FanFooty Forum

FanFooty => Supercoach Archive => Archives => 2016 Rate My SC Archive => Topic started by: kilbluff1985 on December 08, 2015, 09:56:02 PM

Title: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 08, 2015, 09:56:02 PM
was bored put this together quickly

TEAM NAME: FIGJAM
DEF: M. Hurley, G. Birchall, B. Smith, C. Salem, N. Malceski, D. Viojo-Rainbow (H. Wigg, A. McDonald-Tipungwuti)
MID: N. Fyfe, S. Pendlebury, T. Rockliff, G. Ablett jnr, T. Liberatore, D. Thomas, D. Myers, C. Oliver (M. Kennedy, N. Freeman, J. Gresham)
RUC: T. Goldstein, S. Martin (D. Currie)
FWD: C. Wingard, M. Barlow, D. Smith, K. Langford, J. Lamb, B. Williams (C. Petracca, J. Pickett)
CASH LEFT: $47,700

Most of the rookies are place holders obviously

Salem and Malceski scored ok towards the end of this year so the calculated risks

same with Thomas and Myers both under 250k but we know they worth more then that
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Money Shot on December 08, 2015, 10:42:15 PM
Would love your thoughts on Langford. Cheers.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: fasttrack13 on December 08, 2015, 11:54:17 PM
Gday KB
Loving some of these picks Salem and Smith in particular...
Salem would probably end up your D6/7 around 85ppg not quite premo material yet... Smith may see more midfield time with Treloar gone allowing him to reach the potential he was expected to last year.
If Essendon are set to rise even slightly up the ladder then I agree with Hurley in your team has huge potential as an intercepting and rebounding key defender!
Langford I assume is in the bombers 22 if he's in your team.. Unless he's a place holder rookie as you've mentioned!
A lot of upside mate
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 09, 2015, 09:50:01 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 08, 2015, 10:42:15 PM
Would love your thoughts on Langford. Cheers.

i'm a huge fan of his rate him very highly

he applies pressure and is smart when under pressure

he is fighting for a bench spot with about 10 players in our best 22 though
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: dmac07 on December 10, 2015, 04:01:23 PM
Like some of the risks, dont like others.

Def - Dojt mind Hurley, Salem, even Malceski thought i wouldnt pick him. Dont like the Birxhall pick, just him in a slow decline, might just make top 10 defenders but only going to go down in value.

Mids - like, most of us will have those similar premiums, im avoiding libba but can see good reasons why a lot of people have him. Thomas and myers underpriced, and will depend on how good the rookies look.

Ruck - Big money spent here, but can set and forget. Could also save some cash here though potentially.

Fwd - like wingard, like D . Smith, could average 100 next year. dont like barlow, think neale took a lot of his points with his improvement and think barlow might be on the decline, or at least becoming more of a role player than full time mid. Not big on lamb for langford, 2 on field spots for guys i wouldnt be sure will plqy more than 50% of games.

Overall i like it, but would look at downgrading a ruck and changing out birchall and barlow.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 16, 2015, 04:59:24 PM
cant get Simpson off the bench for some reason

(http://i68.tinypic.com/lkspz.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Gigantor on December 16, 2015, 05:12:10 PM
Nice spread

Same fwd line setup as mine, I'm happy to take the punt of Leuy at F3

If a 4 solid def rookies are available rd1 i would downgrade Malceski and turn Myers into Libba
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: fasttrack13 on December 16, 2015, 05:24:40 PM
how much cash left? seems like you'd have a fair bit!
Same rucks as me so i like!
Really like the team mate!
Got to wait for nab to judge malceski
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Capper on December 16, 2015, 07:09:09 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 16, 2015, 04:59:24 PM
cant get Simpson off the bench for some reason

drop adams, drop simpson, pick up simpson, pick up adams

also McVeigh just got off crutches so watch him closely
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: T Dog on December 16, 2015, 08:30:18 PM
the system is telling you...don't field Simpson.   ;D
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Money Shot on December 17, 2015, 02:18:08 AM
Im assuming you have a lot of cash left over!? Anyways id personally prefer another premium forward instead of the 5 premium defenders but that's just my opinion. Good looking team there mate!
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 17, 2015, 04:49:50 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 17, 2015, 02:18:08 AM
Im assuming you have a lot of cash left over!? Anyways id personally prefer another premium forward instead of the 5 premium defenders but that's just my opinion. Good looking team there mate!

well there are way more forward rookies to like then in defense
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 18, 2015, 01:40:53 AM
liking this team better more even spread

(http://i67.tinypic.com/33tibmu.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Money Shot on December 18, 2015, 09:48:11 AM
This is a very good team. Maybe downgrade Hoper to a cheaper player and Mills to Crouch?

Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Grufflez on December 18, 2015, 11:23:40 AM
You got Libba in there, that's why it looks better  ;)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 18, 2015, 07:03:35 PM
cheers guys

the 2nd half of each line is determined by rookies named round 1 anyway
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 19, 2015, 11:08:06 PM
wondering if this defense is worth not having Goldy

(http://i66.tinypic.com/xp3gbk.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: meow meow on December 19, 2015, 11:16:24 PM
Why Rosa?

Can he average 95 and be one of the best defenders?
No.

Will his price rise by more than 150K and be worth it as a cow?
No.

Not worth having.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 19, 2015, 11:28:00 PM
So you prefer something like this?

so do i actually

(http://i67.tinypic.com/2hd0fwh.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Money Shot on December 20, 2015, 05:31:42 PM
Great side you have there mate. Would be trying to get Crouch in though.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Fid on December 20, 2015, 07:05:19 PM
Love you side.  I have gone the same top four mids but have gone crouch instead of Libba.

I also like your F3, I reckon Merrett is going to have a great season and go to the next level
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 23, 2015, 08:25:09 PM
i doubt i will be starting Crouch is to injury prone have watched him closely for last 2 years cause i had him in BXV
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Money Shot on December 23, 2015, 08:29:46 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 23, 2015, 08:25:09 PM
i doubt i will be starting Crouch is to injury prone have watched him closely for last to years cause i had him in BXV
Fair enough!
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: crowls on December 25, 2015, 10:42:59 AM
Quote from: Money Shot on December 23, 2015, 08:29:46 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 23, 2015, 08:25:09 PM
i doubt i will be starting Crouch is to injury prone have watched him closely for last to years cause i had him in BXV
Fair enough!
great team fj.    maybe consider greene for zerrett,  understand crouch reasoning and will save you atrade over the rest if he doesnt last.   zorko likely to avg 100 but martin or bennell likely to get 110+


Appreciate your comments on my team
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: GoLions on December 28, 2015, 11:34:35 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 19, 2015, 11:28:00 PM
So you prefer something like this?

so do i actually

(http://i67.tinypic.com/2hd0fwh.jpg)
Nice defence

Strong mids, understand your reasoning for Crouch, been thinking the same myself, but still have him in for now and hoping he'll last the first 8-10 weeks at least

Strong rucks, nice

Forwards look alright

How much cash left?
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Ringo on December 28, 2015, 11:47:19 AM
Do you have much cash left KB.  Reason for asking is you will initially with this team be relying on 6 rookies and Kennedy to play each week which may be a bit of risk but then may pay off big time if they rise quickly.

With Fyfe back injury need to monitor as well.  Nice team though
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: dmac07 on December 29, 2015, 12:02:15 PM
Like most of the premium picks, not sure about Hurley or Zorko, only ones I don't see as great picks. Main issue I see with this team is relying on 13 pretty much bottom prices rookies, 5 of them on the field each week. Very likely you will have to sacrifice a premium to get 300-400k to upgrade some of these I think.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: enzedder on December 29, 2015, 12:34:39 PM
With Fyfe doubtful and at that price tag he is hard to justify. Shaw is an excellent pick but at the price tag you're scraping elsewhere. With Goldy you've done it again...I can see why he's a must have.
My advice would be to get some cash back from Fyfe and play further with your forwards.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 29, 2015, 06:45:38 PM
which structure do u guys prefer notice Deledio on the bench with team B no matter what i do he gets moved onto the bench for some reason when i click save lol


(http://i67.tinypic.com/2wqse2x.jpg)

(http://i67.tinypic.com/10rjpev.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Regs81 on December 29, 2015, 06:48:47 PM
Definitely prefer team 1
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Gigantor on December 29, 2015, 07:46:02 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 29, 2015, 06:45:38 PM
which structure do u guys prefer notice Deledio on the bench with team B no matter what i do he gets moved onto the bench for some reason when i click save lol

Had the same problem, remove two fwd rookies then hit save, then add them back in and hit save again, worked for me
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: enzedder on December 29, 2015, 08:47:21 PM
Quote from: Regs81 on December 29, 2015, 06:48:47 PM
Definitely prefer team 1
Me too with Lids on the bench... Tell u what get a 102k rookie that won't play throw him on the field and use the E on lids... Might be better. ;D
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 29, 2015, 09:50:05 PM
Quote from: enzedder on December 29, 2015, 08:47:21 PM
Quote from: Regs81 on December 29, 2015, 06:48:47 PM
Definitely prefer team 1
Me too with Lids on the bench... Tell u what get a 102k rookie that won't play throw him on the field and use the E on lids... Might be better. ;D

what? team 2 had Lids not team 1

and did u read what i wrote it wouldn't ;et me change it lol
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: enzedder on December 30, 2015, 08:38:29 AM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on December 29, 2015, 09:50:05 PM
Quote from: enzedder on December 29, 2015, 08:47:21 PM
Quote from: Regs81 on December 29, 2015, 06:48:47 PM
Definitely prefer team 1
Me too with Lids on the bench... Tell u what get a 102k rookie that won't play throw him on the field and use the E on lids... Might be better. ;D

what? team 2 had Lids not team 1

and did u read what i wrote it wouldn't ;et me change it lol
I just wanted to make fun of Lids on the bench...like team 1 cause mids go deeper, better rucks, Heater nullifies Lids....well he's better actually because he's on the ground lol....oops did it again ;)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Sabretooth Tigers on December 31, 2015, 02:02:17 AM
 ;)

I like team 2 mate. I would consider trading Birchall down to Seedsman and then Oliver up to Brad Crouch
But as usual your teams are always quality, any thoughts on Toby Greene for 2016 ??  Hate to quote such famous words, but
" I had a dream "           :) ;D ::)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on December 31, 2015, 02:48:08 AM
Quote from: Sabretooth Tigers on December 31, 2015, 02:02:17 AM
;)

I like team 2 mate. I would consider trading Birchall down to Seedsman and then Oliver up to Brad Crouch
But as usual your teams are always quality, any thoughts on Toby Greene for 2016 ??  Hate to quote such famous words, but
" I had a dream "           :) ;D ::)

cheers bro i usually have shocking luck with injuries though lol

Zerrett is a better choice then Greene imo

best choices under 500k in order imo are

Zerrett
Robbo
Edwards
Smith
Greene
Motlop
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on January 01, 2016, 03:37:36 PM
interesting team

midfield is weakish but i don't mind it as not sure who else i want to start

(http://i67.tinypic.com/wirgxk.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on January 04, 2016, 12:42:53 PM
i think this team could post some big scores early

(http://i65.tinypic.com/2whnx5f.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Peter on January 04, 2016, 12:50:57 PM
Anyone heard anything further on Wells playing - how has he been training?
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: crowls on January 05, 2016, 02:07:46 AM
Think Dec 31 team is very good.    Great depth on fwds best rucks and considered mids with cashcow generation to come from rookies.  Good selection of midpricers in Def.
Well done.


Dont like wells and anderson in d4/5 in latest team and would consider KK instead of Yeo.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on January 10, 2016, 11:22:23 PM
made this team for lols after reading eaglemans theory that there wont be any rookies this year

(http://i65.tinypic.com/2vvnbyo.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Gigantor on January 10, 2016, 11:27:10 PM
Haha I've done the same thing, its not the worst team, you would probably start really strong but fade away later unless you had a perfect run with injuries.

I'm thinking of trying this in AF with the unlimited trades, it's my first year so I don't really care if I crash and burn

Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: eaglesman on January 10, 2016, 11:38:05 PM
Haha I am not saying there won't be any rookies ... I just feel that overall the competition for spots will be greater than in previous years ...

I even looked at best 22 for lions blues saints and demons and even that has me slightly concerned.

If u check my side currently I have the same placeholder rookie set up that most have
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on January 10, 2016, 11:40:13 PM
Quote from: eaglesman on January 10, 2016, 11:38:05 PM
Haha I am not saying there won't be any rookies ... I just feel that overall the competition for spots will be greater than in previous years ...

I even looked at best 22 for lions blues saints and demons and even that has me slightly concerned.

If u check my side currently I have the same placeholder rookie set up that most have

all good bro was mostly just bored
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on January 29, 2016, 06:22:44 AM
(http://i63.tinypic.com/2vrx5qo.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: sammy123 on January 29, 2016, 02:46:51 PM
very good team KB. i like it very much. unsure on robbo pick put could b a great POD
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Big Mac on January 29, 2016, 06:52:27 PM
Looking good mate

What are your thoughts on Aish and Merrett? I can't see Aish making enough money to be worth it and I don't really see Merrett's scores improving either with the lack of support
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on January 29, 2016, 07:16:46 PM
Quote from: Big  Mac on January 29, 2016, 06:52:27 PM
Looking good mate

What are your thoughts on Aish and Merrett? I can't see Aish making enough money to be worth it and I don't really see Merrett's scores improving either with the lack of support

i highly rate Zerrett man his lowest score was 69 was last year very consistent  predicting top 10 forward for him this year doesn't really have any flaws

about Aish it will depend on rookies available if i start him and how he goes in nab i could get a rookie instead and upgrade someone tp Shaw
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: fasttrack13 on January 29, 2016, 08:25:20 PM
See 12-15 keepers which is good

Zerrett + Robbo good pods it will be interesting to see the impact of Bastinac and Bell on him which I doubt will be any.

Birchal although reliable is on the decline and i would consider a swap for him
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 10, 2016, 11:25:54 PM
current team which i'm pretty happy with like 45k left

(http://i63.tinypic.com/16gfv29.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: TomK on February 11, 2016, 12:48:05 AM
Nice team KB, looks real good. No Dusty is interesting though.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Bully on February 11, 2016, 02:37:07 AM
Not a fan of the McKenzie & Merrett selections, think you should bring in Deledio and pick another backline rookie, there should be plenty to choose from, Hartley for example. Don't like the Dea pick either, he had plenty of chances at Richmond and proved himself to be nothing more than a a bush footballer.   
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Bully on February 11, 2016, 03:10:02 AM
And surely Martin deserves a gig over Robbo? Dusty is a gun who is good enough to win a Brownlow, non negotiable.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 11, 2016, 03:46:32 AM
Dea is mostly a place holder

i don't like the life issues that come with Dusty

backing Zerrett to be a top 10 forward
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: FactHunt on February 11, 2016, 10:36:05 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 11, 2016, 03:46:32 AM
Dea is mostly a place holder

i don't like the life issues that come with Dusty

backing Zerrett to be a top 10 forward
[/b]

Good man KB... season low of 73 last year, with natural improvement- has a big ceiling too. I like it!
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 13, 2016, 04:36:12 PM
changed team up after hearing Wells and Fyfe are doing well and this team gives me a boner

(http://i66.tinypic.com/dx1bad.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: piesfan1989 on February 13, 2016, 07:13:32 PM
way better options than crowley
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 13, 2016, 11:08:29 PM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on February 13, 2016, 07:13:32 PM
way better options than crowley

picked after Worsfold saying they want to try ti use him as an attacking mid
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Gigantor on February 13, 2016, 11:35:39 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 13, 2016, 11:08:29 PM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on February 13, 2016, 07:13:32 PM
way better options than crowley

picked after Worsfold saying they want to try ti use him as an attacking mid

He's probably not the worst pick.

What are people expecting from guys like Mills, Hopper, Francis, Parish? 75-80? any more and you're dreaming.

If Crowley can average 55-60 tagging every week there is no reason why he could push towards 80 if he playing as a normal mid
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 29, 2016, 03:06:05 AM
toying around with this structure

(http://i64.tinypic.com/wtyq9y.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: quinny88 on February 29, 2016, 03:09:33 AM
Can't remember the last time I saw a team with a rookie at R2!
How much cash does this leave you with? You may need a bit extra for the rookie listed rookies that may not get games round 1
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on February 29, 2016, 03:24:31 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 29, 2016, 03:09:33 AM
Can't remember the last time I saw a team with a rookie at R2!
How much cash does this leave you with? You may need a bit extra for the rookie listed rookies that may not get games round 1

literally 1k lol if i need extra would get Malceski or Salem instead of Bob

really it's kind of Tippett at R2 but going with the theory Michael will make more cash and score better then the forward rookies
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Bully on February 29, 2016, 08:10:05 PM
Quote from: kilbluff1985 on February 29, 2016, 03:24:31 AM
Quote from: quinny88 on February 29, 2016, 03:09:33 AM
Can't remember the last time I saw a team with a rookie at R2!
How much cash does this leave you with? You may need a bit extra for the rookie listed rookies that may not get games round 1

literally 1k lol if i need extra would get Malceski or Salem instead of Bob

really it's kind of Tippett at R2 but going with the theory Michael will make more cash and score better then the forward rookies

As a key position player I think he will struggle to match the output of the other rookies. The volatility of having 2 KP players in prime positions is a recipe for disaster, Tippett could score 35 one week and if Grimely has an off day you're Garnier Fructus.
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: T Dog on February 29, 2016, 08:39:36 PM
[quote author=Bully link=topic=105198.msg1720804#msg1720804 date=1456737005

As a key position player I think he will struggle to match the output of the other rookies. The volatility of having 2 KP players in prime positions is a recipe for disaster, Tippett could score 35 one week and if Grimely has an off day you're Garnier Fructus.
[/quote]

You're stylish KB  ;D
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Nige on March 01, 2016, 12:31:44 AM
I like the bold move of a rookie at R2. Could be genius if you get away with it.

It does allow you to get away with more premos in fwd/def and that's always handy.

If you decide against the rookie ruck starting, who are you looking at to replace him and how would that affect the rest of your team? Would you go lighter up forward or down back?
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 01, 2016, 12:35:19 AM
Quote from: Nige on March 01, 2016, 12:31:44 AM
I like the bold move of a rookie at R2. Could be genius if you get away with it.

It does allow you to get away with more premos in fwd/def and that's always handy.

If you decide against the rookie ruck starting, who are you looking at to replace him and how would that affect the rest of your team? Would you go lighter up forward or down back?

this is my standard team

(http://i68.tinypic.com/2d85f2q.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 05, 2016, 06:28:09 PM
liking this structure no cash left

(http://i63.tinypic.com/120nl9g.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 17, 2016, 06:08:13 AM
current team

(http://i64.tinypic.com/efjgvt.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: sammy123 on March 17, 2016, 09:08:55 AM
solid can't fault it
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 21, 2016, 09:43:30 PM
final team besides rookies

(http://i65.tinypic.com/24xn9xy.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: Gandalf123 on March 21, 2016, 10:02:09 PM
this team is sick mate - feel like the back line makes up for the 1 less prem midfielder you're going with compared to everyone else who are rolling with 5 and libba - good shower
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: piesfan1989 on March 22, 2016, 09:48:26 PM
Mind if I ask why you selected yeo? He didn't show many positive signs in NAB?
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 22, 2016, 09:58:04 PM
Quote from: piesfan1989 on March 22, 2016, 09:48:26 PM
Mind if I ask why you selected yeo? He didn't show many positive signs in NAB?

NAB is only relevant for rookies
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: GoLions on March 22, 2016, 10:08:35 PM
How much cash left kb? Keays may have to become someone such as Oliver, but looks really good apart from that!
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 22, 2016, 10:13:29 PM
Quote from: GoLions on March 22, 2016, 10:08:35 PM
How much cash left kb? Keays may have to become someone such as Oliver, but looks really good apart from that!

11k

after i have changed it though but i can go Crouch to Oliver and Keays to Parish if i need to

(http://i68.tinypic.com/t8t46b.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 27, 2016, 07:49:48 PM
final team reveal 75k left

(http://i67.tinypic.com/260s935.jpg)
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: FactHunt on March 30, 2016, 01:48:33 PM
No Z Merrett :(
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on March 31, 2016, 09:29:12 AM
Quote from: FactHunt on March 30, 2016, 01:48:33 PM
No Z Merrett :(

decided A Hall was a better pick wish i went Zerrett instead of Dusty though
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: geoffmack on April 01, 2016, 10:56:46 AM
I really like the team balance.

What did u score R1?
Title: Re: FIGJAM 2016
Post by: kilbluff1985 on April 01, 2016, 09:41:40 PM
Quote from: geoffmack on April 01, 2016, 10:56:46 AM
I really like the team balance.

What did u score R1?

cheers

2180