E2's Final Preparations

Started by essendon2, February 25, 2013, 08:49:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

essendon2

Quote from: Toga on March 11, 2013, 01:28:29 PM
My opinions on the head to head:

Heppell (94) + Beams (118) + Martin (92) + Whitfield (80) + Pittard (65)          =449

Hibberd (83) + Boyd (115) + Macaffer (72) + Murphy (108) + Armstrong (82)    =460



Although atm I am an advocate of only starting four midfield premiums + Whitfield because it allows me to have four def premiums, and play no rookies on field in my fwd line!
Forgot to add this option mate!

Heppell + Beams + JJK/Pettard + Whitfield + Hartlett

Toga

Heppell (94) + Beams (118) + Whitfield (80) + Pittard (65) = 449

Hibberd (83) + Boyd (115) + Macaffer (72) + Murphy (108) + Armstrong (83) =460

Heppell (94) + Beams (118) + JJK (74) + Whitfield (80) + Hartlett (92) = 458



Option 2 still wins! :)

essendon2

Roughead + Beams
vs
Maric + Watson

&
JPK v Dangerfield v Swallow

pretty pleased with it otherwise  8)

Toga

Only two premium DEF's?! :o That is what I call ballsy! :o

As for your combo questions:

Roughead (95) + Beams (120)   =215

Maric (102) + Watson (115)       =217


And I'd go Dangerfield > Swallow > JPK tbh...

essendon2

Quote from: Toga on March 16, 2013, 09:28:25 PM
Only two premium DEF's?! :o That is what I call ballsy! :o

As for your combo questions:

Roughead (95) + Beams (120)   =215

Maric (102) + Watson (115)       =217


And I'd go Dangerfield > Swallow > JPK tbh...
well in that case... Dangerfield + Colquhoun + Maric
vs
Moloney + Hibberd + Roughead

Toga

i'd stick with option 1 mate although not sold on colq's JS... Campbell Heath?

essendon2

Quote from: Toga on March 16, 2013, 09:52:54 PM
i'd stick with option 1 mate although not sold on colq's JS... Campbell Heath?
yeah maybe, well as you can see, Colq wouldn't be on my ground anyway. He was named in the best for Port today though  8)

Toga

Quote from: essendon2 on March 16, 2013, 09:55:51 PM
Quote from: Toga on March 16, 2013, 09:52:54 PM
i'd stick with option 1 mate although not sold on colq's JS... Campbell Heath?
yeah maybe, well as you can see, Colq wouldn't be on my ground anyway. He was named in the best for Port today though  8)

Yeah no denying the kid is a superstar and a DT slut 8)

Will be interesting to see if he is named early on though! Will be the differnce between me starting Hartlett or Deledio! :-X

Money

Quote from: essendon2 on March 16, 2013, 09:07:04 PM
Roughead + Beams
vs
Maric + Watson

&
JPK v Dangerfield v Swallow

pretty pleased with it otherwise  8)


Whats this, only 2 back premos O.o

nightwalker_1310au

Team still a work in progress

Back line needs another prem mate- rate 5.5/10 for creativeness
Mids real strong mybe try downgrading a player and adding the likes of Moloney as plenty of good rookies/ mid prices players out there that you can make quick money from- rate 9/10
Ruck- real solid  rate 9.75/10 can't fault there as you have cox swinging back into forward line if needed with Rowe in forward line.
Forward line- looks flowered maybe upgrade Pittard to prem with extra money. Too many rookies out in the field. 4.5/10

Overall solid 5.3/10 for creative thinking and still work in progress.
Can you rate my team please
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,74402.0.html

essendon2

Quote from: nightwalker_1310au on March 17, 2013, 06:19:24 AM
Team still a work in progress

Back line needs another prem mate- rate 5.5/10 for creativeness
Mids real strong mybe try downgrading a player and adding the likes of Moloney as plenty of good rookies/ mid prices players out there that you can make quick money from- rate 9/10
Ruck- real solid  rate 9.75/10 can't fault there as you have cox swinging back into forward line if needed with Rowe in forward line.
Forward line- looks flowered maybe upgrade Pittard to prem with extra money. Too many rookies out in the field. 4.5/10

Overall solid 5.3/10 for creative thinking and still work in progress.
Can you rate my team please
http://www.fanfooty.com.au/forum/index.php/topic,74402.0.html
words cannot describe how much of an imbecile you are, and no I will not have a look at yours mate, xoxo

Toga


essendon2


Toga

Quote from: essendon2 on March 17, 2013, 11:08:48 AM
Quote from: Toga on March 17, 2013, 10:56:12 AM
Wow is all I have to say! :o
still rolling with 4 Gun MID?

*The wow was in regards to that blokes comments btw haha ;)

Yep, current set up (P-M-R) is:
DEF: 4-0-4
MID: 4-0-6
RUC: 1-1-2
FWD: 4-2-2

mids atm are: Swan, Beams, Pendles, Lids, rookies... :-X would love to fit Cotchin/Watson/Boyd in there but don't know I'll be able to :-[

essendon2

Quote from: Toga on March 17, 2013, 11:12:24 AM
Quote from: essendon2 on March 17, 2013, 11:08:48 AM
Quote from: Toga on March 17, 2013, 10:56:12 AM
Wow is all I have to say! :o
still rolling with 4 Gun MID?

*The wow was in regards to that blokes comments btw haha ;)

Yep, current set up (P-M-R) is:
DEF: 4-0-4
MID: 4-0-6
RUC: 1-1-2
FWD: 4-2-2

mids atm are: Swan, Beams, Pendles, Lids, rookies... :-X would love to fit Cotchin/Watson/Boyd in there but don't know I'll be able to :-[
so pretty much it's:
2 DEF Gun + 1 m-p RUC + 1 MID rook vs 2 DEF rooks + 1 Gun RUC + 1 Gun MID