My Team (UPDATED)

Started by mophead222, January 02, 2011, 02:44:27 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

mophead222

B -  Goddard, Gibbs, Deledio, Broughton, Otten, Drummond, Jacobs - Iles, Richardson, Toy

M - Swan, Boyd, Swallow, Swallow, Gaff, Heppell - Green, Krakouer, Mzungu

R - Sandilands, Petrie - Smith, Bailey

F - Riewoldt, Franklin, Pavlich, Rioli, Sidebottom, Knights, Prestia - Lamb, Darling, Mcdonald


All feedback is appreciated.

Thanks :)

oodmutler

Top Team there Mophead.

Can't really fault it. You seem to have all MPP's covered.

I'm not like D.Jolly, but the new sub rule could work in his favour by spending time up forward and bagging a few.

9.5/10

Cheers!

MajorLazer

Great team, Mop. ;D

It's very strong and is very well rounded.

9.65319/10. ;D

mophead222

cheers guys, oddmutler, what you dont like about jolly?

oodmutler

I believe $400k for him is too much. Has only had one decent year, which was 2009. Though as i mentioned, the new sub rule could increase his SC output.

mophead222

yer, good point on the sub rule, coz he will be forced to rest up foward so more goals and more time on the ground mean more points for MEEEE :P

pyronerd

Quote from: Junktimer on January 02, 2011, 09:25:32 PM
mophead great team

My one point is I think Jolly shoud be traded for Petrie, as I think its very hard to pick set and forget picks, and a 400k odd forward is much better than a ruck, IMO.

Great team, one of the best I've seen, 9.5/10
+1 although it may depend on whether u plan to use F/R MPP or not, i would recommend sacrificing it in favour of having petrie in the ruck, or u can have both if u move Mcdonald into the forward line and and take a risk putting prestia on the field, u would have to work around GCs round 1 bye for that though

overall a fantastic team mophead, should do extremely well, 9.5/10  ;D

mophead222

if i do take jolly out and put petrie into the ruucks, what 400K foward should i put in? or start dion?

oodmutler

You could then upgrade Sidebottom to Chapman.

mophead222

i like sidey and  think he can improve, whereas i think chappy is a better upgrade target coz he may sink or swim with ablett gone .

pyronerd

Quote from: mophead222 on January 03, 2011, 01:25:27 PM
i like sidey and  think he can improve, whereas i think chappy is a better upgrade target coz he may sink or swim with ablett gone .
+1 also be wary of chappys hammys  :P

mophead222

Quote from: pyronerd on January 03, 2011, 01:26:27 PM
Quote from: mophead222 on January 03, 2011, 01:25:27 PM
i like sidey and  think he can improve, whereas i think chappy is a better upgrade target coz he may sink or swim with ablett gone .
+1 also be wary of chappys hammys  :P
+1

MTTY

1. Great backline, cant see any improvements

2.Another great line.

3.Yet again another solid line

4.Another great line

5. might want to get tferrier to do his thing with the byes, if he hasen't already.

This is the best team i have seen on the site for this years comp.

9.99/10

Knowall

Quote from: mophead222 on January 02, 2011, 02:44:27 PM
Backs - B.Gibbs, B.Deledio, G.Broughton, J.Drummond, A.Otten, D.Heppell, B.Jacobs - S.Iles, C.Richardson, J.Toy

Mids - B.Goddard, D.Swan, A.Swallow, D.Swallow, A.Gaff, R.Conca - J.Green, A.Krakouer, T.Mzungu

Rucks - A.Sandilands, D.Jolly - Z.Smith, T.Mcdonald

Fowards - N.Riewoldt, L.Franklin, M.Pavlich, C.Rioli, S.Sidebottom, D.Petrie, C.Knights - D.Prestia, I.Smith, J.Darling

$23,900 Left

All feedback is appreciated.

Thanks :)
Not going to fault ur backline all plays are good including rookies.
Mids decent but as ive said to other teams i reckon pendles is a better option than swan and u save a bit of cash.
Nice Rucks
Fwds are very steady also.
So in the end u can probally keep swan if u pefer as i dont see anything to achieve in upgrading another player.  9/10

mophead222

thnks guys, knowall, im just gunna go  with swan. i did some research on all this pendles vs swan stuff and i'd rather hve him.

cheers MTTY :)  no 10? :p