon but got no downgrade options.
Quote from: mzunguman on May 05, 2016, 10:41:04 PM
Simpson v Boyd.... Been asked, looking for another opinion
I've gone with Boyd. Can't simply be coincidence that he's scored two 120's since Bob and JJ went down!
Shaw & Tippa & Petracca V Zorko & Adams & M.Brown
these are the results of my 2 trade options this week and what i will have to field for each one, not sure which looks healthier, leaning towards Zorko but Shaw should sky rocket in price this week and would be a good get, but then Adams still has a bit of cash and has been playing well enough anyway... help
J.Smith vs B.Kennedy vs Petracca
Have to start 2 out of these 3 for this weekend and can't decide!
Rich vs Bartel...already have shaw simmo laird cheers
Quote from: Maca24 on May 06, 2016, 05:51:40 PM
J.Smith vs B.Kennedy vs Petracca
Have to start 2 out of these 3 for this weekend and can't decide!
Me too! Thinking of benching Kennedy.
Zorko vs Montags vs Dusty
Quote from: HotTiges on May 09, 2016, 12:25:46 AM
Zorko vs Montags vs Dusty
You know you can't split them.
Dusty has the lowest BE this week so him.
Byes?
Quote from: HotTiges on May 09, 2016, 12:25:46 AM
Zorko vs Montags vs Dusty
Great Question that I think a Lot will be asking this week. 1: Zorko, consistency With Rocky out again 2: Montags, big POD and could be anything but older 3: Dusty, Past seasons gives him credits, cheap but not the old dusty.
Zorko>Montag>Dusty
Boyd vs Simpson vs Docherty?
Boyd most expensive notbymuch but has lowest BE notbymuch
Quote from: tor01doc on May 09, 2016, 01:13:41 AM
Boyd vs Simpson vs Docherty?
Boyd most expensive notbymuch but has lowest BE notbymuch
Boyd > Simmo > Doc
Only issue is that Boyd is due for a rest...
Probably have both eventually but:
Zorko (Fwd) Vs Ward.
Banking on McCarthy dropped so I can cash in either Adams or Tippa to afford this trade.
Rance vs Boyd vs Simpson ??
Quote from: Ingram on May 09, 2016, 04:06:06 AM
Probably have both eventually but:
Zorko (Fwd) Vs Ward.
Banking on McCarthy dropped so I can cash in either Adams or Tippa to afford this trade.
Ward out of those 2
Quote from: Sicko on May 09, 2016, 11:11:57 AM
Rance vs Boyd vs Simpson ??
Really tough to split, but I'd go Simpson
How about Pittard vs McVeigh vs Bartel?
Ben Kennedy to Zorko v McCarthy to Gunston v Adams to Boyd
Quote from: enzedder on May 10, 2016, 06:40:35 AM
Ben Kennedy to Zorko v McCarthy to Gunston v Adams to Boyd
Kennedy has a BE of 27 - wait.
Gunston not good enough for your final team IMO
So
Adams (who may well miss more than one week) into Boyd who is pretty cheap atm
Macpherson (1 game, 77 pts, $102k)
V
Keays (2 games, 61.5 avg, $117k)
Boyd, Simpson or McVeigh to replace Adams?? Money not an issue
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 10, 2016, 08:31:54 AM
Macpherson (1 game, 77 pts, $102k)
V
Keays (2 games, 61.5 avg, $117k)
Macpherson
Quote from: vtaced on May 10, 2016, 08:50:43 AM
Boyd, Simpson or McVeigh to replace Adams?? Money not an issue
Honestly can't pick but someone posted that he thought Boyd could get a rest at some stage.
Check your bye structure to decide.
DPP?
Shaw (Avg 105 - $581K) VS Simmo (Avg 103 - $534K) + Bank the extra $47K
Quote from: Raiden on May 10, 2016, 11:54:36 AM
Shaw (Avg 105 - $581K) VS Simmo (Avg 103 - $534K) + Bank the extra $47K
Shaw for sure
Dahl and Dea vs Boyd and Papley?
Quote from: tor01doc on May 10, 2016, 08:12:43 AM
Quote from: enzedder on May 10, 2016, 06:40:35 AM
Ben Kennedy to Zorko v McCarthy to Gunston v Adams to Boyd
Kennedy has a BE of 27 - wait.
Gunston not good enough for your final team IMO
So
Adams (who may well miss more than one week) into Boyd who is pretty cheap atm
Solid reasoning....Thanks doc...been struggling with it as pros/cons in all the above...now thinking McCarthy to Z Merrett ... so that over Adams to Boyd?
Quote from: tor01doc on May 10, 2016, 12:06:34 PM
Quote from: Raiden on May 10, 2016, 11:54:36 AM
Shaw (Avg 105 - $581K) VS Simmo (Avg 103 - $534K) + Bank the extra $47K
Shaw for sure
Agree in this case it's simply not Simmo.
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2016, 05:00:09 PM
Dahl and Dea vs Boyd and Papley?
If it's to play I'd go the first... if a trade is involved in an upgrade I'd keep Papley with A break even of 20ish
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2016, 05:00:09 PM
Dahl and Dea vs Boyd and Papley?
If it's to play I'd go the first... if a trade is involved in an upgrade I'd keep Papley with A break even of 20ish
[/quote]
Yeah trades are involved. Just realised Boyd has 72 BE, so will go him especially with Laird out too.
Dusty v Buddy
rance vs docherty ?
already have kade
Quote from: tttt on May 10, 2016, 07:15:49 PM
rance vs docherty ?
already have kade
Rance
Do you have Shaw?
Quote from: Fid on May 10, 2016, 07:34:21 PM
Quote from: tttt on May 10, 2016, 07:15:49 PM
rance vs docherty ?
already have kade
Rance
Do you have Shaw?
yup shaw, laird, kade atm
rance or doch in this week
considering doch coz he's 75k cheaper, which could be useful later on
Quote from: tttt on May 10, 2016, 07:49:34 PM
Quote from: Fid on May 10, 2016, 07:34:21 PM
Quote from: tttt on May 10, 2016, 07:15:49 PM
rance vs docherty ?
already have kade
Rance
Do you have Shaw?
yup shaw, laird, kade atm
rance or doch in this week
considering doch coz he's 75k cheaper, which could be useful later on
Would go Doch for cash saving.
Rance vs Boyd
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2016, 09:24:24 PM
Rance vs Boyd
Boyd. Rance on Buddy this week, so I'm a bit less confident on how he will score. I think both will be top 6 defenders though.
Dahlhaus vs Zorko.
Reasoning would be appreciated :)
Quote from: MontyJnr on May 10, 2016, 09:53:40 PM
Dahlhaus vs Zorko.
Reasoning would be appreciated :)
Zorko, because it starts with a Z
Quote from: MontyJnr on May 10, 2016, 09:53:40 PM
Dahlhaus vs Zorko.
Reasoning would be appreciated :)
Zorko
Averaging more, shown he can score with other top team mates both in and out of the side and in both wins and thumpings, and is scoring great all over Australia whereas Dahl hasn't left Etihad
Both top picks, but Zorko is the one I want asap
Zorko v Ward
Quote from: RaisyDaisy on May 10, 2016, 09:59:21 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on May 10, 2016, 09:53:40 PM
Dahlhaus vs Zorko.
Reasoning would be appreciated :)
Zorko
Averaging more, shown he can score with other top team mates both in and out of the side and in both wins and thumpings, and is scoring great all over Australia whereas Dahl hasn't left Etihad
Both top picks, but Zorko is the one I want asap
Thanks :)
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2016, 11:54:05 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 10, 2016, 10:04:40 PM
Zorko v Ward
Ward just imo
It's a tough one. You'd reckon Zorko is more likely of being a top 5 forward than Ward is of being a top 5 mid. However, short term Ward could score more, and if you're gonna get both eventually, and I assume there's a chance that he could be playing in the midfield of ftc's team, then it might be better to grab Ward. Maybe depends on how strong mid line is compared to fwd line?
Quote from: GoLions on May 10, 2016, 11:57:11 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2016, 11:54:05 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 10, 2016, 10:04:40 PM
Zorko v Ward
Ward just imo
It's a tough one. You'd reckon Zorko is more likely of being a top 5 forward than Ward is of being a top 5 mid. However, short term Ward could score more, and if you're gonna get both eventually, and I assume there's a chance that he could be playing in the midfield of ftc's team, then it might be better to grab Ward. Maybe depends on how strong mid line is compared to fwd line?
Whoever I choose would indeed be starting in the Mids, and if chosen, Zork would obviously find his way down to the Fwds eventually. I would definitely like to end up with Zork at some stage based on the way he is travelling, and Ward is looking pretty good at the moment.
Here's the side,
Mid: Danger, Parker, Hanners,
Ward/Zork, Gaz, Libba, B Ken, B Crouch (Hewett, Davis, Smith)
Fwd: Hall, Dusty, Wells, Barlow, Kerridge, Papley (McCarthy, Petracca)
I'd say that the Fwd line is considerably stronger based on expectations for each line for the time being. I'd be happy to field Petracca from my Fwd pine, but no one from my Mid pine should be near the field
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 11, 2016, 12:09:21 AM
Quote from: GoLions on May 10, 2016, 11:57:11 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2016, 11:54:05 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 10, 2016, 10:04:40 PM
Zorko v Ward
Ward just imo
It's a tough one. You'd reckon Zorko is more likely of being a top 5 forward than Ward is of being a top 5 mid. However, short term Ward could score more, and if you're gonna get both eventually, and I assume there's a chance that he could be playing in the midfield of ftc's team, then it might be better to grab Ward. Maybe depends on how strong mid line is compared to fwd line?
Whoever I choose would indeed be starting in the Mids, and if chosen, Zork would obviously find his way down to the Fwds eventually. I would definitely like to end up with Zork at some stage based on the way he is travelling, and Ward is looking pretty good at the moment.
Here's the side,
Mid: Danger, Parker, Hanners, Ward/Zork, Gaz, Libba, B Ken, B Crouch (Hewett, Davis, Smith)
Fwd: Hall, Dusty, Wells, Barlow, Kerridge, Papley (McCarthy, Petracca)
Can you grab Z this week and play him fwd?
Wells may wells miss
Quote from: tor01doc on May 11, 2016, 12:11:02 AM
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 11, 2016, 12:09:21 AM
Quote from: GoLions on May 10, 2016, 11:57:11 PM
Quote from: tommy10 on May 10, 2016, 11:54:05 PM
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 10, 2016, 10:04:40 PM
Zorko v Ward
Ward just imo
It's a tough one. You'd reckon Zorko is more likely of being a top 5 forward than Ward is of being a top 5 mid. However, short term Ward could score more, and if you're gonna get both eventually, and I assume there's a chance that he could be playing in the midfield of ftc's team, then it might be better to grab Ward. Maybe depends on how strong mid line is compared to fwd line?
Whoever I choose would indeed be starting in the Mids, and if chosen, Zork would obviously find his way down to the Fwds eventually. I would definitely like to end up with Zork at some stage based on the way he is travelling, and Ward is looking pretty good at the moment.
Here's the side,
Mid: Danger, Parker, Hanners, Ward/Zork, Gaz, Libba, B Ken, B Crouch (Hewett, Davis, Smith)
Fwd: Hall, Dusty, Wells, Barlow, Kerridge, Papley (McCarthy, Petracca)
Can you grab Z this week and play him fwd?
Wells may wells miss
I suppose I could play Zorko up front if Wells is to miss, put Petracca on field at M8.
But is that any different to swapping Wells with Petracca and fielding Zorko at M4?
No but means you may be better getting Z this week rather than Ward...
BUT I haven't had a really in depth look at your squad because it is making me hate mine even more than I already do.
Quote from: tor01doc on May 11, 2016, 12:15:08 AM
No but means you may be better getting Z this week rather than Ward...
BUT I haven't had a really in depth look at your squad because it is making me hate mine even more than I already do.
I hate my team too. I feel like a neglecting father who drinks a lot, and wants to give my team up for adoption.
I've already bought the big plastic bags and the bricks..
McVeigh vs Simpson.
Will Simmo throw out a dud score or two? Doesn't look like it at the moment. BE still fairly low. McVeigh should drop a bit more in price.
Got Boyd last week, so not sure if getting Simmo is spending a bit much down back? Would leave me with -
Shaw, Boyd, ??, Laird, Adams, DBJ (Brown, Tippa).
Keeping Adams and will swing him Fwd via McCarthy to open up Fwd/Def DPP again and give me cover this week down back. Or just trade Adams?
Quote from: no eye deer on May 11, 2016, 09:29:58 AM
McVeigh vs Simpson.
Will Simmo throw out a dud score or two? Doesn't look like it at the moment. BE still fairly low. McVeigh should drop a bit more in price.
Got Boyd last week, so not sure if getting Simmo is spending a bit much down back? Would leave me with -
Shaw, Boyd, ??, Laird, Adams, DBJ (Brown, Tippa).
Keeping Adams and will swing him Fwd via McCarthy to open up Fwd/Def DPP again and give me cover this week down back. Or just trade Adams?
I like McVeigh, priced quite well & can possibly further drop in price again this week. Had no pre-season but is starting to find form.
Z. Merrett Vs Buddy
Pendles or Selwood?
Quote from: roo boys! on May 12, 2016, 03:34:39 PM
Pendles or Selwood?
Selwood but ideally you would want both in your final team IMO.
McVeigh or Motlop
Walters or Gunston
Quote from: whynot102 on May 12, 2016, 09:14:18 PM
McVeigh or Motlop
mcVeigh for stability. Motlop for higher ceiling
Which one to play? Petracca, Papley or Menadue.
Thinking Petracca.
Quote from: enzedder on May 12, 2016, 10:03:03 PM
Which one to play? Petracca, Papley or Menadue.
Thinking Petracca.
Definitely Petracca
Gunston vs Zerrett?
Quote from: Jay on May 12, 2016, 10:15:32 PM
Gunston vs Zerrett?
That's been my decision to make too. Going Zerrett. Midfielder who lays claim to being one of the best players in the team. Nothing wrong with Gunston though. He's cheaper but I think Zerrett just has less competition for points and will be more consistent.
Zorko vs. Gunstan
Possibly last fwd spot to go with:
Hall - Franklin - Martin
Barlow - Wells - ???
On a side note: is anyone else struggling with the forwards this year? So many good options! I can't work out who I do an don't want. Everyone I have is playing so well (Barlow???), but I don't have Zorko, Gunstan, Dalhouse or Merret. Not sure if it is a good or bad thing!
Buddy v Dusty don't have either and want to bring one in this week
Quote from: Bubbles on May 13, 2016, 11:05:14 AM
Buddy v Dusty don't have either and want to bring one in this week
My rule is DPP over KPP every day of the week.
Merrett vs Docherty vs Gibson
Quote from: crowls on May 13, 2016, 11:33:26 AM
Quote from: Bubbles on May 13, 2016, 11:05:14 AM
Buddy v Dusty don't have either and want to bring one in this week
My rule is DPP over KPP every day of the week.
Docherty Rance or McVeigh
Quote from: whynot102 on May 13, 2016, 10:05:27 PM
Docherty Rance or McVeigh
Docherty first then McVeigh then Rance. BUT get all three. ;)
Avoid Docherty, scores poorly against tough(er) opponents
Quote from: TomK on May 13, 2016, 03:43:12 PM
Merrett vs Docherty vs Gibson
Merret > docherty > gibbo
Highest ceiling, stability in dochers
Docherty(D2) + Smith(M8) vs Priddis(M7) + Brown(D6)
Quote from: WizzFizz on May 16, 2016, 07:41:04 AM
Docherty(D2) + Smith(M8) vs Priddis(M7) + Brown(D6)
Option 1 mate.
You do not want Brown at D6.
Gibson 477.2k vs Enright 470.3k vs bartel 495.7k.
Quote from: Knowall on May 16, 2016, 06:32:18 PM
Gibson 477.2k vs Enright 470.3k vs bartel 495.7k.
Bartel.
Docherty or Bartel? :-\
Already have Simpson.
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 16, 2016, 08:42:13 PM
Docherty or Bartel? :-\
Already have Simpson.
Docherty by a country mile
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 13, 2016, 10:55:44 PM
Avoid Docherty, scores poorly against tough(er) opponents
Vs Freo (18th) 62
Vs Ess (17th) 76
Averaging 113.5 against teams higher than 16th on the ladder.
He'll do me.
Docherty vs Treloar upgrade Brown or Bennedy
:)
Motlop v Dahlhaus
:-\
Enright vs Bartel?
Also looking at Pittard and McVeigh..
Love Enright as a POD, but Bartel seems to have found some form
Quote from: jfitty on May 17, 2016, 10:18:30 AM
Enright vs Bartel?
Also looking at Pittard and McVeigh..
Love Enright as a POD, but Bartel seems to have found some form
Bartel over Enright in that Bartel has been a better SC pick and being a utility he has many ways to score. If on the ball or given free license he rakes in the points. Nothing wrong with Enright coming in this week as he has bottomed out with his low score. Proven defender and averaging well but think Bartel will average more from here in.
McVeigh over Pittard as Pittard sucks. Had him last year after he was in all Australian form early, didn't last and he didn't stay in my team. Think his bubble will burst again and when he scores low it is real low.
McVeigh on the other hand is proven and cheap... I'm still watching him and think I'll get him... He is cheap atm having lost 70k. He has a BE of 125ish this week too.
If you have to get one this week I'd recommend Jimmy but McVeigh could be the way to go next week... Juicy.... I almost wouldn't mind if he tonned up this weekend... Will still lose cash and show he can still produce. As it is he's got consistent 80s which is okay for a defender.
Brand v Macpherson
Lewis v Priddis
Quote from: mzunguman on May 17, 2016, 03:00:25 PM
Brand v Macpherson
Depends on your team mate. Macpherson should outscore Brand, though there are more mid rookies on the horizon than def rookies. Macpherson being a round 13 bye player means he probably won't be ready to trade before his bye either.
Quote from: MC on May 18, 2016, 07:55:42 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 17, 2016, 03:00:25 PM
Brand v Macpherson
Depends on your team mate. Macpherson should outscore Brand, though there are more mid rookies on the horizon than def rookies. Macpherson being a round 13 bye player means he probably won't be ready to trade before his bye either.
Seeing as Matheison is going to debut I think I'll be going brand instead
Thanks everyone
zorko vs joey vs dahl
Quote from: Jimmykidd on May 19, 2016, 08:56:17 PM
zorko vs joey vs dahl
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Dusty vs Montagna?
Adams and Crouch gone...but to who?
Brand Zorko or Docherty Macherson
Quote from: enzedder on May 20, 2016, 03:33:33 PM
Adams and Crouch gone...but to who?
Brand Zorko or Docherty Macherson
I think Brand and Zorko - who knows when def rooks will come up.
Priddis v Sloane?
Quote from: enzedder on May 20, 2016, 03:33:33 PM
Adams and Crouch gone...but to who?
Brand Zorko or Docherty Macherson
Hard to know without seeing your full team Enz. All things being equal, after considering bye balance, cash flow and future trades, Zorko has been ultra consistent and Dochers will be cheaper later on. Paying full price for any defender except Heater is money lost I reckon. They always come down. Macpherson looks pretty safe for now, given GCS issues. Matheison on the horizon though. Do you have a spot for him?
Quote from: Thewizz71 on May 20, 2016, 03:36:58 PM
Quote from: enzedder on May 20, 2016, 03:33:33 PM
Adams and Crouch gone...but to who?
Brand Zorko or Docherty Macherson
I think Brand and Zorko - who knows when def rooks will come up.
Priddis v Sloane?
I like Sloane, tackling machine who seems to have hit his straps!... still not sold on Priddis' form as well
Neale + 60K v Hanners v Joey + 95k... ????
Quote from: Thewizz71 on May 20, 2016, 03:36:58 PM
Quote from: enzedder on May 20, 2016, 03:33:33 PM
Adams and Crouch gone...but to who?
Brand Zorko or Docherty Macherson
I think Brand and Zorko - who knows when def rooks will come up.
Priddis v Sloane?
Priddis but merit in Sloane. Like both.
Quote from: PICCOLLO on May 20, 2016, 03:39:04 PM
Quote from: enzedder on May 20, 2016, 03:33:33 PM
Adams and Crouch gone...but to who?
Brand Zorko or Docherty Macherson
Hard to know without seeing your full team Enz. All things being equal, after considering bye balance, cash flow and future trades, Zorko has been ultra consistent and Dochers will be cheaper later on. Paying full price for any defender except Heater is money lost I reckon. They always come down. Macpherson looks pretty safe for now, given GCS issues. Matheison on the horizon though. Do you have a spot for him?
Yeah mate. Still got Oliver, Bennedy, Menadue or even Wells to swing into mids for downgrade/ upgrade in coming rounds. Only 3 premium defenders atm... Rance, Shaw & Laird so with Laird out Docherty gives support down back this week but if I go Docherty I've got to field Menadue.
Thinking I'll do defenders last... Docherty is at a relatively high price, though BE is low... If he will be cheaper it will be much later...prefer Zorko as an upgrade all the same. Still weighing it up.
Simpson or Docherty? Can't split them.
I like Simpson but worried he will be rested more often.
Thoughts?
Quote from: pikla on May 20, 2016, 07:40:37 PM
Simpson or Docherty? Can't split them.
I like Simpson but worried he will be rested more often.
Thoughts?
i like them both! and will have both in finals team!
Barlow > Montagna or Wells > Montagna
Menadue on the ground if I go Barlow > Montagna
Menadue not on the ground if Barlow is a late in and I go Wells > Montagna.
Which option:
1.Wells to Bartel + 220k. With Laird will give me 4 premos (Shaw, Simmo the other premos)
2. Wells to Montagna + 185k
3. Wells to Dahl + 148k (prob won't have enough to upgrade to mid premo next week)
Already have Zorko, Dusty, Barlow and Hall.
Quote from: ants on May 20, 2016, 07:55:29 PM
Quote from: pikla on May 20, 2016, 07:40:37 PM
Simpson or Docherty? Can't split them.
I like Simpson but worried he will be rested more often.
Thoughts?
i like them both! and will have both in finals team!
Simmo !!! Docherty after the bye.
Quote from: pikla on May 20, 2016, 07:40:37 PM
Simpson or Docherty? Can't split them.
I like Simpson but worried he will be rested more often.
Thoughts?
Simpson is a machine I doubt he will be rested
I'm going Docherty though to save a little $$
Quote from: Big Mac on May 21, 2016, 12:35:26 AM
Quote from: pikla on May 20, 2016, 07:40:37 PM
Simpson or Docherty? Can't split them.
I like Simpson but worried he will be rested more often.
Thoughts?
Simpson is a machine I doubt he will be rested
I'm going Docherty though to save a little $$
8 of the last 10 seasons, Simmo has played every game, and has missed a total of 5 of 220 games! Usually selected because he is extremely durable and consistent, and even though he's older, will more than likely play every game barring injury/suspension
Joey or Dahl?
Quote from: Vinny on May 22, 2016, 12:18:47 AM
Joey or Dahl?
I'd go Dahl mate but Joey for this week may take the chocolates.
Btw let's hope Real win the CL next week :)
Who out of these 3 this week:
Priddis $502k (BE 66)
Gray $514k (BE 135)
Parker $554 (BE 137)
More concerned about who will score most for rest of the year.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 23, 2016, 10:34:31 PM
Who out of these 3 this week:
Priddis $502k (BE 66)
Gray $514k (BE 135)
Parker $554 (BE 137)
More concerned about who will score most for rest of the year.
Gray at that price.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on May 23, 2016, 10:34:31 PM
Who out of these 3 this week:
Priddis $502k (BE 66)
Gray $514k (BE 135)
Parker $554 (BE 137)
More concerned about who will score most for rest of the year.
Priddis.
Neale v Coniglio
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio
Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.
I just can't split the 3 of them
Quote from: jfitty on May 23, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio
Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.
I just can't split the 3 of them
Look at byes and price... and then realise Coniglio is still super unique and won't cop a tag. So go Conigs.
Rance vs Boyd?
Quote from: LaHug on May 23, 2016, 11:14:51 PM
Quote from: jfitty on May 23, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio
Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.
I just can't split the 3 of them
Look at byes and price... and then realise Coniglio is still super unique and won't cop a tag. So go Conigs.
Think I'm leaning towards Coniglio anyway... With Mundy being out Neale could cop more attention!
Quote from: dmac07 on May 23, 2016, 11:34:55 PM
Rance vs Boyd?
Rance still has cash to lose... Boyd right now, Rance in a week or two
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:45:47 PM
Quote from: LaHug on May 23, 2016, 11:14:51 PM
Quote from: jfitty on May 23, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio
Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.
I just can't split the 3 of them
Look at byes and price... and then realise Coniglio is still super unique and won't cop a tag. So go Conigs.
Think I'm leaning towards Coniglio anyway... With Mundy being out Neale could cop more attention!
Quote from: dmac07 on May 23, 2016, 11:34:55 PM
Rance vs Boyd?
Rance still has cash to lose... Boyd right now, Rance in a week or two
Is Mundy a certain to miss?
Hopper or Williams.
Williams likely to retain his spot even with 4 dogs defenders coming back. Looks fairly secure.
Quote from: muggle25 on May 24, 2016, 07:23:17 PM
Hopper or Williams.
Williams likely to retain his spot even with 4 dogs defenders coming back. Looks fairly secure.
I like Williams.... I reckon Hopper is too expensive for someone who I think will average around 70odd... Versus Matheison whose 80k less averaging 60odd
:-\
Never ever thought I'd be asking this one, BUT
J McVeigh V J Howe
Please guys and gals try not to choke laughing but I'm really leaning toward Howe. Howe is averaging 115% on his last 3 and will jump close to 500k after this week whilst McVeigh is still on a slide. All going well with selection guillotine night this week I need 1 of these 2 ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on May 25, 2016, 12:06:33 AM
:-\
Never ever thought I'd be asking this one, BUT
J McVeigh V J Howe
Please guys and gals try not to choke laughing but I'm really leaning toward Howe. Howe is averaging 115% on his last 3 and will jump close to 500k after this week whilst McVeigh is still on a slide. All going well with selection guillotine night this week I need 1 of these 2 ;)
McVeigh still has some way to drop, hold fire until he does something. As for Howe, don't get sucked in, has never been SC relevant.
Quote from: Bully on May 25, 2016, 12:16:45 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on May 25, 2016, 12:06:33 AM
:-\
Never ever thought I'd be asking this one, BUT
J McVeigh V J Howe
Please guys and gals try not to choke laughing but I'm really leaning toward Howe. Howe is averaging 115% on his last 3 and will jump close to 500k after this week whilst McVeigh is still on a slide. All going well with selection guillotine night this week I need 1 of these 2 ;)
Thanks mate, didn't really want to risk trading Williams in, needed to in order to trade this week. Was going to wait for Mathieson to Josh Smith but Smith could make more $ yet. Interested to see how close Melbourne are to naming Trengove. Cheers mate. ;)
McVeigh still has some way to drop, hold fire until he does something. As for Howe, don't get sucked in, has never been SC relevant.
Quote from: LaHug on May 23, 2016, 11:14:51 PM
Quote from: jfitty on May 23, 2016, 11:11:54 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 23, 2016, 11:11:14 PM
Neale v Coniglio
Trying to decide between these two and Ward.. So I'll piggy back on here.
I just can't split the 3 of them
Look at byes and price... and then realise Coniglio is still super unique and won't cop a tag. So go Conigs.
Ward is cheaper, averaging more and has better history than the other two... Am I missing something here? Ward is also only in 10% of teams, meaning he is a relative POD as well. The way I look at it usually is to decide what I expected from each player before the season, and allow slight adjustments up or down. Can Coniglio maintain a 110+ average whilst playing a tagging/negating role every other week? I doubt it.
For me it's:
Ward >Neale > daylight > Coniglio
dbj to williams, menadue to matho or bennedy to hopper? need the cash to go stef to goldie!
Gray v Priddis :-\
Quote from: Sydney14 on May 26, 2016, 08:31:46 PM
Gray v Priddis :-\
Tough one...toss of a coin long term, but Priddis this week, Gray the next.
Bennedy and Rance vs Priddis and Brown.
Quote from: tommy10 on May 26, 2016, 10:44:02 PM
Quote from: Sydney14 on May 26, 2016, 08:31:46 PM
Gray v Priddis :-\
Tough one...toss of a coin long term, but Priddis this week, Gray the next.
Bennedy and Rance vs Priddis and Brown.
Forgot to mention for the Priddis and Brown combo I'll have 92k vs 32k. Thinking next week's trades with Matheison to downgrade but may not have enough for Rance.
Docherty V Rance v Priddis
If i trade this week it has to be Doc before he gets out of reach
DBJ > Doc
Davis > Matherson a week early
Or wait next week and go
DJB(will loses some cash) > Rance (will lose cash)
Macpherson > Matherson
17 trades 177k in kitty
I'd wait a week mate.
Zac Williams or Howe?
Quote from: no eye deer on May 27, 2016, 03:39:49 PM
I'd wait a week mate.
Zac Williams or Howe?
Cheers for the advice, I am leaning towards not trading...
Quote from: no eye deer on May 27, 2016, 03:39:49 PM
I'd wait a week mate.
Zac Williams or Howe?
Definitely Williams. Think he'll be the safer pick
Boyd vs Rance?
Quote from: Jay on May 27, 2016, 04:13:15 PM
Boyd vs Rance?
Rance I reckon. Boyd will surely get tested at some stage you'd think...
Quote from: Jay on May 27, 2016, 04:13:15 PM
Boyd vs Rance?
Boyd. Scores since JJ and Bob went down; 121, 125, 124 and 109. Has had his rest via suspension. Chances of getting a rest are lower considering the long-term injuries the Dogs have already got, and they may be playing for an important position towards the end of the season; home ground advantage, making the 4 or even making the 8.
Also flower Rance and his bullshower SC scores
Hannebery and Williams (field DBJ & Adams)
vs.
Boyd and Hopper (field Hopper, only one of DBJ/Adams)
Quote from: LaHug on May 27, 2016, 06:14:06 PM
Hannebery and Williams (field DBJ & Adams)
vs.
Boyd and Hopper (field Hopper, only one of DBJ/Adams)
Williams dropped, so the second one easily
Quote from: LaHug on May 27, 2016, 06:14:06 PM
Hannebery and Williams (field DBJ & Adams)
vs.
Boyd and Hopper (field Hopper, only one of DBJ/Adams)
Boyd and Hopper due to Williams being dropped.
Paine vs Howard and Zorko vs Dalhaus
Howard vs Hopper vs Dunkley?
Quote from: fanTCfool on May 27, 2016, 08:10:19 PM
Howard vs Hopper vs Dunkley?
Has to be Hopper, surely
Paine vs Willis :-X
Really struggling with this one:
Dahlhaus vs Deledio
Quote from: My Chumps on May 27, 2016, 05:18:40 PM
Quote from: Jay on May 27, 2016, 04:13:15 PM
Boyd vs Rance?
Boyd. Scores since JJ and Bob went down; 121, 125, 124 and 109. Has had his rest via suspension. Chances of getting a rest are lower considering the long-term injuries the Dogs have already got, and they may be playing for an important position towards the end of the season; home ground advantage, making the 4 or even making the 8.
Also flower Rance and his bullshower SC scores
+1 especially the part about rance bullshower sc scores!!!!!!!
Gray vs Dahlhaus for M8
Gray would be my permanent M8 while Dahl would be a temp M8 as I would eventually swing him forward.
Quote from: Judd Magic on May 30, 2016, 08:11:30 PM
Gray vs Dahlhaus for M8
Gray would be my permanent M8 while Dahl would be a temp M8 as I would eventually swing him forward.
Gray with a low be of 73
Quote from: Marcon on May 30, 2016, 12:43:39 PM
Really struggling with this one:
Dahlhaus vs Deledio
Same here, anyone got any thoughts on this one?
Quote from: Raiden on May 30, 2016, 08:16:30 PM
Quote from: Marcon on May 30, 2016, 12:43:39 PM
Really struggling with this one:
Dahlhaus vs Deledio
Same here, anyone got any thoughts on this one?
Don't know why you'd look further than Dahl: 108 average, incredible low of 84.
Dahl + McViegh vs Gunston + Laird
Quote from: Marcon on May 30, 2016, 12:43:39 PM
Really struggling with this one:
Dahlhaus vs Deledio
Dahlhaus for me for sure.
'Winninger' team and DPP vs Ninth and a bit more fragile - 18 games in 2014, then 17 last year and only 5 so far this year I think. Yes he 'Had' been remarkable until end 2013 but he is getting older.
Quote from: Raiden on May 30, 2016, 08:16:30 PM
Quote from: Marcon on May 30, 2016, 12:43:39 PM
Really struggling with this one:
Dahlhaus vs Deledio
Same here, anyone got any thoughts on this one?
Dahl just.
Less risk of injury.
Quote from: My Chumps on May 30, 2016, 08:27:09 PM
Dahl + McViegh vs Gunston + Laird
Dahl/McVeigh, only due to the uncertainty of how Laird will perform on return, also may drop in price slightly.
Thanks guy's, Dahl it is!
Franklin v NRoo
Dahl - Dusty - Zorko or Wingard..
What order ?
Is Wingard worth saving $140k ?
Quote from: Mark on May 30, 2016, 09:02:43 PM
Dahl - Dusty - Zorko or Wingard..
What order ?
Is Wingard worth saving $140k ?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, Dahl, Dusty, Wingard
Quote from: GoLions on May 30, 2016, 09:06:29 PM
Quote from: Mark on May 30, 2016, 09:02:43 PM
Dahl - Dusty - Zorko or Wingard..
What order ?
Is Wingard worth saving $140k ?
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO, Dahl, Dusty, Wingard
Really have to stop giving you the chance to do that
Docherty v Rance v McVeigh
Ignoring breakevens, which 2 would you want in your side from this point on?
Quote from: MontyJnr on May 31, 2016, 02:11:09 PM
Docherty v Rance v McVeigh
Ignoring breakevens, which 2 would you want in your side from this point on?
Docherty and Rance
Quote from: tor01doc on May 31, 2016, 02:29:50 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on May 31, 2016, 02:11:09 PM
Docherty v Rance v McVeigh
Ignoring breakevens, which 2 would you want in your side from this point on?
Docherty and Rance
Quote from: Big Mac on May 31, 2016, 05:24:24 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on May 31, 2016, 02:29:50 PM
Quote from: MontyJnr on May 31, 2016, 02:11:09 PM
Docherty v Rance v McVeigh
Ignoring breakevens, which 2 would you want in your side from this point on?
Docherty and Rance
Not sure why you didn't just ask Rance vs McVeigh?
Tippett v Lycett ( both for ruck cover) v Franklin
Quote from: mzunguman on May 31, 2016, 08:13:57 PM
Tippett v Lycett ( both for ruck cover) v Franklin
Buddy >>> Tipp ~= Lycett
Buddy in career form. Just grab him. Do you have Currie or Cox for ruck cover? Because that should be enough.
Quote from: Bully on May 25, 2016, 12:16:45 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on May 25, 2016, 12:06:33 AM
:-\
Never ever thought I'd be asking this one, BUT
J McVeigh V J Howe
Please guys and gals try not to choke laughing but I'm really leaning toward Howe. Howe is averaging 115% on his last 3 and will jump close to 500k after this week whilst McVeigh is still on a slide. All going well with selection guillotine night this week I need 1 of these 2 ;)
McVeigh still has some way to drop, hold fire until he does something. As for Howe, don't get sucked in, has never been SC relevant.
Please refer to http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/pu-kangaroos--jarrad-waite
Quote from: LaHug on May 31, 2016, 08:35:24 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on May 31, 2016, 08:13:57 PM
Tippett v Lycett ( both for ruck cover) v Franklin
Buddy >>> Tipp ~= Lycett
Buddy in career form. Just grab him. Do you have Currie or Cox for ruck cover? Because that should be enough.
Only have Grimley who doesn't look a chance! Think I'll end up taking my chances and get buddy in
Quote from: TurtlesTeam on May 31, 2016, 09:03:19 PM
Quote from: Bully on May 25, 2016, 12:16:45 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on May 25, 2016, 12:06:33 AM
:-\
Never ever thought I'd be asking this one, BUT
J McVeigh V J Howe
Please guys and gals try not to choke laughing but I'm really leaning toward Howe. Howe is averaging 115% on his last 3 and will jump close to 500k after this week whilst McVeigh is still on a slide. All going well with selection guillotine night this week I need 1 of these 2 ;)
McVeigh still has some way to drop, hold fire until he does something. As for Howe, don't get sucked in, has never been SC relevant.
Please refer to http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/pu-kangaroos--jarrad-waite
Haha! I like it! A good way to knock some sense into those thinking of taking the risk with Howe.
Quote from: no eye deer on May 31, 2016, 09:32:53 PM
Haha! I like it! A good way to knock some sense into those thinking of taking the risk with Howe.
There's a big difference between a key position forward and a rebounding defender who gets all his points kicking the footy (Heater, Docherty style).
I'm not convinced he can keep it up. But I see the same things I saw a month ago when I brought in Docherty at $475k.
Howe at $495k certainly isn't the worst way to spend your money. I've toyed with the idea of bringing him in this week. Only thing stopping me is I don't think he's as good a 1on1 player as Dochers and may not have a good enough basement score when rebounding dries up.
Quote from: batt on May 31, 2016, 09:49:09 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on May 31, 2016, 09:32:53 PM
Haha! I like it! A good way to knock some sense into those thinking of taking the risk with Howe.
There's a big difference between a key position forward and a rebounding defender who gets all his points kicking the footy (Heater, Docherty style).
I'm not convinced he can keep it up. But I see the same things I saw a month ago when I brought in Docherty at $475k.
Howe at $495k certainly isn't the worst way to spend your money. I've toyed with the idea of bringing him in this week. Only thing stopping me is I don't think he's as good a 1on1 player as Dochers and may not have a good enough basement score when rebounding dries up.
I must admit, I did like his game last week. Maybe I'm a little bitter after bringing in Zac Williams instead last week and watching Howe go large. :P
Dusty - Zorko or Dahl plz guys...
Is Zorko worth the extra $$, Dusty looks like a new star with his new role, Dahl super cheap ???
Quote from: Mark on May 31, 2016, 10:02:45 PM
Dusty - Zorko or Dahl plz guys...
Is Zorko worth the extra $$, Dusty looks like a new star with his new role, Dahl super cheap ???
Awaits GoLions........
Quote from: Mark on May 31, 2016, 10:02:45 PM
Dusty - Zorko or Dahl plz guys...
Is Zorko worth the extra $$, Dusty looks like a new star with his new role, Dahl super cheap ???
How many spots have you got to fill? I would want at least two of them. Maybe Dusty and Dahl, Dahl super consistent and Dusty looks prime and has a big ceiling. I got Zorko a few weeks ago when he was cheaper, but not sure he will average much more than the other two from here on in. Hard call though. Inches in it!
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 31, 2016, 10:33:52 PM
Quote from: Mark on May 31, 2016, 10:02:45 PM
Dusty - Zorko or Dahl plz guys...
Is Zorko worth the extra $$, Dusty looks like a new star with his new role, Dahl super cheap ???
Awaits GoLions........
DUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSTYYYYYYYYYYY??
Quote from: Rusty00 on May 31, 2016, 10:33:52 PM
Quote from: Mark on May 31, 2016, 10:02:45 PM
Dusty - Zorko or Dahl plz guys...
Is Zorko worth the extra $$, Dusty looks like a new star with his new role, Dahl super cheap ???
Awaits GoLions........
Hahaha, he asked on the previous page and I already answered ;)
Quote from: Mark on May 31, 2016, 10:02:45 PM
Dusty - Zorko or Dahl plz guys...
Is Zorko worth the extra $$, Dusty looks like a new star with his new role, Dahl super cheap ???
Dusty - has the better draw and is in amazing touch.
Dahl is a gun but has a toughish draw coming up.
Zorko is maxed out in price. I'd wait for him to have a down game and drop in price.
Sidebottom vs Parker vs Gibbs vs Coniglio vs Ward vs JPK vs Cotchin
Quote from: Jay on June 01, 2016, 12:11:47 PM
Sidebottom vs Parker vs Gibbs vs Coniglio vs Ward vs JPK vs Cotchin
I like JPK out of these based on current form, also a proven premium. Gibbs/Coniglio bit highly priced - If you wait a further week Parker/Ward will be even better value.
Quote from: Jay on June 01, 2016, 12:11:47 PM
Sidebottom vs Parker vs Gibbs vs Coniglio vs Ward vs JPK vs Cotchin
D.Sheil?
Mitchel v Gray?
Quote from: Raiden on June 01, 2016, 12:48:09 PM
Quote from: Jay on June 01, 2016, 12:11:47 PM
Sidebottom vs Parker vs Gibbs vs Coniglio vs Ward vs JPK vs Cotchin
I like JPK out of these based on current form, also a proven premium. Gibbs/Coniglio bit highly priced - If you wait a further week Parker/Ward will be even better value.
If you honestly can't split them I'd go Gibbs on the strength of Carlton's draw for the last 4 Rds, the SC finals. ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on June 01, 2016, 05:51:50 PM
Quote from: Raiden on June 01, 2016, 12:48:09 PM
Quote from: Jay on June 01, 2016, 12:11:47 PM
Sidebottom vs Parker vs Gibbs vs Coniglio vs Ward vs JPK vs Cotchin
I like JPK out of these based on current form, also a proven premium. Gibbs/Coniglio bit highly priced - If you wait a further week Parker/Ward will be even better value.
If you honestly can't split them I'd go Gibbs on the strength of Carlton's draw for the last 4 Rds, the SC finals. ;)
I can't split them at all.. Was leaning towards Sidebum :-X Just looking for whoever will score the most from here on out. Gibbs is very tempting, he seems to be unleashed under Bolton.
Dalhaus, Gray, Sheil, Ward or Tom Mitchrll, had Gray for 2 weekx burnt me
Quote from: whynot102 on June 01, 2016, 06:32:53 PM
Dalhaus or Gray
This week, Gray. Has bottomed out and is every chance of averaging 110+ from now on. Dahl might go down in price a bit more.
I've brought Gary into my AF side, but thinking twice as seems like Pies are his least favourite team to play! ???
Tippa vs Adams
Keep 1 trade 1
Quote from: Big Mac on June 01, 2016, 11:08:15 PM
Tippa vs Adams
Keep 1 trade 1
Do you have to trade 1? Haha :P
Probably hold Adams, but I'd try to keep 1 fwd and 1 back if possible
Quote from: GoLions on June 01, 2016, 11:15:00 PM
Quote from: Big Mac on June 01, 2016, 11:08:15 PM
Tippa vs Adams
Keep 1 trade 1
Do you have to trade 1? Haha :P
Probably hold Adams, but I'd try to keep 1 fwd and 1 back if possible
Didn't even realise but yeh I can keep both actually, a bit stupid of me :P
haha nvm then, will probably be asking the same question next week though
J.Smith and McVeigh
vs
R.Gray and Brown
Quote from: Huttabito on June 02, 2016, 01:29:38 AM
J.Smith and McVeigh
vs
R.Gray and Brown
I'd go #1 as I think they have more upside together, but really depends on your structure this one.
Boyd vs Rance?
Not too worried about the $, but more the average from here.
Like Boyd, but with JJ due back after the byes...?
Quote from: js19 on June 02, 2016, 03:53:11 AM
Boyd vs Rance?
Not too worried about the $, but more the average from here.
Like Boyd, but with JJ due back after the byes...?
Rance.
Boyd has only scored well once Murphy and JJ went down. Add to that Suckling is back.
This means he's probably missing 5-10 handball receives per game which is 20-30 pts per game..
In my opinion JJ will outscore Boyd in the run home
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Ha! Beat me too it. The question everyone will be asking. I might take the punt on Tucker. I'm sick of low scoring rookies and I reckon he will score more than Collins. Just need him to hold his spot through the byes.
Quote from: no eye deer on June 02, 2016, 07:32:38 PM
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Ha! Beat me too it. The question everyone will be asking. I might take the punt on Tucker. I'm sick of low scoring rookies and I reckon he will score more than Collins. Just need him to hold his spot through the byes.
Probably grab Collins this week and pass on Tucker as i think Collins should have safer JS. Was considering grabbing both but seems too risky with two freo rookies in the backline.
Quote from: steven3 on June 02, 2016, 07:37:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on June 02, 2016, 07:32:38 PM
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Ha! Beat me too it. The question everyone will be asking. I might take the punt on Tucker. I'm sick of low scoring rookies and I reckon he will score more than Collins. Just need him to hold his spot through the byes.
Probably grab Collins this week and pass on Tucker as i think Collins should have safer JS. Was considering grabbing both but seems too risky with two freo rookies in the backline.
Wanna laugh??
I have Sheridan at D6....that would be 3 Freo players in DEF :-[ :-[ :-[
Tom Mitchell v Gray v Priddis??
With Hannberry will be my last Mid Premo post byes....
Quote from: reenergised on June 02, 2016, 08:03:50 PM
Tom Mitchell v Gray v Priddis??
With Hannberry will be my last Mid Premo post byes....
He's back!
Plus I have Titch and after he tagged Smitch successfully 2 weeks ago I fear that he may be asked to tag in some of the coming games, ensuring he scores poorly.
Priddis is also good but may get a rest.
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:50:10 PM
Quote from: steven3 on June 02, 2016, 07:37:25 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on June 02, 2016, 07:32:38 PM
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Ha! Beat me too it. The question everyone will be asking. I might take the punt on Tucker. I'm sick of low scoring rookies and I reckon he will score more than Collins. Just need him to hold his spot through the byes.
Probably grab Collins this week and pass on Tucker as i think Collins should have safer JS. Was considering grabbing both but seems too risky with two freo rookies in the backline.
Wanna laugh??
I have Sheridan at D6....that would be 3 Freo players in DEF :-[ :-[ :-[
Going Tucker just to be different.
Jackson Paine v Sam Collins (a week early)
Who has the best JS out of the two and who do people think will generate the most $$$$?
Need to bring in a rookie this week and looking at Paine over Collins, I brought in Darcy Tucker a week early only for him to be dropped till now... Scared the same thing will happen with Collins,
Neither are going to make heaaaaaps of cash but dunno leaning towards Paine I like that he's playing as a pure defender rather than a forward think that will help his point scoring a lot more
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Just following this... I know collins will play key defender... What's tuckers role??
Quote from: mzunguman on June 02, 2016, 08:42:40 PM
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Just following this... I know collins will play key defender... What's tuckers role??
not exactly sure. collins may have better JS because he is KPP
Quote from: mzunguman on June 02, 2016, 08:42:40 PM
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Just following this... I know collins will play key defender... What's tuckers role??
Should play smaller defender. Played mid for Peel and had 29 touches last week, which earned him the recall, so can find the pill
Quote from: js19 on June 02, 2016, 08:47:44 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on June 02, 2016, 08:42:40 PM
Quote from: Asparagus on June 02, 2016, 07:27:14 PM
Tucker (Freo DEF) Vs Collins (Freo DEF)
Just following this... I know collins will play key defender... What's tuckers role??
Should play smaller defender. Played mid for Peel and had 29 touches last week, which earned him the recall, so can find the pill
i dont like tucker. i mean, who is he coming in for?
at least with collins - apearce went down for the season, ibbo is still 2-4 weeks away and johson is still TBA. bodes well for his JS being a KPP and all.
Dougal Howard or Jackson Paine?
Samuel Collins or tucker please who's better
Thanks
hopper vs smith
Quote from: timtim on June 02, 2016, 09:19:42 PM
Dougal Howard or Jackson Paine?
Neither? Paine if you have to....
Quote from: mark44 on June 03, 2016, 10:50:41 AM
Samuel Collins or tucker please who's better
Thanks
I'm Taking Collins :)
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 03, 2016, 12:00:38 PM
hopper vs smith
Smith for me... consistent for around a ~70
Motagna V Deledio V Franklin
Lids
Quote from: mzunguman on June 03, 2016, 12:13:18 PM
Quote from: timtim on June 02, 2016, 09:19:42 PM
Dougal Howard or Jackson Paine?
Neither? Paine if you have to....
Quote from: mark44 on June 03, 2016, 10:50:41 AM
Samuel Collins or tucker please who's better
Thanks
I'm Taking Collins :)
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 03, 2016, 12:00:38 PM
hopper vs smith
Smith for me... consistent for around a ~70
Motagna V Deledio V Franklin
Robbie Gray ($503k) v. Jack Steven ($542k) vs. Montagna ($531k) vs. Wingard ($415k)?
Quote from: BLBBLB on June 03, 2016, 02:46:38 PM
Robbie Gray ($503k) v. Jack Steven ($542k) vs. Montagna ($531k) vs. Wingard ($415k)?
Robbie. Two tons in a row suggests he's back to his best.
Who is the best option?? Interested to hear, I had tippett locked in for if goldy was out, now I'm 50/50
Same decision, leaning towards Tippett as Lycett has the Doggies this week, who rucks have struggled against.
Having said that, Lycett has scored a considerable amount from goals.
Just go with whoever I don't pick 8)
I'm leaning tippett as he is most established as a player and more proven... But it's close
Robbie Gray or Matt Priddis
New week new problem!
Ward vs Priddis vs TMitch :)
Quote from: Maca24 on June 06, 2016, 05:48:09 PM
New week new problem!
Ward vs Priddis vs TMitch :)
Ward
Quote from: GoLions on June 06, 2016, 05:54:13 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on June 06, 2016, 05:48:09 PM
New week new problem!
Ward vs Priddis vs TMitch :)
Ward
Agree but does a ridiculously low BE change your choice?
Quote from: tor01doc on June 06, 2016, 05:59:42 PM
Quote from: GoLions on June 06, 2016, 05:54:13 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on June 06, 2016, 05:48:09 PM
New week new problem!
Ward vs Priddis vs TMitch :)
Ward
Agree but does a ridiculously low BE change your choice?
Think I like Ward more.
Has a nice draw coming up and is probably more consistent that TMitch and Priddis.
suckers vs hall
too sideways? or worth a punt?
R.Gray Vs Sloane?
pendles vs treloar+70k ( after their byes)
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 06, 2016, 07:56:29 PM
suckers vs hall
too sideways? or worth a punt?
Nar, sideways kinda trade.
Quote from: tttt on June 08, 2016, 01:33:49 AM
pendles vs treloar+70k ( after their byes)
Pendles, also can be used a Capt.
Quote from: Raiden on June 08, 2016, 11:14:48 AM
Quote from: tttt on June 08, 2016, 01:33:49 AM
pendles vs treloar+70k ( after their byes)
Pendles, also can be used a Capt.
Well, Treloar can also be used as a VC as he can have some massive games as well (love having him in DT and AF). But, I agree Pendles is the better choice, and safe for the C if your VC fails.
Quote from: Ingram on June 08, 2016, 01:29:54 AM
R.Gray Vs Sloane?
hmm iv got Gray
But Adelaide have the better run home...
Ports first half of the year was meant to be their easier one.
Id actually take Sloane of those 2
But bugger them both and take Bontempelli! i was looking and him after his 2nd 30 disposal game
he is in amazing form and a further 3 games later i wish i had backed myself in! 147,112,112,78,149 over the last 5
He is going to average top premo numbers from here..you will thank me at the end if u chose bont over those two.
Wingard vs suckling
Pittard vs McVeigh?
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 08, 2016, 05:22:06 PM
Wingard vs suckling
Wingard has a better history & higher scoring potential.
He was a bargain at 380k-415k, at 460k is so/so now
Wait a bit and get Montagna for around 460-480k
Quote from: jfitty on June 08, 2016, 07:04:52 PM
Pittard vs McVeigh?
Probably McVeigh, but Pittard has been looking pretty good lately without doing anything amazing, so could be a good POD
Rocky v Merret
Rocky has risk and I am low on trades
Merret has DPP
Can do BK for either
Quote from: Asparagus on June 08, 2016, 08:12:09 PM
Rocky v Merret
Rocky has risk and I am low on trades
Merret has DPP
Can do BK for either
I have avoided Zerret for the reason that I feel Essendon will eventually crash and burn and surely he can't keep scoring 100+ when the bombers are belted each week.
I think Rocky has a huge upside and will out score Zerret. Go Rock Dog - take the punt
Lee (provided he's named) vs Austin.
Need a cheap defender to downgrade to (already have Collins)
Pretty sure that essendon have already crashed and burnt... It has shown in poor teams in the past that the guns still score well. Gaz at GC, Ward at GWS his first year he was averaging 120 fir most if the year, Zorko this year I at Brisbane.
In saying that I'd go Rocky over Zerrett.
As for Lee v Austin I'd say neither. Lee is an absolute spud, there is a reason why st kilda haven't played him much this year despite their injuries and Austin has pretty low JS
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on June 08, 2016, 10:47:06 PM
Quote from: Asparagus on June 08, 2016, 08:12:09 PM
Rocky v Merret
Rocky has risk and I am low on trades
Merret has DPP
Can do BK for either
I have avoided Zerret for the reason that I feel Essendon will eventually crash and burn and surely he can't keep scoring 100+ when the bombers are belted each week.
I think Rocky has a huge upside and will out score Zerret. Go Rock Dog - take the punt
Rocky will outscore Merrett, no question.
Merrett has been dominating despite Essendon getting pumped and will continue to do so. Id be surprised to see his aberage fluctuate much from where it is.
Quote from: King_Robbo on June 08, 2016, 11:41:56 PM
Pretty sure that essendon have already crashed and burnt... It has shown in poor teams in the past that the guns still score well. Gaz at GC, Ward at GWS his first year he was averaging 120 fir most if the year, Zorko this year I at Brisbane.
In saying that I'd go Rocky over Zerrett.
As for Lee v Austin I'd say neither. Lee is an absolute spud, there is a reason why st kilda haven't played him much this year despite their injuries and Austin has pretty low JS
Lee might not be the greatest player going around but he is a legit downgrade option this week if selected.
Goddard, Fisher, Dempster all out injured for long periods means Lee has decent JS for at least 4-6 weeks I reckon which is all I really need from him.
Quote from: King_Robbo on June 08, 2016, 11:41:56 PM
Pretty sure that essendon have already crashed and burnt... It has shown in poor teams in the past that the guns still score well. Gaz at GC, Ward at GWS his first year he was averaging 120 fir most if the year, Zorko this year I at Brisbane.
In saying that I'd go Rocky over Zerrett.
As for Lee v Austin I'd say neither. Lee is an absolute spud, there is a reason why st kilda haven't played him much this year despite their injuries and Austin has pretty low JS
I fear there is more crashing to come.
Picture 2nd half of the season when the bombers are still losing heavily, these 'top players' are sore and frustrated, plus they know that despite how much effort they put in they will not be there next season. They'll be head nicked and subsequently I think Essendon will be looking at some absolute beltings.
I may be wrong, and it may be a situation like the movie Major League where some misfits and washed up baseball hacks come together form a strong team and take out the championship, but I doubt it. Tippa, Kelly, Brown and Crowley aren't quite Wesley Snipes, Corbin Bernsen, Tom Berenger and Charlie Sheen.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on June 09, 2016, 06:45:14 AM
Quote from: King_Robbo on June 08, 2016, 11:41:56 PM
Pretty sure that essendon have already crashed and burnt... It has shown in poor teams in the past that the guns still score well. Gaz at GC, Ward at GWS his first year he was averaging 120 fir most if the year, Zorko this year I at Brisbane.
In saying that I'd go Rocky over Zerrett.
As for Lee v Austin I'd say neither. Lee is an absolute spud, there is a reason why st kilda haven't played him much this year despite their injuries and Austin has pretty low JS
I fear there is more crashing to come.
Picture 2nd half of the season when the bombers are still losing heavily, these 'top players' are sore and frustrated, plus they know that despite how much effort they put in they will not be there next season. They'll be head nicked and subsequently I think Essendon will be looking at some absolute beltings.
I may be wrong, and it may be a situation like the movie Major League where some misfits and washed up baseball hacks come together form a strong team and take out the championship, but I doubt it. Tippa, Kelly, Brown and Crowley aren't quite Wesley Snipes, Corbin Bernsen, Tom Berenger and Charlie Sheen.
Haha nice reference!
I kind of agree, they'll tapper off especially those older guys like Kelly, Crowley, Stokes etc. however I can see Zerrett still banging out 100s. The kid is a machine, won't get tagged (why would a team tag when they will win anyway) and I think he can only improve his scoring as his d/e has been pretty average. If he cleaned that up he'd be a lock. In saying that, I don't think he will so I'll be steering clear.
Let's put it this way though, if it came down to Zerrett v Montagna for my f6 I'll take Zerrett all day everyday
Quote from: King_Robbo on June 09, 2016, 07:15:32 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on June 09, 2016, 06:45:14 AM
Quote from: King_Robbo on June 08, 2016, 11:41:56 PM
Pretty sure that essendon have already crashed and burnt... It has shown in poor teams in the past that the guns still score well. Gaz at GC, Ward at GWS his first year he was averaging 120 fir most if the year, Zorko this year I at Brisbane.
In saying that I'd go Rocky over Zerrett.
As for Lee v Austin I'd say neither. Lee is an absolute spud, there is a reason why st kilda haven't played him much this year despite their injuries and Austin has pretty low JS
I fear there is more crashing to come.
Picture 2nd half of the season when the bombers are still losing heavily, these 'top players' are sore and frustrated, plus they know that despite how much effort they put in they will not be there next season. They'll be head nicked and subsequently I think Essendon will be looking at some absolute beltings.
I may be wrong, and it may be a situation like the movie Major League where some misfits and washed up baseball hacks come together form a strong team and take out the championship, but I doubt it. Tippa, Kelly, Brown and Crowley aren't quite Wesley Snipes, Corbin Bernsen, Tom Berenger and Charlie Sheen.
Haha nice reference!
I kind of agree, they'll tapper off especially those older guys like Kelly, Crowley, Stokes etc. however I can see Zerrett still banging out 100s. The kid is a machine, won't get tagged (why would a team tag when they will win anyway) and I think he can only improve his scoring as his d/e has been pretty average. If he cleaned that up he'd be a lock. In saying that, I don't think he will so I'll be steering clear.
Let's put it this way though, if it came down to Zerrett v Montagna for my f6 I'll take Zerrett all day everyday
Yeah, Zerret has been very consistent I'll give him that. And having picked up Montagna a few weeks ago thinking he'd bottomed out, I am now wishing I'd gone someone else!
Suckling vs Laird
Who avg more from here? Suckling is just under 400k. Great value if he can avg 90+
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 09, 2016, 11:19:24 AM
Suckling vs Laird
Who avg more from here? Suckling is just under 400k. Great value if he can avg 90+
Laird will probably average slightly higher (haven't looked at draws so happy to be corrected) but Suckers is great value. I can't bring myself to trade him back in after dropping him when he was injured. Should've just held on and played rookies
Quote from: LaHug on June 09, 2016, 11:22:17 AM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 09, 2016, 11:19:24 AM
Suckling vs Laird
Who avg more from here? Suckling is just under 400k. Great value if he can avg 90+
Laird will probably average slightly higher (haven't looked at draws so happy to be corrected) but Suckers is great value. I can't bring myself to trade him back in after dropping him when he was injured. Should've just held on and played rookies
Pretty sure crows have the favorable draw over the dogs. But suckling is a good POD. Worried about the return of JJ though.
Laird should bottom out at about 450-460 and with their draw that's enticing.
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 09, 2016, 11:25:41 AM
Quote from: LaHug on June 09, 2016, 11:22:17 AM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 09, 2016, 11:19:24 AM
Suckling vs Laird
Who avg more from here? Suckling is just under 400k. Great value if he can avg 90+
Laird will probably average slightly higher (haven't looked at draws so happy to be corrected) but Suckers is great value. I can't bring myself to trade him back in after dropping him when he was injured. Should've just held on and played rookies
Pretty sure crows have the favorable draw over the dogs. But suckling is a good POD. Worried about the return of JJ though.
Laird should bottom out at about 450-460 and with their draw that's enticing.
Laird - just
I think they'll average similar in the remaining 11 games and I do think that the dogs are a better team and do share the ball around more in defense (i.e. We play keepings off) however I'm going Laird because he fits my bye structure perfectly
ward v gray v selwood v rocky
Buddy vs ZMerret to finish my fwds
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on June 08, 2016, 10:48:11 PM
Lee (provided he's named) vs Austin.
Need a cheap defender to downgrade to (already have Collins)
Tucker?
Quote from: Asparagus on June 09, 2016, 04:17:07 PM
Buddy vs ZMerret to finish my fwds
I reckon Merrett, they should average roughly the same, but he's more of a POD.
Quote from: Asparagus on June 09, 2016, 04:21:04 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on June 08, 2016, 10:48:11 PM
Lee (provided he's named) vs Austin.
Need a cheap defender to downgrade to (already have Collins)
Tucker?
Yep I reckon I'd go Tucker even after a price rise than those other 2
Philips (Coll) vs Reid (GWS)
Quote from: Jay on June 09, 2016, 08:04:20 PM
Philips (Coll) vs Reid (GWS)
Desperate times... Thinking the same thing
Gibson (hawks) vs Rance? :/
Quote from: mzunguman on June 09, 2016, 08:26:12 PM
Quote from: Jay on June 09, 2016, 08:04:20 PM
Philips (Coll) vs Reid (GWS)
Desperate times... Thinking the same thing
I originally thought Phillips, but now have changed my mind and gone Reid. GWS have basically no injuries, he's a confirmed starter, and has AFL experience.
Ward V Priddis?
Rance v. Laird?
Shiel vs sloane vs Ward
Quote from: backpocket on June 10, 2016, 12:04:34 AM
Shiel vs sloane vs Ward
Ward > Sloane (good run home) > Shiel
Selwood vs Neale vs Hannes taking into account $
Quote from: backpocket on June 10, 2016, 12:04:34 AM
Shiel vs sloane vs Ward
Sloane > Ward > Shiel
Not much at all between Ward and Shiel
Deledio Vs Montagna
Bringing in a mid this week.
Current mids: Danger, Pendles, Selwood, GAJ, Libba, Parker, Smith, Hopper
Can afford anyone. Should I go:
Neale
Hannebery (+$14k) or
Gray (+$105k)
Think Gray is great value or do I go one of the other two?
Neale!
Could you rank these?
Priddis V Ward V Merrett V Gibson V Simmo
Quote from: pikla on June 10, 2016, 03:46:53 PM
Bringing in a mid this week.
Current mids: Danger, Pendles, Selwood, GAJ, Libba, Parker, Smith, Hopper
Can afford anyone. Should I go:
Neale
Hannebery (+$14k) or
Gray (+$105k)
Hanners and Neale seem almost guaranteed to be top 8 mids.
Gray not as certain.
Get the best IMO
Think Gray is great value or do I go one of the other two?
Quote from: mzunguman on June 10, 2016, 03:53:58 PM
Neale!
Could you rank these?
Priddis V Ward V Merrett V Gibson V Simmo
Ward and Simpson
Quote from: tor01doc on June 10, 2016, 03:56:21 PM
Quote from: pikla on June 10, 2016, 03:46:53 PM
Bringing in a mid this week.
Current mids: Danger, Pendles, Selwood, GAJ, Libba, Parker, Smith, Hopper
Can afford anyone. Should I go:
Neale
Hannebery (+$14k) or
Gray (+$105k)
Hanners and Neale seem almost guaranteed to be top 8 mids.
Gray not as certain.
Get the best IMO
Think Gray is great value or do I go one of the other two?
[/quote
?
Quote from: pikla on June 10, 2016, 04:00:54 PM
Quote from: tor01doc on June 10, 2016, 03:56:21 PM
Quote from: pikla on June 10, 2016, 03:46:53 PM
Bringing in a mid this week.
Current mids: Danger, Pendles, Selwood, GAJ, Libba, Parker, Smith, Hopper
Can afford anyone. Should I go:
Neale
Hannebery (+$14k) or
Gray (+$105k)
Hanners and Neale seem almost guaranteed to be top 8 mids.
Gray not as certain.
Get the best IMO
Think Gray is great value or do I go one of the other two?
[/quote
?
I would go for the best.
Hanners and Neale almost guaranteed to be top 8 mids.
Gray not so IMO.
And don't tell me his average would be higher if he didn't spit the dummy because he did and may well again.
Also, Hanners only played 3 quarters round 1 and had a knock another round as well.
Neale gathering both momentum and possessions like mad.
Quote from: mzunguman on June 10, 2016, 03:53:58 PM
Neale!
Could you rank these?
Priddis V Ward V Merrett V Gibson V Simmo
Ward>Priddis>Merrett>Simmo>Gibson
Brown to Suckers for D6. Too sideways or good call? Thoughts?
Quote from: mzunguman on June 10, 2016, 03:53:58 PM
Neale!
Could you rank these?
Priddis V Ward V Merrett V Gibson V Simmo
Simmo because he is almost certainly a top 8 defender.
Merrett - top rated forward (with bonus of DPP)
Ward > Priddis > Gibson - not keen on these 3 tbh
Quote from: ivolve on June 10, 2016, 04:13:19 PM
Brown to Suckers for D6. Too sideways or good call? Thoughts?
Not sideways but don't expect anymore than a low 90's average from suckers i would think.
Gray vs Selwood
Duckwood for me
I actually like the fact that he is playing 13 and 14.
By round 15 I will have traded a few extra round 13 and 14 guys in thereby having 18 for sure.
Rocky +120k (and risk) or Neale?
Trade Hall or Tippa?
Quote from: Marcon on June 10, 2016, 06:56:02 PM
Trade Hall or Tippa?
What's best for your bye? 50/50 for me
Which combo in completed team?
Laird/Rance & Neale
vs
Boyd & Selwood/Rocky
Start smith or Davis or take dunkleys 59?
Quote from: backpocket on June 12, 2016, 11:03:53 AM
Start smith or Davis or take dunkleys 59?
Tigers are hard to score against so I'd go with Smith
Who to field?????
PETRACCA[/b]
OR
HOPPER
Quote from: Asparagus on June 12, 2016, 05:02:00 PM
Who to field?????
PETRACCA[/b]
OR
HOPPER
Hopefully you fielded Petracca over Hopper.
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 12, 2016, 10:16:25 PM
Quote from: Asparagus on June 12, 2016, 05:02:00 PM
Who to field?????
PETRACCA[/b]
OR
HOPPER
Yeah I did thanks.
Hopper now becomes another chopping block contender.
Hopefully you fielded Petracca over Hopper.
Quote from: jfitty on June 08, 2016, 07:04:52 PM
Pittard vs McVeigh?
expect mcv to get better now he has a few games in him plus dpp. also like pittard as option. comes down to cash and byes for me.
Smith or Trengrove on field ?
Quote from: crowls on June 13, 2016, 11:28:07 AM
Quote from: jfitty on June 08, 2016, 07:04:52 PM
Pittard vs McVeigh?
expect mcv to get better now he has a few games in him plus dpp. also like pittard as option. comes down to cash and byes for me.
Went Pittard and very pleased with that trade.
I feel like McVeigh just won't be the same player this year. I know he missed the preseason, but he looks slower and is spending more time up forward.
Pittard's in All Australian form so it made sense in the end.
Just planning out a few trades..
Gray vs Rockliff?
Forget byes and cost.. Who's the better pick rest of the season?
Hopefully then grab Neale when he drops and mids are done!
Quote from: jfitty on June 13, 2016, 10:50:05 PM
Just planning out a few trades..
Gray vs Rockliff?
Forget byes and cost.. Who's the better pick rest of the season?
Hopefully then grab Neale when he drops and mids are done!
I would take gray
Less risk and should average the same or more
Selwood vs Rockliff? :-\
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 14, 2016, 01:24:14 AM
Selwood vs Rockliff? :-\
Selwood for me
Pittard vs Bartel vs Boyd vs Gibson
Which order?
Quote from: steven3 on June 14, 2016, 10:31:03 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 14, 2016, 01:24:14 AM
Selwood vs Rockliff? :-\
Selwood for me
Pittard vs Bartel vs Boyd vs Gibson
Which order?
Bartel, Boyd, Gibson, Pittard.
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 14, 2016, 01:36:11 PM
Quote from: steven3 on June 14, 2016, 10:31:03 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 14, 2016, 01:24:14 AM
Selwood vs Rockliff? :-\
Selwood for me
Pittard vs Bartel vs Boyd vs Gibson
Which order?
Bartel, Boyd, Gibson, Pittard.
Boyd, Gibson, Bartel, Pittard for me.
Who to trade in:
Stewart vs Jansen vs Trengove
Quote from: Maca24 on June 14, 2016, 08:44:10 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 14, 2016, 01:36:11 PM
Quote from: steven3 on June 14, 2016, 10:31:03 AM
Quote from: Judd Magic on June 14, 2016, 01:24:14 AM
Selwood vs Rockliff? :-\
Selwood for me
Pittard vs Bartel vs Boyd vs Gibson
Which order?
Bartel, Boyd, Gibson, Pittard.
Boyd, Gibson, Bartel, Pittard for me.
Who to trade in:
Stewart vs Jansen vs Trengove
Cheers guys
Trengove for sure if you only need one. Wait on teams if you need another.
Looking at a POD to Gray/Rocky (ignore byes):
Bontempelli vs Sloane
Really keen to take a punt on Bont, looks in amazing form. Not sure what happened earlier this year when he wasn't scoring as well?
Otherwise I might play it safe and grab Gray or Rockliff.
Quote from: jfitty on June 14, 2016, 09:45:10 PM
Looking at a POD to Gray/Rocky (ignore byes):
Bontempelli vs Sloane
Really keen to take a punt on Bont, looks in amazing form. Not sure what happened earlier this year when he wasn't scoring as well?
Otherwise I might play it safe and grab Gray or Rockliff.
Go the Bont! Great POD, I really am looking at ways to get him in.
Quote from: Maca24 on June 15, 2016, 02:03:54 PM
Quote from: jfitty on June 14, 2016, 09:45:10 PM
Looking at a POD to Gray/Rocky (ignore byes):
Bontempelli vs Sloane
Really keen to take a punt on Bont, looks in amazing form. Not sure what happened earlier this year when he wasn't scoring as well?
Otherwise I might play it safe and grab Gray or Rockliff.
Go the Bont! Great POD, I really am looking at ways to get him in.
I could work him in, I think he'd be a really exciting player to own too, not just a great POD.
Just deciding if he's worth it over proven players like Gray and Rockliff
Quote from: jfitty on June 15, 2016, 03:06:33 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on June 15, 2016, 02:03:54 PM
Quote from: jfitty on June 14, 2016, 09:45:10 PM
Looking at a POD to Gray/Rocky (ignore byes):
Bontempelli vs Sloane
Really keen to take a punt on Bont, looks in amazing form. Not sure what happened earlier this year when he wasn't scoring as well?
Otherwise I might play it safe and grab Gray or Rockliff.
Go the Bont! Great POD, I really am looking at ways to get him in.
I could work him in, I think he'd be a really exciting player to own too, not just a great POD.
Just deciding if he's worth it over proven players like Gray and Rockliff
I flowering love the Bont.
Bont fever! I love The Bont too! I can get him or Ward, since I intend to get Neale when he bottoms out to finish my mids. So:
Ward v. The Bont?
Quote from: dylanclements on June 16, 2016, 03:02:36 PM
Bont fever! I love The Bont too! I can get him or Ward, since I intend to get Neale when he bottoms out to finish my mids. So:
Ward v. The Bont?
(http://sd.keepcalm-o-matic.co.uk/i/keep-calm-and-love-the-bont.png)
thoughts on going nicnat to mumford? already have gawn and goldy doesnt look 100% too me
(and yes i know mumford is injury prone :P)
Quote from: tttt on June 16, 2016, 03:28:56 PM
thoughts on going nicnat to mumford? already have gawn and goldy doesnt look 100% too me
(and yes i know mumford is injury prone :P)
I've got goldy and don't really want to fork out top dollar for Gawn who can still throw in some shockers! Mumford I'm definetly looking at, or if they finally drop West I'd consider Martin
Quote from: mzunguman on June 16, 2016, 03:32:19 PM
Quote from: tttt on June 16, 2016, 03:28:56 PM
thoughts on going nicnat to mumford? already have gawn and goldy doesnt look 100% too me
(and yes i know mumford is injury prone :P)
I've got goldy and don't really want to fork out top dollar for Gawn who can still throw in some shockers! Mumford I'm definetly looking at, or if they finally drop West I'd consider Martin
If you're not grabbing Goldy/Gawn, I'd heavily consider Sauce Jacobs
Quote from: GoLions on June 16, 2016, 03:34:26 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on June 16, 2016, 03:32:19 PM
Quote from: tttt on June 16, 2016, 03:28:56 PM
thoughts on going nicnat to mumford? already have gawn and goldy doesnt look 100% too me
(and yes i know mumford is injury prone :P)
I've got goldy and don't really want to fork out top dollar for Gawn who can still throw in some shockers! Mumford I'm definetly looking at, or if they finally drop West I'd consider Martin
If you're not grabbing Goldy/Gawn, I'd heavily consider Sauce Jacobs
yea narrowed it down jacobs, mumford,goldy and lycett
but lycett dropped this week so thats no good, really wanted to see how he'd perform as a sole ruck
jacobs and mummy are great value and both have very easy draws coming up
Yeah I'd be getting Jacobs of the two probably, he tends to get the ball a bit which helps. Then again, that's why I chose Stef over NN in the first place...
Quote from: GoLions on June 16, 2016, 03:34:26 PM
Quote from: mzunguman on June 16, 2016, 03:32:19 PM
Quote from: tttt on June 16, 2016, 03:28:56 PM
thoughts on going nicnat to mumford? already have gawn and goldy doesnt look 100% too me
(and yes i know mumford is injury prone :P)
I've got goldy and don't really want to fork out top dollar for Gawn who can still throw in some shockers! Mumford I'm definetly looking at, or if they finally drop West I'd consider Martin
If you're not grabbing Goldy/Gawn, I'd heavily consider Sauce Jacobs
Just grab the Bont and put him in the ruck
Zerrett vs Westhoff
Need a mid downgrade.
Trengove ($156k, 70 avg)
V
Kade Stewart ($102k, 80 avg)
Points and JS suggest Trengove, but the extra $50k could be handy.
Thoughts?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on June 16, 2016, 09:50:13 PM
Need a mid downgrade.
Trengove ($156k, 70 avg)
V
Kade Stewart ($102k, 80 avg)
Points and JS suggest Trengove, but the extra $50k could be handy.
Thoughts?
Trengove.
Paying the extra money for the JS is worth it IMO.
Rank these please
Steven + Neale + Selwood + Ward
Quote from: mzunguman on June 16, 2016, 11:12:08 PM
Rank these please
Steven + Neale + Selwood + Ward
Jelwood Ward Neale Steven
Funnily enough, would reverse that order for RDT
Quote from: mzunguman on June 16, 2016, 11:12:08 PM
Rank these please
Steven + Neale + Selwood + Ward
Selwood, Neale, Ward and Steven.
Not much between them though.
planning on grabbing 2.
Jelwood/Bont/Priddis/Ward
and Montagna or Lids
Tom Scully v Leigh Montagna
Quote from: Keeper27 on June 17, 2016, 08:23:16 AM
planning on grabbing 2.
Jelwood/Bont/Priddis/Ward
and Montagna or Lids
Go Ward and Bont. Everyones midfields are starting to look really similar, get a few gun PODs in.
And Montagna over Lids
Well I actually have 9 mids this week lol
Hopper vs trengrove vs Jansen
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 17, 2016, 06:50:48 PM
Well I actually have 9 mids this week lol
Hopper vs trengrove vs Jansen
Loophole Jansen.
Quote from: Bully on June 17, 2016, 07:06:33 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 17, 2016, 06:50:48 PM
Well I actually have 9 mids this week lol
Hopper vs trengrove vs Jansen
Loophole Jansen.
Good idea lol
Jansen or trengove
Trengove
Help!! - Do i sacrifice cash for points this week?
Option 1 - Smith/McPherson/Davis to Trengrove/Stewart/Jansen
or
Option 2 - Smith/Mcpherson/Nicnat to Trengrove/Stewart/Gawn
If option 1 then I pick up Gawn in 2 weeks
Option 2, but maybe consider Jansen over Stewart :)
Should I field Jansen versus WC or Dunkley versus Geelong?
Jansen.
Dusty v Zork
Quote from: batt on June 19, 2016, 11:30:53 PM
Dusty v Zork
Allow me..
ZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Quote from: jfitty on June 19, 2016, 11:32:54 PM
Quote from: batt on June 19, 2016, 11:30:53 PM
Dusty v Zork
Allow me..
ZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Needs more Z
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Well played above sirs. I think both are musts - I tried to avoid getting Dusty even as a Richmond man, but his last game showed me that he is probably non negotiable.
Phillips v. Reid (gws)?
Did I set myself up for that? Yup.
Quote from: dylanclements on June 20, 2016, 12:19:53 AM
Phillips v. Reid (gws)?
Phillips just so you are afloat R15. Toss of a coin if the bye doesn't matter... probably just edged to Phillips.
Is it worth me trading Tippa to Zorko or save some $$ and trade in Montagna ?
Not sure if the extra cash is worth it or not.
Suggestions plz
FWD premo this week.
Lids vs. Montagna vs. Barlow
M9 mid
Ward vs. Priddis vs. Coniglio
Quote from: Mark on June 20, 2016, 10:03:11 AM
Is it worth me trading Tippa to Zorko or save some $$ and trade in Montagna ?
Not sure if the extra cash is worth it or not.
Suggestions plz
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Quote from: batt on June 20, 2016, 12:22:04 AM
Did I set myself up for that? Yup.
Quote from: dylanclements on June 20, 2016, 12:19:53 AM
Phillips v. Reid (gws)?
Phillips just so you are afloat R15. Toss of a coin if the bye doesn't matter... probably just edged to Phillips.
Struggling for R15 players makes it Phillips for me.
Also who do I keep for D6, Rich or Adams. If I keep Rich then I only have 17 for r15.
Choice of Doc, McVeigh or Rance. Keen on McV for DPP to provide that late season flexibility we always need.
::)
Hi guys and gals. Planning on finally finishing my back line and could use some help with the 6th position.
I have 7 possibles with Shaw and Docherty already in. Here they are:-
Shaw, Docherty, Rance, Simpson, Howe, McVeigh, Bartel.
Ideally I'm after set and forget here as I still have problems in the guts and forward line i.e Liberatore, Cripps (Car), Hall and still have 1 (Monty) upgrade in the forward line. Envisage a full team of prems with only 5 trades left. Help !! ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on June 20, 2016, 04:58:22 PM
::)
Hi guys and gals. Planning on finally finishing my back line and could use some help with the 6th position.
I have 7 possibles with Shaw and Docherty already in. Here they are:-
Shaw, Docherty, Rance, Simpson, Howe, McVeigh, Bartel.
Ideally I'm after set and forget here as I still have problems in the guts and forward line i.e Liberatore, Cripps (Car), Hall and still have 1 (Monty) upgrade in the forward line. Envisage a full team of prems with only 5 trades left. Help !! ;)
Simmo or Rance, I'd go Simmo
Who to bring in this week, other next week.
Docherty (BE 135 vs GWS)
vs
Montagna (BE 130 vs Geel)
Ok so besides GoLions.. Does anyone think it worth paying the extra $$ for Zorko or save $$ and buy Montagna ??
Quote from: GoLions on June 20, 2016, 04:59:34 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on June 20, 2016, 04:58:22 PM
::)
Hi guys and gals. Planning on finally finishing my back line and could use some help with the 6th position.
I have 7 possibles with Shaw and Docherty already in. Here they are:-
Shaw, Docherty, Rance, Simpson, Howe, McVeigh, Bartel.
Ideally I'm after set and forget here as I still have problems in the guts and forward line i.e Liberatore, Cripps (Car), Hall and still have 1 (Monty) upgrade in the forward line. Envisage a full team of prems with only 5 trades left. Help !! ;)
Simmo or Rance, I'd go Simmo
Thanks GL. I was down to Simmo, Bartel and Rance in my calculations. Will bring Bartel and Simmo in this week, then McVeigh next and Howe the week or so after. Cheers mate. ;)
Quote from: Huttabito on June 20, 2016, 05:34:13 PM
Docherty (BE 135 vs GWS)
vs
Montagna (BE 130 vs Geel)
Neither are going anywhere in price quickly, whichever suits byes I reckon
Quote from: Mark on June 20, 2016, 05:49:43 PM
Ok so besides GoLions.. Does anyone think it worth paying the extra $$ for Zorko or save $$ and buy Montagna ??
I said Joey before but if it's your last spot I'm changing my mind, I reckon ZZZZZorko is a must haves this season
Quote from: Mark on June 20, 2016, 05:49:43 PM
Ok so besides GoLions.. Does anyone think it worth paying the extra $$ for Zorko or save $$ and buy Montagna ??
Reckon Zorko will out score Monty enough to warrant the extra $$$ plus show a profit. ;)
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on June 20, 2016, 06:42:00 PM
Quote from: Mark on June 20, 2016, 05:49:43 PM
Ok so besides GoLions.. Does anyone think it worth paying the extra $$ for Zorko or save $$ and buy Montagna ??
Reckon Zorko will out score Monty enough to warrant the extra $$$ plus show a profit. ;)
If byes not an issue pay up for Zorko but if Rd 15 byes is an issue (like me) than go with Tags. I will probably have both and hope Zorks keeps up his 90 - 100 score this week to drop further. ;)
Need to upgrade DBJ to a premo defender.
Thinking:
Rance ($477k) - proven gun, averaging 98
Or
Laird ($472k) - averaging 96 and cheap
Or
McVeigh ($443k) - only averaging 87 but can he get back to lofty heights of yesteryear?
Currently have Shaw, Docherty, Simmo, Adams, Tippa, DBJ, Collins, Lee.
Adams and Tip will be last upgrades, Collins can be bench cover. Lee can sit there and be the retard that he is.
Quote from: Ringo on June 20, 2016, 07:10:26 PM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on June 20, 2016, 06:42:00 PM
Quote from: Mark on June 20, 2016, 05:49:43 PM
Ok so besides GoLions.. Does anyone think it worth paying the extra $$ for Zorko or save $$ and buy Montagna ??
Reckon Zorko will out score Monty enough to warrant the extra $$$ plus show a profit. ;)
If byes not an issue pay up for Zorko but if Rd 15 byes is an issue (like me) than go with Tags. I will probably have both and hope Zorks keeps up his 90 - 100 score this week to drop further. ;)
Yeah might get Montagna this week and hope Zorko has a stinker and drops $$ then have 2 weeks to get him in after his bye. Fingers crossed.
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on June 20, 2016, 09:27:04 PM
Need to upgrade DBJ to a premo defender.
Thinking:
Rance ($477k) - proven gun, averaging 98
Or
Laird ($472k) - averaging 96 and cheap
Or
McVeigh ($443k) - only averaging 87 but can he get back to lofty heights of yesteryear?
Currently have Shaw, Docherty, Simmo, Adams, Tippa, DBJ, Collins, Lee.
Adams and Tip will be last upgrades, Collins can be bench cover. Lee can sit there and be the retard that he is.
Rance being only 5k more sounds good and usually scores above 85
Best of luck
Rich adams d6 and 7 vs Boyd/johanissen/laird and tucker d6 and 7
also boyd/johanissen/laird to snap up in the coming weeks
Dusty or Delidio for a POD?
Delidio is a about 40k cheaper which could help a lot considering I don't have a lot of trades or cash to play with (Cheers Dahlhaus, Tippett and Nic Nat)
rance and pendles
vs
docherty and sloane/treloar/steven/mid tier premo
Quote from: Swoozie on June 20, 2016, 11:20:18 PM
Dusty or Delidio for a POD?
Delidio is a about 40k cheaper which could help a lot considering I don't have a lot of trades or cash to play with (Cheers Dahlhaus, Tippett and Nic Nat)
Martin is a Mus have this year. He is now playing mainly through the midfield and looks basically untaggable. I wouldn't be surprised if he continues to knock out some big tonnes. Will easily average more than lids and montagna
Can only grab 1 this week, then the other the following week.
Rance (BE 93) Vs Bris @ the MCG
Or
Laird (BE 105) Vs Nth @ AO
Thinking Rance is more likely to exceed his BE this week & rise the most?
Quote from: Raiden on June 21, 2016, 12:14:21 PM
Can only grab 1 this week, then the other the following week.
Rance (BE 93) Vs Bris @ the MCG
Or
Laird (BE 105) Vs Nth @ AO
Thinking Rance is more likely to exceed his BE this week & rise the most?
Rance may be a little quiet if it's down the other end all day, I'd be tempted to take Laird at home in an important match.
Bringing in one for wells this week, dont know who to bring in out of
Lids vs Brisbane then Port BE of 128
Montagna vs Geelong then GCS BE of 130
Will probably bring in the one i don't get in a week or two, but don't know which one I should get this week
or should i wait and get dahl in a few weeks
Montagna this week and Dahl in 2-3 wks
Option 1: Stefan Martin + Docherty
vs
Option 2: Gawn + Rampe
Option 2 requires 2 more trades to complete my team (only have 7) but means I have an extra 2 players on field next week.
PLEASE HELP!!!
Quote from: Hawker_08 on June 22, 2016, 06:23:21 PM
Option 1: Stefan Martin + Docherty
vs
Option 2: Gawn + Rampe
Option 2 requires 2 more trades to complete my team (only have 7) but means I have an extra 2 players on field next week.
PLEASE HELP!!!
Treloar V Cotchin V Sloane...... going for a POD at my M7/8
I like option 1.... Docherty is killing it and my opinion is Martin should go back to his old ways, which shows great value
Quote from: mzunguman on June 22, 2016, 06:25:37 PM
Quote from: Hawker_08 on June 22, 2016, 06:23:21 PM
Option 1: Stefan Martin + Docherty
vs
Option 2: Gawn + Rampe
Option 2 requires 2 more trades to complete my team (only have 7) but means I have an extra 2 players on field next week.
PLEASE HELP!!!
Treloar V Cotchin V Sloane...... going for a POD at my M7/8
I like option 1.... Docherty is killing it and my opinion is Martin should go back to his old ways, which shows great value
I was favoring Option 1 as well. Thanks for reassuring my decision. As for yours, I would go Sloane. Trelaor started well but has cooled down and, well, I had Cotchin last year and that is a rollercoaster I got off, and will never get back on. It's up to u buddy.
Rookies - T. Phillips vs S. Reid
Quote from: Raiden on June 21, 2016, 12:14:21 PM
Can only grab 1 this week, then the other the following week.
Rance (BE 93) Vs Bris @ the MCG
Or
Laird (BE 105) Vs Nth @ AO
Thinking Rance is more likely to exceed his BE this week & rise the most?
Write the same comment on another thread - both are great players and represent great value.
I'm picking up both this week, however I feel if I had to choose one it would be Rance.
- very durable
- consistent scorer
- check out his draw over the next 4-6 weeks. Plays a lot of teams with average forward lines which generally means a lot of intercept marks and big points
Montagna + dusty + laird OR
Simmo + ward + Montagna OR
Montagna + laird + deledio?
Quote from: GoTheEagles on June 23, 2016, 11:50:41 AM
Montagna + dusty + laird OR
Simmo + ward + Montagna OR
Montagna + laird + deledio?
Montagna Dusty and Laird
Dusty is a must have, I think he'll blitz it for the rest of the year
Montagna represents great value
Laird has a great run home
Selwood or Rockliff?
Who is the better pick and will score more from here?
Just FYI. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZORKOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO is out...
Trade Macpherson to phillips or dalhaus. I need to make a third trade for the week to ensure im playing 18 players
Quote from: Samsturmfels on June 23, 2016, 07:44:30 PM
Trade Macpherson to phillips or dalhaus. I need to make a third trade for the week to ensure im playing 18 players
Trade Macpherson I reckon.
Dahlhaus will be back in 2-3 weeks.
Phillips or Mathierson? Don't need Phillips DPP.
Quote from: no eye deer on June 23, 2016, 11:53:12 PM
Phillips or Mathierson? Don't need Phillips DPP.
Phillips. Matho wont play next week, Phillips might.
Preferred option?
In: Docherty, Neale and one of Philips/Mathieson out: Tippa, Zaharakis and Gresham ($30k left) OR
In: Docherty, Bartel, and one of Philips/Mathieson out: Tippa, Hartley, Zaharakis (1 prem u/g left in mid) ($100k left)
Only going for league (and stronger long term team - currently sitting 2nd) so don't mind if Neale doesnt play next week - just don't want any prices to move against me so I can't afford who I want.
Petracca (M9) + boyd vs Davis (M9) + johanissen/laird
Quote from: WizzFizz on June 25, 2016, 12:53:09 AM
Petracca (M9) + boyd vs Davis (M9) + johanissen/laird
1 easy...
Confused, as both #1s are more expensive, and both #2 are cheaper so doens't really compare... ???
Quote from: js19 on June 25, 2016, 02:09:14 AM
Quote from: WizzFizz on June 25, 2016, 12:53:09 AM
Petracca (M9) + boyd vs Davis (M9) + johanissen/laird
1 easy...
Confused, as both #1s are more expensive, and both #2 are cheaper so doens't really compare... ???
flower meant the other way around
Petracca (M9) + johanissen/laird vs Davis (M9) + boyd
Quote from: WizzFizz on June 25, 2016, 11:35:13 AM
Petracca (M9) + johanissen/laird vs Davis (M9) + boyd
Laird with Petracca for bench cover comfortably. Davis is a spud and not sure if Boyd's scoring will hold up once Johannisen comes back.
Docherty with Petracca as M/F cover v Rance with Motlop as M/F cover
McVeigh v Docherty
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 27, 2016, 12:39:54 AM
Quote from: steven3 on June 26, 2016, 10:50:22 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 26, 2016, 10:39:47 PM
McVeigh v Docherty
Docherty without a doubt.
let me rephrase
doch +17k VS mcveigh +140k
I dont like McVeigh as an option this year. He has only gone +100 twice in 10 games.
Dont get me wrong, he is a great player but his role in the Sydney team this year isnt as SC friendly as it has been previously.
I think Doc is a gun - watched him vs Carlton very closely to see if hes worth spending $560k for and he has pretty much sold me on being a 110-15 average player from here.
He wont cop a tag, can get contested footy, beautiful long and accurate kick, gets a bunch of intercept possies per game and I think above all, he is in a pretty poor team so the ball will be down there a bit = more opportunity for bigger scores
However - if you are looking to save money - Matt Suckling?
Great value at $420 for a guy that will be around 90-95ppg
Greene Vs Hall
Quote from: jeesh on June 28, 2016, 12:53:17 PM
Greene Vs Hall
next week.
$900,900 for two defenders, 1 to be D7 after byes. Already have Shaw, Simpson, Bartel, Laird and Rance.
McVeigh/Suckling the best split?
montagna vs JJK
NRoo + Petracca F7/M9
Or
Kerridge/Hall F7/M9 and loophole each week.
Quote from: _wato on June 28, 2016, 06:46:11 PM
NRoo + Petracca F7/M9
This is hard if you expect Tracca to fall off the pace a bit. Because it's his first season I am expecting this. But NRoo has a good ceiling and is playing some cracking footy. I would take this combo but think it is risky, and it's ultimately because I don't rate Hall
Quote from: Huttabito on June 28, 2016, 05:44:27 PM
Quote from: jeesh on June 28, 2016, 12:53:17 PM
Greene Vs Hall
next week.
$900,900 for two defenders, 1 to be D7 after byes. Already have Shaw, Simpson, Bartel, Laird and Rance.
McVeigh/Suckling the best split?
Jj and Yeo/McVeigh
Quote from: _wato on June 28, 2016, 06:46:11 PM
NRoo + Petracca F7/M9
Or
Kerridge/Hall F7/M9 and loophole each week.
NRoo/Tracca easyyyy
Franklin + 50k vs JJK (trading kerridge and only Adams at D6 to upgrade)
[/quote]
$900,900 for two defenders, 1 to be D7 after byes. Already have Shaw, Simpson, Bartel, Laird and Rance.
McVeigh/Suckling the best split?
[/quote]
I have Suckling and Savage, Been a fun ride and great POD. Worth a look.
Who to trade?
Petracca v Kerridge v Hall
and who to?
Deledio v Zerrett
Docherty/McVeigh Vs Simpson/Boyd (JJ's close return worries me a bit)
Quote from: Raiden on June 30, 2016, 01:22:19 PM
Docherty/McVeigh Vs Simpson/Boyd (JJ's close return worries me a bit)
Doch/McVeigh
Look at boyds first 4 games. JJ was playing
Simpson + Kerridge vs McVeigh + Deledio/Montags ?
Quote from: roo boys! on June 30, 2016, 02:02:21 PM
Simpson + Kerridge vs McVeigh + Deledio/Montags ?
McVeigh and Joey
Quote from: Jimmykidd on June 30, 2016, 01:35:26 PM
Quote from: Raiden on June 30, 2016, 01:22:19 PM
Docherty/McVeigh Vs Simpson/Boyd (JJ's close return worries me a bit)
Doch/McVeigh
Look at boyds first 4 games. JJ was playing
Yeah thanks mate, that's the part i was worried about as he was under 100 in all those games.
Sloane Vs Treloar + 60K Vs Wait a week and grab Neale
Quote from: colmullet on June 30, 2016, 03:21:53 PM
Sloane Vs Treloar + 60K Vs Wait a week and grab Neale
I'm liking Treloar... Collingwood should start to have some players comeback from injury, meaning the overall team should start to play better.. I feel like teams will target Neale with a tag which may cull his influence.. As for Sloane I wished I had picked him up a couple of weeks ago, ah the regrets
Final Mid Spot + D7 cover.
Docherty/Adams
vs
McVeigh/Yeo
Quote from: Huttabito on June 30, 2016, 04:45:59 PM
Final Mid Spot + D7 cover.
Docherty/Adams
vs
McVeigh/Yeo
i think you meant DEF spot? :P
Tippa for Docherty or Hall for Monty?
Really need a defender in this week:
Logan Austin vs Nathan Broad vs Tom Lee vs Mitch Brown (WCE)
Slim pickings, but don't really need them to play after this week (although it would be nice)
Kerridge, Hall or Barlow for Montagna? No idea :(
Quote from: colmullet on June 30, 2016, 03:21:53 PM
Sloane Vs Treloar + 60K Vs Wait a week and grab Neale
Any other thoughts on this?
Quote from: mzunguman on June 30, 2016, 08:11:37 PM
Quote from: colmullet on June 30, 2016, 03:21:53 PM
Sloane Vs Treloar + 60K Vs Wait a week and grab Neale
Any other thoughts on this?
I'm leaning towards Treloar aswell for what its worth, Sloane is mighty tempting though and if Neale duplicates his first half of the year in the last half dozen weeks he's hard to go past to
JJK vs Buddy
Quote from: HotTiges on June 30, 2016, 08:31:16 PM
JJK vs Buddy
I would take buddy
JJK doesn't get enough disposals to get high scores
However, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets a big 175+ tonight
10 goals is a possibility
Doc, Simpson & Libba Vs Doc, McVeigh & Neale?
Quote from: Raiden on July 01, 2016, 09:03:15 AM
Doc, Simpson & Libba Vs Doc, McVeigh & Neale?
My guess from here in:
Simpson 100, Libba 95 = 195
Neale 115, McVeigh 90 = 205
Stuck with Libba myself, so wouldn't mind dealing with him. Trades though...
Joyce v Broad.
Joyce mid/def v Broad better js (?).
Quote from: js19 on July 01, 2016, 09:06:10 AM
Quote from: Raiden on July 01, 2016, 09:03:15 AM
Doc, Simpson & Libba Vs Doc, McVeigh & Neale?
My guess from here in:
Simpson 100, Libba 95 = 195
Neale 115, McVeigh 90 = 205
Stuck with Libba myself, so wouldn't mind dealing with him. Trades though...
Thanks mate, yeah also thinking the same - McVeigh has the potential also to match Simpson
Quote from: Thewizz71 on July 01, 2016, 09:33:49 AM
Joyce v Broad.
Joyce mid/def v Broad better js (?).
Probably Joyce, he seems to be getting game time & the Mid/Def may come in handy for you. Broad has only played the one game so still some uncertainty.
This is a bit of a different player x vs player y.
Who to keep out of Brand and Lee?
Need to ditch one of them for Hipwood/Uebergang so I can move Adams from forward to defense as I have 8 forwards playing this week.
Going to be forced to trade out one of Barlow & Dahlhaus this week.
Any advice as to which one?
Pittard vs JJ?
JJ more risk but more reward too...
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 01, 2016, 04:41:11 PM
This is a bit of a different player x vs player y.
Who to keep out of Brand and Lee?
Need to ditch one of them for Hipwood/Uebergang so I can move Adams from forward to defense as I have 8 forwards playing this week.
I'd probably keep Lee mate
Quote from: Marcon on July 01, 2016, 07:19:50 PM
Going to be forced to trade out one of Barlow & Dahlhaus this week.
Any advice as to which one?
That's a real tough one :P hmmm I'd probably drop Dahl
Pendles vs Dusty Martin, don't have either and looking for a Barlow replacement. Advance cheers.
Leaning towards Pendles, but Dusty in fine form.
Quote from: frenzy on July 01, 2016, 08:01:41 PM
Pendles vs Dusty Martin, don't have either and looking for a Barlow replacement. Advance cheers.
Leaning towards Pendles, but Dusty in fine form.
Pendles, easily a 10ppg + upgrade on Dusty.
@BM,
You have Boyd too yeah? I'd go Pittard but JJ worth the risk imo
Last spot to finish my mids. Neale vs Ward vs JPK vs Treloar vs Parker
Worth upgrading Petrecca instead of Davis to get the extra cash? It'll mean I lose mid/fwd dpp but have cover in mids (Davis & Trengove) and Fwds (Phillips and Menadue).
Quote from: tommy10 on July 03, 2016, 11:55:16 PM
Last spot to finish my mids. Neale vs Ward vs JPK vs Treloar vs Parker
Worth upgrading Petrecca instead of Davis to get the extra cash? It'll mean I lose mid/fwd dpp but have cover in mids (Davis & Trengove) and Fwds (Phillips and Menadue).
Neale>Treloar>Ward>Parker>JPK for me but honestly think they are all great choices, maybe comes down to your cash. Also don't trust Davis and would keep Tracca and DPP option.
Good luck.
Who to ditch for Zorko, Kerridge or Petracca?
And who out of Bartel, Docherty, McVeigh for final backline spot?
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 04, 2016, 12:32:17 AM
Who to ditch for Zorko, Kerridge or Petracca?
And who out of Bartel, Docherty, McVeigh for final backline spot?
If cash isn't an issue, petracca and docherty
Viney v Boak v Kelly
Would ideally like Dahlhouse but he is injured :(
McVeigh vs M. Boyd??
Z. Merrett v N. Riewoldt v B. Deledio??
Quote from: smashbox on July 04, 2016, 11:01:55 AM
McVeigh vs M. Boyd??
Z. Merrett v N. Riewoldt v B. Deledio??
Boyd and Deledio.
But...
McVeigh v JJ?
McVeigh v JJ?
Considering this as well. Leaning towards McVeigh as longer history and DPP
Bartel vs McVeigh? :-\
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 04, 2016, 01:25:18 PM
Bartel vs McVeigh? :-\
Just. maybe?
Don't think there is to much between them from here on and that 50k will be handy.
Hanners v Neale
Quote from: Keith Urban on July 04, 2016, 02:31:32 PM
Hanners v Neale
Hanners = Neale IMO
What's the best upgrade this week
Hall F6 over Lycett on field
Or
Ward/Coniglio M8 over Libba?
Quote from: js19 on July 04, 2016, 03:42:14 PM
Quote from: Keith Urban on July 04, 2016, 02:31:32 PM
Hanners v Neale
Hanners = Neale IMO
What's the best upgrade this week
Hall F6 over Lycett on field
Or
Ward/Coniglio M8 over Libba?
2nd option i think..I like Lycett as sole ruck
Buddy (already have 3 Swans) vs Roo (montags in FWD line) 'full premo' side after this trade
Quote from: HotTiges on July 04, 2016, 11:00:15 PM
Quote from: js19 on July 04, 2016, 03:42:14 PM
Quote from: Keith Urban on July 04, 2016, 02:31:32 PM
Hanners v Neale
Hanners = Neale IMO
What's the best upgrade this week
Hall F6 over Lycett on field
Or
Ward/Coniglio M8 over Libba?
2nd option i think..I like Lycett as sole ruck
Buddy (already have 3 Swans) vs Roo (montags in FWD line) 'full premo' side after this trade
Roo as a better POD
Who to keep out Petracca F6 and Adams D6?? Running low on trades so will have to keep one!
Quote from: mzunguman on July 04, 2016, 11:19:05 PM
Quote from: HotTiges on July 04, 2016, 11:00:15 PM
Quote from: js19 on July 04, 2016, 03:42:14 PM
Quote from: Keith Urban on July 04, 2016, 02:31:32 PM
Hanners v Neale
Hanners = Neale IMO
What's the best upgrade this week
Hall F6 over Lycett on field
Or
Ward/Coniglio M8 over Libba?
2nd option i think..I like Lycett as sole ruck
Buddy (already have 3 Swans) vs Roo (montags in FWD line) 'full premo' side after this trade
Roo as a better POD
Who to keep out Petracca F6 and Adams D6?? Running low on trades so will have to keep one!
I'd keep Petracca mate.
::)
Thinking of outing either P Cripps or Libba for either Ward, Z Merritt or J Lewis . Any thoughts and lots of thoughts or further suggestions please Sorry, my current midfield is :- Dangerfield, Selwood, Pendlebury, Hannerbury, Parker, Ablett, P Cripps and Liberatore. Only have the trade space to do one of the trades. Which is the best or should I sacrifice another trade and take someone higher? Who ?? :-\
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on July 05, 2016, 12:04:00 AM
::)
Thinking of outing either P Cripps or Libba for either Ward, Z Merritt or J Lewis . Any thoughts and lots of thoughts or further suggestions please Sorry, my current midfield is :- Dangerfield, Selwood, Pendlebury, Hannerbury, Parker, Ablett, P Cripps and Liberatore. Only have the trade space to do one of the trades. Which is the best or should I sacrifice another trade and take someone higher? Who ?? :-\
I'd go for Ward out of that lot mate.
Zorko Vs Lids?
Worried about Zorko taking personal leave and Rocky in form Vs Lids in a team that will start playing kids more and seeing where the list is at.
Quote from: Ingram on July 05, 2016, 01:39:37 AM
Zorko Vs Lids?
Worried about Zorko taking personal leave and Rocky in form Vs Lids in a team that will start playing kids more and seeing where the list is at.
Zorko only took personal leave as his mrs had a baby.
That's good to hear I was worried it was something serious. I still hope he can pump out the goods with Rocky back.
Hanners v Neale v Ward?
:)
Exactly in the order you have them.
Which player to trade OUT for Parker?
Libba (BE 124) v Cripps (BE 122)
Next week the other turns into Pendles, so want to trade the one that will leak more cash this week!
Thinking Libba may have a better chance of achieving it vs Tigers than Cripps vs the Crows?
Adams to Boyd/Bartel/McVeigh/JJ/Rance??
Quote from: freddo81 on July 06, 2016, 12:23:07 AM
Adams to Boyd/Bartel/McVeigh/JJ/Rance??
For value, McVeigh. For pure scoring potential Bartel. Has a very cushy draw as the cats play a lot of bottom teams and at skilled where Jimmy loves racking up points
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 05, 2016, 11:54:54 PM
Which player to trade OUT for Parker?
Libba (BE 124) v Cripps (BE 122)
Next week the other turns into Pendles, so want to trade the one that will leak more cash this week!
Thinking Libba may have a better chance of achieving it vs Tigers than Cripps vs the Crows?
Cripps this week and Libba the week after I reckon mate.
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 06, 2016, 01:34:11 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 05, 2016, 11:54:54 PM
Which player to trade OUT for Parker?
Libba (BE 124) v Cripps (BE 122)
Next week the other turns into Pendles, so want to trade the one that will leak more cash this week!
Thinking Libba may have a better chance of achieving it vs Tigers than Cripps vs the Crows?
Cripps this week and Libba the week after I reckon mate.
Quote from: King_Robbo on July 06, 2016, 01:33:30 AM
Quote from: freddo81 on July 06, 2016, 12:23:07 AM
Adams to Boyd/Bartel/McVeigh/JJ/Rance??
For value, McVeigh. For pure scoring potential Bartel. Has a very cushy draw as the cats play a lot of bottom teams and at skilled where Jimmy loves racking up points
Cheers mate!
Quote from: King_Robbo on July 06, 2016, 01:33:30 AM
Quote from: freddo81 on July 06, 2016, 12:23:07 AM
Adams to Boyd/Bartel/McVeigh/JJ/Rance??
For value, McVeigh. For pure scoring potential Bartel. Has a very cushy draw as the cats play a lot of bottom teams and at skilled where Jimmy loves racking up points
Funnily enough, I actually prefer all of Boyd, McVeigh, Rance & JJ to Bartel. I'm concerned we might see a few repeats of the Saints game/his early season form plus he's at risk of a rest.
Boyd > Rance > McVeigh > JJ > Bartel
Z.Williams V McVeigh...... looking for a POD at D6
Quote from: mzunguman on July 06, 2016, 01:37:52 PM
Z.Williams V McVeigh...... looking for a POD at D6
Williams for me, think McVeigh's ownership will rise a fair bit over the next few weeks
Sloane v Neale v Hanners
Quote from: Keith Urban on July 07, 2016, 08:32:18 PM
Sloane v Neale v Hanners
I'd go Hanners.
Merrett vs Deledio vs Montagna
Should I take Brand's 92 or take a punt on Collins??
Quote from: Keeper27 on July 08, 2016, 02:22:08 AM
Should I take Brand's 92 or take a punt on Collins??
No brainer to take the 92
Dusty Martin vs Zorko (ideally both but may not have the room)
Quote from: roo boys! on July 08, 2016, 08:04:44 PM
Dusty Martin vs Zorko (ideally both but may not have the room)
I'd grab Zorks, great value for cash
Quote from: Raiden on July 08, 2016, 08:16:44 PM
Quote from: roo boys! on July 08, 2016, 08:04:44 PM
Dusty Martin vs Zorko (ideally both but may not have the room)
I'd grab Zorks, great value for cash
Was leaning that way for the same reasoning, extra 60k could come in handy this time of year. Thanks mate :)
Hipwood vs Silvagni?
Need a forward rookie in, not worried about the price difference.
I'm assuming Hipwood will play out the year so leaning that way.. Can see Silvagni going in and out of the side a bit.
Hall vs Lids vs Roo one to be dropped
Quote from: jfitty on July 08, 2016, 11:03:45 PM
Hipwood vs Silvagni?
Need a forward rookie in, not worried about the price difference.
I'm assuming Hipwood will play out the year so leaning that way.. Can see Silvagni going in and out of the side a bit.
SOSOS. Hipwood rubbish
Quote from: WizzFizz on July 09, 2016, 01:09:24 AM
Hall vs Lids vs Roo one to be dropped
You're dropping one of these 3? WTF?? Your team must be the balls
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 09, 2016, 01:12:19 AM
Quote from: WizzFizz on July 09, 2016, 01:09:24 AM
Hall vs Lids vs Roo one to be dropped
You're dropping one of these 3? WTF?? Your team must be the balls
well its one of them or buddy's 94
Quote from: WizzFizz on July 09, 2016, 02:11:51 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 09, 2016, 01:12:19 AM
Quote from: WizzFizz on July 09, 2016, 01:09:24 AM
Hall vs Lids vs Roo one to be dropped
You're dropping one of these 3? WTF?? Your team must be the balls
well its one of them or buddy's 94
So u mean benching as opposed to trading?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 09, 2016, 01:11:21 AM
Quote from: jfitty on July 08, 2016, 11:03:45 PM
Hipwood vs Silvagni?
Need a forward rookie in, not worried about the price difference.
I'm assuming Hipwood will play out the year so leaning that way.. Can see Silvagni going in and out of the side a bit.
SOSOS. Hipwood rubbish
Haha, will he play out the year do you think BBB?
Quote from: jfitty on July 09, 2016, 11:13:17 AM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 09, 2016, 01:11:21 AM
Quote from: jfitty on July 08, 2016, 11:03:45 PM
Hipwood vs Silvagni?
Need a forward rookie in, not worried about the price difference.
I'm assuming Hipwood will play out the year so leaning that way.. Can see Silvagni going in and out of the side a bit.
SOSOS. Hipwood rubbish
Haha, will he play out the year do you think BBB?
I hope so Jfitty, I hope so. I had a few drinks last night so a few posts were a bit blunt. Hence my warning message from moderators in one particular thread :-X
Soooooooo....
Savage > Boyd and Ablett > Bont/Steven/Selwood.
Thoughts?
Quote from: ivolve on July 10, 2016, 11:57:12 PM
Soooooooo....
Savage > Boyd and Ablett > Bont/Steven/Selwood.
Thoughts?
I like. Boyd and Bont/Jelwood for me. Steven too inconsistent.
Robbie Gray vs Stephen Coniglio vs Cal Ward
Rance Vs Gibson Vs Enright?
Thinking in this exact order, worried that Gibson/Enright might get rested a game.
Quote from: Raiden on July 11, 2016, 09:05:22 AM
Rance Vs Gibson Vs Enright?
Thinking in this exact order, worried that Gibson/Enright might get rested a game.
I think Rance is a safe pick... Then Gibson and Enright, same as you!
Neale v Sloane
Z. Merrett or a fit again Barlow?
ward v priddis
Boyd/ JJ or McVeigh?
and
Sloane v Bont?
Quote from: billnats on July 11, 2016, 07:30:08 PM
Z. Merrett or a fit again Barlow?
Merrett, been great all year
Quote from: Jimmykidd on July 11, 2016, 07:53:11 PM
ward v priddis
Priddis, in better form at the moment
Quote from: B. on July 11, 2016, 08:08:53 PM
Boyd/ JJ or McVeigh?
and
Sloane v Bont?
Tough one, Boyd will score the best but worried about a rest, I'd go him just
Sloane, because bias ;)
Steven V Jelwood V Sloane
Quote from: GVSKiwi on July 11, 2016, 08:25:21 PM
Steven V Jelwood V Sloane
Hmmm, think Sloaney could really kill it from now on. Would probably go with him unless the extra cash from Steven can be really useful.
Ablett to Pendles/Sloane/Jelwood???
Quote from: freddo81 on July 11, 2016, 11:44:36 PM
Ablett to Pendles/Sloane/Jelwood???
Has to be Pendles. 8)
Looking at Savage to Boyd but will cost 2 trades. Tempted to just cop Savage on the chin and wait for shaw to drop.
2 trades and Savage to Boyd, or hold and re-evaluate in 2 weeks?
Sloane vs Selwood vs Neale vs Bont :P
Quote from: ivolve on July 12, 2016, 03:46:49 AM
Looking at Savage to Boyd but will cost 2 trades. Tempted to just cop Savage on the chin and wait for shaw to drop.
2 trades and Savage to Boyd, or hold and re-evaluate in 2 weeks?
Save the trade, hope Savage goes respectable and get Shaw if you can.
Quote from: Maca24 on July 12, 2016, 09:29:01 AM
Sloane vs Selwood vs Neale vs Bont :P
Neale > Bont > Selwood > Sloane... Based on Neale being steady high, Bont recent form, can he keep it up?, Selwood safe pick, Sloane good pick... If that makes sense.
Shaw + Ward v Neale + JJ
Ablett to Bont/Selwood/Neale/JPK/Parker
Don't think I've left anyone out.
Pendels...
Zorko or Priddis ????
Quote from: russty on July 12, 2016, 01:17:52 PM
Ablett to Bont/Selwood/Neale/JPK/Parker
Don't think I've left anyone out.
Hmmm, probably Neale. But tbh all those guys are good options. Parker is the only one I wouldn't be as keen on.
Quote from: Mark on July 13, 2016, 11:10:43 PM
Zorko or Priddis ????
If forwards aren't done, then Zorko. If they are, then maybe still Zorko :P
To Keep Petracca or Menadue as rotating backup? Assuming both keep playing, Mena in a decent patch of form but maybe Petracca Will pick up?
Quote from: Ingram on July 14, 2016, 02:32:06 AM
To Keep Petracca or Menadue as rotating backup? Assuming both keep playing, Mena in a decent patch of form but maybe Petracca Will pick up?
I have same issue and are keeping Menadue over Petracca. As u said he is in some good form and I think will get some good game time, whereas Petracca seems to have hit a wall.
Quote from: Ingram on July 14, 2016, 02:32:06 AM
To Keep Petracca or Menadue as rotating backup? Assuming both keep playing, Mena in a decent patch of form but maybe Petracca Will pick up?
I've got both and am trading Menadue this week.
If not for his 130 he probably would've been out of my team already. Reckon that score was a one off and just glad that he had it.
Easy decision for me. Never even contemplated trading Petracca over Menadue.
Pick two of Menadue, Jansen, Petracca.... Gotta play one at M8 + F6 :/
Don't know Jensen at all.
Petracca and Menapoo.
Bont or Zerrett (both ave 106) but Zerrett DPP could be handy.
Quote from: tor01doc on July 14, 2016, 01:27:44 PM
Don't know Jensen at all.
Petracca and Menapoo.
Bont or Zerrett (both ave 106) but Zerrett DPP could be handy.
If you don't have DPP already get Zerrett... Otherwise the Bont... Love him as a POD
Priddis v Ward v Treloar for m8 spot
Quote from: Jimmykidd on July 14, 2016, 02:13:34 PM
Priddis v Ward v Treloar for m8 spot
Ward > Treloar > Priddis. I already have all 3
Motagna vs Gunston vs Tippet vs JJKennedy
Quote from: dmac07 on July 14, 2016, 02:24:45 PM
Quote from: Jimmykidd on July 14, 2016, 02:13:34 PM
Priddis v Ward v Treloar for m8 spot
Ward > Treloar > Priddis. I already have all 3
Must be frustrating :P
Ward purely because of his run home?
As Gaz's Replacement
Neale vs Bontempelli Vs Hanners
Upgrade only 1 of Stewart or Phillips or Trengrove?
Trade Adams to Hurn or keep Adams until another target comes along? Only got 7 trades left
Pick 2: Ward, Treloar, Gray, Sidebum, Congilio, Cotchin
Zorko or Priddis ???
Quote from: Mark on July 15, 2016, 05:33:49 PM
Zorko or Priddis ???
Priddis based on recent form
Quote from: Mark on July 15, 2016, 05:33:49 PM
Zorko or Priddis ???
Priddis.
Zorko averaging 96 since Rocky has returned. Priddis averaging 110 since Rd8, only one sub 100 score of 76 when tagged out of the game by Robbo.
Priddis also I like
simpson v boyd for last defender?
Trelour v Cotchin v coniglio
Want to trade Libba and only have 543,000 already have ward Priddis
Cheers
Quote from: jrmoo on July 16, 2016, 09:33:09 AM
Trelour v Cotchin v coniglio
Want to trade Libba and only have 543,000 already have ward Priddis
Cheers
Conig>Cotchin>Treloar
Robbie Gray is another option
Priddis or Gray? Need to decide today. West Coast have a tough SC finals draw, but Ports isn't much better.
I like Priddis.. Doesn't really get tagged as he gets heaps of the ball but doesn't really hurt the opposition. He just sets up the players who kick the goals etc..
I'm going Priddis
Yeah I'm leaning towards Priddis, but I have a sneaky feeling Gray will finish strongly as well. Eagles will be playing for finals though, so that probably seals it for me.
Quote from: no eye deer on July 16, 2016, 02:47:32 PM
Yeah I'm leaning towards Priddis, but I have a sneaky feeling Gray will finish strongly as well. Eagles will be playing for finals though, so that probably seals it for me.
Priddis locked in for me also, at the end of the day the Eagles have a top 8 pos to fight for. Port, they will fall short...
Quote from: Raiden on July 16, 2016, 06:56:48 PM
Quote from: no eye deer on July 16, 2016, 02:47:32 PM
Yeah I'm leaning towards Priddis, but I have a sneaky feeling Gray will finish strongly as well. Eagles will be playing for finals though, so that probably seals it for me.
Priddis locked in for me also, at the end of the day the Eagles have a top 8 pos to fight for. Port, they will fall short...
Not so sure about that, Port may replace north in the 8.
I have Gray and very happy. He's pretty unique and has been scoring well of late
Have a weird one for y'all.
Who scores more from here, Clay Smith or Dan Rich?
Quote from: batt on July 17, 2016, 09:03:28 PM
Have a weird one for y'all.
Who scores more from here, Clay Smith or Dan Rich?
Smith.
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 17, 2016, 09:09:23 PM
Quote from: batt on July 17, 2016, 09:03:28 PM
Have a weird one for y'all.
Who scores more from here, Clay Smith or Dan Rich?
Smith.
Rich tagged and covered most games.
Smith good option for coverage and loophole. Score same if not more and generate cash savings.
Quote from: crowls on July 17, 2016, 10:30:29 PM
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 17, 2016, 09:09:23 PM
Quote from: batt on July 17, 2016, 09:03:28 PM
Have a weird one for y'all.
Who scores more from here, Clay Smith or Dan Rich?
Smith.
Rich tagged and covered most games.
Smith good option for coverage and loophole. Score same if not more and generate cash savings.
Cash is irrelevant. Trying to figure out which line to boost with a Barlow trade out. Things are dire.
Quote from: batt on July 17, 2016, 09:03:28 PM
Have a weird one for y'all.
Who scores more from here, Clay Smith or Dan Rich?
Clay Smith. I think he's about to show the footy world why he was picked in the first round of the draft and why he's so highly rated down at the kennel.
Z. Williams v M. Boyd last def upgrade
Quote from: Jimmykidd on July 18, 2016, 12:12:01 AM
Z. Williams v M. Boyd last def upgrade
Boyd will probably average slightly more, but I'd go Williams purely for a point of difference.
Midfield is as follows -
Danger, Pendles, Parker, Hannebery, Sloane, Priddis, Gray, Libba. (Mathieson, Stewart, Phillips)
I have $343K in the bank for one upgrade in the mids.
Do I trade Mathieson - Jelwood, Neale, JPK, Coniglio, Bont or Rocky?
Or do I keep Mathieson as extra bench cover with Libba and trade Stewart to Ward who is best available?
Quote from: TomK on July 18, 2016, 04:49:52 PM
Midfield is as follows -
Danger, Pendles, Parker, Hannebery, Sloane, Priddis, Gray, Libba. (Mathieson, Stewart, Phillips)
I have $343K in the bank for one upgrade in the mids.
Do I trade Mathieson - Jelwood, Neale, JPK, Coniglio, Bont or Rocky?
Or do I keep Mathieson as extra bench cover with Libba and trade Stewart to Ward who is best available?
I reckon Libba should be good enough bench cover on his own.
I'd go Mathieson > Neale
How many trades do you have left?
Quote from: TomK on July 18, 2016, 04:49:52 PM
Midfield is as follows -
Danger, Pendles, Parker, Hannebery, Sloane, Priddis, Gray, Libba. (Mathieson, Stewart, Phillips)
I have $343K in the bank for one upgrade in the mids.
Do I trade Mathieson - Jelwood, Neale, JPK, Coniglio, Bont or Rocky?
Or do I keep Mathieson as extra bench cover with Libba and trade Stewart to Ward who is best available?
Jelwood or JPK are good options.
Quote from: jfitty on July 18, 2016, 05:23:38 PM
Quote from: TomK on July 18, 2016, 04:49:52 PM
Midfield is as follows -
Danger, Pendles, Parker, Hannebery, Sloane, Priddis, Gray, Libba. (Mathieson, Stewart, Phillips)
I have $343K in the bank for one upgrade in the mids.
Do I trade Mathieson - Jelwood, Neale, JPK, Coniglio, Bont or Rocky?
Or do I keep Mathieson as extra bench cover with Libba and trade Stewart to Ward who is best available?
I reckon Libba should be good enough bench cover on his own.
I'd go Mathieson > Neale
How many trades do you have left?
Yeah he should be but with only one trade left after this, I want as much cover as I can considering we still have 6 weeks I think.
Enright vs Gibbo vs JJ or anyone else?
ferret or zork to replace barlow?
Quote from: ants on July 18, 2016, 08:08:56 PM
ferret or zork to replace barlow?
Prefer Zerrett but can't go wrong with either.
Quote from: NickyBoy on July 18, 2016, 07:31:20 PM
Enright vs Gibbo vs JJ or anyone else?
JJ but not too confident given his last 2...think he'd bounce back now though with those under his belt. Some chance the others could be given a rest.
What about this... I'm getting Docherty this week but don't know who for Ruggles or Collins...so my question is who would you rather as back up D7...Ruggles or Collins. I'll trade the other...difference in money and BEs are no issue.
Quote from: enzedder on July 18, 2016, 08:48:14 PM
Quote from: ants on July 18, 2016, 08:08:56 PM
ferret or zork to replace barlow?
Prefer Zerrett but can't go wrong with either.Quote from: NickyBoy on July 18, 2016, 07:31:20 PM
Enright vs Gibbo vs JJ or anyone else?
JJ but not too confident given his last 2...think he'd bounce back now though with those under his belt. Some chance the others could be given a rest.
What about this... I'm getting Docherty this week but don't know who for Ruggles or Collins...so my question is who would you rather as back up D7...Ruggles or Collins. I'll trade the other...difference in money and BEs are no issue.
Trade Collins, Ruggles scoring quite well.
Bont v Ward plus $77k?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 18, 2016, 09:18:48 PM
Quote from: enzedder on July 18, 2016, 08:48:14 PM
Quote from: ants on July 18, 2016, 08:08:56 PM
ferret or zork to replace barlow?
Prefer Zerrett but can't go wrong with either.Quote from: NickyBoy on July 18, 2016, 07:31:20 PM
Enright vs Gibbo vs JJ or anyone else?
JJ but not too confident given his last 2...think he'd bounce back now though with those under his belt. Some chance the others could be given a rest.
What about this... I'm getting Docherty this week but don't know who for Ruggles or Collins...so my question is who would you rather as back up D7...Ruggles or Collins. I'll trade the other...difference in money and BEs are no issue.
Trade Collins, Ruggles scoring quite well.
Bont v Ward plus $77k?
If you think you can use that $77k mate for a great upgrade then get Ward.
If you can't then you may aswell jump on the Bont train.
I will be starting with Bont next year. LOL! ;D
Quote from: Judd Magic on July 18, 2016, 09:33:41 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 18, 2016, 09:18:48 PM
Quote from: enzedder on July 18, 2016, 08:48:14 PM
Quote from: ants on July 18, 2016, 08:08:56 PM
ferret or zork to replace barlow?
Prefer Zerrett but can't go wrong with either.Quote from: NickyBoy on July 18, 2016, 07:31:20 PM
Enright vs Gibbo vs JJ or anyone else?
JJ but not too confident given his last 2...think he'd bounce back now though with those under his belt. Some chance the others could be given a rest.
What about this... I'm getting Docherty this week but don't know who for Ruggles or Collins...so my question is who would you rather as back up D7...Ruggles or Collins. I'll trade the other...difference in money and BEs are no issue.
Trade Collins, Ruggles scoring quite well.
Bont v Ward plus $77k?
If you think you can use that $77k mate for a great upgrade then get Ward.
If you can't then you may aswell jump on the Bont train.
I will be starting with Bont next year. LOL! ;D
Agree mate - Bont first picked in 2017!
As for will the $77k come in handy, it prob will. But I just want the Bont!! 2 upgrades remaining:
this weeks trades: Libba to Bont, Menadue to Naismith (leaves $188k and 4 trades)
Next week: DBJ to a $500k defender and team is complete with 3 trades left. OR, if I grab Ward instead of Bont I'll be able to afford any defender (prob grab Boyd).
But as I said I want the Bont so will find it hard to pick Ward instead of him!
JPK vs Rockliff vs Neale
Quote from: Maca24 on July 19, 2016, 01:36:23 PM
JPK vs Rockliff vs Neale
I'm going with Rocky.
Rocky>JPK>Neale IMO. Based on the run home.
Quote from: batt on July 19, 2016, 01:51:37 PM
Quote from: Maca24 on July 19, 2016, 01:36:23 PM
JPK vs Rockliff vs Neale
I'm going with Rocky.
Rocky>JPK>Neale IMO. Based on the run home.
My thoughts also, Cheers for the feedback :)
Josh J vs Buddy vs Gunston vs Lids
who do you guys think?
Quote from: NickyBoy on July 19, 2016, 02:37:59 PM
Josh J vs Buddy vs Gunston vs Lids
who do you guys think?
Buddy>Gunston>Lids>JJK
Quote from: NickyBoy on July 19, 2016, 02:37:59 PM
Josh J vs Buddy vs Gunston vs Lids
who do you guys think?
I'd go Gunston from that list for a POD
Oleg Markov v Sam Naismith
Quote from: Bubbles on July 19, 2016, 03:36:02 PM
Oleg Markov v Sam Naismith
I'm choosing Naismith, as he gives me link to R3 Grimley. With Tippet out I hope he still continues to get games and score well. But with Tigers season in tatters I think Markov will definitely get games as well. Depends if you need DPP I guess.
Quote from: Bubbles on July 19, 2016, 03:36:02 PM
Oleg Markov v Sam Naismith
Would definitely get Naimsith if you don't already have ruck cover, but have cover on other lines.
Zorko v Ward v Treloar for M8
Buddy vs Riewoldt
Riewoldt
Quote from: dicko_ on July 21, 2016, 06:00:07 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on July 19, 2016, 03:36:02 PM
Oleg Markov v Sam Naismith
Would definitely get Naimsith if you don't already have ruck cover, but have cover on other lines.
Zorko v Ward v Treloar for M8
If your forwards are complete, then Ward. If not, Zorko.
Quote from: GoLions on July 21, 2016, 08:23:04 PM
Quote from: dicko_ on July 21, 2016, 06:00:07 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on July 19, 2016, 03:36:02 PM
Oleg Markov v Sam Naismith
Would definitely get Naimsith if you don't already have ruck cover, but have cover on other lines.
Zorko v Ward v Treloar for M8
If your forwards are complete, then Ward. If not, Zorko.
I'd go Zorko either way. He's better than the other two.
Quote from: GoLions on July 21, 2016, 08:23:04 PM
Quote from: dicko_ on July 21, 2016, 06:00:07 PM
Quote from: Bubbles on July 19, 2016, 03:36:02 PM
Oleg Markov v Sam Naismith
Would definitely get Naimsith if you don't already have ruck cover, but have cover on other lines.
Zorko v Ward v Treloar for M8
If your forwards are complete, then Ward. If not, Zorko.
+1
Bench cover. 4 trades left
B: Collins, Adams but have laird, bartel and mcveigh. (mcviegh on mid bench this week)
M: Trengrove, Matho, McVeigh
R: Grimley
F. Petracca, Phillips
Option 1.
Trengrove to Naismith via Phillips to mids. gives me r/f cover. Hall/Lids on bench this week, tracca f5, naismith f6. 3 trades left
SMartin at D2 with no cover if late out.
Option 2.
As above and Adams to Clay Smith, via McVeigh. Gives me playing m/f cover and I lose my d/m dpp. down to 2 trades.
Quote from: smashbox on July 21, 2016, 07:58:02 PM
Buddy vs Riewoldt
Buddy
Gaff + Zorko vs Rocky + Wingard
petracca vs m.brown
Bank Goldy's 87, or give Lycett a call up?
Continuing the NRoo Vs Buddy debate. They're to replace Hall. Will have 2 trades left with Dhal on the bench afterwards. I guess I should opt for a less injury prone player in Buddy...
naismth v callum sinclair?
Naismith is the cheaper option but Callum Sinclair has much better game security?
Which one do I take?
Hey boys, looking to upgrade Kerridge (+105k in a straight swap as my final forward (had to trade Hall down last week), leaving me with 2 contingency trades.
Current lineup: Zorko, Joey, Lynch (GCS), Westhoff, Greene, Kerridge (Naismith, Rose)
and am tossing up between the following:
Buddy - Leaning towards him, even if he is following his trend of falling away towards the end of the season.
Lynch (Crows) - My current 2nd - A few easy games to finish off the year could result in some handy scores.
JRoo - Usually consistent for a key forward, though has a tough run.
Lycett - NicNat's return the unknown, though should still score reasonably well. May somehow be useful in conjunction with Naismith if a ruck goes down.
What do you think?
Cheers in advance
Quote from: MC on July 25, 2016, 07:00:50 PM
Hey boys, looking to upgrade Kerridge (+10 in a straight swap as my final forward (had to trade Hall down last week), leaving me with 2 contingency trades.
Current lineup: Zorko, Joey, Lynch (GCS), Westhoff, Greene, Kerridge (Naismith, Rose)
and am tossing up between the following:
Buddy - Leaning towards him, even if he is following his trend of falling away towards the end of the season.
Lynch (Crows) - My current 2nd - A few easy games to finish off the year could result in some handy scores.
JRoo - Usually consistent for a key forward, though has a tough run.
Lycett - NicNat's return the unknown, though should still score reasonably well. May somehow be useful in conjunction with Naismith if a ruck goes down.
What do you think?
Cheers in advance
I would take Lynch because he has the easiest run
It's probably gotta be Buddy tbh. But if you're feeling gutsy I'd take the punt on lil Rooey. Like the thinking a lot and for whatever people think of him, he's not inconsistent and can really play the game
N.Riewoldt or Dahlhaus?
Buddy v Gunston v N Riewoldt??
Zorko, JJ (D6) and 2 trades left
V
Z Merrett, Collins (D6) and 3 trades left
Rockcliff V Sloane V JPK V Bont V Neale
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 25, 2016, 10:47:53 PM
Zorko, JJ (D6) and 2 trades left
V
Z Merrett, Collins (D6) and 3 trades left
Quickly before someone else does it...
Zzzzzzzzzoooorrrrkkkkoooooo
Quote from: tor01doc on July 25, 2016, 11:03:33 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 25, 2016, 10:47:53 PM
Zorko, JJ (D6) and 2 trades left
V
Z Merrett, Collins (D6) and 3 trades left
Quickly before someone else does it...
Zzzzzzzzzoooorrrrkkkkoooooo
;D
Quote from: smashbox on July 25, 2016, 11:02:42 PM
Rockcliff V Sloane V JPK V Bont V Neale
I've done some deep analysis here (http://forum.fanfooty.com.au/index.php/topic,97048.0.html)
Bartel and Dahl vs JJ and Zorko
Boyd on my bench.
Play Brand or Tucker?/??
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 26, 2016, 09:20:57 PM
Bartel and Dahl vs JJ and Zorko
I don't think Dahl will come back firing myself, so would go with JJ and Zorko.
Quote from: Asparagus on July 29, 2016, 04:33:30 PM
Boyd on my bench.
Play Brand or Tucker?/??
Would probably go with Tucker here, reckon he has slightly more potential to score decent.
Neale v Sloane v Ward v Cogniglio
Quote from: smashbox on July 29, 2016, 04:35:12 PM
Neale v Sloane v Ward v Cogniglio
Sloaney for me, can't go wrong with any of them though!
Adams to a mid under $504k, looking at Hanners v Treloar, although considering a demon mid against the Suns. Any of Vince, Viney or Jones could go 120+. Need a league win to make the 8, opponent has Hanners. Always planned on Hanners, but recent form isn't great. Thoughts?
Anyone looking at Harrison himmelberg?
Naismith Vs 71 from Dhalhouse?
Petracca or Kerridge's 71?
Quote from: Ingram on July 30, 2016, 12:17:35 AM
Naismith Vs 71 from Dhalhouse?
Same situation that i'm in! I'm leaning toward Naismith if it helps
Quote from: MC on July 31, 2016, 12:36:53 PM
Quote from: Ingram on July 30, 2016, 12:17:35 AM
Naismith Vs 71 from Dhalhouse?
Same situation that i'm in! I'm leaning toward Naismith if it helps
Hope u did more than lean?!
For final mid...
The Bont
Priddis - really tough draw
Rocky - really bad team
R Gray
JPK - already have Parker and Hanners
- [size=78%]JPK probably most consistent of the lot.[/size]
- [size=78%]Rockliff has huge upside so can make a real difference and win you a game.[/size]
- [size=78%]R Gray and Priddis probably about the same.[/size]
- Bont can be up and down. Like last week so you run that risk.[/size]
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on July 31, 2016, 09:56:39 PM
Quote from: MC on July 31, 2016, 12:36:53 PM
Quote from: Ingram on July 30, 2016, 12:17:35 AM
Naismith Vs 71 from Dhalhouse?
Same situation that i'm in! I'm leaning toward Naismith if it helps
Hope u did more than lean?!
Sure did! ;D
Quote from: tor01doc on August 01, 2016, 12:41:30 AM
For final mid...
The Bont
Priddis - really tough draw
Rocky - really bad team
R Gray
JPK - already have Parker and Hanners
Toss up between JPK and Rocky for me. Probably JPK, regardless of having his teammates. His average is now the best of the three, and his last 5-6 weeks he's shifted up a gear or two! 135/3 and 125/5 sounds pretty good to me!
Dahl v Greene?
Need to upgrade Hall
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 04, 2016, 04:32:11 PM
Dahl v Greene?
Need to upgrade Hall
Dahlhaus but with his high BE, can it wait a week?
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 04, 2016, 04:32:11 PM
Dahl v Greene?
Need to upgrade Hall
Dahlhaus for me.
Grundy vs Mumford?
Quote from: tor01doc on August 04, 2016, 04:56:02 PM
Quote from: Blues Blues Blues on August 04, 2016, 04:32:11 PM
Dahl v Greene?
Need to upgrade Hall
Dahlhaus but with his high BE, can it wait a week?
Probably. Syd plays before GC so I can loophole Naismith - if he doesn't play well I'll trade in Dahl, if he tonnes up I'll wait until next week
Quote from: jfitty on August 04, 2016, 06:05:45 PM
Grundy vs Mumford?
Would normally say Mumford, but he might not even get up this week. If he plays he could go huge, but with the Eagles and Freo coming up, both of whom have dominant rucks returning he doesn't seem appealing. Even then I wouldn't back him to play all four games. Grundy seems in decent form, and even if Cox comes in for Moore he will get to do what he normally does, and seems in good form. So have to go Grundy.
Nroo vs Buddy vs JJK vs Dahl
Current fwd line: Martin, Zorko, Lynch (GC), Gunston, Montagna, _________
Cripps or JPK or Neale?
Grundy vs Naitanui?
Quote from: NickyBoy on August 05, 2016, 04:33:11 PM
Nroo vs Buddy vs JJK vs Dahl
Current fwd line: Martin, Zorko, Lynch (GC), Gunston, Montagna, _________
Dahl, Nroo, JJK, Buddy.
Always go the mid over the kpp.
Cripps vs Tmitch vs Neale vs Sidebottom for M8
Who to field:
Suckling vs McVeigh
Robbo vs Kerridge
Can't loophole either of them due to basically entire bench playing this week
Marcon vs Wills (assuming Marcon makes the cut)
Quote from: NickyBoy on August 11, 2016, 07:38:15 PM
Cripps vs Tmitch vs Neale vs Sidebottom for M8
Neale > Cripps > Sidey > Titch
Quote from: GoLions on August 11, 2016, 10:41:03 PM
Who to field:
Suckling vs McVeigh
Robbo vs Kerridge
Can't loophole either of them due to basically entire bench playing this week
McVeigh and Robbo
Quote from: Gigantor on August 12, 2016, 01:59:20 PM
Marcon vs Wills (assuming Marcon makes the cut)
Marcon
Quote from: GoLions on August 11, 2016, 10:41:03 PM
Who to field:
Suckling vs McVeigh
Robbo vs Kerridge
Can't loophole either of them due to basically entire bench playing this week
McVeigh and Robbo
Rockliff or Sloane?
Quote from: steven3 on August 12, 2016, 05:00:16 PM
Quote from: GoLions on August 11, 2016, 10:41:03 PM
Who to field:
Suckling vs McVeigh
Robbo vs Kerridge
Can't loophole either of them due to basically entire bench playing this week
McVeigh and Robbo
Quote from: Fid on August 12, 2016, 07:54:39 PM
Quote from: GoLions on August 11, 2016, 10:41:03 PM
Who to field:
Suckling vs McVeigh
Robbo vs Kerridge
Can't loophole either of them due to basically entire bench playing this week
McVeigh and Robbo
I love you both <3
Quote from: tkringle on August 12, 2016, 11:26:17 PM
Rockliff or Sloane?
fuark, missed this :-\
Hope you went with Rocky!
field rich or bartel
Depends if you think Rich will get tagged. Probably Bartel will go to him. They both will get 60.
This weekend
Got 80k left and 1 trade. 511K to spend and must win week. Considering trade Bartel to one of Houli, Burgoyne, Pittard, Boyd or Upgrade Stef to goldy?
POD's in cash league comp are: (me first)
Def: Laird, McVeigh v docherty, enright
Mids: Priddis, Treloar, Gray, Rocky v JPK, SMitch, Parker, MCrouch
Rucks, Stef v Goldy
Fwds: Montagna, Hall (Naismith) v Josh Kennedy, Wells.
WCE, Hawks, North and Swans playing first two games. I am left with Boyd as an upgrade option later in the weekend once I see how the scoring is going. Boyd looks like the hail mary option.
Need advise from experienced coaches to see if I am missing options.
Quote from: crowls on August 18, 2016, 08:40:39 PM
Depends if you think Rich will get tagged. Probably Bartel will go to him. They both will get 60.
This weekend
Got 80k left and 1 trade. 511K to spend and must win week. Do I trade Bartel to one of Houli, Burgoyne, Pittard, Boyd or Upgrade Stef to goldy?
Def: Simpson, Shaw, Rance, Laird, Bartel, McVeigh [joyce, collins]
Ruc: Gawn, Stef, Grimley/Naismith
Need advise from experienced coaches which option is better? If I go Def which player is best option.
Stef -> Goldy seeing as Stef is no good when a second ruckman is being played (in this instance Archie Smith)
Have to ask yourself
Goldy + Bartel v Stef + Boyd (for example)
Deffs have to back in Bartel to hit form against Brisbane & Melbourne and Goldy will play every week seeing as North are at risk of losing finals (plus looks fit again)
Good points wato. Bad day with Goldy probably a 90 v 60 for Stef. Any of the def options have a possible floor of 60.
If Goldy gets injured got Naismith to put in as well.
Do I trade Hall-Jansen or Kerridge-Jansen to Long/Dahl ??
So do I trade Hall or Kerridge to Dahl,
Leaning towards Kerridge of course but what's your choice ?
Quote from: Mark on August 18, 2016, 10:39:24 PM
Do I trade Hall-Jansen or Kerridge-Jansen to Long/Dahl ??
So do I trade Hall or Kerridge to Dahl,
Leaning towards Kerridge of course but what's your choice ?
Kerridge for sure. His bad days are so much worse than Hall's.
can see scooter going to rich. ill go with bartel one more time. cant believe i brought in jimmy and he has scored worse than rich lol. typical defense players
Gunston or Hall on field this week?
Quote from: LaHug on August 18, 2016, 11:45:09 PM
Quote from: Mark on August 18, 2016, 10:39:24 PM
Do I trade Hall-Jansen or Kerridge-Jansen to Long/Dahl ??
So do I trade Hall or Kerridge to Dahl,
Leaning towards Kerridge of course but what's your choice ?
Kerridge for sure. His bad days are so much worse than Hall's.
Quote from: MontyJnr on August 19, 2016, 02:06:55 AM
Gunston or Hall on field this week?
flip a coin monty
Need to trade suckling out
Gibson or aish ?
Plz help..
Play M.Brown or Hall ??
Brown has been average over 100 last 2 games and playing doggies indoors last game of the round.
Hall is playing the pies with an average midfield..
Plz help ??
Quote from: crowls on August 18, 2016, 09:42:33 PM
Good points wato. Bad day with Goldy probably a 90 v 60 for Stef. Any of the def options have a possible floor of 60.
If Goldy gets injured got Naismith to put in as well.
Saw Archie and Bartel were out and reversed my goldy trade. Will sit on wether to trade Bartel or take Collins score. Unfortunately after lycetts poor score last week didnt loophole him in fwds and now have 113 sitting on the bench. Ahhh shwoer
Rich to who?
Can afford anyone under $540k.
Have Shaw, Laird, Doch, Simpson and Boyd.
Thoughts?
My opponent has Rance, do I just go Rance?
Quote from: Asparagus on August 20, 2016, 12:55:13 PM
Rich to who?
Can afford anyone under $540k.
Have Shaw, Laird, Doch, Simpson and Boyd.
Thoughts?
My opponent has Rance, do I just go Rance?
Rance or Boyd for mine. Boyd's run home is mighty tempting.
Neale vs Selwood vs Parker vs Cripps
Replacement for Sloane!
Opponent has none of the 4
::)
That's a bloody beauty Macca. I started the season with Cripps because of Carlton's draw during our finals, and he's not letting me down. I'd go Cripps / Neale, Parker Selwood. What I would definitely look at is who you are trading out and the latset stage of the round where you still have multiple trade options. That way you can see how your opponents are going and pick the most valuable option or POD if you need it. Cheers and good luck mate. ;)
I'm in the same boat. Unfortunately the Crows play Friday night, so have to do the trade before the round starts. I don't know whether to get Parker to cancel out my two opponents or risk a pod.
1 trade left, here are my possible scenarios.
Rich --> Rampe/Gibson
Ward --> Viney/Steven
Or do I go one of Nroo or Lynch to Howe?
Orrrrr do i hold all trades?
rich vs bartel
hi all which two to field
WELLS / WARD / HALL
Cripps vs Rocky?