Dangerfield.... Or this smokey bloke?

Started by coolfugitiv0, March 14, 2012, 09:59:04 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Dangerfield or Hale

David Hale
5 (25%)
Patrick Dangerfield
15 (75%)

Total Members Voted: 1

coolfugitiv0

With Hale now first ruck, he could post some decent scores. Looks like he can take a mark as well, which helps if he plays forward.
Would it be worth getting him in the forward line?

I'm going to get either him or Danger, but which? Let's just say I'll be watching his last NAB game closely.

dmac07

Risky, but I do like the uniqueness of Hale, if theres not too many other risky picks in your team, take hale

Mozza3

I like your way of thinking and the advantage with Hale is he can swing into the rucks as well. I think Danger will outscore him but that R/F option is food for thought.