Post what you're on!!! did you do well or not so well? ~ Post GWS Game

essendon2 · March 24, 2012, 10:59:19 PM

I had Kennedy (116), Bugg (97), McDonald (98), Mumford (91), Giles (77) & Smith (69)
548 from 6!!!!! so happy

elephants · March 24, 2012, 11:01:07 PM

Good start mate.

3/199. Giles, Smith and Coniglio starting while McDonald and Bugg chopped up while sitting on the bench...

Should be thankful I didn't start Shiel I guess...

Colliwobblers · March 24, 2012, 11:01:54 PM

I had Kennedy (116), Bugg (103), Mumford (91), Giles (77), Coniglio (53)

So 440 from 5, Happy with all except Coniglio !

turry17 · March 24, 2012, 11:02:26 PM

630 from 7 ;D

Chelskiman · March 24, 2012, 11:03:53 PM

477 from 5. Great start.

theswiz · March 24, 2012, 11:04:07 PM

Technically 440 from 5 but I had bugg as reserve so it could be 543 from 6 if I pick a rook not playing this week!

pistolpk · March 24, 2012, 11:05:17 PM

3 players, kennedy, bugg and mcdonald. 3 others on bench.

3 players for 317.

elephants · March 24, 2012, 11:05:42 PM

Quote from: theswiz on March 24, 2012, 11:04:07 PM
Technically 440 from 5 but I had bugg as reserve so it could be 543 from 6 if I pick a rook not playing this week!

I tossed this up.... Is it worth picking someone not named??
*Please don't name Morris :P

Windigo · March 24, 2012, 11:05:57 PM

493 from 6.

Bugg bench. Hope Morris doesn't play. :P

Coniglio on field. But still happy with him, looked impressive.

Nails · March 24, 2012, 11:06:25 PM

Goodes (84) Eski (83)

JMac (98) Giles (77) D. Smith (69)

With Bugg and Shiel on the pine.

Therefore 5/411 - overall that's not great and not bad. I'll take it. :)

owenbond007 · March 24, 2012, 11:06:56 PM

Quote from: theswiz on March 24, 2012, 11:04:07 PM
Technically 440 from 5 but I had bugg as reserve so it could be 543 from 6 if I pick a rook not playing this week!

or bock????

theswiz · March 24, 2012, 11:09:47 PM

Quote from: elephants on March 24, 2012, 11:05:42 PM
Quote from: theswiz on March 24, 2012, 11:04:07 PM
Technically 440 from 5 but I had bugg as reserve so it could be 543 from 6 if I pick a rook not playing this week!
I tossed this up.... Is it worth picking someone not named??
*Please don't name Morris :P

I have 3/4 options that are rookies/non premiums playing in my backline. I could always downgrade hargrave...
I also have boumann, ellis and morris. So I figure I can always trade boumann for someone who looks good but isn't playing. It's pretty enticing.

theswiz · March 24, 2012, 11:10:53 PM

Quote from: owenbond007 on March 24, 2012, 11:06:56 PM
Quote from: theswiz on March 24, 2012, 11:04:07 PM
Technically 440 from 5 but I had bugg as reserve so it could be 543 from 6 if I pick a rook not playing this week!

or bock????

What about bock?
Is he suspended round 1?
He's not much of a premium... I'd rather cop a 0 :P

elephants · March 24, 2012, 11:11:01 PM

Hmmmmm I could bring in Bock for one of my mid-pricers...

Ricochet · March 24, 2012, 11:12:00 PM

5/439
had Jmac, Smith, Kennedy, Conigs and Bugg starting.